Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
Pistoff |
Date/Time: |
Wed, October 18, 2000 at 5:45 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community |
Message: |
|
I would like to elaborate further regarding my previous posting shown above in the
general section. Sorry for the format, but I felt that applying the case study
method made the most sense. It's an effective way of communicating both the
issues and solutions. Thanks! To ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Central
Issue: The decision making process has not been sufficiently announced to the
outside world. Such inaction is especially troublesome given the fact that
it's taking place during a time when the media's attention is being stretched thin
by several other important events. ICANN needs to compete more effectively
for media coverage.Recommended Course of Action: Extend the decision making
process beyond the U.S. Presidential Elections by a few weeks. Extending the
decision making process would provide a more equitable platform for the following
reasons: 1)many more individuals will have an opportunity to participate; and 2)
the applicants will be treated more equitably since some of their postings were delayed
(for whatever reason) thereby allowing all applicants to enjoy the same amount of
coverage time. ICANN can also print ads in the press and run announcements
on the radio, both very effective mediums in reaching out to the public. Such
announcements can be done quickly and affordably. As for cost, ICANN pulled
in about $2.35 million (47 applicants x $50k). I think the organization can
afford this undertaking given what's at stake. Conclusion: We've waited over
four years to reach this point. What's a few more weeks given the amount of
money, time, and effort that has been invested thus far on expanding the infrastructure
of the internet. Significant Factors (not all inclusive): 1) Many individuals
are posting messages of an emotional nature. This is being done, in part, because
there is limited time in which to debate the complex issues. This, in turn,
has led to a sense of desparation for those involved thus far. 2) The U.S. Presidential
Election and the middle east crises (both obviously very important issues) have absorbed
a significant portion of the media's attention from this very important issue.
3) The World Series is upon us, and as such, it will absorb an additional amount
of media coverage, especially since the games will be held in New York (good for
New York). 4) Several other good reasons which I've neglected to include in the
interest of time (but please feel free to add any points that I've missed if you
so desire). Thank you for taking the time to hear me out.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .biz, etc. Application by Abacus America, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:37 PM (50/100)
- Whatever happenned to the dot shops chrisn, December 16 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
- ABACUS - Great Concept ak, November 6 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
- USA families mikes, November 6 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
- yes to FAM henry, November 5 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)
- .fam andyG, November 5 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)
- Out of 200 proposed TLDs only one is COOL kevinY , November 5 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
- .cool kevinY , November 5 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
- Family JamesZ , November 5 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- I Agree (.FAM and .XXX) tw, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- Families need .FAM sl, November 5 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
- support for .COOL tn, November 5 @ 9:29 PM (1/1)
- .COOL great idea AFree , November 5 @ 9:21 PM (1/1)
- This is the only application that can reach profitability within the first month - HOW? griffiths, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- IOD issue useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:47 AM (0/0)
- .cool will just be a fad YankeeFan, November 3 @ 3:31 AM (2/2)
- .XXX a poor idea ipguy, November 3 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- Does Pedro work for Abacus? YankeeFan, November 1 @ 8:03 AM (3/8)
- Abacus got it right pedro, November 1 @ 4:26 AM (0/0)
- Yes to .FAM AndrewK , October 31 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)
- Why Abacus for .biz ChrisK , October 31 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
- About dot .biz and .inc dimitrov@mailcity.com, October 31 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)
- MSNBC.com Pole domainking, October 31 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
- .COOL domainking, October 30 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
- Trying to be cool nickl, October 27 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)
- cool jamesh, October 27 @ 7:31 PM (1/1)
- .fam mikeS, October 27 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- It is very important for ICANN to be fair to the public alexj, October 26 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
- To: saynotoabacus useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)
- EXPERIENCE WITH ABACUS, INC. vldiaz, October 26 @ 3:07 AM (0/0)
- Abacus App peniel, October 25 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- I like .cool ChrisK , October 25 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- Different policies for ".biz" portion Josh Kyle, October 24 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)
- Anyone know who else has it ready to go? useyourhead, October 23 @ 5:58 AM (1/9)
- .xxx MikeS, October 22 @ 10:31 PM (2/2)
- Young people nickl, October 22 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)
- I agree with jandl bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
- BID SYSTEM UNFAIR to UNRICH stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:32 PM (2/2)
- Sorry for the excessive use of exclamation marks. My only intent was to draw your attention to SayNoToAbacus, October 21 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)
- WWW.NAMES4EVER.COM Domainking, October 20 @ 7:35 PM (2/2)
- To saynotoabacus use your head, October 20 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
- .biz A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:48 PM (1/1)
- Comments sjk, October 19 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- Way to go Abacus! use your head, October 19 @ 6:19 AM (1/4)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
- Abacus is trying to BUY your support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)
- We want to see your application emc2, October 17 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)
- .fam is needed dconder, October 16 @ 9:11 PM (1/10)
- Simply unworkable jandl, October 16 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
- .BIZ applications korskarn, October 15 @ 4:43 PM (2/4)
- Where is your application? jandl, October 14 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy