Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
icann_ |
Date/Time: |
Wed, November 1, 2000 at 11:31 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 95 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
......Regarding .WEB: Vote YES to Image Online Design // Vote NO to Afilias ! |
Message: |
|
It is imperative that you read
this message in its entirety. > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * > > It is imperative and absolute that the decision > on
which Top Level Domain names and Companies > are going to soon be introduced to
the Internet, > are based on the merits of the company's > application, its
performance, and overall > choice/popularity (as noted on Icann's Public >
Comment Forum); as opposed to possible conflict > of interest as noted by other
company's member's > affiliations. > > As seen on the Public Comment
Forum, the most > well received overall choice as a New TLD is > Image Online
Design's .WEB Registry (over 21,000 > supporters thus so far). Since .WEB is the
only, > and sole, suffix requested by Image Online Design, > it would be most
fair and justified to grant them the > .WEB Registry rights, while granting other
company's > their rights to different suffixes which they have > requested.
For example, Afilias may be granted the > registry for their requested .info and
.site instead > of .WEB (if a need arises to > grant them a TLD extension
at all). > > As you will find, this is a can't loose win-win >
situation. Image Online Design is the most just, > fair, and absolute well received
contender for the > .WEB extension. > > Let's all remember
ICANN's goal of opening > up the domain name system and encouraging > competition
for domain name usage, opposed to the > monopolistic power some company's are
trying to > have over the internet. > > > * * Please read message
in its entirety * * > > >
Why .WEB ? > > 1. All inclusive (unlike .Mall, .Biz,
.news, et) > 2. Non controversial (Unlike .Sex,.XXX,.Aids, et) >
3. Most recognized and well known prefix > (unlike .nom,
.wap, .ypi, .svc, et) > 4. Poses as a serious contender to the already
> depleted .com, .net, .org suffixes > 5.
.WEB registry has been in continuous operation > since July
31, 1996 > 6. .WEB already holds a strong following and >
tremendous support all over the world, from >
Internet and non-Internet users > 7. Image Online Design's .WEB application
meets > all of ICANN's criteria > 8. Over
20,000 registrants have approved of .WEB > as their TLD selection >
> Why Image Online Design? >
> 1. Currently the longest standing prospective >
registry > 2. Active in its domain debate since its >
inception 4 years ago > 3. Continuous work to ensure
that policies and > procedures are created fairly >
4. Offers ongoing, effective, DNS Services > 5. Has made significant
upgrades to its technical > infrastructure >
6. Already uses a progressive and efficient > Domain name
system & Root server system > 7. Has a proven track record of managing
a > technically adaptable highly stable domain >
name registry > 8. Has adopted ICANN's Uniform Domain
Name > Dispute Resolution Policy > 9. Adheres
to the Rules of using this policy > 10. Maintains and sustains a completely
secure > website for private transactions and >
individual collections > 11. Incredible support
of .WEB customers, and > users of the Internet
all over the world > 12. Supports and adheres to ICANN's overriding
> goal of opening up the domain name system >
and encouraging competition for domain >
name usage (opposed to Network Solutions, Inc. > who
controls 98% of all domain name > registrations in
the US, two-thirds of all > domain registrations in
the world, and seeks > to monopolize the domain name
market). > 13. Does not undermine ICANN's goal to select a >
diversity of proposals to become TLD's >
(unlike NSI's Afilias that poses a > transparent attempt
to circumvent this > process). > 14.
Has become one of the most sophisticated > pioneer
registries in the country > 15. Image Online Design brings stability
to the > internet, meets the diversity of proposal
> test, and is committed to protecting >
intellectual property rights. > 16. Does not
propose a conflict of interest, nor > is it monopolistic
in nature. > 17. Was previously given permission to become >
the .WEB Registry by IANA years ago. > >
Over 20,000 Supporters of Image Online Design >
And .WEB exist all over the Country, all over > the World. >
> Remember Image Online Design and .WEB. > Again, thank you for your consideration.
> > > Sir Walter Wales > Dr. Z.C.Wilson > North American Region
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .info, etc. Application by Afilias, LLC Moderator, October 7 @ 10:21 PM (57/145)
- Afilias must WAIT! first1, November 5 @ 3:45 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:06 AM (0/0)
- .info to Afilias & .web to IODesign H, November 3 @ 11:12 PM (1/1)
- VOTE YES to .WEB, YES to .SITE but NO to AFILIAS Anthony 2nd, November 3 @ 8:52 PM (1/1)
- ......Regarding .WEB: Vote YES to Image Online Design // Vote NO to Afilias ! icann_, November 1 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)
- Regarding .WEB: Vote YES to Image Online Design // Vote NO to Afilias y2k, November 1 @ 11:21 PM (0/0)
- ....Regarding .WEB: Vote NO to Afilias // Vote YES to Image Online Design ! y2k, November 1 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world! fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)
- ZDNet picks up the Meeks Article vdfman, October 26 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)
- Don't change the RRP right now mikel5, October 26 @ 2:31 PM (0/0)
- Tell it like it is! Moderator? first1, October 26 @ 12:09 AM (2/2)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web jtrade, October 25 @ 3:54 AM (1/2)
- Read This About NSI, For Perspective On Afilias Application pilot2, October 24 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
- Where's the Competition? jtrade, October 24 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
- Why the moderator does not have a real name ?? debug, October 24 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)
- NSI Cybersquatting jtrade, October 23 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)
- The last thing you want Say_No_To_Afilias, October 23 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)
- Tucows and Register.com submit letter expressing concern over Agreements between ICANN/NSI Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 11:19 PM (1/2)
- SAY NO TO .WEB SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:44 PM (4/10)
- Doesn't anyone find it odd that. . . World Thoughts, October 22 @ 2:47 PM (2/3)
- Afilias - open and fair gpine, October 21 @ 8:17 AM (2/3)
- Sherman & Clayton Antitrust Acts & Afilias Merlin, October 21 @ 3:54 AM (1/1)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:10 PM (1/2)
- .web concerns David Coombs, October 17 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)
- Comments about Network Solutions....from another board (verifying what we are saying ICANN) Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)
- 500,000 Domains Stolen By Trademark? Holders During Sunrise Period enforcer, October 17 @ 8:35 AM (0/0)
- AFILIAS.TV!!!!!! WHAT A GREAT IDEA!!!!!!!! THIS IS SO ACCURATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:22 AM (0/0)
- SAY NO TO AFILIAS and YES TO IOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IOD is the future of the internet!!!!!!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
- Image Online Design should get .web martindali, October 16 @ 10:48 PM (1/2)
- Vote NO to Afilias joanna lane, October 16 @ 10:30 PM (1/3)
- KEN STUBBS - CONFLICT OF INTEREST! md, October 16 @ 10:10 PM (0/0)
- Fuzzy looking numbers Ray, October 16 @ 4:36 AM (2/5)
- Afilias should have changed their name to>>> Merlin, October 16 @ 12:58 AM (0/0)
- Toubling Aspects Of Afilias Application Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 8:17 PM (1/2)
- Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? friedrich, October 15 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)
- FORGET THIS EMOTIONAL RHETORIC -- LETS LOOK AT THE FACTS TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:37 AM (3/3)
- Ken Stubs - Insider TheWebster, October 15 @ 9:38 AM (0/0)
- THIS APPLICATION IS BAD FOR YOU, AND THE INTERNET Frank S., October 15 @ 1:56 AM (2/3)
- I support Afilias and registered Afilias.web today! Stoertebeker, October 14 @ 9:09 PM (1/1)
- TO ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot WEB/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!! Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 7:02 PM (1/7)
- ICANN SCAMMED OUT OF ($950,000) BY AFILIAS CARTEL! AdvantaTel, October 14 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)
- CORE first1, October 14 @ 6:11 PM (1/1)
- KEN STUBS TESTIMONY first1, October 14 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)
- More (illegal) Domain Name hoarding by NSI (=Afilias)? Rebeka, October 14 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
- Can Afilias Really Execute??? TheWebster, October 14 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)
- WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this. cgrady, October 14 @ 7:01 AM (3/4)
- Sunrise Period and Afilias is Bad News!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Merlin, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/1)
- TO ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Afilia.net is a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 5:09 AM (0/0)
- TUCOWS has Sold Out! Merlin, October 14 @ 4:51 AM (1/1)
- DOT WEB will be tied up in court and new bid process for years dsigala, October 14 @ 3:47 AM (3/11)
- Ken Stubbs & Conflict of Interest Policy RDM, October 14 @ 3:05 AM (3/6)
- TO The ICANN Board Members Gregory W. Krajewski, October 13 @ 11:44 PM (1/1)
- Afilias, A New Cartel! AdvantaTel, October 13 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
- Internet Stability? Ray, October 13 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
- Afilias.TV - Is this their new web site?? spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:16 PM (2/2)
- Anti-Trust Concerns Merlin, October 13 @ 8:02 PM (1/1)
- Ken Stubbs and the Conflict of Interest Merlin, October 13 @ 7:42 PM (3/6)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy