Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
wiredz |
Date/Time: |
Wed, October 25, 2000 at 10:56 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Opera V4.02 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Refer to the updates ICANN just posted on their web site |
Message: |
|
anonymous, you wrote in the ICANN Forum: >How many people have already registered
.web's with you? How many are >betting on you to win the .web? Maybe ICANN would
see how you are >trying to win their votes, no riches for you my friend Dear
Sir, You may Refer to this link below titled Memorandum of Decision in Image Online
Design, Inv. v. CORE Ass'n, which *clearly* states IOD was the luser in the lawsuit
against the CORE Association. Also, take note that this shows ICANN will select
based on merits of application, and not by prior use or trademarks or pioneering
or even IANA Authorization. And clearly, Afilias.com's application is the BEST
because they propose to charge only $5.95 at the registry, and Afilias.com plans
to be a registry not registrar, and from the very begining it allows competition
among ICANN Registrars, unlike the IOD Proposal that Sucks because it charges $15
at the registry and IOD wants to monopolize the TLD from the very beginning to gain
market advantage over its competitors (the other ICANN registrars). Since Registry
level is a wholesaler business model, registry's must charge the lowest pricing.
While NSI may be a monopoly and some say a pricing structure of a monopoly should
not be followed, but then if IOD markets at $15, NSI will be encouraged to rise up
their $6 to $15, and soon all other registries will do the same. Who will suffer
- the registrars or end-users? Of course not the registrars who only markup prices
before sale but those who suffer will be the end-user like you and me. Also, take
note that once Afilias.com is operational as a registry, you and I and other people
can go to the many competiting ICANN Registrars and order a .Web name at the lowest
retail price. I hope that helped. --Eugene Kang
|
| |
Link: |
Memorandum of Decision in Image Online Design, Inv. v. CORE Ass'n |
Message Thread:
- .biz, etc. Application by Abacus America, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:37 PM (50/100)
- Whatever happenned to the dot shops chrisn, December 16 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
- ABACUS - Great Concept ak, November 6 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
- USA families mikes, November 6 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
- yes to FAM henry, November 5 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)
- .fam andyG, November 5 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)
- Out of 200 proposed TLDs only one is COOL kevinY , November 5 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
- .cool kevinY , November 5 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
- Family JamesZ , November 5 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
- I Agree (.FAM and .XXX) tw, November 5 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- Families need .FAM sl, November 5 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
- support for .COOL tn, November 5 @ 9:29 PM (1/1)
- .COOL great idea AFree , November 5 @ 9:21 PM (1/1)
- This is the only application that can reach profitability within the first month - HOW? griffiths, November 5 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- IOD issue useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:47 AM (0/0)
- .cool will just be a fad YankeeFan, November 3 @ 3:31 AM (2/2)
- .XXX a poor idea ipguy, November 3 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- Does Pedro work for Abacus? YankeeFan, November 1 @ 8:03 AM (3/8)
- Abacus got it right pedro, November 1 @ 4:26 AM (0/0)
- Yes to .FAM AndrewK , October 31 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)
- Why Abacus for .biz ChrisK , October 31 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
- About dot .biz and .inc dimitrov@mailcity.com, October 31 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)
- MSNBC.com Pole domainking, October 31 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
- .COOL domainking, October 30 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
- Trying to be cool nickl, October 27 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)
- cool jamesh, October 27 @ 7:31 PM (1/1)
- .fam mikeS, October 27 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- It is very important for ICANN to be fair to the public alexj, October 26 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
- To: saynotoabacus useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)
- EXPERIENCE WITH ABACUS, INC. vldiaz, October 26 @ 3:07 AM (0/0)
- Abacus App peniel, October 25 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- I like .cool ChrisK , October 25 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- Different policies for ".biz" portion Josh Kyle, October 24 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)
- Anyone know who else has it ready to go? useyourhead, October 23 @ 5:58 AM (1/9)
- .xxx MikeS, October 22 @ 10:31 PM (2/2)
- Young people nickl, October 22 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)
- I agree with jandl bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
- BID SYSTEM UNFAIR to UNRICH stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:32 PM (2/2)
- Sorry for the excessive use of exclamation marks. My only intent was to draw your attention to SayNoToAbacus, October 21 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)
- WWW.NAMES4EVER.COM Domainking, October 20 @ 7:35 PM (2/2)
- To saynotoabacus use your head, October 20 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
- .biz A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:48 PM (1/1)
- Comments sjk, October 19 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- Way to go Abacus! use your head, October 19 @ 6:19 AM (1/4)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
- Abacus is trying to BUY your support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)
- We want to see your application emc2, October 17 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)
- .fam is needed dconder, October 16 @ 9:11 PM (1/10)
- Simply unworkable jandl, October 16 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
- .BIZ applications korskarn, October 15 @ 4:43 PM (2/4)
- Where is your application? jandl, October 14 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy