Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Lindy Kathlyn
Date/Time:	Fri, November 3, 2000 at 2:58 AM GMT
Browser:	AOL Browser V4.0 using Windows 95
Score:	5
Subject:	XXX and KIDS are the reason NOT to do this
Message:
Anyone who's interested in XXX material is the exact person that should NOT be associated with the KIDS material. The perception is bad and the reality even worse. To decide whether or not XXX material on the web is a matter of morals and values; to decide whether or not kids should have a safe place to explore and learn should not be left to the XXXers. Perhaps if there'd been a .KIDS for them in their youth, they wouldn't be pushing for XXX today! I'm a non high-tech mom whose kids are on the computer a lot. I heard Mr. Howe on news radio and think he's on the right track.

Message Thread:

• .kids, etc. Application by ICM Registry, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:18 PM (15/40)
• kids and xxx should be added with precautions taken — daimonic, November 3 @ 8:06 AM (0/0)
• XXX and KIDS are the reason NOT to do this — Lindy Kathlyn, November 3 @ 2:58 AM (1/1)
• Read the Proposal — mpalage, November 3 @ 6:45 AM (0/0)
• COPA Commission should support your proposal — jodybresgi, October 31 @ 8:56 PM (0/0)
• ICM Registry has the best Proposal Hands Down — Neo, October 27 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)
• Its about time — MJ, October 27 @ 3:37 PM (0/0)
• .kids tld - general observation — john.carr, October 27 @ 9:03 AM (1/2)
• Consensus building will take time — hendeles, October 30 @ 7:40 PM (1/1)
• Why? — nicholasmoraitis, November 1 @ 12:36 AM (0/0)
• Important first step to cleaning up the internet! — Talya, October 25 @ 5:36 PM (0/0)
• Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)
• ICM .kids — algajola24, October 17 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)
• About time! ICM plan positive for content providers — r9stein, October 17 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
• I am Against this application/More Network Solutions involvement — Merlin, October 17 @ 1:51 AM (0/0)
• .kids — drdjklein, October 16 @ 7:55 PM (2/2)
• .kids — jschulich, October 17 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
• I agree — hedeer, October 17 @ 3:26 PM (0/0)
• KIDS TLD APPLICATION SHOULD BE ACCEPTED — franmail, October 16 @ 1:18 PM (1/2)
• .KIDS and .XXX can work well — Bob-Ottawa, October 16 @ 7:19 PM (1/1)
• Business/dollar  mix of kids and porn is revolting, with possible social downturn — mystwoman, November 1 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
• Review ICM Registry's Submission to ICANN at www.icmregistry.com — Hendeles, October 15 @ 5:09 PM (3/14)
• It is a bit strange.... — huguesdb, October 17 @ 1:16 AM (1/1)
• Thinking Outside the Box — mpalage, October 17 @ 2:52 AM (0/0)
• not a good combination — slassre, October 16 @ 7:07 PM (1/5)
• .XXX AND .KIDS ARE NOT COMBINED — Hendeles, October 17 @ 12:57 AM (1/4)
• insincere intentions — brahim_m, October 18 @ 8:11 PM (1/3)
• Please make constructive comments — Hendeles, October 20 @ 7:24 PM (1/2)
• a few questions, ICM & NSI — hedeer, October 21 @ 12:15 AM (1/1)
• .xxx & .kids MUST work together to categorize Internet content — Hendeles, October 24 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)
• Highly odd — nicholasmoraitis, October 16 @ 7:11 AM (1/5)
• ICM REGISTRY RESPONSE - Our proposal is to improve the Internet — Hendeles, October 16 @ 9:42 PM (1/4)
• response — nicholasmoraitis, October 17 @ 12:02 AM (1/3)
• Dot Kids Inc. — hedeer, October 21 @ 12:17 AM (1/2)
• ICM Registry proposal comments only please! — Hendeles, October 24 @ 11:17 PM (1/1)
• I'm only trying to be informative — hedeer, October 25 @ 1:37 AM (0/0)
• .KIDS TLD Application Should Be Denied - details inside... — ron10000, October 14 @ 5:23 PM (1/4)
• Red-Light & Green Space TLDs (Fact v. Fiction) — mpalage, October 17 @ 2:42 AM (1/3)
• Can you clarify please? — nicholasmoraitis, October 17 @ 3:29 AM (2/2)
• OPEN & TRANSPARENT REGISTRATION POLICY — Hendeles, October 17 @ 6:18 AM (0/0)
• Clarification — mpalage, October 17 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy