Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
  
    | Username: | y2k | 
  
    | Date/Time: | Wed, November 1, 2000 at 11:06 PM GMT | 
  
    | Browser: | Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 95 | 
  
    | Score: | 5 | 
  
    | Subject: | VOTE NO TO AFILIAS  //  VOTE YES TO IOD | 
  
    | Message:
 |  | 
  
    | 
 | 
 | It is imperative that you read
 this message in its entirety.
 
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 >
 >  It
is imperative and absolute that the decision
 > on which Top Level Domain names
and Companies
 > are going to soon be introduced to the Internet,
 > are based
on the merits of the company's
 > application, its performance, and overall
 >
choice/popularity (as noted on Icann's Public
 > Comment Forum); as opposed to
possible conflict
 > of interest as noted by other company's member's
 > affiliations.
 >
 >  As seen on the Public Comment Forum, the most
 > well received overall
choice as a New TLD is
 > Image Online Design's .WEB Registry (over 21,000
 >
supporters thus so far). Since .WEB is the only,
 > and sole, suffix requested
by Image Online Design,
 > it would be most fair and justified to grant them the
 >
.WEB Registry rights, while granting other company's
 > their rights to different
suffixes which they have
 > requested. For example, Afilias may be granted the
 >
registry for their requested .info and .site instead
 > of .WEB (if a need arises
to
 > grant them a TLD extension at all).
 >
 >   As you will
find, this is a can't loose win-win
 > situation. Image Online Design is the most
just,
 > fair, and absolute well received contender for the
 > .WEB extension.
 >
 >   Let's all remember ICANN's goal of opening
 > up the domain
name system and encouraging
 > competition for domain name usage, opposed to the
 >
monopolistic power some company's are trying to
 > have over the internet.
 >
 >
 >  * * Please read message in its entirety * *
 >
 >
 > 
               Why .WEB ?
 >
 >  
1. All inclusive (unlike .Mall, .Biz, .news, et)
 >   2. Non controversial
(Unlike .Sex,.XXX,.Aids, et)
 >   3. Most recognized and well known prefix
 >      (unlike .nom, .wap, .ypi, .svc, et)
 >   4.
Poses as a serious contender to the already
 >      depleted .com,
.net, .org suffixes
 >   5. .WEB registry has been in continuous operation
 >      since July 31, 1996
 >   6. .WEB already holds
a strong following and
 >      tremendous support all over the
world, from
 >      Internet and non-Internet users
 >  
7. Image Online Design's .WEB application meets
 >      all of
ICANN's criteria
 >   8. Over 20,000 registrants have approved of .WEB
 > 
    as their TLD selection
 >
 >     
      Why Image Online Design?
 >
 >   1. Currently
the longest standing prospective
 >      registry
 >  
2. Active in its domain debate since its
 >      inception 4 years
ago
 >   3. Continuous work to ensure that policies and
 >   
  procedures are created fairly
 >   4. Offers ongoing, effective,
DNS Services
 >   5. Has made significant upgrades to its technical
 > 
    infrastructure
 >   6. Already uses a progressive and
efficient
 >      Domain name system & Root server system
 >  
7. Has a proven track record of managing a
 >      technically
adaptable highly stable domain
 >      name registry
 >  
8. Has adopted ICANN's Uniform Domain Name
 >      Dispute Resolution
Policy
 >   9. Adheres to the Rules of using this policy
 >  
10. Maintains and sustains a completely secure
 >       website
for private transactions and
 >       individual collections
 >  
11. Incredible support of  .WEB customers, and
 >      
users of the Internet all over the world
 >   12. Supports and
adheres to ICANN's overriding
 >       goal of opening up
the domain name system
 >       and encouraging competition
for domain
 >       name usage (opposed to Network Solutions,
Inc.
 >       who controls 98% of all domain name
 > 
     registrations in the US, two-thirds of all
 >   
   domain registrations in the world, and seeks
 >      
to monopolize the domain name market).
 >   13. Does not undermine ICANN's
goal to select a
 >       diversity of proposals to become
TLD's
 >       (unlike NSI's Afilias that poses a
 > 
     transparent attempt to circumvent this
 >      
process).
 >   14. Has become one of the most sophisticated
 > 
     pioneer registries in the country
 >   15. Image
Online Design brings stability to the
 >       internet, meets
the diversity of proposal
 >       test, and is committed
to protecting
 >       intellectual property rights.
 > 
  16. Does not propose a conflict of interest, nor
 >     
  is it monopolistic in nature.
 >    17. Was previously given
permission to become
 >        the .WEB Registry by IANA years
ago.
 >
 >      Over 20,000 Supporters of Image Online Design
 >      And .WEB exist all over the Country, all over
 > 
    the World.
 >
 > Remember Image Online Design and .WEB.
 > Again,
thank you for your consideration.
 >
 >
 > Sir Walter Wales
 > Dr. Z.C.Wilson
 >
North American Region
 >
 
 
 
 | 
 | 
 | 
Message Thread:
  - .info, etc. Application by Afilias, LLC   Moderator, October 7 @ 10:21 PM (57/145)
    - Afilias must WAIT!   first1, November 5 @ 3:45 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness   fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:06 AM (0/0)
- .info to Afilias & .web to IODesign   H, November 3 @ 11:12 PM (1/1)
- VOTE YES to .WEB, YES to .SITE but NO to AFILIAS   Anthony 2nd, November 3 @ 8:52 PM (1/1)
- ......Regarding .WEB: Vote YES to Image Online Design // Vote NO to Afilias !   icann_, November 1 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)
- Regarding .WEB: Vote YES to Image Online Design // Vote NO to Afilias   y2k, November 1 @ 11:21 PM (0/0)
- ....Regarding .WEB: Vote NO to Afilias // Vote YES to Image Online Design !   y2k, November 1 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world!   fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)
- ZDNet picks up the Meeks Article   vdfman, October 26 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)
- Don't change the RRP right now   mikel5, October 26 @ 2:31 PM (0/0)
- Tell it like it is! Moderator?   first1, October 26 @ 12:09 AM (2/2)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web   jtrade, October 25 @ 3:54 AM (1/2)
- Read This About NSI, For Perspective On Afilias Application   pilot2, October 24 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
- Where's the Competition?   jtrade, October 24 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
- Why the moderator does not have a real name ??   debug, October 24 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)
- NSI Cybersquatting   jtrade, October 23 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)
- The last thing you want   Say_No_To_Afilias, October 23 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)
- Tucows and Register.com submit letter expressing concern over Agreements between ICANN/NSI   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 11:19 PM (1/2)
- SAY NO TO     .WEB   SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:44 PM (4/10)
- Doesn't anyone find it odd that. . .   World Thoughts, October 22 @ 2:47 PM (2/3)
- Afilias - open and fair   gpine, October 21 @ 8:17 AM (2/3)
- Sherman & Clayton Antitrust Acts & Afilias   Merlin, October 21 @ 3:54 AM (1/1)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community   Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:10 PM (1/2)
- .web concerns   David Coombs, October 17 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)
- Comments about Network Solutions....from another board (verifying what we are saying ICANN)   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)
- 500,000 Domains  Stolen By Trademark? Holders During Sunrise Period   enforcer, October 17 @ 8:35 AM (0/0)
- AFILIAS.TV!!!!!!  WHAT A GREAT IDEA!!!!!!!!  THIS IS SO ACCURATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:22 AM (0/0)
- SAY NO TO AFILIAS and YES TO IOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  IOD is the future of the internet!!!!!!!!   SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
- Image Online Design should get .web   martindali, October 16 @ 10:48 PM (1/2)
- Vote NO to Afilias   joanna lane, October 16 @ 10:30 PM (1/3)
- KEN STUBBS - CONFLICT OF INTEREST!   md, October 16 @ 10:10 PM (0/0)
- Fuzzy looking numbers   Ray, October 16 @ 4:36 AM (2/5)
- Afilias should have changed their name to>>>   Merlin, October 16 @ 12:58 AM (0/0)
- Toubling Aspects Of Afilias Application   Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 8:17 PM (1/2)
- Has the creation of  AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels?   friedrich, October 15 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)
- FORGET THIS EMOTIONAL RHETORIC -- LETS LOOK AT THE FACTS   TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:37 AM (3/3)
- Ken Stubs - Insider   TheWebster, October 15 @ 9:38 AM (0/0)
- THIS APPLICATION IS BAD FOR YOU,  AND THE INTERNET   Frank S., October 15 @ 1:56 AM (2/3)
- I support Afilias and registered Afilias.web today!   Stoertebeker, October 14 @ 9:09 PM (1/1)
- TO ICANN BOARD MEMBERS:  Dot WEB/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!!   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 7:02 PM (1/7)
- ICANN SCAMMED OUT OF ($950,000) BY AFILIAS CARTEL!   AdvantaTel, October 14 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)
- CORE   first1, October 14 @ 6:11 PM (1/1)
- KEN STUBS TESTIMONY   first1, October 14 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)
- More (illegal) Domain Name hoarding by NSI (=Afilias)?   Rebeka, October 14 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
- Can Afilias Really Execute???   TheWebster, October 14 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)
- WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this.   cgrady, October 14 @ 7:01 AM (3/4)
- Sunrise Period and Afilias is Bad News!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   Merlin, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/1)
- TO ICANN BOARD MEMBERS:   Afilia.net is a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing...   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 5:09 AM (0/0)
- TUCOWS has Sold Out!   Merlin, October 14 @ 4:51 AM (1/1)
- DOT WEB will be tied up in court and new bid process for years   dsigala, October 14 @ 3:47 AM (3/11)
- Ken Stubbs & Conflict of Interest Policy   RDM, October 14 @ 3:05 AM (3/6)
- TO The ICANN Board Members   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 13 @ 11:44 PM (1/1)
- Afilias, A New Cartel!   AdvantaTel, October 13 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
- Internet Stability?   Ray, October 13 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
- Afilias.TV - Is this their new web site??   spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:16 PM (2/2)
- Anti-Trust Concerns   Merlin, October 13 @ 8:02 PM (1/1)
- Ken Stubbs and the Conflict of Interest   Merlin, October 13 @ 7:42 PM (3/6)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy