Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
PHXbird |
| Date/Time: |
Fri, November 3, 2000 at 6:16 PM GMT |
| Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V4.01 using Windows 98 |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
Ability to pay? |
Message: |
|
|
You must be using a different plumber than I am, or your
doctor is overcharging you. How much should a PROfessional baseball star be
charged? And how about a PROfessional jewel thief? My point is, the concept
of a .pro needs a closer look. There are other professionals than
doctors and lawyers who may want a .pro identification, and what process
determines "acceptance" into this TLD?
|
|
|
Message Thread:
- .pro Application by the dotPRO Consortium — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:07 PM (12/60)
- tech view of .nom — techchick, November 4 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
- dotPRO Consortium — Walter Bergfeld, November 4 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)
- .pro! — jedrink24, November 3 @ 5:39 PM (2/5)
- ICANN, please, approving dotPRO is a NO-BRAINER — TLDdaddy, November 3 @ 2:05 AM (1/1)
- I vote for dotPro — BionicBro, November 3 @ 1:49 AM (0/0)
- Organization or Chaos? — Jennifer Sun, November 3 @ 1:43 AM (3/3)
- .Pro! — Jer072, November 2 @ 2:43 AM (1/2)
- DotPro Consortium — tiger74, November 2 @ 2:08 AM (1/14)
- The internet should be a utility — mayor, November 1 @ 6:07 AM (0/0)
- I beg to differ — spamela, October 27 @ 12:45 AM (1/20)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
- Dot Pro CONsortium — Julie, October 15 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy