Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
sharjeel |
Date/Time: |
Fri, November 3, 2000 at 6:44 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows NT |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Few Positive Points in Regards to CORE Application |
Message: |
|
1-CORE membership concept appropriate for registry -Open
- new members may join based on objective and non-discriminatory criteria -Fair
- equal treatment of all registrars in terms of voting pow -Not-for-profit shared
registry structure avoids empire-building on registry level2-Privacy protection
in line with .nom's role of a personal TLD -CORE proposal in line with European
privacy laws -Still ensures that registrants can be reached by parties with a
legitimate interest but enables registrants to avoid the publication of personalinformation
concerning them 3-Balanced approach to trademark protection -Fair balance of
individual's rights and trademark interests -Proposal avoids mechanisms that would
be costly to enforce -Process could be extended to function for several TLDs 4-Value
of two-dot policy -Two dot policy allows a greater number of registrants to find
a memorable domain name -Enables users to avoid hyphens (difficult to find
on keyboards)and still have use separated name elements -Can be applied to
future e-commerce TLDs such as barbaras.computer.shop 5-Low-cost Registration and
Enforcement -Mechanisms envisaged are consistent with the intended use of .nom
domains as low-cost, long-term personal identifiers -CORE proposes electronic
complaint registration tools that combine the advantage of service through registrars
and standardized procedures.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .nom Application by CORE Internet Council of Registrars Moderator, October 7 @ 10:11 PM (15/49)
- Support for the .NOM proposal from CORE JMB, November 5 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
- Questionable financial & business capabilies griffiths, November 5 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)
- Exellent CORE application for .NOM kasia, November 4 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)
- Few Positive Points in Regards to CORE Application sharjeel, November 3 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)
- Question... PHXbird, November 3 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
- Support to CORE .nom proposal RETEVISION, November 2 @ 8:49 AM (0/0)
- CORE application is good for the Internet ksoussi, November 2 @ 1:07 AM (1/1)
- How does the applicant propose handling multiple people with the same name? hunter, October 27 @ 3:47 AM (1/4)
- CORE should be required to accept due process in US ALLDNS, October 22 @ 5:20 AM (1/1)
- Why is CORE Hiding Its Financials? Need2Know, October 20 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)
- CORE's application for .NOM now online! nike, October 19 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:23 PM (0/0)
- CORE's proposal for .NOM nike, October 17 @ 2:04 AM (0/0)
- Why don't CORE stop Pre-registrations for .nom, from it's CO-Founder Knipp.de? Rebeka, October 16 @ 6:24 PM (2/4)
- Is CORE Nonprofit or FOR Profit.....Please Respond..Someone from CORE....... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 4:01 AM (2/24)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy