Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
griffiths |
Date/Time: |
Sun, November 5, 2000 at 5:02 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Questionable financial & business capabilies |
Message: |
|
I believe that the time is
right for a personal name registry, however this proposal seems to have some challenges
associated with it. While CORE should have the necessary capabilities to operate
a registry, this doesn't seem to be apparant from their application. The technical
implementation section of the application appears to be woefully inadequate in order
to make a true assessment of their capabilities, although it is always possible that
the full technical details have had a problem being posted. Not surprisingly given
the nature of CORE there is very little innovative and creative elements in their
proposition. Their marketing plan using affiliates and registrars recognises
the nature of the market, however does little to lead and direct the brand and PR
opportunties. In terms of how this will be financed, charging a levy to their membership
would appear to contravene the objectives of CORE. Furthermore, it would appear
from the statements given, that in the event that the levy or voluntary contributions
were sufficient, a compulsory charge would be made to registrars. No details
on this are provided, how it will be allocated, enforced or collected. To what
extent do the membership of CORE support this? Have they provided an underwritten
guarantee to fund all the possible financial losses that the registry may incur?
This is critically important, as no details are provided as to what the total funding
requirements for this application are. Therefore it can only be assumed that
CORE and is backers are prepared to provide unlimited financial backing which seems
improbable. In balance however, the concept of providing a viewable queue on registrations
would seem to be an excellent concept that all successful applicants should be compelled
to introduce.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .nom Application by CORE Internet Council of Registrars Moderator, October 7 @ 10:11 PM (15/49)
- Support for the .NOM proposal from CORE JMB, November 5 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
- Questionable financial & business capabilies griffiths, November 5 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)
- Exellent CORE application for .NOM kasia, November 4 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)
- Few Positive Points in Regards to CORE Application sharjeel, November 3 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)
- Question... PHXbird, November 3 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
- Support to CORE .nom proposal RETEVISION, November 2 @ 8:49 AM (0/0)
- CORE application is good for the Internet ksoussi, November 2 @ 1:07 AM (1/1)
- How does the applicant propose handling multiple people with the same name? hunter, October 27 @ 3:47 AM (1/4)
- CORE should be required to accept due process in US ALLDNS, October 22 @ 5:20 AM (1/1)
- Why is CORE Hiding Its Financials? Need2Know, October 20 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)
- CORE's application for .NOM now online! nike, October 19 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:23 PM (0/0)
- CORE's proposal for .NOM nike, October 17 @ 2:04 AM (0/0)
- Why don't CORE stop Pre-registrations for .nom, from it's CO-Founder Knipp.de? Rebeka, October 16 @ 6:24 PM (2/4)
- Is CORE Nonprofit or FOR Profit.....Please Respond..Someone from CORE....... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 4:01 AM (2/24)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy