Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
RDM |
Date/Time: |
Sat, October 14, 2000 at 5:12 AM GMT |
Browser: |
AOL Browser V5.0 using Windows 98 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy |
Message: |
|
Many of you have commented that the DNSO Bylaws fail to address conflicts of interest
due to Section (k) (of the DNSO Bylaws) which reads as follows: “[Reserved for
conflicts of interest policy, if necessary.]]” (Please see DNSO Bylaws at http://www.dnso.org/dnso/aboutdnso.html)
You
might be surprised to learn that the ICANN-established Conflicts of Interest Policy
may apply to Ken Stubbs as well as the other NC members. This line of reasoning
is supported by the articles on the DNSO Registrar Constituency at http://www.dnso.org/constituency/registrars/Registrars.Articles.html
. If you drill down to Section VI, Registrar Constituency Processes, you will
see the following language: VI Registrar Constituency Processes. 1. The Registrar
Constituency shall adhere to the open and transparent process requirements as stated
by ICANN. It shall also comply with ICANN-established conflict-of-interest, dispute
resolution and review policies, According to Section III, Organisation and
Structure, Ken Stubbs may be a Registrar Constituency Member. This section
reads as follows:
III Organisation and Structure 1. The Registrar Constituency
shall consist of: a. A Membership, as defined in the previous section b.
A Secretariat, with the functions described below. c. Three Names Council Representatives.
One of these representatives shall chair the Registrar Constituency meetings, which
can be either collocated or electronically linked. If so, isn’t Ken Stubbs required
to adhere to the ICANN-established Conflicts of Interest Policy (“COIP”)? You
can view the COIP as http://www.icann.org/general/coi-policy.htm . Provided
at the bottom of this message are various sections of the COIP that may be of interest. Please
note that we should all be asking a very important question - Have the various
functions required under the COIP been carried out by the individuals in charge?
Is ICANN willing to provide the public with a formal statement that all of the requirements
under the COIP have been adhered to (before the selection process is completed)?
Is ICANN willing to allow an independent auditor access to statements and other documents
that should have been generated per the requirements of the COIP (for review and
assurance purposes)? Also, please keep in mind that Ken Stubbs is not the only
potential Registrar Constituency Member. Remember to read the COIP, along with
the other pertinent documents, carefully and make your own conclusion. I have
already put these issues before Esther Dyson, however, I have yet to receive a response.
I make no claims as to these findings. This e-mail is for informational purposes
only. Selected Sections of the COIP for Your Review 1. Purpose
The purpose
of the Conflicts of Interest policy is to ensure that the deliberations and decisions
of the Corporation are made in the interests of the global Internet community as
a whole, and to protect the interests of the Corporation when it is contemplating
entering into a transaction, contract, or arrangement that might benefit the private
interest of an Interested Director, Officer or Person (as defined below). An Interested
Director, Officer or Person may not use his or her position with respect to the Corporation,
or confidential corporate information obtained by him or her relating to the Corporation,
in order to achieve a financial benefit for himself or herself or for a third person,
including another nonprofit or charitable organization. This policy is intended to
supplement but not replace any applicable laws governing conflicts of interest in
nonprofit and charitable corporations. 2.4 Interested Director. "Interested Director"
shall mean any Director of the Corporation who has a material financial interest,
as defined above, or who serves as a Director or Officer of any entity with which
the Corporation has a transaction, contract, or other arrangement. 2.5 Interested
Officer. "Interested Officer" shall mean any Officer who has a material financial
interest, as defined above, or who serves as a Director or Officer of any entity
with which the Corporation has a transaction, contract, or other arrangement. For
purposes of this policy, the President of the Corporation shall be treated as an
Officer. 2.6 Interested Person. "Interested Person" shall mean either: (a)
Any person currently being compensated by the Corporation for services rendered to
it within the previous 12 months, whether as a full- or part-time employee, independent
contractor, or otherwise, or (b) Any person whose family member, as defined in
Section 2.2, is currently being compensated by the Corporation for services rendered
to it within the previous 12 months, whether as a full- or part-time employee, independent
contractor, or otherwise. 3. Committee on Conflicts of Interest 3.1 To administer
and monitor compliance with this Policy, the Board shall create a Committee of the
Board on Conflicts of Interest ("Conflicts Committee"), to consist of at least two
Directors named by the Board. 3.2 The Conflicts Committee shall require a statement
from each Director and Officer not less frequently than once a year setting forth
all business and other affiliations which relate in any way to the business and other
activities of the Corporation. 5. Disclosure by Directors and Officers 5.1 When
requested by the Conflicts Committee (not less frequently than once a year), each
Director and Officer shall promptly submit a statement to the Committee setting forth
all business and other affiliations which relate in any way to the business and other
affiliations of the Corporation. 5.2 With respect to any particular matter then
pending before the Corporation, each Director and Officer shall disclose to the Conflicts
Committee any matter that could reasonably be considered to make the Director or
Officer an "Interested Director" or "Interested Officer," as defined above. 5.3
With respect to any particular matter then pending before the Corporation, each Director
and Officer shall disclose to the Conflicts Committee any relationship or other factor
that could reasonably be considered to cause the Director or Officer to be considered
to be an "Interested Person," as defined above. 5.4 For purposes of this section,
Officers of the Corporation need not disclose compensation and other benefits paid
to the Officer by the Corporation pursuant to Board resolution. 6. Disclosure
by Supporting Organization Members of or participants in Supporting Organization
councils must disclose conflicts of interest or other financial interests in matters
within the scope of the Supporting Organization in the manner required by the Bylaws
of the Supporting Organization. 7. Procedures in Connection with Proposed Transactions
and Arrangements 7.1 Scope. This section applies to any proposed transaction, contract,
or arrangement in which a Director, Officer, or Interested Person has a material
financial interest. 7.2 Duty to Disclose. In connection with any actual or possible
conflicts of interest, an Interested Director or Interested Officer must disclose
the existence and nature of his of her material financial interest to the Conflicts
Committee prior to the consideration of the proposed transaction, contract, or arrangement
by the Board or any Committee of the Board. 7.3 Determining Whether a Conflict
of Interest Exists. After disclosure of the financial interest, the disinterested
members of the Conflicts Committee shall determine whether a conflict of interest
exists. Neither the Board nor any Committee of the Board shall vote upon any proposed
transaction, contract, or arrangement in connection with which an actual or possible
conflict of interest has been disclosed by an Interested Director until such time
as the Conflicts Committee has addressed the actual or possible conflict of interest.
For matters pending before the full Board of Directors, a referral to the Conflicts
Committee will not be required where the Interested Director fully discloses to the
Board his or her financial interest and abstains from participation in the Board's
consideration of the proposed transaction, contract, or arrangement. 7.4 Procedures
for Addressing a Conflict of Interest 7.4.1 Where a matter has been referred to
the Conflicts Committee and the Conflicts Committee has concluded that a conflict
of interest exists, the chairman of the Board or Committee of the Board shall, if
appropriate, appoint a disinterested person or committee to investigate alternatives
to the proposed transaction, contract, or arrangement. 7.4.2 After exercising
due diligence, the Board or Committee shall determine whether the Corporation can
obtain a more advantageous transaction, contract, or arrangement with reasonable
efforts from a person or entity that would not give rise to a conflict of interest.
7.4.3 If a more advantageous transaction, contract, or other arrangement is not
reasonably attainable under circumstances that would not give rise to a conflict
of interest, the Board or Committee shall determine by a majority vote of the disinterested
Directors whether the transaction, contract, or arrangement is in the Corporation's
best interest and for its own benefit and whether it is fair and reasonable to the
Corporation, and shall make its decision as to whether to enter into the transaction,
contract, or arrangement in conformity with such determination. 8. Violations of
the Conflicts of Interest Policy 8.1 If the Conflicts Committee has reasonable
cause to believe that a Director or Officer has failed to disclose an actual or possible
conflict of interest, it shall inform the Director or Officer of the basis for such
belief and afford the Director or Officer an opportunity to explain the alleged failure
to disclose. 8.2 If, after hearing the response of the Director or Officer and
making such further investigation as may be warranted in the circumstances, the Conflicts
Committee determines that the member has in fact failed to disclose an actual or
possible conflict of interest, it shall recommend to the Board of Directors appropriate
disciplinary and corrective action. 8.3 The violation of this conflicts of interest
policy is a serious matter and may constitute "cause" for removal or termination
of a Director or Officer, or the termination of any contractual relationship the
Corporation may have with an Interested Person or other party. 9. Records of Proceedings 9.1
The minutes of the Conflicts Committee shall contain: (a) The names of Directors
and Officers found to have a material financial interest in connection with an actual
or possible conflict of interest; the nature of the financial interest; any action
taken to determine whether a conflict of interest was present; and the decision of
the Conflicts Committee as to whether a conflict of interest in fact existed. (b)
The names of the persons who were present for discussions and votes relating to the
actual or potential conflict of interest; the content of the discussion; and a record
of any votes taken in connection therewith. 9.2 In connection with a conflict
of interest, the minutes of the Board or other Committee of the Board shall contain
the names of the persons who were present for discussions and votes relating to the
transaction or arrangement; the content of the discussion, including any alternatives
to the proposed transaction or arrangement; and a record of any votes taken in connection
therewith. 10. Compensation Committees A member of any Committee of the Board
the jurisdiction of which includes compensation matters and who receives compensation
from the Corporation for services is precluded from voting on matters pertaining
to that member's compensation. 11. Annual Statements Each Director and Officer
shall annually sign a statement which affirms that such person: (a) Has received
a copy of the conflicts of interest policy; (b) Has read and understands the
policy; (c) Has agreed to comply with the policy; and (d) Understands that
the Corporation is a charitable organization and that in order to maintain its federal
tax exemption it must engage primarily in activities which accomplish one or more
of its tax-exempt purposes. 12. Periodic Reviews The Conflicts Committee shall
periodically consider whether and how this Conflicts of Interest Policy should be
revised or amended to better meet its objectives. In connection with any periodic
review conducted by the Corporation to ensure that it operates in a manner consistent
with its charitable purposes, the Conflicts Committee shall report on the matters
referred to it and their resolution.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .web Application by Image Online Design dba Web Registry Moderator, October 7 @ 9:53 PM (126/442)
- My final views on Image Online. cgrady, November 6 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
- IOD is a globally recogized stable registry Gregory W. Krajewski, November 5 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)
- In RegLand.com already 280 of the TOP 520 .web names are "preregistered". friedrich, November 5 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD first1, November 5 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)
- Very serious legal concerns regarding trademark law! friedrich, November 5 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
- DNSO warning against "pre-registrations" can't affect IOD, due to its unique and special history fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
- ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- IOD issues useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:54 AM (1/2)
- Pioneer Preference is best way netizen1, November 5 @ 5:54 AM (0/0)
- The TOP 520 .web names belong to 180 people friedrich, November 5 @ 3:17 AM (2/2)
- Another Positive Aspect Of The IOD Application dcorish, November 5 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
- "Dirt in The Domain Name Game" jtrade, November 5 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
- NO ! to IOD - NO to .web SayNoToIOD, November 4 @ 7:45 PM (6/7)
- You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:11 AM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD :) first1, November 4 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- Sir, you do have a right to post here, however not to distort the truth Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
- Still waiting for your answer to my comments. friedrich, November 4 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- You make no Sense Merlin, November 4 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- These allegations are, of course, false cambler, November 4 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)
- Letters in Support of IOD jtrade, November 4 @ 7:21 PM (1/1)
- Yes IOD no to Afilias/Neustar on .web pvos, November 4 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5 Saskia, November 4 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)
- IOD should run .WEB H, November 3 @ 11:09 PM (1/1)
- Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON) fabrcop, November 3 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5 saskia, November 3 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
- IOD has earned .WEB through hard work ar, November 3 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)
- Summing it all up.. netfxmedia, November 2 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
- Say Yes To IOD for the web TLD JaseK, November 2 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
- ICANNs silence with IOD must be a nod of approval jeffrey, November 2 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
- CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application! fabrcop, November 2 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
- What is the point of .web? james fryer, November 2 @ 12:41 AM (2/7)
- IOD and the Texas republic SayNoToIOD, November 2 @ 6:58 AM (4/5)
- Give Image Online Design .WEB // Give Afilias .INFO worldwide, November 2 @ 5:48 AM (0/0)
- Alert: Conflicts of Interest Addressed VikashPatel, November 2 @ 4:59 AM (1/1)
- IOD application for .web makes sense to me veronica, November 2 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)
- Moral rights fabrcop, November 1 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
- .............Why IOD? Over 20,025 Reasons Why y2k, October 30 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:13 PM (2/5)
- Ethics in Government: ICANN's Role in .web mbrittan, October 29 @ 10:57 PM (3/5)
- IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
- Desperation hitz, October 27 @ 6:50 PM (7/12)
- IOD's Application For .WEB Qualifies, At Very Least, For "Pioneer's Preference" Exemption pilot2, October 27 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)
- ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence) fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:30 PM (1/1)
- What Happens to the Pre-registrations if IOD doesn't get .Web? lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:33 AM (1/2)
- vote for IOD - see interview Dyson - our request trademark NSI ted, October 26 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- the jury will say no SayNoToIOD, October 25 @ 11:35 PM (3/3)
- The JV Team's wants to turn ".WEB" into ".bigbucks" TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
- who had the original idea? theboss, October 25 @ 7:37 PM (1/1)
- ICANN vs IOD Doc Again, October 25 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
- To: C.Ambler, IOD . IMPORTANT QUESTIONS. IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/7)
- I encourage everyone to read IOD's application - I would like to know what others are thinking!! I Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 5:56 AM (1/1)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web jtrade, October 25 @ 3:56 AM (3/8)
- Chris CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
- IOD, what does that stands for? anonymous, October 24 @ 5:56 AM (1/3)
- IOD and Ken Stubbs Merlin, October 24 @ 12:18 AM (4/4)
- Some arguments pro/contra IODs .web ... please read! friedrich, October 23 @ 7:08 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (short version) fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:26 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (long version) fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:21 PM (1/1)
- The success of new TLDs rests right here... Rob, October 23 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)
- IOD's willingness to field questions in this forum & Afilias' absence thereof Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:55 PM (1/5)
- MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY. PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!! Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:29 PM (2/14)
- .web is lousy proposal SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:43 PM (3/5)
- CLEAR the DATABASE then give em .web stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:26 PM (5/6)
- IOD - the ultimate CYBERSQUATTER - to be sold out GPine, October 21 @ 8:11 AM (3/6)
- Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:49 AM (2/2)
- When is the decision on .web going to be made? VikashPatel, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/1)
- ....................Why IOD? Over 20,017 Reasons why Y2K, October 20 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
- Let's Discuss the issues...IOD has an excellent plan..People in place..Give competition a chance!! Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 1:14 AM (1/1)
- Illusions global view, October 20 @ 12:27 AM (7/13)
- Cyber Squatting Bit, October 19 @ 4:46 AM (3/5)
- IOD: THE RIGHT _AND_ LOGICAL CHOICE dtan, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
- Support of application for .web gmack3, October 18 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
- TO ICANN BOARD Members: This will be the official string for comments relating to IOD's Application. Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:40 PM (2/11)
- The Marketing of the Dot Web TLD..... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)
- .web opinion Stef, October 17 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
- Give it to IOD petemillar, October 17 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- Owning Multiple Domain Names: A Shared Domain Service Business mbrittan, October 17 @ 9:05 AM (5/5)
- Dot Web Registry... rlangsford, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
- IOD is the best choice weblord, October 17 @ 6:33 AM (1/1)
- .WEB solo puede ser manejado por IODesign..... ciudad, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
- VOTE YES ON IOD'S APPLICATION FOR .WEB. A WINNING CHOICE FOR A DESERVING COMPANY. WAY TO GO IOD!!! SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
- I support Image Online for .web.... pirani, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
- I Support Image Online's .web application. jayt, October 17 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
- Friend of a Competitive Internet. jtrade, October 17 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
- Internet Stability !? stuart, October 16 @ 11:53 PM (1/1)
- I support IOD's .web application. markh, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
- Playing fair British, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (5/11)
- tearoom, breakfest, harrods, picadilly, landlady, ... take your chance to register them! friedrich, October 27 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
- OK, Then Let's Recall All .COMs, NETs, ORGs, and .UK pilot, October 17 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
- ICANN knows BrianC, October 17 @ 5:52 AM (3/5)
- Squatted? For The People, October 17 @ 1:50 AM (1/1)
- The Beginnning For The People, October 17 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)
- Read the applications and you will see that IODesign is the best choice for .web fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #5 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:26 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #4 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:25 AM (3/3)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #3 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #2 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #1 IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)
- TO ICANN: This will be our official pro Dot Web and IOD string.......PLEASE POST UNDERNEATH... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:47 PM (18/21)
- Support of IOD jweb, November 5 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
- Give .WEB to IODesign // .INFO to Afilias worldwide, November 2 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)
- In support of IOD and the .web appliation Anthony, October 23 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD jumper, October 18 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
- Manufacturer Supports .WEB pilot, October 17 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
- Don't Forget To Ask This Person For Support... AdvantaTel, October 17 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)
- A non .web registrant in support of IOD md, October 16 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
- I think that it is fair that IODesign runs the .web registry fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)
- Support IOD first1, October 16 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)
- IODesign is most deserving of .web .webSupporter, October 16 @ 1:05 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD, because... saskia, October 16 @ 11:25 AM (1/1)
- Break the NSI (DoC) monopoly! Rob, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
- IOD supporter enforcer, October 16 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
- I support IODs application for .web friedrich, October 15 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD treherne, October 15 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)
- I support .web and IOD, diversity and small business WORLDWIDE! Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
- .web network liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
- Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? friedrich, October 15 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
- Full support of IO Designs .web application friedrich, October 15 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
- IOD Application Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Interlecuctal property is protected doc, October 15 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)
- WHERE'S THE GLOBAL COMMITTMENT HERE ? TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:03 AM (3/5)
- THE REAL FACTS ABOUT IO DESIGN TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:22 AM (2/10)
- I am confident in ICANN's fairness, so .web=IOD fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- K.I.S.S. debbie, October 15 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)
- IODesign's .WEB Application SEZenith, October 15 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
- IOD .WEB BID - SUPPORT Frank S., October 15 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
- A Recommendation to Posters. But More Than That--A Call to ICANN For The People, October 15 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
- IOD Lawsuit against IANA jtrade, October 14 @ 11:48 PM (1/1)
- Cancel PRE-REGISTRATIONS AT .......IOD Webster, October 14 @ 11:01 PM (3/5)
- TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot Web/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!! Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:56 PM (2/3)
- IOD congratulations! A job well done! first1, October 14 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
- I'm Interested. Abaddon, October 14 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)
- URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest Infinity, October 14 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- Image Online Design's claim of Conflict of Interest for Ken Stubbs! jcowell, October 14 @ 5:09 PM (2/4)
- Online Design has worked hard from 1995... support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
- rules for .web tld jeffB, October 14 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
- Come on! Lets have a decent argument! anthony, October 14 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Vote of confidence in IOD and .web anthony, October 14 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
- WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this!! cgrady, October 14 @ 7:08 AM (2/2)
- My .web comments for ICANN BrianC, October 14 @ 7:04 AM (3/13)
- Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy RDM, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/2)
- Give IOD the .Web Registration Attorney, October 14 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
- IODESIGN'S .Web Registration Unexplored, Inc., October 14 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
- My Letter to ICANN cgrady, October 14 @ 1:05 AM (1/2)
- TO ALL ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Evidence why the DOT WEB domain and IOD get our VOTE!! Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 12:55 AM (1/2)
- MORE DISCUSSION http://www.icann.com/mbx/offtopic/ BxB, October 13 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)
- After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices saskia, October 13 @ 11:08 PM (1/1)
- It is fair that ICANN accepts .web registry by IODesign fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:26 PM (1/1)
- What's that Afilias.TV site about?? spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:20 PM (1/10)
- Previous Post about IOD and .Web Merlin, October 13 @ 7:52 PM (2/3)
- Ken Stubbs, Conflict of Interest? Merlin, October 13 @ 7:49 PM (3/6)
- Serious doubts JConnors, October 13 @ 7:01 PM (6/28)
- .Web is excellent, Image Online have to be the winner Carlos, October 13 @ 6:22 PM (2/13)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy