Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: ron10000
Date/Time: Sat, October 14, 2000 at 5:10 PM GMT
Browser: Netscape Communicator V4.07 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: .SEX, .XXX, .KIDS TLDs Restrict Freedom of Speech

Message:
 

 
First the problems with the proposed .SEX & .XXX TLDs:

The proposed TLDs .SEX and .XXX seem well intentioned as a
way of partitioning off adult oriented materials from minors, etc.

But how does one exactly define adult oriented materials?
-especially considering the internet is an international medium.
What is considered adult oriented here in the United States isn't
elsewhere and vice-versa.

And what happens when ICANN or whoever decides to go the
next step and restricts adult oriented materials to *only* certain
TLDs - for example .SEX and .XXX only.

And how would such content restrictions be enforced?

In the end TLDs such as .SEX and .XXX will probably result in
ICANN dictating content too.

In regards to problems with the proposed .KIDS TLD:

Many of the same points above apply to .KIDS too...

How does one exactly define kid oriented materials? -especially
considering the internet is an international medium. What is
considered adult oriented here in the United States isn't
elsewhere and vice-versa. For example, nudity in many parts of
the world such as parts of Europe and Japan is not considered
harmful to children. On the other hand, violence aimed at children
is widely tolerated in the United States, but not content containing
nudity.

And how would such content restrictions be enforced?

And as I said above, in the end TLDs such as .KIDS will probably
result in ICANN dictating content too.

TLDs should be used to better categorize content, but not to
restrict it. While .SEX, .XXX, and .KIDS TLDs are well intentioned,
all three of these TLDs are all primarily intended to *restrict*
content as opposed to merely categorizing it. It's very important
to keep this distinction in mind when considering new .TLDs.

Bottom line is that TLDs should be for categorizing content, not
restricting content which is what the proposed .SEX, .XXX, and
.KIDS TLDs would do and thus they should *not* be added.

Ron Bennett
bennett@wyomissing.com

 


Message Thread: