Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	huguesdb
Date/Time:	Tue, October 17, 2000 at 1:16 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	It is a bit strange....
Message:
The idea of a .kids is exellent and your approach is a pragmatic way of funding it. However, I do have a personal problem with thinking that the more xxx sites there are, the better our kids are protected. I guess its a moral issue for me. I would much rather pay you $6 or more per year for you to focus on greating a super internet experience for kids. Well, that's just a personal point of view. Best regards, Hugues Du Bois Switzerland

Message Thread:

• .kids, etc. Application by ICM Registry, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:18 PM (15/40)
• kids and xxx should be added with precautions taken — daimonic, November 3 @ 8:06 AM (0/0)
• XXX and KIDS are the reason NOT to do this — Lindy Kathlyn, November 3 @ 2:58 AM (1/1)
• Read the Proposal — mpalage, November 3 @ 6:45 AM (0/0)
• COPA Commission should support your proposal — jodybresgi, October 31 @ 8:56 PM (0/0)
• ICM Registry has the best Proposal Hands Down — Neo, October 27 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)
• Its about time — MJ, October 27 @ 3:37 PM (0/0)
• .kids tld - general observation — john.carr, October 27 @ 9:03 AM (1/2)
• Consensus building will take time — hendeles, October 30 @ 7:40 PM (1/1)
• Why? — nicholasmoraitis, November 1 @ 12:36 AM (0/0)
• Important first step to cleaning up the internet! — Talya, October 25 @ 5:36 PM (0/0)
• Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)
• ICM .kids — algajola24, October 17 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)
• About time! ICM plan positive for content providers — r9stein, October 17 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
• I am Against this application/More Network Solutions involvement — Merlin, October 17 @ 1:51 AM (0/0)
• .kids — drdjklein, October 16 @ 7:55 PM (2/2)
• .kids — jschulich, October 17 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
• I agree — hedeer, October 17 @ 3:26 PM (0/0)
• KIDS TLD APPLICATION SHOULD BE ACCEPTED — franmail, October 16 @ 1:18 PM (1/2)
• .KIDS and .XXX can work well — Bob-Ottawa, October 16 @ 7:19 PM (1/1)
• Business/dollar  mix of kids and porn is revolting, with possible social downturn — mystwoman, November 1 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
• Review ICM Registry's Submission to ICANN at www.icmregistry.com — Hendeles, October 15 @ 5:09 PM (3/14)
• It is a bit strange.... — huguesdb, October 17 @ 1:16 AM (1/1)
• Thinking Outside the Box — mpalage, October 17 @ 2:52 AM (0/0)
• not a good combination — slassre, October 16 @ 7:07 PM (1/5)
• .XXX AND .KIDS ARE NOT COMBINED — Hendeles, October 17 @ 12:57 AM (1/4)
• insincere intentions — brahim_m, October 18 @ 8:11 PM (1/3)
• Please make constructive comments — Hendeles, October 20 @ 7:24 PM (1/2)
• a few questions, ICM & NSI — hedeer, October 21 @ 12:15 AM (1/1)
• .xxx & .kids MUST work together to categorize Internet content — Hendeles, October 24 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)
• Highly odd — nicholasmoraitis, October 16 @ 7:11 AM (1/5)
• ICM REGISTRY RESPONSE - Our proposal is to improve the Internet — Hendeles, October 16 @ 9:42 PM (1/4)
• response — nicholasmoraitis, October 17 @ 12:02 AM (1/3)
• Dot Kids Inc. — hedeer, October 21 @ 12:17 AM (1/2)
• ICM Registry proposal comments only please! — Hendeles, October 24 @ 11:17 PM (1/1)
• I'm only trying to be informative — hedeer, October 25 @ 1:37 AM (0/0)
• .KIDS TLD Application Should Be Denied - details inside... — ron10000, October 14 @ 5:23 PM (1/4)
• Red-Light & Green Space TLDs (Fact v. Fiction) — mpalage, October 17 @ 2:42 AM (1/3)
• Can you clarify please? — nicholasmoraitis, October 17 @ 3:29 AM (2/2)
• OPEN & TRANSPARENT REGISTRATION POLICY — Hendeles, October 17 @ 6:18 AM (0/0)
• Clarification — mpalage, October 17 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy