Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
  
    | Username: | fabrcop | 
  
    | Date/Time: | Wed, October 25, 2000 at 2:07 PM GMT | 
  
    | Browser: | Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 95 | 
  
    | Score: | 5 | 
  
    | Subject: | Very interesting and important articole! | 
  
    | Message:
 |  | 
  
    | 
 | 
 | I did not like the critical attitude against ICANN in the article and I believe
that ICANN will make a fair choice.
 However, this article is very interesting
and important and
 clearly shows IOD's rights and merits about .web!
 Please read
the excerpt below, that is very interesting!!!Fabrizio Coppola
 Italy
 Excerpt:SHOOTOUT
AT THE .WEB CORRAL
 I suppose the real test of whether ICANN has the
 political
will to “do the right thing” will come with its
 decision over who gets to run
the .web domain, which
 surveys show is the most desired new domain.
 Small
catch: .web already belongs to Image Online
 Design.
 Image Online Design has
been running an alternative
 domain name registry using .web since 1996; that registry
 has
attracted about 20,000 paying .web domain name
 holders.
 ICANN has refused
to recognize Image Online
 Design’s efforts when in fact it could specifically
 set
aside .web under a “pioneer’s preference”
 exemption, much like the Federal Communications
 Commission
has done when handing out slices of
 the airwaves to companies that have
 pioneered
particular technologies.
 Now Image Online Design finds
 itself fighting for
what is clearly its own
 intellectual property. One of those bidding against it
is —
 big shocker — the Afilias group.
 Image Online Design CEO John Frangie
said the Afilias
 bid for .web is led by the “world’s greatest monopolistic
 force:
NSI.” Frangie then goes on to say that Network
 Solutions has “put together a cartel
of 19 companies to
 capture even more market share,” noting that the Afilias
 proposal
is a “cynical attempt to enhance the entrenched
 monopoly of NSI” and thereby “perverting
the very process
 that ICANN established to increase competition.”
 I couldn’t
have said it better.
 
 MONEY TALKS
 And just finish
off this murky tale, the other bidder for
 .web is listed as NeuStar, which as
it turns out is really
 “JVTeam,” a “new company formed by NeuStar and
 Melbourne
IT,” its application says. The latter of those two
 is a member of CORE and thus
also a member of Afilias.
 Smell a trend here?
 Wallow through this JVTeam bid
for .web long enough
 and you come across this statement:
 “JVTeam is prepared
to meet with ICANN and
 discuss any legal issue relating to a .web registry. If
 necessary,
JVTeam will indemnify ICANN for legal
 expenses incurred by ICANN resulting from
any legal
 challenges brought regarding a grant of the .web registry to
 JVTeam.”
 I’m
sure they didn’t mean to try and bribe ICANN, but
 it sure sounds like the old
comedy sketch where a conniving
 driver, pulled over for speeding, hands the cop
his license
 wrapped in a $50 bill.
 ICANN will deliver its decision on new domain
names
 in November. The group can redeem itself, if ever so
 slightly, by outright
dismissing all proposals from established
 players in the domain name space.
 
 
 
 
 | 
 | 
 | 
  
    | Link: | The full article | 
Message Thread:
  - .web Application by Image Online Design dba Web Registry   Moderator, October 7 @ 9:53 PM (126/442)
    - My final views on Image Online.   cgrady, November 6 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
- IOD is a globally recogized stable registry   Gregory W. Krajewski, November 5 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)
- In RegLand.com already 280 of the TOP 520 .web names are "preregistered".   friedrich, November 5 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD   first1, November 5 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)
- Very serious legal concerns regarding trademark law!   friedrich, November 5 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
- DNSO warning against "pre-registrations" can't affect IOD, due to its unique and special history   fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
- ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness   fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- IOD issues   useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:54 AM (1/2)
- Pioneer Preference is best way   netizen1, November 5 @ 5:54 AM (0/0)
- The TOP 520 .web names belong to 180 people   friedrich, November 5 @ 3:17 AM (2/2)
- Another Positive Aspect Of The IOD Application   dcorish, November 5 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
- "Dirt in The Domain Name Game"   jtrade, November 5 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
- NO !  to IOD  -  NO to .web   SayNoToIOD, November 4 @ 7:45 PM (6/7)
      - You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements   fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:11 AM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD :)   first1, November 4 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- Sir, you do have a right to post here, however not to distort the truth   Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
- Still waiting for your answer to my comments.   friedrich, November 4 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- You make no Sense   Merlin, November 4 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- These allegations are, of course, false   cambler, November 4 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)
- Letters in Support of IOD   jtrade, November 4 @ 7:21 PM (1/1)
- Yes IOD no to Afilias/Neustar on .web   pvos, November 4 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5   Saskia, November 4 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)
- IOD should run .WEB   H, November 3 @ 11:09 PM (1/1)
- Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON)   fabrcop, November 3 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5   saskia, November 3 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
- IOD has earned .WEB through hard work   ar, November 3 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)
- Summing it all up..   netfxmedia, November 2 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
- Say Yes To IOD for the web TLD   JaseK, November 2 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
- ICANNs silence with IOD must be a nod of approval   jeffrey, November 2 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
- CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application!   fabrcop, November 2 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
- What is the point of .web?   james fryer, November 2 @ 12:41 AM (2/7)
- IOD and the Texas republic   SayNoToIOD, November 2 @ 6:58 AM (4/5)
- Give Image Online Design .WEB // Give Afilias .INFO   worldwide, November 2 @ 5:48 AM (0/0)
- Alert:  Conflicts of Interest Addressed   VikashPatel, November 2 @ 4:59 AM (1/1)
- IOD application for .web makes sense to me   veronica, November 2 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)
- Moral rights   fabrcop, November 1 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
- .............Why  IOD? Over 20,025 Reasons Why   y2k, October 30 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world   fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:13 PM (2/5)
- Ethics in Government: ICANN's Role in .web   mbrittan, October 29 @ 10:57 PM (3/5)
- IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion   S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
- Desperation   hitz, October 27 @ 6:50 PM (7/12)
- IOD's Application For .WEB Qualifies, At Very Least, For "Pioneer's Preference" Exemption   pilot2, October 27 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)
- ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence)   fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:30 PM (1/1)
- What Happens to the Pre-registrations if IOD doesn't get .Web?   lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:33 AM (1/2)
- vote for IOD - see interview Dyson - our request trademark NSI   ted, October 26 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- the jury will say no   SayNoToIOD, October 25 @ 11:35 PM (3/3)
- The JV Team's wants to turn ".WEB" into ".bigbucks"   TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
- who had the original idea?   theboss, October 25 @ 7:37 PM (1/1)
- ICANN vs IOD   Doc Again, October 25 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
- To: C.Ambler, IOD . IMPORTANT QUESTIONS.   IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/7)
- I encourage everyone to read IOD's application - I would like to know what others are thinking!! I   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 5:56 AM (1/1)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web   jtrade, October 25 @ 3:56 AM (3/8)
- Chris   CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
- IOD, what does that stands for?   anonymous, October 24 @ 5:56 AM (1/3)
- IOD and Ken Stubbs   Merlin, October 24 @ 12:18 AM (4/4)
- Some arguments pro/contra IODs .web ... please read!   friedrich, October 23 @ 7:08 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (short version)   fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:26 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (long version)   fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:21 PM (1/1)
- The success of new TLDs rests right here...   Rob, October 23 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)
- IOD's willingness to field questions in this forum & Afilias' absence thereof   Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:55 PM (1/5)
- MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY.  PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!!   Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:29 PM (2/14)
- .web is lousy proposal   SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:43 PM (3/5)
- CLEAR the DATABASE then give em .web   stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:26 PM (5/6)
- IOD - the ultimate CYBERSQUATTER - to be sold out   GPine, October 21 @ 8:11 AM (3/6)
- Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries   SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:49 AM (2/2)
- When is the decision on .web going to be made?   VikashPatel, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/1)
- ....................Why IOD?  Over 20,017 Reasons why   Y2K, October 20 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
- Let's Discuss the issues...IOD has an excellent plan..People in place..Give competition a chance!!   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 1:14 AM (1/1)
- Illusions   global view, October 20 @ 12:27 AM (7/13)
- Cyber Squatting   Bit, October 19 @ 4:46 AM (3/5)
- IOD: THE RIGHT _AND_ LOGICAL CHOICE   dtan, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community   Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
- Support of application for .web   gmack3, October 18 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
- TO ICANN BOARD Members: This will be the official string for comments relating to IOD's Application.   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:40 PM (2/11)
- The Marketing of the Dot Web TLD.....   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)
- .web opinion   Stef, October 17 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
- Give it to IOD   petemillar, October 17 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- Owning Multiple Domain Names: A Shared Domain Service Business   mbrittan, October 17 @ 9:05 AM (5/5)
- Dot Web Registry...   rlangsford, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
- IOD is the best choice   weblord, October 17 @ 6:33 AM (1/1)
- .WEB solo puede ser manejado por IODesign.....   ciudad, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
- VOTE YES ON IOD'S APPLICATION FOR .WEB.  A WINNING CHOICE FOR A DESERVING COMPANY.  WAY TO GO IOD!!!   SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
- I support Image Online for .web....   pirani, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
- I Support Image Online's .web application.   jayt, October 17 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
- Friend of a Competitive Internet.   jtrade, October 17 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
- Internet  Stability  !?   stuart, October 16 @ 11:53 PM (1/1)
- I support IOD's .web application.   markh, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
- Playing fair   British, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (5/11)
      - tearoom, breakfest, harrods, picadilly, landlady, ... take your chance to register them!   friedrich, October 27 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
- OK, Then Let's Recall All .COMs, NETs, ORGs, and .UK   pilot, October 17 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
- ICANN knows   BrianC, October 17 @ 5:52 AM (3/5)
- Squatted?   For The People, October 17 @ 1:50 AM (1/1)
- The Beginnning   For The People, October 17 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)
- Read the applications and you will see that IODesign is the best choice for .web   fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #5   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:26 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #4   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:25 AM (3/3)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #3   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #2   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #1   IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)
- TO ICANN:  This will be our official pro Dot Web and IOD string.......PLEASE POST UNDERNEATH...   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:47 PM (18/21)
      - Support of IOD   jweb, November 5 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
- Give .WEB to IODesign // .INFO to Afilias   worldwide, November 2 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)
- In support of IOD and the .web appliation   Anthony, October 23 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD   jumper, October 18 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
- Manufacturer Supports .WEB   pilot, October 17 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
- Don't Forget To Ask This Person For Support...   AdvantaTel, October 17 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)
- A non .web registrant in support of IOD   md, October 16 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
- I think that it is fair that IODesign runs the .web registry   fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)
- Support IOD   first1, October 16 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)
- IODesign is most deserving of .web   .webSupporter, October 16 @ 1:05 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD, because...   saskia, October 16 @ 11:25 AM (1/1)
- Break the NSI (DoC) monopoly!   Rob, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
- IOD supporter   enforcer, October 16 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
- I support IODs application for .web   friedrich, October 15 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD   treherne, October 15 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)
- I support .web and IOD, diversity and small business WORLDWIDE!   Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
- .web network   liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
- Has the creation of  AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels?   friedrich, October 15 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
- Full support of IO Designs .web application   friedrich, October 15 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
- IOD Application   Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Interlecuctal property is protected   doc, October 15 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)
- WHERE'S THE GLOBAL COMMITTMENT HERE ?   TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:03 AM (3/5)
- THE REAL FACTS ABOUT IO DESIGN   TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:22 AM (2/10)
- I am confident in ICANN's fairness, so .web=IOD   fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- K.I.S.S.   debbie, October 15 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)
- IODesign's .WEB Application   SEZenith, October 15 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
- IOD .WEB BID  -  SUPPORT   Frank S., October 15 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
- A Recommendation to Posters. But More Than That--A Call to ICANN   For The People, October 15 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
- IOD Lawsuit against IANA   jtrade, October 14 @ 11:48 PM (1/1)
- Cancel PRE-REGISTRATIONS AT .......IOD   Webster, October 14 @ 11:01 PM (3/5)
- TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS:  Dot Web/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!!   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:56 PM (2/3)
- IOD congratulations! A job well done!   first1, October 14 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
- I'm Interested.   Abaddon, October 14 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)
- URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest   Infinity, October 14 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- Image Online Design's claim of Conflict of Interest for Ken Stubbs!   jcowell, October 14 @ 5:09 PM (2/4)
- Online Design has worked hard from 1995...   support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
- rules for .web tld   jeffB, October 14 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
- Come on! Lets have a decent argument!   anthony, October 14 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Vote of confidence in IOD and .web   anthony, October 14 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
- WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this!!   cgrady, October 14 @ 7:08 AM (2/2)
- My .web comments for ICANN   BrianC, October 14 @ 7:04 AM (3/13)
- Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy   RDM, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/2)
- Give IOD the .Web Registration   Attorney, October 14 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
- IODESIGN'S .Web Registration   Unexplored, Inc., October 14 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
- My Letter to ICANN   cgrady, October 14 @ 1:05 AM (1/2)
- TO ALL ICANN BOARD MEMBERS:   Evidence why the DOT WEB domain and IOD get our VOTE!!   Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 12:55 AM (1/2)
- MORE DISCUSSION     http://www.icann.com/mbx/offtopic/   BxB, October 13 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)
- After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices   saskia, October 13 @ 11:08 PM (1/1)
- It is fair that ICANN accepts .web registry by IODesign   fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:26 PM (1/1)
- What's that Afilias.TV site about??   spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:20 PM (1/10)
- Previous Post about IOD and .Web   Merlin, October 13 @ 7:52 PM (2/3)
- Ken Stubbs, Conflict of Interest?   Merlin, October 13 @ 7:49 PM (3/6)
- Serious doubts   JConnors, October 13 @ 7:01 PM (6/28)
- .Web is excellent, Image Online have to be the winner   Carlos, October 13 @ 6:22 PM (2/13)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy