Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
David Coombs |
Date/Time: |
Sat, November 4, 2000 at 9:06 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Deferred Income |
Message: |
|
Julie,Deferred income is
the ancillary concept to the revenue disparity you were asking about before.
I have not looked at all the applications in great detail, but I am confident that
all of the financial models for all of the applications include something of this
nature. To continue the same example I used in the prior post, when I send
a $200 check to the NY Times for a years subscription from October 2000 to September
2001, they recognize ~$17/month in revenue. Now, since the NY Times received
$200 in cash (an asset)in October, but they have not earned 11/12 of it (they still
have to send me the paper for the next 11 months), 11/12 of $200 is deferred income
at the end of October (or ~$183). The next month they 'recognize' $17 more
dollars, and the unearned (or deferred) revenue decreases by the same amount. I
hope this helps. On another note, I happen to disagree with you on the utility of
a prospective ".nom" TLD. My guess is it wuld not be confused with ".com" despite
the phonetic similarity, the reason I feel this way is I don't think it is positioning
itself to compete with ".com". The ".com" is in place mainly for commercial
use and is where I think internet users will default to looking for that purpose
(although, due to the current lack of choices, it is very generic). Having
a .nom TLD is designed to be used by individuals for their personal web homes, I
don't think the average internet user will visit the ".nom" TLD for commercial purpose,
so, although apple.nom or business.nom will probably be bought, they wouldn't have
a lot of cybersquatting value. I may be a little biased towars these ".nom" and
".pro" applications, because the accountant in me appreciates the low price they
offer ($3.50). I happen to think a low barrier of entry for personal web pages
is important, and I appreciate this Consortium offerng a much lower fee than any
of the other applications I have looked at. David
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .pro Application by the dotPRO Consortium Moderator, October 7 @ 10:07 PM (12/60)
- tech view of .nom techchick, November 4 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
- dotPRO Consortium Walter Bergfeld, November 4 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)
- .pro! jedrink24, November 3 @ 5:39 PM (2/5)
- ICANN, please, approving dotPRO is a NO-BRAINER TLDdaddy, November 3 @ 2:05 AM (1/1)
- I vote for dotPro BionicBro, November 3 @ 1:49 AM (0/0)
- Organization or Chaos? Jennifer Sun, November 3 @ 1:43 AM (3/3)
- .Pro! Jer072, November 2 @ 2:43 AM (1/2)
- DotPro Consortium tiger74, November 2 @ 2:08 AM (1/14)
- The internet should be a utility mayor, November 1 @ 6:07 AM (0/0)
- I beg to differ spamela, October 27 @ 12:45 AM (1/20)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
- Dot Pro CONsortium Julie, October 15 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy