Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
PCIA |
Date/Time: |
Thu, November 2, 2000 at 9:19 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 95 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
PCIA Comments on Applications Received by ICANN for Operating New TLDs |
Message: |
|
PCIA Comments on Applications Received By ICANN for Operating New TLDs and Suggestion
for Improving the Process of Protecting Trademark Rights Personal Communications
Industry Association ("PCIA") submits these comments on the applications for new
Top Level Domains ("TLDs") received by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers ("ICANN") and offers a proposal for improving the process of protecting
trademark rights in the new TLDs. PCIA is an international trade association
dedicated to advancing seamless global communications through its strategic marketing,
public policy, expertise, events and educational programs. PCIA members include
a broad base of interdependent mobile convergence players. PCIA is devoted
to the rapid, efficient and cost effective deployment of consumer-driven mobile products
and services around the world. One important factor in securing successful
deployment will be the ease and certainty with which consumers are able to identify
and find the suppliers of relevant products and services. While PCIA was established
to represent the interests of the commercial and private mobile radio service communications
industries and the fixed broadband wireless industry, the association believes that
the best way to protect the interests of consumers and the trademark interests of
its members is to ensure that all trademark owners have adequate trademark protection
in any new unrestricted TLD approved by ICANN. On July 16, 2000, ICANN announced
its intention to accept applications from organizations seeking to sponsor or operate
new TLDs. While ICANN did not specify how many, if any, new TLDs would be approved,
it adopted a policy for introduction of new TLDs "in a measured and responsible manner."
ICANN Announcement, July 16, 2000. The exact number of TLDs that will be introduced
will depend on the characters of the proposals received.
In its resolution, ICANN
stressed the importance of protecting intellectual property rights in connection
with the operation of any new TLDs. Specifically, in its applications forms,
ICANN asked each applicant to describe the measures that will be taken "to discourage
registration of domain names that infringe intellectual property rights," whether
there will be "pre-screening for potentially infringing registration," and if so,
"how will the pre-screening be performed?" The resolution appears to contemplate
that existing procedures would be the starting point, not the finish line, for protecting
property rights of trademark holders. During the application period from September
5, 2000, to October 2, 2000, ICANN received 44 applications from organizations wishing
to operate as a registry for new TLDs. PCIA has reviewed these applications
and the approaches they take to protect intellectual property rights. This
review has enabled PCIA to formulate a proposal for a practical and effective standard
approach to the challenges likely to be faced by trademark owners if new TLDs are
created. We offer this proposed solution in these comments. The Problem for
Trademark Owners The widespread commercial use of the Internet has been beneficial
to both businesses and consumers throughout the world. It has also brought
about significant challenges for trademark owners who have found third parties seeking
to capitalize on their goodwill by registering and using domain names based on the
owners’ trademarks. As a result, trademark owners have been forced to expend
extensive resources and time fighting constant battles to protect their intellectual
property rights. These battles must be fought not only against willful infringers,
but also against parties whose use of a domain name, while perhaps done without willful
intent, nevertheless conflicts with the trademark owner’s rights. The adoption
of new TLDs threatens to exacerbate this problem. Simply put, more TLDs offer
more opportunities for third parties to adopt domain names that interfere with trademark
rights and threaten to confuse the public. At the same time, more TLDs will
increase the effort and resources that trademark owners will need to invest to protect
their rights. The present process by which domain names are registered forces
trademark owners to challenge an infringing domain name only after a registration
has been granted and, in many cases, after the registrant has commenced use of the
offending domain name. In these circumstances, third party domain name registrants
often feel they have acquired a vested interest in the domain name, despite pre-existing
trademark rights. Thus, they are more likely to fight legitimate trademark
claims. The better approach is to protect trademark rights before conflicting
domain names are registered. PCIA believes that, as ICANN adopts new unrestricted
TLDs, it must address this problem. With this submission, PCIA hopes to accomplish
the following: · Offer a possible solution to the problems facing trademark owners
in new unrestricted TLDs; and · Open a dialog on the question of how best
to provide protection for trademark owners which, in turn, can assist ICANN in accomplishing
its goal of providing appropriate protection for intellectual property rights in
new unrestricted TLDs. Proposed Model for Protection of Intellectual Property in
new TLDs Since January 1, 2000, the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
("UDRP") adopted by ICANN has been a useful tool for trademark owners to obtain or
cancel domain name registrations where there have been abusive domain name registrations
in .com, .net and .org. As effective as UDRP has been in providing relief for
trademark owners, however, it has been an entirely post hoc remedy, with all the
attendant problems of tracking down and dealing with cybersquatters and others who
have violated intellectual property rights. PCIA believes that the UDRP process
(or a similar one) can and should be expanded to provide a pre-registration dispute
resolution mechanism in order to prevent potential intellectual property violations
before they occur. PCIA recommends two basic procedures for the early resolution
of trademark issues and for the protection of trademark rights. First, each
new TLD should be subject to a "Sunrise Period," during which the owners of registered
trademarks are allowed to register their trademarks as domain names. Second,
domain name registration requests should be published before they are registered,
to permit pre-registration challenges. 1. Sunrise Period PCIA proposes establishment
of an initial Sunrise Period (of not less than 3 or more than 6 months), during which
the owner of any national trademark or service mark registration, issued prior to
July 16, 2000, will be eligible to register a domain name in the new TLD identical
to the textual elements of its trademark.(1) In addition, provision should
be made for anyone who has filed a trademark application prior to July 16, 2000 to
secure applicable domain names during the Sunrise Period if such person pays an appropriate
fee to reserve the proposed domain name until the trademark registration is issued.
Owners of marks that incorporate designs or stylization would be entitled to register
domain names identical to the textual portion of the marks. PCIA expects that during
the Sunrise Period there will be instances in which the owners of identical trademarks
will seek to register the same mark as a domain name. In these instances, we
propose that all such owners of identical trademarks be issued the same domain name
registration (i.e., Apex.new TLD), and that the domain be used for a portal site
that identifies all of the owners of the identical marks. Information would
be provided in the portal that will enable consumers to click onto the company website
in which they are interested. This portal proposal would avoid the issuance
of a domain name on a first-come, first-served basis, which has led to controversy
and conflict in the .com, .net and .org domains. PCIA believes that it is unfair
to owners of registered trademarks to deprive them of the opportunity to have their
registered trademarks be used as their as domain name. Any trademark owner participating
in the proposed portal, of course, would remain free to bring suit against any other
participant in the portal if the first owner believes that another portal participant
was violating the trademark laws of the first trademark owner’s country. Hypothetically,
for example, if company A has a registered trademark for Apex in the U.S. in the
financial affairs class and company B has the same mark registered in South Africa
in the agricultural class, company A would remain free to sue company B under the
trademark laws of the U.S. if company B began to offer financial services under the
Apex domain name. Similarly, if company A has branch operations with trademark
rights in other countries, company A would be free to sue company B in those countries
as well. In general, it is important to emphasize that nothing in this proposal
is intended to supersede or interfere with national trademark laws. Following the
close of the Sunrise Period, PCIA proposes that a Challenge Period be established
during which third parties may challenge Sunrise registration requests on the ground
that the registrant did not meet the requirements for Sunrise registration (e.g.,
the text portion of the trademark owner’s trademark registration was not identical
to the registered domain name or the trademark registration was applied for after
July 16, 2000). Registries granted the right to administer the new TLDs should
be required to set up dispute resolution procedures to decide these challenges promptly
and to provide appropriate relief, including rejecting the challenge or awarding
the domain name to the successful challenger if the latter owns a trademark registration
in the identical mark. 2. Public Registration In the New TLD After the close
of the Sunrise and Challenge Periods, new TLDs would be open to the general public
for registration of domain names on a first-come, first-served basis. In order
to provide more effective trademark protection, PCIA proposes that the existing UDRP
procedures be applied but that they be modified to permit challenges on a pre-registration
basis. A reasonable Challenge Period (we suggest not less than 30 days or more
than 60 days) would be established for every registration request. The new
TLD registry would be required promptly to post registration requests on a consistent
and frequent basis (e.g., daily or weekly), and all relevant information concerning
the applicant must be available on a publicly accessible data base. A challenger
then would have 30 (or 60) days to challenge the registration request utilizing a
modified UDRP procedure. In order to make its case, a challenger first would
need to show a protectable trademark interest in the requested domain name, i.e.,
that is it is using the mark and that the mark is distinctive. Second, again
in accordance with the existing UDRP process, the challenger would then need to establish
that its mark is identical or confusingly similar to the domain name. As the
UDRP decisions have confirmed, this "confusingly similar" requirement is confined
to a side-by-side comparison of the domain name and the mark without any necessity
of proving likelihood of confusion (which would involve whether the goods or services
on which the challenger’s mark and domain name are used are similar, whether there
are similar third party marks, etc.). Third, since this would be a pre-registration
procedure, the proposed modification of the existing UDRP process would eliminate
the requirement that the challenger prove that the domain name had been registered
and was being used in bad faith. As a practical matter, the elimination of
"bad faith registration and use" will not constitute a significant change since the
cases decided by UDRP panels suggest that a domain name that essentially copies another’s
mark will be ordered transferred to the challenger unless the registrant can establish
a legitimate reason for using the name.(2) In any event, we propose adding
good faith plans to use the domain name as a defense to a challenge. The defenses
available to a domain name applicant under the proposal would be the same as under
the existing UDRP process: (1) that the challenger’s mark is not protectable;
(2) that the proposed domain name is not confusingly similar; (3) that the domain
name applicant is proposing to make a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the
domain name; (4) that the applicant commonly has been known by the domain name; or
(5) that, before notice of the challenge, the applicant used or had made demonstrable
preparations to use the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods
and services or had good faith plans to use the domain name in connection with a
bona fide offering of goods or services. Once the Challenge Period has expired
or the domain name applicant has defeated the challenge, the domain name would be
registered. Thereafter, the existing UDRP process would be in effect. A
Review of Applications Received By ICANN A number of applications submitted to
ICANN include trademark provisions which are beneficial to trademark owners in protecting
their intellectual property. However, none of the applications for an unrestricted
TLD provide for pre-registration dispute resolution for all domain name applications
(during the Sunrise Period and thereafter during public registration) as proposed
by PCIA. Further, while some applications provide for a Sunrise Period, none
of these provide appropriate protection for intellectual property. For example,
one of the applications includes a Sunrise Period for owners of trademarks to register
domain names identical to their trademarks, but only on a first-come, first-served
basis. As set forth above, PCIA believes that it is unfair to owners of registered
trademarks to deprive them of the opportunity of having their trademarks also registered
as domain names. Another application includes a similar Sunrise provision for registering
trademarks as domain names but then resolves any conflict between the owners of identical
trademarks by means of an auction, with the domain name awarded to the highest bidder.
PCIA has proposed a portal arrangement to resolve such a conflict, rather than a
winner takes all auction, in the belief that a trademark owner who has spent substantial
time and money in establishing a protectable trademark should not be required to
expend additional money to obtain the trademark as a domain name. Other proposals
for protecting trademark owners require that an affidavit be filed with the new registry
to the effect that an international trademark search has been conducted and no conflict
was found with any registered trademark. Such a search requirement would provide
maximum protection for trademark owners, and would be appropriate in a restricted
TLD whose registrants, in all likelihood, would be firms with the financial means
to conduct a large scale international trademark search. In an unrestricted
TLD, however, such a search requirement would be a financial barrier to a significant
number of potential domain name registrants. For that reason, PCIA has not
included a search requirement in its proposed model for a new unrestricted TLD. Finally,
several applicants have proposed special protections for "famous" trademarks.
While it has made no separate provision for "famous" marks, PCIA believes that its
proposed model provides effective protection for all trademark owners, including
owners of "famous" marks, without the need to undertake the difficult task of determining
what constitutes a "famous" mark. Possible Opportunity for Further Consideration
of Trademark Issues PCIA appreciates the effort that ICANN has undertaken to ensure
that new TLDs protect the rights of trademark owners. The proposals filed by
the applicants offer a number of suggestions. PCIA, in these comments, has
offered a simple, practical process that addresses the concerns of trademark owners.
In light of the importance of the issue, PCIA suggests that ICANN use these comments,
and the others addressing trademark issues, to establish a standard for trademark
protection that applicants will be required to meet before their TLD is approved.
Respectfully submitted, PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION Robert
L. Hoggarth Senior Vice President Government Relations Of Counsel: WILEY,
REIN & FIELDING Hugh Latimer J. Timothy Hobbs Bruce G. Joseph 1776 K
Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. hlatimer@wrf.com Dated: November 2, 2000
(1) July 16, 2000 is the date ICANN announced its new TLD policy. We have
selected this date to avoid giving Sunrise benefits to those who sought bad faith
trademark registrations in anticipation of a possible Sunrise period. (2) See
Telestra Corp. Ltd. v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO D 2000-0003 (registrant had done
nothing but register the name, but bad faith found because the registrant could not
use the name without violating the challenger’s rights under Australian trademark
law).
|
| |
Message Thread:
- General Comments Moderator, October 7 @ 10:40 PM (445/1407)
- This needs to be investigated further and explained in greater detail cgrady, November 6 @ 1:14 AM (0/0)
- The "Individual" Constituency is not represented, but I thought they should!! Gregory W. Krajewski, November 6 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
- Final Thoughts World Thoughts, November 6 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)
- Too broad or too norrow johnD, November 6 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
- Plead to ICANN cgrady, November 6 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)
- Compliments to ICANN! Robert_Jacobson, November 6 @ 12:06 AM (0/0)
- IATA APPLICATION FOR TLD susansammons, November 5 @ 11:48 PM (1/1)
- http://www.joinfoci.org jtrade, November 5 @ 11:43 PM (0/0)
- Questions for applicants re registrars and resellers bfellman, November 5 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
- Comments on New TLDs -- Motion Picture Association TDD, November 5 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)
- COMMERCIAL CONNECT: Questionable ties lapointe, November 5 @ 10:52 PM (0/0)
- ISPCP on new TLDs sastre, November 5 @ 10:23 PM (1/1)
- Comments on Proposals for New Top Level Domains Business Constituency, November 5 @ 10:16 PM (2/2)
- .union sbenedict, November 5 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
- .music TLG 200, November 5 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)
- This Forum: Possibly Nothing More Than A Feel-Good Distraction. Just Paranoia? dcorish, November 5 @ 5:41 PM (0/0)
- NSI DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR NEW GTLDS - READ THE PROOF! friedrich, November 5 @ 5:17 PM (0/0)
- “Spectral Web, Inc.’s Comments Regarding the Choice of New Top-Level Domains and Registries” Spectral Web, Inc., November 5 @ 3:34 PM (1/1)
- Final comments huguesdb, November 5 @ 3:31 PM (0/0)
- Fair Decision Jens72, November 5 @ 3:21 PM (1/1)
- Comment on process jweb, November 5 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness fabrcop, November 5 @ 10:32 AM (1/1)
- Pioneer Preference is most fair method netizen1, November 5 @ 5:47 AM (0/0)
- More ICANN Bribery? jtrade, November 5 @ 4:02 AM (0/0)
- This is what the law says ... friedrich, November 5 @ 12:43 AM (2/2)
- "Dirt in The Domain Name Game" jtrade, November 5 @ 12:21 AM (1/1)
- General opinion fagzal, November 5 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
- Mr. Ken Stubbs will officially represent CORE in ICANNs Public Meeting in Los Angeles! friedrich, November 4 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
- ICANN's vision of TLDs for a new order of cyber civilization R.K. Pillai, November 4 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
- Dissapointing gTLD suggestions... z00ker, November 4 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)
- NO to IOD SayNoToIOD, November 4 @ 7:46 PM (6/6)
- You still have over an hour to admit your own self interest. anthony 2nd, November 5 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)
- You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements fabrcop, November 5 @ 9:59 AM (0/0)
- Sir, you have a right to post here, but not to distort the facts... Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4 @ 11:38 PM (0/0)
- Say YES! to IOD first1, November 4 @ 11:05 PM (0/0)
- We all? How many Jim Smith's are you? (poor guy...) Rebeka, November 4 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
- These allegations are, of course, false cambler, November 4 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)
- Neustar/Melbourne IT/Afilias ... Larry, Moe, & Curly dcorish, November 4 @ 2:39 PM (1/1)
- ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5 Saskia, November 4 @ 1:07 PM (0/0)
- Basic features of the ideal application Rgaetano, November 4 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)
- Afilias Whistle Blower west coast, November 4 @ 8:01 AM (1/1)
- ICANN: You mentioned "fairness" and the "consumer" on your website...I would like to comment... Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4 @ 7:59 AM (1/1)
- Limitation needed martin@communards.de, November 4 @ 1:43 AM (1/1)
- A Sunrise Period is Wrong and Unfair Merlin, November 4 @ 1:36 AM (1/1)
- co-op.com kimc, November 4 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
- General Policy Statement of Registry Selection Frank Mount, November 3 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)
- REGLAND >>> " L I A R S " Never mentioned by ICANN on "Pre-registrations" AdvantaTel, November 3 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
- .SHOP to Name.Space, .WEB to IOD, .INFO to Afilias, .SITE to Neustar netizen1, November 3 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
- American Civil Liberties Union comments on ICANN TLD application process cchiu, November 3 @ 8:40 PM (1/2)
- NeuStar LNP Help Desk chagan, November 3 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)
- YES to .YP - YES TO NEW UNIVERSAL, EFFICIENT and EASY TO USE gTLD's. Juan Pablo Calvo, November 3 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)
- New TLDs John Lewis, November 3 @ 7:50 PM (0/0)
- Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON) fabrcop, November 3 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)
- Strong Vote for .i rgupta, November 3 @ 6:31 PM (0/0)
- Inadequate selection Tim Brown, November 3 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)
- .web doesn't solve the problem tomam, November 3 @ 5:53 PM (2/4)
- Thought Provoking cyber-cynic, November 3 @ 5:12 PM (3/8)
- TLD preregistration SCAM or what davidnrn, November 3 @ 1:58 PM (1/1)
- Scrap NSI entirely. Their human interface is dead. davidnrn, November 3 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5 saskia, November 3 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)
- ICANN Testifying before Congress about many Issues - ON RECORD.... 7/99 Gregory W. Krajewski, November 3 @ 6:33 AM (0/0)
- This whole procedure needs reviewing gt515, November 3 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)
- Avoiding Conflicts of Interest - At last!!! Anthony 2nd, November 3 @ 12:03 AM (1/1)
- Why No TRADEMARK domain???? Jello, November 2 @ 10:35 PM (4/4)
- PCIA Comments on Applications Received by ICANN for Operating New TLDs PCIA, November 2 @ 9:19 PM (1/1)
- .fam TLD beetle, November 2 @ 5:38 PM (0/0)
- CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application! fabrcop, November 2 @ 1:17 PM (0/0)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: why $15? IODskeptic, November 2 @ 9:32 AM (4/11)
- Nov 1 Status Update VikashPatel, November 2 @ 7:10 AM (0/0)
- Neustar/MelbourneIT is Either Lying or it's Application is Flawed! jtrade, November 2 @ 6:26 AM (0/0)
- Grant .WEB to IODesign // Grant .INFO to Afilias worldwide, November 2 @ 6:16 AM (0/0)
- .MAG would be a good TLD for online MAGAZINES DRrandy, November 2 @ 6:09 AM (0/0)
- Nobody will trust a referee siding with .. cello, November 2 @ 5:27 AM (0/0)
- CORE application is good for everyone Ksoussi, November 2 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
- Desiderata for new TLDs mc, November 2 @ 12:24 AM (0/0)
- Support "dot co-op" idi1, November 1 @ 6:26 PM (0/0)
- Numeric domain names Gervas, November 1 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)
- ICANN is Not in the business for TM protection.....It's all about the technical aspects of the DNS Gregory W. Krajewski, November 1 @ 4:31 PM (1/1)
- IPC preliminary evaluation of new TLD applications SJMetalitz, November 1 @ 3:53 PM (5/7)
- GREAT COMPANY ManyStores, November 1 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)
- support .museum CAA, November 1 @ 3:13 PM (0/0)
- GREAT COMPANY ManyStores, November 1 @ 3:07 PM (0/0)
- Moral rights fabrcop, November 1 @ 1:59 PM (0/0)
- NO to IATA/TLD jie, November 1 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)
- What's That Foul Smell? jtrade, November 1 @ 9:41 AM (0/0)
- The perfect choice is: IOD/.web , Afilias/.info , Neustar/.site fabrcop, November 1 @ 9:04 AM (0/0)
- The internet should be a utility mayor, November 1 @ 6:14 AM (0/0)
- Who got it right - in absolute numbers pedro, November 1 @ 4:11 AM (1/1)
- MSNBC poll - who got it right pedro, November 1 @ 3:58 AM (0/0)
- .Web, MelbourneIT/Neustar,ICANN Director Greg Crew and Conflict of Interest? jtrade, November 1 @ 2:17 AM (1/1)
- .WEB to IOD and .SHOP to Name.Space netizen1, October 31 @ 10:42 PM (0/0)
- Better format for this board! ville, October 31 @ 10:15 PM (0/0)
- .health TLD LMS, October 31 @ 9:16 PM (0/0)
- Parallel root server with separate database PHXbird, October 31 @ 9:13 PM (0/0)
- All applications should be returned. If-I-can-why-can't-ICANN., October 31 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)
- support .co-op domain mnfc, October 31 @ 2:54 PM (0/0)
- support for .museum taieve, October 31 @ 8:57 AM (0/0)
- Are we all missing the point? cyber-cynic, October 31 @ 7:22 AM (4/9)
- Almostly can't wait..... herrieta, October 31 @ 5:34 AM (0/0)
- support mumber .tel emily, October 31 @ 4:54 AM (0/0)
- support NUMBER.tel philiptsai, October 31 @ 4:43 AM (0/0)
- New TLDs---->.tel is execellent! philiptsai, October 31 @ 4:23 AM (0/0)
- Cheapest Wins YellowMello, October 31 @ 3:42 AM (1/1)
- Another Law suit? cyber-cynic, October 31 @ 12:05 AM (2/15)
- ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world fabrcop, October 30 @ 9:16 PM (0/0)
- Support .health domain eohtlg, October 30 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
- MAIN CONCERN: commercialization and monopolization gilles, October 30 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)
- Is ICANN pulling a fast one? Anthony 2nd, October 30 @ 11:19 AM (0/0)
- after much research dandb, October 30 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)
- No new generic unrestricted TLDs PLEASE huguesdb, October 29 @ 10:41 PM (3/23)
- Why not ONE dot ALT TLD? itsjpr, October 29 @ 7:25 PM (1/1)
- What do you think? VikashPatel, October 29 @ 3:35 PM (0/0)
- Top Domain Name Holders Merlin, October 29 @ 6:34 AM (1/1)
- Messages From The Past (Just A Stroll Down Archive Lane) Mario, October 29 @ 6:22 AM (0/0)
- Health as a TLD pschloeffel, October 29 @ 2:51 AM (1/1)
- A "fresh" .web database is the only fair approach. CyberCitizen, October 28 @ 11:36 PM (5/5)
- Image Online Design must run .web johnnie, October 28 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)
- IATA barmar, October 28 @ 4:10 PM (0/0)
- we support the trade union proposal rousselot, October 28 @ 11:38 AM (0/0)
- Multilingual TLD (¤¤¤å.com) dannyd@post.com, October 28 @ 8:43 AM (1/1)
- .co-op andrewmoore, October 28 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)
- One thing for sure....Dot Com needs competition......Dot Web is the answer Gregory W. Krajewski, October 28 @ 4:31 AM (0/0)
- Please read for yourself why there is so much Anti-Afilias, Neustar sentiment on this board Gregory W. Krajewski, October 28 @ 4:08 AM (1/1)
- level of conversation Ville, October 27 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)
- "Beware the ICANN Board Squatter" jtrade, October 27 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)
- .co-op TLD support Arnold Oliver, October 27 @ 5:47 PM (2/2)
- Oppose IATA as travel domain provider DBToursInt, October 27 @ 5:45 PM (1/1)
- .co-op support Deborah, October 27 @ 5:17 PM (0/0)
- Dot Museum As Top Level Domain Name Oregon Heritage Commission, October 27 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)
- If We Post About Stubbs, Do We Post Under Afilias? Neustar? Core? Others? pilot2, October 27 @ 1:19 PM (0/0)
- CAE's support of IATA proposal to sponsor a ".travel" TLD isaacs, October 27 @ 11:07 AM (0/0)
- .HEALTH and WHO chriz, October 27 @ 10:54 AM (0/0)
- .kids tld - general observations john.carr, October 27 @ 9:09 AM (2/2)
- Network Solutions and Great Domains....Register.com and Afternic.com...hmmm Gregory W. Krajewski, October 27 @ 2:08 AM (1/1)
- Going Offline cambler, October 27 @ 2:03 AM (1/1)
- Supporting new domain name ".co-op" San Luis Valley R.E.C., October 26 @ 10:53 PM (0/0)
- *****DIRECT QUESTIONS TO KEN STUBBS***** Monty, October 26 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)
- Afilias get .web and IOD supporters get their (pre)-Registrations Rebeka, October 26 @ 10:20 PM (1/2)
- IATA support Haymaker, October 26 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
- ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence) fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)
- Msnbc-Meeks-Icann Webster, October 26 @ 5:58 PM (4/17)
- Ken Stubbs (Daily News-Nov. 07/99) shawn, October 26 @ 5:44 PM (2/3)
- ZDNet Highlights The MSNBC Article! The Link Is In This Post. pilot2, October 26 @ 4:33 PM (0/0)
- IATA .travel TLD Application ADP, October 26 @ 2:47 PM (0/0)
- The Real Numbers (The Commentary Process Is being PEVERTED) Global View, October 26 @ 1:15 PM (3/4)
- TO ICANN board members, staff, and applicants.........WHERE ARE YOU???? Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 4:27 AM (1/1)
- .SEX, .XXX, .KIDS TLDs Provide a Freedom of Choice - reply to Ron 1000 lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:42 AM (1/2)
- request for our trademark - answer from NSI - should we now go to whois GD ted, October 26 @ 1:26 AM (0/0)
- Monopoly gets bigger! first1, October 26 @ 12:50 AM (0/0)
- Ken Stubbs condems NSI but Afilias makes the same mistakes! anthony, October 25 @ 11:47 PM (0/0)
- It occurs to me. World Thoughts, October 25 @ 11:38 PM (0/0)
- NSI/Verisign Buys GreatDomains.com jtrade, October 25 @ 11:33 PM (1/1)
- ICANN IS NOT DEMOCRATIC - President Ether Dyson ted, October 25 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)
- domain name ".co-op" tech, October 25 @ 9:17 PM (1/1)
- How about pioneer preference? Jeffrey, October 25 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)
- MODERATOR! -- Display messages from: 1 day ago etc. -- doesn't work. Rebeka, October 25 @ 6:17 PM (1/2)
- ICANN = NSI? where's the competition? sboisvert, October 25 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
- undue influence arturo, October 25 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
- New Domain Name ".co-op" Tricounty, October 25 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)
- To C.Ambler, IOD: QUESTION IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:15 PM (0/0)
- Dump the dots. jackb_guppy, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)
- why .dip ? dargento, October 25 @ 10:52 AM (0/0)
- New Registration of eTLD to compliment gTLD and ccTLD available boris7, October 25 @ 8:13 AM (0/0)
- ".tel" Nicole, October 25 @ 5:30 AM (2/3)
- MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web jtrade, October 25 @ 3:41 AM (2/2)
- Comments Period Must be Extended Even Longer! jtrade, October 25 @ 3:32 AM (1/2)
- Voting on New Tld Applications jtrade, October 24 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)
- Following the rules TheWatcher, October 24 @ 7:15 PM (1/2)
- As I Promised-Question For Chris Ambler CrossFire, October 24 @ 4:57 PM (1/4)
- Choosing wisely concerned, October 24 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)
- MODERATOR Please HELP!!!!! Forum open for comments until Sunday, 5 November 2000. Rebeka, October 24 @ 3:59 PM (1/1)
- .co-op Marlu Lake, October 24 @ 3:24 PM (1/1)
- proposal for handling trademark and conflicting .web registrations pvos, October 24 @ 2:43 PM (2/2)
- Followup Message For Pilot CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:09 AM (2/7)
- DNSO - Noncommerical Constituency Proposal....Any Comments on their ideas Gregory W. Krajewski, October 24 @ 5:01 AM (2/3)
- inane multiple posting dansokol, October 24 @ 4:54 AM (0/0)
- The world is watching....A spirit of "openness" and cooperation needs to exist...Success will result Gregory W. Krajewski, October 24 @ 4:23 AM (0/0)
- Where is the Competition? jtrade, October 24 @ 1:58 AM (1/2)
- Where's the Competition? jtrade, October 24 @ 1:37 AM (0/0)
- New proof of concept?? -- ICM and Blueberry hill brahim_m, October 24 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
- IOD and Ken Stubbs Merlin, October 24 @ 12:16 AM (1/1)
- .SHARE victim of a $50,000 application fee domainSHARE.com, October 23 @ 10:49 PM (0/0)
- ICANN - please correct the dead link friedrich, October 23 @ 10:25 PM (1/1)
- NSI Cybersquatting jtrade, October 23 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)
- .WS Claims .WEB Is Unfair. Read .WS E-Mail Exchange With ICANN pilot2, October 23 @ 9:56 PM (2/5)
- Apoyamos la creación de dominio para Cooperativas ronaldag, October 23 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
- Support for .DIR TLD cstone, October 23 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
- .co-op shanel, October 23 @ 6:10 PM (2/3)
- Article Touching On Lawsuit Involving NSI And Anti-Trust Matters CrossFire, October 23 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
- A Solicitation For Readers & Feedback CrossFire, October 23 @ 5:43 PM (3/6)
- The truth about .web (short version) fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:28 PM (0/0)
- The truth about .web (long version) fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)
- coop suffix (TLD) name mikeb, October 23 @ 1:03 PM (1/3)
- .co-op TLD mcremc, October 23 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
- $2,500,000 Offer to ICANN julie, October 23 @ 7:36 AM (1/2)
- "General Comments" thread by clicking here ALLDNS, October 22 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)
- MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY. PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!! Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:41 PM (1/3)
- A note about wiredz... marshm, October 22 @ 4:19 PM (2/2)
- The Public HATES Network Solutions Merlin, October 22 @ 4:49 AM (1/3)
- New Afilias Site global view, October 21 @ 11:34 PM (6/12)
- trademarks and preregistration - through IOD or others ted, October 21 @ 8:58 PM (0/0)
- Remember Citizens Band Radio - CB Radio ALLDNS, October 21 @ 6:34 PM (2/5)
- IOD is not fit to operate Registry SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:40 PM (7/7)
- Drop .web !!! Be creative !!! Say_No_To_Afilias, October 21 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
- IOD Registrations wiped out - they were only for showing support. Al Gore, October 21 @ 1:33 PM (3/9)
- What TLD's Should I be looking to register? gonzo1977, October 21 @ 9:37 AM (1/1)
- INFORMATION REGARDING THE FOCI PETITION TheScribe, October 21 @ 8:18 AM (8/9)
- US Centric TLD - again! gpine, October 21 @ 8:14 AM (3/8)
- ICANN & IOD Merlin, October 21 @ 7:00 AM (2/7)
- Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:47 AM (8/13)
- Sherman & Clayton Antitrust Acts & Afilias Merlin, October 21 @ 3:53 AM (1/1)
- About TLDs intended for Childrens applications (as .KIDS): Comments and Recommendations on Proposals vany_martinez, October 21 @ 1:21 AM (1/1)
- My e-mail to Senator Boxer - for public review. friedrich, October 21 @ 12:31 AM (1/4)
- Let's Talk About NeuStar Eliahu, October 20 @ 10:07 PM (2/11)
- Draft-Any Comments? Also, Need Catchy Title For Subject. Facilitator, October 20 @ 10:03 PM (4/15)
- JVTeam not only try to take .web from IOD they avoided paying ICANN its $50,000 Anthony, October 20 @ 10:03 PM (1/2)
- Wanted: Ballot Indicating All Names Of Those Opposed To Afilias & Neustar Facilitator, October 20 @ 9:57 PM (2/3)
- What Date and Time Does This Board Close? Infinity, October 20 @ 9:51 PM (2/3)
- Wanted: Letter That Sums Events To Send To Congress & Agencies Facilitator, October 20 @ 9:50 PM (2/10)
- Neustar/MelbourneIT and .Web Merlin, October 20 @ 9:50 PM (0/0)
- Some Names Council History jtrade, October 20 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
- Impeach Stubbs Smart, October 20 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
- senator@boxer.senate.gov = Barbara Boxer's E-Mail Address pilot, October 20 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)
- Vote 'No Confidence' in Ken Stubbs - please resign due to conflict of interest JaseK, October 20 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)
- Who are Local Congress People? Smart, October 20 @ 7:57 PM (2/3)
- Complain to California Attorney General Smart, October 20 @ 7:39 PM (0/0)
- Ken Stubbs is Laughing at YOU>>>>>> whatsupdoc, October 20 @ 7:06 PM (2/5)
- Congress Smart, October 20 @ 6:23 PM (1/3)
- .WEB Registry Ryan4, October 20 @ 6:15 PM (1/1)
- Why Didn't Afilias Include .Shop And Others On Their Application? Eliahu, October 20 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)
- Domain Names With Built-In Brand Equity Will Be Taken Out Of Use Under Afilias Plan! Facilitator, October 20 @ 4:55 PM (0/0)
- New Argument For Opposing Afilias Plan!!! Facilitator, October 20 @ 4:44 PM (0/0)
- Useless julie, October 20 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
- Lack Of Afilias Representation In This Forum pilot, October 20 @ 4:05 PM (2/2)
- wrong-headed methodology sourceview, October 20 @ 4:01 PM (0/0)
- dispute between CNN and cnnews.com marry2000, October 20 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
- ICANN - Opportunity to require enforcement of policy ALLDNS, October 20 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
- AFILIAS - Is it unethical . . . ? ALLDNS, October 20 @ 11:57 AM (1/1)
- CORE apparently unwilling to properly manage US CORE Members ALLDNS, October 20 @ 10:54 AM (1/18)
- Complaints Regarding CASDNS Business Practices Requested ALLDNS, October 20 @ 9:00 AM (0/0)
- Complaints Regarding CORE & ASS Business Practices Requested ALLDNS, October 20 @ 8:48 AM (0/0)
- Afilias:Competition and Ken Stubbs Merlin, October 20 @ 8:26 AM (1/7)
- Affilias vs. Afilias enforcer, October 20 @ 8:23 AM (3/3)
- Top level Domain names - ravicabral, October 20 @ 8:08 AM (1/1)
- Precedent:::: InterNic Permitted **PRE** registrations in 1993 ian-francis-xavier, October 20 @ 6:23 AM (0/0)
- General Observations of the Past Few Days Facilitator, October 20 @ 5:50 AM (0/0)
- September Names Council Meeting! jtrade, October 20 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)
- How Generic are these proposals - internationalisation? internat?, October 20 @ 4:10 AM (0/0)
- Ethics, competition, pioneer rights Hather, October 20 @ 3:45 AM (1/1)
- Network Solutions and Bad Security jtrade, October 20 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)
- Names Council Meeting jtrade, October 20 @ 1:10 AM (2/4)
- more trademark problems in surprising places Judith Oppenheimer, October 20 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
- ICANN scammed out of $950,000 I agree Merlin, October 20 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)
- Think Afilias is bad, check out a future Communist Government owned registry emc2, October 19 @ 10:28 PM (2/3)
- THE TRUTH: Some trademarks will become invalid. friedrich, October 19 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
- More Conflict of Interest? jtrade, October 19 @ 8:32 PM (1/1)
- Afilias/NSI - a Cybersquatter in bad faith? Rebeka, October 19 @ 7:22 PM (3/3)
- .traveln traveln, October 19 @ 7:08 PM (2/3)
- Pre-registrations were allowed in 1993 for .com fabrcop, October 19 @ 4:28 PM (3/6)
- Unhappy Customers Merlin, October 19 @ 8:38 AM (0/0)
- Don't be suckered in by those Afilias supporters. What they say is absurd. Instead, support IOD... USC, October 19 @ 8:37 AM (0/0)
- Ken Stubbs,to close for comfort! Merlin, October 19 @ 8:30 AM (0/0)
- Don't be too hasty - use established registrars vicspanner, October 19 @ 7:42 AM (1/5)
- GO TO WWW.JOINFOCI.ORG........ SUPPORT IMAGE ONLINE DESIGN'S .WEB.......AFILIAS SHMAFILIAS!!!!!!! USC, October 19 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)
- The UDRP will make all discussion concerning initial domain registration useless... zzmars, October 19 @ 6:21 AM (0/0)
- Link to Slide Presentations on NSI's Future Plans RDM, October 19 @ 6:12 AM (1/1)
- IOD Exposed #6 (sex.web) Whistleblower, October 19 @ 5:14 AM (10/13)
- I was impressed because IOD did NOT reserve several domains fabrcop, October 19 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
- Sir, there is no fire here. For The People, October 19 @ 10:11 AM (1/2)
- cybersquating & speculating is NOT the issue //it's control of INFO by AOL ian-francis-xavier, October 19 @ 7:05 AM (0/0)
- Thanks "Whistle Blower" You managed to get us off topic...which i suspect you wanted... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 6:03 AM (0/0)
- Conflict of Interest Defined jtrade, October 19 @ 6:02 AM (0/0)
- Conspiracy? Try Blatant abuse jranes2, October 19 @ 5:55 AM (0/0)
- You Are Unjustly Comparing "Conflict Of Interest" With "Insider Trading" Eliahu, October 19 @ 5:52 AM (0/0)
- Thanks for the compliment! You closet posters only help IOD's postion... Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 5:41 AM (0/0)
- Scared jtrade, October 19 @ 5:35 AM (0/0)
- Yup... cambler, October 19 @ 5:18 AM (1/1)
- IOD Exposed #5 (the witnesses speak) Whistleblower, October 19 @ 4:48 AM (2/3)
- IOD Exposed #4 (what the court had to say) Whistleblower, October 19 @ 4:37 AM (2/2)
- IOD Exposed #3 Whistleblower, October 19 @ 4:09 AM (2/2)
- IOD Exposed #2 Whistleblower, October 19 @ 4:03 AM (3/4)
- IOD Exposed #1 Whistleblower, October 19 @ 3:44 AM (5/5)
- Only Chartered TLDs dmhwalker, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (1/1)
- Network Solutions and Restraint of Trade jtrade, October 19 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)
- NSI Experienced High Level of Uncollectible Receivables - Latest 10-K RDM, October 19 @ 12:36 AM (1/4)
- ICANN'T TOLERATE CORRUPTION jranes2, October 19 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)
- Why doesn't everyone support IOD? Doc again, October 18 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
- Interesting Article RDM, October 18 @ 11:35 PM (2/3)
- Did Ken Stubbs Have Access To IOD's Application Before Afillias Submitted? Mr. Lawrence1, October 18 @ 11:32 PM (3/13)
- I want a .LOVE not a .WAR ! OrlandoMM, October 18 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)
- .kids domain prshaw, October 18 @ 10:15 PM (0/0)
- How does ICANN Vote? Merlin , October 18 @ 9:47 PM (3/3)
- My Internet, your Internet, our Internet! friedrich, October 18 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
- ICANN Will Pick Afilias? Eliahu, October 18 @ 8:53 PM (3/3)
- Oversight RDM, October 18 @ 8:17 PM (1/2)
- ICANN is the cause of the indignation, NOT IOD supporters vdfman, October 18 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)
- For ICANN to award .web to Afilias would be a massive anti-trust issue. Hudgens, October 18 @ 7:43 PM (1/1)
- Just got "bulk-mailed" by NSI PHXbird, October 18 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
- After thorough research of applications, I agree with IOD... zzmars, October 18 @ 6:50 PM (0/0)
- IOD supporters make the news! ludacris, October 18 @ 5:59 PM (0/0)
- ¼¼°è °¢±¹ ¾ð¾î·Î Æ÷·³ÀÌ °³¼³µÇ¾î¾ß Çϸç, ¼¼°è ¸ðµç »ç¶÷ÀÇ Àǻ簡 ÀÚÀ¯·Ó°Ô Ç¥½ÃµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. JP Kim, October 18 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)
- Network Solutions Scandal Merlin, October 18 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
- Real People Don't Care philberent, October 18 @ 4:05 PM (5/9)
- Timing of Decision Making Process Pistoff, October 18 @ 3:46 PM (1/1)
- name-space knows how to do it asw, October 18 @ 12:32 AM (1/1)
- The importance of Meaning and Generality Filip, October 18 @ 12:24 AM (0/0)
- Ken Stubbs has links to 15 TLDs!! doc again, October 18 @ 11:53 AM (1/1)
- IOD = excellent customer service treherne, October 18 @ 9:30 AM (1/1)
- Neustar and Afilias Bid to Steal .Web jtrade, October 18 @ 1:47 AM (2/2)
- David vs Goliath CBK, October 18 @ 1:28 AM (0/0)
- Dot..tv registration is highly questionable. zeo, October 17 @ 11:13 PM (2/2)
- No monopolies please RKnight, October 17 @ 9:59 PM (1/6)
- Why all the focus on ONE TLD? lapointe, October 17 @ 8:37 PM (1/15)
- Neustar Attempting to BRIBE ICANN? jtrade, October 17 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)
- Throwing out the .kid with the .xxx bathwater. markusbaccus, October 17 @ 8:09 PM (1/3)
- World Thoughts, A Must Read jtrade, October 17 @ 7:42 PM (4/34)
- Ken Stubbs & Conflict Of Interest Policy RDM, October 17 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
- Interesting Article RDM, October 17 @ 5:46 PM (1/4)
- Want to see another monopoly? ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 5:41 PM (5/48)
- Any Connection With Afilias? (i.e. Affiliate Program) Mario, October 17 @ 5:37 PM (0/0)
- IOD Court Ruling - FACTS ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 5:26 PM (1/1)
- IOD deserves .WEB, stop the monopoly IraChandler, October 17 @ 4:46 PM (1/1)
- Support for Image Online Design URLMerchant, October 17 @ 4:12 PM (1/2)
- Pre-Registration, even in .WEB, is premature zzmars, October 17 @ 4:06 PM (3/3)
- This process is extremely complicated especially if you don't speak English!! Neila, October 17 @ 3:27 PM (1/1)
- We Need Help! ChrisT, October 17 @ 2:50 PM (0/0)
- IOD should be the owner of .WEB Addresses Rhoades, October 17 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
- Summary fabrcop, October 17 @ 1:34 PM (0/0)
- IO Design is clearly the owner of .web chichit, October 17 @ 1:31 PM (1/1)
- It's all been said vinny, October 17 @ 12:48 AM (1/1)
- ICANN, WHY WON'T YOU COMMENT ON THE KEN STUBBS ISSUE? anthony, October 17 @ 11:32 AM (1/1)
- IOD .WEB Michael Fox, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)
- Ethical Suicide Merlin, October 17 @ 9:16 AM (1/1)
- no .WEB at all Makla, October 17 @ 8:52 AM (2/3)
- The Tangled .WEB They Weave.... jtrade, October 17 @ 7:28 AM (1/1)
- Register .WEB Andy, October 17 @ 7:17 AM (1/1)
- About any proposed gTLD with strings and acronyms that implies geographical regions and .GEO vany_martinez, October 17 @ 7:06 AM (0/0)
- Monopolies MUST be stopped C.Bell, October 17 @ 7:02 AM (1/1)
- My history with NSI.. ** Please write YOURS ****** rantawi, October 17 @ 6:51 AM (0/0)
- About .KIDS, .WOMEN, .XXX and .SEX vany_martinez, October 17 @ 6:37 AM (1/2)
- Neustar Attempting to BRIBE ICANN for .WEB? jtrade, October 17 @ 6:29 AM (0/0)
- Posting of Applications & Legal bills (applicant for .web # 3) BELLC, October 17 @ 6:27 AM (0/0)
- Messages Commenting on gTLDs were Censored keith246, October 17 @ 4:29 AM (0/0)
- Most People not know what mean .pro .nom .biz .dir ... JP Kim, October 17 @ 4:21 AM (0/0)
- Parody gTLDs must be restricted to be permitted by the courts keith246, October 17 @ 4:07 AM (0/0)
- Concrete Name is more good for ASIA and Africa, East Europe, Latin America people. JP Kim, October 17 @ 3:58 AM (1/1)
- The issue isn't which 3 letters follow the last dot keith246, October 17 @ 3:54 AM (0/0)
- Unrestricted gTLDs will waste the resource and solve nothing keith246, October 17 @ 3:42 AM (1/8)
- WEB TLD's swallace, October 17 @ 3:37 AM (2/3)
- BE FAIR billlevy, October 17 @ 2:17 AM (0/0)
- Explanation please... huguesdb, October 17 @ 12:55 AM (2/6)
- IOD .Web supporters and those for Competition jtrade, October 17 @ 12:19 AM (2/2)
- .WEB TLD vd, October 17 @ 12:15 AM (3/3)
- web registry tennis, October 16 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)
- Support for Image Online Design and the .web TLD Hudgens, October 16 @ 9:47 PM (4/6)
- We all want .web, can Afilias and IOD run it together? Stoertebeker, October 16 @ 8:06 PM (1/1)
- Afilias.tv Merlin, October 16 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
- Jon Postel's words Reidar, October 16 @ 6:24 PM (2/2)
- Ken Stubbs - VP & Director of iDomain, Inc. (Another Applicant) RDM, October 16 @ 6:18 PM (0/0)
- Ken Stubbs/Sunrise Period Merlin, October 16 @ 6:11 PM (0/0)
- TLD applications .kids algajola24, October 16 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)
- Read the applications: IODesign is the best choice for .web fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:36 PM (0/0)
- Vote to extend discussion forum emc2, October 16 @ 5:17 PM (1/1)
- Now you can pre-register for the 7 new TLD's .firm, .shop, .arts, .rec, .info, .nom and .web free! Rebeka, October 16 @ 4:56 PM (2/8)
- Password Revoked Second Time TheWebster2, October 16 @ 4:10 PM (5/10)
- There are other applications to consider lapointe, October 16 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
- No advantage for IOD for their bad business pratice KMalorny, October 16 @ 2:52 PM (2/5)
- Questions for C.Ambler (IOD) IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:19 AM (1/5)
- Ken Stubbs - how many apps are you involved with? jandl, October 16 @ 8:46 AM (1/1)
- ICANN: I am waiting for answers from the respective APPLICANTS in this FORUM! friedrich, October 16 @ 8:12 AM (3/4)
- Cookie Web-bugs use explodes with additional generic TLDs davebr, October 16 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
- Moderator, where are you? pedro, October 16 @ 5:46 AM (3/3)
- Reply to Hold on a second... — marshm, emc2, October 16 @ 5:08 AM (0/0)
- Delay Selection of New GTLDs Until New Board Members Added enforcer, October 16 @ 4:20 AM (1/1)
- Name-Space fred, October 16 @ 3:54 AM (1/2)
- Are we missing the point here? marshm, October 16 @ 3:35 AM (3/3)
- How can Stubbs be removed from ICANN? mmtb1111, October 16 @ 2:42 AM (1/1)
- Want accept all TLDs, .art .trade .market .music ... kim, October 16 @ 1:50 AM (3/5)
- Just LOOK at this place! (3 main issues) anthony, October 16 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)
- How can we comment on un-posted TLD applications ?? & trademarks issue emc2, October 16 @ 12:05 AM (2/3)
- Is .web not an 'alternate root system'? huguesdb, October 16 @ 12:03 AM (2/6)
- Honoring Existing Contracts Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)
- We are so caught up, we are forgetting one thing. For The People, October 15 @ 11:38 PM (1/2)
- Go IOD ! treherne, October 15 @ 11:19 PM (0/0)
- Password Revoked TheWebster, October 15 @ 10:28 PM (1/1)
- Project Trojan Horse TheWebster1, October 15 @ 10:24 PM (1/1)
- _ Ken Stubbs Should Step Down From ICANN or Afilias. internet78, October 15 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
- If Afilias has so much power, why do they not flood this message board with supporters? Stoertebeker, October 15 @ 8:20 PM (2/6)
- If ICANN decides that Name.Space has the best application - do they get ALL their new TLD names? Rebeka, October 15 @ 7:34 PM (2/6)
- An Open Letter to IOD Supporters cambler, October 15 @ 7:31 PM (4/7)
- A 60 day sunrise period! first1, October 15 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
- Time frame for new TLDs kularski, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
- Network Solutions SPOOKY Past Merlin, October 15 @ 6:26 PM (1/1)
- I am horrified by a sunrise period for the Afilias Cartel!!! Rebeka, October 15 @ 5:52 PM (3/13)
- Afilias limits regestration to 10 years max!! Anthony, October 15 @ 5:35 PM (1/1)
- TO ALL POSTERS: - Please list your name and Where you are from...ALSO more on our Grassroot Efforts Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)
- Afilias - 100% conflict of interest pedro, October 15 @ 5:22 PM (0/0)
- Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? friedrich, October 15 @ 5:02 PM (1/1)
- A matter of Public Trust mhubbard, October 15 @ 4:51 PM (0/0)
- IOD meets the criteria for stability, Affilias does not. doc, October 15 @ 2:23 PM (1/28)
- The Comment Process to-date - An analysis TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:42 AM (2/2)
- same opinions PSH, October 15 @ 9:33 AM (1/4)
- Ken Stubs - Insider TheWebster, October 15 @ 9:29 AM (0/0)
- ICANN - how do you grant equal chances for all, to register new TLD's on day 1? Rebeka, October 15 @ 8:59 AM (3/17)
- It's the same feeling. LGW, October 15 @ 8:54 AM (2/7)
- Can of worms pedro, October 15 @ 8:29 AM (1/2)
- I am confident in ICANN's fairness fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:21 AM (2/11)
- Register.com (=Afilias) is unable to handle new TLD's Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:32 AM (2/2)
- PROTEST pedro, October 15 @ 5:44 AM (2/9)
- Impropriety Not Likely jranes, October 15 @ 2:57 AM (2/2)
- TO THE MODERATOR: Can discussions be broken out by TLDs? Robert_Jacobson, October 15 @ 2:49 AM (1/1)
- DO NOT ADD .XXX or .SEX CHOOSE MORE WISELY Frank S., October 15 @ 2:34 AM (1/1)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -ATTENTION: ICANN icann_, October 15 @ 2:20 AM (1/3)
- Ken Stubbs - CPA TheWebster, October 15 @ 1:37 AM (0/0)
- KEN STUBBS - SHAME ON YOU Frank S., October 15 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)
- Praise to IOD q, October 15 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)
- Keep NSI OUT! kodo, October 15 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)
- A Recommendation to Posters, A Call to ICANN For The People, October 15 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
- SPECULATION friedrich, October 15 @ 12:19 AM (1/2)
- a comment on the .web tld economist, October 14 @ 11:57 PM (1/1)
- This board is an embarassment BrianC, October 14 @ 11:51 PM (5/11)
- Quotes from the Afilias fact sheet. hoffy, October 14 @ 10:58 PM (1/1)
- TO ICANN: Merlin, October 14 @ 10:48 PM (1/1)
- ICANN in an Attempt to Censor our Posts? Merlin, October 14 @ 10:31 PM (1/1)
- SMOKE & MIRRORS TRUTH BE TOLD, October 14 @ 9:23 PM (3/3)
- Ken Stubbs - Caught in the act? joshwa, October 14 @ 9:13 PM (0/0)
- I support Afilias and registered Afilias.web today! Stoertebeker, October 14 @ 9:05 PM (2/2)
- NSI and Register.com in Bed Together Merlin, October 14 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)
- Message from Saudi Arabia - TRUTH about NSI and IOD rantawi, October 14 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)
- .Web phelix00, October 14 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)
- KEN STUBBS - WHO IS HE ? (I THINK WE ALL KNOW) lew, October 14 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)
- TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot Web/IOD /Supporters are getting ORGANIZED..Building a Website! Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:52 PM (6/9)
- How can one comment when the apps are not posted? jandl, October 14 @ 6:28 PM (1/2)
- Http://www.Afilias.tv Merlin, October 14 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)
- Fragmenting the net jandl, October 14 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
- NO IMAGE ONLINE AS A .WEB contract jtuttle, October 14 @ 5:48 PM (6/8)
- URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest Infinity, October 14 @ 5:43 PM (2/4)
- .SEX, .XXX, .KIDS TLDs Restrict Freedom of Speech ron10000, October 14 @ 5:10 PM (8/8)
- Opportunity for WWW to set a global standard iceberg, October 31 @ 3:32 PM (0/0)
- IT'S ABOUT OUR KIDS ! ! ! AdvantaTel, October 18 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
- Quit hair-splitting. That's not what these domains are for. lrfarny, October 17 @ 3:32 AM (0/0)
- Red-Light & Green Space TLD (fact v. fiction) mpalage, October 17 @ 2:32 AM (0/0)
- .XXX, .SEX, ect kularski, October 14 @ 10:21 PM (0/0)
- .sex and .xxx domains sairanx, October 14 @ 10:00 PM (0/0)
- "Restrictive" TLDs PHXbird, October 14 @ 8:53 PM (0/0)
- What??!! americeo, October 14 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)
- IMAGE ONLINE IS DESERVING OF .WEB contract chicagoan, October 14 @ 5:07 PM (2/5)
- IOD the .web pioneer first1, October 14 @ 5:06 PM (2/6)
- Application by Image Online Design sduncan, October 14 @ 5:04 PM (3/7)
- Permission granted! Permission NEVER revoked! larreeee, October 14 @ 5:01 PM (1/4)
- Why is this even happening... bags, October 14 @ 4:56 PM (2/2)
- Separation of Registry and Registrar Functions RobS, October 14 @ 4:56 PM (1/1)
- IOD has acted in Good Faith Robert Garner, October 14 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)
- Another Monopol ? Killah, October 14 @ 3:55 PM (0/0)
- ICANN SCAMMED OUT OF ( $950,000 ) BY AFILIAS CARTEL! AdvantaTel, October 14 @ 3:53 PM (2/12)
- Vote for .Web / Vote for IOD anthony, October 14 @ 3:25 PM (2/3)
- .WEB MDS, October 14 @ 2:33 PM (2/7)
- Have you ever dealt with NSI? mpayette, October 14 @ 2:23 PM (0/0)
- A general question to ICANN cgrady, October 14 @ 7:43 AM (2/6)
- Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy RDM, October 14 @ 5:10 AM (2/3)
- EOI #22...I'm throwing my support to the IOD's .web registry USC, October 14 @ 4:57 AM (0/0)
- Keep NSI out cbk, October 14 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
- .SEX, .XXX, .KIDS TLDs Restrict Freedom of Speech ron10000, October 14 @ 3:31 AM (0/0)
- NSI monopoly! first1, October 14 @ 1:48 AM (3/4)
- Keep NSI Out Attorney, October 14 @ 1:37 AM (1/2)
- Keep NSI out pedro, October 14 @ 12:49 AM (0/0)
- After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices saskia, October 13 @ 11:11 PM (3/3)
- Why applicants for a TLD should pay 50 000 $ lpele, October 13 @ 10:28 PM (2/3)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy