I think we've got to go back to first principles if we look at TLD's.Firstly;
it is in my view inevitable that every person, and every corporate or business, will
have their own, unique, identifier, to be linked to the only online function which
requires identity. ie e-payment.
So we need dot id (say) for individuals and dot
co (say) for corporates/businesses.
Secondly, I believe that all non commercial
sites should continue to use the current TLD conventions.
The innovation I have
in mind, and hence my objection to Net Space's attempt to appropriate it, relates
to "dot market".
Like the internet, markets are not and can never be proprietary,
one of the underlying tenets of regulators/anti trust being to combat "market abuse";
"market manipulation" and so on from the Microsoft actions down.
My construct
is as follows.
Create public utility portals - eg cocoa.market or cocoa.mkt.
Create a user group of market participants linked by one common function - the ability
to enter into paperless contracts through whatever Exchange or ecn happened to operate
in the cocoa market.
Provide users with infrastructure such as market access via
a market specific network; market data; billing systems and software; market-specific
payment; a market-specific title registry and so on all provided by a neutral "market
service provider". The MSP would be a consortium with (say) a four year contract
after which further consortia could bid.
The cocoa market user group would constitute
a wholesale market regulator with global reach, able to keep out crooks, defaulters
and so on.
This model essentially takes markets away from proprietary interests
and empowers users generally.
Only a concept, but a powerful one which is seriously
interesting some very big players.
So no dot market please, Name Space, markets
belong to everyone not you.