Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
Pistoff |
Date/Time: |
Wed, October 18, 2000 at 6:16 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community |
Message: |
|
I would like to elaborate further regarding my previous posting shown above in the
general section. Sorry for the format, but I felt that applying the case study
method made the most sense. It's an effective way of communicating both the
issues and solutions. Thanks! To ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Central
Issue: The decision making process has not been sufficiently announced to the
outside world. Such inaction is especially troublesome given the fact that
it's taking place during a time when the media's attention is being stretched thin
by several other important events. ICANN needs to compete more effectively
for media coverage.Recommended Course of Action: Extend the decision making
process beyond the U.S. Presidential Elections by a few weeks. Extending the
decision making process would provide a more equitable platform for the following
reasons: 1)many more individuals will have an opportunity to participate; and 2)
the applicants will be treated more equitably since some of their postings were delayed
(for whatever reason) thereby allowing all applicants to enjoy the same amount of
coverage time. ICANN can also print ads in the press and run announcements
on the radio, both very effective mediums in reaching out to the public. Such
announcements can be done quickly and affordably. As for cost, ICANN pulled
in about $2.35 million (47 applicants x $50k). I think the organization can
afford this undertaking given what's at stake. Conclusion: We've waited over
four years to reach this point. What's a few more weeks given the amount of
money, time, and effort that has been invested thus far on expanding the infrastructure
of the internet. Significant Factors (not all inclusive): 1) Many individuals
are posting messages of an emotional nature. This is being done, in part, because
there is limited time in which to debate the complex issues. This, in turn,
has led to a sense of desparation for those involved thus far. 2) The U.S. Presidential
Election and the middle east crises (both obviously very important issues) have absorbed
a significant portion of the media's attention from this very important issue.
3) The World Series is upon us, and as such, it will absorb an additional amount
of media coverage, especially since the games will be held in New York (good for
New York). 4) Several other good reasons which I've neglected to include in the
interest of time (but please feel free to add any points that I've missed if you
so desire). Thank you for taking the time to hear me out.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .kids Application by .KIDS Domains, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:18 PM (49/75)
- Kids Domain Needs to Happen LarsTheViking, November 6 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)
- BETTER CONTENT FOR OUR KIDS.... IT'S TIME ! spideyg, November 5 @ 11:58 PM (0/0)
- Conclusions and Final Thoughts pagehowe, November 5 @ 11:38 PM (0/0)
- Porn in the Children's Section at the Public Library? collison, November 5 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
- We need more Page Howes Mr. Mac, November 5 @ 8:29 AM (0/0)
- a Great Idea ! starrider, November 5 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)
- Save our Kids! amiller, November 4 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)
- Remember the real issues too! nicholasmoraitis, November 4 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)
- Good Idea!! John Clyde, November 4 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
- Thanks .KIDS Domains, Inc. blueskies35, November 4 @ 3:54 AM (0/0)
- Preventative Medicine Tri-State Kids, November 4 @ 2:41 AM (0/0)
- .KIDS Domains is right on target... hms80, November 4 @ 2:40 AM (0/0)
- support.kids Fancy, November 3 @ 11:55 PM (0/0)
- Oversight is good for students Chaddilac Man, November 3 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)
- Support.KIDS Bandit, November 3 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)
- KIDS Domains, Inc. phb, November 3 @ 9:46 PM (0/0)
- support for KDI rwhoward, November 3 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
- OUR CHILDREN NEED A SAFE GREENSPACE yosemitesierra, November 3 @ 6:28 PM (0/0)
- Nonconfrontational tool for parents to exercise discretion of child's use mystwoman, November 3 @ 1:45 PM (0/0)
- kids wat, November 3 @ 12:28 AM (1/1)
- Our kids need this ant, November 2 @ 11:54 PM (0/0)
- Support of .kids domain tyty, November 2 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
- Support of .kidds bubbles, November 2 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)
- Support of .kidds domainI Kiam, November 2 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)
- .kids by .Kids Domains, Inc is the BEST! Cindy, November 2 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
- .KIDS DOMAINS, INC. JoAnne , November 2 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
- Finally! I hope it works! sherig, November 2 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
- comment mo5360, November 2 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)
- Fully support concept lc, November 2 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)
- This plan is ready to work. readersvp, November 2 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)
- Why .kids is a GREAT idea! PATKATMC, November 2 @ 8:06 PM (0/0)
- IT'S NOT ABOUT RESTRICTION, IT'S ABOUT FREEDOM! kirkjayne, November 2 @ 5:05 AM (1/1)
- KDI's proposal Barbara, October 28 @ 4:30 PM (1/1)
- Excellent proposal Neo, October 27 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
- .kids tld - general observations john.carr, October 27 @ 9:05 AM (1/2)
- An Outstanding Idea e.t.m., October 26 @ 4:31 AM (0/0)
- It's about kids, and it's about time! rgiusta, October 24 @ 5:52 PM (1/1)
- KidSurf Online supports this Application kidsurf, October 23 @ 11:44 PM (1/2)
- Let's see how serious ICANN is about online safety for kids... MarkF, October 23 @ 7:22 PM (1/1)
- support for .kids domain napa, October 21 @ 7:32 PM (0/0)
- we Need It bigdaddy, October 20 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)
- This is the way to go... gmmiller, October 18 @ 6:20 PM (1/1)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:16 PM (2/2)
- Congratulations! DRM, October 18 @ 5:32 AM (1/1)
- No Way Mr. Howe momof2, October 16 @ 6:31 PM (2/2)
- Nice Seperation slassre, October 16 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)
- .Kids Domains proposal and a general comment on the .Kids TLD's hedeer, October 16 @ 1:07 AM (2/2)
- .KIDS TLD Application Should Be Denied - details inside... ron10000, October 14 @ 5:25 PM (3/3)
- Where are the kids in ".kids?" nicholasmoraitis, October 14 @ 11:52 AM (3/6)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy