ICANN Public Comments Forum | New TLDs

This Comment Forum is now closed.

ICANN Public Comment Forum

Introduction of New Top-Level Domains

At its meeting on 15-16 July 2000 in Yokohama, Japan, the ICANN Board is expected to consider adopting a policy under which new top-level domains would be introduced to the Internet Domain Name System in a measured and responsible manner. This Public Comment Forum is dedicated to the discussion of proposals for such a policy. To review a paper summarizing the issues, please click here. Written comments should be submitted by 10 July 2000.

Comments Through Wed, July 12, 2000

Link to the actual doc where IANA transfered resp to ICANN---A Must SEE! — Gregory Krajewski, 3:01 AM (1/1)

Excellent! — bartender, 6:00 AM (0/0)

would the problem be different if TLDs did not exist? — jefsey, 2:24 AM (0/0)

how to get paid the non-refundable TLD application fee without neutrality breach — jefsey, 1:52 AM (0/0)

How Many People Here Can't Get a Domain? — Layman, 10:54 PM (1/1)

Thanks Layman — jestiny, 2:55 AM (0/0)

FORUM - meaning, a public meeting, discussion or tribunal — Garry Anderson, 10:45 PM (2/3)

everybody did — freedom2001, 11:56 PM (0/0)
That is the way the system works — Layman, 11:01 PM (1/1)

oh yeah! But nothing prevents people from being clever — jefsey, 2:01 AM (0/0)

"Trademark Squatters" — freedom2001, 4:34 PM (3/3)

You are right, lets count it together. — friedrich, 5:35 PM (0/0)
TRADEMARKS vs TLDs — Sotiris, 5:30 PM (0/0)
"Trademark squatting" — Publius, 5:24 PM (0/0)

".xxx" TLD is a bad idea... — Publius, 2:57 PM (1/2)

You hit the nail — Venster, 9:51 PM (1/1)

equal opportunity suppression — Publius, 11:05 PM (0/0)

Why do I register a trademark? To make profit? Why do I register a domain name? To make profit? — friedrich, 12:37 AM (2/4)

INTERESTING TWIST -- I NOTICED YOU'VE CHANGED YOUR POSTION TOWARD THE OPPOSITE POLE OF THE ISSUE — Nestor DR, 8:23 PM (0/0)
Agreed — hmg, 1:35 PM (1/2)

Right, but ... — friedrich, 5:24 PM (1/1)

MORATORIUM — Sotiris, 5:35 PM (0/0)

No new tld's until......cont. — hmg, 12:07 AM (0/0)

Yokohama meeting — RJGlass, 9:25 AM (0/0)

new TDL's — aligator, 9:02 AM (0/0)

My last words: Internet God's - do they hear us? Paul Mockapetris are you here? — fnord, Tue 8:03 AM (0/0)

GOD BLESS AMERICA !!!! INDEED !!!! (AND YOU ALL !!!) — Nestor DR, Tue 7:10 AM (0/0)

My Last Word. — 410, Tue 7:10 AM (0/0)

My Last Word. — Sotiris, Tue 7:02 AM (0/0)

The Last Word — Merlin, Tue 6:25 AM (0/0)

See you in Yokohama — cambler, Tue 6:16 AM (0/0)

The reason for providing complete information? — jandl, Tue 6:10 AM (0/0)

The last word: — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 5:59 AM (1/2)

Amen — jandl, Tue 6:14 AM (1/1)

Amen(tm) is a registered trademark in the uspto. — dotweb, Tue 7:51 AM (0/0)

Comments -- introduction of new TLDs — Jon Weinberg, Tue 5:46 AM (2/2)

Excellent post! — Gregory Krajewski, 2:11 AM (0/0)
Comments — jandl, Tue 6:27 AM (0/0)

Question for Sotiris — bigtymer, Tue 4:04 AM (2/11)

seemingly random mumblings ... (Bigtymer, very polite of yours ...) — friedrich, 12:10 AM (0/0)
Answer for "bigtymer" — Sotiris, Tue 4:27 AM (1/9)

My point exactly... — bigtymer, Tue 4:45 AM (1/8)

Really? — Sotiris, Tue 4:59 AM (1/7)

Chartered TLDs would not require rigorous ICANN enforcement to work if.... — Galomb, Tue 3:54 AM (0/0)

Worldwide swindle. — Sotiris, Tue 3:39 AM (0/0)

The term "cybersquatters" — Sotiris, Tue 3:11 AM (1/4)

Get your facts straight — bigtymer, Tue 3:45 AM (2/3)

Well, then your facts aren't straight either — cambler, Tue 6:56 AM (1/1)

What about people who register A TRADEMARK in order TO SELL IT AT A HIGHER VALUE LATER ON? — friedrich, 12:05 AM (0/0)

Read the news sometime... — Sotiris, Tue 4:34 AM (0/0)

No New TLDs, Several New TLDs, Dozens New TLDs, or Unlimited TLDs? — layman, Tue 3:02 AM (0/0)

How nice. — Sotiris, Tue 2:53 AM (0/0)

Auctioning Domain Names for the Common Good — achander, Tue 2:35 AM (4/21)

A Very Good Suggestion from achander — layman, Tue 3:26 AM (2/13)

Of course — bigtymer, Tue 4:21 AM (2/11)

I beg to differ........................................ — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 5:15 AM (1/1)

No Freedom of Speech here... — Sotiris, Tue 5:19 AM (0/0)

So you have no vested interests. . . — WorldThoughts, Tue 4:42 AM (1/8)

Great analogies, but... — bigtymer, Tue 4:58 AM (5/7)

It had the legal right to do so from at least July - December 1996 ... — friedrich, 11:57 AM (0/0)
You wrong littletymer — Merlin, Tue 5:06 AM (0/0)
Much as I hate to admit it... — Sotiris, Tue 5:03 AM (0/0)
link — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 5:02 AM (0/0)
Not even worth arguing about — cambler, Tue 5:02 AM (1/2)

Argue it in court — bigtymer, Tue 5:09 AM (1/1)

In Court — cambler, Tue 5:37 AM (0/0)

The Right of Speech. The Right to Speak Loudly. — 410, Tue 4:06 AM (0/0)

ridiculous — Merlin, Tue 3:19 AM (1/1)

You know there's a problem, — Sotiris, Tue 3:26 AM (0/0)

Finite Resource? Hardly. — cambler, Tue 2:57 AM (1/1)

The only finite thing when it comes to TLDs is a wilful "lack of imagination" — Sotiris, Tue 3:03 AM (0/0)

A "professor" of law is what you are, the reality is a different matter however... — Sotiris, Tue 2:45 AM (2/2)

Fair / Unfair — friedrich, Tue 2:54 AM (0/0)
Too bad they don't apply your theories when it comes to FOOD production and distribution. — Sotiris, Tue 2:50 AM (0/0)

No new tld's until...... — hmg, Tue 2:19 AM (2/2)

In reply — hmg, 11:58 AM (0/0)
We are serious... — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 2:55 AM (0/0)

AND THIS TOO! — Sotiris, Tue 2:15 AM (1/1)

one question. — Sotiris, Tue 2:23 AM (0/0)

GET A LOAD OF THIS... — Sotiris, Tue 2:08 AM (0/0)

the future is obviously http://johnny-junky.smith — jefsey, Tue 1:33 AM (1/3)

About the Phone Number — layman, Tue 3:43 AM (1/2)

Calling Home — WorldThoughts, Tue 4:18 AM (1/1)

The 63 character limit is technically imposed, not mandated — cambler, Tue 4:45 AM (0/0)

AT&T�s Comments to ICANN�s June 13, 2000 Request for Comment — Nakia, Tue 12:40 AM (6/24)

Conflict of Interest? — Merlin, Tue 2:43 AM (1/3)

Grow Up — bigtymer, Tue 4:11 AM (1/2)

My Rights — Merlin, Tue 4:36 AM (1/1)

More insults... — bigtymer, Tue 5:00 AM (0/0)

ATT your a Joke — Merlin, Tue 2:20 AM (2/2)

Nice argument... — bigtymer, Tue 2:28 AM (0/0)
In defense of... — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 2:23 AM (0/0)

are we talking about the wame world - happy you are late — jefsey, Tue 2:20 AM (0/0)
DAVID AND GOLIATH SHAKE HANDS :-) [ ATT, A GIANT, AND MYSELF, A PLAIN FOLK, HAVE THE SAME ANSWERS] — Nestor DR, Tue 2:14 AM (2/4)

Surprise, surprise, ... — friedrich, Tue 2:24 AM (1/2)

THINKING IS MORE VALUABLE . . . — Nestor DR, Tue 2:41 AM (1/1)

Your subject line is correct. — friedrich, Tue 2:43 AM (0/0)

:) — bigtymer, Tue 2:19 AM (0/0)

Where was AT&T before on this board---discussing the issues — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 1:11 AM (1/9)

I understand, but... — bigtymer, Tue 1:39 AM (3/8)

Are you kidding? — WorldThoughts, Tue 1:59 AM (0/0)
However..... — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 1:54 AM (0/0)
If you think big companies consulted their employees... — cambler, Tue 1:47 AM (1/5)

Misunderstanding — bigtymer, Tue 1:55 AM (1/4)

Excuse me? — cambler, Tue 2:00 AM (1/3)

Your Position Statement — bigtymer, Tue 2:14 AM (1/2)

Pretty much, yes... — cambler, Tue 2:23 AM (1/1)

I won't... — bigtymer, Tue 2:30 AM (0/0)

Bible or Bill? — Venster, Tue 1:10 AM (0/0)

IT IS TIME TO TELL THE TRUTH! — friedrich, Tue 12:22 AM (0/0)

Another reason to introduce new TLDs — EA, Tue 12:16 AM (0/0)

comments — kent, Mon 11:59 PM (0/0)

On behalf of the Private Sector Working Group on Trademarks and Domain Names: (PSWG) : — Nakia, Mon 11:55 PM (2/2)

More Nonsense — Merlin, Tue 1:31 AM (0/0)
I disagree — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 12:56 AM (0/0)

Comments regarding 51 to 74 questions about new gTLDs — vany_martinez, Mon 11:39 PM (0/0)

REGISTER.COM COMMENTS REGARDING NEW TLDS — register.com, Mon 11:22 PM (1/2)

Network Solution, and Register.com cannot be the new registrar's... — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 3:21 AM (1/1)

Registry vs. registrar — bigtymer, Tue 5:14 AM (0/0)

Comments regarding 1 to 50 questions about new gTLDs — vany_martinez, Mon 11:21 PM (0/0)

SBA's new gTLDs Comments — Eric Menge, Mon 10:57 PM (1/1)

I second these comments — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 1:18 AM (0/0)

consistency — nascent, Mon 10:19 PM (0/0)

New Top Level Domains — dharrington, Mon 8:09 PM (0/0)

Tucows' Response to Expansion of TLDs — tmdenton, Mon 8:08 PM (0/0)

SBLC comments on Famous Trademark Protection — mkpage, Mon 7:54 PM (1/1)

Short, but well thought! — friedrich, Tue 12:42 AM (0/0)

NEW TOP LEVEL DOMAINS — Wayne krut, Mon 7:54 PM (1/15)

Round Robin System — freedom2001, Mon 8:04 PM (1/14)

Round Robin — friedrich, Tue 12:33 AM (1/13)

A good idea actually... — bigtymer, Tue 1:30 AM (1/12)

Mixed? — friedrich, Tue 1:43 AM (1/11)

Don't think... — bigtymer, Tue 2:00 AM (2/10)

And what of registrations in .web, already taken? — cambler, Tue 2:28 AM (1/5)

The sticky subject of preregistrations — bigtymer, Tue 2:39 AM (1/4)

Simple — cambler, Tue 2:48 AM (1/3)

Well... — bigtymer, Tue 3:36 AM (2/2)

Don't kill off IANA yet...and those pioneers who paved the way — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 4:56 AM (0/0)
bigtymer..Not Correct Entirely,--Here's Why — Voice Of Reason, Tue 4:11 AM (0/0)

... only that every card bears my name ... — friedrich, Tue 2:13 AM (2/3)

a way of having my name on many cards — jefsey, 2:20 AM (0/0)
*sigh* — bigtymer, Tue 2:23 AM (1/1)

Correct statement — friedrich, Tue 2:37 AM (0/0)

MORE WIPO INSANITY — 410, Mon 7:46 PM (2/2)

Where was this Pop Star Sting 5 years ago? — Venster, Tue 12:30 AM (0/0)
P.S. — 410, Tue 12:09 AM (0/0)

new gTLDs — s_bradner, Mon 6:17 PM (2/10)

All Web Site owners are Very concerned with the introduction of new TLD's — jlandrum, Mon 7:07 PM (2/8)

... and to .net or .org owners? — friedrich, Tue 12:00 AM (0/0)
ADDRESS MY POINTS, JACK! — 410, Mon 7:20 PM (2/6)

No duplicating? — Venster, Tue 12:47 AM (1/1)

reply — 410, Tue 1:41 AM (0/0)

410--You obviously did not spend a great deal of money to promote the name of your website! — jlandrum , Mon 9:42 PM (3/3)

I am one of those small business owners — jandl, Tue 5:41 AM (0/0)
Three mice get a cheese ... — friedrich, Tue 12:08 AM (0/0)
Your expense. Possible benefits for your. — 410, Mon 10:01 PM (0/0)

Hey, look — 410, Mon 6:25 PM (0/0)

Replies to the 74 Questions regarding new TLDs — WSchueller, Mon 5:49 PM (0/0)

New TLDs — mshamim, Mon 5:24 PM (0/0)

Replies to the 74 Questions (ii) — John Lewis, Mon 5:16 PM (0/0)

Replies to the 74 Questions (i) — John Lewis, Mon 5:14 PM (0/0)

eNom Expression of Interest — freedom2001, Mon 4:59 PM (0/0)

IMPORTANT COMMENTS FOR ICANN MEMBERS — jlandrum, Mon 3:05 PM (5/5)

sunrise, daybreak - it's all bunk — jandl, Tue 5:26 AM (0/0)
No new grocery store in my street please, ... — friedrich, Mon 10:29 PM (0/0)
I AM A Dot COM Holder--I WANT NEW gTLDs — Voice Of Reason, Mon 3:39 PM (0/0)
It is not fair to only give preference to famous marks - it is illegal — Garry Anderson, Mon 3:21 PM (0/0)
Repeating points. — 410, Mon 3:19 PM (0/0)

Won't new tld's create possible trademark violations? — highvis, Mon 2:59 PM (3/4)

confusion? — jandl, Tue 5:11 AM (0/0)
Nonsense — 410, Mon 3:40 PM (1/1)

You know. . . — 410, Mon 4:12 PM (0/0)

See below - THIS has to be sorted first...... — Garry Anderson, Mon 3:01 PM (0/0)

ground rules for new TLDs:copyright industry perspective — sjmetalitz, Mon 2:56 PM (2/9)

my response to this — fnord, Mon 6:38 PM (0/0)
Infringement Minimization - You are a Joke! — Garry Anderson, Mon 3:15 PM (1/7)

Insults... — freedom2001, Mon 4:42 PM (3/6)

I agree---Let's agrue the issues...not each other — Gregory Krajewski, Tue 1:20 AM (0/0)
Politeness is not always correctness! — friedrich, Mon 10:20 PM (0/0)
Get Your Facts Right — Garry Anderson, Mon 5:38 PM (1/3)

Excuse me — freedom2001, Mon 6:15 PM (1/2)

They stop free speech, fan sites and take away domains — Garry Anderson, Mon 7:58 PM (1/1)

What don't you understand? — freedom2001, Mon 8:13 PM (0/0)

Purposes for tld's — highvis, Mon 2:09 PM (1/1)

nw tdls — aligator, 24 minutes ago (0/0)

Famous Trademark Protection — wanda, Mon 2:01 PM (0/0)

POC Answers to ICANN questions on new TLDs — poc, Mon 1:51 PM (2/2)

EuroInternet Supports POC Answers — javier, 11:58 AM (0/0)
Who is "The POC?" — cambler, Tue 2:14 AM (0/0)

proposing new TLD — wanda, Mon 1:47 PM (0/0)

new TLD's proposals — Jerome, Mon 12:39 AM (0/0)

THIS has to be sorted first, else what is the point of more TLDs? — Garry Anderson, Mon 10:52 AM (1/2)

ICANN - THIS MATTER MUST BE ADDRESSED, AND DECISIVELY! — Sotiris, Mon 1:13 PM (1/1)

Plus ca change... — fnord, Tue 5:49 AM (0/0)

Comment on New Top Level Domains — Tsubo, Mon 10:38 AM (0/0)

Adding TLDs will help with several problems... — sybesma, Mon 9:36 AM (1/1)

Give the sex and xxx sites a tld — markuscoral, Mon 9:01 PM (0/0)

New TLD's, TM's, WIPO and UDRP — jandl, Mon 7:10 AM (8/12)

I agree — saskia, Mon 9:11 PM (0/0)
AGREE — Voice Of Reason, Mon 3:09 PM (0/0)
Wow---No one has said it better — Gregory Krajewski, Mon 12:10 AM (0/0)
UDRP - legalised theft? I CERTAINLY think so. — Garry Anderson, Mon 11:26 AM (0/0)
Excellent comment! — friedrich, Mon 10:23 AM (0/0)
Excellent post — fnord, Mon 8:43 AM (1/2)

Link to webcast and remote participation — saskia, Mon 9:08 PM (1/1)

OT Thanks, I think — fnord, Tue 2:39 AM (0/0)

Absolute agreement here — WorldThoughts, Mon 8:22 AM (1/1)

who says not? — jandl, Tue 4:37 AM (0/0)

Organizing the At Large Membership. — Sotiris, Mon 8:03 AM (1/1)

re: organizing... — jandl, Mon 8:11 AM (0/0)

gTLD + ccTLD — KJZ, Mon 6:31 AM (0/0)

Comments and Position of Image Online Design, Inc. (long and unformatted) — cambler, Mon 6:18 AM (5/5)

I concur....way to go IOD!!! — Gregory Krajewski, Mon 10:57 PM (0/0)
Thanks, and good luck! — saskia, Mon 9:19 PM (0/0)
A MUST READ BY ICANN & EVERYONE!!! — Voice Of Reason, Mon 1:35 PM (0/0)
commons — fnord, Mon 8:28 AM (0/0)
IOD - .web — jandl, Mon 8:14 AM (0/0)

URL Reference to Image Online Design's Comments — cambler, Mon 6:13 AM (0/0)

MY OPINION. — Sotiris, Mon 5:39 AM (0/0)

LIMITING THE DOMAIN TLDs — AGA, Mon 4:45 AM (1/1)

I agree — sybesma, Mon 9:52 AM (0/0)

Historical Significance...The Economic Impact of new TLD's---PLEASE READ EVERYONE! — Gregory Krajewski, Mon 4:40 AM (3/6)

My Point was lost---It's the Economic Impact gTLD's will have!!!! — Gregory Krajewski, Mon 11:58 AM (0/0)
first mover — fnord, Mon 5:56 AM (1/3)

Nice.web will not be confused with nice.xyz — friedrich, Mon 10:06 AM (1/2)

misunderstanding — fnord, Mon 6:15 PM (1/1)

true ... — friedrich, Mon 11:19 PM (0/0)

I kinda agree — AGA, Mon 4:51 AM (0/0)

adding new domains — kasweeney, Mon 1:41 AM (0/0)

New TLDs — Robert, Mon 1:41 AM (3/3)

That makes no sense. — 410, Mon 3:21 AM (0/0)
Please list the frauds — Bond, Mon 2:36 AM (0/0)
I disagree with — Merlin, Mon 2:36 AM (0/0)

why do we want regulation ? — jefsey, Sun 6:20 PM (0/0)

TLD's needed, Orderly process required — bond, Sun 5:19 PM (2/3)

Oklahoma, here we come... — Venster, Sun 8:27 PM (0/0)
Who regulates this — layman, Sun 5:46 PM (1/1)

police? you said police? — jefsey, Mon 1:43 AM (0/0)

New TLDs - about the Sponsor/Operator — RGaetano, Sun 4:14 PM (1/1)

Q63 competence — stuartw, Sun 7:01 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - about the Proposed TLD — RGaetano, Sun 3:56 PM (3/3)

I (dis)agee — jefsey, Mon 1:35 AM (0/0)
Three, please — Venster, Sun 8:18 PM (0/0)
Q54 labels — stuartw, Sun 6:57 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Schedule — RGaetano, Sun 3:32 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Intellectual Property — RGaetano, Sun 3:19 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q33 — RGaetano, Sun 2:57 PM (0/0)

Um. . . Roberto. . . . Roberto!!. . . ROBERTO!! — 410, Sun 2:54 PM (1/4)

Please, no. — Venster, Sun 3:15 PM (1/3)

Good point. . . . or. . . — 410, Sun 3:17 PM (1/2)

Compromise? — RGaetano, Sun 3:24 PM (1/1)

:- ) — 410, Sun 3:28 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q25 — RGaetano, Sun 2:51 PM (2/2)

chartered TLDs — stuartw, Sun 6:51 PM (0/0)
charters — fnord, Sun 4:44 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q24 — RGaetano, Sun 2:38 PM (1/1)

example.e.com — stuartw, Sun 6:46 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q23 — RGaetano, Sun 2:37 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q22 — RGaetano, Sun 2:36 PM (1/1)

.com competition — stuartw, Sun 6:44 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q20 — RGaetano, Sun 2:36 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q19 — RGaetano, Sun 2:35 PM (1/1)

Theory and Real Life — Venster, Sun 3:06 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q18 — RGaetano, Sun 2:34 PM (1/1)

diverse registry vendors--yes!! — stuartw, Sun 6:38 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q12 — RGaetano, Sun 2:33 PM (2/2)

initial gTLDs — stuartw, Sun 6:35 PM (0/0)
registries — fnord, Sun 4:13 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q08 — RGaetano, Sun 2:32 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q07 — RGaetano, Sun 2:30 PM (1/1)

characteristics, continued — stuartw, Sun 6:28 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q05 — RGaetano, Sun 2:29 PM (1/1)

well, you could... — stuartw, Sun 7:06 PM (0/0)

New TLDs - Q04 — RGaetano, Sun 2:27 PM (0/0)

selection process should be clearly defined — dlee, Sun 1:59 PM (0/0)

DNS should die if business choose TLD's new assigment — davidaff, Sun 12:54 AM (2/2)

David - vive la France! — friedrich, Sun 3:20 PM (0/0)
Justice means governement means taxes — domainew, Sun 1:11 PM (0/0)

Hell is coming to domain world — domainew, Sun 12:47 AM (3/7)

I don't see the problem you see... — sybesma, Mon 10:17 AM (0/0)
Heaven and Hell! — friedrich, Sun 3:18 PM (0/0)
Um. . . er. . . WRONG. — WorldThoughts, Sun 1:01 PM (2/4)

Are you kidding? — layman, Sun 1:22 PM (1/2)

LOL — WorldThoughts, Sun 1:53 PM (1/1)

But — layman, Sun 5:13 PM (0/0)

I want to free you and, your Mother and mine. — domainew, Sun 1:18 PM (0/0)

Trademark, Charter issues — jamielove, Sun 12:42 AM (2/2)

ICANN has policies that undermine free speech, UDRP — Garry Anderson, Mon 9:58 AM (0/0)
yes but... — fnord, Sun 3:23 PM (0/0)

.museum - Further considerations — ckarp, Sun 11:09 AM (1/1)

Exactly right — fnord, Sun 2:40 PM (0/0)

MY RESPONSES TO YOUR POSTED QUESTIONS ON NEW gLTDs-My effortsof 2 days; 1 night & 1 "all-nighter"! — Nestor_DR, Sun 7:48 AM (2/9)

CONTEXT: RELEVANT CONGRESSIONAL DOCUMENTS -- U.S. CONGRESS -- HOUSE — Nestor DR, Mon 10:57 AM (0/0)
51 pages WOW! — Merlin, Sun 9:00 AM (1/7)

Come-on! — friedrich, Sun 3:06 PM (1/6)

FAIRLY AND SQUARELY — Nestor DR, Sun 6:50 PM (2/5)

A Monopolistic Viewpoint - Nestor — Garry Anderson, Mon 11:49 AM (1/1)

GARRY: PLEASE NOTE THE CONTENT--AND--CONTEXT, SO AS TO NOT HASTILY JUMP TO PRETEXTS OF *ILEGALITY* — Nestor DR, Mon 5:45 PM (0/0)

You are a strenuous person Nestor, but the .reg solution is imperative. — friedrich, Sun 10:39 PM (2/2)

IF THE POWERS-THAT-BE OFFICIALLY EXPAND THE ROLE OF ICANN RE TRADEMARKS YOU MIGHT BE ON TO SOMETHING — Nestor DR, Mon 11:56 PM (0/0)
PLEASE KINDLY SEE MY LATEST THREADS ABOVE: *CONGRESSIONAL CONTEXT* & *RESPONSE TO GERRY* — Nestor DR, Mon 9:06 PM (0/0)

To all those against new gTLD's — Merlin, Sun 6:40 AM (1/2)

SELF-INTEREST? — Sotiris, Sun 6:45 AM (1/1)

Now your obviously being — Merlin, Sun 6:51 AM (0/0)

New TLDs — NatVendExp, Sun 4:26 AM (2/15)

I have tears in my eyes ... — friedrich, Sun 2:03 PM (0/0)
I couldn't disagree more!! — Merlin, Sun 4:47 AM (3/13)

Response to Merlin — layman, Sun 1:05 PM (1/1)

are you cristobal colomb — jefsey, Sun 5:40 PM (0/0)

travel — fnord, Sun 6:07 AM (2/2)

No Ale! — domainew, Sun 1:05 PM (0/0)
Was not referring to you — Merlin, Sun 6:17 AM (0/0)

Consider this... — Sotiris, Sun 5:33 AM (1/7)

Global Facts call for more TLD's — Merlin, Sun 6:15 AM (2/6)

Country Specific? — ale, Sun 11:13 AM (0/0)
Bad analogy. — Sotiris, Sun 6:25 AM (2/4)

New gtlds won't hurt ... — friedrich, Sun 2:12 PM (0/0)
Quite Frankly — Merlin, Sun 6:32 AM (1/2)

Just one more point... — Sotiris, Sun 6:38 AM (1/1)

one more point — Merlin, Sun 6:41 AM (0/0)

Organizing the At Large Membership. — Sotiris, Sun 4:10 AM (1/1)

There is a site already set up for this purpose — jandl, Mon 5:47 AM (0/0)

Private Property Rights to TLDs - Be careful — jpalmeradns, Sun 3:24 AM (3/11)

I think you have a problem — jandl, Mon 5:50 AM (0/0)
Legal ownership of TLDs — jeffmarsh, Sun 3:46 AM (1/7)

Questions again — Merlin, Sun 3:51 AM (2/6)

Re: Questions again — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:00 AM (2/4)

Usage — Merlin, Sun 4:17 AM (1/1)

The courts will have to decide — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:38 AM (0/0)

Yes they can — jpalmeradns, Sun 4:06 AM (1/1)

Very interesting — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:11 AM (0/0)

How is it misused — jpalmeradns, Sun 3:54 AM (0/0)

Questions — Merlin, Sun 3:39 AM (1/1)

The others have no right to our property — jpalmeradns, Sun 3:43 AM (0/0)

TLD issues that should have been considered — adam, Sun 3:21 AM (0/0)

Question for IPLAWYER (and other lawyers): Trademarks and non-profit organizations — dotweb, Sun 2:48 AM (2/4)

Non-Profits and Trademarks — iplawyer, Mon 7:33 PM (0/0)
not a lawyer, but... — fnord, Sun 4:38 AM (1/2)

UDRP — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:54 AM (1/1)

UDRP — fnord, Sun 5:44 AM (0/0)

how is the ICANN going to prevent all of us to sue them all? — jefsey, Sun 1:14 AM (4/8)

it is time to enter the brave new internet world! — jefsey, Sun 3:38 PM (0/0)
Sorry, but this makes not much sense — friedrich, Sun 12:39 AM (0/0)
The Sky is falling....the Sky is falling.... — Gregory Krajewski, Sun 3:21 AM (0/0)
Your "scenario" is not logical — jeffmarsh, Sun 3:03 AM (2/4)

The Rush — jestiny, Sun 6:51 PM (0/0)
scripts — fnord, Sun 4:09 AM (1/2)

Yes, but... — jeffmarsh, Sun 4:30 AM (1/1)

however — fnord, Sun 4:56 AM (0/0)

The new TLD's and small companies — kingtodd, Sun 1:08 AM (1/4)

we the people — jefsey, Sun 1:58 AM (1/3)

I don't Agree — Merlin, Sun 2:57 AM (2/2)

.com versus .org versus .com versus .net versus .web versus .cc. . . . — WorldThoughts, Sun 12:47 AM (0/0)
100% agreed — friedrich, Sun 12:23 AM (0/0)

SYS gTLD proposition — jefsey, Sat 11:30 PM (3/9)

LOL - ROFL - TWADDLE — Garry Anderson, Sun 11:28 AM (0/0)
What if... — 410, Sun 12:25 AM (1/1)

I am afraid you actually fight your point — jefsey, Sun 1:26 AM (0/0)

Not — 410, Sun 12:05 AM (1/5)

I would certainly not tarr you !!! — jefsey, Sun 1:43 AM (1/4)

Thanks for the compliment, but here is where we differ. . . — 410, Sun 2:00 AM (1/3)

you are right but we have to go ahead in addition! — jefsey, Sun 2:22 AM (1/2)

Interesting — 410, Sun 2:30 AM (1/1)

there is far more room in sys that in com for serious project — jefsey, Sun 4:09 PM (0/0)

Has this just been an academic exercise? — fnord, Sat 10:41 PM (0/0)

WIPO Violation of ICANN TLD Rules - Open Letter to the Board of Directors — duffyking, Sat 9:58 PM (0/0)

Current TLD Dispute procedure must be sorted out first — duffyking, Sat 9:28 PM (6/18)

Agreed — friedrich, Sun 11:57 AM (1/1)

Again, Thanks — duffyking, Sun 12:08 AM (0/0)

To protect your domain name — Garry Anderson, Sun 10:46 AM (2/7)

Bad Idea — layman, Sun 12:40 AM (2/5)

Who is afraid of .reg? — friedrich, Sun 2:20 PM (1/3)

As I said — layman, Sun 5:30 PM (2/2)

dot REG is a certificate of authentication — Garry Anderson, Mon 9:47 AM (0/0)
Thanks for your (wrong) advices. — friedrich, Sun 10:45 PM (0/0)

You misunderstand - like most TM companies — Garry Anderson, Sun 1:56 PM (0/0)

Thanks but this won't work internationally — duffyking, Sun 11:48 AM (0/0)

I agree BUT — Merlin, Sun 6:49 AM (1/1)

If rules were laid down first this would work — duffyking, Sun 11:54 AM (0/0)

A GOOD PROPOSAL — Sotiris, Sun 5:42 AM (1/1)

ICANN set the rules so they should be involved — duffyking, Sun 11:40 AM (0/0)

Hear, hear! — Venster, Sat 10:41 PM (1/1)

Reverse Hijacking should be looked at first — duffyking, Sun 11:34 AM (0/0)

AGREED! — AboutMoney, Sat 9:37 PM (1/1)

Thanks — duffyking, Sat 10:02 PM (0/0)

New TLDs and Search Engines. — AboutMoney, Sat 9:21 PM (1/12)

Huh?! — WorldThoughts, Sat 9:36 PM (2/11)

"because he will get it first" ...do you realy think so ? — jefsey, Sun 12:03 AM (1/1)

Wrong - LOAN.COM — Garry Anderson, Sun 10:18 AM (0/0)

putobale — AboutMoney, Sat 9:40 PM (2/8)

Please read instead of repeating ... — friedrich, Sun 10:27 AM (0/0)
Answer — WorldThoughts, Sat 9:49 PM (1/6)

six is a registered trademark! — dotweb, Sat 11:59 PM (5/5)

SIX is trademarked!! — jestiny, Sun 5:05 PM (0/0)
SIX ... — friedrich, Sun 11:43 AM (0/0)
Should be unlawful to trademark GENERIC words — Garry Anderson, Sun 10:27 AM (0/0)
But it is trademarked for> — Merlin, Sun 8:20 AM (0/0)
If that is true.... — 410, Sun 12:09 AM (0/0)

What is the required structure of TLD's anyway? — chadlupkes, Sat 6:15 PM (1/1)

Maybe ... — friedrich, Sat 6:22 PM (0/0)

ICANN Should Not Accept a .union TLD — Dan Yager, Sat 4:59 PM (2/19)

Orthogonal gTLDs — jaylev, Mon 1:31 AM (0/0)
.union — fnord, Sat 9:38 PM (1/17)

What next: .church ? Who wants this ? — Venster, Sat 11:26 PM (1/16)

need for TLDs — fnord, Sun 12:41 AM (3/15)

Very true! — friedrich, Sun 10:04 AM (0/0)
Contradiction — 410, Sun 1:28 AM (1/2)

miscommunication — fnord, Sun 2:44 AM (1/1)

Where did we go wrong? <sob> — 410, Sun 2:52 AM (0/0)

TLD themes — 410, Sun 1:16 AM (2/10)

I think Gary wants to solve the trademark problem by introducing new open gtlds ... — friedrich, Sun 10:10 AM (1/4)

not exactly — fnord, Sun 2:09 PM (2/3)

Logical answer to all TM problems — Garry Anderson, Sun 2:39 PM (1/1)

fame — fnord, Sun 3:47 PM (0/0)

But ... — friedrich, Sun 2:24 PM (0/0)

differentiation — fnord, Sun 2:13 AM (1/4)

I am running out of titles for these posts. . . Heehee — 410, Sun 3:10 AM (1/3)

ditto :) — fnord, Sun 3:26 AM (1/2)

So three TLDs walk into a bar. And the bartenders says to the first one. . . — 410, Sun 3:49 AM (1/1)

...are you com, net, or org, you look so much alike — fnord, Sun 4:18 AM (0/0)

ICANN, WIPO, ARBITERS & INSANITY. — WorldThoughts, Sat 3:15 PM (3/4)

Worth Reading — Bond, Sun 5:02 AM (0/0)
Hear Hear!!! — LoonLady, Sat 7:12 PM (1/1)

No. — WorldThoughts, Sat 8:22 PM (0/0)

Can ICANN, etc. Be Sued? — Voice Of Reason, Sat 5:56 PM (0/0)

General proposel for new gtlds - please comment on it! — friedrich, Sat 9:57 AM (1/3)

Reasoned Response. — Garry Anderson, Sat 12:58 AM (1/2)

As short as possible — friedrich, Sat 4:16 PM (1/1)

Your Good Intentions — Garry Anderson, Sat 6:01 PM (0/0)

LIFE IS THE RISK TO DIE! ... AND .WEB? — friedrich, Sat 9:14 AM (0/0)

New TLD system...just a thought — vraj, Sat 3:46 AM (0/0)

.XXX - Let's Get Control of Pornography — pride5356, Sat 2:25 AM (1/12)

Just some thoughts. . . — 410, Sat 11:09 AM (2/11)

What is needed — GregInHouston, Sat 2:46 PM (3/7)

Giving them a place to go — chadlupkes, Sat 5:45 PM (0/0)
.SEX vs. .COM — friedrich, Sat 4:39 PM (1/3)

Frightening. — WorldThoughts, Sat 5:22 PM (1/2)

Hmmm ... — friedrich, Sat 6:01 PM (1/1)

.adult and .kids — fnord, Sat 8:55 PM (0/0)

Hmmm. . . — WorldThoughts, Sat 3:35 PM (1/1)

re: Hmmm. . . — greginhouston, Sun 6:58 PM (0/0)

Agree with 410 — Garry Anderson, Sat 12:08 AM (1/2)

Not quite what I was saying, though. — 410, Sat 12:43 AM (1/1)

Misunderstanding — Garry Anderson, Sat 1:18 PM (0/0)

Responses to Questions - Addendum — iplawyer, Fri 10:33 PM (0/0)

Comments on new TLDs from a museum perspective — ckarp, Fri 8:50 PM (0/0)

Responses to Questions — iplawyer, Fri 8:33 PM (6/7)

Disagree — JY, Sun 2:09 AM (1/1)

Sweep the database of .web AND .tv?? — friedrich, Sun 9:56 AM (0/0)

99% agree — moulden, Sat 9:30 PM (0/0)
Interesting — friedrich, Sat 9:42 AM (0/0)
Good Points — enforcer, Sat 12:53 AM (0/0)
You forgot to mention - from previous post — Garry Anderson, Sat 12:35 AM (0/0)
agree with IPLawyer — stuartw, Fri 11:34 PM (0/0)

Comments on introduction of new TLD — Collignon, Fri 4:14 PM (0/0)

Abolish TLDs instead! — GALund, Fri 11:50 AM (2/2)

True - TLD's are not being used for good anyway — scottt, Sat 4:18 PM (0/0)
Impossible — Venster, Fri 2:17 PM (0/0)

My viewpoint only — bigtymer, Fri 7:47 AM (4/13)

I wrote IANA for information concerning .web — Gregory Krajewski, Fri 11:25 PM (2/2)

Constituencies — fnord, Sat 7:37 PM (0/0)
Just something to think about... — freedom2001, Sat 12:19 AM (0/0)

My experience — bmitchell, Fri 12:51 AM (2/5)

My experience — 410, Fri 5:56 PM (2/3)

LIFE IS THE RISK TO DIE! — friedrich, Sat 9:13 AM (0/0)
yes... — freedom2001, Fri 8:06 PM (1/1)

And. . . — 410, Fri 9:06 PM (0/0)

i'll admit — freedom2001, Fri 4:43 PM (0/0)

Researches, analysis, discussions AND decisions are needed! Are you afraid? — friedrich, Fri 10:25 AM (0/0)
It is ONLY your viewpoint! — Garry Anderson, Fri 10:23 AM (1/2)

viewpoints — freedom2001, Fri 5:00 PM (1/1)

You Are Wrong — Garry Anderson, Fri 7:35 PM (0/0)

I am a member of the internet community.....I would like this addressed at YOKOHAMA!! Thanks! — Gregory Krajewski, Fri 1:06 AM (1/5)

I think ICANN means something else.... — Venster, Fri 2:14 PM (2/4)

. . . because. . . — 410, Sat 10:44 AM (0/0)
Long names — friedrich, Fri 5:38 PM (1/2)

IPs ? — Venster, Sat 1:55 AM (1/1)

Using numbers — friedrich, Sat 9:03 AM (0/0)

Domains and Trademarks, cont. — hmg, Thu 7:32 PM (1/1)

Told you so — Garry Anderson, Thu 11:17 PM (0/0)

another comment system — wessorh, Thu 6:17 PM (0/0)

EU domain? — Venster, Thu 3:50 PM (2/8)

Tld .eu — hias, Fri 10:25 AM (0/0)
Approval of .EU would be a slap in the face — cambler, Thu 4:45 PM (1/6)

It is a money making excercise — Garry Anderson, Thu 7:14 PM (2/5)

It's about something much different — Tadu, Sat 8:58 PM (1/1)

Still does not answer the question — Garry Anderson, Sun 8:58 AM (0/0)

Thank you, but aren't other new TLDs as well? — Venster, Thu 8:23 PM (2/2)

Yes - which is what I have said about .REG — Garry Anderson, Thu 10:42 PM (0/0)
Yes, the are — cambler, Thu 10:08 PM (0/0)

Realease a comprehensive list of TLDs aimed at niche markets. — bendudex, Thu 11:34 AM (2/3)

Flooding the market with TLD's — jestiny, Thu 3:15 PM (0/0)
New gtlds + new search engine needed: Search "name" + "trademark" + "international" or "country"! — friedrich, Thu 2:37 PM (1/1)

.REG — jestiny, Fri 9:36 AM (0/0)

PROPOSED 15 POINTS MOTION FOR YOKOHAMA -- CALL FOR INPUT — Nestor_DR, Thu 3:45 AM (0/0)

My Final Comments to ICANN......web/iod/icann/opinions/the future — Gregory Krajewski, Thu 1:58 AM (1/1)

Response. — 410, Thu 4:28 PM (0/0)

Heed this warning! — Merlin, Wed 11:55 PM (1/4)

Heed this warning! — enforcer, Thu 12:32 AM (1/3)

One of the threats — jestiny, Thu 9:07 AM (1/2)

Sharp analysis! — Venster, Thu 4:02 PM (1/1)

What ".net" is an abbreviation for. — 410, Thu 4:20 PM (0/0)

Whose Internet is it anyway? — Merlin, Wed 10:36 PM (0/0)

Let's ALL meditate on Jonathan Postel's picture... — Rebeka, Wed 6:49 PM (2/7)

Let's meditate on JON POSTEL'S words... — Sotiris, Thu 6:01 AM (0/0)
Good idea, as Bible texts are wiped off the 'net anyway — Venster, Thu 12:26 AM (1/5)

MY PERSONAL OPINION. — Sotiris, Thu 5:28 AM (2/4)

Corinthians.com — friedrich, Thu 2:19 PM (1/2)

Insane Arbiters at WIPO — WorldThoughts, Fri 9:36 PM (1/1)

TELL ME ABOUT IT — Garry Anderson, Sat 12:47 AM (0/0)

You should have corinthians.NET — Venster, Thu 5:42 AM (0/0)

ICANN is still viewed as a US company by many European registrars, — Rebeka, Wed 6:19 PM (0/0)

Who owns the root Servers? DO we need ICANN for new u-TLD's? — Rebeka, Wed 5:53 PM (2/5)

Or we can "all" join to - The Open Root Server Confederation — Rebeka, Wed 6:14 PM (0/0)
Uuups, i just found this! The SuperRoot Consortium — Rebeka, Wed 6:00 PM (1/3)

variations — fnord, Wed 6:32 PM (1/2)

I'll ask here.. — Mr.C, Wed 7:38 PM (1/1)

ICANN-US — fnord, Wed 10:02 PM (0/0)

Diamonds forever ... by auctioning gtlds — friedrich, Wed 4:18 PM (0/0)

ICANN..The Naming — Voice Of Reason, Wed 4:07 PM (0/0)

ICANN - we need a clear statement + immediate 1st-step-action and afterwards new discussions! — friedrich, Wed 3:36 PM (2/2)

URGENCY IS THE OPERATIVE WORD — Nestor_DR, Wed 7:16 PM (0/0)
ICANN — Voice Of Reason, Wed 3:52 PM (0/0)

In-Depth Analysis--ICANN & Forum Participants.. — Voice Of Reason, July 5 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)

Famous Marks Protection during Start-Up of aTLD — Dennis, July 4 @ 9:30 PM (1/1)

DNSO did not listen to Working Group C -- IN my opinion — Gregory Krajewski, July 5 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)

Question 46:�� Should there be Famous Marks protection? — Dennis, July 4 @ 7:42 PM (0/0)

Questions 41-42:� More IP Protection Needed? — Dennis, July 4 @ 7:01 PM (1/1)

correct — friedrich, July 4 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)

Questions 25-28: Welfare Program for the IP Industry — Dennis, July 4 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)

ICANN SHOULD MANAGE TLDs ONE STEP FURTHER — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 6:01 PM (5/14)

why not 256+ long domain names — jefsey, Sat 11:49 PM (0/0)
Why just .web?� What about .ftp and .gopher? — _Jeff, July 5 @ 12:48 AM (1/1)

SUSTAINABILITY AND RELEVANCE ARE THE STRATEGIC KEYS — Nestor DR, July 5 @ 8:19 AM (0/0)

And where does the money go? Charity? And what about the trademark solutions? Remain unchanged? — friedrich, July 4 @ 9:19 PM (1/5)

MONEY WOULD GO TO ICANN TO GIVE ACCESS TO THE MASSES — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 10:06 PM (2/4)

Well stated. — Sotiris, July 5 @ 3:51 AM (1/2)

Trademark cops — fnord, July 5 @ 4:50 AM (1/1)

Correct — friedrich, Wed 3:42 PM (0/0)

ABOUT .REG -- I THINK IT HAS TREMENDOUS MERIT — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 10:34 PM (0/0)

Stop and think — Naked Ape, July 4 @ 7:18 PM (1/2)

A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS WILL SHOW A POSITIVE NET VALUE — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 8:09 PM (1/1)

Further — Sotiris, July 4 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)

Change of direction... — Sotiris, July 4 @ 7:07 PM (1/1)

VERY INTERESTING :-) — Nestor DR, July 4 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)

Questions 17-18:� To Promote Competition in Registration? — Dennis, July 4 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)

It is easy! — Naked Ape, July 4 @ 4:45 PM (1/1)

Maybe you will not need a book — Venster, July 5 @ 2:55 AM (0/0)

Auctioning domain names under the new gTLDs — Georg Panzer, July 4 @ 2:52 PM (2/13)

ICANN auction only way to avoid stampede on day one — interpres, July 5 @ 7:09 AM (1/8)

That was a hoot! — WorldThoughts, Wed 12:49 AM (2/7)

So your idea of equality obliges ICANN to sell diamonds and worthless beads at the same price? — interpres, Wed 10:39 PM (1/5)

TWADDLE - ICANN is NON-PROFIT MAKING Organization — Garry Anderson, Wed 11:41 PM (1/4)

Did you know... A non-profit is not prohibited from making money. — interpres, Thu 2:26 AM (1/3)

You may as well throw the money away — Garry Anderson, Thu 10:46 AM (1/2)

That's wrong with first come, first served! — Georg Panzer, Thu 1:34 PM (1/1)

My question is not answered — Garry Anderson, Thu 10:27 PM (0/0)

Trademark law,� again ... — friedrich, Wed 4:04 PM (0/0)

TWADDLE — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 3:43 PM (1/3)

Equal — Georg Panzer, Wed 10:41 AM (2/2)

animal.farm — fnord, Wed 4:39 PM (0/0)
Equality for all — Garry Anderson, Wed 1:19 PM (0/0)

Trademarks and Domains — hmg, July 4 @ 2:28 PM (1/4)

It is even worse with the ICANN UDRP — Venster, Thu 12:18 AM (1/3)

Nothing is safe — Garry Anderson, Thu 12:50 AM (1/2)

A Boycott? — Venster, Thu 1:08 AM (1/1)

Simple Answer — Garry Anderson, Thu 1:32 AM (0/0)

ICAAN Should Stay Out of the Trademark Business — bigjohn, July 4 @ 1:44 PM (2/2)

Agreed — hmg, July 4 @ 2:27 PM (0/0)
ICANN--Read bigjohn & this Please — Voice Of Reason, July 4 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)

ICANN - a majority of Internet users want some new u-TLD's! — Rebeka, July 4 @ 12:03 AM (1/4)

Substantiation? — Sotiris, July 4 @ 5:42 PM (1/3)

Most users will *hate* new gTLDs — Venster, July 5 @ 2:42 AM (1/2)

Will new TLDs cause confusion? — WorldThoughts, July 5 @ 3:38 AM (1/1)

P.S. — WorldThoughts, July 5 @ 3:54 AM (0/0)

Why no communication with the ICANN Directors here? — Rebeka, July 4 @ 11:54 AM (2/7)

We all understand your frustration — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 12:47 AM (1/3)

Reply — 410, July 4 @ 1:36 PM (1/2)

ICANN - Public Relations Exercise. — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 2:49 PM (1/1)

Some thoughts. — 410, July 4 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)

Rebeka. . . — 410, July 4 @ 12:31 AM (1/2)

Dear 410 — Rebeka, July 4 @ 4:07 PM (1/1)

Thank you. — 410, July 4 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)

Misusing trademarks for anti-competitive purposes — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)

IPC (Intellectual Property Constituency) and trademark infringement — friedrich, July 4 @ 10:13 AM (1/1)

AGREED!!!!! — Voice Of Reason, July 4 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)

Signs or Symbols? — Sotiris, July 4 @ 5:30 AM (0/0)

We must first clarify our objective — Galomb, July 4 @ 4:55 AM (4/4)

Hmmm...I like the idea...yet I disagree in principle — Gregory Krajewski, July 5 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)
Well Said — Layman, July 4 @ 1:58 PM (0/0)
A fairer representation. — WorldThoughts, July 4 @ 11:19 AM (0/0)
I question this statement>> — Merlin, July 4 @ 5:33 AM (0/0)

Trademark Scenario? — Merlin, July 4 @ 3:42 AM (2/4)

They know the Answer — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 3:13 PM (1/2)

Let me throw this in. . . — 410, July 4 @ 3:39 PM (1/1)

Very Important - Back to you — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)

But Some Love Problems — Layman, July 4 @ 1:42 PM (0/0)

My Question to ICANN. — Sotiris, July 4 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)

My comments (pleas read) to IPC's response.... — Greg Krajewski, July 3 @ 9:53 PM (1/1)

Takes time (quite a lot of it, seemingly) another kick at the I.P. Cat — dank, July 3 @ 11:56 PM (0/0)

Purposed domains: ftp, gopher, https — _Jeff, July 3 @ 9:19 PM (0/0)

What will IOD do now? — Rebeka, July 3 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)

There will be NO new uTLD's in the next future!!! — Rebeka, July 3 @ 8:33 PM (0/0)

IPC Responses to Questions on Introduction of New TLDs — IPC (Intellectual Property Constituency), July 3 @ 7:51 PM (3/4)

Critique of Response of the Intellectual Property Constituency — fnord, July 4 @ 11:13 AM (1/1)

Gary, I share your opinion. — friedrich, July 4 @ 12:52 AM (0/0)

Problems With Your Bowel Movements This Morning? — 410, July 4 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)
We know who you work for! — Merlin, July 4 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)

Internet God's - do they hear us? Esther Dyson are you here? — Rebeka, July 3 @ 7:19 PM (1/3)

Tsk Tsk — fnord, July 3 @ 7:34 PM (1/2)

Good question despite AUP — Venster, July 3 @ 7:51 PM (1/1)

Answer — 410, July 4 @ 3:31 AM (0/0)

"Registration" — Merlin, July 3 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)

Question 49 - 74 Comments Friedrich Kisters — friedrich, July 3 @ 5:28 PM (1/1)

Q68 — R�diger, Wed 9:01 PM (0/0)

Question 25 - 48 Comments Friedrich Kisters — friedrich, July 3 @ 5:25 PM (0/0)

Question 1 - 24 Comments Friedrich Kisters — friedrich, July 3 @ 5:22 PM (0/0)

Wiping the database clean — mediaevum, July 3 @ 3:34 PM (2/6)

You too can write a script! — Naked Ape, July 4 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)
Disagree — Crash999, July 4 @ 3:04 AM (3/4)

Disagreement — MEDIAEVUM, July 4 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)
Vested Interests, and Libel — WorldThoughts, July 4 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)
Fair and Equal — Merlin, July 4 @ 4:13 AM (1/1)

Crashing and burning logic — WorldThoughts, July 4 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

New gtlds AND NO trademark problems. — friedrich, July 3 @ 12:54 AM (1/5)

Too complicated — Venster, July 3 @ 4:53 PM (1/4)

Thanks for supporting my solution. — friedrich, July 3 @ 5:24 PM (1/3)

Are you a politician? — Venster, July 3 @ 7:41 PM (1/2)

Did you get the point? Well, well, ... — friedrich, July 3 @ 8:09 PM (1/1)

In whose interests are they working? — Garry Anderson, July 4 @ 11:37 AM (0/0)

rosenthal, ulterior motives???? — Merlin, July 3 @ 6:01 AM (2/2)

who really is rosenthal — enforcer, July 3 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
Please stop personal attacks altogether. Thanks! — friedrich, July 3 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)

Opinions are only good if they are backed up! — Gregory Krajewski, July 3 @ 5:18 AM (2/2)

Pr