IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion

Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: S. Hudgens

Date/Time: Sat, October 28, 2000 at 2:05 PM GMT

Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98

Score: 5

Subject: IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion

Message:

I think many of us would benefit from knowing exactly what a "pioneer's preference" means (beyond the obvious), and how this applies to Image Online Design and their .web registry.
It certainly seems to me that IOD is the .web pioneer, and hence should be given a preference in ICANN's decisions. Would somebody please explain why this might not be the case?
S. Hudgens

Message Thread:

.web Application by Image Online Design dba Web Registry — Moderator, October 7 @ 9:53 PM (126/442)

My final views on Image Online. — cgrady, November 6 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
IOD is a globally recogized stable registry — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 5 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)

Final Letter of Support for .web and Image Online Design — S. Hudgens, November 5 @ 11:21 PM (1/1)

Thanks to everyone who posted!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 6 @ 1:12 AM (0/0)

In RegLand.com already 280 of the TOP 520 .web names are "preregistered". — friedrich, November 5 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
Say YES! to IOD — first1, November 5 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)
Very serious legal concerns regarding trademark law! — friedrich, November 5 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
DNSO warning against "pre-registrations" can't affect IOD, due to its unique and special history — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
IOD issues — useyourhead, November 5 @ 6:54 AM (1/2)

Answer - your presumption is incorrect — cambler, November 5 @ 5:26 PM (1/1)

AGAIN, IOD's integrity at work. This is why they are so heavily supported. BECAUSE WE TRUST THEM. — cgrady, November 6 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)

Pioneer Preference is best way — netizen1, November 5 @ 5:54 AM (0/0)
The TOP 520 .web names belong to 180 people — friedrich, November 5 @ 3:17 AM (2/2)

I agree! — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:17 AM (0/0)
and Netsol with blocked names? — theboss, November 5 @ 8:52 AM (0/0)

Another Positive Aspect Of The IOD Application — dcorish, November 5 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
"Dirt in The Domain Name Game" — jtrade, November 5 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
NO ! to IOD - NO to .web — SayNoToIOD, November 4 @ 7:45 PM (6/7)

You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements — fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:11 AM (0/0)
Say YES! to IOD :) — first1, November 4 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
Sir, you do have a right to post here, however not to distort the truth — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
Still waiting for your answer to my comments. — friedrich, November 4 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
You make no Sense — Merlin, November 4 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
These allegations are, of course, false — cambler, November 4 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)

IOD does deserve an apology from SayNoToIOD — S. Hudgens, November 5 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)

Letters in Support of IOD — jtrade, November 4 @ 7:21 PM (1/1)

They were scanned: 1200x1600 and have 500KB each — friedrich, November 5 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)

Yes IOD no to Afilias/Neustar on .web — pvos, November 4 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5 — Saskia, November 4 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)

Now the links are fixed... — fabrcop, November 4 @ 6:56 PM (0/0)

IOD should run .WEB — H, November 3 @ 11:09 PM (1/1)

I agree... — fabrcop, November 4 @ 1:11 PM (0/0)

Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON) — fabrcop, November 3 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5 — saskia, November 3 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
IOD has earned .WEB through hard work — ar, November 3 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)
Summing it all up.. — netfxmedia, November 2 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
Say Yes To IOD for the web TLD — JaseK, November 2 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
ICANNs silence with IOD must be a nod of approval — jeffrey, November 2 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application! — fabrcop, November 2 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
What is the point of .web? — james fryer, November 2 @ 12:41 AM (2/7)

Did you compare? — friedrich, November 3 @ 3:11 AM (1/4)

.WEB still seems pointless — james fryer, November 3 @ 9:50 AM (1/3)

Why pointless? — friedrich, November 3 @ 11:23 PM (1/2)

Because it doesn't tell you anything you don't already know — james fryer, November 4 @ 10:48 AM (1/1)

No arguments against .web — friedrich, November 4 @ 9:45 PM (0/0)

<sigh> — For The People, November 2 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)

.WEB — james fryer, November 3 @ 9:52 AM (0/0)

IOD and the Texas republic — SayNoToIOD, November 2 @ 6:58 AM (4/5)

Are you a "self-proclaimed authority"? — friedrich, November 3 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)
This comparison is completely wrong — fabrcop, November 2 @ 9:56 AM (0/0)
Metaphors — For The People, November 2 @ 7:34 AM (0/0)
Texans... — rlangsford, November 2 @ 7:16 AM (1/1)

Texas note — PHXbird, November 2 @ 8:03 PM (0/0)

Give Image Online Design .WEB // Give Afilias .INFO — worldwide, November 2 @ 5:48 AM (0/0)
Alert: Conflicts of Interest Addressed — VikashPatel, November 2 @ 4:59 AM (1/1)

Conflict of interest — rlangsford, November 2 @ 6:52 AM (0/0)

IOD application for .web makes sense to me — veronica, November 2 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)
Moral rights — fabrcop, November 1 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
.............Why IOD? Over 20,025 Reasons Why — y2k, October 30 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)
ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world — fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:13 PM (2/5)

Grant .WEB to IODesign // Grant .INFO to Afilias — worldwide, November 2 @ 5:54 AM (1/1)

No, monopolies should not be given any domian names — ar, November 3 @ 6:54 AM (0/0)

I agree... — tcleland, October 31 @ 7:39 PM (1/2)

Well said (the perfect choice is: IOD/.web ; Afilias/.info ; Neustar/.site ) — fabrcop, November 1 @ 8:53 AM (1/1)

Do Afilias and Neustar deserve some sort of door prize? — jeffrey, November 2 @ 3:13 PM (0/0)

Ethics in Government: ICANN's Role in .web — mbrittan, October 29 @ 10:57 PM (3/5)

IOD's "prior occupation" — tcleland, October 31 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)
Are we men of little faith when it comes to ICANN? — rlangsford, October 30 @ 5:37 AM (0/0)
first in what — SayNoToIOD, October 30 @ 4:18 AM (2/2)

Waiting for your comments. — friedrich, October 30 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
Back your comments up! Spewing Rhetoric shows your knowledge about the DNS — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 30 @ 4:43 AM (0/0)

IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion — S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
Desperation — hitz, October 27 @ 6:50 PM (7/12)

Don't you understand that Internet People means IOD registrants?! — fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:31 AM (0/0)
I agree — SayNoToIOD, October 30 @ 2:57 AM (2/2)

Jim Smith — friedrich, October 31 @ 9:54 AM (0/0)
You're kidding, right? — For The People, October 30 @ 7:12 AM (0/0)

Hitz=Wiredz=Moron — dtan, October 28 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
Is this the best you can do? — cambler, October 27 @ 9:02 PM (2/3)

Some messages don't deserve a response. — S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 1:39 PM (0/0)
Nice To Have You Back! — Mario, October 27 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)

Not quite back :-) — cambler, October 27 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)

Prove it. — For The People, October 27 @ 8:05 PM (0/0)
Hear Is What We Fear, "hitz" — pilot2, October 27 @ 7:19 PM (0/0)
hitz your an idiot — Merlin, October 27 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)

IOD's Application For .WEB Qualifies, At Very Least, For "Pioneer's Preference" Exemption — pilot2, October 27 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)

I agree... ICANN cannot create a scandal — fabrcop, October 30 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)

ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence) — fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:30 PM (1/1)

Hello? — hitz, October 27 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)

What Happens to the Pre-registrations if IOD doesn't get .Web? — lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:33 AM (1/2)

or "...if IOD does get .Web?" — Mario, October 26 @ 5:17 AM (1/1)

I think that IOD and IOD registrants must be considered together as a single entity... — fabrcop, October 26 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)

vote for IOD - see interview Dyson - our request trademark NSI — ted, October 26 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
the jury will say no — SayNoToIOD, October 25 @ 11:35 PM (3/3)

Now you even insult juries of being stupid ... — friedrich, October 31 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
I don't understand your arguments — fabrcop, October 26 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
Not for anything... — For The People, October 25 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)

The JV Team's wants to turn ".WEB" into ".bigbucks" — TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
who had the original idea? — theboss, October 25 @ 7:37 PM (1/1)

If you're new to this arguement read teh MSNBC article (link in message) — daved, November 2 @ 4:43 PM (0/0)

ICANN vs IOD — Doc Again, October 25 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
To: C.Ambler, IOD . IMPORTANT QUESTIONS. — IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/7)

Answer — cambler, October 25 @ 8:03 PM (2/6)

Hmmmm — hitz, October 27 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)

"hitz", Should We Consider You A Representative From An Applicant? — pilot2, October 27 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)

Please let me know the real meaning of the lawsuit... — IODskeptic, October 26 @ 6:45 PM (1/3)

Lawyers — cambler, October 26 @ 7:18 PM (1/2)

Conflicting statements — hitz, October 27 @ 6:18 PM (1/1)

Not conflicting at all — cambler, October 27 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)

I encourage everyone to read IOD's application - I would like to know what others are thinking!! I — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 5:56 AM (1/1)

Dealing with the past — TLD Facts, October 25 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)

MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:56 AM (3/8)

msnbc-meeks-icann — webster, October 26 @ 5:42 PM (3/5)

You form part of those 16 people who have posted many comments. — friedrich, October 27 @ 3:20 PM (0/0)
Who Made You God? — enforcer, October 26 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
Crocker is conflicted — cambler, October 26 @ 7:12 PM (1/2)

Biased opinions? — hitz, October 27 @ 6:24 PM (1/1)

Is that really the best that you can do? — Doc Again, October 28 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

MSNBC Article:� Compelling!� A Must Read! — pilot2, October 25 @ 10:52 PM (0/0)
Very interesting and important articole! — fabrcop, October 25 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)

Chris — CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
IOD, what does that stands for? — anonymous, October 24 @ 5:56 AM (1/3)

Not Another Monopoly — cambler, October 24 @ 8:01 AM (1/2)

Nice shot at other .web applicants — hitz, October 27 @ 6:29 PM (1/1)

To Correct You Sir, Don't Blame IOD For This "Question & Answer" Forum — pilot2, October 27 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)

IOD and Ken Stubbs — Merlin, October 24 @ 12:18 AM (4/4)

On the Money! — first1, October 25 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
This Article is definitely worth a look!!! — VikashPatel, October 24 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
Your Dead Right — enforcer, October 24 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)
I AGREE — VikashPatel, October 24 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)

Some arguments pro/contra IODs .web ... please read! — friedrich, October 23 @ 7:08 PM (1/1)

I agree — fabrcop, October 23 @ 7:42 PM (0/0)

The truth about .web (short version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:26 PM (1/1)

Excellent Post!!! — VikashPatel, October 24 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)

The truth about .web (long version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:21 PM (1/1)

Vote yes to IOD - there is an indisputable argument for doing so posted here. — joannalane, November 1 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)

The success of new TLDs rests right here... — Rob, October 23 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)
IOD's willingness to field questions in this forum & Afilias' absence thereof — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:55 PM (1/5)

Your answer is. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:07 PM (1/4)

Perhaps... — Hudgens, October 22 @ 9:19 PM (1/3)

Media — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:32 PM (1/2)

I had an interview on Friday....with the National Journal Technical Daily... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)

Interview — Hudgens, October 22 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)

MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY. PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!! — Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:29 PM (2/14)

Facilitator — Mario, October 22 @ 8:34 PM (0/0)
Facilitator------YOU are way out of line. Cut it out! You are spamming this everywhere. — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 7:40 PM (1/12)

World Thoughts — Facilitator, October 22 @ 8:07 PM (1/11)

Reply — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 8:43 PM (2/10)

Remember — Facilitator, October 22 @ 9:12 PM (1/6)

Sir. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:39 PM (1/5)

Thank you both — cambler, October 22 @ 9:42 PM (3/4)

More useless noise here !! — global view, October 23 @ 3:46 AM (1/1)

With all due respect. . . — World Thoughts, October 23 @ 4:02 AM (0/0)

My Feelings As Well — Facilitator, October 23 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
Thank you as well. — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)

Letter of support for IOD. — Hudgens, October 22 @ 9:00 PM (1/2)

I will post it. — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:09 PM (1/1)

Letter — Hudgens, October 22 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)

.web is lousy proposal — SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:43 PM (3/5)

Sir, ... — friedrich, October 25 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
Not again! — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:21 PM (1/2)

That chap. — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 8:32 PM (1/1)

How true — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:40 PM (0/0)

Hey, pal. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)

CLEAR the DATABASE then give em .web — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:26 PM (5/6)

and then 10,000 .web domains are.. — thecurve, November 4 @ 2:01 PM (0/0)
Then clear .com either... (Including pre-registrations taken in 1993) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 8:36 AM (0/0)
Laughable. — For The People, October 22 @ 1:43 AM (0/0)
That Would Breach Contracts — pilot, October 22 @ 1:23 AM (0/0)
Jealousy — Merlin, October 21 @ 11:38 PM (1/1)

well said — thecurve, November 4 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)

IOD - the ultimate CYBERSQUATTER - to be sold out — GPine, October 21 @ 8:11 AM (3/6)

You are indirectly supporting IOD, Mr. Pinhurst — friedrich, October 23 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)
Trademarks! — first1, October 21 @ 4:41 PM (1/2)

Supporting trademarks helps us all -kudos to IOD — pvos, October 24 @ 4:51 PM (1/1)

An address cannot violate a trademark and a domain name is an address — friedrich, October 27 @ 3:41 PM (0/0)

Trademarks & Cybersquatters — pilot, October 21 @ 12:05 AM (1/1)

trademark should be seperate from domains — thecurve, November 4 @ 2:08 PM (0/0)

Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:49 AM (2/2)

Say no to a monopoly. — Hudgens, October 23 @ 1:57 AM (0/0)
Self-proclaimed??! IANA did authorize IOD in 1996 — fabrcop, October 21 @ 1:43 PM (0/0)

When is the decision on .web going to be made? — VikashPatel, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/1)

---> On November 16!? (Who knows more: please confirm, or let me know the correct info) — fabrcop, October 24 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)

....................Why IOD? Over 20,017 Reasons why — Y2K, October 20 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
Let's Discuss the issues...IOD has an excellent plan..People in place..Give competition a chance!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 1:14 AM (1/1)

Yes, Let's Add A Few More Good Reasons — Facilitator, October 20 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)

Illusions — global view, October 20 @ 12:27 AM (7/13)

What does the "we" stand for ...? — friedrich, October 23 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)
Incidentally, "Global View" — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 1:47 AM (0/0)
Global View With A Peewee Perspective — Facilitator, October 20 @ 6:24 PM (0/0)
Your Hurting — enforcer, October 20 @ 6:35 AM (0/0)
Much Too ambiguous answer from Mr ambler — global view, October 20 @ 1:53 AM (2/6)

If I might chime in. . . — For The People, October 20 @ 2:00 AM (1/2)

Actually, I don't mind... — cambler, October 20 @ 2:06 AM (1/1)

Mr. Ambler. . . — For The People, October 20 @ 2:22 AM (0/0)

Fine... — cambler, October 20 @ 1:58 AM (1/2)

why do we ask mr ambler — global view, October 20 @ 2:50 AM (1/1)

Here are my comments to you MR Global....(funny, name!) — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 3:15 AM (0/0)

Answer — cambler, October 20 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
No Illusion — Merlin, October 20 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)

Cyber Squatting — Bit, October 19 @ 4:46 AM (3/5)

cybersquatting? — Ryan4, October 21 @ 8:10 AM (0/0)
Do you know what "Cybersquatting" IS? — For The People, October 19 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)
@iodesign.com? — cambler, October 19 @ 5:06 AM (1/2)

news.web — mbrittan, October 19 @ 2:46 PM (1/1)

Ah! — cambler, October 19 @ 10:40 PM (0/0)

IOD: THE RIGHT _AND_ LOGICAL CHOICE — dtan, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
Support of application for .web — gmack3, October 18 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
TO ICANN BOARD Members: This will be the official string for comments relating to IOD's Application. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:40 PM (2/11)

webs of convenience — timhaynes, October 21 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
.web concerns - please address — David Coombs, October 17 @ 8:52 PM (1/9)

Answers from IOD — cambler, October 17 @ 9:34 PM (2/8)

When is the final decision on .web going to be made? — VikashPatel, October 19 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)
Sole registrar and cost of registry — David Coombs, October 17 @ 10:04 PM (1/6)

Thank you — cambler, October 17 @ 10:33 PM (1/5)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Freezing registrations? Where on your app? — IODskeptic, October 18 @ 2:18 PM (1/4)

Answer — cambler, October 18 @ 7:52 PM (1/3)

OK, E5.1 and E5.2 in your application — IODskeptic, October 19 @ 1:51 PM (1/2)

Sorry - I mean E5.1 and E5.3 (not E5.2) — IODskeptic, October 19 @ 1:53 PM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, October 20 @ 2:09 AM (0/0)

The Marketing of the Dot Web TLD..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)
.web opinion — Stef, October 17 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
Give it to IOD — petemillar, October 17 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
Owning Multiple Domain Names: A Shared Domain Service Business — mbrittan, October 17 @ 9:05 AM (5/5)

.web pre-registrations — VikashPatel, October 19 @ 3:36 AM (0/0)
You have my support....Extremely visionary ideas you have, sir... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 18 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
Marc Brittan's operation — PHXbird, October 18 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)
Nice To Hear From You — enforcer, October 17 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
Mr. Brittan — jtrade, October 17 @ 9:49 AM (0/0)

Dot Web Registry... — rlangsford, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
IOD is the best choice — weblord, October 17 @ 6:33 AM (1/1)

ciforugo — weblord, October 17 @ 6:34 AM (0/0)

.WEB solo puede ser manejado por IODesign..... — ciudad, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
VOTE YES ON IOD'S APPLICATION FOR .WEB. A WINNING CHOICE FOR A DESERVING COMPANY. WAY TO GO IOD!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
I support Image Online for .web.... — pirani, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
I Support Image Online's .web application. — jayt, October 17 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
Friend of a Competitive Internet. — jtrade, October 17 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
Internet� Stability� !? — stuart, October 16 @ 11:53 PM (1/1)

The Internet has already fragmented. This is a GOOD thing. — cgrady, October 17 @ 9:45 PM (0/0)

I support IOD's .web application. — markh, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
Playing fair — British, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (5/11)

tearoom, breakfest, harrods, picadilly, landlady, ... take your chance to register them! — friedrich, October 27 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
OK, Then Let's Recall All .COMs, NETs, ORGs, and .UK — pilot, October 17 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
ICANN knows — BrianC, October 17 @ 5:52 AM (3/5)

ICANN's Warning About "Pre-registrations" — pilot, October 17 @ 2:25 PM (0/0)
To correct you ...... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:21 AM (1/2)

To correct you sir. — global view, October 20 @ 12:13 AM (1/1)

No really, let me correct you, sir... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)

That statement you refer to — For The People, October 17 @ 8:17 AM (0/0)

Squatted? — For The People, October 17 @ 1:50 AM (1/1)

Squatted? That's humorous — jandl, October 19 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)

The Beginnning — For The People, October 17 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)

Read the applications and you will see that IODesign is the best choice for .web — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #5 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:26 AM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 9:04 PM (0/0)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #4 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:25 AM (3/3)

re: IOD and limited liability (nonrefundable reg fees) — pvos, October 24 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)
Why Image Online's .WEB Registry Exists — cgrady, October 17 @ 5:33 AM (0/0)
Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #3 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #2 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #1 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)

My $35 registration fee. — cgrady, October 17 @ 5:08 AM (0/0)
Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)

TO ICANN: This will be our official pro Dot Web and IOD string.......PLEASE POST UNDERNEATH... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:47 PM (18/21)

Support of IOD — jweb, November 5 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
Give .WEB to IODesign // .INFO to Afilias — worldwide, November 2 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)
In support of IOD and the .web appliation — Anthony, October 23 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
I Support Dot Web and IOD — jumper, October 18 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
Manufacturer Supports .WEB — pilot, October 17 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
Don't Forget To Ask This Person For Support... — AdvantaTel, October 17 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)

Special help — PHXbird, October 17 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)

A non .web registrant in support of IOD — md, October 16 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
I think that it is fair that IODesign runs the .web registry — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)
Support IOD — first1, October 16 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)
IODesign is most deserving of .web — .webSupporter, October 16 @ 1:05 PM (0/0)
I support .web and IOD, because... — saskia, October 16 @ 11:25 AM (1/1)

Full support for IOD from Poland! — arcadius, October 17 @ 12:13 AM (0/0)

Break the NSI (DoC) monopoly! — Rob, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
IOD supporter — enforcer, October 16 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
I support IODs application for .web — friedrich, October 15 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
I support .web and IOD — treherne, October 15 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)

I support IOD — sascha, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (0/0)

I support .web and IOD, diversity and small business WORLDWIDE! — Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
I Support Dot Web and IOD — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
.web network — liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)

Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? — friedrich, October 15 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
Full support of IO Designs .web application — friedrich, October 15 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
IOD Application — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
Interlecuctal property is protected — doc, October 15 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)

SUNRISE PERIOD! — first1, October 15 @ 5:38 PM (1/1)

i agree — thecurve, November 4 @ 2:15 PM (0/0)

WHERE'S THE GLOBAL COMMITTMENT HERE ? — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:03 AM (3/5)

Global Concerns — cambler, October 15 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)
Global Commitment By Applicants — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 3:43 PM (2/2)

Corrections — PHXbird, October 15 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
More About Global Commitment ... — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

Touche! — anthony, October 15 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)

THE REAL FACTS ABOUT IO DESIGN — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:22 AM (2/10)

Small Corrections from IOD — cambler, October 15 @ 6:43 PM (1/7)

A question — BrianC, October 15 @ 11:42 PM (1/6)

Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 7:06 PM (2/5)

Well done, Mr. Ambler! I really, really admire you — wiredz, October 20 @ 7:38 PM (2/2)

Still waiting for an answer... — cambler, October 22 @ 5:10 AM (0/0)
Sue? — cambler, October 20 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)

RE: Answer — jwatts, October 16 @ 7:47 PM (1/1)

The Past — cambler, October 16 @ 8:51 PM (0/0)

LIE BE TOLD — fabrcop, October 15 @ 1:28 PM (1/1)

:o� — liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:02 PM (0/0)

I am confident in ICANN's fairness, so .web=IOD — fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
K.I.S.S. — debbie, October 15 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)

Acronyms — PHXbird, October 15 @ 10:37 PM (0/0)

IODesign's .WEB Application — SEZenith, October 15 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
IOD .WEB BID - SUPPORT — Frank S., October 15 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
A Recommendation to Posters. But More Than That--A Call to ICANN — For The People, October 15 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
IOD Lawsuit against IANA — jtrade, October 14 @ 11:48 PM (1/1)

Very useful links for those who do not believe that IOD was authorized by IANA — fabrcop, October 15 @ 9:14 AM (0/0)

Cancel PRE-REGISTRATIONS AT .......IOD — Webster, October 14 @ 11:01 PM (3/5)

.CA is doing it. — JeffB, October 15 @ 9:21 AM (0/0)
IF YOU CANCEL .WEB REGISTRATIONS, THEN SAME FOR .COM, .NET, AND .ORG — pilot, October 15 @ 12:24 AM (1/1)

Cancel Webster's bank account: this is just as absurd as to cancel IOD's registrations — fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:35 AM (0/0)

I don't think so — Merlin, October 14 @ 11:35 PM (1/1)

To Merlin — Webster, October 15 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)

TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot Web/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:56 PM (2/3)

Big mistake — Shayne, October 14 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)
RE: TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: — eedlee, October 14 @ 9:31 PM (1/1)

yup — anthony, October 14 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)

IOD congratulations! A job well done! — first1, October 14 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
I'm Interested. — Abaddon, October 14 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)

Abaddon — Webster, October 14 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)

URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest — Infinity, October 14 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
Image Online Design's claim of Conflict of Interest for Ken Stubbs! — jcowell, October 14 @ 5:09 PM (2/4)

CLEAR the DATABASE and IOD's Suit Threats — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 9:34 PM (2/2)

Sir. . . — For The People, October 21 @ 11:36 PM (0/0)
Sorry, That's Impossible — pilot, October 21 @ 11:10 PM (0/0)

jcowell — PHXbird, October 15 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)

Online Design has worked hard from 1995... — support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
rules for .web tld — jeffB, October 14 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
Come on! Lets have a decent argument! — anthony, October 14 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
Vote of confidence in IOD and .web — anthony, October 14 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this!! — cgrady, October 14 @ 7:08 AM (2/2)

THIS STINKS...I THINK THE MANIPULATION IS OBVIOUS — support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:36 PM (0/0)
Let's go to the source... — marshm, October 14 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

My .web comments for ICANN — BrianC, October 14 @ 7:04 AM (3/13)

YES to IOD — fabrcop, October 14 @ 1:49 PM (0/0)
NO TO IOD — Webster, October 14 @ 11:13 AM (2/3)

Has ICANN already chosen? — first1, October 14 @ 6:58 PM (0/0)
I can't see what you mean! Actually IANA's authorization to IOD can be proved (legally) — fabrcop, October 14 @ 5:10 PM (1/1)

Will You Testify......Under Oath — Webster, October 14 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)

BrianC is right — wiredz, October 14 @ 10:52 AM (4/7)

IOD Application — marshm, October 14 @ 5:06 PM (1/1)

Gene Marsh, read my comments! — wiredz, October 20 @ 4:28 PM (0/0)

Please...LET's stick to the FACTS.....Saying things without giving facts=empty words — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 4:05 PM (1/1)

Gred, read my comments — wiredz, October 20 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)

Wiredz here are the facts — jtrade, October 14 @ 3:37 PM (0/0)
You say nothing. — Infinity, October 14 @ 3:07 PM (1/1)

Infinity, see my comments over your remark — wiredz, October 20 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy — RDM, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/2)

Lack of Internal Controls at ICANN? — TheWebster, October 14 @ 6:04 AM (1/1)

IOD reliant partner — Mel, October 14 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)

Give IOD the .Web Registration — Attorney, October 14 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
IODESIGN'S .Web Registration — Unexplored, Inc., October 14 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
My Letter to ICANN — cgrady, October 14 @ 1:05 AM (1/2)

My One Regret — cgrady, October 14 @ 1:47 AM (1/1)

How right you are! — anthony, October 14 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)

TO ALL ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Evidence why the DOT WEB domain and IOD get our VOTE!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 12:55 AM (1/2)

Another Reason to Vote for DOT WEB AND IOD:� They WILL protect Trademarked names — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 3:52 AM (1/1)

Another Reason to Vote for DOT WEB AND IOD: They WILL protect Trademarked names — Merlin, October 14 @ 4:31 AM (0/0)

MORE DISCUSSION �� http://www.icann.com/mbx/offtopic/ — BxB, October 13 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)
After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices — saskia, October 13 @ 11:08 PM (1/1)

Internet Spirit — Merlin, October 13 @ 11:30 PM (0/0)

It is fair that ICANN accepts .web registry by IODesign — fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:26 PM (1/1)

Here is the correct link URL (see my previous post) — fabrcop, October 13 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)

What's that Afilias.TV site about?? — spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:20 PM (1/10)

self-interests? — getserious, October 13 @ 8:24 PM (4/9)

Not a serious group?! — sstallings, November 1 @ 1:11 PM (0/0)
How short sighted — cgrady, October 13 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)
I Am IOD Supporter And Serious Business Owner — pilot, October 13 @ 8:41 PM (1/1)

Another serious business person supporting IOD — mjordan, October 14 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)

Self-interests? Of course! — JConnors, October 13 @ 8:39 PM (3/4)

Pardon Me, But I did not Pre-register anything...I REGISTERED my DOT WEB — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 5:58 AM (1/1)

IOD's PRE-REGISTRATION — Webster, October 14 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)

You are either very confused or have a self interest of your own. — cgrady, October 13 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)
You don't have a clue what you're talking about. — Infinity, October 13 @ 10:42 PM (0/0)

Previous Post about IOD and .Web — Merlin, October 13 @ 7:52 PM (2/3)

IOD = GREAT CUSTOMER SERVICE! — first1, October 14 @ 5:03 AM (0/0)
customer service — larreeee, October 14 @ 12:15 AM (1/1)

Customer satisfaction is a result of integrity — PHXbird, October 14 @ 1:14 AM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs, Conflict of Interest? — Merlin, October 13 @ 7:49 PM (3/6)

Why do you think they waited untill the last day to submit their application?? — Debug, October 17 @ 2:51 AM (0/0)
ICANN's task (to choose the best registry for .web) is difficult, but I am confident... — fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:47 PM (1/2)

You Are Correct, Sir. — pilot, October 13 @ 8:55 PM (1/1)

You can post this under Afilias thread — fabrcop, October 13 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)

Boring! — getserious, October 13 @ 8:09 PM (1/1)

Get Real! — mpayette, October 14 @ 2:31 PM (0/0)

Serious doubts — JConnors, October 13 @ 7:01 PM (6/28)

Serious doubts — kcrash, October 23 @ 7:52 AM (0/0)
IOD "the right choice" — first1, October 14 @ 5:17 AM (1/1)

WoW Technology — Webster, October 14 @ 9:56 AM (0/0)

NSI unable to respond? — PHXbird, October 13 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)
You can buy technical expertise, redundant hardware, and reliable bandwidth but YOU CANT BUY... — cgrady, October 13 @ 8:22 PM (1/1)

Tech expertise & Customer support — PHXbird, October 13 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)

"SERIOUS DOUBTS" by JConnors — pilot, October 13 @ 7:28 PM (1/1)

IOD has a world class - innovative registry system - They will be "ready" for Day 1 — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 5:26 AM (0/0)

IOD can handle it! — jtrade, October 13 @ 7:13 PM (1/19)

Risk, stability, reliability — JConnors, October 13 @ 7:26 PM (3/18)

Employees — cambler, October 15 @ 8:36 PM (0/0)
So why do they have 0 employees? — hoffy, October 15 @ 7:00 AM (1/1)

Afilias Employees: 0 but they do have 13 Board Members....This is apples and oranges.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 9:28 PM (0/0)

You make me Laugh Connors — jtrade, October 13 @ 7:35 PM (1/14)

Anti-competitive? — JConnors, October 13 @ 8:29 PM (2/13)

......... Mr. Connors - I wonder why you never talk about the premium-services! — friedrich, October 20 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
JConnor, You Want To Give More TLDs To NSI And Afilias? — pilot, October 13 @ 8:45 PM (1/11)

Logical judgements based on fact, not self-interest — JConnors, October 13 @ 8:54 PM (6/10)

NSI Is The Elephant In The Middle Of The Room — pilot, October 15 @ 10:11 PM (1/2)

NSI and Afilias — PHXbird, October 15 @ 11:07 PM (1/1)

Does NSI want a bigger monopoly?? — manny, October 16 @ 4:39 AM (0/0)

JConnors then why ".web"? — anthony, October 14 @ 1:17 PM (0/0)
Your Wrong JConnors — first1, October 14 @ 4:55 AM (0/0)
Reading applications — PHXbird, October 13 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
You miss a point. — Infinity, October 13 @ 9:42 PM (1/1)

Reply To Infinity — pilot, October 13 @ 9:50 PM (0/0)

We are basing our comments of tangible reality not paper promises in the form of applications. — cgrady, October 13 @ 9:33 PM (1/1)

Here Here! — marshm, October 14 @ 3:22 AM (0/0)

.Web is excellent, Image Online have to be the winner — Carlos, October 13 @ 6:22 PM (2/13)

Only a IOD for .web — ciudad, October 15 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)
.web as new TLD operated by IODesign — marshm, October 13 @ 6:33 PM (3/11)

.web — netjim, October 16 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)
I agree — stuart, October 13 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)
.web TLD — PHXbird, October 13 @ 7:03 PM (1/8)

.WEB Registry - IODesign is the ONLY choice — huckers, October 15 @ 9:28 PM (1/7)

UK - Father of the Internet!! — Georgia_Flyer, October 16 @ 6:27 PM (4/6)

Rule Britannia MKII — trademarklaw, October 19 @ 4:28 PM (0/0)
Rule Britannia — trademarklaw, October 19 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
alert! aol user! — DotMorons, October 17 @ 1:41 AM (1/2)

Alert! Win 98 User! — spewtlds, October 18 @ 3:58 PM (1/1)

Followup — spewtlds, October 18 @ 4:01 PM (0/0)

it was during Al Gore's visit to the UK — abigailc, October 16 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy