Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
julie |
Date/Time: |
Sat, November 4, 2000 at 8:07 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Thankyou David |
Message: |
|
David, So there is somebody in this thread who can
answer a simple question with an unemotional, logical response. If as you suggest,
accounting methods may account for the financial statement discrepancies in the DOT
NOM/PRO applications DOT TV might have put speculation to rest when it was first
brought up by Hunter in the Dot Nom Thread back on Oct 27th with a simple statement
such as yours. In any case it is nice to know that in at least one accountants opinion,
there is a plausible explanation. Thankyou! Since I am not an accountant there
is something in the pro forma scenarios called deferred income. I was wondering if
you could give me brief explanation of what that means in light of the fact
that Dot TV says in it's application "Initial license fees are paid up-front and
in cash".
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .pro Application by the dotPRO Consortium Moderator, October 7 @ 10:07 PM (12/60)
- tech view of .nom techchick, November 4 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
- dotPRO Consortium Walter Bergfeld, November 4 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)
- .pro! jedrink24, November 3 @ 5:39 PM (2/5)
- ICANN, please, approving dotPRO is a NO-BRAINER TLDdaddy, November 3 @ 2:05 AM (1/1)
- I vote for dotPro BionicBro, November 3 @ 1:49 AM (0/0)
- Organization or Chaos? Jennifer Sun, November 3 @ 1:43 AM (3/3)
- .Pro! Jer072, November 2 @ 2:43 AM (1/2)
- DotPro Consortium tiger74, November 2 @ 2:08 AM (1/14)
- The internet should be a utility mayor, November 1 @ 6:07 AM (0/0)
- I beg to differ spamela, October 27 @ 12:45 AM (1/20)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
- Dot Pro CONsortium Julie, October 15 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy