| |
 |
This
Comment Forum is now closed.
ICANN Public
Comment Forum
Working Group
C Report on gTLD Expansion
|
On 21 March 2000, Working Group C presented
a status report to the DNSO Names Council concerning its study
of gTLD expansion. This Public Comment Forum is dedicated to the
discussion of that report and the issues Working Group C has been
studying. The Names Council will discuss the report and public
comments on it at an 18 April 2000 telephone meeting and is scheduled
to provide a report to the ICANN Board by 20 April 2000.
Comments through Friday, 21 April
2000
- If gTLDs not recommended, here's should happen — GVRecieve, 12:34
AM (0/0)
- Ending
domain name speculation — meta,
3:31 PM (1/1)
- Two
modest proposals — meta,
3:16 PM (0/0)
- .com
is King - restricted TLD's are the future —
timbeckham,
1:58 PM (1/1)
- New
gTLDs - Good idea — tvlyon,
Tue 7:54 PM (0/0)
- We
need new gTLDs — Brendan,
Tue 3:16 PM (1/2)
- language
is — nativehue,
Tue 6:51 AM (0/0)
- Support
new gTLDs — huangk,
Tue 2:54 AM (0/0)
- what
are we trying to accomplish? — william,
Mon 4:18 PM (0/0)
- Comments
to Working Group C's Report — garvey,
Mon 2:02 PM (1/1)
- Would
new TLD's change anything? — Phibian,
Mon 5:07 AM (2/2)
- Open
TLD registration — bweinman,
Mon 1:14 AM (1/1)
- How
to spot speculators and cybersquatters in this forum — kodo,
Sun 11:43 PM (2/3)
- Why
our clients are against new TLD's —
jlandrum, Sun
8:46 AM (2/5)
- Proposed
gTLDs .REG and .TM — jmgraham,
Sun 7:17 AM (1/2)
- Vote
the Best Postings in the Discussion Group —
Layman, Sun 4:34
AM (0/0)
- .TM
and .REG for a new gTLD is a good idea, but has one MAJOR problem
— Domainator,
Sat 7:56 PM (1/4)
- New
gTLD's (STOP THE NONSENSE) — aquiles,
Sat 5:25 PM (1/1)
- .club?
— rxtreme7,
Sat 3:47 PM (1/1)
- Something's
very fishy with IOD and Name.Space... —
andrew, Sat 8:20
AM (4/4)
- We
don't need new gTLDs? Have you tried to register a dot
com name lately? — Domainator,
Sat 2:40 AM (1/1)
- Complete
solution to all major issues (sorry, but it takes 10 min. to
read it ...) — friedrich,
Sat 1:59 AM (2/8)
- CCDN
Comments on the Working Group C Report —
SJMetalitz,
Fri 6:34 PM (0/0)
- A
Simple Way to Resolve the Domain Issue —
layman, April 13
@ 9:25 PM (1/1)
- Pre-registration
mandate — lyrad,
April 13 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
- A
plea for objectivity — andrew,
April 13 @ 7:40 AM (1/1)
- Let
the registrations stand! — Domainator,
April 13 @ 12:36 AM (1/2)
- Is
This A Forum — Shak,
April 12 @ 9:05 PM (3/3)
- TLD
— horace,
April 12 @ 6:28 PM (0/0)
- Add
the gTLDs and Be Done With It! — Teri, April 12 @ 5:47
PM (2/6)
- Pre-Registration
— Lyrad,
April 12 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
- I
would like to sugest 2 new gTLD's —
David6, April 12
@ 5:14 PM (0/0)
- Add
New TLDs Now !!! — kodo,
April 12 @ 4:25 PM (1/2)
- Short
and sweet — scuzz,
April 12 @ 3:28 PM (1/1)
- ICAN's
fallacy on new TLD names — jbond,
April 12 @ 2:39 PM (0/0)
- Support
arbitrarily large number of new gTLDs —
sb, April 12 @ 10:22
AM (2/3)
- I
recommend .web, .sex, .shop, .info, .naa, .firm, .sucks, .kids,
.space, .arts — kodo,
Sat 10:30 PM (1/1)
- I
agree and recommends: .web .firm .shop .sex .asia —
BHK, April 13 @ 3:53
AM (0/0)
- .web,
registrar evaluation and pre-registration —
wrowe, April 12 @
4:58 AM (4/7)
- trademark
issues — friedrich,
April 11 @ 11:22 AM (1/1)
- Internet
belongs to the world — jmgraham,
April 11 @ 3:25 AM (3/4)
- I
wish my name was Frank. — Frank
S., April 11 @ 12:03 AM (5/5)
- in
the news... — stuart,
April 10 @ 4:16 PM (1/1)
- Against
the NGH (new-gtld-hysteria) — friedrich,
April 10 @ 2:10 PM (0/0)
- Ten
Is Not Enough — JimMoody,
April 10 @ 1:42 AM (1/1)
- New
TLD's are not needed — enforcer,
April 10 @ 12:25 AM (2/5)
- Strongly
opposed to new gTLD's — hlhoffman,
April 8 @ 2:08 AM (2/5)
- Indigenous
TLD — derrico,
April 7 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
- gTLDs
and Language — stuart,
April 7 @ 4:31 PM (1/2)
- ASAP
— Raj,
April 10 @ 6:55 AM (1/1)
- Add
.web .shop .art .info .firm NOW — dennismith, April
7 @ 4:53 AM (1/1)
- FORK
IN THE ROAD — frank
s., April 6 @ 6:40 PM (0/0)
- .web
again ... — friedrich,
April 6 @ 2:56 PM (1/1)
- One
possible solution — jmgraham,
April 6 @ 12:23 AM (5/6)
- The
case for a few new gTLDs has never been stronger —
andrew, April 5
@ 11:06 PM (1/1)
- Let's
Get Really Real! — Teri,
April 5 @ 9:36 PM (1/1)
- It's
Too Early To Add New Top Level Domains —
Joe, April 5 @ 9:49
AM (2/3)
- No
good .com domain names available anymore?? —
friedrich, April
5 @ 9:46 AM (2/14)
- How
about starting with 3 new gTLD's — Scott, April 5 @ 9:19
AM (1/1)
- .WEB
TLD — jmgraham,
April 5 @ 4:50 AM (4/7)
- I
support Position Paper E (author's test, otherwise ignore)
— brunner,
April 5 @ 2:03 AM (0/0)
- New
GTLDs are needed? Sounds like more Pandemonium... —
Frank S., April
4 @ 11:10 PM (0/0)
- Add
only one new gtld and see what happens! —
friedrich, April
4 @ 1:40 PM (3/4)
- How
about .abc or .123 new gTLDs? — Jack, April 4 @ 8:13
AM (0/0)
- Internet
desperately needs new gTLD's — tharrington,
April 4 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
- I
favor new gTLDs — DougLorenz,
April 4 @ 1:08 AM (1/1)
- Strongly
support 6-10 new Top Level Domains —
andrew, April 3
@ 11:20 PM (0/0)
- Strongly
opposed to new "generic" top level domains — rwatson,
April 3 @ 6:25 PM (1/1)
- Alternative
to gTLD Expansion ... — bdaviduck,
April 3 @ 4:40 PM (1/1)
- New
GTLD's are not painful — phil,
April 3 @ 4:34 PM (2/2)
- Strongly
opposed to new Top Level Domains — scatodoc, April 3
@ 3:02 PM (0/0)
- Against
new gTLDs — pdeblanc,
April 3 @ 12:42 AM (3/3)
- Few
if any new gTLDs should be introduced —
Mark, April 3 @ 9:45
AM (2/4)
- Against
gTLDs — dkgibson,
April 3 @ 8:22 AM (2/2)
- Vote
for gTLDs — kendall,
April 3 @ 7:07 AM (1/1)
- What
new gTLDs are concerned now? — Jack,
April 3 @ 5:39 AM (0/0)
0 Fresh + 0 New + 214 Old = 214 Total headers
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy