Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
cgrady |
| Date/Time: |
Sat, October 14, 2000 at 7:08 AM GMT |
| Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.75 using Windows NT |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this!! |
Message: |
|
|
I've have attempted to put together a short list of blurbs
to further my understanding of the current issues. Based on some web references,
a few of which are from Ken Stubbs himself (posted on the DNSO web site). Correct
me if I am wrong, and I certainly hope that I am: - IANA gave Image Online permission
to establish the .WEB registry in 1995
- IANAs role was handed over to ICANN
-
Network Solutions heavily funds ICANN?
- ICANN now funds IANA?
- ICANN has
held off adding Image Onlines Registry to the root directory
- CORE attempted
to take away the .WEB TLD from Image Online
- ICANN has asked for competitive
bids for .WEB and other TLDs
- Afilias was created ONE MONTH AGO to compete with
Image Online for the .WEB TLD
- Network Solutions is part of Afilias
- CORE
is part of Afilias
- Afilias has a person by the name of Ken Stubbs on it's board
of directors
- Ken Stubs is on the Board of Directors for CORE
- Ken Stubs
is on the Board of Directors for Afilias
- Ken Stubs is connected to ICANN through
DNSO
- Therefor Ken Stubbs is directly connected to the decision making process
for a competitive bid in which companies he is involved with are competing?
-
Afilias says that two companies called Tucows and Q9 will start a company called
RegCo to help Afilias with it's registry
- Afilias makes allusions to offering
IANA an equity role in RegCo if it is granted a TLD ( http://www.icann.org/tlds/info1/Appendix_I.htm
) (The same IANA who is funded by ICANN who is funded by Network Solutions who
is a member of Afilias which is also co-owned by CORE) (in the middle of all of
this is Ken Stubbs, DNSO, a supporting organisation of ICANN, onthe board of managers
of Afilias, current chairman of CORE, officer of iDomains?) Can someone please
verify these issues? Regards,
Chris Grady
President
Vieodata, Inc. References:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/aboutdnso.html
http://www.icann.org/general/coi-policy.htm
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc05/msg01056.html
http://www.law.tm/
http://www.icann.org/tlds/info1/Appendix_I.htm
|
|
|
Message Thread:
- .web Application by Image Online Design dba Web Registry — Moderator, October 7 @ 9:53 PM (126/442)
- My final views on Image Online. — cgrady, November 6 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
- IOD is a globally recogized stable registry — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 5 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)
- In RegLand.com already 280 of the TOP 520 .web names are "preregistered". — friedrich, November 5 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD — first1, November 5 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)
- Very serious legal concerns regarding trademark law! — friedrich, November 5 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
- DNSO warning against "pre-registrations" can't affect IOD, due to its unique and special history — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
- ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- IOD issues — useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:54 AM (1/2)
- Pioneer Preference is best way — netizen1, November 5 @ 5:54 AM (0/0)
- The TOP 520 .web names belong to 180 people — friedrich, November 5 @ 3:17 AM (2/2)
- Another Positive Aspect Of The IOD Application — dcorish, November 5 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
- "Dirt in The Domain Name Game" — jtrade, November 5 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
- NO ! to IOD - NO to .web — SayNoToIOD, November 4 @ 7:45 PM (6/7)
- You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:11 AM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD :) — first1, November 4 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- Sir, you do have a right to post here, however not to distort the truth — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
- Still waiting for your answer to my comments. — friedrich, November 4 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- You make no Sense — Merlin, November 4 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- These allegations are, of course, false — cambler, November 4 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)
- Letters in Support of IOD — jtrade, November 4 @ 7:21 PM (1/1)
- Yes IOD no to Afilias/Neustar on .web — pvos, November 4 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5 — Saskia, November 4 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)
- IOD should run .WEB — H, November 3 @ 11:09 PM (1/1)
- Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON) — fabrcop, November 3 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5 — saskia, November 3 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
- IOD has earned .WEB through hard work — ar, November 3 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)
- Summing it all up.. — netfxmedia, November 2 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
- Say Yes To IOD for the web TLD — JaseK, November 2 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
- ICANNs silence with IOD must be a nod of approval — jeffrey, November 2 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
- CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application! — fabrcop, November 2 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
- What is the point of .web? — james fryer, November 2 @ 12:41 AM (2/7)
- IOD and the Texas republic — SayNoToIOD, November 2 @ 6:58 AM (4/5)
- Give Image Online Design .WEB // Give Afilias .INFO — worldwide, November 2 @ 5:48 AM (0/0)
- Alert: Conflicts of Interest Addressed — VikashPatel, November 2 @ 4:59 AM (1/1)
- IOD application for .web makes sense to me — veronica, November 2 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)
- Moral rights — fabrcop, November 1 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
- .............Why IOD? Over 20,025 Reasons Why — y2k, October 30 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world — fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:13 PM (2/5)
- Ethics in Government: ICANN's Role in .web — mbrittan, October 29 @ 10:57 PM (3/5)
- IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion — S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
- Desperation — hitz, October 27 @ 6:50 PM (7/12)
- IOD's Application For .WEB Qualifies, At Very Least, For "Pioneer's Preference" Exemption — pilot2, October 27 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)
- ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence) — fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:30 PM (1/1)
- What Happens to the Pre-registrations if IOD doesn't get .Web? — lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:33 AM (1/2)
- vote for IOD - see interview Dyson - our request trademark NSI — ted, October 26 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- the jury will say no — SayNoToIOD, October 25 @ 11:35 PM (3/3)
- The JV Team's wants to turn ".WEB" into ".bigbucks" — TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
- who had the original idea? — theboss, October 25 @ 7:37 PM (1/1)
- ICANN vs IOD — Doc Again, October 25 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
- To: C.Ambler, IOD . IMPORTANT QUESTIONS. — IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/7)
- I encourage everyone to read IOD's application - I would like to know what others are thinking!! I — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 5:56 AM (1/1)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:56 AM (3/8)
- Chris — CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
- IOD, what does that stands for? — anonymous, October 24 @ 5:56 AM (1/3)
- IOD and Ken Stubbs — Merlin, October 24 @ 12:18 AM (4/4)
- Some arguments pro/contra IODs .web ... please read! — friedrich, October 23 @ 7:08 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (short version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:26 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (long version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:21 PM (1/1)
- The success of new TLDs rests right here... — Rob, October 23 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)
- IOD's willingness to field questions in this forum & Afilias' absence thereof — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:55 PM (1/5)
- MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY. PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!! — Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:29 PM (2/14)
- .web is lousy proposal — SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:43 PM (3/5)
- CLEAR the DATABASE then give em .web — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:26 PM (5/6)
- IOD - the ultimate CYBERSQUATTER - to be sold out — GPine, October 21 @ 8:11 AM (3/6)
- Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:49 AM (2/2)
- When is the decision on .web going to be made? — VikashPatel, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/1)
- ....................Why IOD? Over 20,017 Reasons why — Y2K, October 20 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
- Let's Discuss the issues...IOD has an excellent plan..People in place..Give competition a chance!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 1:14 AM (1/1)
- Illusions — global view, October 20 @ 12:27 AM (7/13)
- Cyber Squatting — Bit, October 19 @ 4:46 AM (3/5)
- IOD: THE RIGHT _AND_ LOGICAL CHOICE — dtan, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
- Support of application for .web — gmack3, October 18 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
- TO ICANN BOARD Members: This will be the official string for comments relating to IOD's Application. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:40 PM (2/11)
- The Marketing of the Dot Web TLD..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)
- .web opinion — Stef, October 17 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
- Give it to IOD — petemillar, October 17 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- Owning Multiple Domain Names: A Shared Domain Service Business — mbrittan, October 17 @ 9:05 AM (5/5)
- Dot Web Registry... — rlangsford, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
- IOD is the best choice — weblord, October 17 @ 6:33 AM (1/1)
- .WEB solo puede ser manejado por IODesign..... — ciudad, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
- VOTE YES ON IOD'S APPLICATION FOR .WEB. A WINNING CHOICE FOR A DESERVING COMPANY. WAY TO GO IOD!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
- I support Image Online for .web.... — pirani, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
- I Support Image Online's .web application. — jayt, October 17 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
- Friend of a Competitive Internet. — jtrade, October 17 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
- Internet Stability !? — stuart, October 16 @ 11:53 PM (1/1)
- I support IOD's .web application. — markh, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
- Playing fair — British, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (5/11)
- tearoom, breakfest, harrods, picadilly, landlady, ... take your chance to register them! — friedrich, October 27 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
- OK, Then Let's Recall All .COMs, NETs, ORGs, and .UK — pilot, October 17 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
- ICANN knows — BrianC, October 17 @ 5:52 AM (3/5)
- Squatted? — For The People, October 17 @ 1:50 AM (1/1)
- The Beginnning — For The People, October 17 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)
- Read the applications and you will see that IODesign is the best choice for .web — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #5 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:26 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #4 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:25 AM (3/3)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #3 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #2 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #1 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)
- TO ICANN: This will be our official pro Dot Web and IOD string.......PLEASE POST UNDERNEATH... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:47 PM (18/21)
- Support of IOD — jweb, November 5 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
- Give .WEB to IODesign // .INFO to Afilias — worldwide, November 2 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)
- In support of IOD and the .web appliation — Anthony, October 23 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD — jumper, October 18 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
- Manufacturer Supports .WEB — pilot, October 17 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
- Don't Forget To Ask This Person For Support... — AdvantaTel, October 17 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)
- A non .web registrant in support of IOD — md, October 16 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
- I think that it is fair that IODesign runs the .web registry — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)
- Support IOD — first1, October 16 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)
- IODesign is most deserving of .web — .webSupporter, October 16 @ 1:05 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD, because... — saskia, October 16 @ 11:25 AM (1/1)
- Break the NSI (DoC) monopoly! — Rob, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
- IOD supporter — enforcer, October 16 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
- I support IODs application for .web — friedrich, October 15 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD — treherne, October 15 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)
- I support .web and IOD, diversity and small business WORLDWIDE! — Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
- .web network — liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
- Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? — friedrich, October 15 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
- Full support of IO Designs .web application — friedrich, October 15 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
- IOD Application — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Interlecuctal property is protected — doc, October 15 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)
- WHERE'S THE GLOBAL COMMITTMENT HERE ? — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:03 AM (3/5)
- THE REAL FACTS ABOUT IO DESIGN — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:22 AM (2/10)
- I am confident in ICANN's fairness, so .web=IOD — fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- K.I.S.S. — debbie, October 15 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)
- IODesign's .WEB Application — SEZenith, October 15 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
- IOD .WEB BID - SUPPORT — Frank S., October 15 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
- A Recommendation to Posters. But More Than That--A Call to ICANN — For The People, October 15 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
- IOD Lawsuit against IANA — jtrade, October 14 @ 11:48 PM (1/1)
- Cancel PRE-REGISTRATIONS AT .......IOD — Webster, October 14 @ 11:01 PM (3/5)
- TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot Web/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:56 PM (2/3)
- IOD congratulations! A job well done! — first1, October 14 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
- I'm Interested. — Abaddon, October 14 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)
- URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest — Infinity, October 14 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- Image Online Design's claim of Conflict of Interest for Ken Stubbs! — jcowell, October 14 @ 5:09 PM (2/4)
- Online Design has worked hard from 1995... — support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
- rules for .web tld — jeffB, October 14 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
- Come on! Lets have a decent argument! — anthony, October 14 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Vote of confidence in IOD and .web — anthony, October 14 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
- WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this!! — cgrady, October 14 @ 7:08 AM (2/2)
- My .web comments for ICANN — BrianC, October 14 @ 7:04 AM (3/13)
- Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy — RDM, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/2)
- Give IOD the .Web Registration — Attorney, October 14 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
- IODESIGN'S .Web Registration — Unexplored, Inc., October 14 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
- My Letter to ICANN — cgrady, October 14 @ 1:05 AM (1/2)
- TO ALL ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Evidence why the DOT WEB domain and IOD get our VOTE!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 12:55 AM (1/2)
- MORE DISCUSSION http://www.icann.com/mbx/offtopic/ — BxB, October 13 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)
- After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices — saskia, October 13 @ 11:08 PM (1/1)
- It is fair that ICANN accepts .web registry by IODesign — fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:26 PM (1/1)
- What's that Afilias.TV site about?? — spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:20 PM (1/10)
- Previous Post about IOD and .Web — Merlin, October 13 @ 7:52 PM (2/3)
- Ken Stubbs, Conflict of Interest? — Merlin, October 13 @ 7:49 PM (3/6)
- Serious doubts — JConnors, October 13 @ 7:01 PM (6/28)
- .Web is excellent, Image Online have to be the winner — Carlos, October 13 @ 6:22 PM (2/13)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy