Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	lindaw
Date/Time:	Thu, November 2, 2000 at 1:04 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows NT 5.0
Score:	5
Subject:	to Phil
Message:
I completely agree with your point of view.  I feel that the .pro gTLD holds a lot of value for the Internet population. Linda

Message Thread:

• .pro Application by the dotPRO Consortium — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:07 PM (12/60)
• tech view of .nom — techchick, November 4 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
• dotPRO Consortium — Walter Bergfeld, November 4 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)
• reply to walter — fredHanks, November 4 @ 2:03 AM (0/0)
• .pro! — jedrink24, November 3 @ 5:39 PM (2/5)
• price discrimination — fredHanks, November 4 @ 2:06 AM (0/0)
• Ability to pay? — PHXbird, November 3 @ 6:16 PM (1/3)
• "acceptance" — tomam, November 3 @ 6:40 PM (1/2)
• Reply — PHXbird, November 3 @ 6:58 PM (1/1)
• number of professionals on the net — tomam, November 3 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
• ICANN, please, approving dotPRO is a NO-BRAINER — TLDdaddy, November 3 @ 2:05 AM (1/1)
• :^D — bldigrn, November 3 @ 2:59 AM (0/0)
• I vote for dotPro — BionicBro, November 3 @ 1:49 AM (0/0)
• Organization or Chaos? — Jennifer Sun, November 3 @ 1:43 AM (3/3)
• to jennifer (not impressed?) — Hastings, November 6 @ 12:58 AM (0/0)
• cross matching dotTV with other applicants — fred hanks, November 5 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)
• partial agreement — PinkFish, November 3 @ 2:54 AM (0/0)
• .Pro! — Jer072, November 2 @ 2:43 AM (1/2)
• reply to .pro! — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 3:49 AM (1/1)
• to Matt Simmons — Jim Chen, November 2 @ 9:01 PM (0/0)
• DotPro Consortium — tiger74, November 2 @ 2:08 AM (1/14)
• time frame? — Skull, November 2 @ 2:19 AM (2/13)
• dotpro application — SamSingh, November 2 @ 7:49 PM (2/11)
• One thought on .pro — gt515, November 3 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)
• reply to Sam — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 7:56 PM (1/9)
• to Matt — SamSingh, November 2 @ 7:58 PM (1/8)
• Lycos — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 8:03 PM (1/7)
• mgmt team — SamSingh, November 2 @ 8:04 PM (1/6)
• reply to mgmt team — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 8:09 PM (1/5)
• still on mgmt team — SamSingh, November 2 @ 8:10 PM (1/4)
• more on management team — bldigrn, November 2 @ 8:19 PM (1/3)
• reply to bldigrn — SamSingh, November 2 @ 8:35 PM (1/2)
• management matters — tomam, November 2 @ 8:39 PM (1/1)
• reply-mgmt matters — Jim Chen, November 2 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)
• reply to time frame — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)
• The internet should be a utility — mayor, November 1 @ 6:07 AM (0/0)
• I beg to differ — spamela, October 27 @ 12:45 AM (1/20)
• REPLY to SPAMELA RE: Hoarding By .TV — julie, October 28 @ 9:54 AM (2/19)
• reply to Julie — Bob Singer, October 30 @ 6:27 PM (1/15)
• Back to you, Bob... — julie, October 31 @ 11:28 AM (3/14)
• reply to Julie — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 3:44 AM (0/0)
• When — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
• Reply to Julie — Phil Browning, November 2 @ 12:00 AM (2/11)
• Reply to Phil re: $14.33  Avg .TV Domain Price? — julie, November 2 @ 4:06 PM (4/8)
• ha! — fredHanks, November 4 @ 2:08 AM (0/0)
• Julie- please do some homework — bldigrn, November 2 @ 6:52 PM (1/2)
• Homework — julie, November 5 @ 6:36 AM (1/1)
• mgmt stake — fred hanks, November 5 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)
• ? — phil Browning, November 2 @ 6:31 PM (1/2)
• Thankyou  David — julie, November 4 @ 8:07 AM (1/1)
• Deferred Income — David Coombs, November 4 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)
• Accounting Lesson — David Coombs, November 2 @ 6:24 PM (0/0)
• to Phil — lindaw, November 2 @ 1:04 AM (1/1)
• reply to Linda — wayanna, November 2 @ 1:50 AM (0/0)
• please help me understand "hoarding" — bldigrn, October 30 @ 5:59 PM (1/2)
• Reply to Blondie — julie, October 31 @ 12:39 AM (1/1)
• reply to Julie — bldigrn, October 31 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)
• Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
• Dot Pro CONsortium — Julie, October 15 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)
• Hoarding — RoscoePico, November 2 @ 1:26 AM (1/1)
• vokacuca — Carla, November 2 @ 2:07 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy