Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
Gregory W. Krajewski |
| Date/Time: |
Sat, October 14, 2000 at 3:52 AM GMT |
| Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98 |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
Another Reason to Vote for DOT WEB AND IOD: They WILL protect Trademarked names |
Message: |
|
Here is a link from a press release as to how they will
protect Trademarked names...
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/000929/ca_image_o.htmlAlso
from their application...as to how they will fairly implement a plan to protect trademarked
names: http://www.webtld.com/application/application/e1-e32.htm#e15 (6th paragraph
down from "Sunrise" heading I think what they have come up with will be revolutionary
(you just have to read the link)...What this represents is "innovation in registrations"..which
can only come through visionaries like IOD...I know this sounds one-sided but in
the name-space you need many heads thinking as to how to come up with the best "widget"...not
a few...Just keep that in mine...Again, thank you for letting me post.. Greg Krajewski
http://mywebcompany.tripod.com
gkrajews@mato.com
|
|
|
Message Thread:
- .web Application by Image Online Design dba Web Registry — Moderator, October 7 @ 9:53 PM (126/442)
- My final views on Image Online. — cgrady, November 6 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
- IOD is a globally recogized stable registry — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 5 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)
- In RegLand.com already 280 of the TOP 520 .web names are "preregistered". — friedrich, November 5 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD — first1, November 5 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)
- Very serious legal concerns regarding trademark law! — friedrich, November 5 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
- DNSO warning against "pre-registrations" can't affect IOD, due to its unique and special history — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
- ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- IOD issues — useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:54 AM (1/2)
- Pioneer Preference is best way — netizen1, November 5 @ 5:54 AM (0/0)
- The TOP 520 .web names belong to 180 people — friedrich, November 5 @ 3:17 AM (2/2)
- Another Positive Aspect Of The IOD Application — dcorish, November 5 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
- "Dirt in The Domain Name Game" — jtrade, November 5 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
- NO ! to IOD - NO to .web — SayNoToIOD, November 4 @ 7:45 PM (6/7)
- You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:11 AM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD :) — first1, November 4 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- Sir, you do have a right to post here, however not to distort the truth — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
- Still waiting for your answer to my comments. — friedrich, November 4 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
- You make no Sense — Merlin, November 4 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
- These allegations are, of course, false — cambler, November 4 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)
- Letters in Support of IOD — jtrade, November 4 @ 7:21 PM (1/1)
- Yes IOD no to Afilias/Neustar on .web — pvos, November 4 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5 — Saskia, November 4 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)
- IOD should run .WEB — H, November 3 @ 11:09 PM (1/1)
- Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON) — fabrcop, November 3 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5 — saskia, November 3 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
- IOD has earned .WEB through hard work — ar, November 3 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)
- Summing it all up.. — netfxmedia, November 2 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
- Say Yes To IOD for the web TLD — JaseK, November 2 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
- ICANNs silence with IOD must be a nod of approval — jeffrey, November 2 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
- CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application! — fabrcop, November 2 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
- What is the point of .web? — james fryer, November 2 @ 12:41 AM (2/7)
- IOD and the Texas republic — SayNoToIOD, November 2 @ 6:58 AM (4/5)
- Give Image Online Design .WEB // Give Afilias .INFO — worldwide, November 2 @ 5:48 AM (0/0)
- Alert: Conflicts of Interest Addressed — VikashPatel, November 2 @ 4:59 AM (1/1)
- IOD application for .web makes sense to me — veronica, November 2 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)
- Moral rights — fabrcop, November 1 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
- .............Why IOD? Over 20,025 Reasons Why — y2k, October 30 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world — fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:13 PM (2/5)
- Ethics in Government: ICANN's Role in .web — mbrittan, October 29 @ 10:57 PM (3/5)
- IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion — S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
- Desperation — hitz, October 27 @ 6:50 PM (7/12)
- IOD's Application For .WEB Qualifies, At Very Least, For "Pioneer's Preference" Exemption — pilot2, October 27 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)
- ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence) — fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:30 PM (1/1)
- What Happens to the Pre-registrations if IOD doesn't get .Web? — lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:33 AM (1/2)
- vote for IOD - see interview Dyson - our request trademark NSI — ted, October 26 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
- the jury will say no — SayNoToIOD, October 25 @ 11:35 PM (3/3)
- The JV Team's wants to turn ".WEB" into ".bigbucks" — TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
- who had the original idea? — theboss, October 25 @ 7:37 PM (1/1)
- ICANN vs IOD — Doc Again, October 25 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
- To: C.Ambler, IOD . IMPORTANT QUESTIONS. — IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/7)
- I encourage everyone to read IOD's application - I would like to know what others are thinking!! I — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 5:56 AM (1/1)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:56 AM (3/8)
- Chris — CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
- IOD, what does that stands for? — anonymous, October 24 @ 5:56 AM (1/3)
- IOD and Ken Stubbs — Merlin, October 24 @ 12:18 AM (4/4)
- Some arguments pro/contra IODs .web ... please read! — friedrich, October 23 @ 7:08 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (short version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:26 PM (1/1)
- The truth about .web (long version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:21 PM (1/1)
- The success of new TLDs rests right here... — Rob, October 23 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)
- IOD's willingness to field questions in this forum & Afilias' absence thereof — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:55 PM (1/5)
- MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY. PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!! — Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:29 PM (2/14)
- .web is lousy proposal — SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:43 PM (3/5)
- CLEAR the DATABASE then give em .web — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:26 PM (5/6)
- IOD - the ultimate CYBERSQUATTER - to be sold out — GPine, October 21 @ 8:11 AM (3/6)
- Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:49 AM (2/2)
- When is the decision on .web going to be made? — VikashPatel, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/1)
- ....................Why IOD? Over 20,017 Reasons why — Y2K, October 20 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
- Let's Discuss the issues...IOD has an excellent plan..People in place..Give competition a chance!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 1:14 AM (1/1)
- Illusions — global view, October 20 @ 12:27 AM (7/13)
- Cyber Squatting — Bit, October 19 @ 4:46 AM (3/5)
- IOD: THE RIGHT _AND_ LOGICAL CHOICE — dtan, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
- Support of application for .web — gmack3, October 18 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
- TO ICANN BOARD Members: This will be the official string for comments relating to IOD's Application. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:40 PM (2/11)
- The Marketing of the Dot Web TLD..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)
- .web opinion — Stef, October 17 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
- Give it to IOD — petemillar, October 17 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
- Owning Multiple Domain Names: A Shared Domain Service Business — mbrittan, October 17 @ 9:05 AM (5/5)
- Dot Web Registry... — rlangsford, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
- IOD is the best choice — weblord, October 17 @ 6:33 AM (1/1)
- .WEB solo puede ser manejado por IODesign..... — ciudad, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
- VOTE YES ON IOD'S APPLICATION FOR .WEB. A WINNING CHOICE FOR A DESERVING COMPANY. WAY TO GO IOD!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
- I support Image Online for .web.... — pirani, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
- I Support Image Online's .web application. — jayt, October 17 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
- Friend of a Competitive Internet. — jtrade, October 17 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
- Internet Stability !? — stuart, October 16 @ 11:53 PM (1/1)
- I support IOD's .web application. — markh, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
- Playing fair — British, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (5/11)
- tearoom, breakfest, harrods, picadilly, landlady, ... take your chance to register them! — friedrich, October 27 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
- OK, Then Let's Recall All .COMs, NETs, ORGs, and .UK — pilot, October 17 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
- ICANN knows — BrianC, October 17 @ 5:52 AM (3/5)
- Squatted? — For The People, October 17 @ 1:50 AM (1/1)
- The Beginnning — For The People, October 17 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)
- Read the applications and you will see that IODesign is the best choice for .web — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #5 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:26 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #4 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:25 AM (3/3)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #3 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #2 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (1/1)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #1 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)
- TO ICANN: This will be our official pro Dot Web and IOD string.......PLEASE POST UNDERNEATH... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:47 PM (18/21)
- Support of IOD — jweb, November 5 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
- Give .WEB to IODesign // .INFO to Afilias — worldwide, November 2 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)
- In support of IOD and the .web appliation — Anthony, October 23 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD — jumper, October 18 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
- Manufacturer Supports .WEB — pilot, October 17 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
- Don't Forget To Ask This Person For Support... — AdvantaTel, October 17 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)
- A non .web registrant in support of IOD — md, October 16 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
- I think that it is fair that IODesign runs the .web registry — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)
- Support IOD — first1, October 16 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)
- IODesign is most deserving of .web — .webSupporter, October 16 @ 1:05 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD, because... — saskia, October 16 @ 11:25 AM (1/1)
- Break the NSI (DoC) monopoly! — Rob, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
- IOD supporter — enforcer, October 16 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
- I support IODs application for .web — friedrich, October 15 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
- I support .web and IOD — treherne, October 15 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)
- I support .web and IOD, diversity and small business WORLDWIDE! — Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
- I Support Dot Web and IOD — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
- .web network — liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
- Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? — friedrich, October 15 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
- Full support of IO Designs .web application — friedrich, October 15 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
- IOD Application — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Interlecuctal property is protected — doc, October 15 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)
- WHERE'S THE GLOBAL COMMITTMENT HERE ? — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:03 AM (3/5)
- THE REAL FACTS ABOUT IO DESIGN — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:22 AM (2/10)
- I am confident in ICANN's fairness, so .web=IOD — fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
- K.I.S.S. — debbie, October 15 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)
- IODesign's .WEB Application — SEZenith, October 15 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
- IOD .WEB BID - SUPPORT — Frank S., October 15 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
- A Recommendation to Posters. But More Than That--A Call to ICANN — For The People, October 15 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
- IOD Lawsuit against IANA — jtrade, October 14 @ 11:48 PM (1/1)
- Cancel PRE-REGISTRATIONS AT .......IOD — Webster, October 14 @ 11:01 PM (3/5)
- TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot Web/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:56 PM (2/3)
- IOD congratulations! A job well done! — first1, October 14 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
- I'm Interested. — Abaddon, October 14 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)
- URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest — Infinity, October 14 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- Image Online Design's claim of Conflict of Interest for Ken Stubbs! — jcowell, October 14 @ 5:09 PM (2/4)
- Online Design has worked hard from 1995... — support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
- rules for .web tld — jeffB, October 14 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
- Come on! Lets have a decent argument! — anthony, October 14 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
- Vote of confidence in IOD and .web — anthony, October 14 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
- WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this!! — cgrady, October 14 @ 7:08 AM (2/2)
- My .web comments for ICANN — BrianC, October 14 @ 7:04 AM (3/13)
- Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy — RDM, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/2)
- Give IOD the .Web Registration — Attorney, October 14 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
- IODESIGN'S .Web Registration — Unexplored, Inc., October 14 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
- My Letter to ICANN — cgrady, October 14 @ 1:05 AM (1/2)
- TO ALL ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Evidence why the DOT WEB domain and IOD get our VOTE!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 12:55 AM (1/2)
- Another Reason to Vote for DOT WEB AND IOD: They WILL protect Trademarked names — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 3:52 AM (1/1)
- MORE DISCUSSION http://www.icann.com/mbx/offtopic/ — BxB, October 13 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)
- After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices — saskia, October 13 @ 11:08 PM (1/1)
- It is fair that ICANN accepts .web registry by IODesign — fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:26 PM (1/1)
- What's that Afilias.TV site about?? — spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:20 PM (1/10)
- Previous Post about IOD and .Web — Merlin, October 13 @ 7:52 PM (2/3)
- Ken Stubbs, Conflict of Interest? — Merlin, October 13 @ 7:49 PM (3/6)
- Serious doubts — JConnors, October 13 @ 7:01 PM (6/28)
- .Web is excellent, Image Online have to be the winner — Carlos, October 13 @ 6:22 PM (2/13)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy