This Comment Forum is now closed ICANN Public Comment Forum Forum on New TLD Applications II

This Public Comment Forum is dedicated to discussion of new TLD applications that have been submitted to ICANN and the evaluation report on those applications.

---

• excellent article on the dirt — sunshine, 48 seconds ago (0/0)

  ---

• What does this say about the state of entrepreneurship? — Gregory W. Krajewski, 8 minutes ago (0/0)

  ---

• when?? — waynethecomputerguy, 16 minutes ago (0/0)

  ---

• To All Posters......Remember Me?  Voice Of Reason — TeriSue, 40 minutes ago (0/0)

  ---

• Rochdale & Oz Co-op Pioneers want distinction in Ecommece Trust — Rochdaleozco-op, 1:19 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Thank you, everyone — cambler, 1:13 AM (10/10)
  • Thank you from Korea — cello, 5 minutes ago (0/0)
  • Continue full-steam ahead! — VikashPatel, 5 minutes ago (0/0)
  • Thank You IOD!!!!!!! — first1, 8 minutes ago (0/0)
  • Wish you the best of luck — Eric Radtke, 25 minutes ago (0/0)
  • and thank you — sunshine, 30 minutes ago (0/0)
  • Thanks Chris — Gregory W. Krajewski, 46 minutes ago (0/0)
  • Thank you, Chris. — Spectral Web, Inc., 57 minutes ago (0/0)
  • I'm Smiling — Eliahu, 1:42 AM (0/0)
  • God bless you! — mbrittan, 1:41 AM (0/0)
  • Reply — bartender, 1:19 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Attention: Dr. Cerf and Esther Dyson — Spectral Web, Inc., 12:47 AM (1/1)
  • YES, Thank You! — first1, 57 seconds ago (0/0)

  ---

• Dear Dr. Cerf and Esther Dyson — bartender, 12:29 AM (0/0)

  ---

• The JVTeam and dot biz?....who recused themselves after applications were taken... — Gregory W. Krajewski, 12:29 AM (0/0)

  ---

• How Did It Finish?  Could Someone List The Ending Here Please.  I Missed It. — Eliahu, 12:25 AM (1/1)
  • NEW TLD'S  BIZ   INFO   NAME   PRO   MUSEUM   AERO   COOP — TomBrac, 1:45 AM (0/0)

  ---

• I Truly Believe... — VikashPatel, 12:25 AM (0/0)

  ---

• It May Be Looking Good For IOD — Eliahu, 12:21 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Prediction:   Alternate Roots will flourish.....The "A" root server will go down with ICANN — Gregory W. Krajewski, 12:12 AM (1/2)
  • Will IOD Get Justice From New Board Members? — pilot5, 12:20 AM (1/1)
    • I am not sure what will happen... — Gregory W. Krajewski, 12:38 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Even the might of Afilias couldn't take .web from IOD!!! — Doc Again, 11:44 PM (1/1)
  • I think NSI's intent was to force the issue — Gregory W. Krajewski, 11:56 PM (0/0)

  ---

• What Happened To Name-Space? — shawn, 10:50 PM (1/1)
  • Good question — xaero, 11:20 PM (0/0)

  ---

• New ICANN - Give .Web to IOD as fast as possible — Rebeka, 10:42 PM (1/1)
  • This can be considered good for IOD: Afilias has lost .web! — fabrcop, 10:52 PM (0/0)

  ---

• For the record — Anthony 2nd, 10:37 PM (2/2)
  • Right On — sandhu, 10:43 PM (0/0)
  • I totally agree, for the record — saskia, 10:40 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Adopted resolution: Afilias gets .info, noone gets .web now — saskia, 10:36 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Dot Web is FREEZED! — Rebeka, 10:36 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Desperation — watty, 10:32 PM (0/0)

  ---

• affilias — watty, 10:29 PM (1/3)
  • ".web to be reserved": what does it mean? — fabrcop, 10:32 PM (1/2)
    • It means.. — saskia, 10:42 PM (1/1)
      • Thanks - Here is the Resolution. — fabrcop, 10:50 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Proposed new TLD's - .co-op — Peg, 10:27 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Real Player: they are still discussing about dot web — fabrcop, 10:23 PM (0/0)

  ---

• affilias — watty, 10:22 PM (0/0)

  ---

• iii — watty, 10:14 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids,  important and worthwhile — Hannah, 10:12 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Utterly RIDICOLOUS comment by Fitzsimmons about IOD — fabrcop, 10:07 PM (1/2)
  • Pre-Registrations — sandhu, 10:57 PM (1/1)
    • not pre-registration of SLDs... — cambler, 1:16 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Forget It, IOD Gets The Shaft — pilot5, 10:03 PM (1/1)
  • Did We Not Expect This All Along? — shawn, 10:09 PM (0/0)

  ---

• 8 in favor of Afilias, 3 Abstentions — VikashPatel, 10:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Wilson Agrees With Cerf — pilot5, 9:57 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Cerf Likes IOD ... — pilot5, 9:56 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Afilias gets it — sunshine, 9:42 PM (2/3)
  • I can't believe. Here is the "Basket": IOD is not there — fabrcop, 9:50 PM (0/0)
  • It's not over yet!!! — VikashPatel, 9:47 PM (1/1)
    • Moment of Truth... — VikashPatel, 9:49 PM (0/0)

  ---

• dot co-op domaine — mnfcmnfc, 9:30 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Is the Internet spirit really death? And is Icann only reflecting that? Is Money now EVERYTHING? — Rebeka, 9:28 PM (1/1)
  • What A .Freaking Joke This Process Is - FIXED FROM THE START — shawn, 9:35 PM (0/0)

  ---

• It's not completely over. — Eliahu, 9:24 PM (1/1)
  • Looks Like It Is Affilia For .Web — shawn, 9:29 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Semi-finalists — VikashPatel, 9:20 PM (0/0)

  ---

• How can ICANN hope to get away with this? — Doc Again, 8:44 PM (2/2)
  • unbelievable!!!! — sunshine, 9:05 PM (0/0)
  • EVERYBODY - EVERYBODY - EVERYBODY READ!!! — Eliahu, 8:49 PM (0/0)

  ---

• A Question About IOD Going To Court — Eliahu, 8:35 PM (1/1)
  • I don't think .web is going to go to anyone... — sstallings, 9:01 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .travel — TomBrac, 8:07 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Are they going to consider IOD again in next hours? — fabrcop, 7:43 PM (1/1)
  • IOD, In Or Out? — pilot5, 7:47 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Israeli cooperative movement support for .coop TLD — pazfamily, 7:24 PM (0/0)

  ---

• I.O.D. is it good or bad ? — Rob UK, 7:09 PM (1/1)
  • IOD — pilot5, 7:13 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .coop gTLD - the best option to choose — Rainer Schlüter, 6:46 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids necessary and appropriate! — Hannah, 6:46 PM (1/1)
  • Second That! — netverse, 6:52 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Pulver/Peek/Marschel Presentation To ICANN Board 11/15/00 — NetNumber, 6:36 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Chris & IOD — sstallings, 6:24 PM (1/2)
  • IOD — shawn, 6:36 PM (1/1)
    • Slight Correction — Eliahu, 7:19 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Any word on .kids? — netverse, 6:22 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Internet Suffixes — pups, 6:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD is still in it? — VikashPatel, 6:21 PM (2/2)
  • I am not sure! Please correct me if I am wrong — fabrcop, 6:25 PM (0/0)
  • They Aren't In The Basket! — shawn, 6:24 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Good News For Name-Space — Eliahu, 6:19 PM (1/2)
  • Name-Space — shawn, 6:23 PM (1/1)
    • Yes...but — Eliahu, 6:32 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .Shop Not .Sucks From Name-Space — shawn, 6:16 PM (1/5)
  • .sucks? — VikashPatel, 6:31 PM (1/4)
    • Name.Space — VikashPatel, 6:35 PM (1/3)
      • .Shop By Name-Space — shawn, 6:40 PM (1/2)
        • Seems as if... — VikashPatel, 6:56 PM (1/1)
          • Question? — shawn, 7:02 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Dot WEB Decision seems to be delayed? — Rebeka, 6:02 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Quotes Just In From ICANN Meeting On IOD — Eliahu, 6:01 PM (1/1)
  • Scribe's note — fabrcop, 6:08 PM (0/0)

  ---

• TERRIBLE news from the Board! 10 am: Afilias in the preliminary basket instead of IOD, for .web!!! — fabrcop, 5:59 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Afilias — bukko, 5:49 PM (0/0)

  ---

• From the webcast: - Dyson recommends no .web — Anthony 2nd, 4:49 PM (2/2)
  • .Web — shawn, 6:04 PM (0/0)
  • Board going on: both good and bad news for IOD — fabrcop, 5:30 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Global Name Registry: an invitation to stalkers! — mirijam_asm, 4:47 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ? Back Hander — Anthony 2nd, 4:30 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op will add value as a TLD — sukalac, 3:58 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Restricted TLD's - Board Policy — pagehowe, 3:25 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Top Ten Domain Name Results - Most votes was .xxx — marks, 2:43 PM (1/1)
  • topten domains — watty, 4:04 PM (0/0)

  ---

• I Attended Nov. 15  "Public Forum", Watched Applicants Shot Down — pilot5, 2:39 PM (1/5)
  • Question — fabrcop, 2:51 PM (2/4)
    • Answer — pilot5, 3:31 PM (0/0)
    • Another question — fabrcop, 3:00 PM (1/2)
      • Answer — pilot5, 3:32 PM (1/1)
        • Thanks — fabrcop, 5:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Great real-time comments sent to ICANN meeting, in support of IOD — fabrcop, 2:19 PM (0/0)

  ---

• KPMG Consulting LP supports IATA's proposal to manage a new ".travel" — KPMG Consulting LP , 1:27 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Iberia Comments — eherrero, 10:04 AM (0/0)

  ---

• endings first,companies second. — watty, 9:53 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Clicks and mortar — watty, 9:46 AM (2/2)
  • .SHOP IS THE BEST CHOICE — DaveBusiness, 2:44 PM (0/0)
  • .SHOP - Do It  For The People — aaaswt, 12:37 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Support Letter ".air" from Indian Airlines Ltd. - India — Indian Airlines Limited, 9:32 AM (0/0)

  ---

• PricewaterhouseCoopers  supports  IATA ".travel" Application — PwC, 8:18 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .POST - Formal Response to Issues raised in ICANN Staff Report — smgray, 7:53 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Japan Post formally supports the .post TLD — smgray, 7:50 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .POST - 16 Postal Administrations formally support and endorse the .post TLD proposal — smgray, 7:44 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Do you think that ICANN can be objective when many of the conference sponsors are TLD applicants? — USC, 6:43 AM (1/1)
  • Read the 'Vote No Confidence in Ken Stubbs' Posting on Wed 15th (below) - Post a reply if you agree. — JaseK, 2:14 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Please choose IOD.  They offer a refreshing outlook to the internet landscape. — USC, 6:29 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN Board - please review .per JVTeam Financials — griffiths, 6:04 AM (0/0)

  ---

• True Competition — sandhu, 5:52 AM (3/3)
  • Great post. And even more... — fabrcop, 3:06 PM (0/0)
  • ICANN REALLY DONT CARE WHAT YOU OR I THINK — brandon6, 6:10 AM (0/0)
  • Give .Gas to Gas-Filias — Eliahu, 6:03 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Round two on TLD applications — oskar, 5:37 AM (1/1)
  • Round Two — pilot5, 4:35 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Afilias/ICANN in the news ! — stuart, 5:21 AM (0/0)

  ---

• distance between URL names and the problems of price — Gordon, 4:43 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .. suppress competition .. — cello, 4:29 AM (1/1)
  • especially non american — brandon6, 4:40 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Congressmen to ICANN:  Do Not Give .Web To Afilias — Eliahu, 4:28 AM (1/2)
  • URL correction — shayne, 5:14 AM (1/1)
    • Thank You Shane - Shane Has The Correct URL — Eliahu, 5:22 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .shop proves china is not part of the world community — brandon6, 4:20 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .shop a must because — brandon6, 4:05 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Please Don't forget earlier posts! — first1, 4:02 AM (1/1)
  • MUST READ!!!! — first1, 4:08 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Thank you dotNOM Consortium — LauraDVM, 3:42 AM (1/1)
  • Enlighten me — blefarge, 3:45 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Everybody is entitled to a new car — hmg, 3:21 AM (1/1)
  • Nobody is entitled to take you away your car, if you violate traffic rules. — friedrich, 3:52 AM (0/0)

  ---

• I second, Karl Auerbach's comments to the board... — Gregory W. Krajewski, 3:20 AM (3/3)
  • fifth here — first1, 4:05 AM (0/0)
  • 4th, here — cello, 3:55 AM (0/0)
  • and I third it. — bartender, 3:25 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN could you please post the original message board. — first1, 3:16 AM (1/1)
  • http://www.icann.org/tldapps/ — fabrcop, 1:53 PM (0/0)

  ---

• H E Y ! ! !  W h o  E r a s e d  M y  P o s t s ? ! ? ! ? ! — AdvantaTel, Thu 1:45 AM (1/3)
  • Further down the page? — Anthony 2nd, Thu 1:51 AM (1/2)
    • Thanks Anthony 2 But >>> Filter Schmilter >>> My Posts Gone Regardless !!!! — AdvantaTel, 3:53 AM (1/1)
      • Missing posts? — PHXbird, 2:34 PM (0/0)

  ---

• P a r e n t s  N e e d  . K I D S ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, Thu 1:22 AM (1/1)
  • A safer Internet world for children? — sirkreituag, 4:48 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op — johnrowehl, Thu 1:17 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN, More watching than you think! — hmg, Thu 1:09 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Support for .co-op and Answers to questions — awerhane, Thu 12:52 AM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD support — stuart, Thu 12:50 AM (1/1)
  • I  A g r e e ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, Thu 1:26 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Vote of confidence for IOD..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Thu 12:42 AM (1/7)
  • Call It A Trap Gregory — Eliahu , Thu 12:56 AM (1/6)
    • Official Reprimand — Gregory W. Krajewski, Thu 1:16 AM (1/5)
      • I'm A Nice Guy Gregory — Eliahu , Thu 1:29 AM (2/4)
        • The link is through CORE — Anthony 2nd, Thu 1:48 AM (1/1)
          • Thank You Anthony: EVERYBODY PLEASE READ ANTHONY'S POST - (No Message Below) — Eliahu, 5:01 AM (0/0)
        • Yes you are sir.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Thu 1:43 AM (1/1)
          • You're A Good Man Gregory (No Message Below) — Eliahu, 2:56 AM (0/0)

  ---

• We need .kid — shanthers, Thu 12:25 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids must be created! — kallahar, Thu 12:12 AM (1/1)
  • V e r y  W e l l  S a i d ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, Thu 1:30 AM (0/0)

  ---

• The scientific community needs a .LAB TLD — labdir, Wed 11:36 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Can't See .lab? — burradams, Wed 11:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• dot co-op/coop — Jaime, Wed 10:54 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op nearly there? — bob cannell, Wed 10:35 PM (0/0)

  ---

• co-op TLD — KtzShip, Wed 10:32 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op suffix — krisn, Wed 10:27 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Top Level Domains - Staff Report - DotYP (re-post) — Woz, Wed 9:49 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN- PROOF OF CONCEPT — joehowe, Wed 9:49 PM (0/0)

  ---

• go dot coop — lexcoop, Wed 9:43 PM (1/1)
  • Dot-Co-op Yes!! — elizwedge, Wed 10:34 PM (0/0)

  ---

• TO: Abril i Abril and other ICANN Board Members and Staff — sunshine, Wed 9:27 PM (2/2)
  • He means that the public do not support his own CORE applicaions. — Anthony 2nd, Thu 2:10 AM (0/0)
  • ... and only 900 people showed up ... — dansokol, Thu 1:00 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op support — mhuddles, Wed 9:17 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Support for the .co-op domain suffex — jknupp, Wed 9:13 PM (0/0)

  ---

• No .Kids Are you kidding! — jeffman, Wed 8:57 PM (2/2)
  • internet is to porn as advertising is to cigarettes/alcohol — mystwoman, 5:51 AM (0/0)
  • Ready to implement, Tech. Legal,etc. — joehowe, Wed 9:10 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .i from Sarnoff — blefarge, Wed 8:56 PM (1/1)
  • Shame on you!! — mirijam_asm, 5:00 PM (0/0)

  ---

• PLEA FOR RECONSIDERATION - dotyp (re-posted) — Frank Corsini, Wed 8:48 PM (1/2)
  • You must be joking — blefarge, Wed 9:06 PM (1/1)
    • Not Joking, but you are correct ... — dansokol, Thu 1:41 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Some Recommendations of KRNIC on new gTLDs! — peacenet, Wed 8:45 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .name from GNR — blefarge, Wed 8:45 PM (1/1)
  • Shame on you!! — mirijam_asm, 4:59 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .nom from CORE — blefarge, Wed 8:21 PM (1/1)
  • Shame on you!! — mirijam_asm, 4:58 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .per concerns — blefarge, Wed 8:06 PM (1/1)
  • Shame on you!! — mirijam_asm, 4:57 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Only TWO General TLD's? — CraftsmanRS, Wed 8:05 PM (0/0)

  ---

• NAME SPACE AND IOD — DomainDude12, Wed 8:04 PM (1/1)
  • IOD is still very strong IMHO — fabrcop, Wed 8:18 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .biz TLD — str88, Wed 7:58 PM (2/2)
  • Similarly logical point — Gordon, 4:19 AM (0/0)
  • Experience — gordon, 4:16 AM (0/0)

  ---

• I just sent this real-time comment to the ICANN meeting: "Solution for new TLDs" — fabrcop, Wed 7:36 PM (2/4)
  • ICANN "Study Committee" for status of At-Large Directors — PHXbird, Wed 7:54 PM (1/1)
    • Answer — fabrcop, Wed 8:12 PM (0/0)
  • In Almost Total Support — Eliahu, Wed 7:43 PM (1/1)
    • I agree — fabrcop, Wed 7:53 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op is needed — stevef, Wed 7:31 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Supplemental Information for ICM Registry's .XXX Submission — ICMRegistry, Wed 7:14 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op — Toby Johnson, Wed 6:50 PM (0/0)

  ---

• I Support  .Kids tld — WyzePstrv, Wed 6:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Support for .Event — ElectricSmash, Wed 6:17 PM (0/0)

  ---

• TLD.co-op — UHAB, Wed 6:09 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Kids Domain — DFooter, Wed 6:01 PM (0/0)

  ---

• dot co-op — David J. Thompson, Wed 5:56 PM (0/0)

  ---

• I.O.D. registrations — Rob UK, Wed 5:29 PM (2/2)
  • This Question Merits An Observation — Eliahu, Wed 6:06 PM (0/0)
  • IOD Registrations — pilot5, Wed 5:40 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op — ICA Housing, Wed 5:16 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Support for .co-op — ICA GWC, Wed 5:07 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Confcooperative, Italy - Support for .co-op TLD — confcoop, Wed 4:46 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Support of dot.YP — Larry , Wed 4:36 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Support for .co-op from Armenia — J Kenney, Wed 4:29 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .Kids — Tom L., Wed 4:27 PM (0/0)

  ---

• No Sunrise Proposal — hmg, Wed 4:22 PM (1/4)
  • A Few Words About "Sunrise" — Eliahu, Wed 4:55 PM (1/3)
    • Reply — hmg, Wed 6:15 PM (1/2)
      • You Didn't Understand — Eliahu, Wed 6:24 PM (1/1)
        • I see — hmg, Wed 6:53 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ".travel" support from International Business Travel Organisation — IBTA, Wed 4:15 PM (1/1)
  • Can you substantiate this? — huguesdb, Wed 11:59 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Global Telecom Domains Supports .ONE and .GEO — Global Telecom Domains Inc., Wed 4:02 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ONE FINAL THOUGHT — confused parent, Wed 4:01 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN Please Reconsider .shop! — ChrisT, Wed 3:47 PM (1/1)
  • YES TO .SHOP — Reginald, Wed 4:34 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .Kids Content Policy Board — joehowe, Wed 3:39 PM (2/6)
  • "Social Policy Choices" - ICANN properly avoiding them with .kids — allens, Wed 7:03 PM (2/4)
    • In that case — huguesdb, Thu 12:09 AM (0/0)
    • ICANN endorsing Social Policy by refusing .kids — mystwoman, Wed 8:44 PM (1/2)
      • Status quo changes + publication — allens, Wed 10:54 PM (1/1)
        • Who are we talking about? Kids, parents or publishers? — huguesdb, Thu 12:28 AM (0/0)
  • "Social Policy Choices" — netverse, Wed 4:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• error — confused parent, Wed 3:32 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids — confused parent, Wed 3:24 PM (1/1)
  • No, confused ICANN? — huguesdb, Thu 12:36 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .coop — Global Co-operation Inc., Wed 2:47 PM (0/0)

  ---

• support for .co-op — patrice, Wed 2:04 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Vote against the Sunrise Period! — jeffrey, Wed 1:58 PM (1/3)
  • I agree! — fabrcop, Wed 2:09 PM (1/2)
    • Sort of Agree — netverse, Wed 3:04 PM (1/1)
      • Different kinds of trademarks — jeffrey, Wed 6:12 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN - Please take another look at Name-space and other .shop apps — aaaswt, Wed 1:40 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Recommendation for ".air" — Royal Airways, Wed 12:56 AM (0/0)

  ---

• New TLD Applications II - a general comment — David Peters, Wed 12:47 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Vote 'No Confidence' in Ken Stubbs - please post a reply if you agree. — JaseK, Wed 11:53 AM (11/13)
  • Absolutely correct — blefarge, 3:55 AM (0/0)
  • I second this — LauraDVM, 3:37 AM (0/0)
  • I vote NO to Afilias and Ken Stubbs! — First1, Thu 1:48 AM (0/0)
  • No to conflicts of interest — huguesdb, Thu 12:47 AM (0/0)
  • Possibly Ken Stubbs doesn't realize himself that there may well be a "hidden" influence existing — friedrich, Wed 11:02 PM (0/0)
  • NO to Ken Stubbs / conflict of interest — bartender, Wed 4:37 PM (0/0)
  • No to either applicants or ICANN members with conflicts — jeffrey, Wed 2:44 PM (0/0)
  • Actually DNSO is considered so important in ICANN... — fabrcop, Wed 2:15 PM (0/0)
  • No Confidence in Ken Stubbs — Reynaiel, Wed 2:03 PM (0/0)
  • Vote NO to Conflict of Interest — cello, Wed 1:13 PM (0/0)
  • Supporting Vote of No Confidence in Ken Stubbs. — David Peters, Wed 12:53 AM (2/2)
    • These confilcts of interest are harming ICANN — Anthony 2nd, Wed 2:14 PM (0/0)
    • NO TO  KEN STUBBS — aaaswt, Wed 1:28 PM (0/0)

  ---

• support for .co-op — kate, Wed 10:54 AM (0/0)

  ---

• JCCU support for .co-op TLD — JCCU, Wed 9:59 AM (0/0)

  ---

• New TLD (II) — Guy Turnbull, Wed 9:38 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Official Response from dotEVENT — dotEVENT, Wed 9:14 AM (0/0)

  ---

• FATURE supports IATA ".travel" Application — FATURE, Wed 8:39 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICFTU (.union) response to concerns of Intellectual Property Constituency of ICANN — pruett, Wed 8:23 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Argument against new GENERAL PURPOSE TLDs — pooler, Wed 8:20 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Support for .union proposal — UNI,ABoessiger, Wed 7:08 AM (0/0)

  ---

• My thinking. — World Thoughts, Wed 7:05 AM (1/1)
  • Until any internal conflicts of interest are solved... — PHXbird, Wed 8:09 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .xxx rumored to be in contention for a TLD — marks, Wed 6:18 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Support for ".air" — Biman Bangladesh, Wed 6:07 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .Kids Domains, Inc. Application Ammendment — tyrastor, Wed 5:32 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .Kids Domains, Inc. Formal Rebuttal to the ICANN Staff Report — tyrastor, Wed 5:26 AM (1/2)
  • .kids: Your claimed consensus does not exist. — allens, Wed 7:41 PM (1/1)
    • What is a consensus? — kschneyer, 5:50 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Recommendation for ".air" — JET AIRWAYS, Wed 5:02 AM (0/0)

  ---

• There is no  problem with XXX ? — JamesZ, Wed 5:01 AM (1/1)
  • Something has to be done — Anthony 2nd, Wed 5:05 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Want to see something funny? — Anthony 2nd, Wed 5:00 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Recommendation for Top Level Domain ".air" — Royal Nepal Airlines, Wed 4:45 AM (0/0)

  ---

• dot co-op — Slowrider5, Wed 4:17 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Approve the entire "short list" — lapointe, Wed 4:06 AM (1/1)
  • Good choice — fabrcop, Wed 8:53 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Name.Space Response to ICANN Review — namespace, Wed 3:24 AM (0/0)

  ---

• PRESS CONFERENCE CLIP — first1, Wed 3:11 AM (2/2)
  • Some arithmetic — huguesdb, Thu 1:30 AM (0/0)
  • If I Were IOD, I Would Read This As "Hopeful." — Eliahu, Wed 3:26 AM (0/0)

  ---

• RegistryPro — dclawyer, Wed 3:10 AM (0/0)

  ---

• dotLaw, Inc's Response to the ICANN Staff Report — dotLawInc, Wed 3:09 AM (3/3)
  • Selected Comments on .law from the ICANN Public Forum — dotLawInc, Wed 3:45 AM (0/0)
  • dotLaw, Inc. Fiscal Information — dotLawInc, Wed 3:42 AM (0/0)
  • dotLaw Inc's proposal and the "August 15th Criteria" — dotLawInc, Wed 3:17 AM (0/0)

  ---

• JVTeam Comments - Blueberry Hill Communications .kids Evaluation — khansen, Wed 2:35 AM (1/1)
  • Is this appropriate? — lapointe, Wed 3:22 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Please Read:  IMPORTANT - Give .Web To Afilias ICANN — Eliahu, Wed 12:52 AM (2/6)
  • Nice ironic post — fabrcop, Wed 8:51 AM (1/2)
    • Substantive comment — huguesdb, Thu 1:39 AM (1/1)
      • Wouldn't That Be Fun If They Tried — Eliahu, 3:01 AM (0/0)
  • This is a hoax right? — Anthony 2nd, Wed 1:38 AM (1/2)
    • You Think I'm Not Serious!!! — Eliahu, Wed 2:21 AM (1/1)
      • you meant... — sunshine, Wed 12:03 AM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD is the choice ICANN....They are ready to compete... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Wed 12:27 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Diebold Response to ICANN Staff Report (original erased) — marshm, Wed 12:21 AM (2/2)
  • Nobody erased your post — sstallings, Wed 1:25 AM (0/0)
  • Additional information on Principal Managers (original erased) — marshm, Wed 12:22 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Todays meeting at Marina del Rey — friedrich, Tue 11:54 PM (0/0)

  ---

• On behalf of dotNom and dotPro Consortia — dotTV, Tue 11:10 PM (2/2)
  • Rubbish — blefarge, Wed 9:19 PM (0/0)
  • Who's who. — Ucant, Wed 7:52 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .xxx domains - why regulate content at all? — ranolf, Tue 10:59 PM (1/1)
  • Couldn't Agree with you more  , XXX is a must — JamesZ, Wed 4:47 AM (0/0)

  ---

• How many TLDs should we have? — jeffrey, Tue 10:59 PM (0/0)

  ---

• The need for .co-op — tyra, Tue 10:59 PM (0/0)

  ---

• TLDs — jflava, Tue 10:57 PM (0/0)

  ---

• PLEA FOR RECONSIDERATION - dotyp — Frank Corsini, Tue 10:29 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op TLD — megancase, Tue 10:24 PM (0/0)

  ---

• OSSN Is Opposed to IATA Dot Travel Application — OSSN, Tue 10:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids tld — confused parent, Tue 10:10 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Support .co-op top-level domain name — Bob Phillips, Tue 10:00 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ABACUS/Popular Names — Dunbar7376, Tue 9:57 PM (1/1)
  • Agreement — MikeBlood, Tue 10:30 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Tucows ICANN Staff Review Registry Operators Proposal Clarification — rrader, Tue 9:57 PM (1/2)
  • Any comments on the letter you (TUCOWs) wrote to Mr Palage AGAINST the Sunrise?? — Gregory W. Krajewski, Wed 12:18 AM (1/1)
    • Tucows position on Sunrise period — rrader, Wed 7:57 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Damaged DADA interest — silvia, Tue 9:38 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Vote .Kids — netverse, Tue 9:28 PM (2/5)
  • people do not understand the power of images — mystwoman, Wed 4:24 PM (1/3)
    • .kids = censorship enabling. Period. — allens, Wed 7:19 PM (1/2)
      • denying .kids right to exist a censorship in itself — mystwoman, Wed 9:00 PM (1/1)
        • Blocking .kids isn't censorship — allens, Wed 10:41 PM (0/0)
  • All the .kids applicants agree - ICANN must establish a .kids TLD — tyrastor, Tue 9:59 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .KIDS — Josh272, Tue 9:15 PM (1/5)
  • Controlling Content — tyrastor, Tue 9:36 PM (2/4)
    • .kids Domains: US bias? — allens, Wed 8:25 PM (1/2)
      • not true, see above post from .kids Domains — mystwoman, Wed 8:50 PM (1/1)
        • .kids domains application — allens, Wed 10:59 PM (0/0)
    • Support for .Kids — Alyse Rome, Wed 4:05 AM (0/0)

  ---

• PLEASE visit this site — sunshine, Tue 9:13 PM (1/1)
  • Interesting — Anthony 2nd, Tue 11:56 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Neustar Support — Franklin Gene Perez, Tue 8:54 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Is a change of opinion realistic ? — Rob UK, Tue 8:38 PM (1/4)
  • No problem: ICANN Board is independent from the "evaluation team" — fabrcop, Tue 8:50 PM (1/3)
    • You Are Being Naive — Talmage, Tue 8:57 PM (1/2)
      • Even more than that. — World Thoughts, Wed 7:03 AM (1/1)
        • Wait for the final decision. I can't believe that ICANN wants to create a scandal — fabrcop, Wed 9:00 AM (0/0)

  ---

• How many confilicts of interest are there anyway? — doc again, Tue 8:29 PM (2/2)
  • confilicts — newtld, Tue 9:43 PM (0/0)
  • ELIOT NESS where are you?!! I'm feed up with all this undemocratic, non-transparent and — Rebeka, Tue 8:56 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .fam — 2000, Tue 8:23 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Top Level Domains - Staff Report — Woz, Tue 8:14 PM (1/1)
  • Its About Money — Eliahu, Tue 10:55 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Still Thinking About That $50,000 Fee — Eliahu, Tue 8:04 PM (0/0)

  ---

• support for .co-op — deniztuncer, Tue 8:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• NeuStar Response to .web Evaluation — khansen, Tue 7:47 PM (2/3)
  • Neustar more than capable — JoeC, Tue 9:20 PM (1/1)
    • JVTeam can be awarded .biz: that's enough. Then: .web to IOD (and .info to Afilias) — fabrcop, Wed 9:06 AM (0/0)
  • DON'T FOOL ICANN!!!  Your Proposal for .web is null and void because — Rebeka, Tue 8:23 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Another benefit — Mediaevum, Tue 7:37 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids domains, urgent issue!! — Hannah, Tue 7:34 PM (0/0)

  ---

• WSJ Report — pilot5, Tue 7:29 PM (1/1)
  • WSJ = Wall Street Journal — pilot5, Wed 3:47 PM (0/0)

  ---

• WWW Mess — Victor_L, Tue 7:05 PM (1/2)
  • We Need More Generic Names — shawn, Tue 7:55 PM (1/1)
    • Clown.??? — Victor_L, Wed 3:07 PM (0/0)

  ---

• I Want .Shop! — shawn, Tue 7:03 PM (2/4)
  • .shop is the only TLD that makes sense for retailers. ICANN HELP! — aaaswt, Wed 1:22 PM (0/0)
  • WE ALL NEED .SHOP!  ICANN PLEASE RECONSIDER! — Sandra, Tue 8:49 PM (2/2)
    • YES, YES, YES TO .SHOP! — ChrisT, Wed 3:39 PM (0/0)
    • I agree — kend, Wed 4:22 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Business, Developing Countries, and DotYP — Dimitry, Tue 6:59 PM (0/0)

  ---

• JVTeam Response to .per Evaluation — khansen, Tue 6:47 PM (0/0)

  ---

• JVTeam Response to .biz Evaluation — khansen, Tue 6:40 PM (0/0)

  ---

• co-op domain — LoriZ, Tue 6:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Domain Name .co-op — Dan Judge, Tue 6:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• No dashes please (co-op/coop) — squish, Tue 6:18 PM (1/5)
  • coop is really a .org? — sprint900, Tue 6:54 PM (2/4)
    • cooperatives are neither .coms nor .orgs — J Kenney, Wed 3:34 PM (1/2)
      • Coop definition? — allens, Wed 8:02 PM (1/1)
        • co-op definition — J Kenney, 4:21 PM (0/0)
    • Not really .org — Buster, Tue 8:49 PM (0/0)

  ---

• dot co-op — AvramPatt, Tue 6:15 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op — CARS, Tue 6:00 PM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD vs Afilias - Webcast recommendation — Anthony 2nd, Tue 5:47 PM (1/2)
  • Here are the minutes — Anthony 2nd, Tue 5:51 PM (1/1)
    • Great point for IOD! — fabrcop, Tue 6:20 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Diebold — bakerk54, Tue 5:36 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN, wipe out all criticisms by doing what is fair: .web to IOD — fabrcop, Tue 5:07 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Dot Co-op — sdcul, Tue 4:54 PM (0/0)

  ---

• CORE - its a fix! — Anthony 2nd, Tue 4:34 PM (1/1)
  • I still hope that this is not enough to overpass IOD... — fabrcop, Tue 5:12 PM (0/0)

  ---

• co-op.com — lambmarg, Tue 4:30 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Internet suffix      .co-op — coopoakpark, Tue 4:29 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .TEL Paper from Squire Sanders & Dempsey re ITU letter to ICANN — Chalandon, Tue 4:28 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Like cancer cells — pedro, Tue 4:25 PM (1/1)
  • we need chemotherapy — LauraDVM, Wed 1:06 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Proposed Tlds — Ed Yaker, Tue 4:25 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op TLD — weaverst, Tue 4:14 PM (0/0)

  ---

• *****The first webcast begins in 45 minutes — sunshine, Tue 4:14 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .fam — str88, Tue 4:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• dotYP' application - breach of the rules of Natural Justice ? — akelman, Tue 4:02 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Top Ten Domain Names Survey Results from MSNBC - #1 .XXX — marks, Tue 3:48 PM (0/0)

  ---

• If you actually read the .POST proposal - I urge ICANN Evaluation Team to read it — smgray, Tue 3:34 PM (1/1)
  • Fully agree — huguesdb, Wed 12:16 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op — twilf, Tue 3:13 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ARTA Continues Its Strong Opposition to IATA's .travel Proposal — ARTAHQ, Tue 3:06 PM (0/0)

  ---

• What Happened To .shop? — Sarah, Tue 2:45 PM (1/2)
  • None of the applicants had good plans (according to ICANN) — fabrcop, Tue 2:54 PM (1/1)
    • Doesn't Seem That True — Sarah, Tue 4:57 PM (0/0)

  ---

• namespace — watty, Tue 2:07 PM (1/1)
  • my thought — sunshine, Tue 3:14 PM (0/0)

  ---

• MSNBC: Internet’s technical manager Icann narrows field of address suffixes — sstallings, Tue 1:44 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op support — Walden2, Tue 1:32 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .coop TLD — COPAC, Tue 1:17 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .TEL RESPONSE OF TELNIC TO ICANN EVALUATION REPORT — Chalandon, Tue 12:54 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Strong Recommendations for TLD ".air" — airsahara, Tue 12:05 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Citibank continued support for IATA proposal — telfer, Tue 11:34 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ".travel" would become guarantee for high quality service — Paul Mencinger, Tue 11:28 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Seems Greatdomains.Com Is Now Projecting A Winner — Mario, Tue 8:21 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Abacus collected 700+ signatures for .fam and .cool — Formal Response, Tue 8:12 AM (1/1)
  • .fam and .cool  extensions — eddiel, Tue 10:29 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Review of The Domain Name Supporting Organization — jtrade, Tue 7:52 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Human Bios GmbH Switzerland supports the following exerbts from reviewed texts concerning trademarks — friedrich, Tue 7:17 AM (2/2)
  • Well done — huguesdb, Wed 12:26 AM (0/0)
  • Good Points, ICANN should read this — kend, Tue 8:01 AM (0/0)

  ---

• I guess you all have seen this? — sunshine, Tue 7:15 AM (5/6)
  • The Sunrise period scorse highly — Anthony 2nd, Wed 4:53 AM (1/1)
    • Anthony, That Is What They Want You To Say — Eliahu , Thu 12:48 AM (0/0)
  • No reply — huguesdb, Wed 12:30 AM (0/0)
  • So does the buck stop at what's fixable? — mystwoman, Tue 1:49 PM (0/0)
  • Fascinating Reading — Eliahu, Tue 8:17 AM (0/0)
  • IPC evaluation of Personal Domain name category applicants — sking, Tue 7:52 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Dear ICANN — bartender, Tue 7:05 AM (1/1)
  • I agree: competition means IOD instead of Afilias — fabrcop, Tue 5:25 PM (0/0)

  ---

• XXX or SEX Why not — gecs, Tue 6:54 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN promoting monpolies — christiang, Tue 6:30 AM (2/3)
  • Korean want various new TLD — kim, Tue 2:54 PM (0/0)
  • ICANN  must give a chance to all companies. — kim, Tue 2:44 PM (1/1)
    • ICANN must prepare vote for all new TLDs — kim, Tue 2:58 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Regarding the "ICANN Report" for .DIR — Scott_I, Tue 6:26 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Abacus/Names4Ever: More Private Registrars! — werebear, Tue 6:25 AM (1/1)
  • I agree — kend, Tue 7:39 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .XXX most wanted yet not approved by ICANN — christiang, Tue 6:24 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Regarding the "Summary" for .DIR — Scott_I, Tue 6:23 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .DIR and the Aug. 15th Evaluation Criteria — Scott_I, Tue 6:19 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Abacus/Names4ever — werebear, Tue 6:15 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .BIZ not enough .INC also needed — christiang, Tue 6:10 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op TDL a Must! — Preacherman, Tue 5:31 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN bias towards .per from JVTeam — jpolaski, Tue 4:11 AM (0/0)

  ---

• News Article Quoting "World Thoughts" — jtrade, Tue 4:11 AM (2/2)
  • Great Article, as far as XXX — christiang, Tue 6:43 AM (0/0)
  • : ) — World Thoughts, Tue 4:16 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Tourism Tasmania support IATA Proposal — asprott, Tue 2:56 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Fragmentation — jtrade, Tue 2:54 AM (0/0)

  ---

• REPORTERS: I'VE GOT AN ANGLE — smart, Tue 2:32 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Afilias' subcontractor - TUCOWs - writes a letter AGAINST the Sunrise Proposal...15 Apr 00 — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 2:31 AM (3/5)
  • Oh my goodness! — sunshine, Tue 4:46 AM (0/0)
  • Letter from a Lawyer Explaining why the Sunrise cannot be implemented — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 2:58 AM (0/0)
  • US Small Business Administration is AGAINST the Sunrise Proposal — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 2:55 AM (2/2)
    • might as well have the SBA watch, too — sunshine, Tue 5:21 AM (0/0)
    • TO ICANN:   Image Online Design has a LEGAL mechanism that will work... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 3:13 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Abacus — Ernie, Tue 2:29 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Baseless Legal Threats — kristopher, Tue 2:28 AM (4/13)
  • Dont be silly — Anthony 2nd, Tue 5:41 PM (0/0)
  • No intimidation: it's simply natural that IOD would sue ICANN — fabrcop, Tue 2:15 PM (0/0)
  • Legal Intimidation, Response To "kristopher" — pilot5, Tue 2:48 AM (1/8)
    • You're very confused — kristopher, Tue 3:11 AM (3/7)
      • Okay, Here's An Analogy — pilot5, Tue 8:16 PM (0/0)
      • Not Confused, Just Educated And Did My Homework, Unlike You — pilot5, Tue 4:17 AM (1/2)
        • How does indemnification = intimidation? — kristopher, Tue 4:51 AM (1/1)
          • Answer — pilot5, Tue 8:08 PM (0/0)
      • Kris.... — World Thoughts, Tue 4:05 AM (1/2)
        • World.... — kristopher, Tue 4:43 AM (1/1)
          • Reply — World Thoughts, Tue 6:11 AM (0/0)
  • Then by merit, IOD should have the .web registry — ZoSo, Tue 2:44 AM (1/1)
    • IOD should have the .web registry — HarryA, Tue 1:18 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Technical and Business Objections are Circular Reasoning — smart, Tue 2:20 AM (1/1)
  • Interesting argument — fabrcop, Tue 5:44 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Postings in Favor of IOD Erased — smart, Tue 2:16 AM (1/4)
  • Erased IOD Posts — pilot5, Tue 2:38 AM (1/3)
    • Erased IOD Posts - — HarryA, Tue 1:08 PM (1/2)
      • Go to the bottom to see the old posts — fabrcop, Tue 2:07 PM (1/1)
        • Yes — HarryA, Tue 3:23 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN Make the Right Decision - Award .web to IOD — ZoSo, Tue 1:20 AM (1/3)
  • I agree! — sunshine, Tue 1:43 AM (1/2)
    • wow — netfxmedia, Tue 4:46 AM (1/1)
      • my answer — sunshine, Tue 5:58 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Thank you all! — saskia, Tue 12:01 AM (1/1)
  • yes, thank all of you — sunshine, Tue 12:18 AM (0/0)

  ---

• I'm lukewarm on the co-op TLD — jeffrey, Mon 11:40 PM (2/2)
  • agreed - 3 letter domains gTLDs only please — squish, Tue 6:24 PM (0/0)
  • Response — J Kenney, Tue 2:41 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .fam — twilson, Mon 11:26 PM (1/1)
  • These postings sound kind of copied, or am I wrong? — Schultz-Famtld, Tue 2:37 PM (0/0)

  ---

• approve .co-op — obpeoples, Mon 11:25 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .fam — yvesl, Mon 11:07 PM (1/1)
  • Exactly — scottl, Mon 11:37 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .fam — thomasg, Mon 10:52 PM (2/2)
  • .fam — sartura, Mon 11:24 PM (0/0)
  • Yeah, BUT — newtld, Mon 11:02 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Headed for Big Legal Problems — dandb, Mon 10:48 PM (2/2)
  • what you can do — sunshine, Mon 11:38 PM (0/0)
  • ICANN — newtld, Mon 11:04 PM (0/0)

  ---

• We need a .KIDS — wdlesch, Mon 10:41 PM (3/4)
  • ICANN is setting policy right now — tyrastor, Tue 6:30 PM (0/0)
  • Dot Kids — jeffrey, Mon 11:07 PM (1/1)
    • .xxx-and .kids-"The "Family" business on the web — mystwoman, Tue 2:08 PM (0/0)
  • Very True , same goes for .COOL and .FAM — scottl, Mon 11:02 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Proposed Internet Suffix .co-op — Crosenthal, Mon 10:36 PM (1/1)
  • Yeah, BUT — newtld, Mon 11:06 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Questionable application evaluation — mediaevum, Mon 10:20 PM (2/3)
  • case in point — sunshine, Mon 11:46 PM (0/0)
  • IOD — newtld, Mon 11:07 PM (1/1)
    • Yes — HarryA, Tue 1:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• make .co-op a first round choice — Karen Zimbelman, Mon 10:16 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN - let the Internet Folks VOTE!!! — Rebeka, Mon 10:08 PM (2/2)
  • IOD would get .web — HarryA, Tue 1:12 PM (0/0)
  • YES — newtld, Mon 11:08 PM (0/0)

  ---

• A voice vote by a small group of virtually unknown people meeting at a Marriott hotel changes the — Rebeka, Mon 10:07 PM (1/1)
  • Is the US really heading this way? — Doc again, Tue 1:08 AM (0/0)

  ---

• NRECA Supports dot co-op — ndm0@nreca.org, Mon 10:01 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Being intentionally overcritical of IOD application — moster, Mon 9:34 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ASTA Response to Staff Report on .travel — stephm, Mon 9:33 PM (0/0)

  ---

• by low-cal — firelegend, Mon 9:13 PM (1/2)
  • by low-cal — pilot5, Mon 9:29 PM (1/1)
    • again — firelegend, Tue 8:30 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .union - biased against anti-union speakers? — allens, Mon 9:11 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .health: WHO biases — allens, Mon 9:07 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Diebold Incorporated response to ICANN Staff Report — marshm, Mon 9:05 PM (1/4)
  • Additional information on Key Diebold Personnel — marshm, Mon 9:13 PM (3/3)
    • Thanks Diebold — lapointe, Tue 3:03 PM (0/0)
    • Benefits of Diebold are obvious — Ray, Tue 4:37 AM (0/0)
    • diebold — walkere72, Mon 10:19 PM (0/0)

  ---

• NAHC Supports .co-op! — Mgates, Mon 8:56 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Off Topic, Sorry -- To: M Lynn — netfxmedia, Mon 8:30 PM (1/3)
  • email addy — sunshine, Mon 8:50 PM (1/2)
    • My email to you — netfxmedia, Mon 10:59 PM (1/1)
      • thanks — sunshine, Mon 11:32 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co op — billuser, Mon 8:28 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .FAM and .XXX perfect way to segregate the Web — nickl, Mon 8:02 PM (1/1)
  • Experience Counts — MikeBlood, Mon 10:43 PM (0/0)

  ---

• RegistryPro Response to ICANN initial evaluation — ebroitman, Mon 7:48 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Abacus needs your support — Formal response, Mon 7:41 PM (1/1)
  • Abacus should be a Registry — dstanford, Mon 10:57 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Myths and reality — Formal response, Mon 7:38 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Abacus' formal response to ICANN staff report — Formal response, Mon 7:34 PM (3/6)
  • Strong case for these TLD's for Abacus - ICANN is the one that's undersized — marks, Mon 11:53 PM (1/1)
    • I can't agree more — kend, Tue 9:21 AM (0/0)
  • ICANN CANN't see.... — newtld, Mon 10:59 PM (0/0)
  • Correction to Abacus's response — cambler, Mon 7:48 PM (1/2)
    • Re: Correction to Abacus's response — venzi, Tue 12:19 AM (1/1)
      • I believe we agree — cambler, Tue 1:23 AM (0/0)

  ---

• One final thought — ShawnGarcia, Mon 7:27 PM (1/5)
  • .xxx Won't Work — Eliahu, Mon 7:42 PM (1/4)
    • xxx doesn't have to work — dstanford, Mon 11:10 PM (1/3)
      • Business.xxx — Eliahu, Tue 12:04 AM (1/2)
        • .xxx usage — venzi, Tue 12:30 AM (1/1)
          • NEXT GENERATION DOMAIN BASED RATING SYSTEM — hendeles, Tue 6:32 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .co-op important for world-wide co-op community — davidleppert, Mon 7:15 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Campus Co-ops Want Dot Co-op — Eric Guetschoff, Mon 7:14 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Co-op domain will benefit all — Brad Smith, Mon 7:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Short conversation with Mr Stubbs — netfxmedia, Mon 6:59 PM (2/2)
  • Your questions — kristopher, Tue 4:35 AM (0/0)
  • Excuse Me - I Am Sorry - You Had No Conversation - And You Will Not — Eliahu, Mon 7:23 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .union already accepted? — netfxmedia, Mon 6:51 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .coop — narci, Mon 6:46 PM (1/1)
  • .coop — co-opkid, Mon 7:01 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids — gordon, Mon 4:53 PM (1/3)
  • .Kids Content Policy Board — joehowe, Mon 5:21 PM (1/2)
    • .kids: Scrap. — allens, Mon 10:07 PM (1/1)
      • what's all the ruckus? — mystwoman, Tue 1:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• My last message — gordon, Mon 4:46 PM (0/0)

  ---

• please read — sunshine, Mon 4:41 PM (2/3)
  • Don't forget to include this info: — sstallings, Mon 5:24 PM (0/0)
  • Largest Local Papers — pilot5, Mon 4:46 PM (1/1)
    • thank you — sunshine, Mon 5:29 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Pioneers in an alternate root — jeffrey, Mon 4:25 PM (1/1)
  • excellent post (eom) — bartender, Mon 5:42 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .biz Affinity proposal vs. iDomains proposal — gordon, Mon 4:11 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .Kids Facts — joehowe, Mon 3:56 PM (2/2)
  • let's cut down on an internet latchkey generation! — mystwoman, Tue 1:23 PM (0/0)
  • Supportive Statements — joehowe, Mon 9:16 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Affinity/bizTRAC Response to ICANN staff Technical Assessment — PhilBerent, Mon 3:56 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Affinity/bizTRAC Response to ICANN Staff Business Assessment — PhilBerent, Mon 3:55 PM (2/2)
  • Addition to response - registration renewals — PhilBerent, Mon 8:00 PM (0/0)
  • Good job — cambler, Mon 4:12 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Staff Reports For IOD & Afilias Full Of Foregone Conclusions ... Not Facts — pilot5, Mon 3:53 PM (1/1)
  • Assessment of IODs application was a violation of ICANN's Bylaws — sunshine, Mon 3:55 PM (0/0)

  ---

• to Chris Ambler and others — sunshine, Mon 3:15 PM (0/0)

  ---

• SITA World Travel (Nepal) support for ".travel" application — SITA Nepal, Mon 1:53 PM (0/0)

  ---

• support for IATA'". travel" — Liechtenstein Tourism, Mon 1:48 PM (1/1)
  • Message in support of IATA ".travel" Proposal — AASA, Tue 10:00 AM (0/0)

  ---

• IATA the ideal partner for ". travel" — W.R. Neumann, Mon 1:38 PM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD Made .WEB Valuable Enough For Others To Take Interest — pilot5, Mon 11:57 AM (1/1)
  • Tom Cat, Jerry Mouse and legal troubles... — fabrcop, Mon 6:50 PM (0/0)

  ---

• MelbourneIT/Neustar Need Cash! — jtrade, Mon 11:24 AM (0/0)

  ---

• When the final decision? When is this forum closed? — fabrcop, Mon 11:08 AM (1/2)
  • In a few days?! Read this article — fabrcop, Mon 11:57 AM (1/1)
    • Another very interesting article!!! — fabrcop, Mon 12:16 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Jet Airways supports  ".travel"Application — Jet Airways, Mon 10:50 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Readers of "Tragedy and Hope" would not be surprised by ICANN's behavior! — Mario, Mon 8:15 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Public light, competition, and ICANN — useyourhead, Mon 6:41 AM (0/0)

  ---

• IATA's application for .travel TLD — JAL, Mon 6:05 AM (1/1)
  • I concur with Mr. Kaneko — rlangsford, Mon 7:12 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Thoughts — jtrade, Mon 5:20 AM (2/2)
  • Again, don't be pessimistic: the decision has not been taken yet — fabrcop, Mon 11:37 AM (0/0)
  • Question... — rlangsford, Mon 5:38 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Can anybody give me an answer ? — kend, Mon 5:01 AM (1/2)
  • Ominous observation... — rlangsford, Mon 5:30 AM (1/1)
    • Actually the public IS mostly interested in .web and in supporting IOD — fabrcop, Mon 11:31 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Give the people what they want ! — pedro, Mon 4:53 AM (3/13)
  • Not Political Enough — DaveBusiness, Mon 2:20 PM (0/0)
  • And what about .shop? — fabrcop, Mon 11:24 AM (2/10)
    • My Response - ICANN Kindly Take Note — Eliahu, Mon 5:53 PM (2/8)
      • What to do with Afilias — jeffrey, Mon 9:16 PM (1/2)
        • repercussions of not awarding Afilias a TLD? — sunshine, Tue 12:06 AM (1/1)
          • Egg-on-face factor — jeffrey, Tue 12:40 AM (0/0)
      • I disagree — sunshine, Mon 6:06 PM (1/4)
        • I Am In Favor Of Afilias Doing Well;  Only Not As A Monopoly — Eliahu, Mon 6:29 PM (1/3)
          • and... — sunshine, Mon 6:52 PM (1/2)
            • Let Us Analyze The Pie For A Minute — Eliahu, Mon 7:18 PM (1/1)
              • and one more thing... — sunshine, Mon 7:57 PM (0/0)
    • .SHOP WAS  (i)"CANNED" — aaaswt, Mon 1:13 PM (0/0)
  • Agree ! — kend, Mon 5:11 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Wrong Turn in Cyberspace — jtrade, Mon 4:49 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Results of Top Ten Domain Name Survey on MSNBC- #1 .xxx - #6 .kids — marks, Mon 3:55 AM (3/3)
  • MSNBC Survey — kristopher, Tue 2:40 AM (0/0)
  • Completely Agree — simon, Mon 8:42 AM (0/0)
  • .inc #5 and .fam #8 — pedro, Mon 5:14 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN, Please Provide The Arthur Anderson Documentation, To Clear Discrepencies — pilot5, Mon 2:29 AM (0/0)

  ---

• How Can Register.com Help Staff Afilias,When It Can't  Keep Its Own Staff? — pilot5, Mon 1:42 AM (0/0)

  ---

• About Competition .....Comments made by CORE---2 years ago- — Gregory W. Krajewski, Mon 1:20 AM (1/2)
  • all i can say is.... — noIODear, Mon 1:26 AM (1/1)
    • Oh Dear! — friedrich, Mon 1:51 AM (0/0)

  ---

• To ICANN:  Hoarding Domain Names By Registrars and Other Pleasantries — Eliahu, Mon 1:18 AM (1/2)
  • More thoughts on this... — rlangsford, Mon 5:00 AM (1/1)
    • and the even bigger news — sunshine, Mon 2:37 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Its a dangerous game — doc again, Mon 12:59 AM (2/4)
  • It's A Dangerous Game (above post), A Must Read For Lawyers, DOJ, Barbara Boxer — pilot5, Mon 4:25 AM (0/0)
  • there has been more than ample time — sunshine, Mon 3:04 AM (2/2)
    • Are You Kidding - ICANN Reply???!!! — Eliahu, Mon 7:12 AM (0/0)
    • I Think its for theirown protection — kend, Mon 5:30 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Whats going on? Dont you people HAVE monopoly laws in America??? — doc again, Mon 12:36 AM (1/1)
  • fact vs. opinion - very dangerous game — sunshine, Mon 3:44 PM (0/0)

  ---

• To all the little minded people - guess that's just about everybody. — cyber-cynic, Mon 12:11 AM (2/3)
  • Really not much to say ... — friedrich, Mon 1:01 AM (1/1)
    • two words to describe friedrich... — noIODear, Mon 1:24 AM (0/0)
  • No Cyber-Cynic, this is a forum to talk about the comments made by ICANN advisors.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, Mon 12:23 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Pulver/Peek/Marschel ".tel" Response To ICANN Report — NetNumber, Sun 11:38 PM (1/1)
  • Comment and question... — rlangsford, Mon 5:56 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Dot-Travel Team Responds to Evaluation Committee Report — dot-travel, Sun 11:17 PM (0/0)

  ---

• A Question On Indemnifying ICANN — Eliahu, Sun 10:05 PM (1/2)
  • Answer — kristopher, Sun 10:12 PM (1/1)
    • You Only Answered The Side Question — Eliahu, Sun 10:21 PM (0/0)

  ---

• How dare ICANN insinuate that IOD could '... fatally damage its [the new TLDs] reputation" — JaseK, Sun 9:29 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Gross inaccuracies in IOD .web review — pgreenwell, Sun 8:57 PM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD vs. Afilias (incl. NSI)  -  Comment by Human Bios GmbH Switzerland (CEO = Friedrich Kisters) — friedrich, Sun 8:36 PM (2/31)
  • Ignore these IOD bully boys ICANN!!!!!!! — GoodriddanceIOD!!!, Sun 10:03 PM (5/19)
    • Sir, Do you even know anything about Afilias???  .......That is what I thought! — Gregory W. Krajewski, Mon 12:03 AM (0/0)
    • Jealousy — doc again, Sun 10:51 PM (0/0)
    • We ask ICANN again to request full authentification before allowing access to its official forum — friedrich, Sun 10:33 PM (1/9)
      • My identity has already been revealed by an IOD bully boy thanks!!! — GoodriddanceIOD!!!, Sun 10:53 PM (2/8)
        • The board rules state false names are not allowed. — first1, Mon 1:39 AM (1/2)
          • Replies are not counted as new comments — friedrich, Mon 2:09 AM (1/1)
            • Thank You — first1, Mon 2:31 AM (0/0)
        • ... — friedrich, Sun 11:47 PM (1/4)
          • Kieth Pilbeam — Mutley, Mon 1:41 AM (1/3)
            • Make sure you don't get sued — GoodriddanceIOD!!!, Mon 1:49 AM (1/2)
              • Who is bully boy? — friedrich, Mon 2:04 AM (1/1)
                • We are not going to disappear because of IOD bully boys!!! — GoodriddanceIOD!!!, Mon 2:09 AM (0/0)
    • please investigate further before replying — sunshine, Sun 10:09 PM (0/0)
  • Reply — kristopher, Sun 9:09 PM (3/10)
    • We are surprised by the vast reaction to our statement and the 90% approval of it — friedrich, Sun 11:05 PM (1/2)
      • NSI Charging you $35 for a bulkregister.com domain? — wiredz, Mon 10:16 AM (1/1)
        • Thank you. — friedrich, Mon 11:44 AM (0/0)
    • KRISTOPHER >>> You Are In No Position To Answer For Anyone ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, Sun 9:25 PM (1/2)
      • ADVANTATEL >>> You Are In No Position To Answer For Anyone ! ! ! — kristopher, Sun 9:29 PM (1/1)
        • KRISTOPHER >>> Ignore List >>> CLICK ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, Sun 9:40 PM (0/0)
    • Reply — cambler, Sun 9:16 PM (1/3)
      • Another reply — kristopher, Sun 9:55 PM (2/2)
        • Do you really think Afilias will behave differently than Sotheby's/Christie's did? — friedrich, Sun 11:44 PM (0/0)
        • And another... — cambler, Sun 10:00 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN -- What is your definition of competition? — fcfs, Sun 8:28 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids, cultural relativism & priorities — kschneyer, Sun 8:28 PM (2/2)
  • .Kids — MTolbert, Mon 3:30 PM (0/0)
  • Specific Recommendations — Pagehowe, Mon 5:03 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Marketing plan for IOD's .web.... — noIODear, Sun 8:25 PM (1/7)
  • Excellent idea — cambler, Sun 8:39 PM (1/6)
    • awwwwwww — noIODear, Sun 8:49 PM (2/5)
      • Helpful — doc again, Sun 9:09 PM (0/0)
      • Yeah... — cambler, Sun 9:04 PM (1/3)
        • I would but... — noIODear, Sun 9:12 PM (1/2)
          • Oooo! your smart! — first1, Sun 11:30 PM (1/1)
            • *your* smart???? — noIODear, Mon 1:37 AM (0/0)

  ---

• “Spectral Web, Inc.’s Comments on the Examiner's Report on Image Online Design, Inc.” — Spectral Web, Inc., Sun 8:08 PM (6/6)
  • I Agree — Ucant, Mon 11:09 PM (0/0)
  • NetFX Media, Inc. supports the above statement. — netfxmedia, Mon 6:47 PM (0/0)
  • Great! — fabrcop, Mon 10:58 AM (0/0)
  • YES! I AGREE! — first1, Mon 12:00 AM (0/0)
  • So many different people can see it - they won't get away with it. — doc again, Sun 10:45 PM (0/0)
  • In addition to the our own statement, Human Bios GmbH Switzerland fully supports the above statement — friedrich, Sun 10:22 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Here are the steps you can take to have IOD's application looked at fairly — sunshine, Sun 7:11 PM (2/2)
  • Interesting, but... — saskia, Sun 8:29 PM (0/0)
  • My email to reconsider@icann.org — sunshine, Sun 7:27 PM (0/0)

  ---

• from ICANN's Conflict of Interest Policy — sunshine, Sun 6:56 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Why not get a lovely .web.com name that works!!!!!!!!!!! — goodriddanceiod!!!, Sun 6:39 PM (2/2)
  • What relevance? — netfxmedia, Tue 1:30 AM (0/0)
  • .WEB HOARDING — aaaswt, Sun 6:44 PM (0/0)

  ---

• deserves a repeat — sunshine, Sun 6:34 PM (1/4)
  • a clear Bylaws  violation — sunshine, Sun 8:00 PM (1/3)
    • You got this one right — cambler, Sun 9:02 PM (1/2)
      • I'm confused — kristopher, Sun 9:24 PM (1/1)
        • Absolutely — cambler, Sun 9:46 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Is anyone archiving these forums? — rlangsford, Sun 5:25 PM (1/3)
  • How? — Anthony 2nd, Sun 5:49 PM (1/2)
    • Solution - MUST READ — kjohar, Sun 6:46 PM (1/1)
      • To ICANN's credit... — cambler, Sun 9:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• List of .web trademarks filed — .webSupporter, Sun 3:56 PM (3/6)
  • 3 were accepted and registered. — netfxmedia, Tue 1:42 AM (0/0)
  • ??? - Help: I don't understand how can simple words.web be trademarks — fabrcop, Mon 8:44 PM (1/1)
    • USPTO Will Probably Deny "Generic" Trademarks — pilot5, Mon 8:54 PM (0/0)
  • CORE applied for a trademark on .web?! — jeffrey, Sun 4:33 PM (1/2)
    • CORE tradmark — .webSupporter, Sun 5:02 PM (1/1)
      • Demonstrated use of the .web mark in the application — jeffrey, Mon 1:17 AM (0/0)

  ---

• EUGENE KANG (WIREDZ) EXPOSED — Mutley, Sun 3:29 PM (1/3)
  • ERIC WHITE (Mutley) EXPOSED — wiredz, Mon 11:40 AM (2/2)
    • Please consider these these two points — sunshine, Mon 2:45 PM (0/0)
    • You only confirm that IOD was in the process of creating new TLDs since the beginning... — fabrcop, Mon 2:35 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Chris Ambler — sunshine, Sun 3:08 PM (1/6)
  • Yes, sort-of — cambler, Sun 8:38 PM (2/5)
    • you can make a presentation — sunshine, Mon 8:55 PM (1/1)
      • 3 Minute Presentation — pilot5, Mon 9:15 PM (0/0)
    • I'd..... — sunshine, Sun 8:55 PM (1/2)
      • No, I don't think so... — cambler, Sun 9:09 PM (1/1)
        • my response — sunshine, Sun 9:27 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Everybody Wins With Afilias & Microsoft — jeffrey, Sun 2:46 PM (2/5)
  • Do you have a choice? — first1, Sun 6:46 PM (1/1)
    • what $35 really means — sunshine, Sun 7:00 PM (0/0)
  • Please read jeffery — liquidsilver, Sun 3:12 PM (1/2)
    • liquidsilver — bartender, Sun 3:31 PM (1/1)
      • ! — cello, Sun 3:51 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Serious Conflict of Internest for Arthur Andersen: True Motivation for Selecting CORE and Afilias — remarque21, Sun 2:30 PM (2/2)
  • We are highly concerned about this comment. If this is true it harms the credibility — friedrich, Mon 12:28 AM (0/0)
  • straight from ICANN's Bylaws — sunshine, Sun 7:42 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Please see the magnitude of this - it's not IOD vs. ICANN — sunshine, Sun 2:13 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN / IOD — liquidsilver, Sun 2:06 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Kristopher, mind if I ask? — cambler, Sun 1:51 PM (1/5)
  • Sure, Chris — kristopher, Sun 8:01 PM (2/4)
    • because — sunshine, Sun 8:42 PM (0/0)
    • I'll Tell You Why — Eliahu, Sun 8:21 PM (1/2)
      • Eliahu, mind if I ask? — kristopher, Sun 8:35 PM (1/1)
        • Of Course You May Ask — Eliahu, Sun 9:19 PM (0/0)

  ---

• hypothetically — Rob UK, Sun 11:49 AM (1/1)
  • Look on the bright side (relevant to .web, .kids and all of Ken Stubbs' Applications) — Anthony 2nd, Sun 2:27 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Neustar's Proposal is DEAD by deducting the potential contributions of Melbourne IT in  ... — Rebeka, Sun 10:20 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN, please don't forget IOD's response to the staff review — fabrcop, Sun 9:44 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Neustar's registry protocol XRP is proprietary to Melbourne IT!!! — Rebeka, Sun 9:29 AM (0/0)

  ---

• NSI's customer service — Zep, Sun 8:32 AM (4/16)
  • i agree — mahara, Sun 12:14 AM (0/0)
  • Check your facts! NSI does not have a central role in Afilias — wiredz, Sun 10:20 AM (1/2)
    • Not so fast wiredZ before you state fact... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sun 1:51 PM (1/1)
      • Indeed, it does... — cambler, Sun 1:58 PM (0/0)
  • Central role? — kristopher, Sun 8:57 AM (1/10)
    • Kristopher — RyanF, Sun 10:38 AM (2/9)
      • I am a trademark holder, so the SunRise Period Applies to me — wiredz, Sun 11:22 AM (5/5)
        • Wiredz — RyanF, Sun 10:10 PM (0/0)
        • Your trademarks are unlikely to be valid - sorry. — Anthony 2nd, Sun 2:42 PM (0/0)
        • Please post registration numbers? — cambler, Sun 1:59 PM (0/0)
        • Oh give me a break WiredZ....Tell them who you are afiliated with.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sun 1:39 PM (0/0)
        • You're wrong — kristopher, Sun 11:38 AM (0/0)
      • Sunrise period — kristopher, Sun 11:00 AM (2/2)
        • Isn't your second point actually an argument against Sunrise? — doc again, Sun 9:56 PM (0/0)
        • Sunrise Period? — jweb, Sun 5:36 PM (0/0)
  • ? — Terence Chan, Sun 8:46 AM (0/0)

  ---

• I like the idea, I support  .PID — Faxian, Sun 8:19 AM (0/0)

  ---

• I like IOD — Terence Chan, Sun 7:11 AM (2/8)
  • I have always been saying IODesign was playing fraud — wiredz, Sun 10:59 AM (3/5)
    • You idiot, that means Afilias should be granted all new tld's. — first1, Sun 5:01 PM (0/0)
    • WiredZ is at it again!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sun 1:44 PM (0/0)
    • Interesting point — kristopher, Sun 11:28 AM (2/2)
      • Inevitable monopoly? — jweb, Sun 2:20 PM (0/0)
      • Socialism at work — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sun 2:06 PM (0/0)
  • Gunfight At The OKANN Corral — Eliahu, Sun 7:33 AM (1/1)
    • Wake Up Call — Terence Chan, Sun 8:37 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Questions — kristopher, Sun 6:30 AM (3/10)
  • list of trademarks here — .webSupporter, Sun 4:01 PM (0/0)
  • The same old questions, the same old answers — fabrcop, Sun 8:50 AM (0/0)
  • Answers — cambler, Sun 6:42 AM (1/7)
    • Have you... — kristopher, Sun 7:05 AM (2/6)
      • Trademarks — Merlin, Sun 7:38 AM (1/2)
        • Thanks! — kristopher, Sun 7:47 AM (1/1)
          • Trademarks — Merlin, Sun 7:53 AM (0/0)
      • Answer — cambler, Sun 7:29 AM (1/2)
        • A bit evasive — kristopher, Sun 7:43 AM (1/1)
          • Answer — cambler, Sun 1:41 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Can one TLD compete against another? — jeffrey, Sun 6:07 AM (1/1)
  • ICANN, please say NO to IODesign's application for .Web — wiredz, Sun 12:25 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN -- Please read — World Thoughts, Sun 5:22 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN - Your Bias Is Showing — Eliahu, Sun 4:58 AM (1/1)
  • Eliahu, You're Right, The Bias Is Showing — pilot5, Tue 2:31 AM (0/0)

  ---

• So what's the deal? — Steven Monen, Sun 2:24 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANNS IOD REPORT — Anthony 2nd, Sun 1:44 AM (3/7)
  • ICANN MUST READ THIS!!!!!! — first1, Sun 5:51 PM (0/0)
  • This one pretty much sums it up — saskia, Sun 11:13 AM (0/0)
  • The staffing issues you bring up... — cambler, Sun 2:10 AM (1/4)
    • Yes that seems fair. — Anthony 2nd, Sun 3:10 AM (1/3)
      • Clearing up... — cambler, Sun 3:49 AM (1/2)
        • So its air tight then — Anthony 2nd, Sun 5:08 PM (1/1)
          • ICANN's power model — sunshine, Sun 6:06 PM (0/0)

  ---

• To The ICANN Staff — Merlin, Sun 1:23 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Mr. Jarvis, would you state your affiliation? — cambler, Sun 1:05 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN — colby, Sun 12:45 AM (1/3)
  • I support colby! — Debra Johnson, Sun 8:58 AM (1/2)
    • What a plant! — kristopher, Sun 9:23 AM (1/1)
      • KRISTOPHER - THE KID BASHER — aaaswt, Sun 5:23 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Does 20k regs mean all the good .web names are gone? — M Spaff Sumsion, Sat 11:47 PM (2/2)
  • I agree — sunshine, Sun 4:47 PM (0/0)
  • Plenty of good available .web names on IOD's registry — fabrcop, Sun 8:43 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN — RyanF, Sat 11:39 PM (0/0)

  ---

• "The ICANN plan B": my fears, my hopes and my suggestion — saskia, Sat 11:37 PM (1/1)
  • This is the problem — Anthony 2nd, Sun 12:39 AM (0/0)

  ---

• About the fairness and register — TommyLee, Sat 10:36 PM (2/2)
  • Reply: beware of Sunrise Period (Afilias) — fabrcop, Sun 8:39 AM (0/0)
  • Fairness — RyanF, Sat 11:34 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Competition? Question for ICANN — first1, Sat 10:22 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Non .web name holder about IOD — watchdog, Sat 10:22 PM (2/3)
  • IOD has committed to opening it up immediately — cambler, Sat 11:14 PM (1/1)
    • Answer — jeffrey, Sun 1:44 AM (0/0)
  • I Agree! ICANN should be reading this! — mdo, Sat 11:13 PM (0/0)

  ---

• A SOLUTION IS AVAILABLE — doc again, Sat 8:22 PM (3/3)
  • I think you are wrong on one point — lapointe, Sun 3:02 AM (0/0)
  • An Acceptable Solution — pilot5, Sat 10:48 PM (0/0)
  • I agree, well stated! — mdo, Sat 8:33 PM (0/0)

  ---

• IMPORTANT! A must read! — mdo, Sat 7:32 PM (1/6)
  • Your equation is in error — World Thoughts, Sat 8:10 PM (1/5)
    • By using broad generic TLDs such as .web the existing problems are just amplified. — mdo, Sat 8:21 PM (1/4)
      • What is amplified? — World Thoughts, Sat 8:37 PM (2/3)
        • Multi-lingual system solution. — mdo, Sat 9:03 PM (0/0)
        • in response — mdo, Sat 8:54 PM (1/1)
          • Dot Web is needed and here is why.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sat 10:05 PM (0/0)

  ---

• A Heated Debate to Follow? — VikashPatel, Sat 7:18 PM (2/2)
  • this has happened before — doc again, Sat 8:33 PM (0/0)
  • Politics and Money are on Icann's side! — mdo, Sat 7:28 PM (0/0)

  ---

• NEW and really INDEPENDENT Evaluation Report wanted!!! — Rebeka, Sat 7:07 PM (2/2)
  • I think the right thing for ICANN to do is... — saskia, Sun 12:23 AM (0/0)
  • Hi again folks — doc again, Sat 8:06 PM (0/0)

  ---

• WARNING!  General-purpose TLDs, What for????? — mdo, Sat 7:02 PM (3/3)
  • I disagree with you.......YOUR WRONG SIR.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sat 10:18 PM (0/0)
  • General Purpose TLDs ... Good For My Small Business — pilot5, Sat 9:55 PM (0/0)
  • Agreed, don't  need general TLD's, need specific TLD's. — marks, Sat 7:17 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Top Ten New Domain Names Survey Results at MSNBC - #1 .xxx - #6 .kids — marks, Sat 6:55 PM (0/0)

  ---

• new TLD must for all kinds of people -- need many many new TLD. — jpkim, Sat 6:51 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Comments about Neustar and Afilias, IOD and the review process — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sat 6:30 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Applications analyzed in an objective manner? — Rebeka, Sat 6:20 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids TLD — Neo, Sat 6:18 PM (3/4)
  • Software is not a stand-alone solution, but can enhance a Greenspace — tyrastor, Sat 8:47 PM (1/1)
    • Very well said — watchdog, Sat 9:12 PM (0/0)
  • Child Predators — Watchdog, Sat 6:52 PM (0/0)
  • coppa — netfxmedia, Sat 6:31 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Arthur Andersen (Evaluation Team) and Ken Stubbs ... — Rebeka, Sat 6:15 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Karl Auerbach: "Reform of ICANN - Jones Day must go!" — Rebeka, Sat 6:06 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Karl Auerbach about Jones Day (Evaluation Team) — Rebeka, Sat 5:58 PM (0/0)

  ---

• The August 15th Criteria - "diversity also facilitates enhancement of competition" — Rebeka, Sat 5:35 PM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD's huge merits, that Afilias can only dream of — fabrcop, Sat 5:16 PM (1/22)
  • ... that's why generic Internet users support IOD — fabrcop, Sat 5:28 PM (1/21)
    • What a joke! — kristopher, Sun 6:56 AM (4/20)
      • Sir you may want to check up on Tucows... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sun 11:40 PM (0/0)
      • please understand the magnitude of this - it's not IOD vs ICANN — sunshine, Sun 2:02 PM (0/0)
      • I may be a "funny guy" as you say, but I am still the "generic Internet user" — fabrcop, Sun 8:27 AM (1/11)
        • Statistics — kristopher, Sun 8:47 AM (1/10)
          • Sorry, I am a physicist, so I am supposed to know statistics very well... — fabrcop, Sun 9:09 AM (2/9)
            • You prove my point! — kristopher, Sun 9:45 AM (1/3)
              • Final answer — fabrcop, Sun 9:59 AM (1/2)
                • "I think that this forum is NOT a biased sample" — kristopher, Sun 10:19 AM (1/1)
                  • Proofs of claims — cambler, Sun 8:57 PM (0/0)
            • Rough evaluation — fabrcop, Sun 9:29 AM (1/4)
              • You are a funny guy! — kristopher, Sun 10:06 AM (1/3)
                • Assumptions — fabrcop, Sun 10:30 AM (1/2)
                  • *sigh* — kristopher, Sun 10:43 AM (1/1)
                    • You're so right! — cambler, Sun 2:02 PM (0/0)
      • Sir, you're mistaken — cambler, Sun 7:35 AM (1/5)
        • No, no, no — kristopher, Sun 7:55 AM (2/4)
          • Thats the point — Anthony 2nd, Sun 5:47 PM (0/0)
          • No? — cambler, Sun 1:37 PM (1/2)
            • What if... — kristopher, Sun 8:20 PM (1/1)
              • Yes, what if... — cambler, Sun 9:00 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Opposition To IOD Fees — pilot5, Sat 5:13 PM (2/2)
  • IN Capitalism, the market determines the price...however you have to start somewhere.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sat 8:51 PM (0/0)
  • This should not be a stumbling block — doc again, Sat 8:51 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN is different from the evaluation team: this is why IOD can get .web! — fabrcop, Sat 5:10 PM (2/6)
  • My understanding, my fear and my hope — saskia, Sat 11:24 PM (1/1)
    • The problem with the staff report... — cambler, Sat 11:35 PM (0/0)
  • Good point — jeffrey, Sat 7:56 PM (1/3)
    • A book? — cambler, Sat 11:03 PM (1/2)
      • A film? — Anthony 2nd, Sun 6:00 PM (1/1)
        • yes, a film — sunshine, Sun 7:49 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Is this true? — Anthony 2nd, Sat 3:51 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Well what did you expect? — Anthony 2nd, Sat 3:37 PM (1/1)
  • Dear ICANN Board — stuart, Sat 4:50 PM (0/0)

  ---

• KIDS.KIDS.KIDS  -  The EValuation Team is making Policy — pagehowe, Sat 3:30 PM (1/3)
  • For Profit vs Nonprofit — Watchdog, Sat 6:56 PM (1/2)
    • A judgement you're not qualified to make — tyrastor, Sat 8:56 PM (1/1)
      • Already retracted — watchdog, Sat 9:38 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN!!! KIDS SHOULD BE GRANTED NOW!! — joehowe, Sat 3:28 PM (5/6)
  • Here's what not to do and a suggestion. — jeffrey, Sun 5:43 AM (0/0)
  • You should have employed an ICANN board member for your team — doc again, Sat 8:55 PM (0/0)
  • Think about this — Watchdog, Sat 7:04 PM (1/1)
    • .Kids Content Policy Board — joehowe, Sat 10:51 PM (0/0)
  • H e r e !  H e r e !  ^^^^ I C A N N ^^^^ Are You Listening ? — AdvantaTel, Sat 4:16 PM (0/0)
  • Come On! — Tom L., Sat 4:05 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Appeal to the ICANN board members — saskia, Sat 12:31 AM (2/5)
  • Stop appealing. — Ucant, Sat 5:25 PM (1/1)
    • The Cartel — jeffrey, Sat 7:41 PM (0/0)
  • Completing this appeal... — fabrcop, Sat 2:41 PM (1/2)
    • I am happy to hear that ICANN Staff and the Evaluation Team say no to IODesign — wiredz, Sun 9:45 AM (1/1)
      • No reply from me — cambler, Sun 9:19 PM (0/0)

  ---

• 20,000 of us need an answer — robuk, Sat 10:59 AM (1/4)
  • Not sure about this — fabrcop, Sat 2:35 PM (1/3)
    • Response To "Not Sure About This" ... ICANN Controls IOD's Financial Picture — pilot5, Sat 3:38 PM (2/2)
      • ICANN — kristopher, Sun 10:26 PM (0/0)
      • good point — doc again, Sat 9:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• it's hard to find in icann's site - why some applications are refused? — mahara, Sat 9:00 AM (1/2)
  • summaries of applications — Alexander Svensson, Sat 10:52 AM (1/1)
    • no way, are you sure it's the right link? — mahara, Sat 6:44 PM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids domain — mahara, Sat 8:55 AM (2/4)
  • But not a for profit company — Watchdog, Sat 7:16 PM (1/2)
    • Our concern for kids — tyrastor, Sat 9:00 PM (1/1)
      • As I said above — watchdog, Sat 9:47 PM (0/0)
  • Y e s !  V e r y,  V e r y   I m p o r t a n t ! .... ICANN ! ! ! .... Are You Listening? — AdvantaTel, Sat 2:53 PM (0/0)

  ---

• It's time for 100's if not thousands more TLD's than these few, time to get with it. — marks, Sat 8:15 AM (1/1)
  • I disagree on number but agree on TLD types like .KIDS and .XXX — AdvantaTel, Sat 1:28 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN board members other than Stubbs — jeffrey, Sat 7:24 AM (1/1)
  • what ICANN meant by "promote competition" — sunshine, Sat 1:18 PM (0/0)

  ---

• We don't need another Clinton! — multilinks, Sat 6:40 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Why can't ICANN accept ....... — kend, Sat 6:19 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN acknowledges "proof of concept " importance - or do they? — jeffrey, Sat 6:06 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN's >>> Severe Case Of Foot In Mouth Disease ! — AdvantaTel, Sat 4:59 AM (1/1)
  • ICANN ... Foot In Mouth Disease — pilot5, Sat 12:22 AM (0/0)

  ---

• RE: .web/IOD: We'll be heard- One way or another — nib, Sat 4:31 AM (1/1)
  • agreed — sunshine, Sat 4:58 AM (0/0)

  ---

• And since ICANN took issue with IOD's pricing — sunshine, Sat 4:25 AM (1/3)
  • hello again? — jarvis, Sat 4:31 AM (2/2)
    • Mr. Jarvis is Incorrect — cambler, Sat 4:42 AM (0/0)
    • let's cover one point you missed though... — sstallings, Sat 4:36 AM (0/0)

  ---

• And yet another excerpt from Afilias' application — sunshine, Sat 4:06 AM (1/3)
  • hello? — jarvis, Sat 4:19 AM (1/2)
    • Mr. Jarvis is correct — cambler, Sat 4:35 AM (1/1)
      • And you're right, but... — sunshine, Sat 4:47 AM (0/0)

  ---

• another excerpt from Afilias' application regarding competition — sunshine, Sat 3:50 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Ken Stubbs ICQ Number ..... — kjohar, Sat 3:37 AM (1/4)
  • a true IOD supporter — jarvis, Sat 4:26 AM (1/3)
    • Explain.. — netfxmedia, Sat 4:33 AM (1/2)
      • excuse me? — jarvis, Sat 4:42 AM (1/1)
        • I AGREE BUT! Aren't You "The Pot Calling The Kettle Black?" — AdvantaTel, Sat 1:50 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Afilias must be disqualified immediately because... — sunshine, Sat 3:28 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN and staff did well — lapointe, Sat 3:00 AM (2/3)
  • IOD's pricing — cambler, Sat 3:05 AM (0/0)
  • oh no they didn't — sunshine, Sat 3:04 AM (1/1)
    • This point is subjective — lapointe, Sat 3:32 AM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD Wins Election! — smart, Sat 2:36 AM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD is Technically Sufficient — smart, Sat 2:33 AM (1/7)
  • What multilingual registrations prove — jarvis, Sat 4:14 AM (2/6)
    • Actually... — cambler, Sat 4:57 AM (0/0)
    • I don't believe... — sstallings, Sat 4:30 AM (2/4)
      • Handle The Demand ... — pilot5, Sat 3:16 PM (0/0)
      • thank you — jarvis, Sat 4:58 AM (2/2)
        • Competition?! — cambler, Sat 5:06 AM (0/0)
        • OK... disagree this time LOL — sstallings, Sat 5:05 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN = It's a Correct Application Nepotism-pal NSI ! — sstallings, Sat 2:06 AM (1/3)
  • Justice... — prashanti, Sat 2:35 AM (1/2)
    • Wish it were that easy... — sstallings, Sat 2:39 AM (1/1)
      • These people might be interested.... — prashanti, Sat 2:54 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Bait and Switch! .web to Neustar! .site .info to afilias! — first1, Sat 1:59 AM (1/1)
  • NeuStar has stated that it is the sole applicant for the .web proposal. — first1, Sat 2:24 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .BIZ  - It still exists, is live, has registrants and ICANN is still considering allowing collisions — jandl, Sat 1:26 AM (0/0)

  ---

• New court orders ICANN to make changes — clickhumanrights, Sat 1:18 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids TLD should be run by a Nonprofit Entity! — Watchdog, Sat 1:18 AM (6/18)
  • .Kids Content Policy Board — joehowe, Sat 3:08 PM (1/1)
    • Your offer is welcome — Watchdog, Sat 7:29 PM (0/0)
  • Not a bad idea — Neo, Sat 1:02 PM (1/1)
    • Thank you — watchdog, Sat 8:56 PM (0/0)
  • Where is your application? — mystwoman, Sat 12:12 AM (1/1)
    • Typical Response — watchdog, Sat 9:01 PM (0/0)
  • You Have My Complete Endorsement — addideas, Sat 3:36 AM (1/1)
    • Thanks Darren! — Watchdog, Sat 4:01 AM (0/0)
  • I Agree ! — AdvantaTel, Sat 1:26 AM (1/1)
    • Thank you AdvantaTel — Watchdog, Sat 1:28 AM (0/0)
  • We need your support for Nonprofit .kids TLD! — Watchdog, Sat 1:26 AM (2/7)
    • AGREE AND SUPPORT 100% — Neo, Sat 1:07 PM (1/1)
      • Thank you for your kind response — watchdog, Sat 9:03 PM (0/0)
    • Not Sure I Agree... — prashanti, Sat 1:46 AM (1/4)
      • Has that been your experience? — Watchdog, Sat 3:54 AM (2/3)
        • There are corporations and corporations — kschneyer, Sun 8:55 PM (0/0)
        • Fortunate... — prashanti, Sat 5:49 AM (1/1)
          • I have been pleasantly surprised already — watchdog, Sat 9:06 PM (0/0)

  ---

• If Afilias is granted .web ..... — kjohar, Sat 1:01 AM (1/1)
  • Afilias can do what they like. — Anthony 2nd, Sat 4:35 PM (0/0)

  ---

• A Cool Mind & Civil Tongue... — prashanti, Sat 12:53 AM (0/0)

  ---

• I Am An IODesign Supporter And Registrant ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, Sat 12:53 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Duplicate .com register — jweb, Sat 12:49 AM (0/0)

  ---

• I urge every IOD supporter to post a meassage on this forum — veronica, Sat 12:45 AM (2/2)
  • IOD support — HarryA, Sun 6:14 PM (0/0)
  • Lets go further. — netfxmedia, Sat 12:50 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Can we not attempt to create more publicity of this outright conspiracy underway? — kjohar, Sat 12:44 AM (2/2)
  • Won't happen... — sstallings, Sat 2:13 AM (0/0)
  • Press Releases — prashanti, Sat 12:59 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ADDING new TLD discussion to ICANN meeting — sunshine, Sat 12:44 AM (2/2)
  • We'll be heard-- one way or another — nib, Sat 4:10 AM (0/0)
  • I am willing to sign — netfxmedia, Sat 12:45 AM (0/0)

  ---

• New gTLDs, Enhancement of Diversity Criteria — deeba, Sat 12:39 AM (0/0)

  ---

• H E L L O ! ! ! ....ICANN..... Approve ".KIDS" P L E A S E ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, Sat 12:32 AM (1/1)
  • Amen! — Watchdog, Sat 4:03 AM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD Supporters:I think it's only a matter of time before we file a lawsuit against ICANN..... — kjohar, Sat 12:17 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Applicants should be given the oppertunity to make comments to the staff report — saskia, Fri 11:03 PM (1/8)
  • byebye IOD! — noIODear, Fri 11:35 PM (4/7)
    • Am I wrong ????? — kend, Sat 6:01 AM (0/0)
    • Eugene?  Is that you? — lapointe, Sat 3:36 AM (0/0)
    • You Hide Yourself Ergo You Are A.... — AdvantaTel, Fri 11:45 PM (1/3)
      • and today's looser is.......... — noIODear, Fri 11:52 PM (2/2)
        • Grow up — netfxmedia, Sat 12:17 AM (0/0)
        • Debts! How About Investment In A Well Run Organization! >>> IoDesign — AdvantaTel, Sat 12:15 AM (0/0)
    • Well... — saskia, Fri 11:41 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Report discrepancies — ville, Fri 10:54 PM (0/0)

  ---

• The only FAIR solution! Let the Internet Folks vote!! — Rebeka, Fri 10:48 PM (4/7)
  • ICANN intends to defend.... — first1, Sat 12:55 AM (0/0)
  • you wish! — noIODear, Fri 11:46 PM (2/2)
    • AGAIN — sunshine, Sat 12:35 AM (0/0)
    • reply — kjohar, Sat 12:20 AM (0/0)
  • I Agree — VikashPatel, Fri 11:04 PM (0/0)
  • Good idea! — ville, Fri 10:56 PM (1/1)
    • Don't hold your breath waiting... — joinin, Fri 11:10 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN risks antitrust and antidiscrimination action — prashanti, Fri 10:28 PM (1/4)
  • Yes, .WEB To IOD, .INFO To Afilias — pilot5, Fri 10:49 PM (2/3)
    • Yes, .WEB to IOD — HarryA, Sun 6:17 PM (0/0)
    • ... and .site to Neustar. This is the perfect choice for ICANN! — fabrcop, Sat 2:17 PM (1/1)
      • .WEB to IOD, .INFO to Afilias, ... Too Late For Neustar, They Blew It — pilot5, Sat 3:42 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Image Online Design Response — cambler, Fri 10:11 PM (4/23)
  • Recommendation? — jweb, Sat 2:36 AM (0/0)
  • ICANN Please provide a response in this forum! You have been silent! — first1, Fri 11:18 PM (0/0)
  • This is a public forum and just like you we are all free to publish our views — GoodriddanceIOD!!!, Fri 11:10 PM (3/4)
    • Answers — cambler, Fri 11:55 PM (1/1)
      • such a shame — noIODear, Sat 12:02 AM (0/0)
    • Get it right — sunshine, Fri 11:50 PM (0/0)
    • Flawed arguments from goodrid..... — joinin, Fri 11:21 PM (0/0)
  • Image Online Design financials — atibson, Fri 10:54 PM (5/15)
    • Your conclusions are completely unsubstantiated — lewco, Sat 5:39 AM (0/0)
    • thank you — jarvis, Sat 4:22 AM (2/6)
      • Credibility? — cambler, Sat 5:10 AM (1/4)
        • have you even read the ICANN report? — jarvis, Sat 5:28 AM (2/3)
          • Moon.TM - Love it ! — cyber-cynic, Sat 6:43 AM (0/0)
          • Reply... — cambler, Sat 6:01 AM (1/1)
            • TRUE Response — vdfman, Sat 2:28 PM (0/0)
      • Allen Greenspan's assistant here... — sstallings, Sat 4:39 AM (0/0)
    • Other Business Plans that looked great: — vdfman, Sat 3:38 AM (1/1)
      • ^^^.... ICANN ! ! ! .... Are You Listening? ^^^ — AdvantaTel, Sat 4:44 PM (0/0)
    • Where does experience fit into your calculations? — prashanti, Fri 11:41 PM (0/0)
    • Can you  be more specific? — cambler, Fri 11:05 PM (1/3)
      • get real — noIODear, Fri 11:57 PM (1/2)
        • Drumming? — World Thoughts, Sat 12:05 AM (1/1)
          • no drumming here — sunshine, Sat 1:13 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Bye Bye Chris Ambler Bye Bye Marc Brittan — GoodriddanceIOD!!!, Fri 9:54 PM (7/9)
  • Silly anonymous post: these are IOD opponents — fabrcop, Sat 2:03 PM (0/0)
  • Truth be told — bartender, Fri 11:35 PM (1/1)
    • Keith, you. . . — Sanity, Sat 1:59 AM (0/0)
  • Keith — sanity, Fri 10:54 PM (0/0)
  • Now now keith, this is poor even for you — joinin, Fri 10:15 PM (1/1)
    • Re: — netfxmedia, Fri 10:23 PM (0/0)
  • As expected — cambler, Fri 10:13 PM (0/0)
  • re — bartender, Fri 10:09 PM (0/0)
  • get off the boards — netfxmedia, Fri 9:59 PM (0/0)

  ---

• I CALL UPON ALL IOD SUPPORTERS TO. . . — World Thoughts, Fri 9:39 PM (1/8)
  • My analysis — netfxmedia, Fri 9:50 PM (2/7)
    • I agree because.... — sunshine, Sat 12:02 AM (0/0)
    • Re: My analysis — nike, Fri 10:01 PM (1/5)
      • hmmm. — netfxmedia, Fri 10:05 PM (1/4)
        • Re: hmmm. — nike, Fri 10:47 PM (3/3)
          • uh huh... — dtan, Sat 8:23 AM (0/0)
          • well... — sunshine, Sat 12:08 AM (0/0)
          • Really? — cambler, Fri 10:54 PM (0/0)

  ---

• $$$$$$$$$$$ Independent Decisions? How Independent is ICANN? $$$$$$$$$$$$ — Rebeka, Fri 9:36 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Reversed logic — fabrcop, Fri 9:28 PM (2/4)
  • Indeed — saskia, Fri 11:47 PM (0/0)
  • By the way, don't you worry if Afilias has grown? — fabrcop, Fri 9:34 PM (1/2)
    • GREAT POINT!!!!!!!! — lewco, Fri 9:38 PM (1/1)
      • what have afilias done.... — joinin, Sat 12:19 AM (0/0)

  ---

• Bias & Nepotism — jeffrey, Fri 9:22 PM (1/1)
  • GOOD reason for no problems with Aflilias application............ — lewco, Fri 9:35 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ANOTHER direct question to ICANN — sunshine, Fri 9:19 PM (2/2)
  • ICANN don't want to be "open" — saskia, Fri 11:36 PM (0/0)
  • sadly but true — netfxmedia, Fri 10:07 PM (0/0)

  ---

• A sad day — bartender, Fri 9:08 PM (2/2)
  • However, wait for the final decision — fabrcop, Fri 9:59 PM (0/0)
  • yes, very sad — sunshine, Fri 9:13 PM (0/0)

  ---

• A DIRECT QUESTION FOR ICANN — lewco, Fri 9:03 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Question to Applicants — dansokol, Fri 8:53 PM (3/4)
  • APPLICANTS - READ MR. SOKOL'S POST-ICANN CON GAME — aaaswt, Sat 3:47 PM (0/0)
  • Is ICANN trying to be the Alan Greenspan of the web? — mystwoman, Sat 12:31 AM (0/0)
  • SCAM from the start? — first1, Sat 1:09 AM (1/1)
    • I Hate to say this — kend, Sat 6:41 AM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANNS BOARD WILL BE REMEMBERED AS MOST CORRUPT EVER — lewco, Fri 8:35 PM (3/5)
  • Wait for the final decision: I am still confident in a fair choice — fabrcop, Fri 9:07 PM (1/1)
    • Me to, but... — saskia, Fri 11:22 PM (0/0)
  • ICANN is a guanxi vendor — Kirk Knight, Fri 9:01 PM (1/1)
    • ICANN is not narrow-minded; they are. . . — World Thoughts, Fri 9:18 PM (0/0)
  • Did you notice that too? — sunshine, Fri 8:44 PM (0/0)

  ---

• New TLD Applicant Expo Added to Pressing Issues II Conference — bedelman, Fri 8:23 PM (1/1)
  • How come 3 students do a more objective job than ICANN and Co? — huguesdb, Sun 6:46 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Notice that only IOD has "demonstrated" real facts! [Footnote 2] — fabrcop, Fri 7:54 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Full disclosure by posters — nike, Fri 7:13 PM (3/4)
  • I am... — sstallings, Sat 12:50 AM (0/0)
  • I am.. — netfxmedia, Fri 10:12 PM (0/0)
  • supportive of the most deserving — sunshine, Fri 7:32 PM (1/1)
    • it's not about money, it's about communication — Kirk Knight, Fri 8:55 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Follow your rules ICANN — jmgraham, Fri 6:47 PM (0/0)

  ---

• more ICANN evaluation — stuart, Fri 6:29 PM (1/6)
  • Re: more ICANN evaluation — nike, Fri 7:23 PM (1/5)
    • Technical capabilities — cambler, Fri 7:52 PM (2/4)
      • Applicants should be given the oppertunity to make comments to the staff report — saskia, Fri 11:03 PM (1/1)
        • Re: Applicants should be given the oppertunity to make comments to the staff report — nike, Fri 11:21 PM (0/0)
      • Re: Technical capabilities — nike, Fri 10:16 PM (1/1)
        • Incorrect — cambler, Fri 10:33 PM (0/0)

  ---

• All Pre-registrations of .Web should Stand — VikashPatel, Fri 6:28 PM (4/16)
  • R-E-G-I-S-T-E-R-A-T-I-O-N-S — netfxmedia, Fri 9:52 PM (1/2)
    • Re: R-E-G-I-S-T-E-R-A-T-I-O-N-S — nike, Fri 11:13 PM (1/1)
      • This is all getting old — sanity, Fri 11:18 PM (0/0)
  • Re: All Pre-registrations of .Web should Stand — nike, Fri 7:08 PM (5/8)
    • More Rhetorical Prose From An Afilias Partner! — AdvantaTel, Sat 1:22 AM (0/0)
    • Legality is the key word — VikashPatel, Fri 10:02 PM (1/1)
      • Re: Legality is the key word — nike, Fri 11:11 PM (0/0)
    • Canadas Registrars Commit Fraud? — jeffrey, Fri 7:56 PM (1/1)
      • Re: Canadas Registrars Commit Fraud? — nike, Fri 10:11 PM (0/0)
    • Wrong — World Thoughts, Fri 7:53 PM (1/1)
      • Re: Wrong — nike, Fri 10:09 PM (0/0)
    • not quite — sunshine, Fri 7:35 PM (0/0)
  • RE: All Pre-registrations of .Web should Stand — prarie, Fri 6:55 PM (1/1)
    • Underground? — World Thoughts, Fri 8:05 PM (0/0)
  • IOD's application deserves to be accepted: that's all — fabrcop, Fri 6:44 PM (1/1)
    • I agree. — netfxmedia, Fri 10:27 PM (0/0)

  ---

• 20,000 IOD Registrations Not Enough? — pilot5, Fri 6:21 PM (1/1)
  • Very Good Insight! " Pilot5 " — AdvantaTel, Sat 4:34 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Real versus artificial competition. — jeffrey, Fri 6:19 PM (0/0)

  ---

• IOD's .web registry is the only functioning one - the other ones are theory! — fabrcop, Fri 6:11 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Support for the policies of Affinity/bizTRAC Application — NigelHicksonCBI, Fri 6:04 PM (0/0)

  ---

• why is that ? — open mind, Fri 5:28 PM (1/2)
  • IOD will use a competetive price — saskia, Fri 7:10 PM (1/1)
    • Competition will give the right price — saskia, Fri 7:39 PM (0/0)

  ---

• twisted logic for whose purpose? — stuart, Fri 5:16 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Staff Report Illustrates ICANN Oblivious To Growth Of Small Business — pilot5, Fri 5:07 PM (2/2)
  • Very Well Said! — AdvantaTel, Sat 2:24 PM (0/0)
  • Well said! — dansokol, Fri 7:16 PM (0/0)

  ---

• IODs ability to grow — saskia, Fri 4:22 PM (2/2)
  • Growth in other businesses — cambler, Fri 8:40 PM (0/0)
  • IOD's ability to grow — sunshine, Fri 4:32 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Staff Report - IOD — pilot5, Fri 4:01 PM (2/7)
  • Re: Staff Report — nike, Fri 7:33 PM (4/5)
    • Reply — World Thoughts, Fri 9:06 PM (0/0)
    • ICANN criticizes IOD for having too many registry operators! — jeffrey, Fri 8:19 PM (0/0)
    • Staff Report, To John D. Hynes — pilot5, Fri 8:05 PM (1/1)
      • Re: Staff Report, To John D. Hynes — nike, Fri 11:06 PM (0/0)
    • and NSI? — sunshine, Fri 7:45 PM (0/0)
  • Staff Report - IOD — uki, Fri 4:27 PM (0/0)

  ---

• ICANN will not get away with this — sunshine, Fri 3:58 PM (2/3)
  • ... there will be repercussions ... — dansokol, Fri 7:22 PM (0/0)
  • However, I can't believe that ICANN wants to create a big SCANDAL — fabrcop, Fri 6:23 PM (1/1)
    • Read it again — sunshine, Fri 7:17 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Specific Content Restriction Criteria — PageHowe, Fri 3:57 PM (0/0)

  ---

• questions and concerns to IOD and ICANN — open mind, Fri 3:01 PM (2/2)
  • Not sole registrar — cambler, Fri 8:58 PM (0/0)
  • Comment on your first thought — saskia, Fri 3:57 PM (0/0)

  ---

• Bizarre logic for .web — joinin, Fri 1:27 PM (1/5)
  • Bizarre logic indeed — saskia, Fri 2:15 PM (1/4)
    • ICANN's logic — sunshine, Fri 4:05 PM (1/3)
      • Bizarre logic for .web — davis, Fri 4:25 PM (2/2)
        • The point — cambler, Fri 9:27 PM (0/0)
        • You are thinking in tech terms — joinin, Fri 7:45 PM (0/0)

  ---

• To ICANN : .WEB - Where's the competition? — dtan, Fri 1:18 PM (4/11)
  • .com monopoly goes to .web! — first1, Fri 5:36 PM (1/1)
    • IOD still deserves .web — VikashPatel, Fri 6:00 PM (0/0)
  • one after the other — open mind, Fri 1:55 PM (2/2)
    • revision — open mind, Fri 7:46 PM (0/0)
    • Yes, please comment on the report only — saskia, Fri 2:21 PM (0/0)
  • Afilias — joinin, Fri 1:33 PM (1/1)
    • Agreed — sunshine, Fri 6:21 PM (0/0)
  • ICANN, give all new TLDs to NSI... — cello, Fri 1:33 PM (3/3)
    • However, I can't believe that ICANN wants to create a big SCANDAL — fabrcop, Fri 6:36 PM (0/0)
    • Was this just a way for icann to make money — first1, Fri 5:54 PM (0/0)
    • that appears to be their plan — joinin, Fri 1:34 PM (0/0)

  ---

• http://icannt.com/ — notsure, Fri 1:10 PM (1/2)
  • My thought — netfxmedia, Fri 9:56 PM (1/1)
    • just hire arthur anderson, clearly they have the inside track — mystwoman, Sat 12:10 AM (0/0)

  ---

• .kids tld not decided? — mystwoman, Fri 1:00 PM (0/0)

  ---

• [.web] ICANN, you're missing the point — saskia, Fri 12:55 AM (1/1)
  • Re: — netfxmedia, Fri 10:30 PM (0/0)

  ---