Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
jtrade |
Date/Time: |
Sun, November 5, 2000 at 3:55 AM GMT |
Browser: |
AOL Browser V5.0 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
ICANN Bribery? |
Message: |
|
This is the Q & A for Commercial
connect who is also seeking .shop This is rather interesting. How dare ICANN ask
for their legal bills to be paid. I am a .shop registrant through name-space
and you bet I will assert my rights! I find this unethical and a form of bribery.
See you in court if need be. ICANN Questions:
ICANN is in the process of
reviewing Commercial Connect's TLD Application. As outlined in the October 23, 2000
TLD Application Review Update which appears at http://www.icann.org/tlds/tld-review-update-23oct00.htm,
ICANN may "gather the additional information [it] require[s] by posing specific questions
to applicants in e-mail and requesting a written response." Keeping in mind the
goal to evaluate applications to operate or sponsor new TLDs in as open and transparent
a manner as possible, both the questions posed by ICANN and the Applicant's responses
will be publicly disclosed on the ICANN website. Accordingly, ICANN requests your
reponses to the following questions: 1. Identify and summarize Applicant's assumptions
with respect to the existence of other general purpose TLDs in determining the total
number of registrations in your application. 2. State in detail your position
as it relates to possible legal claims by certain applicants and/or non-applicant
third parties based on alleged trademark, patent or other violations of purported
rights in the TLDs identified in your application. 3. If you receive a new TLD,
state whether you will indemnify ICANN for claims arising from legal challenges regarding
your right to operate the new TLD. If you will indemnify ICANN, identify and describe
in detail the resources you propose to utilize for the indemnification. 4. Hypothetically,
if you receive .shop as a new TLD instead of .mall, describe in detail the effect,
if any, on the pro forma financial statements submitted with your application. 5.
Hypothetically, if you receive .svc as a new TLD instead of .mall, describe in detail
the effect, if any, on the pro forma financial statements submitted with your application.
Commercial Connect Responses: 1.Please look at the attachment. 2. Commercial
Connect, LLC's application calls for a sunrise period for trademark and/or intellectual
property applicants to register domains. We shall require our registrars get information
pertaining to the applicant's right to such domain. This may be in the form of a
letter on company letterhead stating the name or strings that they have registered,
the country in which it is registered and proof of registration such as a trademark
number or certificate. Commercial Connect, LLC. will periodically screen the registrars
to insure this is being enforced. 3. In regards to legal claims by the applicants,
Commercial Connect, LLC. proposed to adopt the ICANN Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy
for handling such claims. We will in fact indemnify ICANN for claims arising from
legal challenges that may incur in regards to our right to operate such registry.
Simon Properties has a complete in house council as well and uses Jones, Day,
Reavis and Pogue among others for intellectual property matters. 4. and 5. Our
actuaries estimated that 92% of the business would be from the .shop TLD, another
7% would be from .svc and only 1% would be from .svc. By including .svc and .mall
our intent was to allow for organization of certain e-commerce segments to enhance
the usability of the internet. The .svc and .mall while important are more likely
to reflect organizational placeholders while the .shop would make the proposal financially
feasible. http://www.icann.org/tlds/mall1/qa.html
|
| |
Link: |
Q & A |
Message Thread:
- .ads, etc. Application by Name.Space, Incorporated Moderator, October 7 @ 10:39 PM (65/177)
- Support for Name.Space and IOD S. Hudgens, November 5 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)
- Final Word To ICANN: Name-Space & IOD Eliahu, November 5 @ 8:19 PM (1/1)
- Say YES! to IOD and Name Space first1, November 5 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
- I support .SHOP for Name.Space netizen1, November 5 @ 5:41 AM (0/0)
- I PROTEST AGAINST THAT FORUM SYSTEM jefsey, November 5 @ 4:01 AM (1/1)
- ICANN Bribery? jtrade, November 5 @ 3:55 AM (0/0)
- Domains already "registered" at Name.Space zgyeo, November 5 @ 2:47 AM (2/4)
- "Dirt in The Domain Name Game" jtrade, November 5 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)
- They are great prissyfit, November 4 @ 1:32 PM (0/0)
- Name Space Inc. Application The Walt Disney Company, November 3 @ 11:29 PM (2/7)
- Top Level Domains seanjason, November 3 @ 8:53 PM (0/0)
- Support for Name.Space and .shop S. Hudgens, November 3 @ 4:33 PM (0/0)
- Support Name Space daimonic, November 3 @ 8:03 AM (0/0)
- Do you know why NAME-SPACE'S .SHOP is best? webcafe, November 3 @ 1:47 AM (0/0)
- Support for Name.Space application URLMerchant, November 3 @ 1:47 AM (1/1)
- Let's hope the ICANN doesn't approve too many of these! ipguy, November 3 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
- .games tld mevans, November 2 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
- I DO NOT AGREE NAME.SPACE IS NOT BEST FOR .SHOP Talmage, November 2 @ 3:18 PM (0/0)
- I support Name-Space jtrade, November 1 @ 10:02 PM (2/3)
- Unexplored, Inc. Urges Acceptance of .Shop Registrations by Name-Space Unexplored, November 1 @ 9:43 PM (0/0)
- NAME-SPACE'S .SHOP IS NOT THE BEST .SHOP Talmage, November 1 @ 2:24 PM (1/1)
- Yes to .SHOP by NAME-SPACE ! arts Lee, November 1 @ 6:58 AM (0/0)
- VOTE to .SHOP by NAME-SPACE net, November 1 @ 6:45 AM (0/0)
- New Tld's and ICANN Conflict of Interest? jtrade, November 1 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)
- Yes to .ART by NameSpace cello, October 30 @ 6:45 AM (0/0)
- Yes to Name Space: common sense, democracy, free market Ivo, October 30 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)
- Preregistrations allowed with NSI!!!! C.Bell, October 30 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)
- Hurray for Name Space pdr, October 29 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)
- ICANN say yes to Namespace noisefactor, October 29 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
- yes to Name.Space fly, October 29 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)
- I support name.space patty, October 28 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
- NEED FOT MORE AND MORE TLD'S ajay, October 28 @ 8:49 AM (0/0)
- "Beware the ICANN Board Squatters" jtrade, October 27 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)
- Beware of capitalist-speak Melvin Q. Watchpocket, October 27 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)
- fails completely squish, October 26 @ 1:30 PM (2/6)
- TO ICANN board members, staff, and applicants (including NAMESPACE)......WHERE ARE YOU???? Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 4:22 AM (1/2)
- give pioneers a chance - vote for namespace and IOD - Interview about ICANN - president Ether Dyser ted, October 25 @ 11:21 PM (1/3)
- NameSpace peniel, October 25 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)
- Can I register .web now Anili, October 25 @ 2:15 PM (1/1)
- : ( World Thoughts, October 25 @ 8:26 AM (0/0)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web jtrade, October 25 @ 3:49 AM (2/4)
- Comments Perios Must be Extended Even Longer! jtrade, October 25 @ 3:29 AM (0/0)
- YES to .magic by Name.Space Igor, October 25 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)
- More Than One ChrisT, October 24 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)
- Vote Yes to Name.Space Joe Trip, October 24 @ 1:29 PM (0/0)
- Where's the Competition? jtrade, October 24 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)
- YES to .lab labdir, October 23 @ 2:38 PM (0/0)
- What needs our future internet - pioneers like namespace or IOD - or monopolies ? whats your mind ? ted, October 23 @ 6:39 AM (0/0)
- Name-space Application for dot shop !! grimnaru, October 23 @ 2:16 AM (4/17)
- Comments about ICANN New TLD process - Is anything being done about it? ALLDNS, October 22 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)
- Pioneer Preference cambler, October 22 @ 8:04 PM (4/22)
- newbie: Please help - domain chanceled Guaranie, October 22 @ 9:58 AM (0/0)
- Moderator - Consider placing General Comments at top of Forum ALLDNS, October 22 @ 3:22 AM (1/2)
- Where is due process and the standards in all of this? ALLDNS, October 22 @ 3:06 AM (1/1)
- Where are the rules? ALLDNS, October 22 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
- ***GENERAL COMMENTS AT BOTTOM OF FORUM***GENERAL COMMENTS AT BOTTOM OF FORUM*** Facilitator, October 22 @ 1:47 AM (1/1)
- .ads domains kh, October 21 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
- Namespace Application sjk, October 19 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:40 PM (1/1)
- Reservations about Name.Space Korskarn, October 15 @ 1:39 PM (1/1)
- Greed by Name.Space hoffy, October 14 @ 11:34 PM (3/6)
- TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot/IOD Supporters are getting organized...We are building a website!! Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)
- What is the Name.Space intent? marshm, October 14 @ 3:06 AM (1/1)
- Name-Space Application for .Shop and IODesign Application for .Web Attorney, October 14 @ 1:43 AM (5/12)
- Moderator: Please correct error in TLD description. Name.Space, October 14 @ 12:38 AM (2/14)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy