| |
 |
This
Comment Forum is now closed.
ICANN Public
Comment Forum
Proposed Revisions
to VeriSign Agreements
|
This Public Comment Forum has been established
for comments and discussion about the proposed revision of registry
agreements between ICANN and VeriSign, Inc., for the .com, .net,
and .org top-level domains. Details of those revisions are presented
in the ICANN Melbourne meeting topic paper "
Proposed Revisions to VeriSign Agreements." This topic
will be discussed at the ICANN
Public Forum to be held in Melbourne, Australia, on 12 March
2001.
Comments through Sunday, 1 April
2001
- Is Afternic auctioning off STOLEN and HIJACKED
domains? — mr800king,
April 1 @ 4:55 PM (0/0)
- Final poast- Contract may destroy internet....
if you read anything read scenerio.
— walter,
April 1 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
- I Smell a Dirty Stinking Rat! Where's the Rat? — icanncant, April 1 @
1:35 PM (0/0)
- Would making .org changes be unconstitutional?
Anyone got an answer — Walter,
April 1 @ 6:55 AM (1/1)
- 'Sexy' Expired Domain Names Not Available — domainduck, March 31
@ 5:04 PM (0/0)
- Input from the ccTLD members on the ICANN-VeriSign
contract. — EPo,
March 31 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
- GA position on Verisign contract — EPo, March 31 @ 1:34 PM (0/0)
- Verisign — bud,
March 31 @ 3:21 AM (1/1)
- OK then, take all Government agencies out of .com — hmg, March 31 @ 1:51 AM (2/2)
- .NONPROFIT TLD would be more appropriate — TimHeffley, March 31
@ 1:14 AM (0/0)
- .ORG Should slowly convert to Non-profits — EdIsenberg, March 31
@ 12:15 AM (2/2)
- VeriSign agreement
— mhalaby,
March 30 @ 8:34 PM (0/0)
- Revision of .org
— lKathleen,
March 30 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)
- DNSGA COMMENTS ON PROPOSED REVISIONS TO VERISIGN
AGREEMENTS — DNSGA,
March 30 @ 7:12 PM (0/0)
- Proposed Verisign Agreement
— interested,
March 30 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)
- Domains should be treated as patents (Commitee
on Internet Communication Govt Commitee)
— walter,
March 30 @ 5:23 AM (0/0)
- ICANN Exposed — Garry
Anderson, March 30 @ 9:39 AM (0/0)
- Valuation and Stability in a Deteriorating Industry — Jason Hendeles,
March 29 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)
- Some ccTLD opinions on the new Verisign Agreements — Pilar LUQUE, March
28 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)
- Stanbrook Technology Law Group's comments on the
VeriSign proposals — stanbrook,
March 28 @ 11:42 AM (0/0)
- .org names change unethical for business in general — Walter, March 28 @ 5:49
AM (1/3)
- UK supports agreement - satire (it's a joke) — Garry Anderson,
March 27 @ 11:35 PM (1/1)
- I oppose the proposed new agreements — dpfdpf, March 27 @ 9:46
PM (0/0)
- Are You Blind? — domainduck,
March 27 @ 9:35 PM (2/3)
- ATR supports agreement
— Grover
G. Norquist, March 27 @ 9:13 PM (1/1)
- Contract Verisign / ICANN and statuschange of dot
org from unrestricted to restricted
— friedrich,
March 27 @ 2:06 PM (1/1)
- Please do not take away .org
— jklett,
March 25 @ 2:28 AM (0/0)
- this decision should NOT be made... — rod dixon, March 24 @
9:33 PM (1/1)
- Vote now - Is ICANN acting in Bad Faith or Imbecility? — Garry Anderson,
March 24 @ 6:53 PM (1/1)
- Statement of the Non-commercial Constituency — mueller, March 24 @ 2:34
AM (4/4)
- Support for Agreement
— Geller,
March 24 @ 1:46 AM (1/1)
- Analysis: ICANN will sign these contracts because
they are good for ICANN and for Verisign.
— friedrich,
March 22 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)
- VeriSign provides invaluable service — KirkLancaster, March
22 @ 10:43 PM (1/1)
- VeriSign — CAGW,
March 22 @ 7:16 PM (2/2)
- Verisign — Wrenae,
March 22 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)
- Verisign/ICANN Agreement
— KimHubbard,
March 21 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
- Free .com! End the $100+ million tax on Internet
users —
nat@telepathy.com,
March 21 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
- SIGN AGAINST LOSING YOUR .ORG
— No_no_no,
March 21 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)
- My Opinion Changed, and more.. — woobie, March 21 @ 8:44
PM (2/7)
- Verisign/NSI — amber,
March 21 @ 6:42 PM (0/0)
- Agreement between VeriSign and ICANN — Namezero, March 21 @
5:22 PM (1/1)
- Separation of Registry and Registrar Functions — RobS, March 21 @ 5:36 AM
(0/0)
- Who's really benefitting here
— Mhennes,
March 21 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)
- Don't change my registrar
— DonMorrell,
March 21 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)
- Registry proposal not so bad, once you understand
it —
woobie, March 20 @ 9:34
PM (2/2)
- The .org Registry Agreement
— Johnjames,
March 20 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
- ICANN are against First Amendment Rights — Garry Anderson,
March 20 @ 8:28 AM (0/0)
- Spread the Word - The Media is Listening — woobie, March 20 @ 6:31
AM (0/0)
- Domain Name Site
— dtobias,
March 20 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)
- Sign the protest, numbers help! — No_no_no, March 19 @
8:58 PM (0/0)
- Did The World Forget?
— domainduck,
March 18 @ 12:39 AM (1/2)
- Why Call for the dissolution of ICANN? — Garry Anderson,
March 18 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)
- Missing the point again
— kst,
March 18 @ 1:12 AM (1/1)
- No Morals & No Ethics - Just Disgusting — Napoleon, March 17 @
7:01 PM (0/0)
- Proposed form letter
— cbloodworth,
March 17 @ 6:47 PM (2/3)
- HOW do we advertise the problem??? — CBloodworth, March
17 @ 5:44 PM (2/8)
- Questions to be asked
— friedrich,
March 17 @ 1:55 PM (0/0)
- ...for the benefit of the Internet community as
a whole? — Garry
Anderson, March 17 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)
- Hey .Org holders. Read This, it get's worse... — Merlin, March 17 @ 6:25
AM (0/0)
- Artificial Scarcity and More
— Merlin,
March 17 @ 4:15 AM (0/0)
- This USED to be a joke
— woobie,
March 17 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
- Please don't approve the Verisign deal... I beg
you... please help me... thank you!!! — corycorycory, March
16 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)
- Cross-TLD Fairness
— woobie,
March 16 @ 7:21 PM (1/7)
- VeriSign extension
— memzo,
March 15 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)
- ICANN, look at your own site before revising history. — pcrook345, March 15
@ 3:42 AM (0/0)
- changes to .org — csm,
March 14 @ 9:08 PM (1/1)
- .ORG mandate should not be changed — trauring, March 14 @
3:46 PM (0/0)
- Petition ICANN speaks for fairness rather than
its relationship with Verisgn!
— JohnR,
March 14 @ 3:27 AM (1/1)
- Seperation of Registrar and Registry functions — Dassa, March 14 @ 2:54 AM
(0/0)
- Send comments about ICANN-Verisign to touton@icann.org — ReBoot, March 13 @ 8:14
PM (0/0)
- Registry Agreements
— ChipMorris,
March 13 @ 4:12 PM (3/14)
- What can we do? — seer,
March 13 @ 12:56 AM (2/13)
- TheRegister.co.uk implies it's over?? — CBloodworth, March
12 @ 6:49 PM (0/0)
- ICANN to determine "proper use" or ORG? — adfernandes, March
12 @ 6:26 PM (0/0)
- Stop This Madness! NO NSI
— domainduck,
March 12 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- Points to Consider
— BWSD,
March 12 @ 5:41 PM (0/0)
- Proposal - an objective 2-line summary — Garry Anderson,
March 12 @ 3:45 PM (0/0)
- What authority do ICANN & VeriSign have? — Downstrike, March 12
@ 8:23 AM (0/0)
- Verisign Holds a Public Trust - Not a Private Label — tomodog, March 12 @ 3:44
AM (0/0)
- Web Site designed and hosted by: Maddock Lonie
& Chisholm · Lawyers
— Garry
Anderson, March 12 @ 12:17 AM (1/1)
- keep .org as is but add more unrestricted top level
domains — BL,
March 11 @ 10:46 PM (1/2)
- Joe Sims plays semantics
— A.
Moulden, March 11 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)
- ICANN double crosses public interest and 3rd party
rights... — universal,
March 11 @ 7:56 PM (1/1)
- Stop The Madness - NO NSI
— domainduck,
March 11 @ 1:06 PM (1/3)
- Inconsistent ICANN Policy
— Rebeka,
March 11 @ 8:20 AM (0/0)
- anti-individual corporate policy — jhoffa, March 10 @ 5:38
PM (0/0)
- oooo the 4th reich
— blech_,
March 10 @ 3:32 PM (0/0)
- Is .org really in danger?
— kst,
March 10 @ 11:19 AM (3/7)
- The Biggest Lie — Garry
Anderson, March 10 @ 10:54 AM (0/0)
- Transition arrangements for existing .org domain
names —
rochford, March 10
@ 10:20 AM (1/1)
- Most .ORG do not know - ICANN are cowards — Garry Anderson,
March 10 @ 10:09 AM (1/2)
- IOD/NSI - registry/registrar - NOT the same
thing? —
Rebeka, March 10 @ 9:32
AM (0/0)
- WonderLand — IV,
March 10 @ 3:04 AM (0/0)
- i just found out..
— nosurrender,
March 10 @ 1:30 AM (0/0)
- .org domains — skotadi,
March 9 @ 9:45 PM (1/1)
- ICANN can only lose in making deals with Verisign — Werner Staub, March
9 @ 9:43 PM (1/1)
- The Verisign monopoly is bad for everybody — LGMartin, March 9 @ 9:20
PM (0/0)
- My domain has never made me a cent... — Torgo, March 9 @ 6:15 PM
(0/0)
- .Org jeopardy-Outrageous Idea
— Mkzdk,
March 9 @ 5:19 PM (1/3)
- The proposed Org change
— HandsOffOrg,
March 9 @ 2:48 PM (2/6)
- Have I missed it?
— marcschneiders,
March 8 @ 9:22 PM (0/0)
- Dot-Com Hocus Pocus, The Remaking of a Monopoly — Merlin, March 8 @ 8:58
PM (0/0)
- Leave org rules alone!!!!
— Angry,
March 8 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)
- To ICANN — xande,
March 8 @ 7:50 PM (0/0)
- Rewarding early customers by stripping away their
domains — Fu,
March 8 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
- Stop The madness! NO NSI
— domainduck,
March 8 @ 3:30 PM (0/0)
- Please don't leave me stranded in Brazil! — pcull, March 8 @ 3:12 PM
(0/0)
- Dirty Secrets ICANN Doesn't Want You To Know About
!! —
cgrady, March 8 @ 3:00
PM (0/0)
- CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
— PissedOffLawyer,
March 8 @ 2:49 PM (4/4)
- Leave .ORG Domains alone !
— sphelan,
March 8 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)
- New Domains at CreditApproval.tv — hmg, March 8 @ 1:34 PM (1/1)
- Divest the registrar business
— Don_Thomas,
March 8 @ 1:17 PM (0/0)
- Stop the process
— Don_Thomas,
March 8 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)
- Joe Sims' statement on consensus vs ICANN practice — A. Moulden, March 8 @
7:39 AM (1/1)
- Destroying the Internet with this attack on .org
owners —
AllDotOrgDomainOwners,
March 8 @ 6:51 AM (0/0)
- Do not allow NSI to keep the registry! — kodo, March 8 @ 4:46 AM (0/0)
- .org as a means of expression
— lactose99,
March 8 @ 2:42 AM (0/0)
- NO WAY! — deliberate,
March 8 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
- "no matter how hard you try you cant stop
us now" — vitalogy.org,
March 7 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
- A Solution In Search of a Problem — DanS, March 7 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)
- Who do we officially complain to about .ORG changes? — CBloodworth, March
7 @ 5:41 PM (1/1)
- Revision to ORG domain
— jdominik,
March 7 @ 3:33 AM (0/0)
- crazy american view of law
— domaintrusters,
March 6 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
- History of Internet and WWW - especially posted
for "Popoulos" — friedrich,
March 6 @ 7:22 PM (1/6)
- NSI cannot manage Registry-Registra Combo — djp, March 6 @ 6:36 PM (0/0)
- ICANN is DEATH! - check www.new.net!! - — Rebeka, March 6 @ 5:50
PM (1/2)
- Letter of Support for Proposed Amendment — SBSC, March 6 @ 4:20 PM (5/5)
- NSI is a nightmare to deal with! — jdelliott, March 6 @
3:00 PM (1/1)
- Stop This Madness! "NO NSI" — domainduck, March 6
@ 2:00 PM (0/0)
- Idealab Creates Alternate Top Level Domains — Garry Anderson,
March 6 @ 1:39 PM (1/6)
- Org outcome improbable!
— Luther,
March 6 @ 11:20 AM (0/0)
- http://www.handsoffmy.org
— erratic,
March 6 @ 6:48 AM (0/0)
- .org TLD Proposed Changes
— hodgman,
March 6 @ 4:08 AM (0/0)
- Use of the .ORG by individuals representing NPO's — mhawks, March 6 @ 12:54
AM (0/0)
- Verisign are selling .Orgs for profit RIGHT NOW
at GreatDomains.Com — Domainer111.Com,
March 5 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
- Whose internet is this?
— chellman,
March 5 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)
- Uniform Unincorporated Nonprofit Associations Act — bmasel, March 5 @ 4:59
PM (1/1)
- Confusion over the status of .ORG for individual
use —
whiterose.org,
March 5 @ 2:07 PM (2/9)
- Recharter ALL domains, not just .org — yojimbo, March 5 @ 10:49
AM (1/1)
- Promoting competition / Broad representation /
Bottom-up consensus — A.
Moulden, March 5 @ 8:58 AM (0/0)
- Verisign simply wants to 'gut' a TLD they are losing. — anser, March 5 @ 6:51 AM
(0/0)
- Another .org owner
— Snibor
Eoj, March 5 @ 5:32 AM (0/0)
- What domains are individuals supposed to use??? — ReBoot, March 5 @ 3:39
AM (0/0)
- ICANN Confused ICANN I'm Confused? (Repost) — Merlin, March 5 @ 2:29
AM (0/0)
- No more. Just none.
— ttkay,
March 5 @ 2:00 AM (0/0)
- Restrictions of TLD's Revised
— hmg,
March 5 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)
- Please join this letter and/or forward it to your
representative. — friedrich,
March 4 @ 10:24 PM (0/0)
- FACTS about the "original" status of
ORG —
mueller, March 4 @
8:41 PM (2/4)
- if they are going to do this
— icelyn,
March 4 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
- Self preservation
— tomsey,
March 4 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
- This badly thought-out plan is in the interests
of nobody — ceebee,
March 4 @ 4:10 PM (1/1)
- Unfair to Small Non-Profits
— jcphillips,
March 4 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)
- No provision within the existing Registry Agreement
to introduce registration restrictions
— A.
Moulden, March 4 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)
- Restriction of .org would be a clear breach of
the proposed registry agreement
— A.
Moulden, March 4 @ 3:33 PM (0/0)
- 'Consumer Confusion'
— Garry
Anderson, March 4 @ 12:22 AM (1/1)
- Very disgruntled business owner. — InfraData, March 4 @
12:13 AM (1/1)
- ICANN does not own the Internet — dunos, March 4 @ 12:02 AM
(0/0)
- ICANN - CORRUPT - COCK SUCKERS - TAKING BACKHANDERS — dennyh, March 4 @ 11:38
AM (1/2)
- already agreed in principle.
— jeffbhav,
March 4 @ 10:34 AM (1/1)
- ICANN mess it up
— Garry
Anderson, March 4 @ 10:30 AM (0/0)
- there are other people involved — miemie, March 4 @ 8:42
AM (1/1)
- ICANN is on a perilous path
— tomsey,
March 4 @ 7:00 AM (0/0)
- ICANN needs to re-revaluate
— genem,
March 4 @ 6:37 AM (0/0)
- If you do not stop, choas will follow — zsmith, March 4 @ 6:28
AM (1/1)
- class action — davidovv,
March 4 @ 4:44 AM (0/0)
- .org domains — pchelp,
March 4 @ 2:00 AM (0/0)
- The latest news on the proposed .org debacle — totter3, March 4 @ 1:41
AM (0/0)
- The Real Point Here
— dananderson,
March 4 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
- Network Solutions - the puppeteer of ICANN — totter3, March 4 @ 1:03
AM (0/0)
- ICANN SECRET BENT ORGANIZATION — dennyh, March 3 @ 11:17
PM (0/0)
- Orgs and the next in line is... — Gibbet, March 3 @ 10:44
PM (0/0)
- The American Way
— slen,
March 3 @ 9:47 PM (0/0)
- Missing the point?
— kst,
March 3 @ 9:06 PM (1/1)
- ICANN could be in serious trouble — tomsey, March 3 @ 6:52
PM (0/0)
- Is something broken?
— Keithbrown,
March 3 @ 6:42 PM (0/0)
- How many different defijnitions of non-profit corporations
? —
frankatkinson,
March 3 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)
- We will take action
— carpediem-it,
March 3 @ 6:17 PM (0/0)
- Family names registered in .org — ccd, March 3 @ 3:22 PM (1/1)
- Don't kill my .ORG
— kreol,
March 3 @ 2:53 PM (0/0)
- One More Blunder for ICANN
— hmg,
March 3 @ 2:08 PM (0/0)
- Give .org a break, ICANN and use .NPO — gizmocaca, March 3 @
2:03 PM (0/0)
- Don't kill my .org
— bigtoga,
March 3 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
- Simple way of making everyone happy — illsleydc, March 3 @
8:44 AM (1/1)
- .org was *never* intended solely for non-profit
use —
mikesphar, March
3 @ 6:09 AM (1/1)
- ICANN Garbage! — Merlin,
March 3 @ 6:05 AM (1/1)
- Please don't steal my family name; create .npo
instead. — tekmage,
March 3 @ 5:04 AM (1/2)
- First break TLD bottleneck, then issue .com monopoly. — Thomas Lowenhaupt,
March 3 @ 4:47 AM (0/0)
- Hidden benefits.
— argent,
March 3 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
- Seems self-interest is only motive.... — genius, March 3 @ 4:07
AM (0/0)
- I oppose unfair changes that would affect my .org — whiterose.org, March
3 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)
- For Whose Benefit?
— Garry
Anderson, March 3 @ 2:41 AM (0/0)
- I Agree on turning over The .orgs — hyperlucid, March 3
@ 2:23 AM (1/1)
- non profit organisations and their assets — Essex, March 2 @ 11:31 PM
(1/1)
- "Valuable" domains:
— A.
Moulden, March 2 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)
- "Original intent" of .org — techno-will, March
2 @ 9:22 PM (0/0)
- Conflict of interest.
— argent,
March 2 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
- NAZI Germany Relived by .ORG Owners — cgrady, March 2 @ 8:23
PM (4/7)
- .org co-option — fmouse,
March 2 @ 7:59 PM (1/1)
- secret.org — lucid,
March 2 @ 7:40 PM (0/0)
- Okay if you do it right...
— gtdreamsmith,
March 2 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)
- Don't Take My 2-Year Old Sons .org Domain — lazarus, March 2 @ 6:36
PM (0/0)
- Just realized a stinker...
— zorch,
March 2 @ 6:21 PM (1/1)
- Recalling .ORG Names, Then Selling Them Again ... — pilot6, March 2 @ 6:05
PM (1/1)
- Crooked Dealing All Around
— mchitti,
March 2 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)
- keep .org for general not-for-profit use — vr, March 2 @ 5:30 PM (1/3)
- President Emerita Of Radcliffe College Silent On
Abuse Of Woman's Business — pilot6,
March 2 @ 4:51 PM (0/0)
- How Companies will get around it — strangelad, March 2
@ 4:20 PM (0/0)
- I like it — Nathan.Schroeder,
March 2 @ 4:09 PM (2/8)
- Disgrace — pants,
March 2 @ 3:45 PM (0/0)
- I've had my .org a long time.
— unquiet,
March 2 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
- The whole ICANN/NS thing is wrong — Peej, March 2 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
- internationally..
— 10backwards,
March 2 @ 2:57 PM (1/7)
- ICANN not commercial experience or concept of the
real world! — jtuk,
March 2 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
- ICANN must stop licking Verisign's boots! — andyf, March 2 @ 2:48 PM
(0/0)
- Personal .org's - proposed resolution process — mccalli, March 2 @ 2:25
PM (1/1)
- aol.org, cbs.org, timewarner.org and networksolutions.org! — weitzel.org, March
2 @ 2:23 PM (0/0)
- What about existing .org domains? — tscoff, March 2 @ 2:09
PM (1/1)
- .org Change — selin,
March 2 @ 1:56 PM (0/0)
- Coo.. — PigleT,
March 2 @ 1:54 PM (0/0)
- So... — Peej,
March 2 @ 1:50 PM (0/0)
- This proposal sinks.
— oolon,
March 2 @ 1:24 PM (0/0)
- About VeriSign deal critique here — Alexander Svensson,
March 2 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)
- Org changes — dldegeo,
March 2 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)
- The end of democracy?
— daltman,
March 2 @ 9:05 AM (0/0)
- .org crap — fuckyouall,
March 2 @ 8:03 AM (0/0)
- America home of the done-deal
— Quango,
March 2 @ 7:57 AM (2/2)
- cite on .ORG — zorch,
March 2 @ 7:40 AM (1/3)
- Remove companies not people from .org — BrendanJohnson,
March 2 @ 7:06 AM (1/1)
- Bravo!? — felkedotcom,
March 2 @ 6:40 AM (2/2)
- A theory... — Postel-ite,
March 2 @ 6:26 AM (0/0)
- Decline to support NSI's poor business practices
and customer service! — gwynnebaer,
March 2 @ 6:17 AM (1/1)
- resources — unordained,
March 2 @ 5:46 AM (0/0)
- Nonprofits - What's next SSL Certs required for
all .com's? — thoca,
March 2 @ 5:46 AM (0/0)
- I CANN have illegal internatoinal monopilies? (i
can have bad puns too) — hanee,
March 2 @ 5:35 AM (1/1)
- Protect the Net...TLDs controlled by one corporation
kills free speech — Vox,
March 2 @ 5:32 AM (0/0)
- What about .net!!!
— engs,
March 2 @ 5:29 AM (0/0)
- hands off .org — b!X,
March 2 @ 5:22 AM (0/0)
- Terrible Ideas! — Justen,
March 2 @ 5:12 AM (0/0)
- .orgs are not necessarily that organized — nelsonrn, March 2 @ 4:29
AM (0/0)
- I also protest to the redefining of the .org domain
purpose. — tdavis,
March 2 @ 4:27 AM (0/0)
- .org concerns — eanderso,
March 2 @ 4:18 AM (0/0)
- TO: ICANN... what you are doing is WRONG!!!!!!! — corycorycory, March
2 @ 4:13 AM (0/0)
- ICANN won't keep athority for long... — sauls, March 2 @ 3:50 AM
(0/0)
- Worst Idea Ever, go figure, it came from ICANN — dananderson, March
2 @ 3:27 AM (1/5)
- Why domains must be treated as property that can
be mortgaged — FineE,
March 2 @ 3:23 AM (1/1)
- Verisign/NSI must **NOT** have more control!! — DarkPhiber, March 2
@ 3:20 AM (2/3)
- Why not a new gTLD?
— wseltzer,
March 2 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)
- New proposal — unordained,
March 2 @ 3:10 AM (0/0)
- ICANN's authority
— jgestiot,
March 2 @ 2:55 AM (2/20)
- .ORG is not .NGO
— raver_dave,
March 2 @ 2:50 AM (0/0)
- .org for all non-profit uses, else a tld for personal
domains required — LoneWolf,
March 2 @ 2:47 AM (0/0)
- prevent commercial entities from using .org, yes. — daveporter, March 2
@ 2:32 AM (3/3)
- .org retargeting considered harmful — daveporter, March 2
@ 2:23 AM (0/0)
- .org and schools
— bearded_yak,
March 2 @ 2:21 AM (0/0)
- Where is ICANN? — Populous,
March 2 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)
- RFC 1591 - why break with Postel his legacy ? — dirkx, March 2 @ 2:15 AM
(0/0)
- Grandfather Existing .Org Domains — ncc876, March 2 @ 2:15
AM (0/0)
- IANA recommended .org for personal domains — tdierks, March 2 @ 2:07
AM (0/0)
- VeriSign Domain Name Hoarding? — mtsullivan, March 2
@ 1:55 AM (0/0)
- There is no need for this change to .org — ZHarris, March 2 @ 1:50
AM (0/0)
- What will become of .org?
— nexx,
March 2 @ 1:44 AM (0/0)
- instability and insanity
— dratner,
March 2 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)
- public comments — DaviddesJ,
March 2 @ 1:26 AM (0/0)
- No on changing .org
— jysue,
March 2 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)
- ICANN Mismanagement and Unlawfulness — Garry Anderson,
March 2 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)
- ICANN? Verisign? I Must Need Glasses,
It's Hard To Tell The Difference
— pilot6,
March 2 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)
- and the purpose of this is?
— erratic,
March 2 @ 12:46 AM (1/1)
- Proposed .org changes
— richarde,
March 2 @ 12:45 AM (0/0)
- you've got to be kidding
— mfb,
March 2 @ 12:42 AM (0/0)
- another voice against .org changes — sbronstein, March 2
@ 12:35 AM (0/0)
- .org — jzittrain,
March 2 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)
- ICANN's cozy deal with Network Solutions — missamichan, March
1 @ 11:51 PM (0/0)
- this is ridiculous
— antimonopoly,
March 1 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)
- .ORG changes — cheetham,
March 1 @ 11:26 PM (0/0)
- NSI is the worst company i've ever had to deal
with. —
bobbyt, March 1 @ 11:23
PM (0/0)
- netsol.org, verisign.net, icann.com ... oh, and
verisign.org! — A.
Moulden, March 1 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)
- I'm glad Jon Postel did not live to see this — loggia, March 1 @ 10:59
PM (1/1)
- .ORG craziness — law,
March 1 @ 10:52 PM (0/0)
- Fine but don't make it retroactive — premiumweb, March 1
@ 10:50 PM (0/0)
- .ORG removal — dgabler,
March 1 @ 10:34 PM (0/0)
- Network Solutions TODAY selling .org to Anyone! — weitzel.org, March
1 @ 10:32 PM (1/1)
- .org domains prime home for creative sites — Plasticbag, March 1
@ 10:31 PM (0/0)
- Just say NO to monopoly
— SnakeStu,
March 1 @ 10:30 PM (0/0)
- a friendly message for verisign and icann — willpate.org, March
1 @ 10:28 PM (0/0)
- ICANN mental state
— chuber,
March 1 @ 10:17 PM (1/1)
- Don't give .com (or any TLD) to Verisign (or any
other commercial entity) — shalunov,
March 1 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)
- .org abuse — TheSHAD0W,
March 1 @ 9:59 PM (1/2)
- I'm neither a NPC OR a commercial entity — gregbjohns, March 1
@ 9:50 PM (1/1)
- Leave .ORG alone - Establish .NPO instead ! — cgrady, March 1 @ 9:36
PM (5/6)
- Another .org speaks up.
— ClayJar,
March 1 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
- The Public Comments are a Sham — Merlin, March 1 @ 9:32
PM (1/1)
- Unfair, unjust, wrong.
— gessel,
March 1 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)
- Non competitive practice continues — ozspeed, March 1 @ 9:30
PM (0/0)
- Don't take away my .org's
— atom,
March 1 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
- changes to .org policy
— cassima,
March 1 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)
- .org must be left open for personal use — sickman51, March 1 @
9:14 PM (0/0)
- Revoking .org domains RETROACTIVELY is bad policy — glenstewart, March
1 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)
- VeriSign Proposal
— Don.Heath,
March 1 @ 9:08 PM (0/0)
- Here's an idea — rmRfslash,
March 1 @ 9:04 PM (0/0)
- Very, very upset at the proposed .ORG changes — funaho, March 1 @ 9:03
PM (0/0)
- Cynicism — kst,
March 1 @ 9:01 PM (1/1)
- Grandfathering existing .orgs is not sufficient — kst, March 1 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)
- Determining Name is a right, also restricting .org
in current sitation has null effect
— jwatkins,
March 1 @ 8:58 PM (0/0)
- ICANN pulling a Zero Wing...
— not_fair,
March 1 @ 8:53 PM (0/0)
- Restoring the prior status of .ORG and .NET — kdulzo, March 1 @ 8:47
PM (0/0)
- Reconsidering the deal.
— radioradio,
March 1 @ 8:31 PM (0/0)
- Revamping .org is a mistake
— sterno74,
March 1 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)
- One little problem with the .org proposal ... — NineWives, March 1 @
8:22 PM (1/2)
- Hi again folks! — anthony
2nd, March 1 @ 8:08 PM (0/0)
- Yes! Use of .org *and* .net should be strictly
controlled — toc,
March 1 @ 8:04 PM (1/2)
- evicting .org domain holders is silly — fubob, March 1 @ 7:58 PM
(0/0)
- Parties whom currently hold a COM NET or ORG domain — emolitor, March 1 @ 7:51
PM (1/4)
- ICANN Now Says Registrar-Registry Combo OK, But
Rejected IOD For That Reason Back In November! — pilot6, March 1 @ 7:46
PM (0/0)
- Article 5 is unacceptable
— sethdelackner,
March 1 @ 7:33 PM (1/1)
- Don't forget the users
— Tjp,
March 1 @ 7:23 PM (1/1)
- What are you thinking?
— SirGeek,
March 1 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)
- Change from to rfc 1591 (.org changes) — blizzard@mozilla.org,
March 1 @ 7:19 PM (0/0)
- This violates the definition in RFC1591 (1994) — jeff@boonesfarm.org,
March 1 @ 7:19 PM (0/0)
- I'm concerned about the .org treatment myself.... — bonovoxorg, March 1
@ 7:19 PM (1/1)
- Grandfathering .orgs
— rmitz,
March 1 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)
- .org not just for non-profits (RFC1591); change
screws complying owners — chris@shenton.org,
March 1 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
- Stability of the internet
— friedrich,
March 1 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
- forcing .org users to give up their domains is
unfair —
sff, March 1 @ 7:05 PM
(2/3)
- Too late for .ORG
— cr0sh,
March 1 @ 7:03 PM (0/0)
- Trick? — friedrich,
March 1 @ 7:01 PM (1/1)
- Why not make a new TLD
— ldargin,
March 1 @ 7:01 PM (2/2)
- .org TLD — ryans,
March 1 @ 6:59 PM (0/0)
- How can we dismantle ICANN? Create new TLDs
before dropping .orgs! — jabbott,
March 1 @ 6:58 PM (0/0)
- Changing .org registration would cause many problems. — topher, March 1 @ 6:55
PM (0/0)
- .ORG TOS change unacceptable
— seanano,
March 1 @ 6:50 PM (0/0)
- ICANN please! Don't do this.
— Redacted per Data Subject's request,
March 1 @ 6:49 PM (0/0)
- Must guarantee continued .org registry — dbowers, March 1 @ 6:48
PM (0/0)
- .org domains — bzbarsky,
March 1 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)
- Mixed feelings — dtobias,
March 1 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
- NSI needs to be FAR removed from the database — dannewcombe, March
1 @ 6:45 PM (1/1)
- Hospitals - not comercial but more like an org — Suresh, March 1 @ 6:42
PM (0/0)
- Concerns about .ORG TLD
— NDHolmes,
March 1 @ 6:41 PM (0/0)
- Who makes the decisions? A commerical company?
can you say monopoly? — ethan,
March 1 @ 6:36 PM (0/0)
- Questions About .org
— dagoski,
March 1 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
- .org - a miscellaneous TLD for organizations that
do not fit anywhere else... — darron,
March 1 @ 6:34 PM (1/2)
- RFC 1591 belies ICANN's absurd invention about
nonprofits — jamiemccarthy,
March 1 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)
- Can you say, "gestapo tactics"? — rudelove, March 1 @ 6:32
PM (0/0)
- cost of non-profit incorporation — caveman, March 1 @ 6:31
PM (0/0)
- Bad proposals — friedrich,
March 1 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)
- .org: NOT the Original Intention, and NOT Fair — sabatang, March 1 @ 6:26
PM (0/0)
- Public request for ICANN clarification re: .org
changes — klieber,
March 1 @ 6:26 PM (0/0)
- Changing .org Rules Amounts to Persecution of Individuals — Dunx, March 1 @ 6:24 PM (0/0)
- [Deliberately left blank]
— kodo,
March 1 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)
- Thanks — loggia,
March 1 @ 6:21 PM (1/2)
- This deal should not be approved by the Dept. of
Commerce or ICANN — joseph,
March 1 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)
- Disappointed — dmandell,
March 1 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)
- Leave .org's alone!
— delphis,
March 1 @ 6:18 PM (0/0)
- no mandate, no consultation, no way — moron, March 1 @ 6:17 PM
(0/0)
- Personal users in .org
— elvum,
March 1 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)
- Where do individuals with vanity domain names go? — linley, March 1 @ 6:14
PM (0/0)
- This is just wrong.
— peterwayner,
March 1 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
- Removing non-used or redirected .orgs? — racooper, March 1 @ 6:08
PM (0/0)
- Leave .org alone!
— tapir,
March 1 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)
- VeriSign / NSI should not be allowed to keep .com! — kodo, March 1 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- keep .org as it is
— sandrine,
March 1 @ 6:05 PM (0/0)
- Required Non-Profit status for .org regisrants
is wrong. — Pusateri,
March 1 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)
- .ORG never meant for non-profits -- you have no
right to change it now — klieber,
March 1 @ 5:55 PM (0/0)
- One word — macdaddy,
March 1 @ 5:55 PM (0/0)
- Keep control from Corporate giants — rm19, March 1 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)
- What is 'non-profit'?
— Kutulu,
March 1 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)
- Not acceptable — aqua,
March 1 @ 5:51 PM (0/0)
- Unjust - like most your proposals — Garry Anderson,
March 1 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
- Verisign... For shame.
— raisch,
March 1 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)
- Questions on the Changes
— steelwraith,
March 1 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)
- ORG restrictions
— deephan,
March 1 @ 5:39 PM (0/0)
- Read your RFCs — wesmills,
March 1 @ 5:38 PM (0/0)
- .org domain holders and registrar and registry — mgault, March 1 @ 5:35
PM (1/3)
- New TLDs a much better option. — todd, March 1 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)
- Taking away ".org" domains is a bad idea. — twivel, March 1 @ 5:32
PM (0/0)
- Suits Me Fine — NealG,
March 1 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)
- substitute for .org
— kstillson,
March 1 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)
- Middle Ground? — spudzeppelin,
March 1 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)
- .org for the unregistered non-profit organizations — kabir, March 1 @ 5:22 PM
(0/0)
- .ORG Domain Holders
— baugh,
March 1 @ 5:19 PM (1/1)
- Open Source, .com & .org
— paulbristow,
March 1 @ 5:17 PM (1/1)
- .org fair use — jmcfadden,
March 1 @ 5:15 PM (0/0)
- .ORG no longer for non-profits only — RonG, March 1 @ 5:10 PM (2/3)
- what about .xxx — ender,
March 1 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
- Rights of current .ORG domain holders — slake, March 1 @ 5:02 PM
(0/0)
- .Org registry — droelands,
March 1 @ 5:01 PM (1/1)
- separation of ownership of VeriSign's registry
and registrar businesses — Bonker,
March 1 @ 5:00 PM (1/1)
- Timely expiration
— blogan,
March 1 @ 4:59 PM (0/0)
- Rights of .org domain name holders — mmr, March 1 @ 4:16 PM (14/17)
- "Appropriate transition period" is an
oxymoron. — A.
Moulden, March 3 @ 7:00 AM (0/0)
- Absolutely unacceptable
— ZHarris,
March 2 @ 2:00 AM (0/0)
- .ORG (RFC 920) — zorch,
March 1 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
- an obvious, but bad, solution
— medcalf@caerdroia.org,
March 1 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)
- Withdrawl of .org personal domains will cause lawsuits — charlie@antipope.org,
March 1 @ 5:48 PM (0/0)
- .org domains — wytcld,
March 1 @ 5:38 PM (0/0)
- Some concerns — xenophon,
March 1 @ 5:33 PM (1/1)
- What is a non-profit
— imp,
March 1 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
- "non-commercial" vs. "non-profit
organizations" — alleycat0,
March 1 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
- Rights of .org domain name holders — Accipiter, March 1 @
5:18 PM (1/1)
- Transition period?
— craydrygu,
March 1 @ 5:14 PM (0/0)
- That doesn't seem to answer the big question — mike@enoch.org, March
1 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
- .org shouldnt only be for orgs — floodo1, March 1 @ 5:04
PM (0/0)
- .org was originally *for* personal domain names — mattdm, March 1 @ 5:03
PM (1/1)
- Rights of present .ORG domain name holders — marcschneiders,
March 1 @ 3:29 PM (2/4)
701 Total headers
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy