Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
phil Browning |
Date/Time: |
Thu, November 2, 2000 at 6:31 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows NT 5.0 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
? |
Message: |
|
Julie I was looking at some of your other posts (its
pasted below in the text area) andI was surprised that you are ready to pay $2,500,000
for .tel, .pro and .nom...... suggesting that you want to hang onto some of the better
words- sports,news etc....... yet on the dotPro discussion you question .tv ethics
for trying to capture the same value for .tv domains. I will go read the dotpro
application in greater detail to dig into your concerns. But I have to say they seem
to be founded more from self interest than anything else. I wish I had access to
.tv finances (which I am sure ICANN will have). But to my best understanding these
guys at idealab have agreed to pay $50 million to Tuvalu over some years......so
the money they will have to pay is already decided. It does'nt seem to have anything
to do with .tv level of sales at all. So your conspiracy theory does not make
sense to me. But I could be wrong ofcourse. I don't know much about these applications
so I cannot sit in judgement here but my feeling is that ICANN will have a pretty
clear game plan for how they want the new gTLDs sold since they do not wish to allow
for extraordinary riches to any of the applicants. Its logical to me that they
will want to give it to some one who has the ability to sell these things well. And
to provide a stable registry. I wish ICANN had drawn out the criteria a little
better. Phil Dear ICANN, Our Company would like to offer you $2,500,000
for the Rights to the .TEL, .PRO and .NOM TLDs. This offer is more money than all
47 applications put together! Why? It's simple.. We would own all of the URL's in
these TLD's and will easily recoup our investment. Since we do not have any technical
capabilities we would allow all of the other applicants the right to distribute them
on an equal non discriminatory basis. We will follow any rules and procedures you
suggest. Of course we will keep all of the single digit URLs and some of the generic
names such as Bank, Sports, News, Health, Movies, Golf etc, as some of the current
applicants propose. Our offer is intended to illustrate that you are planning
to hand over the keys to a business opportunity worth Multi-Millions of Dollars to
a Private, For Profit Driven Company for the meager sum of $50,000!???? If
ICANN is not interested in our proposal we will extend the offer to whoever they
end up selecting. A combined $2,350,000 profit for the 3 companies selected. Heck
we'll give them each $1,000,000. I guarantee none will accept because the lure of
becomming authorized cybersquatters is too appealing and profitable. You can give
them away for $50,000 or you can accept our offer of $2,500,000. It's up to you.
(Should any of the applicants protest your awarding us the 3 TLDs for $2,500,000
we will personally refund their $50,000 application fee.)
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .pro Application by the dotPRO Consortium Moderator, October 7 @ 10:07 PM (12/60)
- tech view of .nom techchick, November 4 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
- dotPRO Consortium Walter Bergfeld, November 4 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)
- .pro! jedrink24, November 3 @ 5:39 PM (2/5)
- ICANN, please, approving dotPRO is a NO-BRAINER TLDdaddy, November 3 @ 2:05 AM (1/1)
- I vote for dotPro BionicBro, November 3 @ 1:49 AM (0/0)
- Organization or Chaos? Jennifer Sun, November 3 @ 1:43 AM (3/3)
- .Pro! Jer072, November 2 @ 2:43 AM (1/2)
- DotPro Consortium tiger74, November 2 @ 2:08 AM (1/14)
- The internet should be a utility mayor, November 1 @ 6:07 AM (0/0)
- I beg to differ spamela, October 27 @ 12:45 AM (1/20)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
- Dot Pro CONsortium Julie, October 15 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy