This Comment Forum is now closed. ICANN Public Comment Forum At Large Study

Background: Now that ICANN has completed the At Large membership and election process in the year 2000, it is time to launch a comprehensive study of the At Large concept, structure, and mechanisms. After discussions with many individuals who have been involved in the At Large effort, the ICANN staff made a set of recommendations about how the study might be organized, emphasizing the need for an effort that is effective, credible, and open to broad participation. At its recent meeting in Los Angeles, the ICANN Board called for public comments on the staff recommendations -- key issues include the study's structure, composition, timetable, and funding.

Call for comments: Click here to read the staff recommendations. ICANN actively invites input from any interested individual or organization. The deadline for public comments is 27 December 2000, midnight GMT/UTC.

---

• The focus of the at-large study — bsimons, 2:47 AM (0/0)

  ---

• @large study request for comments — jefsey, 2:37 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN Y DEMOCRACIA — Pompeyo, 10:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Comments on At Large — HiroHOTTA, 5:04 PM (0/0)

  ---

• No clean sheet — newcat, 2:14 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Comments on staff's recommendations — Adam Peake, 8:20 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Democracy? — jtrade, Wed 2:41 AM (0/0)

  ---

• To have a fair at-large election — sakichan, Tue 11:40 PM (0/0)

  ---

• why cant @ large members take decisions? — ajay, Mon 6:48 AM (1/1)
  • Look upon it as an indirect cyber democracy — friedrich, Mon 3:50 PM (0/0)

  ---

• A Huge Mess ... — pilot5, Sun 7:06 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Comments of CDT, Common Cause, PCMLP — rcourtney, Fri 11:42 PM (0/0)

  ---

• An Asian perspective — myunkoo kang, Fri 11:01 AM (1/1)
  • You Are Correct ... And I Might Add — pilot5, Sun 7:33 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Hoist those clean sheets and turn them into sails — Thomas Lowenhaupt, Fri 9:05 AM (0/0)

  ---

• New Domain Extensions — August, Fri 6:53 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN Member at Large — August, Fri 6:45 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Comments from the icann-europe mailing list. — roessler, Thu 3:30 PM (2/2)
  • The At-Large Counterweight — jpaul, Wed 1:47 AM (0/0)
  • Very good comment — friedrich, Mon 4:06 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Poor choice of domains, and why so few? — cyberlawyer, Thu 11:05 AM (0/0)

  ---

• At Large Study — cabell, December 19 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)

  ---

• The WPG generally agrees with the Reconsideration Request of Image Olnline Design (15  yes : 0 no) — friedrich, December 17 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN is dead — baptista, December 16 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN as a de facto PUC will benefit from elections. — Robert_Jacobson, December 16 @ 3:10 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Porn site domain suggestion — EvJohnson, December 12 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• @Large — RJGlass, December 9 @ 7:17 PM (0/0)

  ---

• This is a joke.  32 headers? — Scott H, December 8 @ 3:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• The rest of the board should be composed of At-Large Members as well — BradNeuberg, December 6 @ 7:34 PM (1/2)
  • most of the rest of the board *is* elected — wampa, December 6 @ 8:09 PM (1/1)
    • Yes, but ... — friedrich, December 6 @ 8:44 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Answers — sunshine, December 5 @ 7:34 PM (1/1)
  • YES! no more ICANN Dictatorship - it's time for an At Large ICANN!! — Rebeka, December 6 @ 4:39 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Comments article II, Section 5 of ICANN Bylaws — latinonet, December 4 @ 5:19 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Who is studying what? — Wainer, December 3 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Perhaps China And India Will Cause ICANN To Play To A Different Drummer — Mario, December 1 @ 5:26 PM (0/0)

  ---

• NSI Seems To Have A Solution For Everything!!! — Mario, November 30 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)

  ---

• It seems not only Vint Cerf is deaf, the whole ICANN is! They don't hear us! — Rebeka, November 30 @ 4:11 PM (3/5)
  • Regarding Vint Cerf — sunshine, December 5 @ 7:45 PM (0/0)
  • We like Vint Cerf.. — cello, December 1 @ 3:04 AM (0/0)
  • Most Of Us Disagree ... — pilot5, November 30 @ 5:09 PM (2/2)
    • Rebeka doesn't speak for us IOD supporters----(that is for sure!!) — Gregory W. Krajewski, December 5 @ 3:32 AM (0/0)
    • Cerf: Impressed by Affilias, with shared registry and 19 registrars. Comfortable with Affilias... — Rebeka, November 30 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Will the real ICANN please stand up. — no_confidence_vote, November 30 @ 4:46 AM (0/0)

  ---

• To disenfranchised At Large members — jmgraham, November 30 @ 3:48 AM (1/1)
  • Bullshit! My E-Mail message to the ICANN Board came through - they answered only with laughing... — Rebeka, November 30 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Answers to proposed questions — jmgraham, November 30 @ 3:22 AM (0/0)

  ---

• How sincere is ICANN? What do you think?! — Rebeka, November 29 @ 6:12 PM (1/1)
  • Acceptance of the Study Committee = Acceptance of ICANN — PHXbird, November 29 @ 9:23 PM (0/0)

  ---

• role of new At Large Directors - application fees - .web - answers to ICANNs recent questions — friedrich, November 29 @ 2:40 PM (1/1)
  • Everyone MUST READ the previous post!!!!!!!!! — first1, November 30 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN breakup case / update 11.55am UTC Wedesday 29 November 2000 — human rights law, November 29 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Committee members — jandl, November 29 @ 3:54 AM (1/1)
  • commitee to study the "role of At-Large-Directors" — friedrich, November 29 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Duh ... Of Course The ICANN Board  Should Include "At Large" Directors — pilot5, November 29 @ 1:34 AM (1/1)
  • I completely agree! — first1, November 29 @ 2:24 AM (0/0)

  ---

• At Large Members ... — davec, November 28 @ 11:15 PM (1/1)
  • Support... — PHXbird, November 29 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN must be much more democratic! Let the At Large movement grow! — Rebeka, November 28 @ 8:49 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Keep 'em elected not appointed! — dagmoon, November 28 @ 6:11 PM (0/0)

  ---

0 Fresh + 0 New + 60 Old = 60 Total headers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy