Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
momof2 |
Date/Time: |
Mon, October 16, 2000 at 6:31 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.7 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
No Way Mr. Howe |
Message: |
|
I am a single mother of 2 children and have read the application
presented by Mr. Howe. I would be very afraid if he was to receive the .kids
extension.I say that becuase he is applying for a restricted extension. They
are stating that they will use the COPPA law as a base for the foundation in
which they screen material for the Internet. Maybe Mr. Howe needs to pick up
a news paper becuase COPPA has been caught in the Legal system for quite a long
time and has yet to see the light of day. He also states. " registrants must
consent to an annual audit by an unpartisan Policy Board that will ensure they are
continually providing child-safe content and products on their sites." How is this
board going to review 1000's of web sites everyday and every year? Who is going
to pay for that? I do not know who Mr. Howe is from Adam and I certianly do not
want to have him or his "board" deciding what is safe for my children on the internet.
There beliefes may not be mine and who are they to play the Internet God for all
the children of the world? This extension must be unrestricted or it
will surley die and thus our kids will remain at risk. What also bothers me is
the "Glamour list" of 1000 to 2000 names that will be auctioned off. If I have
a legitimate trademark to one of those names listed on that "glamour list" I should
not have to bid for it. Why should I have to possibly lose my legal right to
my trademark name becuase I may not be able to afford the highest .kids bid.
It is completely unfair. This application infurates me as a parent and as a business
woman. Restricting .kids is saying that Mr. Howe knows better than I on what
is good and safe for my kids on the Internet.
I am completely behind ICANN in selecting
.kids as an extension. It would be very sad to see Mr. Howe and his unthought
out plan get the privledge of being the registry. I do belive that an unrestricted
.kids extension will have to decide on how to assist the Internet Communuty's on
keeping adult material away from kids. Restricting the name is not the answer.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .kids Application by .KIDS Domains, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:18 PM (49/75)
- Kids Domain Needs to Happen LarsTheViking, November 6 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)
- BETTER CONTENT FOR OUR KIDS.... IT'S TIME ! spideyg, November 5 @ 11:58 PM (0/0)
- Conclusions and Final Thoughts pagehowe, November 5 @ 11:38 PM (0/0)
- Porn in the Children's Section at the Public Library? collison, November 5 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
- We need more Page Howes Mr. Mac, November 5 @ 8:29 AM (0/0)
- a Great Idea ! starrider, November 5 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)
- Save our Kids! amiller, November 4 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)
- Remember the real issues too! nicholasmoraitis, November 4 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)
- Good Idea!! John Clyde, November 4 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
- Thanks .KIDS Domains, Inc. blueskies35, November 4 @ 3:54 AM (0/0)
- Preventative Medicine Tri-State Kids, November 4 @ 2:41 AM (0/0)
- .KIDS Domains is right on target... hms80, November 4 @ 2:40 AM (0/0)
- support.kids Fancy, November 3 @ 11:55 PM (0/0)
- Oversight is good for students Chaddilac Man, November 3 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)
- Support.KIDS Bandit, November 3 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)
- KIDS Domains, Inc. phb, November 3 @ 9:46 PM (0/0)
- support for KDI rwhoward, November 3 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
- OUR CHILDREN NEED A SAFE GREENSPACE yosemitesierra, November 3 @ 6:28 PM (0/0)
- Nonconfrontational tool for parents to exercise discretion of child's use mystwoman, November 3 @ 1:45 PM (0/0)
- kids wat, November 3 @ 12:28 AM (1/1)
- Our kids need this ant, November 2 @ 11:54 PM (0/0)
- Support of .kids domain tyty, November 2 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
- Support of .kidds bubbles, November 2 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)
- Support of .kidds domainI Kiam, November 2 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
- .kids by .Kids Domains, Inc is the BEST! Cindy, November 2 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
- .KIDS DOMAINS, INC. JoAnne , November 2 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
- Finally! I hope it works! sherig, November 2 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
- comment mo5360, November 2 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)
- Fully support concept lc, November 2 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)
- This plan is ready to work. readersvp, November 2 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)
- Why .kids is a GREAT idea! PATKATMC, November 2 @ 8:06 PM (0/0)
- IT'S NOT ABOUT RESTRICTION, IT'S ABOUT FREEDOM! kirkjayne, November 2 @ 5:05 AM (1/1)
- KDI's proposal Barbara, October 28 @ 4:30 PM (1/1)
- Excellent proposal Neo, October 27 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- .kids tld - general observations john.carr, October 27 @ 9:05 AM (1/2)
- An Outstanding Idea e.t.m., October 26 @ 4:31 AM (0/0)
- It's about kids, and it's about time! rgiusta, October 24 @ 5:52 PM (1/1)
- KidSurf Online supports this Application kidsurf, October 23 @ 11:44 PM (1/2)
- Let's see how serious ICANN is about online safety for kids... MarkF, October 23 @ 7:22 PM (1/1)
- support for .kids domain napa, October 21 @ 7:32 PM (0/0)
- we Need It bigdaddy, October 20 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)
- This is the way to go... gmmiller, October 18 @ 6:20 PM (1/1)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:16 PM (2/2)
- Congratulations! DRM, October 18 @ 5:32 AM (1/1)
- No Way Mr. Howe momof2, October 16 @ 6:31 PM (2/2)
- Nice Seperation slassre, October 16 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)
- .Kids Domains proposal and a general comment on the .Kids TLD's hedeer, October 16 @ 1:07 AM (2/2)
- .KIDS TLD Application Should Be Denied - details inside... ron10000, October 14 @ 5:25 PM (3/3)
- Where are the kids in ".kids?" nicholasmoraitis, October 14 @ 11:52 AM (3/6)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy