Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Date/Time: Sat, November 4, 2000 at 1:43 AM GMT (Sat, November 4, 2000 at 2:43 AM CET)
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: Limitation needed


What ever the result of this discussions will be: I strongly believe that limitation of TLDs is needed. There might be good reasons to supply someting for unions and for kids, some for continents or political units (eu or arab), but do not believe that it will make any sense to offer TLDs to every branch in business.
Instead of having the numbers of TLDs increased as wanted by the most, it might make sense to offer a new system of TLDs in the near future. Putting e.g. the location in front of the URL (e.g. could bring us further. We than would have the following TLDs build

(location1) (location2) (Name) (Kind)
www / de / communards / org

Under this regards we just need to seperate the kind newly. What kind of users do we have? I just see the following

gov - governmental
org - non gov. organisation
net - non gov. organisation / networks
com - commercial
biz - sales
kid - suitable for childern
sex - adult pages
edu - education
uni - unions
rel - religious

Add some new regions

eu - Europe
as - Asia
af - Africa
nam - North Amerika (could be Ya for Yankee)
sam - South America (could be Ma for Macho)

With this or simmilar, I believe a target in the www can still be traced.


Message Thread:

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy