reply to time frame

Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: Matt Simons

Date/Time: Thu, November 2, 2000 at 3:51 AM GMT

Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows NT 5.0

Score: 5

Subject: reply to time frame

Message:

I think that the time frame in mind is sometime around or right after the ICANN conference in los angeles. So the decisions should be made in the next couple of weeks.

Message Thread:

.pro Application by the dotPRO Consortium — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:07 PM (12/60)

tech view of .nom — techchick, November 4 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
dotPRO Consortium — Walter Bergfeld, November 4 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)

reply to walter — fredHanks, November 4 @ 2:03 AM (0/0)

.pro! — jedrink24, November 3 @ 5:39 PM (2/5)

price discrimination — fredHanks, November 4 @ 2:06 AM (0/0)
Ability to pay? — PHXbird, November 3 @ 6:16 PM (1/3)

"acceptance" — tomam, November 3 @ 6:40 PM (1/2)

Reply — PHXbird, November 3 @ 6:58 PM (1/1)

number of professionals on the net — tomam, November 3 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)

ICANN, please, approving dotPRO is a NO-BRAINER — TLDdaddy, November 3 @ 2:05 AM (1/1)

:^D — bldigrn, November 3 @ 2:59 AM (0/0)

I vote for dotPro — BionicBro, November 3 @ 1:49 AM (0/0)
Organization or Chaos? — Jennifer Sun, November 3 @ 1:43 AM (3/3)

to jennifer (not impressed?) — Hastings, November 6 @ 12:58 AM (0/0)
cross matching dotTV with other applicants — fred hanks, November 5 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)
partial agreement — PinkFish, November 3 @ 2:54 AM (0/0)

.Pro! — Jer072, November 2 @ 2:43 AM (1/2)

reply to .pro! — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 3:49 AM (1/1)

to Matt Simmons — Jim Chen, November 2 @ 9:01 PM (0/0)

DotPro Consortium — tiger74, November 2 @ 2:08 AM (1/14)

time frame? — Skull, November 2 @ 2:19 AM (2/13)

dotpro application — SamSingh, November 2 @ 7:49 PM (2/11)

One thought on .pro — gt515, November 3 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)
reply to Sam — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 7:56 PM (1/9)

to Matt — SamSingh, November 2 @ 7:58 PM (1/8)

Lycos — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 8:03 PM (1/7)

mgmt team — SamSingh, November 2 @ 8:04 PM (1/6)

reply to mgmt team — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 8:09 PM (1/5)

still on mgmt team — SamSingh, November 2 @ 8:10 PM (1/4)

more on management team — bldigrn, November 2 @ 8:19 PM (1/3)

reply to bldigrn — SamSingh, November 2 @ 8:35 PM (1/2)

management matters — tomam, November 2 @ 8:39 PM (1/1)

reply-mgmt matters — Jim Chen, November 2 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)

reply to time frame — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)

The internet should be a utility — mayor, November 1 @ 6:07 AM (0/0)
I beg to differ — spamela, October 27 @ 12:45 AM (1/20)

REPLY to SPAMELA RE: Hoarding By .TV — julie, October 28 @ 9:54 AM (2/19)

reply to Julie — Bob Singer, October 30 @ 6:27 PM (1/15)

Back to you, Bob... — julie, October 31 @ 11:28 AM (3/14)

reply to Julie — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 3:44 AM (0/0)
When — Matt Simons, November 2 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
Reply to Julie — Phil Browning, November 2 @ 12:00 AM (2/11)

Reply to Phil re: $14.33 Avg .TV Domain Price? — julie, November 2 @ 4:06 PM (4/8)

ha! — fredHanks, November 4 @ 2:08 AM (0/0)
Julie- please do some homework — bldigrn, November 2 @ 6:52 PM (1/2)

Homework — julie, November 5 @ 6:36 AM (1/1)

mgmt stake — fred hanks, November 5 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)

? — phil Browning, November 2 @ 6:31 PM (1/2)

Thankyou David — julie, November 4 @ 8:07 AM (1/1)

Deferred Income — David Coombs, November 4 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)

Accounting Lesson — David Coombs, November 2 @ 6:24 PM (0/0)

to Phil — lindaw, November 2 @ 1:04 AM (1/1)

reply to Linda — wayanna, November 2 @ 1:50 AM (0/0)

please help me understand "hoarding" — bldigrn, October 30 @ 5:59 PM (1/2)

Reply to Blondie — julie, October 31 @ 12:39 AM (1/1)

reply to Julie — bldigrn, October 31 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
Dot Pro CONsortium — Julie, October 15 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)

Hoarding — RoscoePico, November 2 @ 1:26 AM (1/1)

vokacuca — Carla, November 2 @ 2:07 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy