Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
Satori |
Date/Time: |
Wed, October 25, 2000 at 8:46 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows NT 5.0 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
.Sex TLD |
Message: |
|
Personally I support the .sex TLD, and also like the .xxx. There is a concern
that certain TLD's such as .kids, could have individual names that are really not
for kids, maybe some child pediphile, and sites that do not comply for the intended
use. Maybe this concept exists now, but what might go a long way here, is some
kind of disclosure guarantee for every suggested TLD, similiar to a newsgroup FAQ,
to which daily name assignment adheres. If the TLD registrar breaks this agreement,
and will not correct their mistakingly assigned name, or turn off the individual
who does not comply, then they lose their bond for the TLD, and the right to resell
it. Ex:, I just purchased personal.sex, dating.sex, and personals.sex. I
should not have been able to purchase these names without agreeing to a form of intended
use, with guidelines, or at least have an idea of what this TLD is about. If
I speak english, .sex is apparent, but what if people start putting sites in there
advertising pound cakes, because the nickname in belgum is sex cakes. Does't
this sort of defeat the purpose of the TLD? So I like the idea of the TLD's and
it is just a crap shoot so who cares at this point until they are fully resolveable.
I think that any name should exist, to a certain degree. But there should be
manadatory compliance to a system for TLD's so they they cannot be misused by nefarous
people. Then the TLD would be no better than Internic giving .org to every
cat and dog who wanted the name. Really, Internic is no better. So if TLD's
registrars want to fight them, they gotta create some rules for themselves to live
by, that cannot be broken like Internic did theirs. I am sure that when any one
individual, or oganization, holds the keys to the kingdom, that they do not like
to relinquish power. These poeople need to relax and take some prozac, and
find a creative way to ensure everyone is happy. (J)
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .biz, etc. Application by Abacus America, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:37 PM (50/100)
- Whatever happenned to the dot shops chrisn, December 16 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
- ABACUS - Great Concept ak, November 6 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
- USA families mikes, November 6 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
- yes to FAM henry, November 5 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)
- .fam andyG, November 5 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)
- Out of 200 proposed TLDs only one is COOL kevinY , November 5 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
- .cool kevinY , November 5 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
- Family JamesZ , November 5 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- I Agree (.FAM and .XXX) tw, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- Families need .FAM sl, November 5 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
- support for .COOL tn, November 5 @ 9:29 PM (1/1)
- .COOL great idea AFree , November 5 @ 9:21 PM (1/1)
- This is the only application that can reach profitability within the first month - HOW? griffiths, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- IOD issue useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:47 AM (0/0)
- .cool will just be a fad YankeeFan, November 3 @ 3:31 AM (2/2)
- .XXX a poor idea ipguy, November 3 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- Does Pedro work for Abacus? YankeeFan, November 1 @ 8:03 AM (3/8)
- Abacus got it right pedro, November 1 @ 4:26 AM (0/0)
- Yes to .FAM AndrewK , October 31 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)
- Why Abacus for .biz ChrisK , October 31 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
- About dot .biz and .inc dimitrov@mailcity.com, October 31 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)
- MSNBC.com Pole domainking, October 31 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
- .COOL domainking, October 30 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
- Trying to be cool nickl, October 27 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)
- cool jamesh, October 27 @ 7:31 PM (1/1)
- .fam mikeS, October 27 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- It is very important for ICANN to be fair to the public alexj, October 26 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
- To: saynotoabacus useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)
- EXPERIENCE WITH ABACUS, INC. vldiaz, October 26 @ 3:07 AM (0/0)
- Abacus App peniel, October 25 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- I like .cool ChrisK , October 25 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- Different policies for ".biz" portion Josh Kyle, October 24 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)
- Anyone know who else has it ready to go? useyourhead, October 23 @ 5:58 AM (1/9)
- .xxx MikeS, October 22 @ 10:31 PM (2/2)
- Young people nickl, October 22 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)
- I agree with jandl bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
- BID SYSTEM UNFAIR to UNRICH stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:32 PM (2/2)
- Sorry for the excessive use of exclamation marks. My only intent was to draw your attention to SayNoToAbacus, October 21 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)
- WWW.NAMES4EVER.COM Domainking, October 20 @ 7:35 PM (2/2)
- To saynotoabacus use your head, October 20 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
- .biz A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:48 PM (1/1)
- Comments sjk, October 19 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- Way to go Abacus! use your head, October 19 @ 6:19 AM (1/4)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
- Abacus is trying to BUY your support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)
- We want to see your application emc2, October 17 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)
- .fam is needed dconder, October 16 @ 9:11 PM (1/10)
- Simply unworkable jandl, October 16 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
- .BIZ applications korskarn, October 15 @ 4:43 PM (2/4)
- Where is your application? jandl, October 14 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy