Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
cgrady |
Date/Time: |
Sat, October 14, 2000 at 1:05 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.75 using Windows NT |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
My Letter to ICANN |
Message: |
|
I thought I should post my initial letter to ICANN for
public record. ********************************** Ladies and Gentlemen of ICANN, I
am certain that this is a difficult and stressful time for you. I truly appreciate
your commitment to ICANN. Please accept my apologies in advance for adding to the
overflow of emails that you must already be receiving. However, I feel so strongly
about the upcoming review process that will take place that I felt the needed to
email you directly. I am taking this opportunity to voice my strongest endorsement
and support of Image Online, Inc., owner of www.webtld.com (the .WEB registry)
I believe this organization, granted permission by IANA several years ago to establish
the .WEB registry, has shown superior customer support and handling of .WEB registrations.
They have proven to me to have the capacity, know-how, and the existing stable
infrastructure to support the .WEB initiative. However, the strongest show of
support has been the more than 18,000+ names that have been registered and are currently
being managed in advance of final approval from ICANN. The open working relationship
between ICANN and entities that IANA granted permission to, for the establishment
and collection of proposed registry domain names, is of crucial importance to the
tempered expansion of the Internet and how it will be accessed, used, and accessible
in the future. I feel that my letter of support also represents the thousands
of people who are more than satisfied with the way in which Image Online has more
than competently managed this process. Several years ago I stumbled upon the .WEB
registry at www.webtld.com completely by accident. I read Image Online's statement
regarding the permission given to them by IANA to establish the .WEB registry and
to begin accepting and managing registrations. Before registering a .WEB domain I
called and emailed ICANN to verify that IANA had indeed given this permission. ICANN
verified that IANA had given permission to Image Online several years prior to my
request. To date 18,000+ .WEB domain names have been registered. Translated this
means: - Over 18,000+ times a person has risked their money based on IANA's
permission for Image Online to establish the .WEB tld - Over 18,000+ times persons
invested, and continue to invest on a daily basis, in a company (Image Online) because
they provided a stable and safe system to register and manage domains, provided phone
support, answered email, and resolved the few problems or issues one had immediately,
many times while you were still on the phone. - Over 18,000+ times and actual
person, and not heavily backed domain squatters registered their .WEB domains. -
Over 18,000+ times people backed this alternative to .com, .net, and .org for themselves
and their clients
We knew that there was risk involved. We also knew that any
one of us, whether we had purchased a .WEB domain or not would have selected Image
Online to manage the .WEB registry simply because they had proven their complete
and total competence at establishing and managing the .WEB tld by providing unmatched
services and support (as well as a stable registry). They had successfully established
a domain management system the way it should be ... something that Network
Solutions had not been able to do since the beginning and still has not accomplished
today. Having personally suffered through the tyranny of the Network Solutions
monopoly, an organization which I still jokingly refer to today (through my 1st amendment
right) as "The Poster Child for Abusive Monopolies", Image Online's .WEB registry,
though not live, has been a breath of fresh air (and all from a company that has
struggled for years with the delays resulting from IANA's re-organization into ICANN
and the subsequent re-alignment). While many organizations have submitted their
applications to establish top level domains, their proposals for applications are
somewhat irrelevant. The REAL and RELEVANT issues are: - that IANA did give permission
to Image Online to establish the .WEB tld many years ago. - that over 18,000+
times Image Online was elected by us, the users of the domain name system, every
time we paid our $35 registration for a .WEB domain name over the past several years. -
if Image Online was not every bit as qualified as I have mentioned above to manage
the already established .WEB tld registration system then they would have disappeared
a long time ago. - Image Online is still here, we still support them and it is
ICANN’s obligation to listen to us, the users of the Internet, the builders of the
Internet, the people at the mercy of the current domain name system and at the mercy
of ICANN's decisions. You must understand that the required $50,000 fee that accompanied
Image Onine’s application is not simply a fee that is backed by some large venture
capital firm. It was paid for by us, the users, in support of Image Online by our
18,000+ X $35 registration fees. It is the result of a free and open market ... the
way it should be. Please take this into consideration. On the Internet only the
organizations that provide a quality service, both physically and technically survive.
Organizations that fail to meet the end users standards quickly find that their customers
have gone elsewhere, often over night. This is the way it should be, WE the users
deciding what services we want and need and from what organizations. It is clear
that we have chosen, by sheer volume of existing registered domains, Image Online
to manage the .WEB registry. Image Online has more than demonstrated their capacity
to manage the .web registry and Internet users have more than begun to demonstrate
their interest in the .WEB domain as well as interacting with Image Online in support
of this process. Kind Regards, Chris Grady President & CEO Vieodata,
Inc. chris@vieodata.com
cc: Esther Dyson Jean Francois Abramatic Amadeu
Abril i Abril Robert Blokzijl Geraldine Capedeboscq Vinton G. Cerf Jonathan
Cohen George Conrades Greg Crew Philip Davidson Frank Fitzsimmons Ken
Fockler Hans Kraaijenbrink Sang Hyun Kyong Jun Murai Alejandro Pisanty Michael
Roberts Helmut Schink Eugenio Triana Linda S. Wilson Pindar Wong Andrew
McLaughlin Louis Touton
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .web Application by Image Online Design dba Web Registry Moderator, October 7 @ 9:53 PM (126/442)
- My final views on Image Online. cgrady, November 6 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
- IOD is a globally recogized stable registry Gregory W. Krajewski, November 5 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)
- In RegLand.com already 280 of the TOP 520 .web names are "preregistered". friedrich, November 5 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD first1, November 5 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)
- Very serious legal concerns regarding trademark law! friedrich, November 5 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
- DNSO warning against "pre-registrations" can't affect IOD, due to its unique and special history fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
- ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- IOD issues useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:54 AM (1/2)
- Pioneer Preference is best way netizen1, November 5 @ 5:54 AM (0/0)
- The TOP 520 .web names belong to 180 people friedrich, November 5 @ 3:17 AM (2/2)
- Another Positive Aspect Of The IOD Application dcorish, November 5 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
- "Dirt in The Domain Name Game" jtrade, November 5 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
- NO ! to IOD - NO to .web SayNoToIOD, November 4 @ 7:45 PM (6/7)
- You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:11 AM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD :) first1, November 4 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- Sir, you do have a right to post here, however not to distort the truth Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
- Still waiting for your answer to my comments. friedrich, November 4 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- You make no Sense Merlin, November 4 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- These allegations are, of course, false cambler, November 4 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)
- Letters in Support of IOD jtrade, November 4 @ 7:21 PM (1/1)
- Yes IOD no to Afilias/Neustar on .web pvos, November 4 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5 Saskia, November 4 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)
- IOD should run .WEB H, November 3 @ 11:09 PM (1/1)
- Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON) fabrcop, November 3 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5 saskia, November 3 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
- IOD has earned .WEB through hard work ar, November 3 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)
- Summing it all up.. netfxmedia, November 2 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
- Say Yes To IOD for the web TLD JaseK, November 2 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
- ICANNs silence with IOD must be a nod of approval jeffrey, November 2 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
- CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application! fabrcop, November 2 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
- What is the point of .web? james fryer, November 2 @ 12:41 AM (2/7)
- IOD and the Texas republic SayNoToIOD, November 2 @ 6:58 AM (4/5)
- Give Image Online Design .WEB // Give Afilias .INFO worldwide, November 2 @ 5:48 AM (0/0)
- Alert: Conflicts of Interest Addressed VikashPatel, November 2 @ 4:59 AM (1/1)
- IOD application for .web makes sense to me veronica, November 2 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)
- Moral rights fabrcop, November 1 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
- .............Why IOD? Over 20,025 Reasons Why y2k, October 30 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:13 PM (2/5)
- Ethics in Government: ICANN's Role in .web mbrittan, October 29 @ 10:57 PM (3/5)
- IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
- Desperation hitz, October 27 @ 6:50 PM (7/12)
- IOD's Application For .WEB Qualifies, At Very Least, For "Pioneer's Preference" Exemption pilot2, October 27 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)
- ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence) fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:30 PM (1/1)
- What Happens to the Pre-registrations if IOD doesn't get .Web? lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:33 AM (1/2)
- vote for IOD - see interview Dyson - our request trademark NSI ted, October 26 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- the jury will say no SayNoToIOD, October 25 @ 11:35 PM (3/3)
- The JV Team's wants to turn ".WEB" into ".bigbucks" TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
- who had the original idea? theboss, October 25 @ 7:37 PM (1/1)
- ICANN vs IOD Doc Again, October 25 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
- To: C.Ambler, IOD . IMPORTANT QUESTIONS. IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/7)
- I encourage everyone to read IOD's application - I would like to know what others are thinking!! I Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 5:56 AM (1/1)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web jtrade, October 25 @ 3:56 AM (3/8)
- Chris CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
- IOD, what does that stands for? anonymous, October 24 @ 5:56 AM (1/3)
- IOD and Ken Stubbs Merlin, October 24 @ 12:18 AM (4/4)
- Some arguments pro/contra IODs .web ... please read! friedrich, October 23 @ 7:08 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (short version) fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:26 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (long version) fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:21 PM (1/1)
- The success of new TLDs rests right here... Rob, October 23 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)
- IOD's willingness to field questions in this forum & Afilias' absence thereof Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:55 PM (1/5)
- MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY. PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!! Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:29 PM (2/14)
- .web is lousy proposal SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:43 PM (3/5)
- CLEAR the DATABASE then give em .web stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:26 PM (5/6)
- IOD - the ultimate CYBERSQUATTER - to be sold out GPine, October 21 @ 8:11 AM (3/6)
- Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:49 AM (2/2)
- When is the decision on .web going to be made? VikashPatel, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/1)
- ....................Why IOD? Over 20,017 Reasons why Y2K, October 20 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
- Let's Discuss the issues...IOD has an excellent plan..People in place..Give competition a chance!! Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 1:14 AM (1/1)
- Illusions global view, October 20 @ 12:27 AM (7/13)
- Cyber Squatting Bit, October 19 @ 4:46 AM (3/5)
- IOD: THE RIGHT _AND_ LOGICAL CHOICE dtan, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
- Support of application for .web gmack3, October 18 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
- TO ICANN BOARD Members: This will be the official string for comments relating to IOD's Application. Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:40 PM (2/11)
- The Marketing of the Dot Web TLD..... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)
- .web opinion Stef, October 17 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
- Give it to IOD petemillar, October 17 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- Owning Multiple Domain Names: A Shared Domain Service Business mbrittan, October 17 @ 9:05 AM (5/5)
- Dot Web Registry... rlangsford, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
- IOD is the best choice weblord, October 17 @ 6:33 AM (1/1)
- .WEB solo puede ser manejado por IODesign..... ciudad, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
- VOTE YES ON IOD'S APPLICATION FOR .WEB. A WINNING CHOICE FOR A DESERVING COMPANY. WAY TO GO IOD!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
- I support Image Online for .web.... pirani, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
- I Support Image Online's .web application. jayt, October 17 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
- Friend of a Competitive Internet. jtrade, October 17 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
- Internet Stability !? stuart, October 16 @ 11:53 PM (1/1)
- I support IOD's .web application. markh, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
- Playing fair British, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (5/11)
- tearoom, breakfest, harrods, picadilly, landlady, ... take your chance to register them! friedrich, October 27 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
- OK, Then Let's Recall All .COMs, NETs, ORGs, and .UK pilot, October 17 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
- ICANN knows BrianC, October 17 @ 5:52 AM (3/5)
- Squatted? For The People, October 17 @ 1:50 AM (1/1)
- The Beginnning For The People, October 17 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)
- Read the applications and you will see that IODesign is the best choice for .web fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #5 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:26 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #4 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:25 AM (3/3)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #3 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #2 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #1 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)
- TO ICANN: This will be our official pro Dot Web and IOD string.......PLEASE POST UNDERNEATH... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:47 PM (18/21)
- Support of IOD jweb, November 5 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
- Give .WEB to IODesign // .INFO to Afilias worldwide, November 2 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)
- In support of IOD and the .web appliation Anthony, October 23 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD jumper, October 18 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
- Manufacturer Supports .WEB pilot, October 17 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
- Don't Forget To Ask This Person For Support... AdvantaTel, October 17 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)
- A non .web registrant in support of IOD md, October 16 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
- I think that it is fair that IODesign runs the .web registry fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)
- Support IOD first1, October 16 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)
- IODesign is most deserving of .web .webSupporter, October 16 @ 1:05 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD, because... saskia, October 16 @ 11:25 AM (1/1)
- Break the NSI (DoC) monopoly! Rob, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
- IOD supporter enforcer, October 16 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
- I support IODs application for .web friedrich, October 15 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD treherne, October 15 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)
- I support .web and IOD, diversity and small business WORLDWIDE! Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
- .web network liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
- Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? friedrich, October 15 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
- Full support of IO Designs .web application friedrich, October 15 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
- IOD Application Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Interlecuctal property is protected doc, October 15 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)
- WHERE'S THE GLOBAL COMMITTMENT HERE ? TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:03 AM (3/5)
- THE REAL FACTS ABOUT IO DESIGN TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:22 AM (2/10)
- I am confident in ICANN's fairness, so .web=IOD fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- K.I.S.S. debbie, October 15 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)
- IODesign's .WEB Application SEZenith, October 15 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
- IOD .WEB BID - SUPPORT Frank S., October 15 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
- A Recommendation to Posters. But More Than That--A Call to ICANN For The People, October 15 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
- IOD Lawsuit against IANA jtrade, October 14 @ 11:48 PM (1/1)
- Cancel PRE-REGISTRATIONS AT .......IOD Webster, October 14 @ 11:01 PM (3/5)
- TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot Web/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!! Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:56 PM (2/3)
- IOD congratulations! A job well done! first1, October 14 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
- I'm Interested. Abaddon, October 14 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)
- URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest Infinity, October 14 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- Image Online Design's claim of Conflict of Interest for Ken Stubbs! jcowell, October 14 @ 5:09 PM (2/4)
- Online Design has worked hard from 1995... support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
- rules for .web tld jeffB, October 14 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
- Come on! Lets have a decent argument! anthony, October 14 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Vote of confidence in IOD and .web anthony, October 14 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
- WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this!! cgrady, October 14 @ 7:08 AM (2/2)
- My .web comments for ICANN BrianC, October 14 @ 7:04 AM (3/13)
- Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy RDM, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/2)
- Give IOD the .Web Registration Attorney, October 14 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
- IODESIGN'S .Web Registration Unexplored, Inc., October 14 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
- My Letter to ICANN cgrady, October 14 @ 1:05 AM (1/2)
- TO ALL ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Evidence why the DOT WEB domain and IOD get our VOTE!! Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 12:55 AM (1/2)
- MORE DISCUSSION http://www.icann.com/mbx/offtopic/ BxB, October 13 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)
- After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices saskia, October 13 @ 11:08 PM (1/1)
- It is fair that ICANN accepts .web registry by IODesign fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:26 PM (1/1)
- What's that Afilias.TV site about?? spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:20 PM (1/10)
- Previous Post about IOD and .Web Merlin, October 13 @ 7:52 PM (2/3)
- Ken Stubbs, Conflict of Interest? Merlin, October 13 @ 7:49 PM (3/6)
- Serious doubts JConnors, October 13 @ 7:01 PM (6/28)
- .Web is excellent, Image Online have to be the winner Carlos, October 13 @ 6:22 PM (2/13)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy