ICANN Public Comments Forum | New TLDs

This Comment Forum is now closed.

ICANN Public Comment Forum

Introduction of New Top-Level Domains

At its meeting on 15-16 July 2000 in Yokohama, Japan, the ICANN Board is expected to consider adopting a policy under which new top-level domains would be introduced to the Internet Domain Name System in a measured and responsible manner. This Public Comment Forum is dedicated to the discussion of proposals for such a policy. To review a paper summarizing the issues, please click here. Written comments should be submitted by 10 July 2000.

Comments Through Wed, July 12, 2000

Link to the actual doc where IANA transfered resp to ICANN---A Must SEE! — Gregory Krajewski, 3:01 AM (1/1)

Excellent! — bartender, 6:00 AM (0/0)

would the problem be different if TLDs did not exist? — jefsey, 2:24 AM (0/0)

how to get paid the non-refundable TLD application fee without neutrality breach — jefsey, 1:52 AM (0/0)

How Many People Here Can't Get a Domain? — Layman, 10:54 PM (1/1)

Thanks Layman — jestiny, 2:55 AM (0/0)

FORUM - meaning, a public meeting, discussion or tribunal — Garry Anderson, 10:45 PM (2/3)

everybody did — freedom2001, 11:56 PM (0/0)
That is the way the system works — Layman, 11:01 PM (1/1)

oh yeah! But nothing prevents people from being clever — jefsey, 2:01 AM (0/0)

"Trademark Squatters" — freedom2001, 4:34 PM (3/3)

You are right, lets count it together. — friedrich, 5:35 PM (0/0)
TRADEMARKS vs TLDs — Sotiris, 5:30 PM (0/0)
"Trademark squatting" — Publius, 5:24 PM (0/0)

".xxx" TLD is a bad idea... — Publius, 2:57 PM (1/2)

You hit the nail — Venster, 9:51 PM (1/1)

equal opportunity suppression — Publius, 11:05 PM (0/0)

Why do I register a trademark? To make profit? Why do I register a domain name? To make profit? — friedrich, 12:37 AM (2/4)

INTERESTING TWIST -- I NOTICED YOU'VE CHANGED YOUR POSTION TOWARD THE OPPOSITE POLE OF THE ISSUE — Nestor DR, 8:23 PM (0/0)
Agreed — hmg, 1:35 PM (1/2)

Right, but ... — friedrich, 5:24 PM (1/1)

MORATORIUM — Sotiris, 5:35 PM (0/0)

No new tld's until......cont. — hmg, 12:07 AM (0/0)

Yokohama meeting — RJGlass, 9:25 AM (0/0)

new TDL's — aligator, 9:02 AM (0/0)

My last words: Internet God's - do they hear us? Paul Mockapetris are you here? — fnord, Tue 8:03 AM (0/0)

GOD BLESS AMERICA !!!! INDEED !!!! (AND YOU ALL !!!) — Nestor DR, Tue 7:10 AM (0/0)

My Last Word. — 410, Tue 7:10 AM (0/0)

My Last Word. — Sotiris, Tue 7:02 AM (0/0)

The Last Word — Merlin, Tue 6:25 AM (0/0)

See you in Yokohama — cambler, Tue 6:16 AM (0/0)

The reason for providing complete information? — jandl, Tue 6:10 AM (0/0)

The last word: — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 5:59 AM (1/2)

Amen — jandl, Tue 6:14 AM (1/1)

Amen(tm) is a registered trademark in the uspto. — dotweb, Tue 7:51 AM (0/0)

Comments -- introduction of new TLDs — Jon Weinberg, Tue 5:46 AM (2/2)

Excellent post! — Gregory Krajewski, 2:11 AM (0/0)
Comments — jandl, Tue 6:27 AM (0/0)

Question for Sotiris — bigtymer, Tue 4:04 AM (2/11)

seemingly random mumblings ... (Bigtymer, very polite of yours ...) — friedrich, 12:10 AM (0/0)
Answer for "bigtymer" — Sotiris, Tue 4:27 AM (1/9)

My point exactly... — bigtymer, Tue 4:45 AM (1/8)

Really? — Sotiris, Tue 4:59 AM (1/7)

Chartered TLDs would not require rigorous ICANN enforcement to work if.... — Galomb, Tue 3:54 AM (0/0)

Worldwide swindle. — Sotiris, Tue 3:39 AM (0/0)

The term "cybersquatters" — Sotiris, Tue 3:11 AM (1/4)

Get your facts straight — bigtymer, Tue 3:45 AM (2/3)

Well, then your facts aren't straight either — cambler, Tue 6:56 AM (1/1)

What about people who register A TRADEMARK in order TO SELL IT AT A HIGHER VALUE LATER ON? — friedrich, 12:05 AM (0/0)

Read the news sometime... — Sotiris, Tue 4:34 AM (0/0)

No New TLDs, Several New TLDs, Dozens New TLDs, or Unlimited TLDs? — layman, Tue 3:02 AM (0/0)

How nice. — Sotiris, Tue 2:53 AM (0/0)

Auctioning Domain Names for the Common Good — achander, Tue 2:35 AM (4/21)

A Very Good Suggestion from achander — layman, Tue 3:26 AM (2/13)

Of course — bigtymer, Tue 4:21 AM (2/11)

I beg to differ........................................ — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 5:15 AM (1/1)

No Freedom of Speech here... — Sotiris, Tue 5:19 AM (0/0)

So you have no vested interests. . . — WorldThoughts, Tue 4:42 AM (1/8)

Great analogies, but... — bigtymer, Tue 4:58 AM (5/7)

It had the legal right to do so from at least July - December 1996 ... — friedrich, 11:57 AM (0/0)
You wrong littletymer — Merlin, Tue 5:06 AM (0/0)
Much as I hate to admit it... — Sotiris, Tue 5:03 AM (0/0)
link — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 5:02 AM (0/0)
Not even worth arguing about — cambler, Tue 5:02 AM (1/2)

Argue it in court — bigtymer, Tue 5:09 AM (1/1)

In Court — cambler, Tue 5:37 AM (0/0)

The Right of Speech. The Right to Speak Loudly. — 410, Tue 4:06 AM (0/0)

ridiculous — Merlin, Tue 3:19 AM (1/1)

You know there's a problem, — Sotiris, Tue 3:26 AM (0/0)

Finite Resource? Hardly. — cambler, Tue 2:57 AM (1/1)

The only finite thing when it comes to TLDs is a wilful "lack of imagination" — Sotiris, Tue 3:03 AM (0/0)

A "professor" of law is what you are, the reality is a different matter however... — Sotiris, Tue 2:45 AM (2/2)

Fair / Unfair — friedrich, Tue 2:54 AM (0/0)
Too bad they don't apply your theories when it comes to FOOD production and distribution. — Sotiris, Tue 2:50 AM (0/0)

No new tld's until...... — hmg, Tue 2:19 AM (2/2)

In reply — hmg, 11:58 AM (0/0)
We are serious... — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 2:55 AM (0/0)

AND THIS TOO! — Sotiris, Tue 2:15 AM (1/1)

one question. — Sotiris, Tue 2:23 AM (0/0)

GET A LOAD OF THIS... — Sotiris, Tue 2:08 AM (0/0)

the future is obviously http://johnny-junky.smith — jefsey, Tue 1:33 AM (1/3)

About the Phone Number — layman, Tue 3:43 AM (1/2)

Calling Home — WorldThoughts, Tue 4:18 AM (1/1)

The 63 character limit is technically imposed, not mandated — cambler, Tue 4:45 AM (0/0)

AT&T�s Comments to ICANN�s June 13, 2000 Request for Comment — Nakia, Tue 12:40 AM (6/24)

Conflict of Interest? — Merlin, Tue 2:43 AM (1/3)

Grow Up — bigtymer, Tue 4:11 AM (1/2)

My Rights — Merlin, Tue 4:36 AM (1/1)

More insults... — bigtymer, Tue 5:00 AM (0/0)

ATT your a Joke — Merlin, Tue 2:20 AM (2/2)

Nice argument... — bigtymer, Tue 2:28 AM (0/0)
In defense of... — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 2:23 AM (0/0)

are we talking about the wame world - happy you are late — jefsey, Tue 2:20 AM (0/0)
DAVID AND GOLIATH SHAKE HANDS :-) [ ATT, A GIANT, AND MYSELF, A PLAIN FOLK, HAVE THE SAME ANSWERS] — Nestor DR, Tue 2:14 AM (2/4)

Surprise, surprise, ... — friedrich, Tue 2:24 AM (1/2)

THINKING IS MORE VALUABLE . . . — Nestor DR, Tue 2:41 AM (1/1)

Your subject line is correct. — friedrich, Tue 2:43 AM (0/0)

:) — bigtymer, Tue 2:19 AM (0/0)

Where was AT&T before on this board---discussing the issues — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 1:11 AM (1/9)

I understand, but... — bigtymer, Tue 1:39 AM (3/8)

Are you kidding? — WorldThoughts, Tue 1:59 AM (0/0)
However..... — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 1:54 AM (0/0)
If you think big companies consulted their employees... — cambler, Tue 1:47 AM (1/5)

Misunderstanding — bigtymer, Tue 1:55 AM (1/4)

Excuse me? — cambler, Tue 2:00 AM (1/3)

Your Position Statement — bigtymer, Tue 2:14 AM (1/2)

Pretty much, yes... — cambler, Tue 2:23 AM (1/1)

I won't... — bigtymer, Tue 2:30 AM (0/0)

Bible or Bill? — Venster, Tue 1:10 AM (0/0)

IT IS TIME TO TELL THE TRUTH! — friedrich, Tue 12:22 AM (0/0)

Another reason to introduce new TLDs — EA, Tue 12:16 AM (0/0)

comments — kent, Mon 11:59 PM (0/0)

On behalf of the Private Sector Working Group on Trademarks and Domain Names: (PSWG) : — Nakia, Mon 11:55 PM (2/2)

More Nonsense — Merlin, Tue 1:31 AM (0/0)
I disagree — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 12:56 AM (0/0)

Comments regarding 51 to 74 questions about new gTLDs — vany_martinez, Mon 11:39 PM (0/0)

REGISTER.COM COMMENTS REGARDING NEW TLDS — register.com, Mon 11:22 PM (1/2)

Network Solution, and Register.com cannot be the new registrar's... — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 3:21 AM (1/1)

Registry vs. registrar — bigtymer, Tue 5:14 AM (0/0)

Comments regarding 1 to 50 questions about new gTLDs — vany_martinez, Mon 11:21 PM (0/0)

SBA's new gTLDs Comments — Eric Menge, Mon 10:57 PM (1/1)

I second these comments — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 1:18 AM (0/0)

consistency — nascent, Mon 10:19 PM (0/0)

New Top Level Domains — dharrington, Mon 8:09 PM (0/0)

Tucows' Response to Expansion of TLDs — tmdenton, Mon 8:08 PM (0/0)

SBLC comments on Famous Trademark Protection — mkpage, Mon 7:54 PM (1/1)

Short, but well thought! — friedrich, Tue 12:42 AM (0/0)

NEW TOP LEVEL DOMAINS — Wayne krut, Mon 7:54 PM (1/15)

Round Robin System — freedom2001, Mon 8:04 PM (1/14)

Round Robin — friedrich, Tue 12:33 AM (1/13)

A good idea actually... — bigtymer, Tue 1:30 AM (1/12)

Mixed? — friedrich, Tue 1:43 AM (1/11)

Don't think... — bigtymer, Tue 2:00 AM (2/10)

And what of registrations in .web, already taken? — cambler, Tue 2:28 AM (1/5)

The sticky subject of preregistrations — bigtymer, Tue 2:39 AM (1/4)

Simple — cambler, Tue 2:48 AM (1/3)

Well... — bigtymer, Tue 3:36 AM (2/2)

Don't kill off IANA yet...and those pioneers who paved the way — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 4:56 AM (0/0)
bigtymer..Not Correct Entirely,--Here's Why — Voice Of Reason, Tue 4:11 AM (0/0)

... only that every card bears my name ... — friedrich, Tue 2:13 AM (2/3)

a way of having my name on many cards — jefsey, 2:20 AM (0/0)
*sigh* — bigtymer, Tue 2:23 AM (1/1)

Correct statement — friedrich, Tue 2:37 AM (0/0)

MORE WIPO INSANITY — 410, Mon 7:46 PM (2/2)

Where was this Pop Star Sting 5 years ago? — Venster, Tue 12:30 AM (0/0)
P.S. — 410, Tue 12:09 AM (0/0)

new gTLDs — s_bradner, Mon 6:17 PM (2/10)

All Web Site owners are Very concerned with the introduction of new TLD's — jlandrum, Mon 7:07 PM (2/8)

... and to .net or .org owners? — friedrich, Tue 12:00 AM (0/0)
ADDRESS MY POINTS, JACK! — 410, Mon 7:20 PM (2/6)

No duplicating? — Venster, Tue 12:47 AM (1/1)

reply — 410, Tue 1:41 AM (0/0)

410--You obviously did not spend a great deal of money to promote the name of your website! — jlandrum , Mon 9:42 PM (3/3)

I am one of those small business owners — jandl, Tue 5:41 AM (0/0)
Three mice get a cheese ... — friedrich, Tue 12:08 AM (0/0)
Your expense. Possible benefits for your. — 410, Mon 10:01 PM (0/0)

Hey, look — 410, Mon 6:25 PM (0/0)

Replies to the 74 Questions regarding new TLDs — WSchueller, Mon 5:49 PM (0/0)

New TLDs — mshamim, Mon 5:24 PM (0/0)

Replies to the 74 Questions (ii) — John Lewis, Mon 5:16 PM (0/0)

Replies to the 74 Questions (i) — John Lewis, Mon 5:14 PM (0/0)

eNom Expression of Interest — freedom2001, Mon 4:59 PM (0/0)

IMPORTANT COMMENTS FOR ICANN MEMBERS — jlandrum, Mon 3:05 PM (5/5)

sunrise, daybreak - it's all bunk — jandl, Tue 5:26 AM (0/0)
No new grocery store in my street please, ... — friedrich, Mon 10:29 PM (0/0)
I AM A Dot COM Holder--I WANT NEW gTLDs — Voice Of Reason, Mon 3:39 PM (0/0)
It is not fair to only give preference to famous marks - it is illegal — Garry Anderson, Mon 3:21 PM (0/0)
Repeating points. — 410, Mon 3:19 PM (0/0)

Won't new tld's create possible trademark violations? — highvis, Mon 2:59 PM (3/4)

confusion? — jandl, Tue 5:11 AM (0/0)
Nonsense — 410, Mon 3:40 PM (1/1)

You know. . . — 410, Mon 4:12 PM (0/0)

See below - THIS has to be sorted first...... — Garry Anderson, Mon 3:01 PM (0/0)

ground rules for new TLDs:copyright industry perspective — sjmetalitz, Mon 2:56 PM (2/9)

my response to this — fnord, Mon 6:38 PM (0/0)
Infringement Minimization - You are a Joke! — Garry Anderson, Mon 3:15 PM (1/7)

Insults... — freedom2001, Mon 4:42 PM (3/6)

I agree---Let's agrue the issues...not each other — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 1:20 AM (0/0)
Politeness is not always correctness! — friedrich, Mon 10:20 PM (0/0)
Get Your Facts Right — Garry Anderson, Mon 5:38 PM (1/3)

Excuse me — freedom2001, Mon 6:15 PM (1/2)

They stop free speech, fan sites and take away domains — Garry Anderson, Mon 7:58 PM (1/1)

What don't you understand? — freedom2001, Mon 8:13 PM (0/0)

Purposes for tld's — highvis, Mon 2:09 PM (1/1)

nw tdls — aligator, 24 minutes ago (0/0)

Famous Trademark Protection — wanda, Mon 2:01 PM (0/0)

POC Answers to ICANN questions on new TLDs — poc, Mon 1:51 PM (2/2)

EuroInternet Supports POC Answers — javier, 11:58 AM (0/0)
Who is "The POC?" — cambler, Tue 2:14 AM (0/0)

proposing new TLD — wanda, Mon 1:47 PM (0/0)

new TLD's proposals — Jerome, Mon 12:39 AM (0/0)

THIS has to be sorted first, else what is the point of more TLDs? — Garry Anderson, Mon 10:52 AM (1/2)

ICANN - THIS MATTER MUST BE ADDRESSED, AND DECISIVELY! — Sotiris, Mon 1:13 PM (1/1)

Plus ca change... — fnord, Tue 5:49 AM (0/0)

Comment on New Top Level Domains — Tsubo, Mon 10:38 AM (0/0)

Adding TLDs will help with several problems... — sybesma, Mon 9:36 AM (1/1)

Give the sex and xxx sites a tld — markuscoral, Mon 9:01 PM (0/0)

New TLD's, TM's, WIPO and UDRP — jandl, Mon 7:10 AM (8/12)

I agree — saskia, Mon 9:11 PM (0/0)
AGREE — Voice Of Reason, Mon 3:09 PM (0/0)
Wow---No one has said it better — Gregory Krajewski, Mon 12:10 AM (0/0)
UDRP - legalised theft? I CERTAINLY think so. — Garry Anderson, Mon 11:26 AM (0/0)
Excellent comment! — friedrich, Mon 10:23 AM (0/0)
Excellent post — fnord, Mon 8:43 AM (1/2)

Link to webcast and remote participation — saskia, Mon 9:08 PM (1/1)

OT Thanks, I think — fnord, Tue 2:39 AM (0/0)

Absolute agreement here — WorldThoughts, Mon 8:22 AM (1/1)

who says not? — jandl, Tue 4:37 AM (0/0)

Organizing the At Large Membership. — Sotiris, Mon 8:03 AM (1/1)

re: organizing... — jandl, Mon 8:11 AM (0/0)

gTLD + ccTLD — KJZ, Mon 6:31 AM (0/0)

Comments and Position of Image Online Design, Inc. (long and unformatted) — cambler, Mon 6:18 AM (5/5)

I concur....way to go IOD!!! — Gregory Krajewski, Mon 10:57 PM (0/0)
Thanks, and good luck! — saskia, Mon 9:19 PM (0/0)
A MUST READ BY ICANN & EVERYONE!!! — Voice Of Reason, Mon 1:35 PM (0/0)
commons — fnord, Mon 8:28 AM (0/0)
IOD - .web — jandl, Mon 8:14 AM (0/0)

URL Reference to Image Online Design's Comments — cambler, Mon 6:13 AM (0/0)

MY OPINION. — Sotiris, Mon 5:39 AM (0/0)

LIMITING THE DOMAIN TLDs — AGA, Mon 4:45 AM (1/1)

I agree — sybesma, Mon 9:52 AM (0/0)

Historical Significance...The Economic Impact of new TLD's---PLEASE READ EVERYONE! — Gregory Krajewski, Mon 4:40 AM (3/6)

My Point was lost---It's the Economic Impact gTLD's will have!!!! — Gregory Krajewski, Mon 11:58 AM (0/0)
first mover — fnord, Mon 5:56 AM (1/3)

Nice.web will not be confused with nice.xyz — friedrich, Mon 10:06 AM (1/2)

misunderstanding — fnord, Mon 6:15 PM (1/1)

true ... — friedrich, Mon 11:19 PM (0/0)

I kinda agree — AGA, Mon 4:51 AM (0/0)

adding new domains — kasweeney, Mon 1:41 AM (0/0)

New TLDs — Robert, Mon 1:41 AM (3/3)

That makes no sense. — 410, Mon 3:21 AM (0/0)
Please list the frauds — Bond, Mon 2:36 AM (0/0)
I disagree with — Merlin, Mon 2:36 AM (0/0)

why do we want regulation ? — jefsey, Sun 6:20 PM (0/0)

TLD's needed, Orderly process required — bond, Sun 5:19 PM (2/3)

Oklahoma, here we come... — Venster, Sun 8:27 PM (0/0)
Who regulates this — layman, Sun 5:46 PM (1/1)

police? you said police? — jefsey, Mon 1:43 AM (0/0)

New TLDs - about the Sponsor/Operator — RGaetano, Sun 4:14 PM (1/1)

Q63 competence — stuartw, Sun 7:01 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - about the Proposed TLD — RGaetano, Sun 3:56 PM (3/3)

I (dis)agee — jefsey, Mon 1:35 AM (0/0)
Three, please — Venster, Sun 8:18 PM (0/0)
Q54 labels — stuartw, Sun 6:57 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Schedule — RGaetano, Sun 3:32 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Intellectual Property — RGaetano, Sun 3:19 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q33 — RGaetano, Sun 2:57 PM (0/0)

Um. . . Roberto. . . . Roberto!!. . . ROBERTO!! — 410, Sun 2:54 PM (1/4)

Please, no. — Venster, Sun 3:15 PM (1/3)

Good point. . . . or. . . — 410, Sun 3:17 PM (1/2)

Compromise? — RGaetano, Sun 3:24 PM (1/1)

:- ) — 410, Sun 3:28 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q25 — RGaetano, Sun 2:51 PM (2/2)

chartered TLDs — stuartw, Sun 6:51 PM (0/0)
charters — fnord, Sun 4:44 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q24 — RGaetano, Sun 2:38 PM (1/1)

example.e.com — stuartw, Sun 6:46 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q23 — RGaetano, Sun 2:37 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q22 — RGaetano, Sun 2:36 PM (1/1)

.com competition — stuartw, Sun 6:44 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q20 — RGaetano, Sun 2:36 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q19 — RGaetano, Sun 2:35 PM (1/1)

Theory and Real Life — Venster, Sun 3:06 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q18 — RGaetano, Sun 2:34 PM (1/1)

diverse registry vendors--yes!! — stuartw, Sun 6:38 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q12 — RGaetano, Sun 2:33 PM (2/2)

initial gTLDs — stuartw, Sun 6:35 PM (0/0)
registries — fnord, Sun 4:13 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q08 — RGaetano, Sun 2:32 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q07 — RGaetano, Sun 2:30 PM (1/1)

characteristics, continued — stuartw, Sun 6:28 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q05 — RGaetano, Sun 2:29 PM (1/1)

well, you could... — stuartw, Sun 7:06 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q04 — RGaetano, Sun 2:27 PM (0/0)

selection process should be clearly defined — dlee, Sun 1:59 PM (0/0)

DNS should die if business choose TLD's new assigment — davidaff, Sun 12:54 AM (2/2)

David - vive la France! — friedrich, Sun 3:20 PM (0/0)
Justice means governement means taxes — domainew, Sun 1:11 PM (0/0)

Hell is coming to domain world — domainew, Sun 12:47 AM (3/7)

I don't see the problem you see... — sybesma, Mon 10:17 AM (0/0)
Heaven and Hell! — friedrich, Sun 3:18 PM (0/0)
Um. . . er. . . WRONG. — WorldThoughts, Sun 1:01 PM (2/4)

Are you kidding? — layman, Sun 1:22 PM (1/2)

LOL — WorldThoughts, Sun 1:53 PM (1/1)

But — layman, Sun 5:13 PM (0/0)

I want to free you and, your Mother and mine. — domainew, Sun 1:18 PM (0/0)

Trademark, Charter issues — jamielove, Sun 12:42 AM (2/2)

ICANN has policies that undermine free speech, UDRP — Garry Anderson, Mon 9:58 AM (0/0)
yes but... — fnord, Sun 3:23 PM (0/0)

.museum - Further considerations — ckarp, Sun 11:09 AM (1/1)

Exactly right — fnord, Sun 2:40 PM (0/0)

MY RESPONSES TO YOUR POSTED QUESTIONS ON NEW gLTDs-My effortsof 2 days; 1 night & 1 "all-nighter"! — Nestor_DR, Sun 7:48 AM (2/9)

CONTEXT: RELEVANT CONGRESSIONAL DOCUMENTS -- U.S. CONGRESS -- HOUSE — Nestor DR, Mon 10:57 AM (0/0)
51 pages WOW! — Merlin, Sun 9:00 AM (1/7)

Come-on! — friedrich, Sun 3:06 PM (1/6)

FAIRLY AND SQUARELY — Nestor DR, Sun 6:50 PM (2/5)

A Monopolistic Viewpoint - Nestor — Garry Anderson, Mon 11:49 AM (1/1)

GARRY: PLEASE NOTE THE CONTENT--AND--CONTEXT, SO AS TO NOT HASTILY JUMP TO PRETEXTS OF *ILEGALITY* — Nestor DR, Mon 5:45 PM (0/0)

You are a strenuous person Nestor, but the .reg solution is imperative. — friedrich, Sun 10:39 PM (2/2)

IF THE POWERS-THAT-BE OFFICIALLY EXPAND THE ROLE OF ICANN RE TRADEMARKS YOU MIGHT BE ON TO SOMETHING — Nestor DR, Mon 11:56 PM (0/0)
PLEASE KINDLY SEE MY LATEST THREADS ABOVE: *CONGRESSIONAL CONTEXT* & *RESPONSE TO GERRY* — Nestor DR, Mon 9:06 PM (0/0)

To all those against new gTLD's — Merlin, Sun 6:40 AM (1/2)

SELF-INTEREST? — Sotiris, Sun 6:45 AM (1/1)

Now your obviously being — Merlin, Sun 6:51 AM (0/0)

New TLDs — NatVendExp, Sun 4:26 AM (2/15)

I have tears in my eyes ... — friedrich, Sun 2:03 PM (0/0)
I couldn't disagree more!! — Merlin, Sun 4:47 AM (3/13)

Response to Merlin — layman, Sun 1:05 PM (1/1)

are you cristobal colomb — jefsey, Sun 5:40 PM (0/0)

travel — fnord, Sun 6:07 AM (2/2)

No Ale! — domainew, Sun 1:05 PM (0/0)
Was not referring to you — Merlin, Sun 6:17 AM (0/0)

Consider this... — Sotiris, Sun 5:33 AM (1/7)

Global Facts call for more TLD's — Merlin, Sun 6:15 AM (2/6)

Country Specific? — ale, Sun 11:13 AM (0/0)
Bad analogy. — Sotiris, Sun 6:25 AM (2/4)

New gtlds won't hurt ... — friedrich, Sun 2:12 PM (0/0)
Quite Frankly — Merlin, Sun 6:32 AM (1/2)

Just one more point... — Sotiris, Sun 6:38 AM (1/1)

one more point — Merlin, Sun 6:41 AM (0/0)

Organizing the At Large Membership. — Sotiris, Sun 4:10 AM (1/1)

There is a site already set up for this purpose — jandl, Mon 5:47 AM (0/0)

Private Property Rights to TLDs - Be careful — jpalmeradns, Sun 3:24 AM (3/11)

I think you have a problem — jandl, Mon 5:50 AM (0/0)
Legal ownership of TLDs — jeffmarsh, Sun 3:46 AM (1/7)

Questions again — Merlin, Sun 3:51 AM (2/6)

Re: Questions again — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:00 AM (2/4)

Usage — Merlin, Sun 4:17 AM (1/1)

The courts will have to decide — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:38 AM (0/0)

Yes they can — jpalmeradns, Sun 4:06 AM (1/1)

Very interesting — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:11 AM (0/0)

How is it misused — jpalmeradns, Sun 3:54 AM (0/0)

Questions — Merlin, Sun 3:39 AM (1/1)

The others have no right to our property — jpalmeradns, Sun 3:43 AM (0/0)

TLD issues that should have been considered — adam, Sun 3:21 AM (0/0)

Question for IPLAWYER (and other lawyers): Trademarks and non-profit organizations — dotweb, Sun 2:48 AM (2/4)

Non-Profits and Trademarks — iplawyer, Mon 7:33 PM (0/0)
not a lawyer, but... — fnord, Sun 4:38 AM (1/2)

UDRP — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:54 AM (1/1)

UDRP — fnord, Sun 5:44 AM (0/0)

how is the ICANN going to prevent all of us to sue them all? — jefsey, Sun 1:14 AM (4/8)

it is time to enter the brave new internet world! — jefsey, Sun 3:38 PM (0/0)
Sorry, but this makes not much sense — friedrich, Sun 12:39 AM (0/0)
The Sky is falling....the Sky is falling.... — Gregory Krajewski, Sun 3:21 AM (0/0)
Your "scenario" is not logical — jeffmarsh, Sun 3:03 AM (2/4)

The Rush — jestiny, Sun 6:51 PM (0/0)
scripts — fnord, Sun 4:09 AM (1/2)

Yes, but... — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:30 AM (1/1)

however — fnord, Sun 4:56 AM (0/0)

The new TLD's and small companies — kingtodd, Sun 1:08 AM (1/4)

we the people — jefsey, Sun 1:58 AM (1/3)

I don't Agree — Merlin, Sun 2:57 AM (2/2)

.com versus .org versus .com versus .net versus .web versus .cc. . . . — WorldThoughts, Sun 12:47 AM (0/0)
100% agreed — friedrich, Sun 12:23 AM (0/0)

SYS gTLD proposition — jefsey, Sat 11:30 PM (3/9)

LOL - ROFL - TWADDLE — Garry Anderson, Sun 11:28 AM (0/0)
What if... — 410, Sun 12:25 AM (1/1)

I am afraid you actually fight your point — jefsey, Sun 1:26 AM (0/0)

Not — 410, Sun 12:05 AM (1/5)

I would certainly not tarr you !!! — jefsey, Sun 1:43 AM (1/4)

Thanks for the compliment, but here is where we differ. . . — 410, Sun 2:00 AM (1/3)

you are right but we have to go ahead in addition! — jefsey, Sun 2:22 AM (1/2)

Interesting — 410, Sun 2:30 AM (1/1)

there is far more room in sys that in com for serious project — jefsey, Sun 4:09 PM (0/0)

Has this just been an academic exercise? — fnord, Sat 10:41 PM (0/0)

WIPO Violation of ICANN TLD Rules - Open Letter to the Board of Directors — duffyking, Sat 9:58 PM (0/0)

Current TLD Dispute procedure must be sorted out first — duffyking, Sat 9:28 PM (6/18)

Agreed — friedrich, Sun 11:57 AM (1/1)

Again, Thanks — duffyking, Sun 12:08 AM (0/0)

To protect your domain name — Garry Anderson, Sun 10:46 AM (2/7)

Bad Idea — layman, Sun 12:40 AM (2/5)

Who is afraid of .reg? — friedrich, Sun 2:20 PM (1/3)

As I said — layman, Sun 5:30 PM (2/2)

dot REG is a certificate of authentication — Garry Anderson, Mon 9:47 AM (0/0)
Thanks for your (wrong) advices. — friedrich, Sun 10:45 PM (0/0)

You misunderstand - like most TM companies — Garry Anderson, Sun 1:56 PM (0/0)

Thanks but this won't work internationally — duffyking, Sun 11:48 AM (0/0)

I agree BUT — Merlin, Sun 6:49 AM (1/1)

If rules were laid down first this would work — duffyking, Sun 11:54 AM (0/0)

A GOOD PROPOSAL — Sotiris, Sun 5:42 AM (1/1)

ICANN set the rules so they should be involved — duffyking, Sun 11:40 AM (0/0)

Hear, hear! — Venster, Sat 10:41 PM (1/1)

Reverse Hijacking should be looked at first — duffyking, Sun 11:34 AM (0/0)

AGREED! — AboutMoney, Sat 9:37 PM (1/1)

Thanks — duffyking, Sat 10:02 PM (0/0)

New TLDs and Search Engines. — AboutMoney, Sat 9:21 PM (1/12)

Huh?! — WorldThoughts, Sat 9:36 PM (2/11)

"because he will get it first" ...do you realy think so ? — jefsey, Sun 12:03 AM (1/1)

Wrong - LOAN.COM — Garry Anderson, Sun 10:18 AM (0/0)

putobale — AboutMoney, Sat 9:40 PM (2/8)

Please read instead of repeating ... — friedrich, Sun 10:27 AM (0/0)
Answer — WorldThoughts, Sat 9:49 PM (1/6)

six is a registered trademark! — dotweb, Sat 11:59 PM (5/5)

SIX is trademarked!! — jestiny, Sun 5:05 PM (0/0)
SIX ... — friedrich, Sun 11:43 AM (0/0)
Should be unlawful to trademark GENERIC words — Garry Anderson, Sun 10:27 AM (0/0)
But it is trademarked for> — Merlin, Sun 8:20 AM (0/0)
If that is true.... — 410, Sun 12:09 AM (0/0)

What is the required structure of TLD's anyway? — chadlupkes, Sat 6:15 PM (1/1)

Maybe ... — friedrich, Sat 6:22 PM (0/0)

ICANN Should Not Accept a .union TLD — Dan Yager, Sat 4:59 PM (2/19)

Orthogonal gTLDs — jaylev, Mon 1:31 AM (0/0)
.union — fnord, Sat 9:38 PM (1/17)

What next: .church ? Who wants this ? — Venster, Sat 11:26 PM (1/16)

need for TLDs — fnord, Sun 12:41 AM (3/15)

Very true! — friedrich, Sun 10:04 AM (0/0)
Contradiction — 410, Sun 1:28 AM (1/2)

miscommunication — fnord, Sun 2:44 AM (1/1)

Where did we go wrong? <sob> — 410, Sun 2:52 AM (0/0)

TLD themes — 410, Sun 1:16 AM (2/10)

I think Gary wants to solve the trademark problem by introducing new open gtlds ... — friedrich, Sun 10:10 AM (1/4)

not exactly — fnord, Sun 2:09 PM (2/3)

Logical answer to all TM problems — Garry Anderson, Sun 2:39 PM (1/1)

fame — fnord, Sun 3:47 PM (0/0)

But ... — friedrich, Sun 2:24 PM (0/0)

differentiation — fnord, Sun 2:13 AM (1/4)

I am running out of titles for these posts. . . Heehee — 410, Sun 3:10 AM (1/3)

ditto :) — fnord, Sun 3:26 AM (1/2)

So three TLDs walk into a bar. And the bartenders says to the first one. . . — 410, Sun 3:49 AM (1/1)

...are you com, net, or org, you look so much alike — fnord, Sun 4:18 AM (0/0)

ICANN, WIPO, ARBITERS & INSANITY. — WorldThoughts, Sat 3:15 PM (3/4)

Worth Reading — Bond, Sun 5:02 AM (0/0)
Hear Hear!!! — LoonLady, Sat 7:12 PM (1/1)

No. — WorldThoughts, Sat 8:22 PM (0/0)

Can ICANN, etc. Be Sued? — Voice Of Reason, Sat 5:56 PM (0/0)

General proposel for new gtlds - please comment on it! — friedrich, Sat 9:57 AM (1/3)

Reasoned Response. — Garry Anderson, Sat 12:58 AM (1/2)

As short as possible — friedrich, Sat 4:16 PM (1/1)

Your Good Intentions — Garry Anderson, Sat 6:01 PM (0/0)

LIFE IS THE RISK TO DIE! ... AND .WEB? — friedrich, Sat 9:14 AM (0/0)

New TLD system...just a thought — vraj, Sat 3:46 AM (0/0)

.XXX - Let's Get Control of Pornography — pride5356, Sat 2:25 AM (1/12)

Just some thoughts. . . — 410, Sat 11:09 AM (2/11)

What is needed — GregInHouston, Sat 2:46 PM (3/7)

Giving them a place to go — chadlupkes, Sat 5:45 PM (0/0)
.SEX vs. .COM — friedrich, Sat 4:39 PM (1/3)

Frightening. — WorldThoughts, Sat 5:22 PM (1/2)

Hmmm ... — friedrich, Sat 6:01 PM (1/1)

.adult and .kids — fnord, Sat 8:55 PM (0/0)

Hmmm. . . — WorldThoughts, Sat 3:35 PM (1/1)

re: Hmmm. . . — greginhouston, Sun 6:58 PM (0/0)

Agree with 410 — Garry Anderson, Sat 12:08 AM (1/2)

Not quite what I was saying, though. — 410, Sat 12:43 AM (1/1)

Misunderstanding — Garry Anderson, Sat 1:18 PM (0/0)

Responses to Questions - Addendum — iplawyer, Fri 10:33 PM (0/0)

Comments on new TLDs from a museum perspective — ckarp, Fri 8:50 PM (0/0)

Responses to Questions — iplawyer, Fri 8:33 PM (6/7)

Disagree — JY, Sun 2:09 AM (1/1)

Sweep the database of .web AND .tv?? — friedrich, Sun 9:56 AM (0/0)

99% agree — moulden, Sat 9:30 PM (0/0)
Interesting — friedrich, Sat 9:42 AM (0/0)
Good Points — enforcer, Sat 12:53 AM (0/0)
You forgot to mention - from previous post — Garry Anderson, Sat 12:35 AM (0/0)
agree with IPLawyer — stuartw, Fri 11:34 PM (0/0)

Comments on introduction of new TLD — Collignon, Fri 4:14 PM (0/0)

Abolish TLDs instead! — GALund, Fri 11:50 AM (2/2)

True - TLD's are not being used for good anyway — scottt, Sat 4:18 PM (0/0)
Impossible — Venster, Fri 2:17 PM (0/0)

My viewpoint only — bigtymer, Fri 7:47 AM (4/13)

I wrote IANA for information concerning .web — Gregory Krajewski, Fri 11:25 PM (2/2)

Constituencies — fnord, Sat 7:37 PM (0/0)
Just something to think about... — freedom2001, Sat 12:19 AM (0/0)

My experience — bmitchell, Fri 12:51 AM (2/5)

My experience — 410, Fri 5:56 PM (2/3)

LIFE IS THE RISK TO DIE! — friedrich, Sat 9:13 AM (0/0)
yes... — freedom2001, Fri 8:06 PM (1/1)

And. . . — 410, Fri 9:06 PM (0/0)

i'll admit — freedom2001, Fri 4:43 PM (0/0)

Researches, analysis, discussions AND decisions are needed! Are you afraid? — friedrich, Fri 10:25 AM (0/0)
It is ONLY your viewpoint! — Garry Anderson, Fri 10:23 AM (1/2)

viewpoints — freedom2001, Fri 5:00 PM (1/1)

You Are Wrong — Garry Anderson, Fri 7:35 PM (0/0)

I am a member of the internet community.....I would like this addressed at YOKOHAMA!! Thanks! — Gregory Krajewski, Fri 1:06 AM (1/5)

I think ICANN means something else.... — Venster, Fri 2:14 PM (2/4)

. . . because. . . — 410, Sat 10:44 AM (0/0)
Long names — friedrich, Fri 5:38 PM (1/2)

IPs ? — Venster, Sat 1:55 AM (1/1)

Using numbers — friedrich, Sat 9:03 AM (0/0)

Domains and Trademarks, cont. — hmg, Thu 7:32 PM (1/1)

Told you so — Garry Anderson, Thu 11:17 PM (0/0)

another comment system — wessorh, Thu 6:17 PM (0/0)

EU domain? — Venster, Thu 3:50 PM (2/8)

Tld .eu — hias, Fri 10:25 AM (0/0)
Approval of .EU would be a slap in the face — cambler, Thu 4:45 PM (1/6)

It is a money making excercise — Garry Anderson, Thu 7:14 PM (2/5)

It's about something much different — Tadu, Sat 8:58 PM (1/1)

Still does not answer the question — Garry Anderson, Sun 8:58 AM (0/0)

Thank you, but aren't other new TLDs as well? — Venster, Thu 8:23 PM (2/2)

Yes - which is what I have said about .REG — Garry Anderson, Thu 10:42 PM (0/0)
Yes, the are — cambler, Thu 10:08 PM (0/0)

Realease a comprehensive list of TLDs aimed at niche markets. — bendudex, Thu 11:34 AM (2/3)

Flooding the market with TLD's — jestiny, Thu 3:15 PM (0/0)
New gtlds + new search engine needed: Search "name" + "trademark" + "international" or "country"! — friedrich, Thu 2:37 PM (1/1)

.REG — jestiny, Fri 9:36 AM (0/0)

PROPOSED 15 POINTS MOTION FOR YOKOHAMA -- CALL FOR INPUT — Nestor_DR, Thu 3:45 AM (0/0)

My Final Comments to ICANN......web/iod/icann/opinions/the future — Gregory Krajewski, Thu 1:58 AM (1/1)

Response. — 410, Thu 4:28 PM (0/0)

Heed this warning! — Merlin, Wed 11:55 PM (1/4)

Heed this warning! — enforcer, Thu 12:32 AM (1/3)

One of the threats — jestiny, Thu 9:07 AM (1/2)

Sharp analysis! — Venster, Thu 4:02 PM (1/1)

What ".net" is an abbreviation for. — 410, Thu 4:20 PM (0/0)

Whose Internet is it anyway? — Merlin, Wed 10:36 PM (0/0)

Let's ALL meditate on Jonathan Postel's picture... — Rebeka, Wed 6:49 PM (2/7)

Let's meditate on JON POSTEL'S words... — Sotiris, Thu 6:01 AM (0/0)
Good idea, as Bible texts are wiped off the 'net anyway — Venster, Thu 12:26 AM (1/5)

MY PERSONAL OPINION. — Sotiris, Thu 5:28 AM (2/4)

Corinthians.com — friedrich, Thu 2:19 PM (1/2)

Insane Arbiters at WIPO — WorldThoughts, Fri 9:36 PM (1/1)

TELL ME ABOUT IT — Garry Anderson, Sat 12:47 AM (0/0)

You should have corinthians.NET — Venster, Thu 5:42 AM (0/0)

ICANN is still viewed as a US company by many European registrars, — Rebeka, Wed 6:19 PM (0/0)

Who owns the root Servers? DO we need ICANN for new u-TLD's? — Rebeka, Wed 5:53 PM (2/5)

Or we can "all" join to - The Open Root Server Confederation — Rebeka, Wed 6:14 PM (0/0)
Uuups, i just found this! The SuperRoot Consortium — Rebeka, Wed 6:00 PM (1/3)

variations — fnord, Wed 6:32 PM (1/2)

I'll ask here.. — Mr.C, Wed 7:38 PM (1/1)

ICANN-US — fnord, Wed 10:02 PM (0/0)

Diamonds forever ... by auctioning gtlds — friedrich, Wed 4:18 PM (0/0)

ICANN..The Naming — Voice Of Reason, Wed 4:07 PM (0/0)

ICANN - we need a clear statement + immediate 1st-step-action and afterwards new discussions! — friedrich, Wed 3:36 PM (2/2)

URGENCY IS THE OPERATIVE WORD — Nestor_DR, Wed 7:16 PM (0/0)
ICANN — Voice Of Reason, Wed 3:52 PM (0/0)

In-Depth Analysis--ICANN & Forum Participants.. — Voice Of Reason, July 5 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)

Famous Marks Protection during Start-Up of aTLD — Dennis, July 4 @ 9:30 PM (1/1)

DNSO did not listen to Working Group C -- IN my opinion — Gregory Krajewski, July 5 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)

Question 46:�� Should there be Famous Marks protection? — Dennis, July 4 @ 7:42 PM (0/0)

Questions 41-42:� More IP Protection Needed? — Dennis, July 4 @ 7:01 PM (1/1)

correct — friedrich, July 4 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)

Questions 25-28: Welfare Program for the IP Industry — Dennis, July 4 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)

ICANN SHOULD MANAGE TLDs ONE STEP FURTHER — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 6:01 PM (5/14)

why not 256+ long domain names — jefsey, Sat 11:49 PM (0/0)
Why just .web?� What about .ftp and .gopher? — _Jeff, July 5 @ 12:48 AM (1/1)

SUSTAINABILITY AND RELEVANCE ARE THE STRATEGIC KEYS — Nestor DR, July 5 @ 8:19 AM (0/0)

And where does the money go? Charity? And what about the trademark solutions? Remain unchanged? — friedrich, July 4 @ 9:19 PM (1/5)

MONEY WOULD GO TO ICANN TO GIVE ACCESS TO THE MASSES — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 10:06 PM (2/4)

Well stated. — Sotiris, July 5 @ 3:51 AM (1/2)

Trademark cops — fnord, July 5 @ 4:50 AM (1/1)

Correct — friedrich, Wed 3:42 PM (0/0)

ABOUT .REG -- I THINK IT HAS TREMENDOUS MERIT — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 10:34 PM (0/0)

Stop and think — Naked Ape, July 4 @ 7:18 PM (1/2)

A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS WILL SHOW A POSITIVE NET VALUE — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 8:09 PM (1/1)

Further — Sotiris, July 4 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)

Change of direction... — Sotiris, July 4 @ 7:07 PM (1/1)

VERY INTERESTING :-) — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)

Questions 17-18:� To Promote Competition in Registration? — Dennis, July 4 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)

It is easy! — Naked Ape, July 4 @ 4:45 PM (1/1)

Maybe you will not need a book — Venster, July 5 @ 2:55 AM (0/0)

Auctioning domain names under the new gTLDs — Georg Panzer, July 4 @ 2:52 PM (2/13)

ICANN auction only way to avoid stampede on day one — interpres, July 5 @ 7:09 AM (1/8)

That was a hoot! — WorldThoughts, Wed 12:49 AM (2/7)

So your idea of equality obliges ICANN to sell diamonds and worthless beads at the same price? — interpres, Wed 10:39 PM (1/5)

TWADDLE - ICANN is NON-PROFIT MAKING Organization — Garry Anderson, Wed 11:41 PM (1/4)

Did you know... A non-profit is not prohibited from making money. — interpres, Thu 2:26 AM (1/3)

You may as well throw the money away — Garry Anderson, Thu 10:46 AM (1/2)

That's wrong with first come, first served! — Georg Panzer, Thu 1:34 PM (1/1)

My question is not answered — Garry Anderson, Thu 10:27 PM (0/0)

Trademark law,� again ... — friedrich, Wed 4:04 PM (0/0)

TWADDLE — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 3:43 PM (1/3)

Equal — Georg Panzer, Wed 10:41 AM (2/2)

animal.farm — fnord, Wed 4:39 PM (0/0)
Equality for all — Garry Anderson, Wed 1:19 PM (0/0)

Trademarks and Domains — hmg, July 4 @ 2:28 PM (1/4)

It is even worse with the ICANN UDRP — Venster, Thu 12:18 AM (1/3)

Nothing is safe — Garry Anderson, Thu 12:50 AM (1/2)

A Boycott? — Venster, Thu 1:08 AM (1/1)

Simple Answer — Garry Anderson, Thu 1:32 AM (0/0)

ICAAN Should Stay Out of the Trademark Business — bigjohn, July 4 @ 1:44 PM (2/2)

Agreed — hmg, July 4 @ 2:27 PM (0/0)
ICANN--Read bigjohn & this Please — Voice Of Reason, July 4 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)

ICANN - a majority of Internet users want some new u-TLD's! — Rebeka, July 4 @ 12:03 AM (1/4)

Substantiation? — Sotiris, July 4 @ 5:42 PM (1/3)

Most users will *hate* new gTLDs — Venster, July 5 @ 2:42 AM (1/2)

Will new TLDs cause confusion? — WorldThoughts, July 5 @ 3:38 AM (1/1)

P.S. — WorldThoughts, July 5 @ 3:54 AM (0/0)

Why no communication with the ICANN Directors here? — Rebeka, July 4 @ 11:54 AM (2/7)

We all understand your frustration — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 12:47 AM (1/3)

Reply — 410, July 4 @ 1:36 PM (1/2)

ICANN - Public Relations Exercise. — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 2:49 PM (1/1)

Some thoughts. — 410, July 4 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)

Rebeka. . . — 410, July 4 @ 12:31 AM (1/2)

Dear 410 — Rebeka, July 4 @ 4:07 PM (1/1)

Thank you. — 410, July 4 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)

Misusing trademarks for anti-competitive purposes — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)

IPC (Intellectual Property Constituency) and trademark infringement — friedrich, July 4 @ 10:13 AM (1/1)

AGREED!!!!! — Voice Of Reason, July 4 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)

Signs or Symbols? — Sotiris, July 4 @ 5:30 AM (0/0)

We must first clarify our objective — Galomb, July 4 @ 4:55 AM (4/4)

Hmmm...I like the idea...yet I disagree in principle — Gregory Krajewski, July 5 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)
Well Said — Layman, July 4 @ 1:58 PM (0/0)
A fairer representation. — WorldThoughts, July 4 @ 11:19 AM (0/0)
I question this statement>> — Merlin, July 4 @ 5:33 AM (0/0)

Trademark Scenario? — Merlin, July 4 @ 3:42 AM (2/4)

They know the Answer — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 3:13 PM (1/2)

Let me throw this in. . . — 410, July 4 @ 3:39 PM (1/1)

Very Important - Back to you — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)

But Some Love Problems — Layman, July 4 @ 1:42 PM (0/0)

My Question to ICANN. — Sotiris, July 4 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)

My comments (pleas read) to IPC's response.... — Greg Krajewski, July 3 @ 9:53 PM (1/1)

Takes time (quite a lot of it, seemingly) another kick at the I.P. Cat — dank, July 3 @ 11:56 PM (0/0)

Purposed domains: ftp, gopher, https — _Jeff, July 3 @ 9:19 PM (0/0)

What will IOD do now? — Rebeka, July 3 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)

There will be NO new uTLD's in the next future!!! — Rebeka, July 3 @ 8:33 PM (0/0)

IPC Responses to Questions on Introduction of New TLDs — IPC (Intellectual Property Constituency), July 3 @ 7:51 PM (3/4)

Critique of Response of the Intellectual Property Constituency — fnord, July 4 @ 11:13 AM (1/1)

Gary, I share your opinion. — friedrich, July 4 @ 12:52 AM (0/0)

Problems With Your Bowel Movements This Morning? — 410, July 4 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)
We know who you work for! — Merlin, July 4 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)

Internet God's - do they hear us? Esther Dyson are you here? — Rebeka, July 3 @ 7:19 PM (1/3)

Tsk Tsk — fnord, July 3 @ 7:34 PM (1/2)

Good question despite AUP — Venster, July 3 @ 7:51 PM (1/1)

Answer — 410, July 4 @ 3:31 AM (0/0)

"Registration" — Merlin, July 3 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)

Question 49 - 74 Comments Friedrich Kisters — friedrich, July 3 @ 5:28 PM (1/1)

Q68 — R�diger, Wed 9:01 PM (0/0)

Question 25 - 48 Comments Friedrich Kisters — friedrich, July 3 @ 5:25 PM (0/0)

Question 1 - 24 Comments Friedrich Kisters — friedrich, July 3 @ 5:22 PM (0/0)

Wiping the database clean — mediaevum, July 3 @ 3:34 PM (2/6)

You too can write a script! — Naked Ape, July 4 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)
Disagree — Crash999, July 4 @ 3:04 AM (3/4)

Disagreement — MEDIAEVUM, July 4 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)
Vested Interests, and Libel — WorldThoughts, July 4 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)
Fair and Equal — Merlin, July 4 @ 4:13 AM (1/1)

Crashing and burning logic — WorldThoughts, July 4 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

New gtlds AND NO trademark problems. — friedrich, July 3 @ 12:54 AM (1/5)

Too complicated — Venster, July 3 @ 4:53 PM (1/4)

Thanks for supporting my solution. — friedrich, July 3 @ 5:24 PM (1/3)

Are you a politician? — Venster, July 3 @ 7:41 PM (1/2)

Did you get the point? Well, well, ... — friedrich, July 3 @ 8:09 PM (1/1)

In whose interests are they working? — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 11:37 AM (0/0)

rosenthal, ulterior motives???? — Merlin, July 3 @ 6:01 AM (2/2)

who really is rosenthal — enforcer, July 3 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
Please stop personal attacks altogether. Thanks! — friedrich, July 3 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)

Opinions are only good if they are backed up! — Gregory Krajewski, July 3 @ 5:18 AM (2/2)

Preregistrations — Crash999, July 4 @ 2:29 AM (0/0)
Thanks. — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 11:18 AM (0/0)

JRosenthal — bartender, July 3 @ 4:59 AM (1/9)

If you had read... — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 5:06 AM (3/8)

Just a general observation. — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 5:43 AM (1/5)

My Position — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 11:12 AM (3/4)

pre-registration — fnord, July 3 @ 7:09 PM (1/1)

Good comment fnord — friedrich, July 3 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)

Preregistrations — friedrich, July 3 @ 12:36 AM (0/0)
Reply — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)

"Up" is NOT "Down." — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 5:18 AM (0/0)
You didn't answer ANY of my questions — bartender, July 3 @ 5:14 AM (0/0)

ICANN--Part 2 of Proposal--Beta testing — Voice Of Reason, July 3 @ 4:45 AM (1/1)

Comments — friedrich, July 3 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)

ICANN--A Proposal, Maybe The Answer — Voice Of Reason, July 3 @ 4:21 AM (1/1)

You know. . . — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 4:34 AM (0/0)

***ICANN*** Very On Topic — Voice Of Reason, July 3 @ 3:25 AM (1/1)

Yes, and. . . — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 3:41 AM (0/0)

ICANN steps in IANA shoes — Merlin, July 3 @ 2:42 AM (1/1)

Agree With Merlin — Voice Of Reason, July 3 @ 3:06 AM (0/0)

Why Preregistrations Shouldn't Stand — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 1:20 AM (3/27)

.web names — friedrich, July 3 @ 10:31 AM (0/0)
Your Wrong and you Know it — Merlin, July 3 @ 2:18 AM (2/6)

Correction — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 4:34 AM (3/4)

Laughable? — bartender, July 3 @ 4:49 AM (1/1)

Your Logic != Law — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 4:59 AM (0/0)

Um. . . — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 4:46 AM (0/0)
LOL — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 4:38 AM (0/0)

*****Merlin..**** — Voice Of Reason, July 3 @ 3:19 AM (0/0)

How Presumptuous! — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 1:59 AM (3/18)

More corrections — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 4:44 AM (1/1)

Reply to more nonsense. — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 6:22 AM (0/0)

Beam me up — fnord, July 3 @ 2:21 AM (2/14)

Mr. Brittan's "Trademarks" — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 4:53 AM (3/4)

To the trademark guru. — moster, July 3 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)
everyone's talking TM — fnord, July 3 @ 6:01 AM (0/0)
Talk about a left turn. — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 4:59 AM (1/1)

Let's go back one step... — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 5:11 AM (0/0)

Beam you down. — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 2:29 AM (1/8)

wishing .web — fnord, July 3 @ 2:41 AM (2/7)

Don't distort reality — Merlin, July 3 @ 2:51 AM (1/5)

rep — fnord, July 3 @ 6:25 AM (1/4)

Couldn't have said it better... — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 11:24 AM (2/3)

Amazing. . . absolutely amazing. — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 11:58 AM (1/1)

P.S. — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 12:13 AM (0/0)

we all have to belong to groups, haven't we?! — friedrich, July 3 @ 11:57 AM (0/0)

Well. . . — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 2:47 AM (0/0)

Agree With WorldThoughts — Voice Of Reason, July 3 @ 2:11 AM (0/0)

CORE Preregistrations — jrosenthal, July 3 @ 1:03 AM (3/6)

CORE and Roundrobin — friedrich, July 3 @ 10:23 AM (0/0)
Because. . . — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 2:10 AM (1/1)

I Agree With WorldThoughts — Voice Of Reason, July 3 @ 3:04 AM (0/0)

Yet again, I repeat myself, yet again. . . — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 1:31 AM (2/2)

Quite the contrary — WorldThoughts, July 5 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)
Repeating yourself — MEDIAEVUM, July 4 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)

No ownership of new TLD's - only licenses — Rebeka, July 2 @ 7:31 PM (3/5)

Rebeka, grow up. — bartender, July 3 @ 12:04 AM (1/1)

I agree, Bartender — WorldThoughts, July 3 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)

licensing TLDs — af, July 2 @ 9:45 PM (0/0)
lol — 410, July 2 @ 7:48 PM (1/1)

It costs nothing at all whatsoever, really — Venster, July 2 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)

where does it end? — skimming, July 2 @ 5:04 AM (1/1)

Hear, hear! — Venster, July 2 @ 6:41 PM (0/0)

competition — skimming, July 2 @ 4:13 AM (0/0)

No logical reason against .web TLD — Rebeka, July 1 @ 6:16 PM (1/9)

Not logical, but practical — Venster, July 2 @ 6:22 PM (1/8)

Inevitable — 410, July 2 @ 6:41 PM (1/7)

You put it better than I have :-) — Venster, July 2 @ 6:47 PM (1/6)

But — 410, July 2 @ 6:54 PM (2/5)

strong points — friedrich, July 3 @ 9:41 AM (0/0)
Would it look good? — Venster, July 2 @ 7:34 PM (1/3)

Huh? — 410, July 2 @ 7:50 PM (1/2)

No "Find" in your browser? — Venster, July 2 @ 8:05 PM (1/1)

No prob. — 410, July 2 @ 8:40 PM (0/0)

Question 1 - 74 — friedrich, July 1 @ 6:14 PM (2/2)

I Fully support Dr Mueller's comments---This is a MUST READ ICANN!! — Gregory Krajewski, July 1 @ 8:34 PM (0/0)
ICANN--Support Dr. Mueller Answers — Voice Of Reason, July 1 @ 6:27 PM (0/0)

Comments of Dr, Mueller, Part 5 (Questions 51-73) — mueller, July 1 @ 5:30 AM (1/1)

A point of disagreement — see, July 2 @ 6:08 AM (0/0)

Comments of Dr. Mueller, Part 4 (Questions 34-48) — mueller, July 1 @ 5:22 AM (1/2)

Avoiding to debate the basic question! — Venster, July 2 @ 7:28 PM (1/1)

Evidence of the restricted availability of gTLD names — mueller, July 3 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)

Comments of Dr, Mueller, Part 3 (Questions 19-32) — mueller, July 1 @ 5:17 AM (2/3)

Sound reasoning, please! — Venster, July 2 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
response to Dr. Mueller — fnord, July 2 @ 6:54 PM (1/1)

(more) chartered TLDs? — efs, July 4 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)

Comments of Dr. Mueller, Part 2 (Questions 8 - 18) — mueller, July 1 @ 5:10 AM (0/0)

Comments of Dr. Mueller, Part 1 — mueller, July 1 @ 5:04 AM (0/0)

n TLD for dot ngo — laypeople, July 1 @ 4:46 AM (0/0)

ICANN--My Answers — Voice Of Reason, June 30 @ 3:40 PM (1/10)

.web and TM — fnord, June 30 @ 10:40 PM (2/9)

Thanks! — Voice Of Reason, July 1 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
Almost correct on the ruling — cambler, July 1 @ 1:40 AM (2/7)

The Ruling — jrosenthal, July 1 @ 5:37 AM (3/5)

Big dictators around? — friedrich, July 1 @ 1:26 PM (1/2)

Oh puleeze — fnord, July 1 @ 6:13 PM (1/1)

Sorry — friedrich, July 1 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)

Your lace is showing. — WorldThoughts, July 1 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)
That is Your Opinion — Greg Krajewski, July 1 @ 6:03 AM (0/0)

Agreed — Voice Of Reason, July 1 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)

Let's keep our eye on the "ball" — Gregory Krajewski, June 30 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)

Please, this isn't the place to propose names. — cambler, June 30 @ 1:59 AM (2/3)

The point — saskia, June 30 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)
ICANN &, A Note to Christopher — Voice Of Reason, June 30 @ 2:52 AM (1/1)

IOD Motivation — Garry Anderson, June 30 @ 10:41 AM (0/0)

About a new TLDs.... — leoyun, June 30 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

This could be a global one... — manwithnoname, June 29 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)

*.sex — sil, June 29 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)

EASY Ways to make Money - Part II — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 1:55 PM (0/0)

TLDs — NuVector, June 28 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)

Concentrate on the Issues at hand — cambler, June 28 @ 5:10 AM (3/4)

Meta Question? — Venster, June 30 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
The Isuues--Serious Post — Voice Of Reason, June 29 @ 3:14 PM (1/1)

LET US VOTE ON IT — Garry Anderson, June 29 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)

Ditto — Greg Krajewski, June 29 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)

New Discussion Board for the Regulars — joshwa, June 28 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)

Safe TLD for children — P Mc Crory, June 28 @ 12:41 AM (1/2)

I fully support this idea. — friedrich, June 28 @ 12:55 AM (1/1)

IOD had offered to do this for free — cambler, June 28 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)

IOD .web TLD — icannifucan, June 27 @ 9:55 PM (1/4)

IOD ?? — Venster, June 28 @ 3:27 AM (2/3)

Say What? — Voice Of Reason, June 28 @ 5:19 AM (0/0)
Errors? — cambler, June 28 @ 4:58 AM (1/1)

Thanks for your honesty and openess! — Venster, June 30 @ 8:37 PM (0/0)

News Flash — Voice Of Reason, June 27 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)

Speaking Of Wearing Thin — Voice Of Reason, June 27 @ 5:17 PM (0/0)

ICANN--Someone Please Wake Me Up! — Voice Of Reason, June 27 @ 4:58 PM (0/0)

Some fresh new TLD's — Rebeka, June 27 @ 4:35 PM (3/3)

For all languages, please. — Venster, June 28 @ 4:04 AM (0/0)
Still fresh enough — Venster, June 28 @ 3:31 AM (0/0)
OK — Voice Of Reason, June 27 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)

dimensional and graphical data area — J.H.Ballard, June 27 @ 5:08 AM (0/0)

"ADU" domain — DavidG3276, June 27 @ 12:51 AM (3/22)

ADU Domain - would it work? — LWF, June 27 @ 9:23 PM (1/1)

ADU Domain - would it work? — DavidG3276, June 27 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)

Why have seperate TLD for this? — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 1:11 AM (1/4)

Why have seperate TLD for this? — DavidG3276, June 27 @ 2:26 PM (1/3)

Protecting Children — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 3:08 PM (1/2)

Protecting Children — DavidG3276, June 27 @ 9:51 PM (1/1)

Protecting Children — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)

Why this fascination with 3 letters? — cambler, June 27 @ 1:02 AM (2/14)

Why only 3 letters? — see, July 2 @ 6:20 AM (0/0)
That Was Good! — Voice Of Reason, June 27 @ 1:16 AM (1/12)

3 letters and more — Venster, June 27 @ 5:36 AM (1/11)

New gTLDs (.web, all that.) — worldthoughts, June 27 @ 7:56 AM (2/10)

Confusion! — Venster, June 28 @ 3:45 AM (2/6)

How to find Microsoft — friedrich, June 28 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)
Get Rich Quick — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 9:08 AM (1/4)

Let them have .reg — Venster, June 30 @ 8:44 PM (1/3)

Reason for trademarks — Garry Anderson, July 1 @ 12:15 AM (1/2)

Marks and Trademarks — Venster, July 2 @ 6:17 PM (1/1)

Same difference — Garry Anderson, July 2 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)

You forgot the most IMPORTANT one. — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 8:09 AM (1/2)

New gTLDs — wiredz, June 27 @ 2:20 PM (1/1)

Reply — WorldThoughts, June 27 @ 3:04 PM (0/0)

New top level domains — paulg, June 26 @ 6:52 PM (1/1)

To help you understand. — Garry Anderson, June 26 @ 10:38 PM (0/0)

New Domain Extentions — TonyyXXX, June 25 @ 7:22 PM (1/5)

New gTLDs will not do what you want — Venster, June 27 @ 5:17 AM (1/4)

Biggest Gainers — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 7:24 AM (1/3)

VERY TRUE! — wiredz, June 27 @ 3:18 PM (2/2)

Network Solutions / Monopoly — LWF, June 27 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)
It has merit - but — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 3:46 PM (0/0)

IP Concerns — Cyberfrank, June 25 @ 5:45 PM (3/3)

AND ANOTHER THING — Garry Anderson, June 26 @ 7:15 AM (0/0)
friendly acces? — friedrich, June 25 @ 7:34 PM (0/0)
Conflicting Marks — Garry Anderson, June 25 @ 6:49 PM (0/0)

Extending trademark law — friedrich, June 25 @ 9:53 AM (1/8)

Here's one suggestion — fnord, June 26 @ 1:18 AM (1/7)

Is not .reg required? — Garry Anderson, June 26 @ 7:41 AM (1/6)

TM labelling — fnord, June 26 @ 2:42 PM (1/5)

Equal rights to all — friedrich, June 26 @ 7:21 PM (2/4)

test — fnord, June 27 @ 7:40 PM (1/2)

Equal rights - again! — friedrich, June 27 @ 10:40 PM (1/1)

The benefits for trademarks. — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)

Corporate Propaganda and your question. — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 7:31 AM (0/0)

register now? — blade, June 25 @ 2:21 AM (1/10)

webtld.com & name-space.com - but waitasec... — joshwa, June 25 @ 6:22 AM (1/9)

thank you joshwa — blade, June 27 @ 7:10 AM (2/8)

Pre-registrations are CHEATING — wiredz, June 27 @ 3:24 PM (1/1)

That makes me laugh. — WorldThoughts, June 27 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)

Answer — WorldThoughts, June 27 @ 10:09 AM (1/5)

REAL Answer — wiredz, June 27 @ 4:24 PM (2/4)

IOD is a registry, not a registrar — cambler, June 28 @ 5:03 AM (0/0)
Think first, then talk. — WorldThoughts, June 27 @ 5:31 PM (1/2)

Who should think first, then talk ? — wiredz, June 27 @ 6:17 PM (1/1)

La la la la la la la. . . — WorldThoughts, June 27 @ 9:13 PM (0/0)

Dot .web company on hold---I can wait though...Not long however! — Gregory Krajewski, June 24 @ 11:19 PM (1/3)

No Need To Wait — Voice Of Reason, June 25 @ 12:37 AM (2/2)

SUGGESTION — wiredz, June 27 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
GrassRoots vs. Corporate Internet — jestiny, June 25 @ 4:30 PM (0/0)

Q75: Why weren't these question asked before? — Garry Anderson, June 24 @ 8:39 PM (1/6)

ICANN's Answer: — jestiny, June 25 @ 4:33 PM (1/5)

Isn't this consultation a big pretence? — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 12:47 AM (1/4)

Yep,..Here's Why — Voice Of Reason, June 27 @ 1:26 AM (1/3)

You could be right. — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 7:42 AM (1/2)

ICANN is a puppet — wiredz, June 27 @ 5:40 PM (1/1)

Ask yourself this. — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)

USPTO — Garry Anderson, June 24 @ 8:11 PM (1/4)

Question for Garry Anderson — fnord, June 25 @ 2:20 AM (2/3)

Very true — friedrich, June 25 @ 9:19 AM (1/1)

ICANN are blind to this truth. — Garry Anderson, June 25 @ 4:04 PM (0/0)

.REG as gTLD — Garry Anderson, June 25 @ 8:38 AM (0/0)

Highly unfair process — friedrich, June 24 @ 2:29 PM (0/0)

why not .eh (euskal herria, basque country) — xalbat, June 24 @ 12:37 AM (1/1)

but it exists... — wiredz, June 27 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)

how to use the http address method — J.H.Ballard, June 24 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)

Memoradum of Understanding/Thoughts and Questions — Merlin, June 24 @ 3:11 AM (2/3)

What is really going on ICANN? — Garry Anderson, June 24 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
ICANN--Pay Attention — Voice Of Reason, June 24 @ 3:26 AM (1/1)

Something's rotten--and it's not in Denmark — kevans, June 27 @ 1:26 PM (0/0)

Too much .web advocacy indeed ... — ozbilge, June 24 @ 12:22 AM (2/3)

Facts — Voice Of Reason, June 24 @ 1:19 AM (1/1)

Radically against .web — ozbilge, July 1 @ 1:08 AM (0/0)

eh? — 410, June 24 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)

locale — J.H.Ballard, June 24 @ 12:12 AM (0/0)

enternetional file form@ — J.H.Ballard, June 24 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)

ICANN...You Must Consider This! — Voice Of Reason, June 23 @ 7:51 PM (1/16)

Beauty.cc — Garry Anderson, June 24 @ 6:23 PM (1/15)

No beauty — Venster, June 27 @ 5:29 AM (2/14)

LOL — WorldThoughts, June 27 @ 10:12 AM (0/0)
You missed the points. — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 8:00 AM (1/12)

More splitting of hairs — Venster, June 28 @ 3:54 AM (2/11)

.web never will be nobledot.com's — friedrich, June 28 @ 12:37 AM (2/5)

Arguments — Venster, June 30 @ 8:55 PM (1/1)

.com — friedrich, July 1 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)

Nobledot.COM's — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 1:44 PM (1/2)

You heard it here first: .com dominance temporary — joshwa, July 1 @ 2:10 AM (1/1)

You answered your own question — Garry Anderson, July 1 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)

Hairy Man ;-) — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 9:34 AM (1/4)

The bottomline proves my point... — Venster, June 30 @ 8:52 PM (1/3)

The bottomline proves MY point... — Garry Anderson, July 1 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)

Theory, theory, theory — Venster, July 2 @ 6:34 PM (1/1)

Yes But — Garry Anderson, July 2 @ 6:58 PM (0/0)

Domain Names — johnbowling, June 23 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)

.WEB STINKS! — Rebeka, June 23 @ 6:09 PM (2/7)

Rebeka is a light one at this party. — jdb777, June 26 @ 7:15 PM (0/0)
!!! — 410, June 23 @ 9:03 PM (1/5)

.WEB STINKS! — Rebeka, June 24 @ 9:46 AM (1/4)

My, this is fun. — 410, June 24 @ 11:48 AM (1/3)

.WEB STINKS! — Rebeka, June 24 @ 2:36 PM (2/2)

Please ... — friedrich, June 24 @ 6:17 PM (0/0)
Um. . . — 410, June 24 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)

how to oblige sex� sites to use .sex TLD? — tri, June 23 @ 1:30 PM (0/0)

why .banc instead of .bank? — tri, June 23 @ 1:10 PM (0/0)

new TLDs @ www.dninet.net? — klemke, June 23 @ 11:50 AM (0/0)

A managed heirarchy — Amadeus, June 23 @ 8:58 AM (1/4)

Phrase involving word BREWERY comes to mind. — Garry Anderson, June 23 @ 10:48 AM (1/3)

Just fix it. — Amadeus, June 23 @ 10:55 AM (1/2)

You forget a few others. — Garry Anderson, June 23 @ 11:06 AM (1/1)

I think of them as a single stinking morass — Amadeus, June 23 @ 11:25 AM (0/0)

We Must Prevent People (Children too) From Being Tricked Into Going to X Rated Sites — JoeZeppy, June 23 @ 8:30 AM (1/1)

There is an answer. — Garry Anderson, June 23 @ 8:45 AM (0/0)

The Problem is No Longer a Problem — JoeZeppy, June 23 @ 8:05 AM (1/1)

What about other trademarks — Garry Anderson, June 23 @ 9:03 AM (0/0)

.WEB and ICANN????????? — Merlin, June 23 @ 4:43 AM (1/1)

Legal Theories — iplawyer, June 24 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)

Proposed TLD — Linc, June 22 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)

Suggestions for TLD — DocVegan, June 22 @ 4:05 PM (1/1)

Way too specialized — pchitescu, June 23 @ 2:37 PM (0/0)

new gtlds — harvest, June 22 @ 2:25 PM (1/1)

I wonder about having .info as a TLD... — JoeZeppy, June 23 @ 8:37 AM (0/0)

Prices For Exisiting Domains are Outrageous! — dr-rjp, June 22 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)

BOLD BOLD PRONOUNCEMENT — jestiny, June 21 @ 2:10 PM (4/7)

.TV NOT a ccTLD! — jestiny, June 21 @ 5:45 PM (1/1)

It is a country code domain for Tuvalu — Merlin, June 21 @ 6:11 PM (0/0)

.TV not relevant to this board — Merlin, June 21 @ 5:22 PM (1/1)

the law of attraction — fnord, June 22 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)

So what ? — pchitescu, June 21 @ 4:52 PM (1/1)

.us — fnord, June 22 @ 2:37 PM (0/0)

Internet abhors a vacuum — Stuart, June 21 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)

My personal sugggestions for new TLD-names with small comment — fremdehake, June 21 @ 10:51 AM (0/0)

"CommercialCompany.cc" should be the next to be sold — Domainhunter, June 21 @ 10:20 AM (0/0)

"Commercial Company" (.cc), Not a bad idea — Domainhunter, June 21 @ 9:32 AM (0/0)

The Addition of New gTLDs — Anne Gundelfinger, June 20 @ 10:28 PM (3/7)

Who do you BLINKING think you are kidding? — Garry Anderson, June 26 @ 9:20 AM (0/0)
some questions and suggestions — fnord, June 21 @ 1:17 AM (1/2)

.com names — friedrich, June 21 @ 9:48 AM (1/1)

cheap.com — fnord, June 22 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)

Does it really work? — friedrich, June 21 @ 1:13 AM (1/2)

Friedrich, You Are Right On. — JoeZeppy, June 23 @ 8:56 AM (1/1)

name.class.REG.country is the solution — Garry Anderson, June 24 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)

No names available - no fantasy available! But still: Let's .web be activated. — friedrich, June 20 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)

100 Billion domain names from 3 word combinations is no scarcity — jqpublic, June 20 @ 7:35 PM (0/0)

New Top Level Domain Shop — mbuckley, June 20 @ 3:00 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 18 — AIM, June 20 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 17 — AIM, June 20 @ 2:17 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 16 — AIM, June 20 @ 2:16 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 15 — AIM, June 20 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 14 — AIM, June 20 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 13 — AIM, June 20 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 12 — AIM, June 20 @ 2:01 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 11 — AIM, June 20 @ 1:59 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 10 — AIM, June 20 @ 1:53 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 9 — AIM, June 20 @ 1:46 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 8 — AIM, June 20 @ 1:40 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 7 — AIM, June 20 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 6 — AIM, June 20 @ 1:25 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 5 — AIM, June 20 @ 1:19 PM (0/0)

the questions - set 4 — AIM, June 20 @ 1:16 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 3 — AIM, June 20 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)

The questions - set 2 — AIM, June 20 @ 12:56 AM (1/1)

Q10-13: Lessons from intros? Openness? Limit # of new TLDs? — chewie, June 27 @ 5:24 AM (0/0)

The questions - set 1 — AIM, June 20 @ 12:47 AM (1/1)

The questions - set 1 — chewie, June 27 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)

How about "moon"...? — coldert, June 20 @ 11:35 AM (0/0)

".creditcard" (.cc) for eCommerce sites — Domainhunter, June 20 @ 9:57 AM (1/3)

Repeat — WorldThoughts, June 20 @ 10:02 AM (1/2)

A Marketing lie ?. — Domainhunter, June 20 @ 1:59 PM (1/1)

apparently — fnord, June 20 @ 6:13 PM (0/0)

Yes, let any top level option be open — Lauge, June 20 @ 9:13 AM (0/0)

Uh ..The landgrab just happened - .TV — jestiny, June 20 @ 4:52 AM (2/4)

Wow! — Lab, June 20 @ 11:44 AM (0/0)
Oh, please — WorldThoughts, June 20 @ 9:17 AM (1/2)

Sorry Worldthoughts — jestiny, June 20 @ 1:06 PM (1/1)

Could be. — WorldThoughts, June 20 @ 1:19 PM (0/0)

iodesign — iplawyer, June 20 @ 1:14 AM (1/2)

IMHO — Lab, June 20 @ 11:22 AM (1/1)

Facts — Voice Of Reason, June 20 @ 1:53 PM (0/0)

ICANN--Attention Please — Voice Of Reason, June 19 @ 9:02 PM (1/1)

There is method to their madness — Garry Anderson, June 19 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)

Some .Com holders want the continued Monopoly — Merlin, June 19 @ 8:49 PM (1/2)

Who are you protecting?????? — Garry Anderson, June 19 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)

Both of you — 410, June 19 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)

Suggest new TLD . news and more — jhkim, June 19 @ 7:39 PM (0/0)

ioDesign — iplawyer, June 19 @ 7:09 PM (2/18)

go for it. — fnord, June 20 @ 4:41 AM (2/12)

.net and .org taken — iplawyer, June 21 @ 12:05 AM (1/8)

and... — fnord, June 21 @ 2:24 AM (2/7)

Trademarking a Domain Name — iplayer, June 22 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
Law of Cyber Squatting — iplawyer, June 21 @ 11:55 PM (1/5)

caselaw — fnord, June 22 @ 2:13 PM (2/4)

Dot REG - you know it makes sense - common sense — Garry Anderson, June 23 @ 10:08 AM (0/0)
.Com not a Bar to .Web — iplawyer, June 23 @ 12:08 AM (2/2)

Common sense must prevail — Garry Anderson, June 23 @ 10:27 AM (0/0)
hyperlinks — fnord, June 23 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)

Tell me. . . — WorldThoughts, June 20 @ 9:38 AM (1/2)

P.S. — WorldThoughts, June 20 @ 9:46 AM (1/1)

.om — fnord, June 20 @ 5:55 PM (0/0)

SUE — Lab, June 19 @ 8:55 PM (1/4)

Lab, pal. . . — 410, June 19 @ 9:09 PM (1/3)

Dear 410 — Lab, June 19 @ 9:29 PM (1/2)

Man! — 410, June 19 @ 9:36 PM (1/1)

:-) — Lab, June 19 @ 9:39 PM (0/0)

current tld system is bad, adding more grows the problem not cure — edison, June 19 @ 6:45 PM (1/1)

Need online post office plus yellow pages — bylander, June 22 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)

The public doesn't really want new TLDs — jqpublic, June 19 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)

Ha! — 410, June 19 @ 8:31 PM (0/0)

adding more TLDs is a bad idea — jqpublic, June 19 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)

TLD's - "Since it ain't broke, don't fix it" — larryo, June 19 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)

.WEB gets my vote — Lotus, June 19 @ 5:24 PM (1/2)

Bravo! .WEB gets mine too — saskia, June 20 @ 8:09 AM (1/1)

Ditto (.web can do no good on the shelf) — Greg Krajewski, June 22 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

Yes! TLD's have been needed for a long time! — atreides, June 19 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)

new TLD's do not solve the certain problems — Mindcrime, June 19 @ 12:34 AM (3/4)

I said that in a news article — Garry Anderson, June 19 @ 9:45 PM (0/0)
The gain outweighs the problems — rs79, June 19 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
Your suggestions would raise fees! — atreides, June 19 @ 4:16 PM (1/1)

Depends on agreement — Mindcrime, June 20 @ 7:47 AM (0/0)

please give me many new top level domains.. — happyidiot.rec, June 19 @ 11:04 AM (0/0)

Movie TLD! — michielb, June 19 @ 9:06 AM (0/0)

extension .cc can work only if........ — Domainhunter, June 19 @ 7:37 AM (2/4)

Do U work for G.D.? — joshwa, June 19 @ 11:40 PM (1/1)

No G.D employee — Domainhunter, June 20 @ 9:53 AM (0/0)

cc already belongs to a country — atreides, June 19 @ 4:19 PM (1/1)

Misunderstanding — Domainhunter, June 19 @ 4:55 PM (0/0)

Utilization of the US Domain Name System — Simplicity, June 19 @ 4:16 AM (1/1)

www.nic.us — Simplicity, June 19 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)

.web vs .com (Round 2) ding! — Gregory Krajewski, June 19 @ 4:08 AM (3/5)

RE: Not Yet — Gregory Krajewski, June 19 @ 4:08 PM (1/2)

RE: RE: Not yet — Lab, June 19 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)

Slave — WorldThoughts, June 20 @ 9:50 AM (0/0)

Not yet — Lab, June 19 @ 9:50 AM (0/0)
My Vote — Voice Of Reason, June 19 @ 4:29 AM (0/0)

ICANN--Thoughts on New TLDs — Voice Of Reason, June 19 @ 2:36 AM (1/3)

Very well stated — WorldThoughts, June 19 @ 2:51 AM (2/2)

A Very Serious ? For ICANN — Voice Of Reason, June 19 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)
lol — WorldThoughts, June 19 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)

.WEB and 2 Models of Fairness in the World — 410, June 18 @ 5:29 PM (2/16)

Poor John — Lab, June 18 @ 7:52 PM (2/2)

Absolutes — 410, June 18 @ 8:03 PM (0/0)
Drink decaf — 410, June 18 @ 7:59 PM (0/0)

and now for the rest of the story — fnord, June 18 @ 7:48 PM (3/12)

lawsuit — 410, June 18 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)
!!! — Lab, June 18 @ 8:00 PM (1/1)

410, thank you. Stay online. — joshwa, June 18 @ 11:03 PM (0/0)

The Tale of Those Who Claim No Self-Interest — 410, June 18 @ 7:57 PM (2/8)

.WEB DATA BASE WON'T BE WIPED... — R8R, June 19 @ 1:49 AM (2/2)

.WEB is an excellent choice — saskia, June 19 @ 10:48 AM (0/0)
Maybe Not, Maybe So — Voice Of Reason, June 19 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)

disclosure — fnord, June 18 @ 9:20 PM (2/4)

trademark conflicts — friedrich, June 21 @ 12:13 AM (1/1)

.reg — fnord, June 21 @ 2:01 AM (0/0)

Civility — 410, June 18 @ 9:35 PM (1/1)

ARBITRATORS - doing ICANNs dirty work — Garry Anderson, June 24 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)

New TLDs — Orecic, June 18 @ 10:37 AM (2/3)

New TLDs is no remedy ... — ozbilge, June 18 @ 3:30 PM (1/1)

Explosion - You will not believe how bad it will get — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 4:50 PM (0/0)

Registrars don't keep the internet moving! — R8R, June 18 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)

Registrars should be responsible for trade mark infringement. — R8R, June 18 @ 10:07 AM (1/1)

Not Possible — Garry Anderson, June 19 @ 5:56 PM (0/0)

Domain Solutions - Not Push UpTLD but push Down Bottom-Level Domains — layman, June 18 @ 1:57 AM (2/2)

Approval — pchitescu, June 19 @ 1:39 PM (0/0)
Reply to Layman — Bartender, June 18 @ 5:16 PM (0/0)

maybe reorganize the current — J.H.Ballard, June 18 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)

ensuring the right ppl get there domain — tomiie, June 17 @ 10:58 PM (2/5)

Restriction = Failure — frank s., June 18 @ 7:24 PM (1/3)

regulation — fnord, June 18 @ 8:13 PM (1/2)

Regulation is simply a loosing proposition — frank s., June 18 @ 8:52 PM (1/1)

use of ccTLDs — fnord, June 18 @ 10:06 PM (0/0)

Dumb — rs79, June 18 @ 1:54 AM (0/0)

Just Say NO! — RMF, June 17 @ 9:19 PM (4/6)

Does Microsoft NOT sell its Windows98 as a profit? — friedrich, June 24 @ 2:59 PM (1/1)

What about free speech. — Garry Anderson, June 26 @ 11:23 PM (0/0)

Reply to RMF — Bartender, June 19 @ 3:26 AM (1/1)

Here's a list of available .webs — WorldThoughts, June 19 @ 5:05 AM (0/0)

Just say YES! — rs79, June 18 @ 1:50 AM (0/0)
Oklahomania — Venster, June 17 @ 10:27 PM (0/0)

Pre-registered .web domains — moulden, June 17 @ 9:17 PM (2/5)

more clarification please — fnord, June 17 @ 10:34 PM (0/0)
.web to stand? — Venster, June 17 @ 10:30 PM (2/3)

There is a difference — saskia, June 18 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)
Private TLD? — WorldThoughts, June 18 @ 12:30 AM (1/1)

Sure — Venster, June 28 @ 4:18 AM (0/0)

New TLDs make sense — trickstar, June 17 @ 8:16 PM (2/2)

montypython.humor.movies — happyidiot.rec, June 19 @ 11:20 AM (0/0)
new TLDs for easy reference? — Venster, June 17 @ 10:33 PM (0/0)

TLD for gamer-sites — Reser, June 17 @ 7:23 PM (0/0)

Information value of gTLD's — aquiles, June 17 @ 6:27 PM (1/2)

Clarification — aquiles, June 18 @ 5:07 AM (1/1)

life has changed drastically — friedrich, June 24 @ 9:35 AM (0/0)

IOD, .web, and a dose of Reality, folks. — WorldThoughts, June 17 @ 5:08 PM (9/21)

Gratulation, WorldThoughts! - Let me add a few thoughts of myself. — friedrich, June 20 @ 9:49 PM (0/0)
Well said. — Lotus, June 19 @ 6:18 PM (0/0)
Your Coments are Bang-on — frank s., June 18 @ 7:03 PM (0/0)
I totally agree — saskia, June 18 @ 2:43 PM (0/0)
Another Dose of Reality — R8R, June 18 @ 12:07 AM (2/3)

reply to R8R — Bartender, June 18 @ 4:43 PM (1/1)

reply to reply — R8R, June 19 @ 1:58 AM (0/0)

Solution — WorldThoughts, June 18 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)

IODesign can't handle it — Venster, June 17 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)

IOD database error — cambler, June 20 @ 5:35 AM (0/0)

IOD and .web — fnord, June 17 @ 8:59 PM (1/2)

Answer — WorldThoughts, June 17 @ 9:10 PM (1/1)

clarification — fnord, June 17 @ 10:06 PM (0/0)

.WEB and IOD — jmgraham, June 17 @ 8:11 PM (2/3)

WEB and IOD reply — mediaevum, June 18 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
A Reply to JM. — WorldThoughts, June 17 @ 8:38 PM (1/1)

.web IS being sold GLOBALLY — WorldThoughts, June 17 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)

BRAVO!!! A worthwhile read. — Merlin, June 17 @ 7:59 PM (1/3)

In short — Lab, June 17 @ 10:53 PM (1/2)

Great Thoughts! — jestiny, June 18 @ 6:33 PM (1/1)

How long has this been going on? — Garry Anderson, June 19 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)

.future good idea — roham, June 17 @ 4:41 PM (0/0)

no new gTLDs — Leafgreen, June 17 @ 4:12 PM (2/3)

If poeple can survive in a post AOL Internet they can survive enything — rs79, June 18 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
Brilliant Idea — roham, June 17 @ 4:37 PM (1/1)

Not realistic — Venster, June 17 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)

smart cards domains or drivers license — J.H.Ballard, June 17 @ 5:56 AM (0/0)

Sex, XXX — GoldenGriff, June 17 @ 3:56 AM (2/6)

.six not .sex — J.H.Ballard, June 18 @ 2:19 AM (1/4)

????? — GoldenGriff, June 18 @ 2:47 AM (1/3)

forcing a .sexodus — fnord, June 18 @ 3:27 AM (1/2)

.xxx good idea — iamlai, June 18 @ 9:23 PM (1/1)

.xxx — fnord, June 19 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)

.xxx tld — trickstar, June 17 @ 8:07 PM (0/0)

Stay with the convention — pbba12, June 17 @ 12:59 AM (1/1)

four letter domains are no accident — rs79, June 18 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)

How about ".past", ".now", ".future" ? — StephenKwok, June 17 @ 12:52 AM (1/1)

YES!! — wiredz, June 19 @ 2:18 PM (0/0)

Double-byte character set domain names — hsing, June 16 @ 10:25 PM (1/1)

big 5 — J.H.Ballard, June 17 @ 6:07 AM (0/0)

.ok domain — Smile99, June 16 @ 7:35 PM (1/1)

Yes, its good!! — wiredz, June 19 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)

TLD for Personal pages — pstefan, June 16 @ 7:28 PM (1/2)

TLD for private pages — trickstar, June 17 @ 8:10 PM (1/1)

personal TLD: .iam, .home — iamlai, June 18 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)

An easy way to find public information about countries — jumbird, June 16 @ 7:14 PM (0/0)

I think 4 new suffixes would be useful. — Humunculous, June 16 @ 7:08 PM (0/0)

.gay — iChris, June 16 @ 5:39 PM (0/0)

I think the only new TLD that is needed is.... -> — Nitschi, June 16 @ 3:51 PM (3/4)

Wait until ISO 3166-1 includes it. — see, June 19 @ 5:25 AM (0/0)
there IS .eu — roham, June 17 @ 4:43 PM (1/1)

Oh really? — rs79, June 18 @ 1:56 AM (0/0)

.firm would be much better — wiredz, June 16 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)

Registration fees — dsimonson, June 16 @ 3:29 PM (2/2)

Brilliant — rs79, June 18 @ 1:42 AM (0/0)
That is a silly suggestion — Garry Anderson, June 16 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)

Don't change anything — sirle, June 16 @ 3:18 PM (0/0)

Content Protection Domains — dsimonson, June 16 @ 3:09 PM (3/4)

Protecting children — Garry Anderson, June 16 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)
Useless — wiredz, June 16 @ 4:22 PM (1/1)

Who is really controlling ICANN? — Garry Anderson, June 16 @ 6:01 PM (0/0)

Not too late — kduce, June 16 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)

TLD — egalite, June 16 @ 2:52 PM (0/0)

Personal domains — Lyrica, June 16 @ 2:26 PM (1/1)

.me .mine .priv — Cubitus, June 18 @ 10:01 AM (0/0)

Use free lottery to award new gTLDs — Jodawi, June 16 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)

All.WEB "Registrations" are Valid!! — Merlin, June 16 @ 1:42 PM (1/1)

fff — roham, June 17 @ 5:24 PM (0/0)

Using only 2nd level domains in new TLDs — pchitescu, June 16 @ 1:33 PM (1/2)

no reason to restrict this to new TLDs. — confusedhacker, June 16 @ 2:00 PM (1/1)

Good reason to restrict this to some of the new TLDs — pchitescu, June 16 @ 2:28 PM (0/0)

What about Coca.Cola? — luma, June 16 @ 1:10 PM (1/2)

Various .Cola — pchitescu, June 16 @ 1:48 PM (1/1)

Or .Coke — gareth, June 27 @ 5:26 PM (0/0)

3 new TLD's — herwig, June 16 @ 12:58 AM (1/1)

RE: 3 new TLD's — wiredz, June 16 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)

Anything goes!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'd like to see .Z however — spycom, June 16 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)

.eur — jblaas, June 16 @ 11:37 AM (1/1)

.euro ;-) and some more serious thougths — Cubitus, June 18 @ 10:37 AM (0/0)

All pre-registered gTLD should be void !!! — jameshin, June 16 @ 9:16 AM (2/4)

Bogus — rs79, June 18 @ 1:41 AM (0/0)
First Come,First Serve is Fair — jestiny, June 17 @ 2:08 PM (1/2)

What is fair? Fair is in our heart. — jameshin, June 17 @ 9:09 PM (1/1)

Talk too much? — friedrich, June 21 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)

What about TLD based on languages? — stampf, June 16 @ 9:06 AM (0/0)

Yes to new TLDs — xod, June 16 @ 8:25 AM (1/1)

Very sorry, but this is b*llsh*t — Venster, June 17 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)

.xxx and other new extentions. — james_in_england, June 16 @ 8:06 AM (0/0)

HERE'S A CRAZY IDEA — joshwa, June 16 @ 5:13 AM (4/8)

trademarks vs. domain names — friedrich, June 21 @ 12:51 AM (1/3)

Trademark holders are being screwed. — Garry Anderson, June 21 @ 11:55 PM (1/2)

Trademarkholders beeing screwed ... — friedrich, June 22 @ 8:58 PM (1/1)

Fair is not the current situation — Garry Anderson, June 23 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)

That's ot crazy, that's just dumb — rs79, June 18 @ 1:38 AM (1/1)

Abuse of Trademark Law — Garry Anderson, June 18 @ 5:08 AM (0/0)

Crazy indeed — pde, June 17 @ 12:24 AM (0/0)
Not crazy but inapplicable — pchitescu, June 16 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)

How about ".inc" for registered incorporated businesses. — automorrow, June 16 @ 3:08 AM (2/2)

It is illegal - sorry — cjcx, June 20 @ 6:12 AM (0/0)
.ltd .ag .bv ... where to stop? — Cubitus, June 18 @ 10:45 AM (0/0)

All Answers in ONE post! — jestiny, June 16 @ 2:59 AM (0/0)

Poor solution to a non-existent problem — Captain, June 16 @ 2:46 AM (2/3)

Wrong — rs79, June 18 @ 1:34 AM (0/0)
Regulation — candie, June 16 @ 1:34 PM (1/1)

Read your history — rs79, June 18 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)

Will new TLDs make things better? — JB, June 16 @ 1:34 AM (0/0)

No New tld's but if... — pcm, June 16 @ 1:25 AM (1/1)

...we have to let's mae LOTS OF THEM — rs79, June 18 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)

ICANN know solution to trademark problems — Garry Anderson, June 15 @ 11:56 PM (1/2)

I completely agree. — smckoen, June 19 @ 8:23 PM (1/1)

Thank you very much — Garry Anderson, June 19 @ 10:27 PM (0/0)

New TLD's — msheekhah, June 15 @ 10:19 PM (1/1)

Mostly Agree — Garry Anderson, June 16 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)

No More Tlds PLEASE — fireball, June 15 @ 10:16 PM (1/1)

There is a crying need for new domains — rs79, June 18 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)

Just Say No to new gTLDs! — jch, June 15 @ 10:03 PM (1/2)

Sure, it worked so well against drugs — rs79, June 18 @ 1:25 AM (1/1)

and the damage done — fnord, June 18 @ 2:32 AM (0/0)

If you do make more TLDS then consider .SEX — donrae, June 15 @ 9:49 PM (0/0)

The global domain name system is obsolete. — logic, June 15 @ 8:59 PM (1/2)

characters — J.H.Ballard, June 15 @ 9:24 PM (1/1)

Non-ASCII characters — pchitescu, June 16 @ 10:30 AM (0/0)

New TLD Names — dachessdude, June 15 @ 8:50 PM (1/1)

.tld — J.H.Ballard, June 15 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)

My own experience — Thipdar, June 15 @ 7:25 PM (1/1)

org com edu net — J.H.Ballard, June 15 @ 8:55 PM (0/0)

Only correct reason for new TLD's is ... — charles_como, June 15 @ 7:15 PM (1/2)

macdonald.com — J.H.Ballard, June 15 @ 8:48 PM (1/1)

All trademarks can have their name — Garry Anderson, June 16 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)

Central problem is all the blackmail / fortune hunting — SME, June 15 @ 7:05 PM (1/1)

Free Trade — Garry Anderson, June 16 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)

The .xxx Domain — fishist, June 15 @ 6:59 PM (2/3)

Never Happen — cjcx, June 20 @ 6:34 AM (0/0)
Censorship — arc, June 15 @ 11:37 PM (1/1)

Freedom from pornography — candie, June 16 @ 1:40 PM (0/0)

open source domain names — J.H.Ballard, June 15 @ 6:48 PM (2/3)

You don't know what you're talking about — rubley1, June 16 @ 6:59 PM (1/1)

what is your point — J.H.Ballard, June 17 @ 5:39 AM (0/0)

.act — J.H.Ballard, June 15 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)

We need .MED — Medievalist, June 15 @ 6:39 PM (1/1)

agree! — iq66, June 16 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)

Money, Money, Money — rubley1, June 15 @ 6:00 PM (5/9)

misunderstanding — rs79, June 18 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)
Yes - why have so few realised? — Garry Anderson, June 16 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
bank — J.H.Ballard, June 15 @ 9:35 PM (1/2)

Domain Names don't use capital letters — rubley1, June 16 @ 6:54 PM (1/1)

RFC — J.H.Ballard, June 17 @ 5:43 AM (0/0)

Wrong — candie, June 15 @ 8:53 PM (1/2)

Not True — rubley1, June 16 @ 6:56 PM (1/1)

Does this look familiar? — Garry Anderson, June 17 @ 6:53 AM (0/0)

I totally agree with you!!! — charles_como, June 15 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)

Competition? — sean, June 15 @ 5:26 PM (0/0)

I think the whole DNS system will disappear in 4-5 years — Jabba, June 15 @ 5:19 PM (1/3)

I agree, BUT — Greg Krajewski, June 15 @ 6:25 PM (2/2)

It's my intelligent agent, not Amazons — Jabba, June 19 @ 11:16 AM (0/0)
Threats to domain name system — Venster, June 17 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)

No new TLD's — fortune, June 15 @ 5:07 PM (2/2)

We need new tlds — rs79, June 18 @ 1:16 AM (0/0)
I totally agree. — jch, June 15 @ 9:50 PM (0/0)

TLDs will not effectively segment — mowings, June 15 @ 3:35 PM (0/0)

The cure is worse than the disease — axlrosen, June 15 @ 3:29 PM (0/0)

Reorganization of current TLD's plus the addition new — candie, June 15 @ 3:13 PM (1/1)

I agree! — kodo, June 15 @ 4:34 PM (0/0)

It is our career! — jameshin, June 15 @ 2:48 PM (1/5)

Generic dot coms CAN'T own new generic gTLD unless they buy them! — Greg Krajewski, June 15 @ 9:13 PM (1/4)

I agree with U but... — jameshin, June 16 @ 12:04 AM (1/3)

I was thinking about registering... — moster, June 16 @ 6:49 PM (1/2)

Thank U for your visit — jameshin, June 16 @ 8:05 PM (1/1)

You have the best — Garry Anderson, June 16 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)

Any top level domain — bar, June 15 @ 2:28 PM (0/0)

Domains — tskybakmoen, June 15 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)

Enforcement of Different TLDs — rweikers, June 15 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)

re: top names — dezral, June 15 @ 1:39 PM (0/0)

I propose .sex (but not why you think) — Steven, June 15 @ 1:34 PM (1/4)

Agreed — shad, June 15 @ 2:09 PM (1/3)

.sex - Create Internet Zoning Laws — Greg Krajewski, June 15 @ 7:14 PM (1/2)

Zoning Speech Is Censorship — arc, June 16 @ 12:04 AM (1/1)

My Respone to FREE SPEECH and dot sex — Greg Krajewski, June 17 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)

on the revoking of "temporary" TLDs — valen, June 15 @ 1:32 PM (0/0)

Issues not mentioned — Paul Svensson, June 15 @ 1:26 PM (1/2)

.web registrants have a legal right to their domain names — Greg Krajewski, June 15 @ 6:12 PM (1/1)

I totally agree — saskia, June 18 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)

undifferentiated TLDs — wb3bdy, June 15 @ 1:24 PM (0/0)

gTLD's: 180day grace period: etc� .shop� .banc� .web� .eu : DomainMark ?? — ucann, June 15 @ 1:21 PM (3/4)

I Totally Disagree — Greg Krajewski, June 15 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)
No Sunrise Period - No Special Favors — kodo, June 15 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)
meaningless names — Paul Svensson, June 15 @ 1:31 PM (1/1)

SunRise Idea Ludicrous — jestiny, June 15 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)

new TLDs — gonar, June 15 @ 1:07 PM (0/0)

My answers to some of the questions — saskia, June 15 @ 12:43 AM (1/1)

Yes, ".web" should certainly be among the new TLDs — joshwa, June 15 @ 7:47 PM (0/0)

.banc? what are you smoking? — duck, June 15 @ 10:33 AM (0/0)

.museum — karp, June 15 @ 9:25 AM (0/0)

Trouble with lawsuits leads to a plead for using the ccTLD .US — Inez{R}, June 15 @ 8:47 AM (3/4)

Good Idea — smckoen, June 15 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)
Global-generic and country-generic TLNs - A proposal — mcromer, June 15 @ 4:08 PM (1/1)

Additional notes — mcromer, June 15 @ 4:26 PM (0/0)

Re: Trouble with lawsuits leads to a plead for using the ccTLD .US — valen, June 15 @ 1:35 PM (0/0)

New TLD for the other geek culture... — EWLloyd, June 15 @ 6:56 AM (0/0)

Trademark issues — alinden, June 15 @ 6:54 AM (1/2)

Trademark issues and a '.tm' TLD — mkurland, June 15 @ 5:44 PM (1/1)

Money is the root of it all — Garry Anderson, June 18 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)

7 Questions — kodo, June 15 @ 4:52 AM (0/0)

New TLDs — nwhitehe, June 15 @ 4:32 AM (0/0)

TLD extortion and uselessness of undiff'd TLD's — fuzz, June 15 @ 4:12 AM (2/3)

Don't understand how trademarks work? — rs79, June 18 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
Domain Appeal can't be legislated! — jestiny, June 15 @ 4:53 AM (1/1)

There is more to life that marketing! — kodo, June 15 @ 5:12 AM (0/0)

7 TLD questions — rustpuppet, June 15 @ 4:01 AM (1/1)

Bogus — rs79, June 18 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)

New TLDs — kodo, June 15 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)

.web TLD - - (PLease read--I actually answered all the questions) — Greg Krajewski, June 15 @ 1:41 AM (2/3)

IOD .web registry problems — jmgraham, June 16 @ 12:22 AM (1/1)

non-issue with regards to .web registrations — Greg Krajewski, June 16 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)

I agree — saskia, June 15 @ 10:43 AM (0/0)

.eu TLD — edward, June 14 @ 10:56 PM (1/2)

.eu domain — mreistad, June 15 @ 5:38 PM (1/1)

.EU TLD — stocholm, June 16 @ 9:13 AM (0/0)

No one is going to be happy ... so get rid of gTLDs entirely — smckoen, June 14 @ 10:18 PM (6/8)

The real solution is to get rid of TCP/IP and use UUCP — rs79, June 17 @ 11:56 PM (0/0)
The URL-notation is the problem — Jabba, June 15 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)
Duct tape on a broken naming system — bylander, June 15 @ 3:18 PM (0/0)
How quickly we forget .. the US made the internet., show some respect. — Largo, June 15 @ 3:08 PM (1/1)

How does nostalgia help? — smckoen, June 15 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)

Not a viable solution — edward, June 14 @ 10:49 PM (1/1)

Re: Not a viable solution — cutterjohn, June 15 @ 3:37 AM (0/0)

and another thing ;-) — smckoen, June 14 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)

The scripts problems — rophi, June 14 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)

Non-ICANN Approved TLDs — jbreg, June 14 @ 9:11 PM (1/2)

Additionally: internal domains ? — fl0rian, June 15 @ 8:16 AM (1/1)

Not a problem — rs79, June 17 @ 11:53 PM (0/0)

It's a bird, it's a plane... it's a Top Level Domain! — sh89, June 14 @ 7:29 PM (0/0)

ICANN board out of touch — jmgraham, June 14 @ 7:12 PM (1/1)

spot on! — kodo, June 15 @ 4:03 AM (0/0)

Free up new TLD's — ar, June 14 @ 6:33 PM (1/2)

Free up confusion? — Venster, June 14 @ 6:50 PM (1/1)

If you don't want them, don't use them — rs79, June 17 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)

Why? — Venster, June 14 @ 11:19 AM (0/0)

New TLD's. A waste of space? — kevbea, June 14 @ 7:50 AM (0/0)

New tlds — rs79, June 14 @ 5:35 AM (1/1)

Valid Point! ICANN pay attention — jestiny, June 17 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)

0 Fresh + 0 New + 1307 Old = 1307 Total headers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy