Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
A. Kinney |
Date/Time: |
Thu, October 19, 2000 at 4:48 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.08 using Windows 95 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
.biz |
Message: |
|
The introduction of a ".biz" TLD would create substantial confusion among Internet
users and also interfere with the ".bz" ccTLD and the existing rights of the country
of Belize due to identical pronunciations and the likely meanings under which each
TLD would be marketed. As has been seen with verbal references to domain names
using ".com," ".org," and ".gov" TLDs, the TLD portions of Internet addresses are
pronounced as the first syllable of "commercial," "organization," and "government"
respectively, rather than stating each letter separately. It is therefore expected
that verbal references to ".bz" or ".biz" domain names would pronounce the
TLD portion as "BIZ." Due to the identical pronunciations, Internet users hearing
of a ".bz" or ".biz" website would be confused as to which TLD must be used to locate
a resource. Thus, an Internet user would have to first ensure he or she has
the correct TLD spelling before accessing a domain name with a "BIZ" TLD that
was orally communicated. If each registry contains domain names that are also
registered in the other registries, an Internet user may be further confused by inadvertently
going to an active website in the wrong registry. The country of Belize
has recently licensed its ccTLD for marketing domain names to businesses. The
present application for ".biz" also specifies an intent to target and license domain
names to businesses. Due to the identical pronunciations and business connotations
associated with ".biz" and ".bz," Internet users would be confused as to which TLD
must be used to locate a business related resource. The granting of a
".biz" TLD would therefore not enhance the diversity and services available under
the DNS but rather threaten them by allowing confusion to be created. Since a
".biz" registrar would market domain names to business customers, its co-existence
with the ".bz" registrar would also diminish the value of domain names registered
with either the ".biz" or ".bz" registrars. This diminished value would make
it difficult for either ".biz" or ".bz" registrars to successfully compete against
other TLD registrars, thereby frustrating ICANN's overall objective for expanding
the list of generic TLDs in a manner which preserves the stability of the Internet.
A ".biz" TLD also would not benefit the Internet community or sensibly enhance
the domain name system (DNS) as identified in the Criteria for Assessing TLD Proposals.
A ".biz" registrar would likely target the same businesses and provide similar
services as a ".bz" registrar, thereby only duplicating what is already available
rather than create distinctive services for the diversity of needs of Internet users
and enhance the DNS. Thus, a ".biz" TLD would not meet any needs which are
not already met by the existing ".bz" registry. Abacus America's application for
".biz" should therefore be rejected.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .biz, etc. Application by Abacus America, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:37 PM (50/100)
- Whatever happenned to the dot shops chrisn, December 16 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
- ABACUS - Great Concept ak, November 6 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
- USA families mikes, November 6 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
- yes to FAM henry, November 5 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)
- .fam andyG, November 5 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)
- Out of 200 proposed TLDs only one is COOL kevinY , November 5 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
- .cool kevinY , November 5 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
- Family JamesZ , November 5 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- I Agree (.FAM and .XXX) tw, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- Families need .FAM sl, November 5 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
- support for .COOL tn, November 5 @ 9:29 PM (1/1)
- .COOL great idea AFree , November 5 @ 9:21 PM (1/1)
- This is the only application that can reach profitability within the first month - HOW? griffiths, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- IOD issue useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:47 AM (0/0)
- .cool will just be a fad YankeeFan, November 3 @ 3:31 AM (2/2)
- .XXX a poor idea ipguy, November 3 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- Does Pedro work for Abacus? YankeeFan, November 1 @ 8:03 AM (3/8)
- Abacus got it right pedro, November 1 @ 4:26 AM (0/0)
- Yes to .FAM AndrewK , October 31 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)
- Why Abacus for .biz ChrisK , October 31 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
- About dot .biz and .inc dimitrov@mailcity.com, October 31 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)
- MSNBC.com Pole domainking, October 31 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
- .COOL domainking, October 30 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
- Trying to be cool nickl, October 27 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)
- cool jamesh, October 27 @ 7:31 PM (1/1)
- .fam mikeS, October 27 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- It is very important for ICANN to be fair to the public alexj, October 26 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
- To: saynotoabacus useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)
- EXPERIENCE WITH ABACUS, INC. vldiaz, October 26 @ 3:07 AM (0/0)
- Abacus App peniel, October 25 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- I like .cool ChrisK , October 25 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- Different policies for ".biz" portion Josh Kyle, October 24 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)
- Anyone know who else has it ready to go? useyourhead, October 23 @ 5:58 AM (1/9)
- .xxx MikeS, October 22 @ 10:31 PM (2/2)
- Young people nickl, October 22 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)
- I agree with jandl bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
- BID SYSTEM UNFAIR to UNRICH stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:32 PM (2/2)
- Sorry for the excessive use of exclamation marks. My only intent was to draw your attention to SayNoToAbacus, October 21 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)
- WWW.NAMES4EVER.COM Domainking, October 20 @ 7:35 PM (2/2)
- To saynotoabacus use your head, October 20 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
- .biz A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:48 PM (1/1)
- Comments sjk, October 19 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- Way to go Abacus! use your head, October 19 @ 6:19 AM (1/4)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
- Abacus is trying to BUY your support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)
- We want to see your application emc2, October 17 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)
- .fam is needed dconder, October 16 @ 9:11 PM (1/10)
- Simply unworkable jandl, October 16 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
- .BIZ applications korskarn, October 15 @ 4:43 PM (2/4)
- Where is your application? jandl, October 14 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy