ICANN Public Comments Forum | Forum on New TLD Applications

This Comment Forum is now closed.

ICANN Public Comment Forum

Forum on New TLD Applications

This Public Comment Forum is dedicated to discussion of New TLD Applications that have been submitted to ICANN. Please note that it is organized by top-level threads. Right below you will find a listing of specific threads, one for each application. If you have a comment about a particular TLD application, please comment in the thread for that application. To make a general comment, use the "General Comments" thread at the bottom of this forum page. You can go directly to the "General Comments" thread by clicking here.

Forum Closed Sunday, 5 November 2000.

.ads, etc. Application by Name.Space, Incorporated — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:39 PM (65/177)

Support for Name.Space and IOD — S. Hudgens, 11:44 PM (0/0)
Final Word To ICANN: Name-Space & IOD — Eliahu, 8:19 PM (1/1)

I support this comment — friedrich, 10:40 PM (0/0)

Say YES! to IOD and Name Space — first1, 3:43 PM (0/0)
I support .SHOP for Name.Space — netizen1, 5:41 AM (0/0)
I PROTEST AGAINST THAT FORUM SYSTEM — jefsey, 4:01 AM (1/1)

Each reload means reloading approx. 1 MB! — friedrich, 10:45 PM (0/0)

ICANN Bribery? — jtrade, 3:55 AM (0/0)
Domains already "registered" at Name.Space — zgyeo, 2:47 AM (2/4)

Name-Space has rights — Merlin, 2:56 AM (1/2)

CAS-COM = Commercial Connect, Inc — zgyeo, 3:08 AM (1/1)

Who are you? — Merlin, 3:23 AM (0/0)

And the people shouting for Name.Space must have registered great domains with Name.Space! — zgyeo, 2:54 AM (0/0)

"Dirt in The Domain Name Game" — jtrade, Sun 12:11 AM (0/0)
They are great — prissyfit, Sat 1:32 PM (0/0)
Name Space Inc. Application — The Walt Disney Company, Fri 11:29 PM (2/7)

Stability of the Internet? — S. Hudgens, Sat 3:48 AM (1/4)

Bumping Trademark Infringement — PHXbird, Sat 5:31 PM (2/3)

This is what the law says ... — friedrich, Sun 12:40 AM (1/1)

Registration-YES; lawsuits-NO — PHXbird, 9:45 PM (0/0)

TMs — World Thoughts, Sat 6:01 PM (0/0)

I Support Name-Space For .Shop TLD — shawn, Sat 1:25 AM (1/1)

Support .SHOP for NAME-SPACE. — choice, Sun 12:24 AM (0/0)

Top Level Domains — seanjason, Fri 8:53 PM (0/0)
Support for Name.Space and .shop — S. Hudgens, Fri 4:33 PM (0/0)
Support Name Space — daimonic, Fri 8:03 AM (0/0)
Do you know why NAME-SPACE'S .SHOP is best? — webcafe, Fri 1:47 AM (0/0)
Support for Name.Space application — URLMerchant, Fri 1:47 AM (1/1)

I support for Name-space application too!! — grimnaru, Fri 2:10 AM (0/0)

Let's hope the ICANN doesn't approve too many of these! — ipguy, Fri 12:38 AM (0/0)
.games tld — mevans, Thu 8:19 PM (0/0)
I DO NOT AGREE NAME.SPACE IS NOT BEST FOR .SHOP — Talmage, Thu 3:18 PM (0/0)
I support Name-Space — jtrade, Wed 10:02 PM (2/3)

Support .shop by name-spce! — webcafe, Fri 1:22 AM (0/0)
I support name-space's .shop too! — pasteltone, Thu 1:28 AM (1/1)

Also support .SHOP for Name.Space — netizen1, Thu 10:33 PM (0/0)

Unexplored, Inc. Urges Acceptance of .Shop Registrations by Name-Space — Unexplored, Wed 9:43 PM (0/0)
NAME-SPACE'S .SHOP IS NOT THE BEST .SHOP — Talmage, Wed 2:24 PM (1/1)

Name Space Has Only One Business Interest And Specialty — aaaswt, Thu 2:34 PM (0/0)

Yes to .SHOP by NAME-SPACE ! — arts Lee, Wed 6:58 AM (0/0)
VOTE to .SHOP by NAME-SPACE — net, Wed 6:45 AM (0/0)
New Tld's and ICANN Conflict of Interest? — jtrade, Wed 2:20 AM (0/0)
Yes to .ART by NameSpace — cello, Mon 6:45 AM (0/0)
Yes to Name Space: common sense, democracy, free market — Ivo, Mon 1:52 AM (0/0)
Preregistrations allowed with NSI!!!! — C.Bell, Mon 1:46 AM (0/0)
Hurray for Name Space — pdr, October 29 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)
ICANN say yes to Namespace — noisefactor, October 29 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
yes to Name.Space — fly, October 29 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)
I support name.space — patty, October 28 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
NEED FOT MORE AND MORE TLD'S — ajay, October 28 @ 8:49 AM (0/0)
"Beware the ICANN Board Squatters" — jtrade, October 27 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)
Beware of capitalist-speak — Melvin Q. Watchpocket, October 27 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)
fails completely — squish, October 26 @ 1:30 PM (2/6)

Name-Space isn't the "New Kid On The Block" — aaaswt, October 27 @ 2:03 PM (0/0)
ya, its not perfect... — xaero, October 26 @ 2:30 PM (1/4)

Right But Wrong — ChrisT, October 26 @ 6:21 PM (1/3)

Not many but a few — xaero, October 26 @ 10:09 PM (1/2)

Why Biased? — ChrisT, Mon 3:57 PM (1/1)

The usual.. — xaero, Wed 4:58 PM (0/0)

TO ICANN board members, staff, and applicants (including NAMESPACE)......WHERE ARE YOU???? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 4:22 AM (1/2)

Please... — DotIT, October 26 @ 7:01 AM (1/1)

Who are you... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 11:47 PM (0/0)

give pioneers a chance - vote for namespace and IOD - Interview about ICANN - president Ether Dyser — ted, October 25 @ 11:21 PM (1/3)

Generally, but Name space in particular — cojock, October 27 @ 10:57 PM (1/2)

Dot Travel — cojock, October 27 @ 11:23 PM (1/1)

.travel — herricktravel, Fri 2:07 PM (0/0)

NameSpace — peniel, October 25 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)
Can I register .web now — Anili, October 25 @ 2:15 PM (1/1)

Yes, but you must hope that IOD's application is accepted (as it would be fair) — fabrcop, October 25 @ 3:29 PM (0/0)

: ( — World Thoughts, October 25 @ 8:26 AM (0/0)
MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:49 AM (2/4)

msnbc-meeks-icann — webster, October 26 @ 5:45 PM (2/2)

PR flacks really need to restrain themselves :-) — pvos, October 27 @ 5:22 PM (0/0)
Right... — cambler, October 26 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)

NeuStar Bribing/Threatening ICANN? — pvos, October 25 @ 6:06 PM (0/0)

Comments Perios Must be Extended Even Longer! — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:29 AM (0/0)
YES to .magic by Name.Space — Igor, October 25 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)
More Than One — ChrisT, October 24 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)
Vote Yes to Name.Space — Joe Trip, October 24 @ 1:29 PM (0/0)
Where's the Competition? — jtrade, October 24 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)
YES to .lab — labdir, October 23 @ 2:38 PM (0/0)
What needs our future internet - pioneers like namespace or IOD - or monopolies ? whats your mind ? — ted, October 23 @ 6:39 AM (0/0)
Name-space Application for dot shop !! — grimnaru, October 23 @ 2:16 AM (4/17)

Why Name Space? — mgcarter, Fri 9:38 PM (0/0)
Vote to Name Space's dot shop: common sense! — sexy, Tue 6:41 AM (3/3)

Yes to name-space DOT SHOP!!!! — emails, Wed 6:03 AM (0/0)
I agree that Name.space's .shop is a good for a new gTLD. — asia, Wed 5:13 AM (0/0)
I vote to Name-space's .shop now! — dream, Tue 11:27 PM (0/0)

New gTLD - name-space's .shop domain are the peoples choice!! — bluecdm, October 23 @ 8:23 PM (6/6)

We likes name-space's .shop domain! — viohouse, Tue 3:48 AM (0/0)
ICANN say yes to name space's .shop domain too!! — homeshopping, Tue 3:32 AM (0/0)
I cann say "yes to namespace's dot shop" domain name! — ekorea, Mon 8:01 AM (0/0)
Can I register .shop domain name? — korea.shop, October 28 @ 5:37 PM (0/0)
Can I register .shop domain name? — shoppe, October 28 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
Name-Space survey of the internet community-Give them .shop. — aaaswt, October 24 @ 1:14 PM (0/0)

I like name-spce .shop domain name! — eeuni, October 23 @ 8:02 PM (4/4)

I suport name-space's .shop too! — stockexchange, Tue 5:13 AM (0/0)
I suport name-space's .shop — dot shop, Mon 7:19 AM (0/0)
Yes to .shop by name-space !! — shops, Mon 7:10 AM (0/0)
I'd like register name-space .shop domain name too! — art korea, October 29 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)

Comments about ICANN New TLD process - Is anything being done about it? — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)
Pioneer Preference — cambler, October 22 @ 8:04 PM (4/22)

Mr Ambler, please can you answer my questions — wiredz, October 25 @ 1:03 PM (5/9)

WiredZ...why didn't you say you were from openSRS.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 3:54 AM (0/0)
Response — cambler, October 25 @ 7:40 PM (0/0)
wiredz misunderstands or misrepresents the ruling's significance — pvos, October 25 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)
This shows that IOD can't use .web as a trademark but does not deny IOD's rights on .web — fabrcop, October 25 @ 3:39 PM (2/4)

Image Online Design is the only proven regsitry for .web — johnnie, Fri 6:52 AM (0/0)
Let us first discuss what is the meaning of Rights & Trademarks — wiredz, October 27 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)

Wiredz reported ridicolously *wrong* facts and lost his credibility!!! — fabrcop, Sat 1:43 PM (0/0)
Response — cambler, October 27 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)

It's Hard To Take "WIREDZ" Seriously... — pilot2, October 25 @ 1:37 PM (0/0)

ICANN, PLEASE READ -- "The .Web Internet Domain Registry" - NOT !! — kcrash, October 25 @ 9:20 AM (1/1)

You might be right... — fagzal, Sun 12:16 AM (0/0)

FCC should have legal jurisdiction over the ICANN process — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 9:00 PM (2/8)

FCC should have legal jurisdiction over the ICANN process — kcrash, October 23 @ 8:04 AM (1/2)

You give readers a comical break — ALLDNS, October 23 @ 9:44 AM (1/1)

Who knows? — kcrash, October 25 @ 9:01 AM (0/0)

Can the political jokes — jmgraham, October 22 @ 10:02 PM (2/4)

Sir. . . — World Thoughts, October 23 @ 2:49 AM (0/0)
This is certainly no Joke! — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)

Think Again: Do You Really Want The FCC To Control ICANN? — pilot2, October 25 @ 4:18 PM (1/1)

ICANN is not a Government entity — ALLDNS, October 26 @ 8:15 AM (0/0)

hear hear! — anthony, October 22 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)

newbie: Please help - domain chanceled — Guaranie, October 22 @ 9:58 AM (0/0)
Moderator - Consider placing General Comments at top of Forum — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 3:22 AM (1/2)

YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT SIR. THAT'S WHY I POST A SIMILAR MESSASGE BELOW. MODERATOR-PLEASE NOTE! — Facilitator, October 22 @ 6:46 PM (1/1)

I agree — anthony, October 25 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)

Where is due process and the standards in all of this? — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 3:06 AM (1/1)

See below response — Hudgens, October 22 @ 5:11 PM (0/0)

Where are the rules? — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
***GENERAL COMMENTS AT BOTTOM OF FORUM***GENERAL COMMENTS AT BOTTOM OF FORUM*** — Facilitator, October 22 @ 1:47 AM (1/1)

With all due respect sir.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 1:40 PM (0/0)

.ads domains — kh, October 21 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
Namespace Application — sjk, October 19 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:40 PM (1/1)

I want to add my support to extend this forum — emc2, October 18 @ 6:24 PM (0/0)

Reservations about Name.Space — Korskarn, October 15 @ 1:39 PM (1/1)

Name space — Ange, October 17 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)

Greed by Name.Space — hoffy, October 14 @ 11:34 PM (3/6)

Greed, or Saints? — kcrash, October 23 @ 8:13 AM (0/0)
Name.Space is simply trying to help make the Internet what it should be. — Hudgens, October 22 @ 1:16 AM (1/2)

Who says Namespace will not get New TLDs? — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 2:28 AM (1/1)

ICANN rules regarding new TLD's — Hudgens, October 22 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)

You missed the mark. — cello, October 15 @ 2:16 AM (1/1)

I missed the mark? — hoffy, October 15 @ 5:30 AM (0/0)

TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot/IOD Supporters are getting organized...We are building a website!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)
What is the Name.Space intent? — marshm, October 14 @ 3:06 AM (1/1)

LAND GRAB? — kcrash, October 23 @ 7:39 AM (0/0)

Name-Space Application for .Shop and IODesign Application for .Web — Attorney, October 14 @ 1:43 AM (5/12)

IOD and Namespace may be granted .Shop — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 2:41 AM (2/4)

Who is to say. . . — For The People, October 22 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
Before you risk making a fool of yourself you should read the applications. — anthony, October 22 @ 8:18 PM (2/2)

ALLDNS Will NEVER Get The Point! — Sarah, October 23 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
The point of my comment — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 9:47 PM (0/0)

IOD should run .web & Name.Space should get .shop — Hudgens, October 22 @ 1:07 AM (2/2)

Image Online Design is the best registry for .web — Johnnie, October 29 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)
IOD should run .web — johnnyshin, October 26 @ 2:21 PM (0/0)

IODesign and Name-Space new gtlds... — Tomkins.J, October 14 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
a couple of greatest pioneers — cello, October 14 @ 6:07 AM (1/1)

Concrete Name is more good for ASIA and Africa, East Europe, Latin America people. — JP Kim, October 18 @ 8:58 AM (0/0)

Namespace and Image Online Design — first1, October 14 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)

Moderator: Please correct error in TLD description. — Name.Space, October 14 @ 12:38 AM (2/14)

INFINITE/UNIVERSAL TLDs: Something to think about... uTLDs !!! — kcrash, October 23 @ 7:08 AM (1/2)

Agreed! - eTLD (extended Top Level Domains) — boris7, October 26 @ 10:44 AM (1/1)

Agreed! - eTLD (extended Top Level Domains) — kcrash, October 29 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)

Mr. Moderator clearly has .web on his / her mind! — anthony, October 14 @ 4:42 PM (1/10)

Name.Space knows who should get .web — Hudgens, October 22 @ 1:11 AM (2/9)

Important! Name Space did not have a .web registry just because... — fabrcop, October 23 @ 9:45 AM (0/0)
Let a hundred thousand flowers (NAMES!) bloom — Melvin Q. Watchpocket, October 22 @ 10:21 PM (2/7)

open up the space with name-space...-miba — miba, October 23 @ 10:21 PM (0/0)
Hmmm. . . some interesting notions you have there. . . — World Thoughts, October 23 @ 3:19 AM (1/5)

We should all have the right... — kcrash, October 23 @ 5:08 AM (1/4)

Clearly — For The People, October 23 @ 2:41 PM (1/3)

uTLD, uSRS, uDNS — kcrash, October 25 @ 8:35 AM (1/2)

Let's get back to praising name-space and iodesign... — Miba, October 25 @ 11:34 PM (1/1)

Name-Space and IOD Deserve More Than Our Praise — aaaswt, October 28 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)

.africa, etc. Application by Rathbawn Computers Limited — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:38 PM (5/8)

whats about .europe or .eu domain??? — reklov, 7:03 PM (1/1)

.eu & .eu.com — PHXbird, 9:53 PM (0/0)

What does Sansansan mean? — YankeeFan, Fri 3:32 AM (0/0)
AFRICA for AFRICANS — MikeX, Mon 3:38 PM (1/2)

I absolutely agree! — rolandg, Thu 8:20 AM (1/1)

Thoughts — For The People, Thu 10:03 AM (0/0)

Rathbawn's app — peniel, October 25 @ 10:52 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)

.air, etc. Application by Société Internationale de Télécommunications Aéronautiques — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:38 PM (45/49)

support for .air — Mansour DIOP, Fri 8:15 PM (0/0)
Support.air — ScottGR, Fri 8:11 PM (0/0)
33 African Airlines Support ".air" — RDelgado, Fri 3:20 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — James Munene, Fri 2:46 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — GN, Fri 2:46 PM (0/0)
support of .air creation — airburundi, Fri 2:13 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — Air Mauritius DIRIT, Fri 2:09 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — Air Namibia (Pty) Ltd, Fri 1:45 PM (0/0)
ICANN - Flughafen Frankfurt Main AG (Airport) — RDelgado, Fri 12:09 AM (0/0)
support for SITA ".air" initiative — air france, Fri 12:06 AM (0/0)
Support for .air - Ethiopian Airlines — RDelgado, Fri 11:39 AM (0/0)
Support for .air — AIR FRANCE DGIT, Fri 9:58 AM (0/0)
Support for .air — AmadeusDP, Thu 1:17 PM (0/0)
support for .air — jrahib, Thu 11:29 AM (0/0)
Support for SITA .air TLD Proposal — dcaseychelles, Thu 10:46 AM (0/0)
28 Middle East and North African airlines support dot-air — egyptair, Wed 12:30 AM (0/0)
Support for SITA .AIR proposal — qantas, October 29 @ 5:45 AM (0/0)
Support SITA for ".air" TLD Application — asasvithq, October 28 @ 6:09 AM (0/0)
Support of ".air" — Ecabezas, October 27 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
Support ".air" — Ecabezas, October 27 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)
support for .air — mirekb, October 27 @ 7:48 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — alitalia, October 27 @ 12:58 AM (0/0)
Support for .air — China Airlines, October 27 @ 6:15 AM (0/0)
too narrow — pedro, October 27 @ 5:37 AM (0/0)
Support of ".air" — GOAAIT, October 26 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — aa, October 26 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)
Support — NForgeard, October 26 @ 10:16 AM (0/0)
Support — BobDFW, October 25 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)
Airport Support for the ".air" Proposal — sami, October 25 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
support for air applications — FdeCock, October 25 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
Support to SITA — aaco, October 25 @ 8:28 AM (0/0)
Support for Air — KK, October 24 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)
Supporting SITA's .air TLD application — polyair, October 24 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
Yes for .air Application by SITA — lamyt, October 23 @ 3:29 PM (0/0)
Support for SITA's application for .air — jmornement, October 23 @ 7:16 AM (0/0)
Strong Support for the .air Application by SITA — salaskar, October 21 @ 4:12 PM (0/0)
Support fot ".air" Application by SITA — Evergreen, October 21 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
Support for .air Application by SITA — lhanlock, October 20 @ 11:47 PM (0/0)
Support for ".air" — NWA, October 20 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
A very sound proposal — global view, October 19 @ 7:08 PM (0/0)
Good idea — sjk, October 19 @ 7:16 AM (0/0)
Support for the creation of .air — abugallo, October 18 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:43 PM (1/1)

Support for SITA — coair, October 23 @ 4:12 PM (0/0)

Comments — GeorgesL, October 17 @ 9:55 AM (2/3)

u eat apples and oranges — salaskar, October 21 @ 4:21 PM (1/1)

SITA - nonprofit - get a grip — georgesl, October 23 @ 7:01 AM (0/0)

Response to Comments — RDelgado, October 18 @ 10:41 AM (0/0)

Super proposal — huguesdb, October 16 @ 11:37 PM (0/0)

.biz, etc. Application by Abacus America, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:37 PM (49/99)

ABACUS - Great Concept — ak, 55 minutes ago (0/0)
USA families — mikes, 12:00 AM (0/0)
yes to FAM — henry, 11:52 PM (0/0)
.fam — andyG, 11:44 PM (0/0)
Out of 200 proposed TLDs only one is COOL — kevinY , 11:29 PM (0/0)
.cool — kevinY , 11:20 PM (0/0)
Family — JamesZ , 11:14 PM (0/0)
I Agree (.FAM and .XXX) — tw, 10:36 PM (0/0)
Families need .FAM — sl, 10:22 PM (0/0)
support for .COOL — tn, 9:29 PM (1/1)

Too limited — PHXbird, 10:00 PM (0/0)

.COOL great idea — AFree , 9:21 PM (1/1)

Not international enough — PHXbird, 9:58 PM (0/0)

This is the only application that can reach profitability within the first month - HOW? — griffiths, 6:07 PM (0/0)
IOD issue — useyourhead, 6:47 AM (0/0)
.cool will just be a fad — YankeeFan, Fri 3:31 AM (2/2)

just a fad ? — tn, 10:02 PM (0/0)
Faddish names — twosheds, Fri 5:14 PM (0/0)

.XXX a poor idea — ipguy, Fri 12:10 AM (0/0)
Does Pedro work for Abacus? — YankeeFan, Wed 8:03 AM (3/8)

No pressing need for .FAM ??? — JohnD, Thu 10:06 PM (0/0)
Sorry but you are not fully correct — nickl, Thu 7:12 PM (0/0)
Does it matter — pedro, Wed 8:14 PM (1/5)

Ready to go — cambler, Thu 2:18 AM (1/4)

A few words — useyourhead, Fri 11:27 PM (1/3)

Registry for Review — cambler, Sat 3:08 AM (1/2)

There is nothing there — useyourhead, 6:27 AM (1/1)

will review — useyourhead, 6:29 AM (0/0)

Abacus got it right — pedro, Wed 4:26 AM (0/0)
Yes to .FAM — AndrewK , Tue 9:42 PM (0/0)
Why Abacus for .biz — ChrisK , Tue 9:00 PM (0/0)
About dot .biz and .inc — dimitrov@mailcity.com, Tue 7:44 AM (0/0)
MSNBC.com Pole — domainking, Tue 12:38 AM (0/0)
.COOL — domainking, Mon 11:50 PM (0/0)
Trying to be cool — nickl, October 27 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)
cool — jamesh, October 27 @ 7:31 PM (1/1)

.FAM is the way to go — domainking, October 27 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)

.fam — mikeS, October 27 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
It is very important for ICANN to be fair to the public — alexj, October 26 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
To: saynotoabacus — useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)
EXPERIENCE WITH ABACUS, INC. — vldiaz, October 26 @ 3:07 AM (0/0)
Abacus App — peniel, October 25 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
I like .cool — ChrisK , October 25 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
Different policies for ".biz" portion — Josh Kyle, October 24 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)

ICANN decides not a competitor — Formal Response, October 25 @ 1:03 AM (0/0)

Anyone know who else has it ready to go? — useyourhead, October 23 @ 5:58 AM (1/9)

IOD has been online for over 4 years — cambler, October 23 @ 6:51 AM (3/8)

Image Online Design — Wisdom21, Tue 1:29 AM (0/0)
The technology by Abacus — Formal Response, October 25 @ 1:28 AM (0/0)
registry since 1996? — anonymous, October 24 @ 6:31 AM (2/5)

Refer to the updates ICANN just posted on their web site — wiredz, October 25 @ 10:56 AM (1/1)

This shows that IOD can't use .web as a trademark but does not deny IOD's rights on .web . — fabrcop, October 25 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)

Our support — cambler, October 24 @ 7:50 AM (1/2)

Mr Ambler used the word 'advised' — wiredz, October 25 @ 12:17 AM (1/1)

Response — cambler, October 25 @ 7:45 PM (0/0)

.xxx — MikeS, October 22 @ 10:31 PM (2/2)

.Sex TLD — Satori, October 25 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)
a voluntary association: ".kids" is ok, but a mandatory ".xxx" is not. — markusbaccus, October 24 @ 7:46 PM (0/0)

Young people — nickl, October 22 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)
I agree with jandl — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
BID SYSTEM UNFAIR to UNRICH — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:32 PM (2/2)

This is negotiable — Formal Response, October 25 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
I disagree — pedro, October 23 @ 4:49 AM (0/0)

Sorry for the excessive use of exclamation marks. My only intent was to draw your attention to — SayNoToAbacus, October 21 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)

Strong words — PHXbird, October 21 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)

WWW.NAMES4EVER.COM — Domainking, October 20 @ 7:35 PM (2/2)

I like Names4ever.com — Monya, October 24 @ 3:52 PM (0/0)
Names4ever are excellent. They are one of the BEST — fabiolg, October 24 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)

To saynotoabacus — use your head, October 20 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
.biz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:48 PM (1/1)

bz cannot be the business domain — b. adams, October 23 @ 11:58 PM (0/0)

Comments — sjk, October 19 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
Way to go Abacus! — use your head, October 19 @ 6:19 AM (1/4)

Sounds like you work for Abacus (or were paid to send that message)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 20 @ 12:10 AM (3/3)

where did all the good names go? — anonymous, October 24 @ 5:41 AM (0/0)
Abacus offers superior one on one customer service. — stevexplor, October 20 @ 6:22 AM (0/0)
Hey, enought with the !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — For The People, October 20 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
Abacus is trying to BUY your support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)

Abacus buying support? — PHXbird, October 17 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)

We want to see your application — emc2, October 17 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)
.fam is needed — dconder, October 16 @ 9:11 PM (1/10)

.fam provided by .xxx -- Bad Idea. — bennionjd, October 16 @ 10:52 PM (4/9)

.fam and .xxx — Conway, October 24 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)
FAM is needed, but requests high responsability — Schultz-FAMtld, October 20 @ 8:17 AM (2/2)

Abacus is fit to operate .fam — pedro, October 23 @ 5:25 AM (0/0)
Sorry - Misspelling "Our Website" — Schultz-FAMtld, October 20 @ 8:25 AM (0/0)

your logic is flawed — dconder, October 19 @ 12:33 AM (0/0)
Bad idea is posting opinion without reading the application — pedro, October 17 @ 2:04 AM (1/3)

I've done my reading — bennionjd, October 20 @ 5:43 AM (1/2)

There are no other applicants — dconder, October 23 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)

Not a now-or-never. — bennionjd, October 24 @ 4:57 AM (0/0)

Simply unworkable — jandl, October 16 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
.BIZ applications — korskarn, October 15 @ 4:43 PM (2/4)

missing the point — jandl, October 16 @ 12:13 AM (1/2)

i did not know that — b. adams, October 24 @ 12:10 AM (1/1)

re: I did not know that — jandl, October 29 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)

Strongly disagree — pedro, October 15 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)

Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)

.biz, etc. Application by Affinity Internet, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:30 PM (13/42)

Further Statement in Support of our Application — PhilBerent, 11:50 PM (0/0)
Affinity application — jehlers, October 28 @ 5:07 AM (0/0)
Proposal analysis - Affinity's NAME LOTTERY AND HIGH FEES — TLD Facts, October 26 @ 3:13 PM (1/1)

Identity and Affiliation Please? — PhilBerent, October 26 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)

Affinity App — peniel, October 25 @ 10:58 PM (1/1)

how come — mashala, October 26 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)

Reply — dd5166, October 24 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)
jandl is right. — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
Support for Affinity Proposal — SSattaur, October 21 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
.biz and .ebiz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 5:09 PM (1/9)

The problem of confusion between Cameroon and ".com" — philberent, October 19 @ 8:06 PM (2/8)

.biz — shaoyi, October 20 @ 7:27 PM (0/0)
Confusion between ".bz" and ".biz" — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 9:58 PM (3/6)

You are mistaken — jandl, October 22 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
.BZ marketing — Phxbird, October 20 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
Belize etc — philberent, October 19 @ 11:46 PM (1/3)

.biz and .ebiz would result in confusion — A. Kinney, October 20 @ 4:28 AM (2/2)

.bz exists and so does .BIZ — jandl, October 21 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
Who ARE you? — PhilBerent, October 20 @ 8:14 AM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
.biz exists already people!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:03 AM (1/2)

Not all applications are in conflict — marshm, October 17 @ 4:11 AM (1/1)

True — jandl, October 19 @ 12:06 AM (0/0)

Why not simply say .BIZ will be a mega corp TLD? — jandl, October 16 @ 8:21 PM (1/4)

Mega dogwalkers — PhilBerent, October 16 @ 10:35 PM (3/3)

Leah is an ORSC person — wiredz, October 28 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
honesty? — jandl, October 17 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
Understanding a SOHO — jandl, October 17 @ 1:27 AM (0/0)

application materials page returns "forbidden" error in IE5 — jandl, October 14 @ 7:33 PM (0/0)
Our Application — PhilBerent, October 14 @ 1:18 PM (2/12)

Overcoming cybersquatting and domain name speculation — wiredz, October 28 @ 11:45 AM (0/0)
If you have to choose just one TLD what will it be? — anthony, October 14 @ 1:22 PM (1/10)

TLD string — PhilBerent, October 14 @ 6:57 PM (1/9)

Why would you choose a TLD which already exists? — jandl, October 14 @ 7:32 PM (2/8)

ORSC Root Zone Is ILLEGAL and NOT RECOGNIZED in the eyes of courts — wiredz, October 28 @ 11:30 AM (1/2)

Excuse me. . . — World Thoughts, October 28 @ 11:36 AM (1/1)

It's not even unofficial — jandl, October 29 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)

rootzone? — anthony, October 14 @ 9:38 PM (1/4)

Youcann.org — Ray, October 14 @ 10:09 PM (1/3)

Yawn, not another! — korskarn, October 15 @ 3:36 PM (2/2)

Let's understand the subject before making nonsensical comments — jandl, October 15 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
for your enlightenment — Ray, October 15 @ 7:02 PM (0/0)

.biz, etc. Application by iDomains, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:30 PM (10/19)

costs — may, 10 minutes ago (0/0)
Idomains has a well thought out plan.. — wehberf, 9:15 PM (1/1)

I was just thinking that.. — miles, 9:31 PM (0/0)

Critique of iDomains' Application — PhilBerent, 6:50 PM (1/2)

Somewhat confused?? — wehberf, 9:48 PM (1/1)

Reply and Request for Affiliation — PhilBerent, 11:53 PM (0/0)

iDomains app — peniel, October 25 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
It's called 'prior use.' — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:08 AM (1/4)

Proof Is Needed — wiredz, October 22 @ 1:11 PM (1/3)

who says a domain name has to be used for a website? — jandl, October 27 @ 10:59 PM (1/2)

Here is what is to be considered a "good" registry — wiredz, October 28 @ 12:05 AM (1/1)

ridiculous — jandl, October 29 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)

.biz and .ebiz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:44 PM (1/1)

How would it cause trouble?? I don't think you understand the issue.. — miles, 9:56 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:48 PM (0/0)
Say No TO these .biz applicants. .biz already exists people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:06 AM (1/1)

.biz does not really exist... it's a joke.. — miles, 10:00 PM (0/0)

More CORE? — jandl, October 16 @ 7:27 AM (0/0)
Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)

.biz Application by JVTeam, LLC — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:29 PM (10/14)

Critique of JVTeam Application — Phil Berent, October 27 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
Single TLD extension proposals — peniel, October 25 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
Charter — PhilBerent, October 24 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
first use — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)
.biz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
and MORE CORE and more MONOPOLY and they also want .WEB — jandl, October 19 @ 12:25 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
YOU SHOULD KNOW BY NOW.....BIZ ALREADY EXISTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT IT ICANN!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:08 AM (1/4)

To Saynotoabacus: Why not just admit it? It's obvious. — useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:41 AM (1/3)

There is nothing underground about the ORSC rootzone — jandl, October 27 @ 10:52 PM (1/2)

ORSC Root Zone Is ILLEGAL and NOT RECOGNIZED in the eyes of courts — wiredz, October 28 @ 12:24 AM (1/1)

You just can't resist the ad hominems, can you? — jandl, October 29 @ 8:56 PM (0/0)

application materials same as biz3? — jandl, October 17 @ 2:33 AM (0/0)
Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)

.biz, etc. Application by KDD Internet Solutions Co., Ltd. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:29 PM (9/14)

KDD Internet Co. Ltd. Application — The Walt Disney Company, Fri 11:49 PM (1/1)

? — World Thoughts, Sat 1:44 AM (0/0)

Support to KDD — gbsobrevinas, October 27 @ 1:20 AM (0/0)
KDD app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)
bizEXISTSalready. I agree with the people who say that there is an ORSC conflict. — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)
.biz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:49 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:51 PM (0/0)
and no to KDD! and no to Affinity! and no to Idomains! DO YOU GET THE PICTURE???????????????????? — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:10 AM (0/0)
.home is already in use — marshm, October 15 @ 3:49 AM (1/4)

ORSC is nothing but a bunch of lusers out to destroy the net.... — wiredz, October 22 @ 1:36 PM (2/3)

A note about wiredz... — marshm, October 22 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)
careful, wiredz — marshm, October 22 @ 3:24 PM (1/1)

Impact of Language — PHXbird, October 25 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)

Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)

.cash, etc. Application by Diebold Incorporated — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:28 PM (5/16)

Solid company, solid proposal — lapointe, October 27 @ 1:18 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
Where's the Beef ! — global view, October 18 @ 12:49 AM (1/2)

Plenty of beef — marshm, October 18 @ 3:25 PM (1/1)

More information — marshm, October 18 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)

.CASH, .GLOBAL, .SECURE — marshm, October 17 @ 3:54 AM (1/6)

Lusers at Diebold have boldly attempted to create alternate root... — wiredz, October 22 @ 1:48 PM (3/5)

personal attacks have no business here — Ray, October 23 @ 1:42 AM (1/2)

Ray, I am just revealing the truths about Mr Marsh — wiredz, October 23 @ 4:40 PM (1/1)

Again, a note about wiredz... — marshm, October 23 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)

A note about wiredz... — marshm, October 22 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
The facts obviously elude you, sir — marshm, October 22 @ 3:02 PM (0/0)

Diebold — Ray, October 13 @ 7:16 PM (1/3)

Diebold Application — marshm, October 13 @ 8:08 PM (1/2)

excuse me...? — tim, October 14 @ 12:32 AM (1/1)

still trying to delete but... — tim, October 14 @ 2:52 PM (0/0)

.co-op, etc. Application by Cooperative League of the USA — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:27 PM (273/317)

dot.co-op — Andrew Ferguson, 39 seconds ago (0/0)
support for .coop (and .co-op) — Tim Huet, Sat 11:59 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op! — chunter, Sat 11:14 PM (0/0)
Support .co-op — tsites, Sat 9:22 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — foodfront, Sat 8:04 PM (0/0)
I support .coop — nph, Sat 3:58 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — JSingh, Sat 2:12 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — daystar, Sat 2:39 AM (0/0)
Establish a .co-op TLD — gmoseley, Fri 10:02 PM (0/0)
Support for .coop — Manon Ress, Fri 9:11 PM (0/0)
Yes! to .co-op, says Whole Foods Co-op, Duluth — cvonrabe, Fri 8:22 PM (0/0)
Weaver Street Market Supports dot co-op — weaverst, Fri 5:58 PM (0/0)
.coop — pag, Fri 4:37 PM (0/0)
We need .co-op! — aerforcoops, Fri 3:26 PM (0/0)
.co-op — Chris Pyke, Fri 9:49 AM (0/0)
.co-op domain — pauld, Fri 1:17 AM (0/0)
.co-op designation — bread, Fri 12:59 AM (0/0)
NCGA wants .co-op! — NCGA, Fri 12:45 AM (1/1)

Affirm support for .coop — johneic3, Fri 3:20 PM (0/0)

support for .co-op — Rochelle Prunty, Thu 10:05 PM (1/1)

YES to .co-op - it will help create a more sustainable world — dschramm, Fri 3:39 AM (0/0)

support for ".co-op" — lmaisel, Thu 9:19 PM (0/0)
co-op support — Collision Centers, Thu 7:52 PM (0/0)
Co-op domain — Narci, Thu 6:41 PM (0/0)
.co-op — shane, Thu 5:57 PM (0/0)
coop domain — miguelito, Thu 4:46 PM (0/0)
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association Supports Dot Co-op — ndm0@nreca.org, Thu 3:55 PM (0/0)
CARS Cooperative supports "dot co-op" — CARS, Thu 3:41 PM (0/0)
dot.co-op — goNDdan, Thu 2:41 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — dallas, Thu 8:42 AM (0/0)
.co-op TDL — Mulle, Thu 7:31 AM (0/0)
dot co-op — liz, Thu 2:06 AM (0/0)
.coop — ligacoop, Wed 9:11 PM (0/0)
support — Allen, Wed 8:04 PM (0/0)
.co-op — jpadgham, Wed 8:00 PM (0/0)
support for .co-op — mapa, Wed 7:13 PM (0/0)
up with dot coop — lexcoop, Wed 6:52 PM (0/0)
coop.coop — pgilbertson, Wed 5:01 PM (1/1)

Support for .co-op tld application — elizwedge, Wed 6:43 PM (0/0)

co-op suffix — cps, Wed 4:31 PM (0/0)
Support .co-op — nsadawi, Wed 2:20 PM (0/0)
.co-op, please! — mhuddles, Wed 4:48 AM (0/0)
co-op domain — baggio, Wed 1:20 AM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — JimK, Tue 8:30 PM (0/0)
.co-op as new TLD — Co-op Housing Coalition, Tue 8:00 PM (0/0)
CCUC Support for the .co-op suffix — caldwelr, Tue 6:41 PM (0/0)
Co-operative Futures supports .co-op TLD — kluddecke, Tue 6:08 PM (0/0)
ICA Housing support .co-op tld — ICA Housing, Tue 9:53 AM (0/0)
support for .coop TLD — pazfamily, Tue 7:44 AM (0/0)
Support .co-op — kedberg, Mon 11:27 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op as domain name for co-operative organisations — inmaculada.buendia, Mon 4:35 PM (0/0)
ICA Global Women's Committee supports .co-op tld — ICA GWC, Mon 4:11 PM (0/0)
.co-op or .coop — Nancyr, Mon 3:33 PM (1/1)

Cooperative status requirement for use of .co-op or .coop — jbaugh, Mon 9:03 PM (0/0)

.co-op — lsherrmann, Mon 2:22 PM (0/0)
suffix .co-op supported — Binary, Mon 1:47 PM (0/0)
support for .co-op as domain name for co-operative organisations — ecrp, Mon 1:07 PM (0/0)
support for .co-op — Judith Hourston , Mon 9:42 AM (0/0)
support for co-op — rclendaniel, Mon 6:49 AM (0/0)
Yes for .co-op — NGagnat, Mon 4:58 AM (0/0)
Can you clarify... — huguesdb, October 30 @ 12:37 AM (1/2)

clarification — J Kenney, Mon 1:24 PM (1/1)

Thanks — huguesdb, Tue 1:30 AM (0/0)

In support of Co-op TLD — jnp, October 29 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)
co-op — cnmec_amy, October 29 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
.co-op — pmehnert, October 27 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)
Scottish Co-op support for .co-op TLD — martin.m, October 27 @ 8:08 PM (0/0)
.co-op — PGEC1, October 27 @ 7:08 PM (0/0)
co-op domain name — ronjc, October 27 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
.co-op — Co-Mo, October 27 @ 7:04 PM (0/0)
Coop TLD — caec, October 27 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)
Support for the .co-op TLD application — jbaugh, October 27 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)
Yes for top level domain, .co-op — conklin, October 27 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)
co-op — messmore, October 27 @ 6:01 PM (0/0)
Domain — cdcv, October 27 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
.co-op support — mat5, October 27 @ 5:25 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — gemcinfo, October 27 @ 4:47 PM (1/1)

.co-op — jct, Mon 4:00 PM (0/0)

Yes to .co-op domain — Tamara Mah, October 27 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)
Yes to .co-op — Jane Barnette, October 27 @ 4:09 PM (0/0)
co-op TLD — Michele, October 27 @ 3:33 PM (0/0)
.co-op TDL — broker, October 27 @ 3:28 PM (0/0)
Co-operative (.coop) - excellent — violetlight, October 27 @ 3:01 PM (0/0)
Vote Yes for .Co-op — ouachita, October 27 @ 3:01 PM (1/1)

Co-op TLD — LenBurch, Fri 9:02 PM (0/0)

co-op, etc. Application by Cooperative League of the USA — Luzzatti, October 27 @ 3:01 PM (1/1)

Proposal for a co-op top level domain — Shirley, October 27 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)

Everyone should know about cooperatives — RalphD, October 27 @ 2:59 PM (0/0)
support .co-op — jlowrey, October 27 @ 2:58 PM (0/0)
Caribbean Credit Unions Support .co-op! — dgrace2, October 27 @ 2:32 PM (0/0)
.co-op — isn, October 27 @ 2:25 PM (0/0)
British Credit Unions support .co-op! — dgrace2, October 27 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op and .coop from Adams Electric — adamsec, October 27 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)
coop — scout, October 27 @ 2:12 PM (0/0)
support .co-op — CRC, October 27 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
Welsh Co-operators support .co-op — Alex Bird, October 27 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)
Malaysian Support for .co-op — J Kenney, October 27 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)
Support for .co-op from the Philippines — J Kenney, October 27 @ 12:25 AM (0/0)
elabora, Italy - support for .co-op top level domain — elabora, October 27 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)
Promoting the co-operative advantage — nhomer, October 27 @ 8:43 AM (0/0)
Co-op principles set us apart — ethosetc, October 27 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)
Co-op Domain Name needed Worldwide — White-Cloud, October 27 @ 2:11 AM (0/0)
.coop — lbenander, October 27 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)
Wonderful support — huguesdb, October 27 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)
.co-op support — Franklin REC, October 26 @ 8:43 PM (0/0)
PREA and Allegheny EC Support .co-op! — JZimmerman, October 26 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)
Co-op Atlantic fully supports .co-op — doucdar, October 26 @ 7:15 PM (1/1)

.coop commonality — Karin, Wed 6:42 AM (0/0)

Help support an e-commerce identity for cooperatives — Michelle, October 26 @ 6:05 PM (0/0)
.coop : The Conseil Canadien de la Coopération supports — rltango, October 26 @ 4:04 PM (0/0)
Support for .coop or .co-op — robert.slade, October 26 @ 3:13 PM (0/0)
Support new domain name ".co-op" — RCEC, October 26 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)
We Support .CO-OP — RGEC, October 26 @ 2:30 PM (1/1)

support for .co-op — aitch, Mon 5:07 PM (0/0)

Co-op TLD — Julie Durick, October 26 @ 2:16 PM (0/0)
.co-op will benefit cooperatives, customers — meeker , October 26 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
There is a need for .co-op identity — Cathy, October 26 @ 1:35 PM (0/0)
Confcooperative, Italy - support for .co-op top level domain — confcoop, October 26 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
co-op has a dash and is too long — squish, October 26 @ 1:06 PM (1/1)

app includes .coop as well — J Kenney, October 26 @ 2:47 PM (0/0)

.co-op as top-level domain — Parke, October 26 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)
.co-op essential — Tantric, October 26 @ 11:29 AM (1/1)

yes co-op! not com — sez, October 27 @ 1:42 PM (0/0)

World's Consumer Co-ops supports new domain — cci, October 26 @ 9:59 AM (0/0)
Aussie Support for :dot co-op" — davidg, October 26 @ 5:39 AM (0/0)
.co-op — Richard R. Smith, October 26 @ 12:49 AM (0/0)
.coop extension — peniel, October 25 @ 11:12 PM (0/0)
.co-op — marywallace, October 25 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
Uruguayan cooperatives support the new tld coop — neticoop, October 25 @ 8:44 PM (0/0)
Strong support for co-op TLD — Schwettmann, October 25 @ 7:46 PM (0/0)
dot co-op — Patrice, October 25 @ 7:14 PM (1/1)

In support of .co-op .coop — kag7, October 27 @ 4:07 PM (0/0)

.co-op — checkers4, October 25 @ 7:03 PM (0/0)
.coop — darnholt, October 25 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)
.co-op — seiremc, October 25 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)
What comes after the dot is important — vmoulton, October 25 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)
.co-op — sheco, October 25 @ 4:08 PM (1/1)

.Co-op Support — alester, October 26 @ 7:57 PM (0/0)

dot co-op — OSCAprez, October 25 @ 4:02 PM (0/0)
.co-op top level domain — Tex114Concho, October 25 @ 3:04 PM (0/0)
.co-op — swcc, October 25 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)
COPAC supports .co-op or .coop TLD — COPAC, October 25 @ 2:00 PM (0/0)
Requesting new Internet suffix for electric co-ops — MAM, October 25 @ 1:25 PM (0/0)
.co-op tld -- all for it — alison, October 25 @ 1:03 PM (0/0)
co-op suffix for co-op domain names — jhath, October 25 @ 11:48 AM (0/0)
UK worker co-ops say yes to .CO-OP — bobcannell, October 25 @ 10:42 AM (0/0)
new TLD .co-op should be created — sukalac, October 25 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
ICAO strongly support for .co-op on behalf of World Farmer — ICAO, October 25 @ 6:16 AM (0/0)
Such a fine idea — NACF, October 25 @ 2:55 AM (0/0)
Yes, coop suffix would be useful — Mary , October 24 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)
.co-op domain name — The Fair World Project, October 24 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)
CHF supports .co-op — hbowen4, October 24 @ 7:33 PM (0/0)
CUNA Mutual Group Supports .co-op TLD — larryblanchard, October 24 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
.co-op — MAC, October 24 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)
dot co-op — David J. Thompson, October 24 @ 4:44 PM (1/1)

student housing co-op supports .co-op — stuart baker, October 26 @ 10:05 PM (0/0)

.coop — Jim Ashby, October 24 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)
Co-ops, not the ordinary .org — alleni, October 24 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)
need for .co-op suffix — grammysboy, October 24 @ 4:00 PM (0/0)
Consumer Federation of America and Consumers Union Endorse Internet Suffix for Co-ops — art jaeger, October 24 @ 3:49 PM (0/0)
support for .co-op — mmmelius, October 24 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)
.co-op — clara1, October 24 @ 3:39 PM (0/0)
Yes to co-op tld — gfountain, October 24 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)
YES to .co-op TLD — paulz, October 24 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — danros, October 24 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)
Legacoop, Italy -- support for .co-op — J Kenney, October 24 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD -- yes — wra5438, October 24 @ 1:11 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — jautry@flintemc.com, October 24 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)
coop — Ron Stack , October 24 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
The Brazilian Cooperative Organization Supports .co-op — J Kenney, October 24 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
Co-op designation — CGANE, October 24 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — ICA President, October 24 @ 8:33 AM (2/2)

Singapore support .co-op TLD — Leow Peng Kui, Wed 3:22 AM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — peterhunt, Mon 11:51 AM (0/0)

Co-op domain — CFCBrad, October 24 @ 7:42 AM (0/0)
I support ".co-op" — Ionesco, October 24 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)
".co-op" domain name — WRECA, October 23 @ 11:49 PM (0/0)
.co-op — bbierstedt, October 23 @ 10:37 PM (0/0)
co-op suffix — Wilton 1, October 23 @ 9:59 PM (0/0)
yes to .co-op — dmaxwell, October 23 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
.co-op — john@sec, October 23 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)
.co-op — dhoefer, October 23 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
.co-op application — rbroady, October 23 @ 8:33 PM (0/0)
.co-op — Renee' Brown, October 23 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — WCEC, October 23 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)
support of .co-op — shermajeane, October 23 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
e-commerce identity for cooperatives! — sarah a clark, October 23 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)
Supporting .co-op — randy, October 23 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
.co-op support — kos, October 23 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
Support of Application of Cooperative Leave of USA — Emery Maez, October 23 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)
.co-op — WisFedCoop, October 23 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
Please accept the proposed .co-op TLD — gregm, October 23 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
In support of .co-op — lcline, October 23 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
Of Course! — gabenh, October 23 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
.co-op — mmcwaters, October 23 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
Co-op Domain Name — bernief, October 23 @ 4:30 PM (0/0)
top-level domain for .coop — ralphb, October 23 @ 4:25 PM (0/0)
.co-op — valleyelectric, October 23 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
Please grant this. — Michael Gery, October 23 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
Absolutely — etuttle, October 23 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
co-op domain — Cimarron, October 23 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
.coop TLD — homeworks, October 23 @ 2:17 PM (0/0)
Co-op — donsanders, October 23 @ 2:16 PM (0/0)
the cooperative network — electricexec, October 23 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)
co-op TLD — centralpa, October 23 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
We need .co-op — Choptank, October 23 @ 2:06 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — gbeltt, October 23 @ 2:06 PM (0/0)
Cooperatives are unique form of organization — rkolb, October 23 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
.co-op domain — coopgrocer, October 23 @ 1:33 PM (0/0)
.co-op — krisstring, October 23 @ 1:32 PM (0/0)
Coop domain — mmh, October 23 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)
.co-op — mclaury, October 23 @ 12:59 AM (0/0)
Go .co-op — wattie, October 23 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)
.co-op , TLD — wdbyrec, October 23 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)
Implement co-op as TLD Name — tbrinson, October 23 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)
.co-op is needed — rodneyp, October 23 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)
.co-op use — richard.fay, October 23 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)
.co-op designation — sairis, October 23 @ 12:33 AM (0/0)
We need .co-op — logansr, October 23 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — anduril, October 23 @ 12:20 AM (1/1)

Support of ".co-op" — edm0, October 23 @ 1:41 PM (0/0)

Support for .coop — villamin, October 23 @ 12:05 AM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — fultonm, October 22 @ 11:38 PM (0/0)
@co-op.org — Tonyftp, October 22 @ 10:24 PM (0/0)
support of Co-op top level domain — JLauzon, October 22 @ 9:45 PM (0/0)
.co-op — David Hagert, October 22 @ 3:33 AM (0/0)
Support .co-op — curtiswynn, October 21 @ 10:53 PM (0/0)
Support for ".co-op" — kayebernard, October 21 @ 9:01 PM (0/0)
yes! this makes so much sense. — kedwards28, October 21 @ 7:38 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — cmcalpin, October 21 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)
.co-cp tdl — jsbcmec, October 21 @ 11:41 AM (0/0)
.co-op tld — appliance doctor, October 21 @ 5:32 AM (0/0)
co-op — DKA36, October 21 @ 1:56 AM (0/0)
.co-op acceptance — PHXbird, October 21 @ 1:25 AM (0/0)
CEC Oregon urges approval — mholden, October 20 @ 10:42 PM (0/0)
Please support .co-op TLD — mlareau, October 20 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — Steve Dines, October 20 @ 10:06 PM (0/0)
I support .co-op — nembhard, October 20 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
I support .co-op — markjugg, October 20 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — Yeshe Tsogyel, October 20 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)
I support the .co-op TLD — giszpenc, October 20 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)
MUTUAL AID supports .co-op — Precious, October 20 @ 11:56 AM (0/0)
.co-op — Rita Rich, October 19 @ 10:03 PM (0/0)
.co-op is needed — dogbreath, October 19 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)
New domain .co-op needed for Cooperatives and Credit Unions — StevenKraus, October 19 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)
Support letter for .co-op — Fairbairn, October 19 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)
JCCU(Japan) supports dot co-op — JCCU, October 19 @ 6:48 AM (0/0)
.co-op — bobm, October 19 @ 12:50 AM (0/0)
TLD for Co-ops — jayowick, October 18 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)
we welcome .co-op — footprint, October 18 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
.coop or .co-op, please. — belugaboy, October 18 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)
.co-op — Paul Hazen, October 18 @ 9:41 PM (0/0)
excellent idea! — deniztuncer, October 18 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
.coop — farrken, October 18 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
NAHC supports the .co-op — magates, October 18 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)
International Credit Union Support for .co-op — dgrace, October 18 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)
.coop domain — pardon, October 18 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)
.co-op — scunningham, October 18 @ 3:52 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — Tiedemann, October 18 @ 3:31 PM (0/0)
Yes, .co-op but not .coop — IanEiloart, October 18 @ 3:28 PM (0/0)
newTLD — ninalam, October 18 @ 8:36 AM (0/0)
DOT CO-OP Domain — Robert Docken, October 17 @ 10:39 PM (0/0)
.co-op — 350691, October 17 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — GrahamMitchell, October 17 @ 5:41 PM (4/4)

Support for a .co-op TLD — Brian Webber, October 24 @ 9:06 AM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — Iain Williamson, October 20 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
support for .co-op — dnjohnson, October 18 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)
for .coop — worker, October 17 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)

Message of Support from UK Co-operative Union — Malcolm Corbett, October 17 @ 3:38 PM (1/1)

Support for .co-op — owcfcame@web.ca, October 27 @ 4:28 PM (0/0)

.co-op — Ethical Exchange, October 17 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
C0-op suffix is absolutely essential! — dritaly, October 17 @ 5:58 AM (1/1)

co-op — JMHE, October 24 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)

dot co-op needed — dspanjer, October 16 @ 9:43 PM (0/0)
.co-op suffix — skgibb, October 16 @ 6:36 PM (0/0)
.co-op — jessa, October 16 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)
.coop — sitch, October 16 @ 11:09 AM (0/0)
Internet designation — Norman J. Stockton, October 16 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
.coop — fulton, October 15 @ 8:17 PM (0/0)
.coop — Tom Webb, October 15 @ 3:37 PM (0/0)
Great idea! — kenns, October 14 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
dot coop -- deciding eligibility — hpb, October 14 @ 6:50 AM (1/1)

Dot Co-op -- deciding eligibility — J Kenney, October 16 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)

Are these posts from a co-op Co-Op? — PHXbird, October 14 @ 12:08 AM (2/2)

Tim, try now... then I'll delete this message — marshm, October 14 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
what about Diebold coop? — tim, October 14 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)

.co-op TLD will be used by millions — co-opkid, October 13 @ 11:30 PM (0/0)
.co-op — mmini, October 13 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — Karen Zimbelman, October 13 @ 10:16 PM (2/2)

.co-op — Otis, October 14 @ 3:29 PM (0/0)
.co-op is great news. — Marcy, October 14 @ 2:35 PM (0/0)

Make .co-op a TLD in the first round! — SandyNelson, October 13 @ 10:07 PM (2/3)

I support ".co-op" — Curtis , October 21 @ 6:01 PM (0/0)
Make .co-op a TLD in the first round! Yes — Peter21, October 18 @ 2:29 PM (1/1)

Credit Union Central of Canada — Peter21, October 18 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)

.co-op — matthewplatte, October 13 @ 8:02 PM (1/1)

.co-op — bridge, October 23 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)

Consumers want .co-op! — werhane, October 13 @ 8:02 PM (1/1)

Yes! We want .co-op! — ecomama, October 17 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)

.co-op — jimdel, October 13 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)
.co-op — jwads, October 13 @ 4:33 PM (1/1)

.co-op — nelslonn, Wed 4:49 PM (0/0)

.co-op — sethe, October 13 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
.co-op — mncoop, October 13 @ 3:40 PM (1/1)

dot co-op — UHAB, October 13 @ 4:02 PM (0/0)

Dot co-op TLD — Moser, October 13 @ 3:29 PM (1/1)

Dot.co-op — ccarr, October 16 @ 2:24 PM (0/0)

We need this now! — LauraDines, October 13 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)
.co-op — herbcl, October 13 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — ethosetc, October 12 @ 11:44 PM (3/6)

co-op TLD — maryc, October 22 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)
.co-op designation — phssra, October 13 @ 9:05 PM (1/2)

Co-op 'suffix' — Equaliser, October 14 @ 9:29 AM (1/1)

COMMENTS RE TLD — jacqui, October 17 @ 1:30 PM (0/0)

Co-op TLD — Joel Welty, October 13 @ 7:15 PM (1/1)

.co-op — atel, Sat 6:54 PM (0/0)

.dir Application by Novell, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:27 PM (11/15)

Support .DIR — dakearns, Wed 8:38 PM (0/0)
Directory vendor as .dir authority? — timoldham, Wed 11:45 AM (2/2)

A clean global name space — k.magowan, Fri 4:01 PM (0/0)
The Open Group to Set Domain Policy — wbumpus, Wed 5:17 PM (0/0)

Digital Identity — Tantric, October 26 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
Single TLD extension proposals — peniel, October 25 @ 11:16 PM (1/1)

.dir seems to have a useful place on the net — mohr4me, October 27 @ 5:29 AM (0/0)

Compaq support for .DIR — garyfcampbell, October 25 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
Support for .DIR — cstone, October 24 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)
Privacy and security and other questions — karl.auerbach, October 23 @ 9:32 PM (1/1)

Privacy and Security — dakearns, Wed 8:26 PM (0/0)

To much gloss, not enough detail that I can believe — karl.auerbach, October 23 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
Comments — sjk, October 19 @ 7:37 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)
Core Business — hoffy, October 14 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)

.dot, etc. Application by Neustar, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:26 PM (23/49)

ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness — fabrcop, 10:03 AM (0/0)
Neustar Shoots Self In Foot ... Must Be Disqualified — dcorish, Sat 2:42 PM (0/0)
Neustar/MelbourneIT is Either Lying or the Application is Flawed! — jtrade, Thu 6:21 AM (0/0)
What's That Foul Smell? — jtrade, Wed 9:43 AM (0/0)
.Web,MelbourneIT/Neustar,ICANN Director Greg Crew and Conflict of Interest? — jtrade, Wed 2:19 AM (0/0)
ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world! — fabrcop, Mon 9:07 PM (0/0)
Neustar's application should be accepted - IOD have no legal rights — Alex Williamson, October 26 @ 11:25 PM (3/9)

Are you sure? You should be careful with your reckless arguments — fabrcop, Mon 2:52 PM (0/0)
You didn't explain why Neustar should be accepted...and for what domains? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 27 @ 4:33 AM (0/0)
What breach of copyright? — cambler, October 26 @ 11:34 PM (1/6)

A bit about Prior Use — wiredz, Mon 9:34 AM (5/5)

Apologize, please — cambler, Tue 5:11 AM (0/0)
WiredZ...why didn't you say you were from openSRS — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 4:01 AM (0/0)
Your Credibility, Persuasion & Logic: All Flawed — PHXbird, Mon 9:54 PM (0/0)
Remember, "wiredz" = Racist To Muslims — pilot2, Mon 1:18 PM (0/0)
You're obsessed. — World Thoughts, Mon 10:20 AM (0/0)

Neustar app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:23 PM (0/0)
How fast can Warberg-Pincus, Lockheed Martin & MelbourneIT Turn .WEB into Big $$$ — TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:00 PM (0/0)
MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:51 AM (1/2)

msnbc-meeks-icann — webster, October 26 @ 5:48 PM (1/1)

NeuStar paid for his opinion — cambler, October 26 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)

Where's the Competition — jtrade, October 24 @ 1:40 AM (0/0)
THIS is 1 of the few DECENT PROPOSALS — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)

ICANN Bribery — Merlin, October 21 @ 11:10 PM (0/0)

Bribery? No: they know that IOD deserves of .web — fabrcop, October 20 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)
This is EXACTLY how a monopoly operates...Massive Media ...Get your Econ 101 book out... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 12:27 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:55 PM (1/1)

I disagree: the Internet needs .web and other TLDs IMMEDIATELY — fabrcop, October 20 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)

Neustar,Afilias Bid to Steal .Web — jtrade, October 18 @ 1:49 AM (1/5)

Accept NeuStar's Application! — wiredz, October 18 @ 12:20 AM (2/4)

Inaccuracies — cambler, October 18 @ 7:41 PM (0/0)
IOD's monopoly??! This is curious! — fabrcop, October 18 @ 1:45 PM (1/2)

Read my previous post carefully — wiredz, October 18 @ 3:17 PM (1/1)

Sharing — cambler, October 18 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)

.web concerns — David Coombs, October 17 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
IOD Hypocracy — jjnlaw72, October 17 @ 3:03 PM (5/5)

Dont be so sure — sinbad, Tue 9:34 AM (0/0)
Here is what IOD will do with registrant's who registered AOL.WEB — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 7:35 PM (0/0)
Court Case — jjnlaw72, October 17 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
Court cases? — PHXbird, October 17 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
HYPOCRISY, NOT "HYPOCRACY"... And You Are Wrong — pilot, October 17 @ 3:28 PM (0/0)

Neustar Application Also Involves CORE For .WEB, TRYING TO BRIBE ICANN! — pilot, October 17 @ 1:14 PM (0/0)
Ethical Suicide — Merlin, October 17 @ 9:17 AM (0/0)
Bribery, indeed — For The People, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (1/1)

I concur. Bribery. — larreeee, October 17 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)

Are you attempting to BRIBE ICANN? — jtrade, October 17 @ 6:09 AM (0/0)
Neustar and it's DOT WEB application — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 4:46 AM (1/2)

No To This Application. — Merlin, October 17 @ 5:38 AM (1/1)

Yes, to NeuStar's Application for .WEB — wiredz, October 25 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)

.dubai, etc. Application by Dubai Technology, Electronic Commerce and Media Free Zone Authority — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:26 PM (10/12)

.GO for it ICANN — calcut, 11:09 PM (0/0)
.go gTLD — matseng, 10:16 PM (0/0)
.GO creates better education for daily life through the Internet — Sten Ronnberg, 9:46 PM (1/1)

Not censorship? — PHXbird, 10:22 PM (0/0)

dotgo — AndersF, 7:22 PM (0/0)
.dubai NewTLD — reem, 5:11 PM (1/1)

.dubai is a proposed gTLD not a ccTLD. — DiDRA, 9:22 PM (0/0)

THUMBS UP for .go application — Montclairian, Sat 9:17 AM (0/0)
.go makes a difference — ITELSA, Fri 10:34 PM (0/0)
Two character gTLDs should be reserved for future (protential) ccTLDs — mikel5, October 26 @ 2:01 PM (0/0)
Dubai app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:01 PM (0/0)

.event Application by Internet Events International, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:25 PM (20/31)

Support for .event. — jlasko, 9:36 AM (0/0)
Support for .event; User friendly way to navigate the Internet — JL Enterprises, Sat 10:32 PM (0/0)
Support for .event — Mr.Looney, Sat 8:14 PM (0/0)
Businesses NEED .Event — kandl, Sat 7:11 PM (0/0)
.EVENT — Technomancer, Thu 6:44 PM (0/0)
Support for .event — Guide International, Wed 7:41 PM (0/0)
Most versatile TLD proposed — FAguirre, Mon 7:26 PM (0/0)
support for .event — asthoreth, Mon 4:49 PM (0/0)
NZ Supports Event — tania torea, October 29 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)
UNANIMOUS SUPPORT FOR .EVENT — People For Domain Ethics, October 29 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
supportfor.event. — groove69, October 29 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
support for .event — marcus, October 27 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)
support of .event — Petunia, October 27 @ 3:10 AM (0/0)
AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS .event! — Jordan, October 27 @ 2:44 AM (0/0)
Makes sense — shondratasha, October 26 @ 4:12 AM (0/0)
.event app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:29 PM (2/2)

Please read their entire BP... — People For Domain Ethics, October 29 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)
Narrow??? — worldexpos, October 26 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)

Excellent idea for ordering web chaos-restricted TLD's! — mohr4me, October 25 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)
Support for .event — ElectricSmash, October 23 @ 8:02 PM (1/1)

Support for .event — Reynaiel, October 25 @ 5:00 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:02 PM (0/0)
Should be denied — jandl, October 14 @ 8:00 PM (3/8)

Please clarify your viewpoint... — People For Domain Ethics, October 29 @ 7:12 PM (0/0)
Formal Response — Approve.Event, October 25 @ 8:45 PM (2/2)

Reply to Loren Hollingsworth and All (LONG) — quasar, 4:50 PM (0/0)
Mr Hollingsworth, your explanation is excellent! — wiredz, October 28 @ 1:40 PM (0/0)

Owned? — KMalorny, October 17 @ 8:18 AM (1/3)

Semantics — jandl, October 19 @ 12:45 AM (1/2)

Support for *.event — worldexpos, October 20 @ 4:37 PM (1/1)

Official? — jandl, 4:45 AM (0/0)

.fin Application by Association Monegasque des Banques — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:24 PM (7/13)

Objection to .FIN Proposal by FDIC — jcrum, Sat 6:41 PM (1/1)

answer to fdic — mathieu, 4:22 PM (0/0)

OBJECTION — SWIFT, Fri 5:29 PM (1/1)

answer to swift — mathieu, 5:38 PM (0/0)

OBJECTION — Harasse, Thu 8:02 AM (1/1)

answer to afb — mathieu, 4:39 PM (0/0)

OBJECTION FOR THIS APPLICATION ! — CFONB, October 26 @ 3:13 PM (1/1)

answer to cfonb objection — mathieu, 9:54 AM (0/0)

Serious Concerns With this Application — TLD Facts, October 26 @ 2:23 PM (1/1)

answer to TLD facts — mathieu, 10:13 AM (0/0)

.fin proposal — peniel, October 25 @ 11:32 PM (1/1)

answer tp peniel — mathieu, 3:52 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)

.find, etc. Application by Monsoon Assets Limited (BVA) dba dotYP, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:24 PM (6/10)

PRESS RELEASE - NEW TOP LEVEL DOMAIN CANDIDATE dotYP — dansokol, Sat 12:02 AM (0/0)
YES to .YP - YES TO NEW UNIVERSAL, EFFICIENT and EASY TO USE gTLD's. — Juan Pablo Calvo, Fri 8:14 PM (0/0)
PRESS RELEASE - Comments from Steve Wozniak — dansokol, October 27 @ 1:41 AM (0/0)
Two character gTLDs should be reserved for future (protential) ccTLDs — mikel5, October 26 @ 2:04 PM (1/3)

Two character TLD's already in use by non-ccTLD's — dansokol, October 26 @ 11:14 PM (1/2)

No, all current two character gTLDs are RESERVED for ccTLDs — mikel5, October 27 @ 6:37 PM (1/1)

Two character TLD's — dansokol, October 27 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)

monsoon app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:36 PM (1/1)

monsoon app — dansokol, October 27 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:04 PM (0/0)

.firm, etc. Application by Eastern Communications Company Limited — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:23 PM (7/17)

Eastern's app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)
THIS 1 AIN'T BAD FOLKS — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:03 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:06 PM (0/0)
China communist party owned company? — emc2, October 17 @ 3:50 PM (0/0)
If you had only one choice for a suffix, what would it be? — emc2, October 17 @ 3:57 AM (0/0)
Geographic Diversity — kent, October 14 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)
.news — BrianC, October 14 @ 7:15 AM (1/10)

News is a Higgs Communications TLD - ORSC rootzone — jandl, October 14 @ 8:12 PM (1/9)

I see your point — BrianC, October 15 @ 12:08 AM (1/8)

I don't think you do see the point — marshm, October 15 @ 5:34 AM (2/7)

Diebold and Simon Higgs out to sue and sabotage ICANN — wiredz, October 25 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)
Let the courts decide — BrianC, October 15 @ 8:18 AM (2/5)

ORSC Is illegitimate in the eyes of courts — wiredz, October 25 @ 4:41 PM (0/0)
You are really missing the point — jandl, October 16 @ 12:56 AM (1/3)

Leah is yet another ORSC luser — wiredz, October 25 @ 4:30 PM (1/2)

LUSER. — moster, Fri 2:04 AM (1/1)

"Luser" — PHXbird, Fri 5:09 PM (0/0)

.geo Application by SRI International — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:22 PM (23/28)

Letter of Support — cgshepard, 49 minutes ago (0/0)
SRI Comments regarding dot-geo — dot-geo, 12:03 AM (0/0)
Is this TLD really needed? — sking, 10:09 PM (0/0)
the dot-geo and its potential positive effects — Spaceman, 9:53 PM (0/0)
Technical and Institutional Reservations concerning .geo — kottman, Sat 9:20 PM (0/0)
Support for .Geo Proposal — LStephens, Sat 7:03 PM (0/0)
Policy Questions About dot.geo — jmoeller, Fri 8:21 PM (0/0)
Towards Transparency: Figuring Out the Corporate Parentage & Value Proposition of Dot.Geo — Bruce Cahan, Fri 5:37 PM (0/0)
A GIS ezine looks at .geo — Adena, Thu 10:32 PM (0/0)
.geo plus .i = ? — adoyle, Tue 8:23 PM (0/0)
Doubts about .geo TLD — ddnebert, Mon 4:33 PM (0/0)
Web3D Consortium supports .geo — neiltrevett, October 29 @ 6:32 AM (0/0)
.geo and education — BlackLineFish, October 26 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)
Letter of support — dimo, October 26 @ 10:49 AM (0/0)
Sri's .geo app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:55 PM (0/0)
Letter of Support — WSchwaderer, October 25 @ 3:07 PM (0/0)
Criticism of the SRI .geo proposal — steve_l, October 24 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
Support for .geo by X3D & NPS — brutzman, October 19 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
Digital Earth comment on .geo — Percivall, October 19 @ 2:30 PM (1/1)

Support for .geo under broader umbrella — neal, October 21 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
.geo Application by SRI International — rhyne, October 18 @ 11:14 AM (0/0)
.geo & e-tourism — jachia, October 17 @ 2:21 PM (0/0)
.geo application web site at www.dotgeo.org — Martin, October 14 @ 12:24 AM (1/4)

.geo — aeta, October 16 @ 5:20 PM (1/3)

.geo and SUSTAINABLE tourism — olihillel, October 19 @ 8:52 AM (1/2)

Support for .geo from Earth II and SNS — sns, October 21 @ 12:15 AM (1/1)

.geo applications — asteed, October 24 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)

.health Application by the World Health Organization — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:22 PM (39/46)

WHO's response to concerns — dzenowagisj, 10:38 PM (0/0)
Support .health — MediaMentor ICANN @Large Member # 375469, 7:33 PM (0/0)
UK Health Online — simong, Fri 10:06 PM (1/1)

support to WHO application — Chen CM, 8:54 AM (0/0)

dot.health--WHO Top Level Domain Name Application — Arnold I. Friede, Fri 3:13 PM (0/0)
Yes to .health TLD — Jim Jacobson, Fri 3:03 PM (0/0)
.health — lhanmer, Fri 2:40 PM (0/0)
Are we sure? — sshoop, Fri 4:20 AM (1/1)

Well said — PHXbird, Fri 3:45 PM (0/0)

support for .health — nschwalbe, Thu 11:27 PM (0/0)
support .health — Lienne, Thu 2:16 PM (0/0)
.health Application by the World Health Organisation — risk, Thu 9:50 AM (0/0)
Support of WHO sponsored .health TLD — CKing, Thu 7:43 AM (0/0)
.health for credible online health information — dr_anuj, Thu 5:05 AM (0/0)
.healt TLD — jsmith8695, Wed 2:46 AM (1/1)

.health for credible online health information — dr_anuj, Thu 5:23 AM (0/0)

dot-health — bleavy, Tue 6:55 PM (0/0)
WHO-needs time; spend resources differently — Fiona McLean, Tue 6:35 PM (0/0)
TLD Health — Holtster, Tue 9:36 AM (0/0)
YES to WHO's application for ".health" — rmburian, Tue 2:16 AM (0/0)
Support for .health — eohtlg, Mon 7:12 PM (0/0)
Yes to .health domain — Telehealth Rehab Ltd., Mon 6:18 PM (0/0)
dot health domain — mgenova, Mon 5:14 PM (0/0)
Strong Support for .health — C.P. Green, Mon 5:03 PM (0/0)
.health TLD — hssjes, Mon 1:16 PM (0/0)
Strong support for .HEALTH — Chinarock, October 28 @ 7:36 PM (0/0)
Health TLD — enoji, October 28 @ 3:56 PM (1/1)

.health TLD — Sr. Mary Elizabeth, October 29 @ 2:17 PM (0/0)

Support for .Health TLD — Bogey, October 28 @ 10:34 AM (0/0)
Support — JGoswell, October 28 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
Another Outlook — wbell, October 28 @ 9:07 AM (0/0)
.health TLD - better or worse? — Ray Armstrong, October 28 @ 7:51 AM (0/0)
support the concept — mwillis, October 28 @ 5:16 AM (0/0)
Opposition to WHO top level domain proposal for .health — Dr. Lewis Eigen, October 28 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
.health top level domain — mmherbst, October 27 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)
TLD .health — lgeffen, October 27 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
Support WHO application for .health — delgadojx, October 27 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
Strong support for .HEALTH — anyuser2, October 27 @ 6:05 PM (0/0)
.health TLD - WHO as the sponsoring organization — nand, October 27 @ 2:09 PM (0/0)
.health — fantsuam foundation - Nigeria, October 26 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
WHO app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)
CORE Financials — Need2Know2, October 21 @ 10:03 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:08 PM (1/3)

qualification of medical information sources? — Bruce Speyer, October 29 @ 7:15 PM (1/2)

Good consultative process is the key — Bunjie, Wed 12:36 AM (1/1)

support, concerns echoed, what about complimentary medicine? — vital, Fri 2:06 PM (0/0)

.i Application by Sarnoff Corporation — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:21 PM (30/38)

.i TLD and Single Letters — B. Ferns, 8:41 PM (0/0)
A completely outsourced solution - with some interesting costs — griffiths, 8:09 PM (0/0)
Time for a people-centric TLD — skey, 7:42 PM (0/0)
a badly needed idea!!! — spareek, 5:09 PM (0/0)
.i proposal — manishie, 5:04 PM (0/0)
Delighted by the .i submission from Sarnoff — rp@1sta.net, 9:57 AM (0/0)
Support for this application and some suggestions — steve smith, Sat 1:06 PM (0/0)
A powerful structure for ubiquitous personal communications. — d_reininger, Sat 12:30 AM (0/0)
people centric TLD for connecting people - great concept — mott, Fri 9:31 PM (0/0)
MESSAGE — simonb, Fri 6:42 PM (1/1)

I can see the equality angle in dot i. — snowman, 10:18 PM (0/0)

Support for .i tld — Wendy Suen, Fri 5:57 PM (0/0)
Great Concept! — phillipgb, Fri 5:51 PM (1/1)

The non-transferability provision is good — user106, 11:03 PM (0/0)

Agreement that .i makes strategic sense for the Internet — JNathenson, Fri 1:19 PM (1/1)

support for .i tld application — Andy_Grein, 5:14 AM (0/0)

.i proposal from sarnoff — jcienski, Fri 1:08 PM (0/0)
.i Proposal from Sarnoff Corporation. — jtodd, Wed 6:09 PM (0/0)
.i is good for the internet — Donovan, Wed 12:18 AM (1/1)

.i is a great idea — vachanip, Fri 5:17 AM (0/0)

Help solve the glut of domain names — pdesilva, Wed 2:53 AM (0/0)
New People centric TLD .i — ThomasGeorge, Tue 8:54 PM (0/0)
.geo plus .i = ? — adoyle, Tue 8:23 PM (1/1)

Sarnoff and SRI operate as independent entities — Proposal Team, 11:31 PM (0/0)

TLD for individuals, an excellent idea. — AmitKapoor, Mon 3:22 PM (0/0)
.i could be my buddy. — vpincus, Mon 2:40 PM (0/0)
.i for the masses. — JosephMathew, October 26 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)
Single character gTLDs are a bad idea — mikel5, October 26 @ 1:52 PM (1/3)

What's wrong with single-character TLDs? — jpolaski, October 27 @ 4:28 AM (1/2)

I believe 1 character gTLDs will be hard to use — mikel5, October 27 @ 6:46 PM (1/1)

.i single digit tld — vpincus, Mon 3:02 PM (0/0)

Sounds great, but what about user and community control ? — Dom, October 26 @ 8:28 AM (0/0)
.i proposal — peniel, October 26 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)
What values are envisioned to be associated with .i names? — McQuilWP, October 25 @ 8:40 PM (0/0)
.i proposal works for the developing world — shyam, October 24 @ 6:53 AM (0/0)
Bad idea — sjk, October 19 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
Great application and concept — huguesdb, October 16 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)

.info, etc. Application by Afilias, LLC — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:21 PM (57/145)

Afilias must WAIT! — first1, 3:45 PM (0/0)
ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness — fabrcop, 10:06 AM (0/0)
.info to Afilias & .web to IODesign — H, Fri 11:12 PM (1/1)

I agree (I can see my words in this post... :-) — fabrcop, Sat 1:04 PM (0/0)

VOTE YES to .WEB, YES to .SITE but NO to AFILIAS — Anthony 2nd, Fri 8:52 PM (1/1)

.web to IOD! — first1, Sat 10:56 PM (0/0)

......Regarding .WEB: Vote YES to Image Online Design // Vote NO to Afilias ! — icann_, Wed 11:31 PM (0/0)
Regarding .WEB: Vote YES to Image Online Design // Vote NO to Afilias — y2k, Wed 11:21 PM (0/0)
....Regarding .WEB: Vote NO to Afilias // Vote YES to Image Online Design ! — y2k, Wed 10:47 PM (0/0)
ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world! — fabrcop, Mon 9:10 PM (0/0)
ZDNet picks up the Meeks Article — vdfman, October 26 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)
Don't change the RRP right now — mikel5, October 26 @ 2:31 PM (0/0)
Tell it like it is! Moderator? — first1, October 26 @ 12:09 AM (2/2)

NSI Can Never Get Enough Of The Internet Pie- ICANN, Beware! — aaaswt, Fri 6:06 AM (0/0)
In all fairness — For The People, October 26 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)

MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:54 AM (1/2)

msnbc-meeks-icann — webster, October 26 @ 5:51 PM (1/1)

Who Made You God? — enforcer, October 26 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)

Read This About NSI, For Perspective On Afilias Application — pilot2, October 24 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
Where's the Competition? — jtrade, October 24 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
Why the moderator does not have a real name ?? — debug, October 24 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)
NSI Cybersquatting — jtrade, October 23 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)
The last thing you want — Say_No_To_Afilias, October 23 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)
Tucows and Register.com submit letter expressing concern over Agreements between ICANN/NSI — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 11:19 PM (1/2)

More good dialogue concerning NSI and it's agreements with ICANN/DOC — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 11:27 PM (1/1)

To be fair... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 11:51 PM (0/0)

SAY NO TO .WEB — SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:44 PM (4/10)

Grant Afilias .INFO // Grant Image Online Design .WEB — worldwide, Thu 7:14 AM (0/0)
Say YES to .WEB: Vote YES to IOD // Vote NO to Afilias — y2k, Wed 10:54 PM (0/0)
Say no to .web? — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:02 PM (2/3)

Expired Domain Scandal — debug, October 24 @ 1:42 AM (0/0)
Nope. . . not affiliated with Afilias — For The People, October 22 @ 8:21 PM (1/1)

I agree. — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

You know. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 6:12 PM (1/3)

?!? — SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 6:35 PM (2/2)

Additionally. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)
Sir. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)

Doesn't anyone find it odd that. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 2:47 PM (2/3)

Lack Of Afilias Participation — pilot, October 23 @ 1:30 PM (0/0)
Interesting point you bring up — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:34 PM (1/1)

11th Hour Posting — enforcer, October 22 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)

Afilias - open and fair — gpine, October 21 @ 8:17 AM (2/3)

let's talk about open and fair — Ray, October 22 @ 1:36 PM (1/1)

Mike Roberts speaks to the issue — Ray, October 24 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)

Afilias=millionaires to billionaires! — first1, October 21 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)

Sherman & Clayton Antitrust Acts & Afilias — Merlin, October 21 @ 3:54 AM (1/1)

Ken Stubbs, CORE, ICANN, iDomains, DomainBank, NSI — first1, October 21 @ 4:24 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:10 PM (1/2)

I disagree: the Internet needs .web and other TLDs IMMEDIATELY — fabrcop, October 20 @ 3:55 PM (1/1)

With All Do Respect — Pistoff, October 20 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)

.web concerns — David Coombs, October 17 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)

Great Points! — Ray, October 18 @ 1:42 AM (0/0)

Comments about Network Solutions....from another board (verifying what we are saying ICANN) — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)
500,000 Domains Stolen By Trademark? Holders During Sunrise Period — enforcer, October 17 @ 8:35 AM (0/0)
AFILIAS.TV!!!!!! WHAT A GREAT IDEA!!!!!!!! THIS IS SO ACCURATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:22 AM (0/0)
SAY NO TO AFILIAS and YES TO IOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IOD is the future of the internet!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
Image Online Design should get .web — martindali, October 16 @ 10:48 PM (1/2)

Image Online Design = web domain — balzan, October 17 @ 1:40 AM (1/1)

I don't think so — slickie1, Mon 8:37 AM (0/0)

Vote NO to Afilias — joanna lane, October 16 @ 10:30 PM (1/3)

VOTE YES TO AFILIAS — wiredz, October 28 @ 2:34 PM (2/2)

VOTE NO TO AFILIAS // VOTE YES TO IOD — y2k, Wed 11:06 PM (0/0)
Vote NO to afilias - & to wiredz — PHXbird, Mon 10:27 PM (0/0)

KEN STUBBS - CONFLICT OF INTEREST! — md, October 16 @ 10:10 PM (0/0)
Fuzzy looking numbers — Ray, October 16 @ 4:36 AM (2/5)

Financial Conclusions.... — Ray, October 17 @ 4:15 AM (0/0)
Unsound Business Plan — Merlin, October 16 @ 7:02 AM (1/3)

maybe not so unsound? — Ray, October 19 @ 3:19 AM (1/2)

Business Plan — David Coombs, October 19 @ 5:37 PM (1/1)

with all due respect... — Ray, October 21 @ 1:03 PM (0/0)

Afilias should have changed their name to>>> — Merlin, October 16 @ 12:58 AM (0/0)
Toubling Aspects Of Afilias Application — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 8:17 PM (1/2)

Additional Remark — TheWebster2, October 16 @ 4:38 PM (1/1)

Agreement — PHXbird, October 16 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)

Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? — friedrich, October 15 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)
FORGET THIS EMOTIONAL RHETORIC -- LETS LOOK AT THE FACTS — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:37 AM (3/3)

CAPS LOCK — PHXbird, October 17 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)
Please don't shout! — first1, October 17 @ 2:08 AM (0/0)
OK...look at this fact... — Ray, October 15 @ 3:26 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubs - Insider — TheWebster, October 15 @ 9:38 AM (0/0)
THIS APPLICATION IS BAD FOR YOU, AND THE INTERNET — Frank S., October 15 @ 1:56 AM (2/3)

Objective party says "This 1 is FAIR" — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:12 PM (1/1)

Objective? I Don't Think So ... — pilot, October 21 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)

CAN'T AGREE MORE — pedro, October 15 @ 8:17 AM (0/0)

I support Afilias and registered Afilias.web today! — Stoertebeker, October 14 @ 9:09 PM (1/1)

??h — cello, October 15 @ 6:04 AM (0/0)

TO ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot WEB/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 7:02 PM (1/7)

How is $5.99 a registration going to stabilize the internet!! Anti-Competitive--Microsoftish.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 11:15 PM (1/6)

What they are saying is one thing...but will do another — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:28 AM (1/5)

Please get your facts straight — BrianC, October 15 @ 5:47 AM (2/4)

BrianC, please check your facts — cambler, October 16 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
NameBargain problems — PHXbird, October 15 @ 4:56 PM (2/2)

New "Manage My Account" Area — BrianC, October 15 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
Here is a link to another dissatisfied NameBargain (i.e Register.com) customer.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 11:05 PM (0/0)

ICANN SCAMMED OUT OF ($950,000) BY AFILIAS CARTEL! — AdvantaTel, October 14 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)
CORE — first1, October 14 @ 6:11 PM (1/1)

This is not true — KMalorny, October 16 @ 9:24 AM (0/0)

KEN STUBS TESTIMONY — first1, October 14 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)
More (illegal) Domain Name hoarding by NSI (=Afilias)? — Rebeka, October 14 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
Can Afilias Really Execute??? — TheWebster, October 14 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)
WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this. — cgrady, October 14 @ 7:01 AM (3/4)

Incorrect, please try again. — JoJo Names, October 23 @ 10:20 PM (1/1)

Yes, it is correct — cambler, October 23 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)

Thank U for that summary — 4icann, October 22 @ 4:58 AM (0/0)
Here read this................. — Webster, October 14 @ 9:31 AM (0/0)

Sunrise Period and Afilias is Bad News!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Merlin, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/1)

Thank-you for a thoughtful analysis — huguesdb, October 15 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)

TO ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Afilia.net is a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 5:09 AM (0/0)
TUCOWS has Sold Out! — Merlin, October 14 @ 4:51 AM (1/1)

More TUCOWS info — Merlin, October 14 @ 4:59 AM (0/0)

DOT WEB will be tied up in court and new bid process for years — dsigala, October 14 @ 3:47 AM (3/11)

Paranoid? Who's paranoid??? — anthony, October 14 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)
Great post by dsigala! — fabrcop, October 14 @ 1:58 PM (0/0)
Read This! — first1, October 14 @ 4:19 AM (1/8)

Your CLUELESS — webster, October 14 @ 7:33 AM (2/7)

WAKE UP! — first1, October 14 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
WEBSTER, HERE'S THE COMPETITION — pilot, October 14 @ 11:13 AM (2/5)

agreed — anthony, October 14 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)
IOD=Monopoly — Webster, October 14 @ 11:50 AM (2/3)

WEBSTER, WHY I MISSED OUT ON CHANDELIERS.NET & CHANDELIER.NET — pilot, October 14 @ 2:18 PM (0/0)
IOD=Monopoly?! This is absurd! — fabrcop, October 14 @ 2:08 PM (1/1)

IF .WEB REGISTRATIONS NOT ALLOWED, LET'S RECALL ALL .COMs, NETs, and ORGs — pilot, October 14 @ 2:26 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs & Conflict of Interest Policy — RDM, October 14 @ 3:05 AM (3/6)

READ KEN STUBBS'S SWORN TESTIMONY AGAINST NSI. WHAT, ME WORRY? — pilot, October 14 @ 11:29 AM (0/0)
Afilias/Ken Stubbs proposal reeks of insider politics — Merlin, October 14 @ 6:53 AM (0/0)
Lack of Internal Controls at ICANN? — TheWebster, October 14 @ 6:02 AM (1/3)

Lack of Internal Controls at ICANN? — TheWebster, October 14 @ 7:32 AM (1/2)

Very alarming.... — Ray, October 14 @ 2:47 PM (1/1)

Response to Ray — TheWebster, October 15 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)

TO The ICANN Board Members — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 13 @ 11:44 PM (1/1)

David and Goliath? — first1, October 14 @ 4:28 AM (0/0)

Afilias, A New Cartel! — AdvantaTel, October 13 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
Internet Stability? — Ray, October 13 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
Afilias.TV - Is this their new web site?? — spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:16 PM (2/2)

Free Speech and Afilias.tv — Merlin, October 14 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)
who are you gonna trust? — getserious, October 13 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)

Anti-Trust Concerns — Merlin, October 13 @ 8:02 PM (1/1)

Anti-trust, etc. — PHXbird, October 13 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs and the Conflict of Interest — Merlin, October 13 @ 7:42 PM (3/6)

GREAT AFTERNIC POST... — pilot, October 14 @ 11:46 AM (2/3)

Possible Prelude to Plan by ICANN — RDM, October 15 @ 9:03 AM (1/1)

Hmmm...... — For The People, October 15 @ 11:23 PM (0/0)

Press Releases — PHXbird, October 15 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)

I agree with Merlin 100% — saskia, October 13 @ 11:24 PM (0/0)
Fact Finding Mission — RDM, October 13 @ 10:32 PM (0/0)

.kids Application by Blueberry Hill Communications, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:19 PM (5/6)

Do people support Blueberry Hill? — nicholasmoraitis, Wed 12:42 AM (0/0)
kids domain - general observations — john.carr, October 25 @ 2:06 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:13 PM (0/0)
Six things a .kids proposal should contain — nicholasmoraitis, October 17 @ 1:46 AM (1/1)

Blueberry Hill Communications Proposal — Blueberry Hill, October 21 @ 1:04 AM (0/0)

.KIDS TLD Application Should Be Denied - details inside... — ron10000, October 14 @ 5:20 PM (0/0)

.kids Application by DotKids, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:18 PM (20/27)

DotKids, Inc. providing Industry Friendly solution that promotes competition — DKI, 12:00 AM (0/0)
DotKids, Inc. Statement on Freedom of Expression, Filters, and Censorship — DKI, 10:37 PM (0/0)
DotKids, Inc. Statement - How Our Unrestricted .kids gTLD Works — DKI, 10:20 PM (0/0)
Good step in the right direction — S. Crowther, Fri 3:56 PM (0/0)
Teachers Need This!!! — ahowell, Thu 8:01 PM (0/0)
dotkids great — vittony, Wed 6:55 PM (0/0)
What a wonderful idea — quiktan, Wed 12:45 AM (1/2)

Unlikely to solve underlying issues. — ipguy, Fri 7:21 AM (1/1)

Kids and .kids. — World Thoughts, Sat 1:23 AM (0/0)

Support for DotKids — AJS, Mon 3:37 PM (0/0)
I support DotKids concept — C.Mann, October 29 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)
No Substance - No Experience - Porn Star Endorsement ??? — Neo, October 27 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)
Another Vote for DOTKIDS — DLD, October 27 @ 1:10 PM (0/0)
.kids tld - general observations — john.carr, October 27 @ 9:02 AM (0/0)
Use of my name in the application...I am not working with this group! — Parry Aftab, October 23 @ 4:52 AM (1/1)

Clarification; DotKids, Inc. — DKI, October 27 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)

Good point! — ipguy, Fri 12:49 AM (0/0)

IT'S ABOUT OUR KIDS ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, October 18 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)
This is revolutionary — hedeer, October 17 @ 2:14 PM (2/2)

Not revolutionary, just Status Quo — DRM, October 24 @ 8:33 PM (0/0)
Thank you for the A++; ICANN Refinement process and Revolution — Aimee Correnti, October 17 @ 11:57 PM (0/0)

Very Interesting — slassre, October 16 @ 10:10 PM (0/0)
.KIDS TLD Application Should Be Denied - details inside... — ron10000, October 14 @ 5:22 PM (1/1)

DotKids, Inc. response re: Application Should be Denied — Aimee Correnti, October 16 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)

A "YES" Vote For This One! — AdvantaTel, October 14 @ 12:32 AM (0/0)
It could be the solution for Kids — Carlos, October 13 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)

.kids, etc. Application by ICM Registry, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:18 PM (15/40)

kids and xxx should be added with precautions taken — daimonic, Fri 8:06 AM (0/0)
XXX and KIDS are the reason NOT to do this — Lindy Kathlyn, Fri 2:58 AM (1/1)

Read the Proposal — mpalage, Fri 6:45 AM (0/0)

COPA Commission should support your proposal — jodybresgi, Tue 8:56 PM (0/0)
ICM Registry has the best Proposal Hands Down — Neo, October 27 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)
Its about time — MJ, October 27 @ 3:37 PM (0/0)
.kids tld - general observation — john.carr, October 27 @ 9:03 AM (1/2)

Consensus building will take time — hendeles, Mon 7:40 PM (1/1)

Why? — nicholasmoraitis, Wed 12:36 AM (0/0)

Important first step to cleaning up the internet! — Talya, October 25 @ 5:36 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)
ICM .kids — algajola24, October 17 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)
About time! ICM plan positive for content providers — r9stein, October 17 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
I am Against this application/More Network Solutions involvement — Merlin, October 17 @ 1:51 AM (0/0)
.kids — drdjklein, October 16 @ 7:55 PM (2/2)

.kids — jschulich, October 17 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
I agree — hedeer, October 17 @ 3:26 PM (0/0)

KIDS TLD APPLICATION SHOULD BE ACCEPTED — franmail, October 16 @ 1:18 PM (1/2)

.KIDS and .XXX can work well — Bob-Ottawa, October 16 @ 7:19 PM (1/1)

Business/dollar mix of kids and porn is revolting, with possible social downturn — mystwoman, Wed 1:07 AM (0/0)

Review ICM Registry's Submission to ICANN at www.icmregistry.com — Hendeles, October 15 @ 5:09 PM (3/14)

It is a bit strange.... — huguesdb, October 17 @ 1:16 AM (1/1)

Thinking Outside the Box — mpalage, October 17 @ 2:52 AM (0/0)

not a good combination — slassre, October 16 @ 7:07 PM (1/5)

.XXX AND .KIDS ARE NOT COMBINED — Hendeles, October 17 @ 12:57 AM (1/4)

insincere intentions — brahim_m, October 18 @ 8:11 PM (1/3)

Please make constructive comments — Hendeles, October 20 @ 7:24 PM (1/2)

a few questions, ICM & NSI — hedeer, October 21 @ 12:15 AM (1/1)

.xxx & .kids MUST work together to categorize Internet content — Hendeles, October 24 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)

Highly odd — nicholasmoraitis, October 16 @ 7:11 AM (1/5)

ICM REGISTRY RESPONSE - Our proposal is to improve the Internet — Hendeles, October 16 @ 9:42 PM (1/4)

response — nicholasmoraitis, October 17 @ 12:02 AM (1/3)

Dot Kids Inc. — hedeer, October 21 @ 12:17 AM (1/2)

ICM Registry proposal comments only please! — Hendeles, October 24 @ 11:17 PM (1/1)

I'm only trying to be informative — hedeer, October 25 @ 1:37 AM (0/0)

.KIDS TLD Application Should Be Denied - details inside... — ron10000, October 14 @ 5:23 PM (1/4)

Red-Light & Green Space TLDs (Fact v. Fiction) — mpalage, October 17 @ 2:42 AM (1/3)

Can you clarify please? — nicholasmoraitis, October 17 @ 3:29 AM (2/2)

OPEN & TRANSPARENT REGISTRATION POLICY — Hendeles, October 17 @ 6:18 AM (0/0)
Clarification — mpalage, October 17 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)

.kids Application by .KIDS Domains, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:18 PM (49/75)

Kids Domain Needs to Happen — LarsTheViking, 12:01 AM (0/0)
BETTER CONTENT FOR OUR KIDS.... IT'S TIME ! — spideyg, 11:58 PM (0/0)
Conclusions and Final Thoughts — pagehowe, 11:38 PM (0/0)
Porn in the Children's Section at the Public Library? — collison, 9:05 PM (0/0)
We need more Page Howes — Mr. Mac, 8:29 AM (0/0)
a Great Idea ! — starrider, 1:38 AM (0/0)
Save our Kids! — amiller, Sat 11:32 PM (0/0)
Remember the real issues too! — nicholasmoraitis, Sat 3:14 PM (0/0)
Good Idea!! — John Clyde, Sat 4:00 AM (0/0)
Thanks .KIDS Domains, Inc. — blueskies35, Sat 3:54 AM (0/0)
Preventative Medicine — Tri-State Kids, Sat 2:41 AM (0/0)
.KIDS Domains is right on target... — hms80, Sat 2:40 AM (0/0)
support.kids — Fancy, Fri 11:55 PM (0/0)
Oversight is good for students — Chaddilac Man, Fri 11:48 PM (0/0)
Support.KIDS — Bandit, Fri 10:29 PM (0/0)
KIDS Domains, Inc. — phb, Fri 9:46 PM (0/0)
support for KDI — rwhoward, Fri 9:27 PM (0/0)
OUR CHILDREN NEED A SAFE GREENSPACE — yosemitesierra, Fri 6:28 PM (0/0)
Nonconfrontational tool for parents to exercise discretion of child's use — mystwoman, Fri 1:45 PM (0/0)
kids — wat, Fri 12:28 AM (1/1)

Freedom, Law, Choices and Education — Lindy Kathlyn, Fri 2:53 AM (0/0)

Our kids need this — ant, Thu 11:54 PM (0/0)
Support of .kids domain — tyty, Thu 11:13 PM (0/0)
Support of .kidds — bubbles, Thu 10:44 PM (0/0)
Support of .kidds domainI — Kiam, Thu 10:04 PM (0/0)
.kids by .Kids Domains, Inc is the BEST! — Cindy, Thu 9:18 PM (0/0)
.KIDS DOMAINS, INC. — JoAnne , Thu 9:05 PM (0/0)
Finally! I hope it works! — sherig, Thu 9:03 PM (0/0)
comment — mo5360, Thu 8:52 PM (0/0)
Fully support concept — lc, Thu 8:38 PM (0/0)
This plan is ready to work. — readersvp, Thu 8:28 PM (0/0)
Why .kids is a GREAT idea! — PATKATMC, Thu 8:06 PM (0/0)
IT'S NOT ABOUT RESTRICTION, IT'S ABOUT FREEDOM! — kirkjayne, Thu 5:05 AM (1/1)

You Go Mr. Howe — Denise Warner, Thu 3:58 PM (0/0)

KDI's proposal — Barbara, October 28 @ 4:30 PM (1/1)

If it doesn't work for someone, send them to .letyourkidsseewhatever — Denise Warner, Thu 4:04 PM (0/0)

Excellent proposal — Neo, October 27 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
.kids tld - general observations — john.carr, October 27 @ 9:05 AM (1/2)

Yes, more consultation please! — nicholasmoraitis, October 28 @ 10:50 AM (1/1)

Excellent Point — pagehowe, Thu 2:34 PM (0/0)

An Outstanding Idea — e.t.m., October 26 @ 4:31 AM (0/0)
It's about kids, and it's about time! — rgiusta, October 24 @ 5:52 PM (1/1)

We agree — Lindy Kathlyn, Fri 3:02 AM (0/0)

KidSurf Online supports this Application — kidsurf, October 23 @ 11:44 PM (1/2)

Shouldn't .kids be an international domain? — brahim_m, October 29 @ 3:02 PM (1/1)

The International aspects of our proposal — pagehowe, Thu 2:43 PM (0/0)

Let's see how serious ICANN is about online safety for kids... — MarkF, October 23 @ 7:22 PM (1/1)

Here here!:) — kcbealo, Thu 5:19 PM (0/0)

support for .kids domain — napa, October 21 @ 7:32 PM (0/0)
we Need It — bigdaddy, October 20 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)
This is the way to go... — gmmiller, October 18 @ 6:20 PM (1/1)

all for it! — proudmom, October 20 @ 4:24 AM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:16 PM (2/2)

Howe's .Kids organization is ready to be fully implemented NOW — mystwoman, Fri 2:36 PM (0/0)
Get pistof at something else! — Denise Warner, Thu 4:11 PM (0/0)

Congratulations! — DRM, October 18 @ 5:32 AM (1/1)

Nonconfrontational tool for parents to exercise discretion of child's use — mystwoman, Tue 11:20 PM (0/0)

No Way Mr. Howe — momof2, October 16 @ 6:31 PM (2/2)

Yes Please Mr. Howe — Tri-State Kids, Thu 3:36 PM (0/0)
reply From Chairman — pagehowe, October 22 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)

Nice Seperation — slassre, October 16 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)
.Kids Domains proposal and a general comment on the .Kids TLD's — hedeer, October 16 @ 1:07 AM (2/2)

ICM Registry INc. .kids agrees with you — Bob-Ottawa, October 16 @ 7:54 PM (0/0)
Dont Give Up — pagehowe, October 16 @ 6:40 AM (0/0)

.KIDS TLD Application Should Be Denied - details inside... — ron10000, October 14 @ 5:25 PM (3/3)

.kids limits only the world of voluntary users, that's the beauty of it! — mystwoman, Fri 2:48 PM (0/0)
Uh, Ron 10000 you're partly right which is why we need Mr. Howe's proposal — Tri-State Kids, Thu 3:47 PM (0/0)
.KIDS TDL should be approved — jmweston, October 18 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)

Where are the kids in ".kids?" — nicholasmoraitis, October 14 @ 11:52 AM (3/6)

KIDS SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN .KIDS — lrfarny, October 24 @ 3:42 AM (0/0)
FYI — hedeer, October 17 @ 1:27 PM (1/1)

thanks! — nicholasmoraitis, October 24 @ 1:29 PM (0/0)

kids in KDI's .kids — pagehowe, October 14 @ 1:26 PM (1/2)

further points — nicholasmoraitis, October 15 @ 1:05 AM (1/1)

Thank You — pagehowe, October 16 @ 6:37 AM (0/0)

.law Application by dotlaw, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:17 PM (166/190)

Dot Law is a great idea — GrassHMC, 5 minutes ago (0/0)
Good Concept — spw, 11:42 PM (0/0)
.law great idea — bmw, 11:27 PM (0/0)
.law application by dotlaw, Inc. — SoCalLawyer, 10:44 PM (0/0)
I vote YES for .law !! — DK, 10:36 PM (0/0)
The Moldovan Connection — rarmstrong, 10:19 PM (0/0)
DotLaw - An Idea That Will Evolve Over Time — gerdan, 8:48 PM (0/0)
.law application — tbing1, 8:45 PM (0/0)
good idea — patk, 8:25 PM (0/0)
Great Idea!! — Law Dude, 6:07 PM (0/0)
Pro .law — electrolex, 5:49 PM (0/0)
makes sense — hgmobile, 5:27 PM (0/0)
Much Needed! — rigtyme, 5:06 PM (0/0)
Wonderful idea — golaw, 4:45 PM (0/0)
Marvellous — swiv, 1:44 PM (0/0)
The DotLaw Managed Domain Solution Just Makes Sense! — Larry Rossomondo, 12:02 AM (0/0)
dotlaw is good idea — lawstudent, 5:50 AM (0/0)
Dotlaw Solution for Information Overload — Tamie Leckemby, 1:55 AM (0/0)
Great Idea — jolly, 1:39 AM (0/0)
Dot-law a very good idea! — thalernd, Sat 11:39 PM (0/0)
support for dot-law — johnsonbx, Sat 10:02 PM (0/0)
DotLaw for Law Schools — saama, Sat 9:36 PM (0/0)
Support for DotLaw — charriman, Sat 9:17 PM (0/0)
Support — allen@pwc, Sat 8:19 PM (0/0)
comments — joematerazo, Sat 7:26 PM (0/0)
.law — g_davis, Sat 6:25 PM (0/0)
dotlaw promotes the public welfare — LloydRandolph, Sat 4:27 PM (0/0)
Comments of John F. McClatchey — John F. McClatchey, Sat 4:27 PM (1/1)

Welcomed Further Input From The Legal Profession! — dotLawInc, 6:34 PM (0/0)

Comment — Mark J. Pandiscio, Sat 4:20 PM (0/0)
DotLaw Helps International Legal Community — Heli Rostami, Sat 1:21 PM (0/0)
Dot.Law — Jemmil, Sat 6:00 AM (0/0)
dotlaw — sbhans, Sat 2:02 AM (0/0)
well done! — adavis1990, Sat 12:10 AM (0/0)
merits of dotlaw — Ruth, Fri 11:56 PM (1/1)

Good law — Ruth, Fri 11:57 PM (0/0)

.law — JAKauerauf, Fri 11:28 PM (0/0)
Support for .law proposal — bmcarson, Fri 11:14 PM (0/0)
tld.law — Hilton, Fri 10:58 PM (0/0)
dotlaw — pkalb, Fri 10:16 PM (0/0)
in favor of .law domain — tfb212, Fri 9:35 PM (0/0)
domain — Alexlaw, Fri 9:32 PM (0/0)
in favor of .law domain — lawyer212, Fri 9:29 PM (0/0)
.law — wjk, Fri 9:26 PM (0/0)
.law — Bert Foer, Fri 9:25 PM (0/0)
support — ptc, Fri 9:24 PM (0/0)
dotLaw — NPC122, Fri 9:21 PM (0/0)
dot-law — hgwinnell, Fri 9:18 PM (0/0)
Support for Dot.law — Bradleymcc, Fri 9:14 PM (0/0)
.law domain — lgibbes, Fri 9:05 PM (0/0)
The "dotLaw" Registration — MFrank, Fri 8:38 PM (0/0)
.lawdomain — hhooper, Fri 8:22 PM (0/0)
.law — mandy, Fri 8:19 PM (0/0)
.law — kiersten, Fri 8:01 PM (0/0)
.law — MikeC, Fri 7:53 PM (0/0)
Comment on .Law — lil, Fri 7:49 PM (0/0)
.law e-mail initiative — grandpooba, Fri 7:24 PM (0/0)
We need this. — roemer, Fri 7:22 PM (0/0)
DotLaw, Inc. — dallasJR3, Fri 6:53 PM (0/0)
Real useful idea — bison, Fri 6:52 PM (0/0)
.law — marksamuels, Fri 6:51 PM (0/0)
.Law Domain — MGardberg, Fri 5:56 PM (0/0)
good idea — jhkinrich, Fri 5:46 PM (0/0)
.law — B.Taylor, Fri 5:43 PM (0/0)
.law = user friendly internet — katempp98, Fri 5:35 PM (0/0)
dot law important idea — donneri, Fri 5:33 PM (0/0)
comments — sfriedman, Fri 5:28 PM (0/0)
Simple, Easier Web Navigation — mvmiller, Fri 5:04 PM (0/0)
Support for .law — h.art.jonasson, Fri 4:52 PM (0/0)
.law — NDW, Fri 4:43 PM (0/0)
dotLaw — estradal, Fri 4:38 PM (0/0)
dotlawdomain — RFS, Fri 4:35 PM (0/0)
Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP — dhooker, Fri 4:04 PM (3/3)

Re: Comments of Thompson Hine & Flory LLP — dotLawInc, 6:28 PM (0/0)
Reservations Regarding Application — rasatter, 1:24 PM (0/0)
Do you know how the current system works? — software_engineer, Sat 7:22 PM (0/0)

application of dotLaw — christine, Fri 3:44 PM (0/0)
Smart Start — StarDream, Fri 3:43 PM (0/0)
.law — Amy, Fri 3:27 PM (0/0)
comment.law — Lori J. McGuire, Fri 3:11 PM (0/0)
good concept — steven16, Fri 3:08 PM (0/0)
dotlaw — Lobbyist, Fri 2:58 PM (0/0)
dotlaw — szlezinger, Fri 2:57 PM (0/0)
dotlaw — drosenberg, Fri 2:56 PM (0/0)
.law — zimmermc, Fri 2:52 PM (1/1)

dotlaw is a great idea — karenyen, Fri 3:50 PM (0/0)

Support for .law — bfwebster, Fri 2:48 PM (0/0)
the law domain — paria, Fri 2:28 PM (0/0)
DOTLAW — dudey, Fri 2:02 PM (1/1)

DotLaw Application — wcmeili, Sat 6:54 PM (0/0)

.law is a great idea — daimonic, Fri 8:16 AM (0/0)
dotLaw = a much needed service — rargyle, Fri 12:17 AM (0/0)
.law domain — Coralie Matayoshi, Thu 11:15 PM (0/0)
.law — Reggie, Thu 10:12 PM (0/0)
good idea — leevogel, Thu 10:07 PM (0/0)
dotlaw — unclebill, Thu 9:57 PM (0/0)
dotlaw — furlong, Thu 9:37 PM (0/0)
.law — mbr, Thu 9:31 PM (0/0)
.law e-mail initiative — trepped, Thu 9:02 PM (0/0)
.law - The internet will actually make sense and be easy to use? — JPA, Thu 9:00 PM (0/0)
domain — lawrence, Thu 8:02 PM (0/0)
.law domain — corytodd, Thu 8:02 PM (0/0)
In Support of DotLaw — iow4f, Thu 7:43 PM (0/0)
Useful tool — swter, Thu 7:11 PM (0/0)
.law — mmcburney, Thu 6:37 PM (0/0)
Dot Law Application — jimzangaro, Thu 6:15 PM (1/1)

RE: Dot Law Application — dotLawInc, 6:45 PM (0/0)

.law — cumbow, Thu 6:00 PM (0/0)
Needed help — grezl, Thu 5:53 PM (0/0)
.law — riker, Thu 5:50 PM (0/0)
.law — yeats, Thu 5:07 PM (0/0)
dotLaw ICANN application — mfnlaw, Thu 4:57 PM (0/0)
Comments on website — CindiE, Thu 4:54 PM (0/0)
comments on dotlaw proposal — wmakena, Thu 4:51 PM (1/1)

Extensions of DotLaw — dotLawInc, 6:50 PM (0/0)

dotLaw proposal — techentin, Thu 4:35 PM (0/0)
lawdomain — jpditty, Thu 4:29 PM (0/0)
.law — mtobiason, Thu 4:29 PM (0/0)
A useful proposal — MaryCheryl, Thu 4:03 PM (0/0)
.law domain — cholise, Thu 3:47 PM (0/0)
Feedback on .law — Deb, Thu 3:43 PM (1/1)

Further Clarifications About DotLaw, Inc — dotLawInc, 6:53 PM (0/0)

dotLaw — rsmyers, Thu 2:36 PM (0/0)
Dispute resolution — Morrissey, Thu 2:24 PM (1/1)

Re: Dispute resolution — dotLawInc, 7:02 PM (0/0)

support for the .law concept — dakin-grimm, Thu 3:53 AM (0/0)
.law — MELISSA, Thu 2:34 AM (0/0)
Dotlaw — jeremyleon, Thu 12:55 AM (0/0)
Dot.Law — FamLaw, Thu 12:37 AM (0/0)
dotlaw — scrane, Wed 11:16 PM (0/0)
dotlaw — ddunham, Wed 11:06 PM (0/0)
dotLaw — Amy McCurdy, Wed 10:04 PM (0/0)
A Great Idea — mrscott, Wed 9:32 PM (0/0)
comments — aj, Wed 9:16 PM (0/0)
Comment — vanhuysen, Wed 8:28 PM (0/0)
dotlaw application — tommyg2230, Wed 8:22 PM (0/0)
Comment — vap613, Wed 8:18 PM (0/0)
Great Idea — MDVACH, Wed 7:37 PM (0/0)
.law domain — david quinto, Wed 5:49 PM (0/0)
.law URL — rhenneke, Wed 5:04 PM (0/0)
Message — jmaz91578, Wed 4:46 PM (0/0)
Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — allbrandtr, Wed 5:45 AM (1/1)

Re: Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — dotLawInc, Wed 6:02 PM (0/0)

International View — Gavin, Wed 2:36 AM (0/0)
.law is a great idea — audi3, Wed 1:50 AM (0/0)
Great IDEA!!! — ninaesq, Wed 1:07 AM (0/0)
Vote for dotLaw — Markroth, Tue 11:14 PM (0/0)
Vote for DotLaw — linden, Tue 10:12 PM (0/0)
Comment — Jim1, Tue 10:12 PM (0/0)
Very Helpful — kevinfl, Tue 9:41 PM (0/0)
.law domain — gm1, Tue 9:34 PM (0/0)
dotLaw TLD — Segman, Tue 8:23 PM (0/0)
Reaction — aterry, Tue 7:51 PM (0/0)
dotLaw — nmcs, Tue 7:14 PM (0/0)
comment — mungar, Tue 5:09 PM (0/0)
Great idea — jpirone, Tue 5:08 PM (0/0)
.law is a good idea — inhousec, Tue 4:35 PM (0/0)
good idea — madlin, Tue 3:53 PM (0/0)
Check out "www.thelawdomain.net" — yasmine saadat, Tue 11:01 AM (0/0)
Yes to DotLaw — ssinger, Tue 4:42 AM (0/0)
Strong support for .law — comanche, Tue 4:06 AM (0/0)
Definite YES for dotLaw — krasmussen, Tue 4:00 AM (0/0)
Enthusiastic support for dotLaw — Vig Mangasarian, Tue 3:45 AM (0/0)
dotLaw domain name — rcb, Mon 10:24 PM (0/0)
.law domain — rm1, Mon 10:22 PM (0/0)
.law — RM1, Mon 10:08 PM (0/0)
.LAW — DFG1, Mon 9:15 PM (0/0)
lawdomain.net — Hollywood , Mon 7:22 PM (0/0)
Domain .law is a Great Idea! — jake, Mon 7:13 PM (0/0)
dotlaw, inc. a welcome site! — fthompson, Mon 3:19 PM (0/0)
Yes to .law, brilliant idea — Soussan Saadat, Mon 2:42 PM (0/0)
proposal feedback — mrb, Mon 4:14 AM (0/0)
REJECT DotLaw, Inc.'s Proposal — retronics1, October 28 @ 6:39 AM (1/5)

The Realities of Regulation — dotLawInc, Mon 3:44 AM (2/4)

Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — allbrandtr, Wed 5:43 AM (1/1)

RE: Dotlaw, Inc. Questionable Abilities — dotLawInc, Wed 6:06 PM (0/0)

NO to .law — PHXbird, Mon 10:41 PM (1/1)

Organized & Useful dotLaw — EddieO, Wed 4:57 AM (0/0)

Needs of Law Schools and Legal Academia ignored — Ferziger, October 26 @ 7:10 PM (1/1)

RE: Needs of Law Schools and Legal Academia ignored — dotLawInc, Tue 3:10 PM (0/0)

Application of dot law — Makary Esq, October 26 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
dotlaw, Inc.'s Application Is Not in the Public Interest — anupamchander, October 24 @ 8:56 PM (2/3)

good concept — Ankim, Fri 6:45 AM (1/1)

.law — Susie, Fri 8:32 PM (0/0)

Clarifications for a Concerned Reviewer — dotLawInc, October 26 @ 3:42 AM (0/0)

Proposal — lbrook51, October 22 @ 5:52 AM (2/2)

comments on the proposal — manch, Wed 6:14 PM (0/0)
Your request for more information — The Founders, Mon 4:07 AM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:18 PM (1/1)

.law — R Deming, Fri 8:58 PM (0/0)

.mall, etc. Application by Commercial Connect, LLC — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:16 PM (12/23)

Questionable ties? — lapointe, 10:42 PM (0/0)
ICANN Bribery? — jtrade, 3:58 AM (0/0)
MALL extension has big future for ecommerce — jburkhart, Thu 6:59 PM (0/0)
I Agree, Great Choice! — Talmage, Mon 8:05 PM (0/0)
Great Service - Great People — Sandra, October 27 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)
Application Review -- Many concerns here ! — TLD Facts, October 26 @ 7:05 PM (1/1)

Who ARE You? — DaveBusiness, October 27 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)

Pre-registration with CASDNS — xaero, October 24 @ 6:41 PM (1/1)

Comment on companies vying for the .shop gtld — zgyeo, 3:03 AM (0/0)

.Shop may be good - ICANN should be cautious with its review — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 3:50 AM (1/1)

Being Reasonable — DanielK, October 23 @ 2:38 PM (0/0)

B A D as in NOT GOOD — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:19 PM (1/1)

Wrong Reading — DanielK, October 23 @ 2:53 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)
The Best of the Bunch — ChrisT, October 17 @ 2:53 PM (0/0)
Great Idea — DaveBusiness, October 16 @ 4:09 AM (1/7)

Comment on why .shop is not good to issue — emc2, October 17 @ 3:47 AM (2/6)

A Vested Interest — Sarah, October 17 @ 2:20 PM (0/0)
You Are Missing The Point — DaveBusiness, October 17 @ 2:10 PM (1/4)

Read Afilias press release: 55% will re-register a generic domain — emc2, October 18 @ 3:53 AM (1/3)

Maybe We Read This Differently — DaveBusiness, October 18 @ 5:50 PM (1/2)

Flaw in your argument, domain names are brands — emc2, October 19 @ 3:07 PM (1/1)

Commercial Connects Proposal Looks Like A Risky Venture To Me — aaaswt, Fri 6:39 AM (0/0)

.mas, etc. Application by Nokia Corporation — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:15 PM (8/10)

BROAD support for a mobile TLD — Mikey, Thu 5:58 PM (0/0)
GSM Association supports .mobile Top Level Domain application — poflaherty, Thu 4:52 PM (1/1)

Granting a TLD to one device manufacturer would be a mistake — sking, 10:41 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)
Sonera awarded for good customer service as ISP — Reidar, October 17 @ 8:57 AM (0/0)
not quite finished, which raises an interesting question... — kent, October 14 @ 6:28 PM (1/1)

Hopefully development is allowed — Hz, Thu 5:28 PM (0/0)

.mobile — BrianC, October 14 @ 7:19 AM (0/0)
Summary at www.nokia.com/press/ntld.html — Reidar, October 14 @ 1:34 AM (0/0)
maybe.something.here.now — tim, October 14 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)

.mus, etc. Application by Museum Domain Management Association — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:12 PM (28/48)

Support for .museum from Resource - the UK Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries — DavidDawson, 11:10 PM (0/0)
International resolution in support of a museum TLD — Cary Karp, 10:22 PM (0/0)
Support for .museum from Dallas Museum of Art — jlane, Fri 6:38 PM (0/0)
support for. museum — mmohammed, Fri 5:21 PM (0/0)
Strong Support for .Museum — American Association of Museums, Thu 10:56 PM (0/0)
Support for .museum — Museum Trustee Association, Thu 8:42 PM (0/0)
.museum — chief of staff, Thu 3:55 PM (0/0)
support for .museum — rshelly, Tue 3:46 PM (0/0)
Support for .museum — SQuigley, Tue 1:06 AM (0/0)
yes to .museum — mhaines, Mon 5:29 PM (0/0)
Support for .museum - SAMA South Africa — glyn@nfi.org.za, Mon 5:18 PM (0/0)
Support for .museum — CMoR, October 29 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
Support for .museum — akeshet, October 29 @ 7:20 AM (1/1)

support for .museum — guggenheim-bilbao, Thu 8:00 AM (0/0)

Support for ".MUSEUM" — tam, October 27 @ 2:51 PM (1/1)

Support for restricted .museum — agoldblatt, October 27 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)

SUPPORT FOR DOT-MUSEUM TL DOMAIN — WWitschey, October 27 @ 2:29 PM (0/0)
support for .museum — Litchfield History Museum, October 27 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
support for .mus — Thammond, October 27 @ 2:08 PM (0/0)
support for .museum — Shiraz, October 27 @ 8:52 AM (0/0)
Affirmative for .MUSEUM or .MUSE — JadranK, October 27 @ 8:50 AM (0/0)
Support for .museum — MelissaR, October 26 @ 10:20 PM (1/1)

.mus go for it! — friso, October 27 @ 7:03 AM (0/0)

dot-museum — GCASAL, October 26 @ 7:04 AM (0/0)
Forwarded commentary about the museum domain proposal — Support Notification, October 26 @ 6:07 AM (12/12)

Support from the Children's Museum of Indianapolis — Support Notification, Sat 11:16 AM (0/0)
Support from Nebraska State Historical Society — Support Notification, Sat 11:12 AM (0/0)
Support from Alaska's State Museum Association — Support Notification, Sat 11:09 AM (0/0)
Support from Virtual Museum of Arts El Pais Uruguay — Support Notification, Sat 11:04 AM (0/0)
Support from Edmonton Telephone Historical Centre — Support Notification, Mon 8:36 PM (0/0)
Support from Western Reserve — Support Notification, October 27 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)
We strongly support dot museum for TLD: A small word but a big step for mankind — Support Notification, October 27 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
Support from Ulster Museum — Support Notification, October 27 @ 3:24 PM (0/0)
Support from Wereldsmuseum — Support Notification, October 27 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)
.MUS — alix, October 27 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
Support from SAAG — Support Notification, October 26 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)
Support from VPHSCM — Support Notification, October 26 @ 8:36 PM (0/0)

For dot.museum to be reliable it should refer to a real museum — Steven Engelsman, October 23 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)
Support for .museum — Cary Karp, October 20 @ 8:35 AM (1/1)

support .museum — plasticsman, October 21 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)
.mus, .museum, etc. — glyn, October 15 @ 3:45 AM (1/1)

Sickening — webboy, October 15 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)

Professional reaction to these domain registrations — Global Museum, October 14 @ 7:13 PM (1/1)

.museum TLD — MAA, Mon 4:14 PM (0/0)

Opposition to the use of the word MUSEA as a new TLD — msuckow, October 14 @ 2:33 AM (2/2)

Not MUSEA, but .museum — jwbean, Thu 5:13 AM (0/0)
Yes to .museum — davidf, October 26 @ 2:01 PM (0/0)

.name, etc. Application by The Global Name Registry, Limited — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:20 PM (9/11)

Fully funded, but delivery outsourced — griffiths, 8:18 PM (0/0)
Nightmare! — PHXbird, Fri 5:40 PM (0/0)
Handling multiple people with the same name — HH, Wed 3:54 PM (0/0)
How does the applicant propose handling multiple people with the same name? — Hunter, October 27 @ 4:21 AM (0/0)
Reject the .name application...concept close to cyberquatting — emc2, October 19 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)
Infringing ".name" sufix & potential legal action — emc2, October 18 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)
Global Name Registry application for .name, short summary — HH, October 18 @ 11:10 AM (1/1)

Infringing ".name" prior use trademark & potential legal action — emc2, October 18 @ 4:16 PM (0/0)

".name" infringes on our prior use trademark — emc2, October 17 @ 3:01 AM (1/1)

CLAIMS CONSIDERED UNFOUNDED — panzer, Fri 9:49 AM (0/0)

.nom Application by CORE Internet Council of Registrars — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:11 PM (15/49)

Support for the .NOM proposal from CORE — JMB, 7:06 PM (0/0)
Questionable financial & business capabilies — griffiths, 5:02 PM (0/0)
Exellent CORE application for .NOM — kasia, Sat 4:11 PM (0/0)
Few Positive Points in Regards to CORE Application — sharjeel, Fri 6:44 PM (0/0)
Question... — PHXbird, Fri 5:45 PM (0/0)
Support to CORE .nom proposal — RETEVISION, Thu 8:49 AM (0/0)
CORE application is good for the Internet — ksoussi, Thu 1:07 AM (1/1)

CORE is the best registry for .NOM — MFIC, Thu 10:30 PM (0/0)

How does the applicant propose handling multiple people with the same name? — hunter, October 27 @ 3:47 AM (1/4)

Re: does the applicant propose handling multiple people with the same name? — nike, October 27 @ 11:19 PM (1/3)

Nothing prevents the use of variants, nicknames, combinations or fancy names — WS, October 29 @ 10:28 PM (1/2)

Re: does the applicant propose handling multiple people with the same name? — hunter, Wed 6:16 AM (1/1)

Multiple people with the same name — Hunter, Sat 10:16 AM (0/0)

CORE should be required to accept due process in US — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 5:20 AM (1/1)

Welcome to the world... — huguesdb, October 27 @ 12:05 AM (0/0)

Why is CORE Hiding Its Financials? — Need2Know, October 20 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)
CORE's application for .NOM now online! — nike, October 19 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:23 PM (0/0)
CORE's proposal for .NOM — nike, October 17 @ 2:04 AM (0/0)
Why don't CORE stop Pre-registrations for .nom, from it's CO-Founder Knipp.de? — Rebeka, October 16 @ 6:24 PM (2/4)

pre-registrations != registrations — KMalorny, October 17 @ 8:02 PM (1/2)

Pre-Registrations or Registrations at CORE's knipp.de? — Rebeka, October 17 @ 8:41 PM (1/1)

P-R-E-Registrations — KMalorny, October 17 @ 10:38 PM (0/0)

Pre-registration — nike, October 17 @ 5:00 AM (0/0)

Is CORE Nonprofit or FOR Profit.....Please Respond..Someone from CORE....... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 4:01 AM (2/24)

CORE — nike, October 16 @ 2:43 AM (1/4)

Thanks for your comments...However they raise some serious questions CORE must answer!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 16 @ 3:47 AM (1/3)

NP's in Switzerland — huguesdb, October 16 @ 8:21 AM (1/2)

Quick Question — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 16 @ 11:57 PM (1/1)

NP's in Switzerland — huguesdb, October 18 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)

www.corenic.org — BrianC, October 15 @ 8:02 AM (1/18)

Thanks "BrianC" for proving my point........By the way what does "BrianC" stand for... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 4:46 PM (1/17)

The facts & "Creditability" — BrianC, October 15 @ 11:01 PM (1/16)

Sorry for the misspelling, but a NonProfit shouldn't be involved with Afilia---End of Discussion.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 16 @ 12:12 AM (1/15)

My assessment — BrianC, October 16 @ 12:23 AM (1/14)

I disagree, respectfully — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 16 @ 12:47 AM (1/13)

LLC = Limited Liability Company — BrianC, October 16 @ 1:27 AM (1/12)

O.K Now your being Belligerent and ineffective in backing your argument.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 16 @ 2:39 AM (1/11)

My last post — BrianC, October 16 @ 4:53 AM (1/10)

My Last Post.....I am not one to have the last word, but you make me refute your comments--easily — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 16 @ 5:17 AM (1/9)

CORE's membership in Afilias — jwatts, October 16 @ 7:10 PM (1/8)

CORE Can join Afilias....it's what they do with the money...does it back their NP mission — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 16 @ 11:46 PM (2/7)

CORE — nike, October 17 @ 2:01 AM (0/0)
i guess the stereotype of stupid country folk in south dakota is true — DotMorons, October 17 @ 1:31 AM (1/5)

O.k nice post...you got me...I declare a truce in respect for the Dot NOM Application.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 3:36 AM (1/4)

CORE's response — nike, October 17 @ 4:41 AM (1/3)

Sir, with all due respect...you said you were not from "CORE" — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 7:12 AM (2/2)

Official response — nike, October 17 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)
CORE — nike, October 17 @ 8:19 PM (0/0)

.nom Application by the dotNOM Consortium — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:11 PM (32/69)

End price — Hastings, 12:04 AM (1/8)

ENd Price — J.Green, 12:08 AM (1/7)

Thanks John — Hastings, 12:14 AM (1/6)

on the $3.50 — J.Green, 12:18 AM (1/5)

DNS servers — Hastings, 59 minutes ago (1/4)

don't know — J.Green, 56 minutes ago (1/3)

registrar function — Hastings, 48 minutes ago (1/2)

money on the table! — J.Green, 44 minutes ago (1/1)

projections — Hastings, 37 minutes ago (0/0)

Legal responcibility? — Ted Hanks, 10:57 PM (0/0)
global focus — Fred Crampe, 10:53 PM (0/0)
Unclear financial costs and structure — griffiths, 9:56 PM (2/2)

to griffiths — Fred Crampe, 10:14 PM (0/0)
costs — Ted Hanks, 10:06 PM (0/0)

separation of commercial and pesonal domains — Ted Hanks, 9:13 PM (1/2)

separation of communication & commerce — Fred Crampe, 9:29 PM (1/1)

Fred-in reply to your last post — Ted Hanks, 9:59 PM (0/0)

Accounting discrepancies — hunter, 4:09 AM (1/1)

you're outdoing youself! — Fred Crampe, 9:48 PM (0/0)

Clarification of financial information — Hunter, Sat 9:55 AM (0/0)
Multiple people with the same name — Hunter, Sat 9:46 AM (1/1)

some smart solution! — Fred Crampe, 9:44 PM (0/0)

.NOM sounds too much like .COM — julie, Sat 4:14 AM (1/3)

RE: .NOM sounds too much like .COM — faure, 12:38 AM (1/2)

confusion over the .nom — Ted Hanks, 9:36 PM (1/1)

to Ted Hanks — Fred Crampe, 9:51 PM (0/0)

tech view of .nom — techchick, Sat 2:54 AM (0/0)
.nom- CORE or dotnom consortium? — Ted Hanks, Sat 2:46 AM (0/0)
dotNOM Consortium — Walter Bergfeld, Sat 12:29 AM (0/0)
.nom — alireza, Fri 9:04 PM (1/1)

disclosure — Ted Hanks, Sat 2:23 AM (0/0)

.NOM can be great — alireza, Fri 8:57 PM (0/0)
Same problem... — PHXbird, Fri 5:50 PM (1/2)

to PHXbird — phil browning, Fri 7:07 PM (1/1)

Exactly my point! — PHXbird, Sat 5:55 PM (0/0)

.nom — jedrink24, Fri 5:34 PM (1/2)

auctions the way to go — fredHanks, Sat 2:11 AM (1/1)

no auctions please — Fred Crampe, 10:30 PM (0/0)

I agree with Jim Chen on .nom — BionicBro, Fri 2:45 AM (0/0)
dot whatever — PinkFish, Fri 2:20 AM (1/3)

easy, tex — bldigrn, Fri 3:06 AM (2/2)

warm hearts etc — J.Green, 42 minutes ago (0/0)
conflict of interest? — fredHanks, Sat 2:15 AM (0/0)

demand for .nom — Jim Chen, Thu 8:53 PM (0/0)
.NOM makes great sense — DRrandy, Thu 5:56 AM (0/0)
dotNOM — Jer072, Thu 2:33 AM (1/1)

.nom? — SamSingh, Thu 8:39 PM (0/0)

.nom proposal is an excellent idea — tiger74, Thu 1:56 AM (0/0)
.nom consortium — wayanna, Thu 1:47 AM (0/0)
.nom consortium — lindaw, Thu 1:01 AM (0/0)
wholesale price — UV, Mon 5:50 PM (2/8)

but does the internet user care? — Ted Hanks, Sat 2:27 AM (0/0)
The internet should be a utility — mayor, Wed 6:02 AM (2/6)

sweet spot for .nom price — Jim Chen, Thu 8:56 PM (1/1)

but how? — phil browning, Thu 10:16 PM (0/0)

.nom- a promising proposal (Reply to Mayor's post) — Phil Browning, Wed 11:48 PM (1/3)

like the dotNOM application — Matt Simons, Thu 12:12 AM (1/2)

reply to Matt — Carla, Thu 1:57 AM (1/1)

.nom applications — Skull, Thu 2:13 AM (0/0)

Excellent Proposal — cbuck@usc.edu, October 27 @ 7:04 PM (0/0)
Confusion about .TV’s finances — Hunter, October 27 @ 4:18 AM (0/0)
How does the applicant propose handling multiple people with the same name? — hunter, October 27 @ 3:42 AM (1/1)

Any ideas? — Hastings, 28 minutes ago (0/0)

.nom vs .com/.net for individuals — stvtron, October 26 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)
.nom proposal looks good — dc, October 26 @ 11:39 PM (1/2)

registry price — Phil Browning, Thu 6:48 PM (1/1)

$3.50 cost vs. NSI's $6 — bldigrn, Thu 7:19 PM (0/0)

.nom, .pro — nschlegel, October 25 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:25 PM (0/0)

.one Application by Group One Registry, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:09 PM (29/34)

Is dot One really needed? — sking, 9:55 PM (1/1)

This TLD is needed — PaulS, 12:16 AM (0/0)

Support for .one — FranR, 3:29 AM (1/1)

Great for Embedded Systems — doodledan, 7:20 AM (0/0)

Group One Registry SHOULD be supported — mouradz, Fri 7:29 PM (0/0)
me too! — mika, Fri 6:48 PM (0/0)
.one — strickt, Fri 5:52 AM (0/0)
Good Proposal — catief, Fri 5:30 AM (0/0)
Support for .one - simple and beneficial — rguptill, Fri 12:38 AM (0/0)
I support .one — jwilson, Thu 6:43 PM (0/0)
Support for (.one) — KD, Thu 2:07 AM (0/0)
Aesbus supports.one — jenjen281, Wed 8:09 PM (0/0)
Support for .one — bakedon, Wed 7:26 PM (0/0)
The Internet needs .one! — Havener, Wed 3:05 AM (0/0)
Support for Group One registry (.one) — jonsholberg, Wed 1:04 AM (0/0)
.one — cumbow, Tue 10:46 PM (0/0)
.one TLD is a very sound proposal — smuller, Tue 7:28 PM (0/0)
Correlation between .one address and phone numbers — msedmundw, Mon 11:46 PM (1/1)

Phone Number Applications — NetNumber, Wed 9:24 PM (0/0)

Public safety and .one — sellmhi, Mon 7:25 PM (0/0)
Visual Computing Systems supports .one — roykess, October 29 @ 5:12 AM (0/0)
Shockwave Wireless Support for Group One's Registry Proposal — thirou, October 28 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
.One domain. — Amin_Ansari, October 27 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
Go with group one Registry Inc's Proposal — hubbard4536, October 27 @ 7:50 AM (0/0)
Support for Group One Registry — Garrettsmith, October 27 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)
The .one TLD — lbayles, October 27 @ 2:54 AM (1/1)

TLD - What an excellent idea — MrYe, Fri 2:25 AM (0/0)

.one — rajamedlink, October 26 @ 6:40 PM (0/0)
Fort Knox / WebVision Relationship — cdodder, October 24 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)
jGuru supports .one — tombu, October 23 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)
.one application by Group One Registry — ggoeser, October 22 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
Application posted at www.grouponeregistry.com — PKS, October 17 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)

Good and exciting proposal — Tariq , October 26 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)

.per Application by JVTeam, LLC — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:09 PM (5/7)

Charges from suppliers seem to be abnormally high — griffiths, 7:48 PM (0/0)
Serious question... — PHXbird, Fri 5:58 PM (0/0)
.per seems the most ready for the personal web explosion! — tjhession, Thu 9:19 AM (0/0)
I support the .per application — sarah21, Mon 2:35 PM (2/2)

why not stick with the strong .NOM — DRrandy, Thu 6:16 AM (0/0)
How to handle multiple "sarah"s? — PHXbird, Tue 2:51 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)

.pid Application by DADA Spa — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:08 PM (13/22)

Good idea — willy, 11:18 PM (0/0)
Questionable financial capabilities — griffiths, 4:53 PM (0/0)
an interesting idea — ocraml, 1:40 AM (0/0)
Many people with the same name — hunter, Sat 1:13 PM (1/1)

Many people with the same name — lombardp, Sat 3:01 PM (0/0)

Never heard/seen a more stupid idea — Lou, Thu 10:36 PM (2/2)

Agree with Lou... — PHXbird, Fri 6:04 PM (0/0)
Never heard/seen a more stupid idea — lombardp, Thu 10:55 PM (0/0)

innovation idea — dargento, Wed 1:38 PM (0/0)
let's get free — corbetta, October 26 @ 8:31 AM (0/0)
too many ........ — Perito Gaudi, October 25 @ 1:27 PM (0/0)
Problem to be solved — jweb, October 20 @ 12:25 AM (1/2)

Not very well-thought — sw, October 24 @ 7:45 AM (1/1)

Further explanation — sk, October 25 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)
a PID for both physical and digital space — Marco Brizzi, October 18 @ 2:59 PM (0/0)
.pid, a real World-on-Web application — TheWizard, October 17 @ 11:41 AM (0/0)
More Info — silvia, October 14 @ 8:38 AM (4/4)

Hmmm... — Mikey, Thu 5:48 PM (0/0)
the one and only john smith — haknam, Thu 1:12 PM (0/0)
good greatest evolution — T-jean, October 28 @ 2:01 PM (0/0)
Interesting concept — BrianC, October 15 @ 1:25 AM (0/0)

.post Application by the Universal Postal Union — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:08 PM (2/2)

.POST — violetlight, October 27 @ 3:39 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)

.pro Application by the dotPRO Consortium — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:07 PM (12/60)

tech view of .nom — techchick, Sat 2:56 AM (0/0)
dotPRO Consortium — Walter Bergfeld, Sat 12:31 AM (1/1)

reply to walter — fredHanks, Sat 2:03 AM (0/0)

.pro! — jedrink24, Fri 5:39 PM (2/5)

price discrimination — fredHanks, Sat 2:06 AM (0/0)
Ability to pay? — PHXbird, Fri 6:16 PM (1/3)

"acceptance" — tomam, Fri 6:40 PM (1/2)

Reply — PHXbird, Fri 6:58 PM (1/1)

number of professionals on the net — tomam, Fri 7:18 PM (0/0)

ICANN, please, approving dotPRO is a NO-BRAINER — TLDdaddy, Fri 2:05 AM (1/1)

:^D — bldigrn, Fri 2:59 AM (0/0)

I vote for dotPro — BionicBro, Fri 1:49 AM (0/0)
Organization or Chaos? — Jennifer Sun, Fri 1:43 AM (3/3)

to jennifer (not impressed?) — Hastings, 22 minutes ago (0/0)
cross matching dotTV with other applicants — fred hanks, 8:52 PM (0/0)
partial agreement — PinkFish, Fri 2:54 AM (0/0)

.Pro! — Jer072, Thu 2:43 AM (1/2)

reply to .pro! — Matt Simons, Thu 3:49 AM (1/1)

to Matt Simmons — Jim Chen, Thu 9:01 PM (0/0)

DotPro Consortium — tiger74, Thu 2:08 AM (1/14)

time frame? — Skull, Thu 2:19 AM (2/13)

dotpro application — SamSingh, Thu 7:49 PM (2/11)

One thought on .pro — gt515, Fri 12:48 AM (0/0)
reply to Sam — Matt Simons, Thu 7:56 PM (1/9)

to Matt — SamSingh, Thu 7:58 PM (1/8)

Lycos — Matt Simons, Thu 8:03 PM (1/7)

mgmt team — SamSingh, Thu 8:04 PM (1/6)

reply to mgmt team — Matt Simons, Thu 8:09 PM (1/5)

still on mgmt team — SamSingh, Thu 8:10 PM (1/4)

more on management team — bldigrn, Thu 8:19 PM (1/3)

reply to bldigrn — SamSingh, Thu 8:35 PM (1/2)

management matters — tomam, Thu 8:39 PM (1/1)

reply-mgmt matters — Jim Chen, Thu 8:59 PM (0/0)

reply to time frame — Matt Simons, Thu 3:51 AM (0/0)

The internet should be a utility — mayor, Wed 6:07 AM (0/0)
I beg to differ — spamela, October 27 @ 12:45 AM (1/20)

REPLY to SPAMELA RE: Hoarding By .TV — julie, October 28 @ 9:54 AM (2/19)

reply to Julie — Bob Singer, Mon 6:27 PM (1/15)

Back to you, Bob... — julie, Tue 11:28 AM (3/14)

reply to Julie — Matt Simons, Thu 3:44 AM (0/0)
When — Matt Simons, Thu 12:17 AM (0/0)
Reply to Julie — Phil Browning, Thu 12:00 AM (2/11)

Reply to Phil re: $14.33 Avg .TV Domain Price? — julie, Thu 4:06 PM (4/8)

ha! — fredHanks, Sat 2:08 AM (0/0)
Julie- please do some homework — bldigrn, Thu 6:52 PM (1/2)

Homework — julie, 6:36 AM (1/1)

mgmt stake — fred hanks, 8:46 PM (0/0)

? — phil Browning, Thu 6:31 PM (1/2)

Thankyou David — julie, Sat 8:07 AM (1/1)

Deferred Income — David Coombs, Sat 9:06 PM (0/0)

Accounting Lesson — David Coombs, Thu 6:24 PM (0/0)

to Phil — lindaw, Thu 1:04 AM (1/1)

reply to Linda — wayanna, Thu 1:50 AM (0/0)

please help me understand "hoarding" — bldigrn, Mon 5:59 PM (1/2)

Reply to Blondie — julie, Tue 12:39 AM (1/1)

reply to Julie — bldigrn, Tue 6:44 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)
Dot Pro CONsortium — Julie, October 15 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)

Hoarding — RoscoePico, Thu 1:26 AM (1/1)

vokacuca — Carla, Thu 2:07 AM (0/0)

.pro Application by RegistryPro, Ltd. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:07 PM (4/4)

Support for .pro TLD — mental health, Fri 9:25 PM (0/0)
expression of interest for RegistryPro Advisory Board — ebroitman, Tue 7:05 PM (0/0)
Response to Professor Chander regarding professional restricted TLDs — ebroitman, October 27 @ 4:00 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)

.tel Application by Pulver, Peek, and Marschel — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:06 PM (15/24)

Let's go forward — MSisson, 12:04 AM (0/0)
Pulver does not need .tel — hta, Sat 11:01 PM (1/1)

Competition needs ".tel" — NetNumber, 9:51 PM (0/0)

Support for Netnumber application — travelocity, Sat 5:08 PM (0/0)
ITU, IETF, ICANN, ENUM, "e164.arpa" and ".tel" — NetNumber, Sat 3:44 PM (1/1)

A view from the IETF ENUM WG — ITAB, Sat 5:32 PM (0/0)

Lucent Representative Nominated To ITAB Board — ITAB, Fri 7:24 PM (0/0)
After reading all three proposals — R.Jackson, Wed 10:56 PM (1/1)

Implementation Experience Counts — davidbk, Fri 8:48 PM (0/0)

.tel application — bboston, Tue 10:13 PM (0/0)
Power Of The ENUM Standard — perignon, Tue 9:07 PM (1/1)

Additional ENUM Thoughts — NetNumber, Wed 5:45 PM (0/0)

Support for ".tel" TLD — dischang, October 26 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
3Com Internet-Telephony Executive nominated to ITAB Board — ITAB, October 26 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
Competition At Risk — NetNumber, October 25 @ 5:38 PM (2/4)

Support for ".tel" TLD — garciar8, Mon 2:32 PM (0/0)
Printer friendly PDF version of "Competition At Risk" paper — NetNumber, October 25 @ 7:00 PM (2/2)

Comment from South Korea — JW Park, October 27 @ 8:08 PM (0/0)
PTT Control Is A Real Issue — Juergen, October 27 @ 8:56 AM (0/0)

Please take the opportunity to act -- not just talk — gkrucik, October 25 @ 3:02 AM (0/0)
The competition is here if you look — marshm, October 24 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)
ENUM + ICANN-granted E.164 policy control + trademark rights — Judith Oppenheimer, October 20 @ 12:44 AM (1/1)

such a boring conventional standardisation — jefsey, Sat 7:30 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:39 PM (0/0)

.tel Application by Number.tel LLC — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:05 PM (19/27)

Let's go forward — MSisson, 12:06 AM (0/0)
Support for Number.tel — massoudsaghafi, 10:48 PM (0/0)
absurd ".tel" — jefsey, 3:52 AM (0/0)
Support for number.tel ( Indian Scenario) — mkcpandey, Fri 7:26 AM (0/0)
Support for Number.tel — chittiphan, Fri 4:17 AM (0/0)
After reading all tree proposals — R.Jackson, Wed 10:52 PM (1/2)

You may need to review the Number.tel proposal! — MrTLD, Thu 2:07 AM (1/1)

you also make mistakes Mr TLD :-) — R.Jackson, Thu 12:50 AM (0/0)

Number.tel — jcbelden, Wed 7:04 PM (0/0)
Common sense dictates .tel implementation — jdavids, Tue 7:35 PM (0/0)
Support for Taiwan's Number.tel — jessica, Tue 5:53 AM (0/0)
Support for Number.tel ... — hdarbari, Tue 4:58 AM (0/0)
Support for Number .tel — CPD, October 29 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)

support for Number.tel — wu1028, Tue 5:09 AM (0/0)

Support for Number.tel — shirleyelmer, October 29 @ 3:21 PM (0/0)
Support for the .tel TLD and Number.tel — guentherj, October 28 @ 7:23 AM (0/0)
Support for Number.tel — cbc, October 27 @ 10:21 PM (0/0)
Support for Number.tel — jdavids, October 27 @ 9:04 PM (1/1)

Support for the .tel TLD — Jenna_3052, Thu 3:00 AM (0/0)

Support for Number.tel — fairminded, October 27 @ 7:29 PM (0/0)
Number.tel — leann, October 25 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
Number.tel — BJ Hemphill, October 25 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:40 PM (1/4)

support .tel TLD! — moaguilar, October 23 @ 4:39 PM (1/3)

support .tel TLD — maggiem, October 24 @ 1:23 AM (2/2)

number.tel — antonyvc, October 26 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
Number.tel — LisaL, October 25 @ 3:50 PM (0/0)

.tel Application by Telnic Limited — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:04 PM (14/15)

Let's go forward — MSisson, 12:02 AM (0/0)
I stringly OPPOSE the ".tel" concept — jefsey, Sat 7:39 PM (0/0)
.TEL — Garf, Fri 1:02 PM (0/0)
.Tel — wolfy, Fri 9:44 AM (0/0)
.tel by telnic — Andrew Hossain, Fri 1:04 AM (0/0)
Services vs. device addressing — Serge, Thu 9:13 PM (0/0)
Flexibility — steve smith, Thu 11:09 AM (0/0)
a real difference — spencer, Thu 10:27 AM (0/0)
Seems Reasonable — graftonw, Thu 8:39 AM (0/0)
Both impractical and completely out of ICANN’s jurisdiction — MrTLD, Thu 1:47 AM (0/0)
After reading all three proposals..... — R.Jackson, Wed 10:49 PM (0/0)
telnic application — noisy, Wed 5:41 PM (0/0)
Great Idea — RobTaylor, October 26 @ 9:57 AM (1/1)

.tel / Telnic — PaulRS, October 26 @ 10:55 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:41 PM (0/0)

.travel Application by International Air Transport Association — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:04 PM (161/200)

IATA is the Wrong Choice — thehacker, 11:35 PM (1/1)

IATA the right choice — Truthseeker, 11:54 PM (0/0)

Amtrak Support for IATA's .travel proposal — tomk, 11:06 PM (0/0)
Supplemental Comments of IATA in Support of .travel tld — IATA.travel Team, 10:52 PM (0/0)
OSSN Is Opposed to IATA Dot Travel Application — OSSN, 10:29 PM (0/0)
ACTA Canada on IATA application — ACTA Canada, 4:43 PM (0/0)
ARTA Opposes IATA Proposal — ARTA, 3:20 PM (1/1)

ARTA Untruths — Truthseeker, 11:24 PM (0/0)

the essence of internet violated by this proposal — whyinternet, 10:06 AM (0/0)
KPMG Consulting LP supports IATA's proposal for "DOT.TRAVEL" — kpmg, Sat 7:12 PM (0/0)
Question for .travel — PHXbird, Sat 6:20 PM (0/0)
Days Off Travel opposes IATA's proposal to control .travel domain — Days Off Travel, Sat 12:55 AM (0/0)
Opposition to "dot.travel" and IATA application — travelocity, Fri 11:35 PM (1/1)

Yes to IATA; No to Travelocity Monopoly! — Gullivers_Travel, Sat 10:29 AM (0/0)

IATA - BAD CHOICE — mjacobs, Fri 11:24 PM (0/0)
IATA Should Not Control Travel TLD — rmorgan, Fri 10:54 PM (0/0)
Comments on IATA ".travel" Application — Travel Industry Association of America, Fri 10:24 PM (0/0)
IATA is N O T a good selection — WWS2, Fri 10:02 PM (0/0)
Lot of questions here... — PHXbird, Fri 6:38 PM (0/0)
IH&RA supports the ". travel" application — Christiane Dhorne, Fri 5:55 PM (0/0)
Support from SITA World Travel (Nepal) — SITA World Travel (Nepal), Fri 5:52 PM (0/0)
Support from Israeli Government Tourism Office for the Nordic Countries — Nir Raz, Fri 5:49 PM (0/0)
Southeast Travel Corp support to ". travel" application — Remedios A. Raymundo, Fri 5:43 PM (0/0)
Wide World Travel-Mister Vacation Supports IATA".travel" — Tim Madden, Fri 5:36 PM (0/0)
Bill Healy Travel Supports IATA".travel" — Bill Healy, Fri 5:34 PM (0/0)
Support to IATA".travel" from Gill Airways — Stan Abbott, Fri 5:32 PM (0/0)
AEA support ".travel"TLD — K.H. Neumeister, Fri 5:13 PM (0/0)
UFTAA announces support for IATA ".travel" proposal — B.Backman, Fri 4:33 PM (0/0)
China Air Services supports IATA ". travel"Application — Sun Yi, Fri 4:18 PM (0/0)
Support of CITS to IATA ". travel"Application — China International Travel Service (CITS, Fri 4:17 PM (0/0)
Golf Tours St.Andrews GmbH: Support to IATA ".travel"Application — W. R. Neumann, Fri 3:03 PM (0/0)
Support IATA's bid to sponsor ".travel" — cpaone, Fri 2:46 PM (0/0)
IACA support to IATA ".traver" Application — Alan L. Brown, Fri 1:54 PM (0/0)
Citbank supports IATA's proposal — Telfer, Fri 12:32 AM (0/0)
Federation of Air Transport User Representatives in Europe suppors IATA proposal — Philip Martin, Fri 11:44 AM (0/0)
Support from WTO to IATA Application — Dr. D.J. de Villiers, Fri 11:33 AM (0/0)
Aeroport de Paris support IATA .travel TLD application — Aeroport de Paris (ADP), Fri 11:24 AM (0/0)
CAE Electronics' support of IATA to sponsor a ".travel"TLD — S. Isaacs, Fri 11:00 AM (0/0)
BAA plc supports IATA Application — Richard Everitt, Fri 10:46 AM (0/0)
Support for the 'travel'TLD — Paul Mencinger, Fri 10:21 AM (0/0)
Support to IATA Application from the IAPA — Britta Ashu, Fri 8:44 AM (0/0)
Federation of International Youth Travel Organisations support IATA proposal — Peter de Jong, Fri 8:42 AM (0/0)
Support to IATA Application from the Association of Language Travel Organisations — Marcella ray Kutek, Fri 8:03 AM (0/0)
World Youth and Student Travel Conference supports IATA Application — Susan Goldstein, Fri 7:57 AM (0/0)
International Union of Railways (U.I.C.) supports IATA ".travel"Application — Jean-François Gygax, Fri 7:53 AM (0/0)
WTTC support to IATA ".travel"Application — WTTC, Fri 7:48 AM (0/0)
ASTA Reaches Compromise with IATA — stephm, Thu 9:39 PM (2/2)

ASTA not representative of all travel agents — dbtoursint, Fri 5:57 PM (0/0)
Citibank supports IATA's proposal — Telfer, Fri 12:25 AM (0/0)

Fairchild Dornier Supports IATA Proposal — clay10, Thu 8:43 PM (0/0)
Support for IATA — gomission, Thu 8:05 PM (0/0)
Re: IATA .travel — Randy1989, Thu 4:05 PM (0/0)
Support IATA Proposal to sponsor '.travel. TLD — Peter Morrisroe, Thu 3:12 PM (0/0)
i wings supports IATA proposal for .Travel TLD — iwings, Thu 3:01 PM (1/1)

A Bargain Airfare, Inc. in favor of .Travel TLD proposal — ABA, Thu 5:19 PM (0/0)

Messe Service Leipzig comment on IATA ".travel" Application — MESSE SERVICE Leipzig, Thu 11:49 AM (1/1)

support of Eurostar Group UK to IATA ".travel" Application — Eurostar Group UK, Thu 3:56 PM (0/0)

Weitzer Hotels comment on IATA ".travel" Application — Weitzner Hotels, Thu 11:46 AM (0/0)
Comment on IATA ". travel"Application — Aviation and Tourism International, Thu 11:29 AM (0/0)
Comment on IATA ". travel"Application — VIA Rail Canada, Thu 11:27 AM (0/0)
.travel — tbs, Thu 10:47 AM (0/0)
AASA comment on IATA ".travel"Application — Airlines Association of Southern Africa , Thu 10:22 AM (0/0)
AFRAA Comment on IATA ".travel" Application — African Airlines Association (AFRAA), Thu 10:14 AM (0/0)
TLD travel — jimbeach, Wed 7:02 PM (0/0)
We approve of IATA's proposal — messeservice, Wed 3:34 PM (0/0)
DOT TRAVEl — aloha6560, Wed 2:59 PM (0/0)
ACCOR Asia Pacific Division Comment on IATA ".travel" Application — IATA .travel Team, Wed 2:49 PM (0/0)
Comments on IATA ". travel" Application — IATA .travelTeam, Wed 11:48 AM (0/0)
Tourism Tasmania Support IATA Proposal — asprott, Wed 6:14 AM (0/0)
IATA Wants To Gouge The Travel Industry — stephan, Wed 1:34 AM (0/0)
IATA = Communism — Normand, Wed 1:11 AM (0/0)
IATA WANTS TO GOUGE THE TRAVEL INDUSTRY — stephan, Wed 12:29 AM (0/0)
SAY NO TO IATA — Leslie, Tue 8:54 PM (0/0)
make it a global discussion before acting — travelc, Tue 5:07 PM (0/0)
IATA-TLD.travel — nodot, Tue 3:34 PM (0/0)
IATA Proposal for ".travel" — CANSO, Tue 11:09 AM (0/0)
IATA proposal — garyl, Mon 7:51 PM (0/0)
BOGUS TRAVELHACKER — oskarluts, Mon 7:02 PM (0/0)
PROPOSED MERGER — Kip, Mon 6:52 PM (0/0)
Totally opposed to IATA proposal — Valarie J, Mon 5:41 PM (1/1)

IATA WANTS TO GOUGE THE TRAVEL INDUSTRY — stephan, Wed 1:04 AM (0/0)

IATAN should not be allowed to control .travel — dltravel, October 29 @ 4:55 PM (0/0)
IATAN already has one monopoly — doncorley, October 29 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
IATA APPLICATION FOR TRAVEL — Royal Jordanian Airline, October 28 @ 7:41 AM (0/0)
LanChile supports the IATA proposal — AlvaroSostin, October 27 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)
TLDs — bud@gktravel, October 27 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)
.TRAVEL PROPOSAL BY IATA — deosaran, October 27 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
Is dot-travel necessary? The category is too broad for only IATA — JoshFriedmanIDC, October 27 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)
.travel / IATA is a Cartel !!! — canada, October 27 @ 4:12 PM (0/0)
dot travel is too broad to be left in the hands of IATA/Airlines — tjs, October 27 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)
IATAN registering TLD domain — Faro, October 27 @ 2:51 PM (0/0)
Support for IATA proposal — dal, October 27 @ 1:17 PM (1/1)

Iata: AccesRail supports .travel — apopescu, October 27 @ 3:24 PM (0/0)

ATPCO Support of IATA .travel proposal — hsienkiewicz, October 27 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)
SAir Group supports IATA's proposal — Brigitte, October 27 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)
IATA in control of dot-travel TLD — skibum, October 27 @ 8:35 AM (0/0)
IATA's application for .travel TLD — JAL, October 27 @ 5:47 AM (0/0)
IATA is the Wrong Choice — thehacker, October 27 @ 4:59 AM (0/0)
Agree with IATA Travel TDL — jim.dullum, October 26 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)
IATAN ownership of .travel — leigh ann, October 26 @ 9:39 PM (0/0)
Power Grab By the Airlines — Global View, October 26 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
IATA Application — ACTA Canada, October 26 @ 8:08 PM (0/0)
Dot Travel — RainiPA, October 26 @ 6:40 PM (0/0)
IATA - concerns — barmar, October 26 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)
Support for IATA Proposal — aa, October 26 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)
IATA proposal to sponsor the .travel TLD — Baillie, October 26 @ 3:29 PM (0/0)
Lufthansa eCommerce supports IATA's proposal — Lufthansa//eCommerce GmbH, October 26 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)
IATA request for .Travel TLD — djbytown, October 26 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
I vote NO for IATA and .travel!!!! — cmania1, October 26 @ 11:44 AM (1/1)

IATA Application to Icann for .travel TLD — MelanieC, Mon 8:25 PM (0/0)

SUPPORT OF IATA.TRAVEL PROPOSAL — eherrero, October 26 @ 11:12 AM (0/0)
Support to .travel — NForgeard, October 26 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
IATAN is bad for small business! — DonCorley, October 26 @ 8:15 AM (1/1)

SWISSPORT to support IATA .travel proposal — uvoneuw, Thu 4:55 PM (0/0)

IATA application for registrar of .travel TLD — iktravel, October 26 @ 6:13 AM (0/0)
IATA's proposal make good sense — airlaw, October 26 @ 12:45 AM (0/0)
IATA — Commenter, October 25 @ 10:03 PM (0/0)
IATA's Request for use of ICANN .travel — judyparker, October 25 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
Bombardier Aerospace Regional Aircraft Supports IATA's Application — BARA, October 25 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
Kenya Airways supports IATA's proposal — Hussein, October 25 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)
.travel control — scmcswain, October 25 @ 2:48 PM (0/0)
Support of IATA ".travel" proposal — asasvithq, October 25 @ 11:58 AM (0/0)
IATA's proposal should be supported — AAPA, October 25 @ 9:32 AM (0/0)
IATA .travel TLD — Dgee5, October 24 @ 10:26 PM (0/0)
IATA's .Travel proposal — kemp84, October 24 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)
IATA — rosellla, October 24 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)
IATA application for .travel is bad business — Nordo, October 24 @ 4:51 PM (0/0)
IATA Application for .travel Domain — Donna Tribbie, October 24 @ 4:49 PM (0/0)
IATA's proposal unacceptable — msteward, October 24 @ 4:12 PM (1/1)

renenheku — DBToursInt, October 27 @ 6:04 PM (0/0)

IATA's application for .travel TLD — vivant, October 24 @ 1:16 PM (0/0)
PATA Supports IATA's Proposal — hikida, October 24 @ 9:25 AM (0/0)
IATA should not control new .travel TLD — bh0205, October 23 @ 5:16 PM (0/0)
IATA and Dot Travel — gapjmp, October 23 @ 4:52 PM (1/1)

Dot Travel — gapjmp, October 24 @ 4:56 PM (0/0)

IATA .travel TLD — ncc, October 23 @ 3:23 PM (1/1)

IATA - Too Much Control — bjo, October 24 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

Change is good — tfardell, October 23 @ 2:19 PM (0/0)
IATAN — ochart, October 23 @ 11:55 AM (0/0)
.Travel — znancy, October 22 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)
iata application — travel maven, October 22 @ 3:17 PM (0/0)
IATA proposal for TDL — jans, October 21 @ 4:34 PM (0/0)
.travel — sfdtvl, October 21 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)
.travel to IATA? -- bad idea? — PHXbird, October 21 @ 1:40 AM (0/0)
International Air Transport Association (IATA) application to manage and control ".travel" — gdm, October 21 @ 1:21 AM (0/0)
IATA application for .travel domain name — travdesign, October 21 @ 1:10 AM (2/2)

IATA's hand in the cookie jar — tmcb1, October 24 @ 5:57 AM (0/0)
IATA APPLICATION SHOULD BE NIXED — aotasusan, October 21 @ 8:43 PM (0/0)

Why IATA should not be accepted — Baton, October 20 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)
IATA is the wrong choice — Pilgrim, October 20 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)
A Question for USTAR — frequent traveller, October 20 @ 2:31 PM (1/7)

USTAR's Objection to IATA's Application — USTAR, October 20 @ 4:01 PM (1/6)

USTAR's Non-Answer — frequent traveller, October 20 @ 4:39 PM (1/5)

USTAR's Answer is Totally Responsive — USTAR, October 20 @ 6:59 PM (1/4)

What's Your Hidden Agenda, USTAR? — frequent traveller, October 20 @ 7:21 PM (2/3)

" TRAVEL " is FAR MORE than just airlines — gomw, October 23 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
USTAR Has No Agenda - IATA is Simply Unsuitable — USTAR, October 20 @ 8:31 PM (1/1)

ICANN not Running PopularityContest — Need2Know2, October 21 @ 9:18 AM (0/0)

IATA & .travel — LBerry, October 20 @ 2:25 PM (0/0)
Support to IATA ".travel " proposal — aaco, October 20 @ 10:46 AM (2/2)

Support of IATA dot travel TLD application — aital, October 20 @ 7:31 PM (0/0)
IATA is Not Independent and Not without Bias — USTAR, October 20 @ 11:57 AM (0/0)

IATA Dot Travel — elbelle, October 20 @ 7:02 AM (0/0)
The real reason behind these protests — ielbury, October 20 @ 1:20 AM (1/1)

Travel Agents are Not Against .travel - Just IATA as Registrar — USTAR, October 20 @ 5:31 AM (0/0)

".travel" application — TBlair, October 19 @ 7:34 PM (0/0)
IATA Policies far to restrictive for this proposed TLD string — global view, October 19 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)
Say NO to dot travel — pentay, October 19 @ 7:17 PM (0/0)
IATA ownership of .travel — bc544960, October 19 @ 5:18 PM (0/0)
.travel Application by IATA — PMCCUNE, October 19 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)
IATA application for .travel — elantravel, October 19 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
IATA application for .Travel — paulk, October 19 @ 4:09 PM (0/0)
IATAN i.e. "THE AIRLINES" Let's add to a monopoly — greenfire, October 19 @ 4:07 PM (0/0)
IATA application for.travel domain — tmtravel, October 19 @ 3:30 PM (0/0)
A Reply from the IATA dot-travel Team — dot-travel, October 19 @ 2:46 PM (2/2)

IATA Airlines Do Not Partner Well with Outsiders - Control is the Goal — USTAR, October 22 @ 3:55 PM (0/0)
IATA's application for the .travel TLD — Strategies, October 19 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)

IATA's application for .travel domain name — makie, October 19 @ 2:35 PM (0/0)
IATA Application for TLD of .travel — travwis, October 19 @ 1:15 PM (0/0)
IATA proposal to acquire and control .travel domain names — dhshave, October 19 @ 3:11 AM (0/0)
IATA Should Not be Permitted Ownership of ".travel" — USTAR, October 19 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
.travel application and IATA — Terri Raab, October 19 @ 12:25 AM (0/0)
IATA — tmerkens, October 19 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
IATA application for .travel domain — Traude, October 18 @ 11:46 PM (2/2)

IATA-No way! — Vicki, Tue 9:24 PM (0/0)
IATA application for .travel domain — TravelStore, October 19 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)

.travel and IATA — chaz4, October 18 @ 10:58 PM (1/1)

IATA Application for .travel TLD — connieg, October 19 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)

IATAN .travel — acetrav, October 18 @ 10:46 PM (1/1)

IATAN — hansc, October 18 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:42 PM (1/1)

ICANN — DACHRIST, October 27 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)

Contract with Neustar/JV ? — global view, October 17 @ 7:59 PM (2/3)

Where is your contract with the Neustar/JV — global view, October 18 @ 9:21 PM (1/1)

There's no secret here! — dot-travel, October 19 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)

Contract with Neustar/JV — dot-travel, October 17 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)

This proposal is far too restrictive for a TLD like "travel" — global view, October 17 @ 5:10 PM (1/3)

This proposal — dot-travel, October 17 @ 6:22 PM (2/2)

Opposed to IATA application — ecaccura@sentex.net, October 29 @ 3:49 PM (0/0)
Dot Travel Proposal — davidd, October 19 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)

.union Application by International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:01 PM (106/117)

.union TLD — Dan Yager, 8:14 PM (0/0)
Support for dot union — HRHL, 10:57 AM (0/0)
Support message — kristina, Sat 7:30 PM (0/0)
setting up a union top level domain on the internet — twu, Fri 10:11 PM (0/0)
Support for .union — Manon Ress, Fri 9:14 PM (0/0)
Support for .union — AFA07, Fri 7:09 PM (0/0)
Yes, do it! — meretz, Fri 1:21 PM (0/0)
.union proposal — Daly, Thu 2:46 PM (0/0)
Support for .union — LCJapan, Thu 7:48 AM (0/0)
Support tor .union — Bernie Corbett, Wed 1:25 PM (0/0)
we support the trade union proposal — miquel, Wed 10:25 AM (0/0)
suport for .union — terje, Tue 10:47 PM (0/0)
IPMS supports dot union — Lynn Stephenson, Tue 5:59 PM (0/0)
Support for .union — IFBWW, Tue 4:30 PM (0/0)
support for union — Freek, Tue 6:38 AM (0/0)
.union — ipaterson, Mon 10:08 PM (0/0)
Suport for .union — ovemh, Mon 8:58 PM (0/0)
support for .union — LO-N, Mon 11:25 AM (0/0)
union Application by International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) — stgunnes, Mon 10:07 AM (0/0)
support for .union — Helga Svendsen, Mon 5:23 AM (0/0)
Support for dot union — Magne, October 28 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)
.union proposal — Art, October 28 @ 4:16 AM (0/0)
Pride At Work Supports .union — Kkualii, October 28 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
Support for .union — Richard_S, October 27 @ 3:30 PM (0/0)
Support for .union — violetlight, October 27 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
Support .union — lescault, October 27 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)
ICANN — Niki, October 27 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
Domain union — budreaua, October 27 @ 1:06 PM (0/0)
SUPPORT FOR UNION DOMAIN NAME — arqitekt, October 27 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
support for the ICFTU proposal re tld ".union" — peter murphy, October 27 @ 4:10 AM (0/0)
Support for .union — lobo, October 26 @ 10:58 AM (0/0)
dot union — julie bignell, October 26 @ 8:50 AM (0/0)
Approve ".union" Internet extension — Timothy Engels, October 25 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)
Support for ".union" — gilbert, October 25 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
Support of dot union proposal — Espen, October 25 @ 7:57 AM (0/0)
.union — jceille, October 24 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)
Support for dot.union — sabocat, October 24 @ 2:06 PM (0/0)
whole hearted support of .union — csnead, October 24 @ 1:17 PM (0/0)
Support for dot union — mayafan, October 24 @ 1:05 PM (1/1)

Support for .union — abible, October 24 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)

Support for dot.union — Connect, October 24 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
We support the trade union proposal! — nomet, October 24 @ 9:26 AM (0/0)
support — esr4, October 24 @ 4:17 AM (0/0)
Support for .Union — JRussell, October 23 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)
Support for .union — kwru, October 23 @ 9:19 PM (0/0)
Support for dot union — Perry, October 23 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
No on .union — redbeard, October 23 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)
Support for .union — rmberkowitz, October 23 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)
I strongly support .union — xernaut, October 23 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)
Support for dot .union — MichaelL, October 23 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)
whole hearted support — winnie9898, October 23 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
big buisness — bingo, October 23 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
dot union-application by ICFTU — SPchig, October 23 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
I support noncommercial .union domain — Therese Quinn, October 23 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)
YES — ceberr, October 23 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
Dot.Union - YES — cykonno, October 23 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)
.UNION — rfretel, October 23 @ 7:21 AM (0/0)
support .union — mpolson, October 22 @ 11:49 PM (0/0)
Support for dot union — Brad, October 22 @ 10:52 AM (0/0)
ICFTU application for dotunion TLDs — jasondotcom, October 22 @ 10:49 AM (0/0)
UnionTLD — angie, October 22 @ 8:06 AM (0/0)
dot union — richard55, October 22 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
connect the dots — mbj, October 21 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)
Supporting the dot union/syndicat — Segol, October 21 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)
I support the proposal .union on Internet — orichet, October 21 @ 1:57 PM (2/2)

Support for union.com — Brad , October 22 @ 10:33 AM (0/0)
WHY YOU SHOULD OPPOSE THIS — Richard Flint, October 21 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)

Yes - dot union — salmela, October 21 @ 1:23 PM (0/0)
Support for dot .syndicat — LeGrand, October 20 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
Support for dot union — alevin, October 20 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
I support .union — kilmer, October 20 @ 8:31 PM (1/1)

Support for .union — warmanns, October 20 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)

We support the trade union proposal — Jose Marcos-Sanchez, October 20 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)
Support for .union — Olyves, October 20 @ 1:49 PM (0/0)
YES for new TLD dot union — BETOR, October 20 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)
Support for .union TLD — usdaw, October 20 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)
OK Go on — ARIANA, October 20 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)
Support for dot union — FrancoisM, October 20 @ 12:10 AM (1/1)

support for .union — rachel, October 20 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)

Support for dot union — henri, October 20 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
Support for dot.union — Vadim Borisov, October 20 @ 9:37 AM (0/0)
Support for dot.union — leppik, October 20 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
Not a good idea — Richard Flint, October 19 @ 9:30 PM (1/1)

Response — pruett, October 20 @ 4:59 PM (0/0)

Support for .union — werhane, October 19 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)
Support for ".union" — lmfernandez, October 19 @ 2:39 PM (0/0)
union tld — tutaref, October 19 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)
COSATU supports ICFTU's .union TLD proposal — Charley Lewis (COSATU), October 19 @ 9:15 AM (0/0)
I support .union domain name — edlfler, October 19 @ 4:45 AM (0/0)
tld.union — arun, October 19 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)
support for .union — pgrugan, October 18 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)
support for dot union domain from the UK's TUC — nigel stanley, October 18 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
support for .union — noe420, October 18 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)
support .union — iufmos, October 18 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)
support for .union — Lika Galkina, October 18 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)
Support for dot.union — CTUC, October 18 @ 9:34 AM (0/0)
I support .union — migrantworker, October 18 @ 9:09 AM (1/1)

.union for unions — jcleeland, October 19 @ 2:59 AM (0/0)

.union is universally appropriate — GeneHaldeman, October 18 @ 2:38 AM (0/0)
NUGFW supports dot union — NUGFW, October 17 @ 9:40 PM (0/0)
support for .union — Peter_Cole, October 17 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
More support for dot union — labrlwyr, October 17 @ 7:15 PM (0/0)
The DGC supports the .union TLD application — DGC, October 17 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)
support for .union — davidc, October 17 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
Support for dot.union — Seth Wigderson, October 17 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)
.union tld — co-rowan, October 17 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
Support for .union — JLDENV, October 17 @ 3:17 PM (0/0)
support for .union — mo'sullivan, October 17 @ 5:34 AM (1/1)

support for .union — snichol, October 17 @ 7:02 AM (0/0)

Support for dot.union — asubrigid, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
Support for dot union — ccaruso, October 17 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)
Support for .union — UNI, October 16 @ 1:58 PM (1/1)

.union application hast support from FES — schweise, October 26 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)

Support for dot union — neila, October 16 @ 1:02 PM (1/2)

support zee dot.syndicat — sapacontinent, October 17 @ 4:18 PM (1/1)

support for dot union — bojon, October 28 @ 7:54 PM (0/0)

.web Application by Image Online Design dba Web Registry — Moderator, October 7 @ 9:53 PM (126/442)

My final views on Image Online. — cgrady, 40 minutes ago (0/0)
IOD is a globally recogized stable registry — Gregory W. Krajewski, 10:21 PM (1/2)

Final Letter of Support for .web and Image Online Design — S. Hudgens, 11:21 PM (1/1)

Thanks to everyone who posted!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, 8 minutes ago (0/0)

In RegLand.com already 280 of the TOP 520 .web names are "preregistered". — friedrich, 9:56 PM (0/0)
Say YES! to IOD — first1, 3:42 PM (0/0)
Very serious legal concerns regarding trademark law! — friedrich, 2:11 PM (0/0)
DNSO warning against "pre-registrations" can't affect IOD, due to its unique and special history — fabrcop, 10:28 AM (0/0)
ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness — fabrcop, 10:22 AM (0/0)
IOD issues — useyourhead, 6:54 AM (1/2)

Answer - your presumption is incorrect — cambler, 5:26 PM (1/1)

AGAIN, IOD's integrity at work. This is why they are so heavily supported. BECAUSE WE TRUST THEM. — cgrady, 24 minutes ago (0/0)

Pioneer Preference is best way — netizen1, 5:54 AM (0/0)
The TOP 520 .web names belong to 180 people — friedrich, 3:17 AM (2/2)

I agree! — fabrcop, 10:17 AM (0/0)
and Netsol with blocked names? — theboss, 8:52 AM (0/0)

Another Positive Aspect Of The IOD Application — dcorish, Sun 12:51 AM (0/0)
"Dirt in The Domain Name Game" — jtrade, Sun 12:09 AM (0/0)
NO ! to IOD - NO to .web — SayNoToIOD, Sat 7:45 PM (6/7)

You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements — fabrcop, 10:11 AM (0/0)
Say YES! to IOD :) — first1, Sat 11:15 PM (0/0)
Sir, you do have a right to post here, however not to distort the truth — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sat 11:11 PM (0/0)
Still waiting for your answer to my comments. — friedrich, Sat 10:54 PM (0/0)
You make no Sense — Merlin, Sat 8:10 PM (0/0)
These allegations are, of course, false — cambler, Sat 8:08 PM (1/1)

IOD does deserve an apology from SayNoToIOD — S. Hudgens, 11:33 PM (0/0)

Letters in Support of IOD — jtrade, Sat 7:21 PM (1/1)

They were scanned: 1200x1600 and have 500KB each — friedrich, Sun 12:01 AM (0/0)

Yes IOD no to Afilias/Neustar on .web — pvos, Sat 6:38 PM (0/0)
ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5 — Saskia, Sat 1:10 PM (1/1)

Now the links are fixed... — fabrcop, Sat 6:56 PM (0/0)

IOD should run .WEB — H, Fri 11:09 PM (1/1)

I agree... — fabrcop, Sat 1:11 PM (0/0)

Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON) — fabrcop, Fri 7:37 PM (0/0)
ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5 — saskia, Fri 1:02 PM (0/0)
IOD has earned .WEB through hard work — ar, Fri 6:41 AM (0/0)
Summing it all up.. — netfxmedia, Thu 11:02 PM (0/0)
Say Yes To IOD for the web TLD — JaseK, Thu 9:03 PM (0/0)
ICANNs silence with IOD must be a nod of approval — jeffrey, Thu 2:30 PM (0/0)
CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application! — fabrcop, Thu 1:09 PM (0/0)
What is the point of .web? — james fryer, Thu 12:41 AM (2/7)

Did you compare? — friedrich, Fri 3:11 AM (1/4)

.WEB still seems pointless — james fryer, Fri 9:50 AM (1/3)

Why pointless? — friedrich, Fri 11:23 PM (1/2)

Because it doesn't tell you anything you don't already know — james fryer, Sat 10:48 AM (1/1)

No arguments against .web — friedrich, Sat 9:45 PM (0/0)

<sigh> — For The People, Thu 8:08 PM (1/1)

.WEB — james fryer, Fri 9:52 AM (0/0)

IOD and the Texas republic — SayNoToIOD, Thu 6:58 AM (4/5)

Are you a "self-proclaimed authority"? — friedrich, Fri 11:33 PM (0/0)
This comparison is completely wrong — fabrcop, Thu 9:56 AM (0/0)
Metaphors — For The People, Thu 7:34 AM (0/0)
Texans... — rlangsford, Thu 7:16 AM (1/1)

Texas note — PHXbird, Thu 8:03 PM (0/0)

Give Image Online Design .WEB // Give Afilias .INFO — worldwide, Thu 5:48 AM (0/0)
Alert: Conflicts of Interest Addressed — VikashPatel, Thu 4:59 AM (1/1)

Conflict of interest — rlangsford, Thu 6:52 AM (0/0)

IOD application for .web makes sense to me — veronica, Thu 12:34 AM (0/0)
Moral rights — fabrcop, Wed 2:02 PM (0/0)
.............Why IOD? Over 20,025 Reasons Why — y2k, Mon 9:48 PM (0/0)
ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world — fabrcop, Mon 9:13 PM (2/5)

Grant .WEB to IODesign // Grant .INFO to Afilias — worldwide, Thu 5:54 AM (1/1)

No, monopolies should not be given any domian names — ar, Fri 6:54 AM (0/0)

I agree... — tcleland, Tue 7:39 PM (1/2)

Well said (the perfect choice is: IOD/.web ; Afilias/.info ; Neustar/.site ) — fabrcop, Wed 8:53 AM (1/1)

Do Afilias and Neustar deserve some sort of door prize? — jeffrey, Thu 3:13 PM (0/0)

Ethics in Government: ICANN's Role in .web — mbrittan, October 29 @ 10:57 PM (3/5)

IOD's "prior occupation" — tcleland, Tue 7:52 PM (0/0)
Are we men of little faith when it comes to ICANN? — rlangsford, Mon 5:37 AM (0/0)
first in what — SayNoToIOD, Mon 4:18 AM (2/2)

Waiting for your comments. — friedrich, Mon 7:55 PM (0/0)
Back your comments up! Spewing Rhetoric shows your knowledge about the DNS — Gregory W. Krajewski, Mon 4:43 AM (0/0)

IOD "Pioneer's Preference" Confusion — S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
Desperation — hitz, October 27 @ 6:50 PM (7/12)

Don't you understand that Internet People means IOD registrants?! — fabrcop, Mon 9:31 AM (0/0)
I agree — SayNoToIOD, Mon 2:57 AM (2/2)

Jim Smith — friedrich, Tue 9:54 AM (0/0)
You're kidding, right? — For The People, Mon 7:12 AM (0/0)

Hitz=Wiredz=Moron — dtan, October 28 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
Is this the best you can do? — cambler, October 27 @ 9:02 PM (2/3)

Some messages don't deserve a response. — S. Hudgens, October 28 @ 1:39 PM (0/0)
Nice To Have You Back! — Mario, October 27 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)

Not quite back :-) — cambler, October 27 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)

Prove it. — For The People, October 27 @ 8:05 PM (0/0)
Hear Is What We Fear, "hitz" — pilot2, October 27 @ 7:19 PM (0/0)
hitz your an idiot — Merlin, October 27 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)

IOD's Application For .WEB Qualifies, At Very Least, For "Pioneer's Preference" Exemption — pilot2, October 27 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)

I agree... ICANN cannot create a scandal — fabrcop, Mon 8:16 AM (0/0)

ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence) — fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:30 PM (1/1)

Hello? — hitz, October 27 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)

What Happens to the Pre-registrations if IOD doesn't get .Web? — lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:33 AM (1/2)

or "...if IOD does get .Web?" — Mario, October 26 @ 5:17 AM (1/1)

I think that IOD and IOD registrants must be considered together as a single entity... — fabrcop, October 26 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)

vote for IOD - see interview Dyson - our request trademark NSI — ted, October 26 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
the jury will say no — SayNoToIOD, October 25 @ 11:35 PM (3/3)

Now you even insult juries of being stupid ... — friedrich, Tue 10:28 AM (0/0)
I don't understand your arguments — fabrcop, October 26 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
Not for anything... — For The People, October 25 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)

The JV Team's wants to turn ".WEB" into ".bigbucks" — TLD Facts, October 25 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
who had the original idea? — theboss, October 25 @ 7:37 PM (1/1)

If you're new to this arguement read teh MSNBC article (link in message) — daved, Thu 4:43 PM (0/0)

ICANN vs IOD — Doc Again, October 25 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
To: C.Ambler, IOD . IMPORTANT QUESTIONS. — IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/7)

Answer — cambler, October 25 @ 8:03 PM (2/6)

Hmmmm — hitz, October 27 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)

"hitz", Should We Consider You A Representative From An Applicant? — pilot2, October 27 @ 6:44 PM (0/0)

Please let me know the real meaning of the lawsuit... — IODskeptic, October 26 @ 6:45 PM (1/3)

Lawyers — cambler, October 26 @ 7:18 PM (1/2)

Conflicting statements — hitz, October 27 @ 6:18 PM (1/1)

Not conflicting at all — cambler, October 27 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)

I encourage everyone to read IOD's application - I would like to know what others are thinking!! I — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 5:56 AM (1/1)

Dealing with the past — TLD Facts, October 25 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)

MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:56 AM (3/8)

msnbc-meeks-icann — webster, October 26 @ 5:42 PM (3/5)

You form part of those 16 people who have posted many comments. — friedrich, October 27 @ 3:20 PM (0/0)
Who Made You God? — enforcer, October 26 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
Crocker is conflicted — cambler, October 26 @ 7:12 PM (1/2)

Biased opinions? — hitz, October 27 @ 6:24 PM (1/1)

Is that really the best that you can do? — Doc Again, October 28 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

MSNBC Article: Compelling! A Must Read! — pilot2, October 25 @ 10:52 PM (0/0)
Very interesting and important articole! — fabrcop, October 25 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)

Chris — CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)
IOD, what does that stands for? — anonymous, October 24 @ 5:56 AM (1/3)

Not Another Monopoly — cambler, October 24 @ 8:01 AM (1/2)

Nice shot at other .web applicants — hitz, October 27 @ 6:29 PM (1/1)

To Correct You Sir, Don't Blame IOD For This "Question & Answer" Forum — pilot2, October 27 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)

IOD and Ken Stubbs — Merlin, October 24 @ 12:18 AM (4/4)

On the Money! — first1, October 25 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
This Article is definitely worth a look!!! — VikashPatel, October 24 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
Your Dead Right — enforcer, October 24 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)
I AGREE — VikashPatel, October 24 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)

Some arguments pro/contra IODs .web ... please read! — friedrich, October 23 @ 7:08 PM (1/1)

I agree — fabrcop, October 23 @ 7:42 PM (0/0)

The truth about .web (short version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:26 PM (1/1)

Excellent Post!!! — VikashPatel, October 24 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)

The truth about .web (long version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:21 PM (1/1)

Vote yes to IOD - there is an indisputable argument for doing so posted here. — joannalane, Wed 7:24 PM (0/0)

The success of new TLDs rests right here... — Rob, October 23 @ 3:23 AM (0/0)
IOD's willingness to field questions in this forum & Afilias' absence thereof — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:55 PM (1/5)

Your answer is. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:07 PM (1/4)

Perhaps... — Hudgens, October 22 @ 9:19 PM (1/3)

Media — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:32 PM (1/2)

I had an interview on Friday....with the National Journal Technical Daily... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)

Interview — Hudgens, October 22 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)

MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY. PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!! — Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:29 PM (2/14)

Facilitator — Mario, October 22 @ 8:34 PM (0/0)
Facilitator------YOU are way out of line. Cut it out! You are spamming this everywhere. — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 7:40 PM (1/12)

World Thoughts — Facilitator, October 22 @ 8:07 PM (1/11)

Reply — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 8:43 PM (2/10)

Remember — Facilitator, October 22 @ 9:12 PM (1/6)

Sir. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:39 PM (1/5)

Thank you both — cambler, October 22 @ 9:42 PM (3/4)

More useless noise here !! — global view, October 23 @ 3:46 AM (1/1)

With all due respect. . . — World Thoughts, October 23 @ 4:02 AM (0/0)

My Feelings As Well — Facilitator, October 23 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
Thank you as well. — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)

Letter of support for IOD. — Hudgens, October 22 @ 9:00 PM (1/2)

I will post it. — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:09 PM (1/1)

Letter — Hudgens, October 22 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)

.web is lousy proposal — SayNoToIOD, October 22 @ 5:43 PM (3/5)

Sir, ... — friedrich, October 25 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
Not again! — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:21 PM (1/2)

That chap. — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 8:32 PM (1/1)

How true — Hudgens, October 22 @ 8:40 PM (0/0)

Hey, pal. . . — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)

CLEAR the DATABASE then give em .web — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 11:26 PM (5/6)

and then 10,000 .web domains are.. — thecurve, Sat 2:01 PM (0/0)
Then clear .com either... (Including pre-registrations taken in 1993) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 8:36 AM (0/0)
Laughable. — For The People, October 22 @ 1:43 AM (0/0)
That Would Breach Contracts — pilot, October 22 @ 1:23 AM (0/0)
Jealousy — Merlin, October 21 @ 11:38 PM (1/1)

well said — thecurve, Sat 2:05 PM (0/0)

IOD - the ultimate CYBERSQUATTER - to be sold out — GPine, October 21 @ 8:11 AM (3/6)

You are indirectly supporting IOD, Mr. Pinhurst — friedrich, October 23 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)
Trademarks! — first1, October 21 @ 4:41 PM (1/2)

Supporting trademarks helps us all -kudos to IOD — pvos, October 24 @ 4:51 PM (1/1)

An address cannot violate a trademark and a domain name is an address — friedrich, October 27 @ 3:41 PM (0/0)

Trademarks & Cybersquatters — pilot, October 21 @ 12:05 AM (1/1)

trademark should be seperate from domains — thecurve, Sat 2:08 PM (0/0)

Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:49 AM (2/2)

Say no to a monopoly. — Hudgens, October 23 @ 1:57 AM (0/0)
Self-proclaimed??! IANA did authorize IOD in 1996 — fabrcop, October 21 @ 1:43 PM (0/0)

When is the decision on .web going to be made? — VikashPatel, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/1)

---> On November 16!? (Who knows more: please confirm, or let me know the correct info) — fabrcop, October 24 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)

....................Why IOD? Over 20,017 Reasons why — Y2K, October 20 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
Let's Discuss the issues...IOD has an excellent plan..People in place..Give competition a chance!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 1:14 AM (1/1)

Yes, Let's Add A Few More Good Reasons — Facilitator, October 20 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)

Illusions — global view, October 20 @ 12:27 AM (7/13)

What does the "we" stand for ...? — friedrich, October 23 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)
Incidentally, "Global View" — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 1:47 AM (0/0)
Global View With A Peewee Perspective — Facilitator, October 20 @ 6:24 PM (0/0)
Your Hurting — enforcer, October 20 @ 6:35 AM (0/0)
Much Too ambiguous answer from Mr ambler — global view, October 20 @ 1:53 AM (2/6)

If I might chime in. . . — For The People, October 20 @ 2:00 AM (1/2)

Actually, I don't mind... — cambler, October 20 @ 2:06 AM (1/1)

Mr. Ambler. . . — For The People, October 20 @ 2:22 AM (0/0)

Fine... — cambler, October 20 @ 1:58 AM (1/2)

why do we ask mr ambler — global view, October 20 @ 2:50 AM (1/1)

Here are my comments to you MR Global....(funny, name!) — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 3:15 AM (0/0)

Answer — cambler, October 20 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
No Illusion — Merlin, October 20 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)

Cyber Squatting — Bit, October 19 @ 4:46 AM (3/5)

cybersquatting? — Ryan4, October 21 @ 8:10 AM (0/0)
Do you know what "Cybersquatting" IS? — For The People, October 19 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)
@iodesign.com? — cambler, October 19 @ 5:06 AM (1/2)

news.web — mbrittan, October 19 @ 2:46 PM (1/1)

Ah! — cambler, October 19 @ 10:40 PM (0/0)

IOD: THE RIGHT _AND_ LOGICAL CHOICE — dtan, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
Support of application for .web — gmack3, October 18 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)
TO ICANN BOARD Members: This will be the official string for comments relating to IOD's Application. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:40 PM (2/11)

webs of convenience — timhaynes, October 21 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)
.web concerns - please address — David Coombs, October 17 @ 8:52 PM (1/9)

Answers from IOD — cambler, October 17 @ 9:34 PM (2/8)

When is the final decision on .web going to be made? — VikashPatel, October 19 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)
Sole registrar and cost of registry — David Coombs, October 17 @ 10:04 PM (1/6)

Thank you — cambler, October 17 @ 10:33 PM (1/5)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Freezing registrations? Where on your app? — IODskeptic, October 18 @ 2:18 PM (1/4)

Answer — cambler, October 18 @ 7:52 PM (1/3)

OK, E5.1 and E5.2 in your application — IODskeptic, October 19 @ 1:51 PM (1/2)

Sorry - I mean E5.1 and E5.3 (not E5.2) — IODskeptic, October 19 @ 1:53 PM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, October 20 @ 2:09 AM (0/0)

The Marketing of the Dot Web TLD..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)
.web opinion — Stef, October 17 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
Give it to IOD — petemillar, October 17 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
Owning Multiple Domain Names: A Shared Domain Service Business — mbrittan, October 17 @ 9:05 AM (5/5)

.web pre-registrations — VikashPatel, October 19 @ 3:36 AM (0/0)
You have my support....Extremely visionary ideas you have, sir... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 18 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
Marc Brittan's operation — PHXbird, October 18 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)
Nice To Hear From You — enforcer, October 17 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
Mr. Brittan — jtrade, October 17 @ 9:49 AM (0/0)

Dot Web Registry... — rlangsford, October 17 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
IOD is the best choice — weblord, October 17 @ 6:33 AM (1/1)

ciforugo — weblord, October 17 @ 6:34 AM (0/0)

.WEB solo puede ser manejado por IODesign..... — ciudad, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
VOTE YES ON IOD'S APPLICATION FOR .WEB. A WINNING CHOICE FOR A DESERVING COMPANY. WAY TO GO IOD!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
I support Image Online for .web.... — pirani, October 17 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
I Support Image Online's .web application. — jayt, October 17 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
Friend of a Competitive Internet. — jtrade, October 17 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
Internet Stability !? — stuart, October 16 @ 11:53 PM (1/1)

The Internet has already fragmented. This is a GOOD thing. — cgrady, October 17 @ 9:45 PM (0/0)

I support IOD's .web application. — markh, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
Playing fair — British, October 16 @ 11:42 PM (5/11)

tearoom, breakfest, harrods, picadilly, landlady, ... take your chance to register them! — friedrich, October 27 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
OK, Then Let's Recall All .COMs, NETs, ORGs, and .UK — pilot, October 17 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
ICANN knows — BrianC, October 17 @ 5:52 AM (3/5)

ICANN's Warning About "Pre-registrations" — pilot, October 17 @ 2:25 PM (0/0)
To correct you ...... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:21 AM (1/2)

To correct you sir. — global view, October 20 @ 12:13 AM (1/1)

No really, let me correct you, sir... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)

That statement you refer to — For The People, October 17 @ 8:17 AM (0/0)

Squatted? — For The People, October 17 @ 1:50 AM (1/1)

Squatted? That's humorous — jandl, October 19 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)

The Beginnning — For The People, October 17 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)

Read the applications and you will see that IODesign is the best choice for .web — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #5 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:26 AM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 9:04 PM (0/0)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #4 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:25 AM (3/3)

re: IOD and limited liability (nonrefundable reg fees) — pvos, October 24 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)
Why Image Online's .WEB Registry Exists — cgrady, October 17 @ 5:33 AM (0/0)
Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #3 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #2 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)

To C.Ambler, IOD: Question #1 — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)

My $35 registration fee. — cgrady, October 17 @ 5:08 AM (0/0)
Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)

TO ICANN: This will be our official pro Dot Web and IOD string.......PLEASE POST UNDERNEATH... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:47 PM (18/21)

Support of IOD — jweb, 3:06 PM (0/0)
Give .WEB to IODesign // .INFO to Afilias — worldwide, Thu 6:05 AM (0/0)
In support of IOD and the .web appliation — Anthony, October 23 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)
I Support Dot Web and IOD — jumper, October 18 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
Manufacturer Supports .WEB — pilot, October 17 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
Don't Forget To Ask This Person For Support... — AdvantaTel, October 17 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)

Special help — PHXbird, October 17 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)

A non .web registrant in support of IOD — md, October 16 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
I think that it is fair that IODesign runs the .web registry — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)
Support IOD — first1, October 16 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)
IODesign is most deserving of .web — .webSupporter, October 16 @ 1:05 PM (0/0)
I support .web and IOD, because... — saskia, October 16 @ 11:25 AM (1/1)

Full support for IOD from Poland! — arcadius, October 17 @ 12:13 AM (0/0)

Break the NSI (DoC) monopoly! — Rob, October 16 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
IOD supporter — enforcer, October 16 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)
I support IODs application for .web — friedrich, October 15 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)
I support .web and IOD — treherne, October 15 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)

I support IOD — sascha, October 16 @ 10:23 AM (0/0)

I support .web and IOD, diversity and small business WORLDWIDE! — Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
I Support Dot Web and IOD — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
.web network — liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)

Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? — friedrich, October 15 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)
Full support of IO Designs .web application — friedrich, October 15 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
IOD Application — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
Interlecuctal property is protected — doc, October 15 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)

SUNRISE PERIOD! — first1, October 15 @ 5:38 PM (1/1)

i agree — thecurve, Sat 2:15 PM (0/0)

WHERE'S THE GLOBAL COMMITTMENT HERE ? — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:03 AM (3/5)

Global Concerns — cambler, October 15 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)
Global Commitment By Applicants — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 3:43 PM (2/2)

Corrections — PHXbird, October 15 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
More About Global Commitment ... — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

Touche! — anthony, October 15 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)

THE REAL FACTS ABOUT IO DESIGN — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 10:22 AM (2/10)

Small Corrections from IOD — cambler, October 15 @ 6:43 PM (1/7)

A question — BrianC, October 15 @ 11:42 PM (1/6)

Answer — cambler, October 16 @ 7:06 PM (2/5)

Well done, Mr. Ambler! I really, really admire you — wiredz, October 20 @ 7:38 PM (2/2)

Still waiting for an answer... — cambler, October 22 @ 5:10 AM (0/0)
Sue? — cambler, October 20 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)

RE: Answer — jwatts, October 16 @ 7:47 PM (1/1)

The Past — cambler, October 16 @ 8:51 PM (0/0)

LIE BE TOLD — fabrcop, October 15 @ 1:28 PM (1/1)

:oÞ — liquidsilver, October 15 @ 6:02 PM (0/0)

I am confident in ICANN's fairness, so .web=IOD — fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
K.I.S.S. — debbie, October 15 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)

Acronyms — PHXbird, October 15 @ 10:37 PM (0/0)

IODesign's .WEB Application — SEZenith, October 15 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
IOD .WEB BID - SUPPORT — Frank S., October 15 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
A Recommendation to Posters. But More Than That--A Call to ICANN — For The People, October 15 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
IOD Lawsuit against IANA — jtrade, October 14 @ 11:48 PM (1/1)

Very useful links for those who do not believe that IOD was authorized by IANA — fabrcop, October 15 @ 9:14 AM (0/0)

Cancel PRE-REGISTRATIONS AT .......IOD — Webster, October 14 @ 11:01 PM (3/5)

.CA is doing it. — JeffB, October 15 @ 9:21 AM (0/0)
IF YOU CANCEL .WEB REGISTRATIONS, THEN SAME FOR .COM, .NET, AND .ORG — pilot, October 15 @ 12:24 AM (1/1)

Cancel Webster's bank account: this is just as absurd as to cancel IOD's registrations — fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:35 AM (0/0)

I don't think so — Merlin, October 14 @ 11:35 PM (1/1)

To Merlin — Webster, October 15 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)

TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot Web/IOD Supporters are getting organized...Building a website!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:56 PM (2/3)

Big mistake — Shayne, October 14 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)
RE: TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: — eedlee, October 14 @ 9:31 PM (1/1)

yup — anthony, October 14 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)

IOD congratulations! A job well done! — first1, October 14 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
I'm Interested. — Abaddon, October 14 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)

Abaddon — Webster, October 14 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)

URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest — Infinity, October 14 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
Image Online Design's claim of Conflict of Interest for Ken Stubbs! — jcowell, October 14 @ 5:09 PM (2/4)

CLEAR the DATABASE and IOD's Suit Threats — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 9:34 PM (2/2)

Sir. . . — For The People, October 21 @ 11:36 PM (0/0)
Sorry, That's Impossible — pilot, October 21 @ 11:10 PM (0/0)

jcowell — PHXbird, October 15 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)

Online Design has worked hard from 1995... — support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
rules for .web tld — jeffB, October 14 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
Come on! Lets have a decent argument! — anthony, October 14 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)
Vote of confidence in IOD and .web — anthony, October 14 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
WOAH!! WOAH!! WOAH!! Can someone please verify this!! — cgrady, October 14 @ 7:08 AM (2/2)

THIS STINKS...I THINK THE MANIPULATION IS OBVIOUS — support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:36 PM (0/0)
Let's go to the source... — marshm, October 14 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

My .web comments for ICANN — BrianC, October 14 @ 7:04 AM (3/13)

YES to IOD — fabrcop, October 14 @ 1:49 PM (0/0)
NO TO IOD — Webster, October 14 @ 11:13 AM (2/3)

Has ICANN already chosen? — first1, October 14 @ 6:58 PM (0/0)
I can't see what you mean! Actually IANA's authorization to IOD can be proved (legally) — fabrcop, October 14 @ 5:10 PM (1/1)

Will You Testify......Under Oath — Webster, October 14 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)

BrianC is right — wiredz, October 14 @ 10:52 AM (4/7)

IOD Application — marshm, October 14 @ 5:06 PM (1/1)

Gene Marsh, read my comments! — wiredz, October 20 @ 4:28 PM (0/0)

Please...LET's stick to the FACTS.....Saying things without giving facts=empty words — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 4:05 PM (1/1)

Gred, read my comments — wiredz, October 20 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)

Wiredz here are the facts — jtrade, October 14 @ 3:37 PM (0/0)
You say nothing. — Infinity, October 14 @ 3:07 PM (1/1)

Infinity, see my comments over your remark — wiredz, October 20 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy — RDM, October 14 @ 5:12 AM (1/2)

Lack of Internal Controls at ICANN? — TheWebster, October 14 @ 6:04 AM (1/1)

IOD reliant partner — Mel, October 14 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)

Give IOD the .Web Registration — Attorney, October 14 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
IODESIGN'S .Web Registration — Unexplored, Inc., October 14 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
My Letter to ICANN — cgrady, October 14 @ 1:05 AM (1/2)

My One Regret — cgrady, October 14 @ 1:47 AM (1/1)

How right you are! — anthony, October 14 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)

TO ALL ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Evidence why the DOT WEB domain and IOD get our VOTE!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 12:55 AM (1/2)

Another Reason to Vote for DOT WEB AND IOD: They WILL protect Trademarked names — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 3:52 AM (1/1)

Another Reason to Vote for DOT WEB AND IOD: They WILL protect Trademarked names — Merlin, October 14 @ 4:31 AM (0/0)

MORE DISCUSSION http://www.icann.com/offtopic/ — BxB, October 13 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)
After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices — saskia, October 13 @ 11:08 PM (1/1)

Internet Spirit — Merlin, October 13 @ 11:30 PM (0/0)

It is fair that ICANN accepts .web registry by IODesign — fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:26 PM (1/1)

Here is the correct link URL (see my previous post) — fabrcop, October 13 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)

What's that Afilias.TV site about?? — spewtlds, October 13 @ 8:20 PM (1/10)

self-interests? — getserious, October 13 @ 8:24 PM (4/9)

Not a serious group?! — sstallings, Wed 1:11 PM (0/0)
How short sighted — cgrady, October 13 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)
I Am IOD Supporter And Serious Business Owner — pilot, October 13 @ 8:41 PM (1/1)

Another serious business person supporting IOD — mjordan, October 14 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)

Self-interests? Of course! — JConnors, October 13 @ 8:39 PM (3/4)

Pardon Me, But I did not Pre-register anything...I REGISTERED my DOT WEB — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 5:58 AM (1/1)

IOD's PRE-REGISTRATION — Webster, October 14 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)

You are either very confused or have a self interest of your own. — cgrady, October 13 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)
You don't have a clue what you're talking about. — Infinity, October 13 @ 10:42 PM (0/0)

Previous Post about IOD and .Web — Merlin, October 13 @ 7:52 PM (2/3)

IOD = GREAT CUSTOMER SERVICE! — first1, October 14 @ 5:03 AM (0/0)
customer service — larreeee, October 14 @ 12:15 AM (1/1)

Customer satisfaction is a result of integrity — PHXbird, October 14 @ 1:14 AM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs, Conflict of Interest? — Merlin, October 13 @ 7:49 PM (3/6)

Why do you think they waited untill the last day to submit their application?? — Debug, October 17 @ 2:51 AM (0/0)
ICANN's task (to choose the best registry for .web) is difficult, but I am confident... — fabrcop, October 13 @ 8:47 PM (1/2)

You Are Correct, Sir. — pilot, October 13 @ 8:55 PM (1/1)

You can post this under Afilias thread — fabrcop, October 13 @ 9:17 PM (0/0)

Boring! — getserious, October 13 @ 8:09 PM (1/1)

Get Real! — mpayette, October 14 @ 2:31 PM (0/0)

Serious doubts — JConnors, October 13 @ 7:01 PM (6/28)

Serious doubts — kcrash, October 23 @ 7:52 AM (0/0)
IOD "the right choice" — first1, October 14 @ 5:17 AM (1/1)

WoW Technology — Webster, October 14 @ 9:56 AM (0/0)

NSI unable to respond? — PHXbird, October 13 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)
You can buy technical expertise, redundant hardware, and reliable bandwidth but YOU CANT BUY... — cgrady, October 13 @ 8:22 PM (1/1)

Tech expertise & Customer support — PHXbird, October 13 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)

"SERIOUS DOUBTS" by JConnors — pilot, October 13 @ 7:28 PM (1/1)

IOD has a world class - innovative registry system - They will be "ready" for Day 1 — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 5:26 AM (0/0)

IOD can handle it! — jtrade, October 13 @ 7:13 PM (1/19)

Risk, stability, reliability — JConnors, October 13 @ 7:26 PM (3/18)

Employees — cambler, October 15 @ 8:36 PM (0/0)
So why do they have 0 employees? — hoffy, October 15 @ 7:00 AM (1/1)

Afilias Employees: 0 but they do have 13 Board Members....This is apples and oranges.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 9:28 PM (0/0)

You make me Laugh Connors — jtrade, October 13 @ 7:35 PM (1/14)

Anti-competitive? — JConnors, October 13 @ 8:29 PM (2/13)

......... Mr. Connors - I wonder why you never talk about the premium-services! — friedrich, October 20 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
JConnor, You Want To Give More TLDs To NSI And Afilias? — pilot, October 13 @ 8:45 PM (1/11)

Logical judgements based on fact, not self-interest — JConnors, October 13 @ 8:54 PM (6/10)

NSI Is The Elephant In The Middle Of The Room — pilot, October 15 @ 10:11 PM (1/2)

NSI and Afilias — PHXbird, October 15 @ 11:07 PM (1/1)

Does NSI want a bigger monopoly?? — manny, October 16 @ 4:39 AM (0/0)

JConnors then why ".web"? — anthony, October 14 @ 1:17 PM (0/0)
Your Wrong JConnors — first1, October 14 @ 4:55 AM (0/0)
Reading applications — PHXbird, October 13 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
You miss a point. — Infinity, October 13 @ 9:42 PM (1/1)

Reply To Infinity — pilot, October 13 @ 9:50 PM (0/0)

We are basing our comments of tangible reality not paper promises in the form of applications. — cgrady, October 13 @ 9:33 PM (1/1)

Here Here! — marshm, October 14 @ 3:22 AM (0/0)

.Web is excellent, Image Online have to be the winner — Carlos, October 13 @ 6:22 PM (2/13)

Only a IOD for .web — ciudad, October 15 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)
.web as new TLD operated by IODesign — marshm, October 13 @ 6:33 PM (3/11)

.web — netjim, October 16 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)
I agree — stuart, October 13 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)
.web TLD — PHXbird, October 13 @ 7:03 PM (1/8)

.WEB Registry - IODesign is the ONLY choice — huckers, October 15 @ 9:28 PM (1/7)

UK - Father of the Internet!! — Georgia_Flyer, October 16 @ 6:27 PM (4/6)

Rule Britannia MKII — trademarklaw, October 19 @ 4:28 PM (0/0)
Rule Britannia — trademarklaw, October 19 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
alert! aol user! — DotMorons, October 17 @ 1:41 AM (1/2)

Alert! Win 98 User! — spewtlds, October 18 @ 3:58 PM (1/1)

Followup — spewtlds, October 18 @ 4:01 PM (0/0)

it was during Al Gore's visit to the UK — abigailc, October 16 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)

General Comments — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:40 PM (445/1407)

This needs to be investigated further and explained in greater detail — cgrady, 7 minutes ago (0/0)
The "Individual" Constituency is not represented, but I thought they should!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, 25 minutes ago (0/0)
Final Thoughts — World Thoughts, 41 minutes ago (0/0)
Too broad or too norrow — johnD, 42 minutes ago (0/0)
Plead to ICANN — cgrady, 12:20 AM (0/0)
Compliments to ICANN! — Robert_Jacobson, 12:06 AM (0/0)
IATA APPLICATION FOR TLD — susansammons, 11:48 PM (1/1)

IATA the right choice — Truthseeker, 11:59 PM (0/0)

http://www.joinfoci.org — jtrade, 11:43 PM (0/0)
Questions for applicants re registrars and resellers — bfellman, 11:42 PM (0/0)
Comments on New TLDs -- Motion Picture Association — TDD, 11:06 PM (0/0)
COMMERCIAL CONNECT: Questionable ties — lapointe, 10:52 PM (0/0)
ISPCP on new TLDs — sastre, 10:23 PM (1/1)

In partial disagreement — cgrady, 11:49 PM (0/0)

Comments on Proposals for New Top Level Domains — Business Constituency, 10:16 PM (2/2)

In response, the Business Constituency is not representative... — Gregory W. Krajewski, 45 minutes ago (0/0)
Image Online Design is the Pioneer! — jtrade, 11:14 PM (0/0)

.union — sbenedict, 9:09 PM (0/0)
.music — TLG 200, 6:33 PM (0/0)
This Forum: Possibly Nothing More Than A Feel-Good Distraction. Just Paranoia? — dcorish, 5:41 PM (0/0)
NSI DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR NEW GTLDS - READ THE PROOF! — friedrich, 5:17 PM (0/0)
“Spectral Web, Inc.’s Comments Regarding the Choice of New Top-Level Domains and Registries” — Spectral Web, Inc., 3:34 PM (1/1)

I fully Support Spectral Web's comments — Gregory W. Krajewski, 20 minutes ago (0/0)

Final comments — huguesdb, 3:31 PM (0/0)
Fair Decision — Jens72, 3:21 PM (1/1)

ICANN can still save itself — anthony 2nd, 11:23 PM (0/0)

Comment on process — jweb, 2:42 PM (0/0)
ICANN: we know you are listening and we are confident in your fairness — fabrcop, 10:32 AM (1/1)

Say YES! to .web and IOD! — first1, 3:38 PM (0/0)

Pioneer Preference is most fair method — netizen1, 5:47 AM (0/0)
More ICANN Bribery? — jtrade, 4:02 AM (0/0)
This is what the law says ... — friedrich, Sun 12:43 AM (2/2)

Very interesting — fabrcop, 9:43 AM (0/0)
Abacus proposes a solution to this — pedro, 5:49 AM (0/0)

"Dirt in The Domain Name Game" — jtrade, Sun 12:21 AM (1/1)

OK, we all know that IOD should be granted .web, however don't accuse ICANN before... — fabrcop, 9:49 AM (0/0)

General opinion — fagzal, Sun 12:07 AM (0/0)
Mr. Ken Stubbs will officially represent CORE in ICANNs Public Meeting in Los Angeles! — friedrich, Sat 11:16 PM (0/0)
ICANN's vision of TLDs for a new order of cyber civilization — R.K. Pillai, Sat 9:03 PM (0/0)
Dissapointing gTLD suggestions... — z00ker, Sat 7:56 PM (0/0)
NO to IOD — SayNoToIOD, Sat 7:46 PM (6/6)

You still have over an hour to admit your own self interest. — anthony 2nd, 11:34 PM (0/0)
You are boring with your false (and anonymous) statements — fabrcop, 9:59 AM (0/0)
Sir, you have a right to post here, but not to distort the facts... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sat 11:38 PM (0/0)
Say YES! to IOD — first1, Sat 11:05 PM (0/0)
We all? How many Jim Smith's are you? (poor guy...) — Rebeka, Sat 8:45 PM (0/0)
These allegations are, of course, false — cambler, Sat 8:12 PM (0/0)

Neustar/Melbourne IT/Afilias ... Larry, Moe, & Curly — dcorish, Sat 2:39 PM (1/1)

Who wins? NSI — west coast, Sun 1:20 AM (0/0)

ICANN: Please correct *NEW* errors before nov 5 — Saskia, Sat 1:07 PM (0/0)
Basic features of the ideal application — Rgaetano, Sat 9:43 AM (0/0)
Afilias Whistle Blower — west coast, Sat 8:01 AM (1/1)

Names? — west coast, Sat 8:20 AM (0/0)

ICANN: You mentioned "fairness" and the "consumer" on your website...I would like to comment... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Sat 7:59 AM (1/1)

Mr Krajewski's Post is Excellent — jtrade, Sat 8:52 AM (0/0)

Limitation needed — martin@communards.de, Sat 1:43 AM (1/1)

New gtlds are the better solution — friedrich, Sat 10:03 AM (0/0)

A Sunrise Period is Wrong and Unfair — Merlin, Sat 1:36 AM (1/1)

I strongly support this excellent comment. — friedrich, Sat 10:50 AM (0/0)

co-op.com — kimc, Sat 12:51 AM (0/0)
General Policy Statement of Registry Selection — Frank Mount, Fri 9:34 PM (0/0)
REGLAND >>> " L I A R S " Never mentioned by ICANN on "Pre-registrations" — AdvantaTel, Fri 9:29 PM (0/0)
.SHOP to Name.Space, .WEB to IOD, .INFO to Afilias, .SITE to Neustar — netizen1, Fri 8:45 PM (0/0)
American Civil Liberties Union comments on ICANN TLD application process — cchiu, Fri 8:40 PM (1/2)

2nd major objection for sunrise provisions — huguesdb, Fri 11:36 PM (1/1)

The 1st one wasabout the fact that addresses cannot violate trademarks. Domain names ARE addresses! — friedrich, Fri 11:54 PM (0/0)

NeuStar LNP Help Desk — chagan, Fri 8:19 PM (0/0)
YES to .YP - YES TO NEW UNIVERSAL, EFFICIENT and EASY TO USE gTLD's. — Juan Pablo Calvo, Fri 8:09 PM (0/0)
New TLDs — John Lewis, Fri 7:50 PM (0/0)
Trademarks can be protected WITHOUT a Sunrise Period! (New TLDs are needed SOON) — fabrcop, Fri 7:13 PM (0/0)
Strong Vote for .i — rgupta, Fri 6:31 PM (0/0)
Inadequate selection — Tim Brown, Fri 6:15 PM (0/0)
.web doesn't solve the problem — tomam, Fri 5:53 PM (2/4)

Good for .web — friedrich, Sat 12:07 AM (1/2)

Well, confusion for one — huguesdb, Sat 12:22 AM (1/1)

Well, I am from Switzerland, too. — friedrich, Sat 10:09 PM (0/0)

competition: after all, that IS one of ICANN's objectives — stuart, Fri 6:36 PM (0/0)

Thought Provoking — cyber-cynic, Fri 5:12 PM (3/8)

come on... — huguesdb, Fri 11:28 PM (0/0)
Answer — cambler, Fri 9:15 PM (1/5)

I love them apples. — cyber-cynic, Fri 10:16 PM (1/4)

Answer — cambler, Fri 10:34 PM (1/3)

Who is asking who — cyber-cynic, Fri 11:33 PM (2/2)

Why??? — huguesdb, Fri 11:59 PM (0/0)
Answer — cambler, Fri 11:58 PM (0/0)

Was .WS (WorldSite) Accredited When They First Sold Registrations? — pilot3, Fri 6:10 PM (0/0)

TLD preregistration SCAM or what — davidnrn, Fri 1:58 PM (1/1)

Regland vs ICANN — PHXbird, Fri 3:11 PM (0/0)

Scrap NSI entirely. Their human interface is dead. — davidnrn, Fri 1:44 PM (0/0)
ICANN: Please correct errors before nov 5 — saskia, Fri 1:04 PM (0/0)
ICANN Testifying before Congress about many Issues - ON RECORD.... 7/99 — Gregory W. Krajewski, Fri 6:33 AM (0/0)
This whole procedure needs reviewing — gt515, Fri 1:31 AM (0/0)
Avoiding Conflicts of Interest - At last!!! — Anthony 2nd, Fri 12:03 AM (1/1)

Maybe.. — huguesdb, Sat 12:25 AM (0/0)

Why No TRADEMARK domain???? — Jello, Thu 10:35 PM (4/4)

Why no .Tm domain? — jweb, 2:57 PM (0/0)
You are right Jeffrey, but obviously ... power is wanted, not justice! — friedrich, Sat 11:00 AM (0/0)
.TMK — shayne, Sat 6:24 AM (0/0)
Lots of Merit — cyber-cynic, Fri 5:10 AM (0/0)

PCIA Comments on Applications Received by ICANN for Operating New TLDs — PCIA, Thu 9:19 PM (1/1)

ICANN: The Sunrise Proposal, is like the TAX issue on the net - Let the system grow first! — Gregory W. Krajewski, Fri 5:54 AM (0/0)

.fam TLD — beetle, Thu 5:38 PM (0/0)
CONTRADICTIONS in IPC's comment about IOD/.web application! — fabrcop, Thu 1:17 PM (0/0)
To C.Ambler, IOD: why $15? — IODskeptic, Thu 9:32 AM (4/11)

Glowing Financials — cyber-cynic, Fri 12:16 AM (1/1)

Since when does a company have to lose money? — huguesdb, Sat 12:38 AM (0/0)

a reply — jeffrey, Fri 12:07 AM (0/0)
Glowining Financials — cyber-cynic, Thu 11:58 PM (2/4)

Response — cambler, Fri 12:22 AM (1/2)

No Insunuation — cyber-cynic, Fri 12:29 AM (1/1)

Financials are posted — cambler, Fri 12:38 AM (0/0)

Other numbers — For The People, Fri 12:15 AM (0/0)

Fees — cambler, Thu 9:54 PM (1/2)

Registry fee, redux — David Coombs, Fri 12:03 AM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, Fri 12:32 AM (0/0)

Nov 1 Status Update — VikashPatel, Thu 7:10 AM (0/0)
Neustar/MelbourneIT is Either Lying or it's Application is Flawed! — jtrade, Thu 6:26 AM (0/0)
Grant .WEB to IODesign // Grant .INFO to Afilias — worldwide, Thu 6:16 AM (0/0)
.MAG would be a good TLD for online MAGAZINES — DRrandy, Thu 6:09 AM (0/0)
Nobody will trust a referee siding with .. — cello, Thu 5:27 AM (0/0)
CORE application is good for everyone — Ksoussi, Thu 1:05 AM (0/0)
Desiderata for new TLDs — mc, Thu 12:24 AM (0/0)
Support "dot co-op" — idi1, Wed 6:26 PM (0/0)
Numeric domain names — Gervas, Wed 5:01 PM (0/0)
ICANN is Not in the business for TM protection.....It's all about the technical aspects of the DNS — Gregory W. Krajewski, Wed 4:31 PM (1/1)

IP Evaluation ...A Job Well Done !! — TLD Facts, Wed 6:20 PM (0/0)

IPC preliminary evaluation of new TLD applications — SJMetalitz, Wed 3:53 PM (5/7)

IATA Reply to IPC preliminary evaluation of new TLD applications — IATA.travel Team, Fri 9:47 PM (0/0)
It's clear why the IPC report should read "preliminary" — jeffrey, Wed 11:21 PM (1/1)

Because Maybe The Report Is Rigged — pilot3, Wed 11:53 PM (0/0)

Is The IPC Hypocritical? — jtrade, Wed 9:52 PM (0/0)
IPC Evaluation To Be Taken With A Grain Of Salt, In All Fairness. — pilot3, Wed 8:58 PM (0/0)
Open Note to the IPC.......The truth about your report — Gregory W. Krajewski, Wed 5:26 PM (1/1)

IPC's Level of involvement in the TLD process........How much is too much??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, Thu 2:40 AM (0/0)

GREAT COMPANY — ManyStores, Wed 3:16 PM (0/0)
support .museum — CAA, Wed 3:13 PM (0/0)
GREAT COMPANY — ManyStores, Wed 3:07 PM (0/0)
Moral rights — fabrcop, Wed 1:59 PM (0/0)
NO to IATA/TLD — jie, Wed 1:57 PM (0/0)
What's That Foul Smell? — jtrade, Wed 9:41 AM (0/0)
The perfect choice is: IOD/.web , Afilias/.info , Neustar/.site — fabrcop, Wed 9:04 AM (0/0)
The internet should be a utility — mayor, Wed 6:14 AM (0/0)
Who got it right - in absolute numbers — pedro, Wed 4:11 AM (1/1)

YOU FORGOT ONE — Sarah, Thu 3:43 PM (0/0)

MSNBC poll - who got it right — pedro, Wed 3:58 AM (0/0)
.Web, MelbourneIT/Neustar,ICANN Director Greg Crew and Conflict of Interest? — jtrade, Wed 2:17 AM (1/1)

For the record: — Anthony 2nd, Thu 3:39 AM (0/0)

.WEB to IOD and .SHOP to Name.Space — netizen1, Tue 10:42 PM (0/0)
Better format for this board! — ville, Tue 10:15 PM (0/0)
.health TLD — LMS, Tue 9:16 PM (0/0)
Parallel root server with separate database — PHXbird, Tue 9:13 PM (0/0)
All applications should be returned. — If-I-can-why-can't-ICANN., Tue 8:59 PM (0/0)
support .co-op domain — mnfc, Tue 2:54 PM (0/0)
support for .museum — taieve, Tue 8:57 AM (0/0)
Are we all missing the point? — cyber-cynic, Tue 7:22 AM (4/9)

Nice... — huguesdb, Tue 11:08 PM (1/4)

Don't rock the boat. — cyber-cynic, Wed 12:45 AM (1/3)

Are you proposing to do this??? — huguesdb, Wed 11:00 PM (1/2)

Petition — cyber-cynic, Thu 3:29 AM (1/1)

Can you e-mail me? — huguesdb, Sat 6:38 PM (0/0)

Actually IOD should charge registrars less than $15 — fabrcop, Tue 12:36 AM (1/1)

This sounds very reasonable — netizen1, Tue 11:02 PM (0/0)

Very interesting! — friedrich, Tue 10:14 AM (0/0)
A very good start — cambler, Tue 7:44 AM (0/0)

Almostly can't wait..... — herrieta, Tue 5:34 AM (0/0)
support mumber .tel — emily, Tue 4:54 AM (0/0)
support NUMBER.tel — philiptsai, Tue 4:43 AM (0/0)
New TLDs---->.tel is execellent! — philiptsai, Tue 4:23 AM (0/0)
Cheapest Wins — YellowMello, Tue 3:42 AM (1/1)

Military — World Thoughts, Wed 12:52 AM (0/0)

Another Law suit? — cyber-cynic, Tue 12:05 AM (2/15)

Mr. Ambler is contradictory here ! — global view, Tue 12:15 AM (1/11)

Answer — cambler, Tue 8:46 PM (1/10)

Objectivity is better than sarcasm — cyber-cynic, Wed 12:05 AM (2/9)

Answer — cambler, Wed 1:53 AM (1/7)

Just curiosity — cyber-cynic, Wed 3:32 AM (1/6)

Answers — cambler, Wed 4:03 AM (2/5)

To register or to pre-register ... — cyber-cynic, Wed 7:27 PM (1/2)

Question — cambler, Wed 8:32 PM (1/1)

oops — cyber-cynic, Thu 4:25 AM (0/0)

Business Risks....IOD is correct in how they wrote about them in their application — Gregory W. Krajewski, Wed 4:18 AM (1/1)

Also keep in mind Cyber-Cynic...Remember New TLD's haven't come out in how long??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, Wed 4:43 AM (0/0)

Well. . . — World Thoughts, Wed 12:47 AM (0/0)

Expect replies — cambler, Tue 1:31 AM (1/2)

I must have missed something — cyber-cynic, Tue 8:24 AM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, Tue 8:36 AM (0/0)

ICANN: listen to this suggestion and be appreciated all over the world — fabrcop, Mon 9:16 PM (0/0)
Support .health domain — eohtlg, Mon 7:09 PM (0/0)
MAIN CONCERN: commercialization and monopolization — gilles, Mon 5:53 PM (0/0)
Is ICANN pulling a fast one? — Anthony 2nd, Mon 11:19 AM (0/0)
after much research — dandb, Mon 4:36 AM (1/1)

Yes! Generic Internet users see that .web=IOD (even though they did not register a IOD/.web domain) — fabrcop, Mon 10:11 AM (0/0)

No new generic unrestricted TLDs PLEASE — huguesdb, October 29 @ 10:41 PM (3/23)

Very few are really generic — SayNoToIOD, Mon 3:18 AM (2/3)

Why "SayNo" is wrong.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Mon 4:00 AM (0/0)
I see — cambler, Mon 3:30 AM (1/1)

Exactly the opposite — SayNoToIOD, Mon 4:03 AM (0/0)

Country Code Abuse — jeffrey, Mon 3:11 AM (1/1)

It depends — huguesdb, Tue 12:07 AM (0/0)

Yes, generics - no, artificial scarcity — cambler, October 29 @ 11:03 PM (1/16)

Yes if there are many generics.... — huguesdb, October 30 @ 1:18 AM (5/15)

Should Apple.Whatever Be Held Only For Apple Computer? No Way! — pilot2, Mon 2:17 PM (1/1)

Did I say it was WRONG?? — huguesdb, Mon 10:45 PM (0/0)

generic or not - what thinks internet users about new names — ted, Mon 7:21 AM (1/3)

Interesting — huguesdb, Mon 11:05 PM (1/2)

Interesting????? — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 3:32 AM (1/1)

Interesting!!! — huguesdb, Wed 12:50 AM (0/0)

Reply — cambler, Mon 2:26 AM (0/0)
We need a universal TLD (promotes global acceptance and usage!!) — Gregory W. Krajewski, Mon 2:25 AM (1/1)

Slowly... — huguesdb, Tue 12:38 AM (0/0)

Think about it again, please. — friedrich, Mon 2:23 AM (1/5)

Thinking again... — huguesdb, Tue 1:22 AM (3/4)

I hope you can understand now, how important the introduction of new gtlds is! — friedrich, Sat 10:35 PM (0/0)
Dot Web will cure the problem.....Here is why..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 2:18 AM (0/0)
What risk? — cambler, Tue 1:34 AM (1/1)

risk.... — huguesdb, Wed 12:35 AM (0/0)

Why not ONE dot ALT TLD? — itsjpr, October 29 @ 7:25 PM (1/1)

May you explain it to me again. Thank you! — friedrich, October 29 @ 11:03 PM (0/0)

What do you think? — VikashPatel, October 29 @ 3:35 PM (0/0)
Top Domain Name Holders — Merlin, October 29 @ 6:34 AM (1/1)

Network Solution (a.ka Great Domains), Register.com (a.k.a Afternic.com) — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 29 @ 3:37 PM (0/0)

Messages From The Past (Just A Stroll Down Archive Lane) — Mario, October 29 @ 6:22 AM (0/0)
Health as a TLD — pschloeffel, October 29 @ 2:51 AM (1/1)

Health — nendo, Tue 7:35 PM (0/0)

A "fresh" .web database is the only fair approach. — CyberCitizen, October 28 @ 11:36 PM (5/5)

If you are right, then a fresh ".com" database is fair also — fabrcop, Mon 10:01 AM (0/0)
There were more students around at that time - do you want to punish them now for being innovative? — friedrich, October 29 @ 8:42 AM (0/0)
CyberCitizen: Do You Know What A "Schnorer" Is? — pilot2, October 29 @ 5:55 AM (0/0)
Snooze — Merlin, October 29 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)
So. . . — World Thoughts, October 29 @ 12:12 AM (0/0)

Image Online Design must run .web — johnnie, October 28 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)
IATA — barmar, October 28 @ 4:10 PM (0/0)
we support the trade union proposal — rousselot, October 28 @ 11:38 AM (0/0)
Multilingual TLD (¤¤¤å.com) — dannyd@post.com, October 28 @ 8:43 AM (1/1)

Multilingual .COM must be stopped! — sooboklee, Thu 3:10 AM (0/0)

.co-op — andrewmoore, October 28 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)
One thing for sure....Dot Com needs competition......Dot Web is the answer — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 28 @ 4:31 AM (0/0)
Please read for yourself why there is so much Anti-Afilias, Neustar sentiment on this board — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 28 @ 4:08 AM (1/1)

Judging from ICANNs recent reactions, I guess they will not tolerate such behaviour. — friedrich, October 28 @ 9:01 AM (0/0)

level of conversation — Ville, October 27 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)
"Beware the ICANN Board Squatter" — jtrade, October 27 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD support — Arnold Oliver, October 27 @ 5:47 PM (2/2)

.co-op support — IDC, Fri 11:11 PM (0/0)
co-op support — brentstubstad, October 27 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)

Oppose IATA as travel domain provider — DBToursInt, October 27 @ 5:45 PM (1/1)

Oppose IATA — DBToursInt, October 28 @ 1:43 AM (0/0)

.co-op support — Deborah, October 27 @ 5:17 PM (0/0)
Dot Museum As Top Level Domain Name — Oregon Heritage Commission, October 27 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)
If We Post About Stubbs, Do We Post Under Afilias? Neustar? Core? Others? — pilot2, October 27 @ 1:19 PM (0/0)
CAE's support of IATA proposal to sponsor a ".travel" TLD — isaacs, October 27 @ 11:07 AM (0/0)
.HEALTH and WHO — chriz, October 27 @ 10:54 AM (0/0)
.kids tld - general observations — john.carr, October 27 @ 9:09 AM (2/2)

.kids application — jeffrey, October 28 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
.kids TLD — Neo, October 27 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)

Network Solutions and Great Domains....Register.com and Afternic.com...hmmm — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 27 @ 2:08 AM (1/1)

Additional Information — Mario, October 27 @ 2:47 PM (0/0)

Going Offline — cambler, October 27 @ 2:03 AM (1/1)

no silence to be expected — friedrich, October 27 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)

Supporting new domain name ".co-op" — San Luis Valley R.E.C., October 26 @ 10:53 PM (0/0)
*****DIRECT QUESTIONS TO KEN STUBBS***** — Monty, October 26 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)
Afilias get .web and IOD supporters get their (pre)-Registrations — Rebeka, October 26 @ 10:20 PM (1/2)

This is not correct. I completely disagree — cgrady, October 27 @ 1:11 AM (1/1)

Point well taken! — cello, October 27 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)

IATA support — Haymaker, October 26 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
ICANN: please post other documents about IOD/.web also (in the correspondence) — fabrcop, October 26 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)
Msnbc-Meeks-Icann — Webster, October 26 @ 5:58 PM (4/17)

Dave Crocker? Who's next, Bozo the clown? — lapointe, October 27 @ 1:23 PM (0/0)
The content of this post can't be tolerated! — fabrcop, October 27 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
Who Made You God? — enforcer, October 26 @ 10:18 PM (0/0)
Pretty Weak — pilot2, October 26 @ 6:29 PM (1/13)

NeuStar paid for it — cambler, October 26 @ 7:30 PM (2/12)

Mr Ambler is a basher — wiredz, October 27 @ 12:40 AM (4/4)

WiredZ...why didn't you say you were from OpenSRS... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 3:51 AM (0/0)
You call that "bashing"? — World Thoughts, October 28 @ 11:26 AM (0/0)
You do no fo favour to Afilias / Neustar! — friedrich, October 27 @ 2:23 PM (0/0)
Ahh, the truth. Eugene Kang=Dave Crocker! — lapointe, October 27 @ 1:26 PM (0/0)

Mr Ambler's distortions — Global View, October 26 @ 7:50 PM (1/6)

Please check your facts — cambler, October 26 @ 8:35 PM (1/5)

Here's an issue for you Mr. Ambler — Global View, October 26 @ 8:56 PM (1/4)

Answer, and a question for you, too — cambler, October 26 @ 9:43 PM (1/3)

Comment Area Creditability ? Look at these numbers ! — Global View, October 26 @ 11:56 PM (2/2)

Oh no, not Global View....He has not made a single point in over 129 posts.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 27 @ 12:52 AM (0/0)
Answer my question, please — cambler, October 27 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs (Daily News-Nov. 07/99) — shawn, October 26 @ 5:44 PM (2/3)

Ken Stubbs Personal Reply: — shawn, October 26 @ 9:41 PM (1/1)

Interesting, indeed — cambler, October 26 @ 9:47 PM (0/0)

Interesting — saskia, October 26 @ 9:15 PM (0/0)

ZDNet Highlights The MSNBC Article! The Link Is In This Post. — pilot2, October 26 @ 4:33 PM (0/0)
IATA .travel TLD Application — ADP, October 26 @ 2:47 PM (0/0)
The Real Numbers (The Commentary Process Is being PEVERTED) — Global View, October 26 @ 1:15 PM (3/4)

1 of 16 — saskia, October 26 @ 9:34 PM (1/1)

15 of 16 — saskia, October 26 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)

The Real Numbers (Global View) — shawn, October 26 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)
So IOD Supporters Have "Dissuaded" Afilias Participation Herein? — pilot2, October 26 @ 2:41 PM (0/0)

TO ICANN board members, staff, and applicants.........WHERE ARE YOU???? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 4:27 AM (1/1)

:-) :-( — Mario, October 26 @ 5:02 AM (0/0)

.SEX, .XXX, .KIDS TLDs Provide a Freedom of Choice - reply to Ron 1000 — lrfarny, October 26 @ 2:42 AM (1/2)

.xxx, .sex, .kids — JanHuffman, Thu 4:46 PM (1/1)

Transition period to .xxx — JanHuffman, Fri 9:12 PM (0/0)

request for our trademark - answer from NSI - should we now go to whois GD — ted, October 26 @ 1:26 AM (0/0)
Monopoly gets bigger! — first1, October 26 @ 12:50 AM (0/0)
Ken Stubbs condems NSI but Afilias makes the same mistakes! — anthony, October 25 @ 11:47 PM (0/0)
It occurs to me. — World Thoughts, October 25 @ 11:38 PM (0/0)
NSI/Verisign Buys GreatDomains.com — jtrade, October 25 @ 11:33 PM (1/1)

Not Much Of A Surprise To Me! Its Called Vertical Integration! — Mario, October 26 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)

ICANN IS NOT DEMOCRATIC - President Ether Dyson — ted, October 25 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)
domain name ".co-op" — tech, October 25 @ 9:17 PM (1/1)

.co-op — ldavis, October 26 @ 3:21 PM (0/0)

How about pioneer preference? — Jeffrey, October 25 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)
MODERATOR! -- Display messages from: 1 day ago etc. -- doesn't work. — Rebeka, October 25 @ 6:17 PM (1/2)

mail from NSI - request for our trademark - maybe we find it in the near future in the domainauction — ted, October 26 @ 12:22 AM (1/1)

Ted, Consider Reposting At Top Of This Section. You'll Attract More Readers. Thanks. — Mario, October 26 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)

ICANN = NSI? where's the competition? — sboisvert, October 25 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
undue influence — arturo, October 25 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
New Domain Name ".co-op" — Tricounty, October 25 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)
To C.Ambler, IOD: QUESTION — IODskeptic, October 25 @ 1:15 PM (0/0)
Dump the dots. — jackb_guppy, October 25 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)

Funding the system — Ville, October 25 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)

why .dip ? — dargento, October 25 @ 10:52 AM (0/0)
New Registration of eTLD to compliment gTLD and ccTLD available — boris7, October 25 @ 8:13 AM (0/0)
".tel" — Nicole, October 25 @ 5:30 AM (2/3)

.tel LLC — CPD, October 29 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)
the ".tel"s — Peek,David, October 25 @ 3:06 PM (1/1)

More Clarification May be Helpful — leann, October 25 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)

MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:41 AM (2/2)

Brock Meeks: American Hero — vdfman, October 25 @ 3:20 PM (0/0)
Very interesting and important article!!! — fabrcop, October 25 @ 2:01 PM (0/0)

Comments Period Must be Extended Even Longer! — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:32 AM (1/2)

I disagree! — fabrcop, October 25 @ 1:50 PM (1/1)

According to the MSNBC article... — VikashPatel, October 25 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)

Voting on New Tld Applications — jtrade, October 24 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)
Following the rules — TheWatcher, October 24 @ 7:15 PM (1/2)

Indeed — WorldThoughts, October 24 @ 7:36 PM (1/1)

Point Well Taken — CrossFire, October 24 @ 7:50 PM (0/0)

As I Promised-Question For Chris Ambler — CrossFire, October 24 @ 4:57 PM (1/4)

Answer — cambler, October 24 @ 5:51 PM (1/3)

Followup Question — CrossFire, October 24 @ 6:03 PM (2/2)

What It Means — pilot2, October 24 @ 9:39 PM (0/0)
Answer — cambler, October 24 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)

Choosing wisely — concerned, October 24 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)
MODERATOR Please HELP!!!!! Forum open for comments until Sunday, 5 November 2000. — Rebeka, October 24 @ 3:59 PM (1/1)

The structure of this message board is shocking. — boris7, October 25 @ 10:17 AM (0/0)

.co-op — Marlu Lake, October 24 @ 3:24 PM (1/1)

Comments — Phxbird, October 24 @ 6:13 PM (0/0)

proposal for handling trademark and conflicting .web registrations — pvos, October 24 @ 2:43 PM (2/2)

One BIG fallacy — jandl, October 27 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
What you say is already in IOD's application! — fabrcop, October 25 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)

Followup Message For Pilot — CrossFire, October 24 @ 8:09 AM (2/7)

"Bad Faith" Registrations — pilot2, October 24 @ 12:45 AM (1/1)

Pilot2-I Would Like To Thank You As Well For Clarifying This Matter. It Really Helps. — CrossFire, October 24 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)

Here is how IOD will handle "bad faith" registrations.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 24 @ 12:00 AM (1/4)

Everyone-Please Read The Above Message. It Is Excellent!!! — CrossFire, October 24 @ 3:50 PM (1/3)

Answer — cambler, October 24 @ 6:49 PM (1/2)

Please Let Me Explain — CrossFire, October 24 @ 7:19 PM (1/1)

Answer — cambler, October 24 @ 7:58 PM (0/0)

DNSO - Noncommerical Constituency Proposal....Any Comments on their ideas — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 24 @ 5:01 AM (2/3)

Follow up to DNSO - with regards to IOD application — pvos, October 24 @ 2:12 PM (0/0)
Great Find — Merlin, October 24 @ 5:49 AM (1/1)

I agree — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 24 @ 12:05 AM (0/0)

inane multiple posting — dansokol, October 24 @ 4:54 AM (0/0)
The world is watching....A spirit of "openness" and cooperation needs to exist...Success will result — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 24 @ 4:23 AM (0/0)
Where is the Competition? — jtrade, October 24 @ 1:58 AM (1/2)

The competition is here if you look — marshm, October 24 @ 4:39 AM (1/1)

Gene is right — cambler, October 24 @ 8:04 AM (0/0)

Where's the Competition? — jtrade, October 24 @ 1:37 AM (0/0)
New proof of concept?? -- ICM and Blueberry hill — brahim_m, October 24 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
IOD and Ken Stubbs — Merlin, October 24 @ 12:16 AM (1/1)

Actually this strange post by ICANN may confuse people — fabrcop, October 24 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)

.SHARE victim of a $50,000 application fee — domainSHARE.com, October 23 @ 10:49 PM (0/0)
ICANN - please correct the dead link — friedrich, October 23 @ 10:25 PM (1/1)

"General Comments" access — PHXbird, October 24 @ 2:36 PM (0/0)

NSI Cybersquatting — jtrade, October 23 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)
.WS Claims .WEB Is Unfair. Read .WS E-Mail Exchange With ICANN — pilot2, October 23 @ 9:56 PM (2/5)

They are insane. — For The People, October 23 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)
VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO THIS FORUM! ... PLEASE IDENTIFY! — friedrich, October 23 @ 10:47 PM (1/3)

Reply To Friedrich Regarding .WS — pilot2, October 23 @ 11:08 PM (1/2)

You are right — friedrich, October 24 @ 12:10 AM (1/1)

Reply To Friedrich — pilot2, October 24 @ 12:33 AM (0/0)

Apoyamos la creación de dominio para Cooperativas — ronaldag, October 23 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
Support for .DIR TLD — cstone, October 23 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
.co-op — shanel, October 23 @ 6:10 PM (2/3)

Comments — Phxbird, October 24 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)
co-op — lbbrady, October 23 @ 8:19 PM (1/1)

Comments — Phxbird, October 24 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)

Article Touching On Lawsuit Involving NSI And Anti-Trust Matters — CrossFire, October 23 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
A Solicitation For Readers & Feedback — CrossFire, October 23 @ 5:43 PM (3/6)

Interesting... — fabrcop, October 23 @ 7:55 PM (1/1)

fabrcop — CrossFire, October 23 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)

Response T "...Solicitation..." By Crossfire — pilot, October 23 @ 6:29 PM (1/1)

Thank You For A Well Thoughtout Reponse-Here's Mine As Well (Re-posted) — CrossFire, October 23 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)

No Go — Merlin, October 23 @ 6:28 PM (1/1)

Thank You For Responding — CrossFire, October 23 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)

The truth about .web (short version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:28 PM (0/0)
The truth about .web (long version) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)
coop suffix (TLD) name — mikeb, October 23 @ 1:03 PM (1/3)

.co-op top-level domain — sgripka, October 23 @ 6:57 PM (2/2)

Comments — PHXbird, October 24 @ 6:17 PM (0/0)
.co-op — mark levin, October 24 @ 12:13 AM (0/0)

.co-op TLD — mcremc, October 23 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
$2,500,000 Offer to ICANN — julie, October 23 @ 7:36 AM (1/2)

My reply to your comment, Julie — wiredz, October 27 @ 3:45 PM (1/1)

Wake Up WiredZ — julie, October 28 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)

"General Comments" thread by clicking here — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)
MODERATOR-PLEASE MANAGE THE BULLETIN BOARD MORE EFFECTIVELY. PUT MOST ACTIVE SECTIONS AT TOP!!! — Facilitator, October 22 @ 7:41 PM (1/3)

GIve up your role as "facilitator" — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 7:48 PM (1/2)

Give Up Your Role As Referee. — Mario, October 22 @ 8:42 PM (1/1)

Hardly — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)

A note about wiredz... — marshm, October 22 @ 4:19 PM (2/2)

Gene Marsh Comments About Me Are PURE LIES! — wiredz, October 26 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)
marshm Post About "WIREDZ" A Must See For All, Including ICANN — pilot, October 22 @ 5:24 PM (0/0)

The Public HATES Network Solutions — Merlin, October 22 @ 4:49 AM (1/3)

ICANN Double Standard — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 6:39 AM (1/2)

NSI Registry/ Compromise of data integrity — Ray, October 22 @ 1:08 PM (1/1)

NSI Hoarding Domain Names - NSI is ICANN's only real power here — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 3:39 PM (0/0)

New Afilias Site — global view, October 21 @ 11:34 PM (6/12)

what site? — vdfman, October 23 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)
new afilias site — joinin, October 22 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)
New Afilias Site — pilot, October 21 @ 11:48 PM (1/3)

What did your really buy here ? — global view, October 21 @ 11:58 PM (1/2)

Your opinion — Merlin, October 22 @ 12:09 AM (1/1)

I am proud to be an Afilias Supporter — wiredz, October 26 @ 11:15 AM (0/0)

Apparently you never heard of. . . — For The People, October 21 @ 11:44 PM (1/1)

More stuff — For The People, October 21 @ 11:58 PM (0/0)

Your not fooling anyone "global".....Immaturity is reflected on those stealth posters... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 21 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
Spare us — Merlin, October 21 @ 11:41 PM (1/2)

Our man merlin — global view, October 21 @ 11:45 PM (1/1)

Who's "us"? — Merlin, October 21 @ 11:51 PM (0/0)

trademarks and preregistration - through IOD or others — ted, October 21 @ 8:58 PM (0/0)
Remember Citizens Band Radio - CB Radio — ALLDNS, October 21 @ 6:34 PM (2/5)

CB radio? — anthony, October 22 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)
CB Radio = Bad Analogy — pilot, October 21 @ 7:07 PM (1/3)

Why is CB Radio not a good analogy? — ALLDNS, October 21 @ 8:22 PM (1/2)

There is NO similarity — marshm, October 21 @ 8:46 PM (1/1)

A similarity is licensing — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 2:58 AM (0/0)

IOD is not fit to operate Registry — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:40 PM (7/7)

IOD is just as capable as any other company — cgrady, Tue 7:39 PM (0/0)
IOD Has all of these — cambler, October 22 @ 4:15 AM (0/0)
SayNoToIOD-Given Your Expertise, Can You Provide A Detailed Analysis To Back Your Conclusion??? — Facilitator, October 22 @ 1:54 AM (0/0)
SayNoToIOD-Or Are You Smokin Wacki Tobacci? — Facilitator, October 22 @ 1:53 AM (0/0)
IOD has been a STABLE registry for the last 4 years — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 21 @ 11:58 PM (0/0)
I support IOD — Merlin, October 21 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)
Prove your statements — Hudgens, October 21 @ 11:04 PM (0/0)

Drop .web !!! Be creative !!! — Say_No_To_Afilias, October 21 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)
IOD Registrations wiped out - they were only for showing support. — Al Gore, October 21 @ 1:33 PM (3/9)

You might face legal problems — friedrich, October 23 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)
Then clear .com either... (Including pre-registrations taken in 1993) — fabrcop, October 23 @ 8:50 AM (0/0)
What does that solve? — Hudgens, October 21 @ 3:05 PM (2/6)

go to work — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
Namespace — Al Gore, October 21 @ 3:36 PM (3/4)

To answer a couple of your questions... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 1:37 PM (0/0)
Oh, we're back to that question again. — For The People, October 21 @ 4:03 PM (0/0)
Pre-registration — Hudgens, October 21 @ 3:45 PM (1/1)

AlGore.Web is taken by Kim Leonberger... — Al Gore, October 21 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)

What TLD's Should I be looking to register? — gonzo1977, October 21 @ 9:37 AM (1/1)

Registering New TLD's — Hudgens, October 21 @ 3:18 PM (0/0)

INFORMATION REGARDING THE FOCI PETITION — TheScribe, October 21 @ 8:18 AM (8/9)

Marc Brittan - I Fully Support the FOCI Petitiion — mbrittan, October 21 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
Gregory W. Krajewski – I Fully Support The FOCI Petition — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 21 @ 5:20 PM (0/0)
I do support it with 1 condition — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 4:37 PM (1/1)

Why? — For The People, October 21 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)

Steve Arnold-I fully support the FOCI petition — first1, October 21 @ 3:49 PM (0/0)
Friedrich Kisters - I Fully Support The FOCI Petition — friedrich, October 21 @ 8:46 AM (0/0)
Albert Marshall – I Fully Support The FOCI Petition — 3, October 21 @ 8:40 AM (0/0)
Mariam Marshall – I Fully Support The FOCI Petition — 2, October 21 @ 8:39 AM (0/0)
Raymond Marshall – I Fully Support The FOCI Petition — 1, October 21 @ 8:21 AM (0/0)

US Centric TLD - again! — gpine, October 21 @ 8:14 AM (3/8)

Dot web+Global Registrant Voters=IOD — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 21 @ 11:36 PM (0/0)
Why bother? — Say_No_To_Afilias, October 21 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
Us Centric Huh!!! It's the Worldwide web — Merlin, October 21 @ 9:45 AM (1/5)

Yes - US Centric — gpine, October 21 @ 10:41 AM (1/4)

Be honest — cello, October 21 @ 11:21 AM (1/3)

That's not the point — gpine, October 21 @ 1:35 PM (2/2)

Trademarks — Merlin, October 21 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
IOD and Trademarks. — For The People, October 21 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)

ICANN & IOD — Merlin, October 21 @ 7:00 AM (2/7)

council warning of pre registrations — first1, October 21 @ 3:27 PM (3/5)

first1, Save That E-Mail ! — pilot, October 21 @ 5:52 PM (1/2)

That warning came from the Names Council. As such. . . — For The People, October 21 @ 5:56 PM (1/1)

Sept. 29 Warning By DNSO — pilot, October 21 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)

Like Merlin Stated In A Previous Message. Ken Is Out To Ambush The Spirit Of The Process. — Facilitator, October 21 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)
Questionable actions — Hudgens, October 21 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)

Total Agreement — Hudgens, October 21 @ 3:26 PM (0/0)

Just say NO to self proclaimed Registries — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 5:47 AM (8/13)

cavemara — cgrady, Tue 8:07 PM (0/0)
You should examine your facts before posing a message. — Hudgens, October 21 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
Self-proclaimed??! IANA did authorize IOD in 1996 — fabrcop, October 21 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
Say NO to "SayNoToIOD" — multilinks, October 21 @ 9:10 AM (1/1)

panic — Ray, October 21 @ 12:06 AM (0/0)

ONLY legitimate register of .webTLD has been IOD since 1996 — ian-francis-xavier, October 21 @ 9:06 AM (0/0)
How many "Jim Smith" are in this forum? — friedrich, October 21 @ 9:02 AM (0/0)
.web for you? Vested interests? — friedrich, October 21 @ 8:58 AM (0/0)
Say Yes to IOD — Merlin, October 21 @ 6:32 AM (1/4)

the names.. merilin... the names... — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 6:48 AM (3/3)

Post your property — PHXbird, October 21 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
Jim Smith? — Philosopher, October 21 @ 7:59 AM (0/0)
Why? — Philosopher, October 21 @ 6:55 AM (0/0)

Sherman & Clayton Antitrust Acts & Afilias — Merlin, October 21 @ 3:53 AM (1/1)

I agree — Say_No_To_Afilias, October 21 @ 6:03 AM (0/0)

About TLDs intended for Childrens applications (as .KIDS): Comments and Recommendations on Proposals — vany_martinez, October 21 @ 1:21 AM (1/1)

Correction of a word used in the previous posted message — vany_martinez, October 21 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)

My e-mail to Senator Boxer - for public review. — friedrich, October 21 @ 12:31 AM (1/4)

I'm sending a letter to Sen. Boxer too — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 6:19 AM (2/3)

Please Do Send Your Letter To Senator Boxer — pilot, October 21 @ 11:28 AM (1/1)

Your Absolutely Right! — Facilitator, October 21 @ 4:50 PM (0/0)

My second letter to Senator Boxer. — friedrich, October 21 @ 8:25 AM (0/0)

Let's Talk About NeuStar — Eliahu, October 20 @ 10:07 PM (2/11)

It goes deeper than "entrenched powers" — ElectricSmash, October 21 @ 2:20 AM (1/1)

If There's A Product On The Market You Don't Want, Then Don't Buy It! — pilot, October 21 @ 3:18 AM (0/0)

Yes, The Rats Are Roaming. Are You Interested In A Ballot??? — Facilitator, October 20 @ 10:13 PM (1/8)

Support — cambler, October 20 @ 10:27 PM (1/7)

Additional Comment — Facilitator, October 20 @ 10:46 PM (1/6)

We will post the FOCI petition here — tlilley, October 21 @ 1:36 AM (1/5)

Question? — Facilitator, October 21 @ 1:42 AM (1/4)

FOCI Petition — tlilley, October 21 @ 1:55 AM (1/3)

Question? — Facilitator, October 21 @ 2:02 AM (1/2)

I'm not sure what you're asking... — tlilley, October 21 @ 2:28 AM (1/1)

Reply — Facilitator, October 21 @ 2:38 AM (0/0)

Draft-Any Comments? Also, Need Catchy Title For Subject. — Facilitator, October 20 @ 10:03 PM (4/15)

one more thing — SayNoToIOD, October 21 @ 6:36 AM (4/4)

Reply — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)
<groan> — World Thoughts, October 22 @ 9:50 PM (0/0)
Are You Attempting Comic Relief? — Facilitator, October 22 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
Just lifting rocks — PHXbird, October 21 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)

Additional Thought For Interested Individuals — Facilitator, October 21 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
Revised Draft- Any Interest/Comments? I Will Go First If Yes, But Please Respond. Thanks! — Facilitator, October 21 @ 12:20 AM (3/7)

THANKYOU....how do we help ??? — ian-francis-xavier, October 21 @ 1:37 AM (1/1)

See Above. Currently Working Out Details As We Speak. Link Below. — Facilitator, October 21 @ 1:43 AM (0/0)

"core" infrastructure --> "CORE" the organization — PHXbird, October 21 @ 1:16 AM (1/3)

Recommendation? — Facilitator, October 21 @ 1:28 AM (1/2)

Re: Recommendations — PHXbird, October 21 @ 1:50 AM (1/1)

Please See Above — Facilitator, October 21 @ 2:04 AM (0/0)

P.S. - This Is Concerning A Ballot On This Bulletin Board For Media/Congress/Others To View — Facilitator, October 21 @ 12:25 AM (0/0)

My Comments On A Format For The Ballot — Facilitator, October 20 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)

JVTeam not only try to take .web from IOD they avoided paying ICANN its $50,000 — Anthony, October 20 @ 10:03 PM (1/2)

To be fair... — cambler, October 20 @ 10:06 PM (1/1)

Here are the links — Anthony, October 20 @ 11:01 PM (0/0)

Wanted: Ballot Indicating All Names Of Those Opposed To Afilias & Neustar — Facilitator, October 20 @ 9:57 PM (2/3)

Here is the petition — Infinity, October 20 @ 10:49 PM (1/1)

See Above Under "Draft-Any Comments? Also, Need Catchy Title For Subject" — Facilitator, October 20 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)

Do We Only Have Until Oct. 27 To Add Names To Ballot? — Facilitator, October 20 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)

What Date and Time Does This Board Close? — Infinity, October 20 @ 9:51 PM (2/3)

Nevermind. I have the answer. And here is the full schedule for the process.... — Infinity, October 20 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
Closing of forum — PHXbird, October 20 @ 9:55 PM (1/1)

LOL....you too, eh? — Infinity, October 20 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)

Wanted: Letter That Sums Events To Send To Congress & Agencies — Facilitator, October 20 @ 9:50 PM (2/10)

I will write the letter for Congress, and another for journalists. I was planning to do this anyway. — World Thoughts, October 20 @ 10:31 PM (2/7)

Thank You Very Much! Additional Idea. — Facilitator, October 20 @ 10:36 PM (1/2)

Ok — World Thoughts, October 20 @ 10:39 PM (1/1)

Additional Comment — Facilitator, October 21 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)

Hello Again — Merlin, October 20 @ 10:34 PM (1/3)

Thanks. : ) — World Thoughts, October 20 @ 10:36 PM (1/2)

Proposed statement — PHXbird, October 20 @ 11:06 PM (1/1)

LOL..... — World Thoughts, October 20 @ 11:23 PM (0/0)

Great idea — Merlin, October 20 @ 9:51 PM (1/1)

Merlin, Are You Willing To Write The Letter? — Facilitator, October 20 @ 9:59 PM (0/0)

Neustar/MelbourneIT and .Web — Merlin, October 20 @ 9:50 PM (0/0)
Some Names Council History — jtrade, October 20 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
Impeach Stubbs — Smart, October 20 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
senator@boxer.senate.gov = Barbara Boxer's E-Mail Address — pilot, October 20 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)
Vote 'No Confidence' in Ken Stubbs - please resign due to conflict of interest — JaseK, October 20 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)
Who are Local Congress People? — Smart, October 20 @ 7:57 PM (2/3)

Here's a great link to reps, etc. — PHXbird, October 20 @ 8:37 PM (0/0)
grassroots.com — Merlin, October 20 @ 8:21 PM (1/1)

Contacting reps — PHXbird, October 20 @ 8:40 PM (0/0)

Complain to California Attorney General — Smart, October 20 @ 7:39 PM (0/0)
Ken Stubbs is Laughing at YOU>>>>>> — whatsupdoc, October 20 @ 7:06 PM (2/5)

Ken's last laughing... - Auerbach and Mueller are ready to rumble ... — Rebeka, October 20 @ 7:28 PM (2/3)

Then Let's Give Them Ammunition To Support Our Cause. Consider The Ballot Initiative. Interested? — Facilitator, October 21 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)
Auerbach & Mueller — pilot, October 20 @ 7:33 PM (1/1)

Pilot, Check The Following Links Re: Additional Board Members Involvement — Facilitator, October 21 @ 1:25 AM (0/0)

Write Department of Justice — Smart, October 20 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)

Congress — Smart, October 20 @ 6:23 PM (1/3)

I Respect Your Position, But... — Facilitator, October 20 @ 6:34 PM (1/2)

Postings? — Smart, October 20 @ 6:54 PM (1/1)

I've Done That — Facilitator, October 20 @ 7:00 PM (0/0)

.WEB Registry — Ryan4, October 20 @ 6:15 PM (1/1)

Nice Commentary. That's Exactly What Afilias Doesn't What Us To Know. — Facilitator, October 21 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)

Why Didn't Afilias Include .Shop And Others On Their Application? — Eliahu, October 20 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)
Domain Names With Built-In Brand Equity Will Be Taken Out Of Use Under Afilias Plan! — Facilitator, October 20 @ 4:55 PM (0/0)
New Argument For Opposing Afilias Plan!!! — Facilitator, October 20 @ 4:44 PM (0/0)
Useless — julie, October 20 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)
Lack Of Afilias Representation In This Forum — pilot, October 20 @ 4:05 PM (2/2)

the powerful MONOPOLY =Afilias is INdiFFERENT to public opinion — ian-francis-xavier, October 21 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)
Opposing/Informatioal Comments — PHXbird, October 20 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

wrong-headed methodology — sourceview, October 20 @ 4:01 PM (0/0)
dispute between CNN and cnnews.com — marry2000, October 20 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
ICANN - Opportunity to require enforcement of policy — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
AFILIAS - Is it unethical . . . ? — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 11:57 AM (1/1)

It's Pure & Simple Cronyism — Facilitator, October 20 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)

CORE apparently unwilling to properly manage US CORE Members — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 10:54 AM (1/18)

What business practices? — Makla, October 20 @ 12:14 AM (2/17)

Disgruntled — Sarah, October 20 @ 2:14 PM (2/5)

ALLDNS - not disgruntled and plays fair and by ICANN Rules — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 4:13 PM (1/2)

Just READ — Sarah, October 20 @ 5:41 PM (1/1)

ALLDNS Reply — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)

ALLDNS vs. CORE — friedrich, October 20 @ 2:38 PM (1/1)

You're Right — Sarah, October 20 @ 3:15 PM (0/0)

CORE Business Practices — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 1:39 PM (2/10)

A Response — DanielK, October 20 @ 3:00 PM (4/8)

ALLDNS Email to Jeff Smith that CASDNS Rep. mentioned — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
DanielK: would you mind answering to my questions, too? Thank you! — friedrich, October 20 @ 6:27 PM (0/0)
ALLDNS reply for the record — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 6:01 PM (1/4)

Read that example, please. — friedrich, October 20 @ 6:39 PM (1/3)

Friedrich, I thought we were staying out if this mess? — Sarah, October 20 @ 7:03 PM (1/2)

Sarah, two days ago I didn't even know that ALLDNS existed! — friedrich, October 20 @ 9:08 PM (1/1)

ALLDNS to Friedrich — ALLDNS, October 21 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)

Thanks — Makla, October 20 @ 3:35 PM (0/0)

CORE — friedrich, October 20 @ 2:26 PM (0/0)

Complaints Regarding CASDNS Business Practices Requested — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 9:00 AM (0/0)
Complaints Regarding CORE & ASS Business Practices Requested — ALLDNS, October 20 @ 8:48 AM (0/0)
Afilias:Competition and Ken Stubbs — Merlin, October 20 @ 8:26 AM (1/7)

Blatent Lies Here — global view, October 20 @ 11:45 AM (6/6)

Ken Stubbs affiliations per Ken Stubbs — IODSupporter, October 20 @ 3:58 PM (0/0)
Global View - Flim Flam Artist — Facilitator, October 20 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
Bother to Read — Merlin, October 20 @ 3:36 PM (0/0)
THE KEN STUBBS LIE EXPOSED — Eliahu, October 20 @ 3:24 PM (0/0)
MR. STUBBS — friedrich, October 20 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
Integrity — Ray, October 20 @ 12:36 AM (0/0)

Affilias vs. Afilias — enforcer, October 20 @ 8:23 AM (3/3)

Where's the management team? — Ray, October 20 @ 12:54 AM (0/0)
Consequences? — friedrich, October 20 @ 8:51 AM (0/0)
Future Afilias — enforcer, October 20 @ 8:39 AM (0/0)

Top level Domain names - — ravicabral, October 20 @ 8:08 AM (1/1)

Your Bang On — enforcer, October 20 @ 8:18 AM (0/0)

Precedent:::: InterNic Permitted **PRE** registrations in 1993 — ian-francis-xavier, October 20 @ 6:23 AM (0/0)
General Observations of the Past Few Days — Facilitator, October 20 @ 5:50 AM (0/0)
September Names Council Meeting! — jtrade, October 20 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)
How Generic are these proposals - internationalisation? — internat?, October 20 @ 4:10 AM (0/0)
Ethics, competition, pioneer rights — Hather, October 20 @ 3:45 AM (1/1)

Please acknowlege the honest work by IOD — nessa, October 20 @ 3:55 AM (0/0)

Network Solutions and Bad Security — jtrade, October 20 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)
Names Council Meeting — jtrade, October 20 @ 1:10 AM (2/4)

Names Council Meeting — pilot, October 20 @ 2:52 AM (1/1)

Damage Control! — Facilitator, October 20 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)

As chair in Japan meeting, Ken Stubbs/AFILIAS on his mind while listening to questions! — first1, October 20 @ 2:19 AM (1/1)

Just How Far Back In Time Does Ken's Relationship Go With Afilias? — Facilitator, October 20 @ 4:47 PM (0/0)

more trademark problems in surprising places — Judith Oppenheimer, October 20 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)
ICANN scammed out of $950,000 I agree — Merlin, October 20 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)
Think Afilias is bad, check out a future Communist Government owned registry — emc2, October 19 @ 10:28 PM (2/3)

Just From A Practical Standpoint-Afilias Won't Be Good — Facilitator, October 20 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
Some Afilias members will NOT allow you to register "Communisn" — ian-francis-xavier, October 20 @ 2:13 AM (1/1)

2 bad eggs to choose from — emc2, October 20 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)

THE TRUTH: Some trademarks will become invalid. — friedrich, October 19 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
More Conflict of Interest? — jtrade, October 19 @ 8:32 PM (1/1)

Very good point. This is merely one of the many many "conflict of interest" issues at hand. — cgrady, October 19 @ 9:22 PM (0/0)

Afilias/NSI - a Cybersquatter in bad faith? — Rebeka, October 19 @ 7:22 PM (3/3)

How would ICANN end? — ville, October 20 @ 4:32 AM (0/0)
Auto-Renewals — Ray, October 20 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)
Excellent Point — jranes2, October 19 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)

.traveln — traveln, October 19 @ 7:08 PM (2/3)

IATA is the Only Option! — frequent traveller, October 20 @ 2:51 PM (1/1)

in oposition to IATA's request for TDL — oldham, Mon 6:25 PM (0/0)

Proper posting location — PHXbird, October 19 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)

Pre-registrations were allowed in 1993 for .com — fabrcop, October 19 @ 4:28 PM (3/6)

IODesign OBEYED the Rules UNlike Network Solutions alliance with DOT.tv — ian-francis-xavier, October 20 @ 2:02 AM (0/0)
You hit the nail on the head — cgrady, October 19 @ 7:04 PM (1/2)

honesty, integrity, and trust — larreeee, October 19 @ 7:41 PM (1/1)

Integrity — enforcer, October 19 @ 8:33 PM (0/0)

Most People Don't Like To Shoot Themselves - I'm Not Sure About ICANN Though — Eliahu, October 19 @ 4:51 PM (1/1)

Response — PHXbird, October 19 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)

Unhappy Customers — Merlin, October 19 @ 8:38 AM (0/0)
Don't be suckered in by those Afilias supporters. What they say is absurd. Instead, support IOD... — USC, October 19 @ 8:37 AM (0/0)
Ken Stubbs,to close for comfort! — Merlin, October 19 @ 8:30 AM (0/0)
Don't be too hasty - use established registrars — vicspanner, October 19 @ 7:42 AM (1/5)

Image Online Design HAS a proven track record....... — USC, October 19 @ 8:34 AM (1/4)

Just tell me which one is better! — wiredz, October 19 @ 7:36 PM (2/3)

Competition — marshm, October 20 @ 12:42 AM (0/0)
Reply — cambler, October 19 @ 8:13 PM (1/1)

IOD Will never get .Web — wiredz, October 26 @ 12:50 AM (0/0)

GO TO WWW.JOINFOCI.ORG........ SUPPORT IMAGE ONLINE DESIGN'S .WEB.......AFILIAS SHMAFILIAS!!!!!!! — USC, October 19 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)
The UDRP will make all discussion concerning initial domain registration useless... — zzmars, October 19 @ 6:21 AM (0/0)
Link to Slide Presentations on NSI's Future Plans — RDM, October 19 @ 6:12 AM (1/1)

NSI is a MONOPOLY — manny, October 19 @ 6:47 AM (0/0)

IOD Exposed #6 (sex.web) — Whistleblower, October 19 @ 5:14 AM (10/13)

I was impressed because IOD did NOT reserve several domains — fabrcop, October 19 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
Sir, there is no fire here. — For The People, October 19 @ 10:11 AM (1/2)

NSI does not own single-letter domains — wiredz, October 19 @ 7:46 PM (1/1)

Yes — For The People, October 19 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)

cybersquating & speculating is NOT the issue //it's control of INFO by AOL — ian-francis-xavier, October 19 @ 7:05 AM (0/0)
Thanks "Whistle Blower" You managed to get us off topic...which i suspect you wanted... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 6:03 AM (0/0)
Conflict of Interest Defined — jtrade, October 19 @ 6:02 AM (0/0)
Conspiracy? Try Blatant abuse — jranes2, October 19 @ 5:55 AM (0/0)
You Are Unjustly Comparing "Conflict Of Interest" With "Insider Trading" — Eliahu, October 19 @ 5:52 AM (0/0)
Thanks for the compliment! You closet posters only help IOD's postion... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 5:41 AM (0/0)
Scared — jtrade, October 19 @ 5:35 AM (0/0)
Yup... — cambler, October 19 @ 5:18 AM (1/1)

Friends are still legal! — mbrittan, October 19 @ 3:04 PM (0/0)

IOD Exposed #5 (the witnesses speak) — Whistleblower, October 19 @ 4:48 AM (2/3)

"whistleblower" ARE YOU KEN STUBBS? — first1, October 19 @ 5:05 AM (1/1)

O.K to be fair---let's not refer to Ken Stubbs in this forum... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 5:57 AM (0/0)

Yup... — cambler, October 19 @ 4:56 AM (0/0)

IOD Exposed #4 (what the court had to say) — Whistleblower, October 19 @ 4:37 AM (2/2)

Court Evidence Is Already Published On ICANN Web Site — wiredz, October 26 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)
Yup... — cambler, October 19 @ 4:48 AM (0/0)

IOD Exposed #3 — Whistleblower, October 19 @ 4:09 AM (2/2)

Do you realize your postings provide further validation of Chris Ambler and .WEB? — cgrady, October 19 @ 4:24 AM (0/0)
Weak Smear Campaign — jtrade, October 19 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)

IOD Exposed #2 — Whistleblower, October 19 @ 4:03 AM (3/4)

You AGAIN miss one HUGE point. — cgrady, October 19 @ 4:12 AM (1/1)

Actually, no... — cambler, October 19 @ 4:18 AM (0/0)

Last response to this person — cambler, October 19 @ 4:09 AM (0/0)
I wish I had written it — marshm, October 19 @ 4:07 AM (0/0)

IOD Exposed #1 — Whistleblower, October 19 @ 3:44 AM (5/5)

Only the lonely.....This type of posting shows you THAT IOD's Application stand on it's own... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
Your finding doesn't say what you think it says. — cgrady, October 19 @ 4:04 AM (0/0)
Some facts to help out here — marshm, October 19 @ 4:01 AM (0/0)
whistleblow what? — jtrade, October 19 @ 3:59 AM (0/0)
Reply — cambler, October 19 @ 3:58 AM (0/0)

Only Chartered TLDs — dmhwalker, October 19 @ 3:03 AM (1/1)

There is more... — marshm, October 19 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)

Network Solutions and Restraint of Trade — jtrade, October 19 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)
NSI Experienced High Level of Uncollectible Receivables - Latest 10-K — RDM, October 19 @ 12:36 AM (1/4)

Yes, look into every aspect you can on all applicants — marshm, October 19 @ 3:05 AM (2/3)

Reply — RDM, October 19 @ 4:55 AM (0/0)
Pot,Kettle,Black — global view, October 19 @ 3:55 AM (1/1)

Disclosure — marshm, October 19 @ 4:37 AM (0/0)

ICANN'T TOLERATE CORRUPTION — jranes2, October 19 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)
Why doesn't everyone support IOD? — Doc again, October 18 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
Interesting Article — RDM, October 18 @ 11:35 PM (2/3)

This is EXACTLY how a monopoly operates...Massive Media ...Get your Econ 101 book out... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 12:22 AM (1/1)

IOD vs. Afilias — ville, October 19 @ 1:18 AM (0/0)

Another Interesting Article — RDM, October 18 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)

Did Ken Stubbs Have Access To IOD's Application Before Afillias Submitted? — Mr. Lawrence1, October 18 @ 11:32 PM (3/13)

IOD Submitted on October 2 — cambler, October 19 @ 12:17 AM (3/10)

Bad move Here Sir — global view, October 19 @ 3:08 AM (2/7)

Global---Were you reading the correct thread??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 3:42 AM (0/0)
Response — cambler, October 19 @ 3:25 AM (1/5)

response — global view, October 19 @ 3:45 AM (2/4)

Final response — cambler, October 19 @ 4:04 AM (1/2)

This is immature. — jwatts, October 19 @ 11:15 PM (1/1)

I wasn't going to respond...but... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 3:33 AM (0/0)

It reallly does go to show you..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19 @ 4:02 AM (0/0)

Mr. Ambler — Mr. Lawrence1, October 19 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)
I Stand Corrected, However, No Less Skeptical Of This Process — Mr. Lawrence1, October 19 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)

One More To Add To The List — Eliahu, October 19 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)
Interesting. — For The People, October 18 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)

.kids domain — prshaw, October 18 @ 10:15 PM (0/0)
How does ICANN Vote? — Merlin , October 18 @ 9:47 PM (3/3)

Another Source — RDM, October 18 @ 11:25 PM (0/0)
Source — RDM, October 18 @ 10:05 PM (0/0)
Reply — RDM, October 18 @ 9:55 PM (0/0)

My Internet, your Internet, our Internet! — friedrich, October 18 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
ICANN Will Pick Afilias? — Eliahu, October 18 @ 8:53 PM (3/3)

Trash Journalism — enforcer, October 19 @ 4:19 AM (0/0)
Two Words — RDM, October 18 @ 9:52 PM (0/0)
Theregister has about as much creditability as a comic book — global view, October 18 @ 9:08 PM (0/0)

Oversight — RDM, October 18 @ 8:17 PM (1/2)

Oversight — jandl, October 18 @ 11:16 PM (1/1)

Thanks! — RDM, October 18 @ 11:40 PM (0/0)

ICANN is the cause of the indignation, NOT IOD supporters — vdfman, October 18 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)
For ICANN to award .web to Afilias would be a massive anti-trust issue. — Hudgens, October 18 @ 7:43 PM (1/1)

thank you — jandl, October 18 @ 11:24 PM (0/0)

Just got "bulk-mailed" by NSI — PHXbird, October 18 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
After thorough research of applications, I agree with IOD... — zzmars, October 18 @ 6:50 PM (0/0)
IOD supporters make the news! — ludacris, October 18 @ 5:59 PM (0/0)
¼¼°è °¢±¹ ¾ð¾î·Î Æ÷·³ÀÌ °³¼³µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÏ¸ç, ¼¼°è ¸ðµç »ç¶÷ÀÇ ÀÇ»ç°¡ ÀÚÀ¯·Ó°Ô Ç¥½ÃµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. — JP Kim, October 18 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)
Network Solutions Scandal — Merlin, October 18 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
Real People Don't Care — philberent, October 18 @ 4:05 PM (5/9)

not agreeable — cello, October 19 @ 1:18 AM (0/0)
REAL people WILL care after it is too late. This is historically the case. — cgrady, October 18 @ 7:19 PM (1/3)

Just not True — global view, October 18 @ 8:27 PM (2/2)

On the contrary..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 20 @ 4:12 AM (0/0)
Mr./Mrs./Ms. View, or can I refer to you by your first name ... Global? — cgrady, October 19 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)

Utilizing ignorance compression algorithm?? — vdfman, October 18 @ 6:25 PM (1/1)

Everybody Is Welcome To Post Here — pilot, October 18 @ 6:55 PM (0/0)

Real People Don't Care — shawn, October 18 @ 6:23 PM (0/0)
You're absolutely right — ludacris, October 18 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)

Timing of Decision Making Process — Pistoff, October 18 @ 3:46 PM (1/1)

Not a conspiracy theorist, but . . — vdfman, October 18 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)

name-space knows how to do it — asw, October 18 @ 12:32 AM (1/1)

Name-Space — shawn, October 18 @ 6:55 PM (0/0)

The importance of Meaning and Generality — Filip, October 18 @ 12:24 AM (0/0)
Ken Stubbs has links to 15 TLDs!! — doc again, October 18 @ 11:53 AM (1/1)

At least some get the picture — jandl, October 18 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)

IOD = excellent customer service — treherne, October 18 @ 9:30 AM (1/1)

Way to go IOD....just another reason, why we ....."Believe in IOD"....... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 18 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)

Neustar and Afilias Bid to Steal .Web — jtrade, October 18 @ 1:47 AM (2/2)

Yes, it's very important to introduce competition — saskia, October 18 @ 11:36 AM (0/0)
Neustar and Afilias comments properly go in a thread towards the bottom — keith246, October 18 @ 5:17 AM (0/0)

David vs Goliath — CBK, October 18 @ 1:28 AM (0/0)
Dot..tv registration is highly questionable. — zeo, October 17 @ 11:13 PM (2/2)

RE: Dot..tv registration is highly questionable — julie, October 20 @ 12:54 AM (0/0)
Questionable registration practices — marshm, October 17 @ 11:23 PM (0/0)

No monopolies please — RKnight, October 17 @ 9:59 PM (1/6)

Registration scramble — RKnight, October 17 @ 10:30 PM (2/5)

ICANN must reject unrestricted first-come-first-served unlimited applications — keith246, October 18 @ 5:14 AM (2/2)

tradenames — treherne, October 18 @ 9:03 AM (0/0)
ICANN is Government Intervention — Ray, October 18 @ 6:09 AM (0/0)

Hours or Years? — ville, October 17 @ 10:48 PM (1/1)

Oy — For The People, October 18 @ 4:15 AM (0/0)

Why all the focus on ONE TLD? — lapointe, October 17 @ 8:37 PM (1/15)

I'll Tell You Why The Fuss — Eliahu, October 18 @ 12:30 AM (2/14)

More gTLDs is the solution — johnm, October 18 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)
People have already paid for their domain names on a gamble — keith246, October 18 @ 3:44 AM (4/12)

trademarks issue and monopoply — 4icann, October 22 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)
You Are Right - So Am I — Eliahu, October 18 @ 4:30 AM (0/0)
In your opinion...However you have every right to that opinion...i just ask you to seek the truth! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 18 @ 4:22 AM (1/1)

i didn't think he was asking which side is right — keith246, October 18 @ 4:57 AM (0/0)

IOD's Supporters — cambler, October 18 @ 4:12 AM (4/7)

IOD — Michael Fox, October 18 @ 5:14 PM (0/0)
Great reply! — fabrcop, October 18 @ 1:38 PM (0/0)
Support IOD — treherne, October 18 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)
just my opinion — dezi, October 18 @ 4:48 AM (1/3)

Good opion, dezi! — wiredz, October 18 @ 4:39 PM (2/2)

Lame? — tlilley, October 19 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)
Answer — cambler, October 18 @ 7:27 PM (0/0)

Neustar Attempting to BRIBE ICANN? — jtrade, October 17 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)
Throwing out the .kid with the .xxx bathwater. — markusbaccus, October 17 @ 8:09 PM (1/3)

Time For Regulation Is At Hand ! It's About Our Children — AdvantaTel, October 18 @ 12:31 AM (1/2)

The internet is not a children's reading room, nor a substitute for parental supervision — markusbaccus, October 24 @ 7:25 PM (1/1)

A bit much. — WorldThoughts, October 24 @ 8:06 PM (0/0)

World Thoughts, A Must Read — jtrade, October 17 @ 7:42 PM (4/34)

For the proper place to post on IOD scroll down to where you see .WEB at the bottom — keith246, October 17 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)
Finally, a defense of capitalism. — markusbaccus, October 17 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)
WEBhogging — ville, October 17 @ 9:16 PM (2/21)

Waaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh! I didn't get any .web domains!!! — markusbaccus, October 17 @ 10:01 PM (1/14)

speculating = leeching — ville, October 17 @ 10:18 PM (3/13)

Let's Do It ! — Ray, October 18 @ 4:48 AM (0/0)
Annoying — For The People, October 18 @ 2:08 AM (1/10)

Dozens of domains! — ville, October 18 @ 2:16 AM (4/9)

Starting a new registry can't avoid speculation either! — fabrcop, October 18 @ 8:07 PM (0/0)
dishonesty — Ray, October 18 @ 5:42 AM (1/3)

Complaining over what?!!!!!! — For The People, October 18 @ 8:12 AM (1/2)

woops ! — Ray, October 18 @ 1:16 PM (1/1)

Apology — For The People, October 18 @ 10:53 PM (0/0)

Mind Reader — Merlin, October 18 @ 2:35 AM (1/1)

Actually... — For The People, October 18 @ 2:49 AM (0/0)

Knowledge — For The People, October 18 @ 2:33 AM (1/1)

Value of .law to General Public — bmanz, Sat 1:25 AM (0/0)

advocates for fairness=whining — markusbaccus, October 17 @ 10:38 PM (0/0)

DOMAIN ENVY! — shawn, October 17 @ 9:54 PM (2/5)

Regarding Afilias — Pistoff, October 17 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
Foresight? — ville, October 17 @ 10:07 PM (2/3)

rebuttal — markusbaccus, October 17 @ 10:28 PM (0/0)
Foresight — shawn, October 17 @ 10:23 PM (1/1)

Registering domains — ville, October 17 @ 10:30 PM (0/0)

Spare us your rhetoric — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 7:51 PM (3/9)

PLEASE take the time to read IOD's Application...that is what they are standing behind!!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 8:19 PM (1/4)

I've read their application... — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 8:45 PM (2/3)

You bring up some valid points....IN Favor of IOD.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
Your technical objections — cambler, October 17 @ 9:13 PM (1/1)

Sole registry for pilot period — marshm, October 17 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)

Let's just forget the hype — Merlin, October 17 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)
ForgetForgetTheHype — For The People, October 17 @ 8:02 PM (1/2)

I'm not here to charm you — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 8:06 PM (1/1)

Don't need the charm — For The People, October 17 @ 8:13 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs & Conflict Of Interest Policy — RDM, October 17 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)
Interesting Article — RDM, October 17 @ 5:46 PM (1/4)

Please Post this in the Name=Space Area...it is interesting... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 6:04 PM (1/3)

Is Greg Krajewski the moderator? — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 6:44 PM (2/2)

I think... — For The People, October 17 @ 6:59 PM (0/0)
No I am not the moderator...just trying to direct traffic....sorry — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)

Want to see another monopoly? — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 5:41 PM (5/48)

My point exactly... — zzmars, October 17 @ 9:58 PM (2/5)

Unaware of IOD — PHXbird, October 17 @ 10:41 PM (0/0)
IOD v. IANA, 1997 — cambler, October 17 @ 10:10 PM (2/3)

That "Pioneer Preference" Arguement is getting very old — global view, October 18 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)
Case In Point... — zzmars, October 17 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)

Ya Right — jranes1, October 17 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)

Incidentally.... — For The People, October 17 @ 7:12 PM (1/4)

Scripts — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 7:26 PM (3/3)

Flawed reasoning — cgrady, October 27 @ 1:51 AM (0/0)
"forget the hype"...Are you Ken Stubbs? — first1, October 18 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)
Tech — For The People, October 17 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)

Um.... — For The People, October 17 @ 7:07 PM (0/0)
If you would have went to the IOD area below...you would have read... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 6:02 PM (1/4)

It doesn't matter — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 6:22 PM (1/3)

Sir, Amazon.com, P&G, Microsoft probably EACH only a couple of thousand generic dot com's — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 6:46 PM (1/2)

Please visit companysleuth.com — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 7:00 PM (1/1)

Cool site. You see that Greg? — BrianC, October 18 @ 8:44 AM (0/0)

Interesting — RDM, October 17 @ 5:48 PM (1/30)

Re: Interesting — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 6:14 PM (4/29)

Revoke IODs Registrations? Just Try To Put Toothpaste Back Into The Tube. — pilot, October 17 @ 6:49 PM (1/8)

Matter of fairness — ville, October 17 @ 9:30 PM (1/7)

Matter Of Fairness — pilot, October 17 @ 10:02 PM (1/6)

Matter of Fairness — ville, October 17 @ 10:26 PM (2/5)

Fairness....what is fair? — For The People, October 18 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)
Matter Of Fairness — pilot, October 18 @ 12:09 AM (1/3)

ok — For The People, October 18 @ 2:51 AM (1/2)

For The People, I Agree With You. I Only Responded To Ville's Comment — pilot, October 18 @ 3:20 AM (1/1)

Ooops. — For The People, October 18 @ 3:33 AM (0/0)

Business Risk — Merlin, October 17 @ 6:43 PM (2/14)

May I Amplify A Point — RDM, October 17 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)
Re: Business Risk — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 6:51 PM (2/12)

Motive — For The People, October 17 @ 7:18 PM (1/9)

Should have figured — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 7:43 PM (3/8)

FYI for the "HYPE"-----You can run, but you can't hide sir, from the simple truth... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 18 @ 3:56 AM (0/0)
Squabbling — PHXbird, October 17 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)
Take courtesy training. — For The People, October 17 @ 8:05 PM (1/5)

Too bad — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 8:11 PM (4/4)

Thats Not Capitalism — enforcer, October 17 @ 9:54 PM (0/0)
Criticism of Big Business — PHXbird, October 17 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
Capitalism — For The People, October 17 @ 9:08 PM (0/0)
Then You Support Capitalism. Good For You. — RDM, October 17 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)

No Hype — Merlin, October 17 @ 7:00 PM (1/1)

More ad hominem — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 7:15 PM (0/0)

How Did You Obtain # of Mr. Brittan's .Web Domain Names — RDM, October 17 @ 6:38 PM (1/1)

Reponse Received Below — RDM, October 17 @ 6:41 PM (0/0)

Reply — RDM, October 17 @ 6:20 PM (1/2)

Re: Reply — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 6:38 PM (1/1)

Sir... — For The People, October 17 @ 7:23 PM (0/0)

Any Connection With Afilias? (i.e. Affiliate Program) — Mario, October 17 @ 5:37 PM (0/0)
IOD Court Ruling - FACTS — ForgetTheHype, October 17 @ 5:26 PM (1/1)

It's IOD's Appplication that will land it the Dot Web TLD! "On it's merits alone" — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 7:03 PM (0/0)

IOD deserves .WEB, stop the monopoly — IraChandler, October 17 @ 4:46 PM (1/1)

IOD The True Dot Web — Omar, October 18 @ 3:14 AM (0/0)

Support for Image Online Design — URLMerchant, October 17 @ 4:12 PM (1/2)

I agree that IOD should control .WEB, but I have one problem... — zzmars, October 17 @ 5:05 PM (1/1)

Domains ARE Property — pilot, October 17 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)

Pre-Registration, even in .WEB, is premature — zzmars, October 17 @ 4:06 PM (3/3)

Sir, if you do not leave your name, you lose credibility....as we must do this in the "open" — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 5:19 PM (0/0)
Respectful Reply To ZZMARS — pilot, October 17 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)
Question? — RDM, October 17 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)

This process is extremely complicated especially if you don't speak English!! — Neila, October 17 @ 3:27 PM (1/1)

need, other language forum, korea, russia, china, japan ... — JP Kim, October 18 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)

We Need Help! — ChrisT, October 17 @ 2:50 PM (0/0)
IOD should be the owner of .WEB Addresses — Rhoades, October 17 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
Summary — fabrcop, October 17 @ 1:34 PM (0/0)
IO Design is clearly the owner of .web — chichit, October 17 @ 1:31 PM (1/1)

ICANN may face the same action Afternic took to force them to be fair — websitio, October 17 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)

It's all been said — vinny, October 17 @ 12:48 AM (1/1)

IOD has proved To Be A Distinguished Registrar — chicagoan, October 17 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)

ICANN, WHY WON'T YOU COMMENT ON THE KEN STUBBS ISSUE? — anthony, October 17 @ 11:32 AM (1/1)

KEN sTubbs will be Investigated!!!! — chicagoan, October 17 @ 1:14 PM (0/0)

IOD .WEB — Michael Fox, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)

Vote for Small Business Not Ken Stubbs and Network Solutions — chicagoan, October 17 @ 1:11 PM (0/0)

Ethical Suicide — Merlin, October 17 @ 9:16 AM (1/1)

Cost of Doing Business! — RDM, October 17 @ 4:36 PM (0/0)

no .WEB at all — Makla, October 17 @ 8:52 AM (2/3)

It would be a non-sense to leave out .web, that is the most appreciated TLD! — fabrcop, October 17 @ 1:13 PM (1/1)

...most appreciated TLD, ha! — Makla, October 17 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

That might be what was intended? — anthony, October 17 @ 11:21 AM (0/0)

The Tangled .WEB They Weave.... — jtrade, October 17 @ 7:28 AM (1/1)

ICANN Promote Small Business, Award Image Online!! — chicagoan, October 17 @ 1:19 PM (0/0)

ICANN stop the Monopoly!! Save ANTI-TRUST LAWS!! — chicagoan, October 17 @ 1:17 PM (0/0)

About any proposed gTLD with strings and acronyms that implies geographical regions and .GEO — vany_martinez, October 17 @ 7:06 AM (0/0)
Monopolies MUST be stopped — C.Bell, October 17 @ 7:02 AM (1/1)

Yes, stop monopoly, promote competition — gfgs, October 17 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)

My history with NSI.. ** Please write YOURS ****** — rantawi, October 17 @ 6:51 AM (0/0)
About .KIDS, .WOMEN, .XXX and .SEX — vany_martinez, October 17 @ 6:37 AM (1/2)

Some of these countries haven't even outlawed slavery yet — keith246, October 18 @ 4:38 AM (1/1)

Re: Some of these countries haven't even outlawed slavery yet — vany_martinez, October 19 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)

Neustar Attempting to BRIBE ICANN for .WEB? — jtrade, October 17 @ 6:29 AM (0/0)
Posting of Applications & Legal bills (applicant for .web # 3) — BELLC, October 17 @ 6:27 AM (0/0)
Messages Commenting on gTLDs were Censored — keith246, October 17 @ 4:29 AM (0/0)
Most People not know what mean .pro .nom .biz .dir ... — JP Kim, October 17 @ 4:21 AM (0/0)
Parody gTLDs must be restricted to be permitted by the courts — keith246, October 17 @ 4:07 AM (0/0)
Concrete Name is more good for ASIA and Africa, East Europe, Latin America people. — JP Kim, October 17 @ 3:58 AM (1/1)

Precicely — DaveBusiness, October 17 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)

The issue isn't which 3 letters follow the last dot — keith246, October 17 @ 3:54 AM (0/0)
Unrestricted gTLDs will waste the resource and solve nothing — keith246, October 17 @ 3:42 AM (1/8)

Solving "cyberhoarding" — philberent, October 17 @ 5:40 AM (1/7)

More info — ville, October 17 @ 9:45 PM (1/6)

Getting in the way of what is seen as the ICANN get-rich-quick scheme — keith246, October 17 @ 10:23 PM (1/5)

Good idea! — ville, October 17 @ 10:39 PM (1/4)

yes guidelines needed -- they should be in the applications — keith246, October 17 @ 11:07 PM (1/3)

Geographical TLD's and registration guidelines — ville, October 17 @ 11:22 PM (2/2)

yes, the country level registrars did do some research — keith246, October 17 @ 11:51 PM (0/0)
Governments can steal names in unrestricted domains — keith246, October 17 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)

WEB TLD's — swallace, October 17 @ 3:37 AM (2/3)

Top Level Domain — ACI, October 20 @ 7:28 PM (1/1)

Top Level Domain — ACI, October 20 @ 7:34 PM (0/0)

After thorough research of applications, I agree with IOD... — zzmars, October 18 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)

BE FAIR — billlevy, October 17 @ 2:17 AM (0/0)
Explanation please... — huguesdb, October 17 @ 12:55 AM (2/6)

it makes money — keith246, October 17 @ 4:38 AM (1/1)

Who makes money? — huguesdb, October 17 @ 11:23 AM (0/0)

simple answer? — Ray, October 17 @ 2:13 AM (1/3)

ok for freedom of choice... — huguesdb, October 17 @ 11:17 AM (2/2)

two-for-one deals on domain names will do nothing to cure the name shortage — keith246, October 17 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)
Internet Stability — Ray, October 17 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)

IOD .Web supporters and those for Competition — jtrade, October 17 @ 12:19 AM (2/2)

IODesign should be a registrar for .Web regardless of ICANN decision — WebSitio, October 17 @ 2:10 AM (0/0)
A note to ICANN — Rmotion, October 17 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

.WEB TLD — vd, October 17 @ 12:15 AM (3/3)

.WEB - The vision — sirjeffer, October 17 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
WEB TLD's — swallace, October 17 @ 3:39 AM (0/0)
Note to ICANN - 2nd attempt — Rmotion, October 17 @ 2:17 AM (0/0)

web registry — tennis, October 16 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)
Support for Image Online Design and the .web TLD — Hudgens, October 16 @ 9:47 PM (4/6)

.WEB will quickly go out of style — keith246, October 17 @ 5:14 AM (0/0)
ICANN versus basic fairness — mdw, October 16 @ 11:36 PM (2/2)

ICANN Fairness - IOD and .web — Hudgens, October 18 @ 7:39 PM (0/0)
I think we are in the same NSI been screwed club — emc2, October 17 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)

Another vote for IOD. — jumper, October 16 @ 10:40 PM (0/0)
Yes, please Encourage competition! — stuart, October 16 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)

We all want .web, can Afilias and IOD run it together? — Stoertebeker, October 16 @ 8:06 PM (1/1)

Yes, but only one can be the registry (the other one would be a registrar) — fabrcop, October 16 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)

Afilias.tv — Merlin, October 16 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
Jon Postel's words — Reidar, October 16 @ 6:24 PM (2/2)

In tribute to Jon Postel... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)
Thanks! — RDM, October 16 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs - VP & Director of iDomain, Inc. (Another Applicant) — RDM, October 16 @ 6:18 PM (0/0)
Ken Stubbs/Sunrise Period — Merlin, October 16 @ 6:11 PM (0/0)
TLD applications .kids — algajola24, October 16 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)
Read the applications: IODesign is the best choice for .web — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:36 PM (0/0)
Vote to extend discussion forum — emc2, October 16 @ 5:17 PM (1/1)

Extend the forum, yes. — keith246, October 17 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)

Now you can pre-register for the 7 new TLD's .firm, .shop, .arts, .rec, .info, .nom and .web free! — Rebeka, October 16 @ 4:56 PM (2/8)

STOP PRODUCING FUD — KMalorny, October 17 @ 7:44 AM (1/4)

Pre-Registrations or Registrations at CORE's knipp.de? — Rebeka, October 17 @ 8:37 PM (1/3)

P-R-E-Registrations — KMalorny, October 17 @ 10:40 PM (1/2)

P-R-E-regs — PHXbird, October 17 @ 11:23 PM (1/1)

Re: P-R-E-Regs — KMalorny, October 18 @ 7:22 AM (0/0)

Probably this is a old site about 1997 IAHC plan — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:18 PM (1/2)

Go to - http://www.knipp.de/home.html - and check it out for yourself! — Rebeka, October 16 @ 5:36 PM (1/1)

Don't care too much! See registrars.com's preregistrations also... — fabrcop, October 16 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)

Password Revoked Second Time — TheWebster2, October 16 @ 4:10 PM (5/10)

DotMoron Does The TheWebster3 Shuffle — TheWebster2, October 17 @ 7:24 AM (0/0)
it's a new world order conspiracy!!! — DotMorons, October 17 @ 1:09 AM (2/3)

Love The Dramatics — TheWebster2, October 17 @ 7:49 AM (0/0)
Besides my little joke, there IS a serious matter with censorship and espionage! — TheWebster3, October 17 @ 3:49 AM (1/1)

Kind Soul — TheWebster2, October 17 @ 7:41 AM (0/0)

Webster2's missing password — PHXbird, October 16 @ 10:38 PM (0/0)
My name was revoked as well — icann_, October 16 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
Please stop drinking, Webster2! :-)) — TheWebster3, October 16 @ 4:25 PM (1/2)

Reponse — TheWebster2, October 16 @ 4:41 PM (1/1)

I Agree With TheWebster3 - What's The Big Deal — Mario, October 16 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)

There are other applications to consider — lapointe, October 16 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
No advantage for IOD for their bad business pratice — KMalorny, October 16 @ 2:52 PM (2/5)

Greedy???? — jranes1, October 17 @ 12:22 AM (2/2)

the lobby of the trademark. — 4icann, October 20 @ 8:00 AM (0/0)
Re: Greedy???? — KMalorny, October 17 @ 8:00 AM (0/0)

ICANN will make a good job and the only criteria is the application. And IOD wins! — Rebeka, October 16 @ 3:28 PM (1/1)

Nothing new — KMalorny, October 16 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)

Questions for C.Ambler (IOD) — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 10:19 AM (1/5)

Answers below — cambler, October 16 @ 6:53 PM (2/4)

To C.Ambler, IOD: objections — IODskeptic, October 19 @ 2:08 PM (0/0)
?? I can't find them — IODskeptic, October 16 @ 8:05 PM (1/2)

Answers — cambler, October 16 @ 8:07 PM (1/1)

Thanks, Chris! — For The People, October 16 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs - how many apps are you involved with? — jandl, October 16 @ 8:46 AM (1/1)

Question — TheWebster2, October 16 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)

ICANN: I am waiting for answers from the respective APPLICANTS in this FORUM! — friedrich, October 16 @ 8:12 AM (3/4)

I Agree...Mr Ambler from IOD has made himself available to answer questions about the IOD applicatio — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 2:14 AM (0/0)
There are others — marshm, October 16 @ 12:14 AM (1/1)

Thank you for participating — friedrich, October 18 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)

Yes, these discussions are important! — Reidar, October 16 @ 9:19 AM (0/0)

Cookie Web-bugs use explodes with additional generic TLDs — davebr, October 16 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
Moderator, where are you? — pedro, October 16 @ 5:46 AM (3/3)

Moderator:Perhaps sub forums should be set up for those two applicants now — keith246, October 17 @ 4:42 AM (0/0)
Socks in the Shirt Drawer — For The People, October 16 @ 9:04 AM (0/0)
ICANN does enough censoring — jandl, October 16 @ 8:14 AM (0/0)

Reply to Hold on a second... — marshm, — emc2, October 16 @ 5:08 AM (0/0)
Delay Selection of New GTLDs Until New Board Members Added — enforcer, October 16 @ 4:20 AM (1/1)

Public Accountablilty — lrfarny, October 17 @ 2:45 AM (0/0)

Name-Space — fred, October 16 @ 3:54 AM (1/2)

A Problem with Name.Space's Application — lrfarny, October 16 @ 7:25 PM (1/1)

name space brings in critical vision and technology — dabbio, October 17 @ 10:27 AM (0/0)

Are we missing the point here? — marshm, October 16 @ 3:35 AM (3/3)

for the first-come-first-served registrar requests it is hard to see how they can fail — keith246, October 17 @ 4:55 AM (0/0)
Well said, Gene — lrfarny, October 17 @ 2:49 AM (0/0)
Excellent Comments from Diebold... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 16 @ 4:47 AM (0/0)

How can Stubbs be removed from ICANN? — mmtb1111, October 16 @ 2:42 AM (1/1)

Ask Kiyu... — RDM, October 16 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)

Want accept all TLDs, .art .trade .market .music ... — kim, October 16 @ 1:50 AM (3/5)

need many many TLDs — people, October 16 @ 6:48 AM (0/0)
TLDs, .sex , .art .trade .market .music .love Great Idea — gurdeep, October 16 @ 3:38 AM (1/2)

Red-Light and Green-Space TLDs — mpalage, October 17 @ 1:07 AM (1/1)

This seems clear — lrfarny, October 17 @ 3:46 AM (0/0)

That's Right, more need, ".country" — Russia, October 16 @ 2:37 AM (0/0)

Just LOOK at this place! (3 main issues) — anthony, October 16 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)
How can we comment on un-posted TLD applications ?? & trademarks issue — emc2, October 16 @ 12:05 AM (2/3)

Read my comments. — wiredz, October 18 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)
Hold on a second... — marshm, October 16 @ 1:37 AM (1/1)

Reply to Marshm — emc2, October 16 @ 5:11 PM (0/0)

Is .web not an 'alternate root system'? — huguesdb, October 16 @ 12:03 AM (2/6)

IOD is not an alternate root system — cambler, October 16 @ 7:38 PM (1/4)

Stop lying, Ambler — wiredz, October 18 @ 4:55 PM (3/3)

Reply to "wiredz" , aka Eugene — bartender, October 19 @ 3:59 AM (0/0)
You need to do some studying — jandl, October 19 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
Roots — cambler, October 18 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)

.WEB is not a root system — jandl, October 16 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)

Honoring Existing Contracts — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)
We are so caught up, we are forgetting one thing. — For The People, October 15 @ 11:38 PM (1/2)

Waiting for an answer from a representative of AFILIAS! — friedrich, October 16 @ 7:50 AM (1/1)

The purpose of this forum — BrianC, October 16 @ 8:25 AM (0/0)

Go IOD ! — treherne, October 15 @ 11:19 PM (0/0)
Password Revoked — TheWebster, October 15 @ 10:28 PM (1/1)

Me too — For The People, October 15 @ 10:33 PM (0/0)

Project Trojan Horse — TheWebster1, October 15 @ 10:24 PM (1/1)

Sleazy Politics? — Merlin, October 15 @ 10:42 PM (0/0)

_ Ken Stubbs Should Step Down From ICANN or Afilias. — internet78, October 15 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
If Afilias has so much power, why do they not flood this message board with supporters? — Stoertebeker, October 15 @ 8:20 PM (2/6)

If Afilias has so much power, why do they not flood this message board with supporters? — Debug, October 17 @ 3:11 AM (1/4)

Maybe Afilias is smart? — BrianC, October 17 @ 6:22 AM (1/3)

BrianC....give it a rest....Explain, why Afilias has a "strong" case... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 7:46 AM (1/2)

The posts — BrianC, October 17 @ 9:33 AM (1/1)

We all need to articulate our comments....With that....CAN WE DISCUSS THE APPLICATIONS!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)

Power By Afilias — Mr. Lawrence, October 15 @ 8:43 PM (0/0)

If ICANN decides that Name.Space has the best application - do they get ALL their new TLD names? — Rebeka, October 15 @ 7:34 PM (2/6)

they should have inserted a link to the oxford english dictionary in their application — keith246, October 17 @ 5:05 AM (0/0)
No. — For The People, October 15 @ 7:36 PM (1/4)

Where are you seeing that — kiyu, October 15 @ 8:40 PM (3/3)

G-D, no! — For The People, October 15 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
Where? Hmmm. . . — For The People, October 15 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)
multiple gTLDs on an application — kiyu, October 15 @ 8:49 PM (0/0)

An Open Letter to IOD Supporters — cambler, October 15 @ 7:31 PM (4/7)

I totally agree....The application is what makes IOD stand out above the rest! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 16 @ 4:13 AM (0/0)
What's past is past? — Eliahu, October 16 @ 3:35 AM (1/1)

The Past vs. The Present — cambler, October 16 @ 7:50 PM (0/0)

Look at your signature line — pedro, October 15 @ 10:15 PM (1/1)

Well, how can I say this? . . . Um. . . you're wrong. — For The People, October 15 @ 10:39 PM (0/0)

Reply to Mr. Ambler — doc, October 15 @ 8:07 PM (1/1)

The points I brought up — cambler, October 15 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)

A 60 day sunrise period! — first1, October 15 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
Time frame for new TLDs — kularski, October 15 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)
Network Solutions SPOOKY Past — Merlin, October 15 @ 6:26 PM (1/1)

Thanks! Good Read. — RDM, October 16 @ 1:30 AM (0/0)

I am horrified by a sunrise period for the Afilias Cartel!!! — Rebeka, October 15 @ 5:52 PM (3/13)

What? Interrupt my golf? — americeo, October 15 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
Sunrise Period is illegal — Merlin, October 15 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)
sunrise period — kiyu, October 15 @ 5:57 PM (4/10)

Sunrise - Kiyu — pilot, October 15 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
Who gets UNITED? united airlines, united van lines? — first1, October 15 @ 7:13 PM (2/5)

Reply to "Who Gets United?" — lrfarny, October 17 @ 2:41 AM (0/0)
Whoever has it TMd — kiyu, October 15 @ 7:26 PM (3/3)

Expanded Question — RDM, October 16 @ 1:44 AM (0/0)
Will the US trademarks over ride other countries? — doc, October 15 @ 7:45 PM (0/0)
You said it yourself!!!! — Anthony, October 15 @ 7:31 PM (0/0)

Trademark Law — friedrich, October 15 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)
500'000 Trademarks? Where are they? — Rebeka, October 15 @ 6:02 PM (1/1)

restrictions — kiyu, October 15 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)

Afilias limits regestration to 10 years max!! — Anthony, October 15 @ 5:35 PM (1/1)

Limitation — kiyu, October 15 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)

TO ALL POSTERS: - Please list your name and Where you are from...ALSO more on our Grassroot Efforts — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)
Afilias - 100% conflict of interest — pedro, October 15 @ 5:22 PM (0/0)
Has the creation of AFILIAS been approved by respective authorities having supervision of cartels? — friedrich, October 15 @ 5:02 PM (1/1)

An excellent point — kiyu, October 15 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)

A matter of Public Trust — mhubbard, October 15 @ 4:51 PM (0/0)
IOD meets the criteria for stability, Affilias does not. — doc, October 15 @ 2:23 PM (1/28)

Affilias is the most reliable — kiyu, October 15 @ 4:05 PM (5/27)

Question??? — RDM, October 16 @ 2:03 AM (0/0)
Stability — cambler, October 15 @ 6:50 PM (0/0)
Capability — PHXbird, October 15 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
Risk management — friedrich, October 15 @ 4:43 PM (1/7)

IODs current system stress level — kiyu, October 15 @ 4:53 PM (4/6)

How Omniscient — RDM, October 16 @ 2:08 AM (0/0)
Stress Levels — cambler, October 15 @ 6:47 PM (1/2)

Stress Levels — kiyu, October 15 @ 8:37 PM (1/1)

Re: stress — cambler, October 15 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)

Different league — PHXbird, October 15 @ 6:27 PM (0/0)
Compare Afilias and IODs risk concerning an awaited respective stress level, please. — friedrich, October 15 @ 5:20 PM (0/0)

Reply — For The People, October 15 @ 4:08 PM (2/15)

How NSI started — kiyu, October 15 @ 4:41 PM (2/5)

Technical Answers — cambler, October 15 @ 7:08 PM (0/0)
Reply — For The People, October 15 @ 5:09 PM (1/3)

Clarification & apology to Mr. Ellison — kiyu, October 15 @ 5:25 PM (1/2)

Hey — For The People, October 15 @ 5:40 PM (1/1)

Understanding — kiyu, October 15 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)

Furthermore. . . — For The People, October 15 @ 4:14 PM (1/8)

What I want & what is best — kiyu, October 15 @ 5:14 PM (5/7)

What is Best??? — RDM, October 16 @ 2:31 AM (0/0)
Kiyu, I HAVE Researched The Afilias Application — pilot, October 15 @ 9:45 PM (0/0)
Afilias - too big for comfort — doc, October 15 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)
Crashes? — cambler, October 15 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)
What's missing? — For The People, October 15 @ 5:23 PM (1/2)

ONE gTLD — kiyu, October 15 @ 7:24 PM (1/1)

I have not heard — For The People, October 15 @ 7:40 PM (0/0)

The Comment Process to-date - An analysis — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:42 AM (2/2)

Perspectives — TheWebster1, October 16 @ 2:52 AM (0/0)
Truth be told...Are you Ken Stubbs? — first1, October 15 @ 4:13 PM (0/0)

same opinions — PSH, October 15 @ 9:33 AM (1/4)

TOO BAD PEOPLE DONT READ THE APPLICATIONS — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 2:10 PM (2/3)

Truth or dare! — first1, October 15 @ 5:06 PM (1/1)

Sunrise Surprise — Mario, October 16 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)

JUMPING to conclusions ... — friedrich, October 15 @ 2:51 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubs - Insider — TheWebster, October 15 @ 9:29 AM (0/0)
ICANN - how do you grant equal chances for all, to register new TLD's on day 1? — Rebeka, October 15 @ 8:59 AM (3/17)

The money making takes priority? — davebr, October 16 @ 7:35 AM (0/0)
One answer — BrianC, October 15 @ 9:12 AM (2/9)

The reason you want the .web registrations cancelled...... — For The People, October 15 @ 11:11 AM (1/4)

Risk-taking — BrianC, October 15 @ 10:25 PM (1/3)

Admit — For The People, October 15 @ 11:06 PM (1/2)

Loot your holdings? — BrianC, October 15 @ 11:22 PM (1/1)

Reply. — For The People, October 15 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)

Paradoxically the solution is just = accepting early registrations since 1996 — fabrcop, October 15 @ 9:22 AM (2/3)

definitely real — larreeee, October 15 @ 3:19 PM (1/1)

Thanks for the link! — larreeee, October 15 @ 3:24 PM (0/0)

Allegations — BrianC, October 15 @ 9:39 AM (0/0)

Simple solution for .web ... — fabrcop, October 15 @ 9:11 AM (1/5)

Random = fair — BrianC, October 15 @ 9:25 AM (3/4)

Please Define Fair, Sir... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
FAIR? — larreeee, October 15 @ 3:42 PM (1/1)

FAIR FOR IOD REGISTRANTS TO KEEP THEIR NAMES — pilot, October 16 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

Random is NOT fair — For The People, October 15 @ 11:14 AM (0/0)

It's the same feeling. — LGW, October 15 @ 8:54 AM (2/7)

I fully support your comment. — friedrich, October 15 @ 1:15 PM (0/0)
Useful link — fabrcop, October 15 @ 9:18 AM (1/5)

THE STRAIGHT SCOOP ON IO DESIGNS LEGAL HISTORY — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 11:17 AM (1/4)

It's important that we know what really happened — fabrcop, October 15 @ 1:11 PM (1/3)

INTERESTING FICTION — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 2:41 PM (2/2)

Fairness: everybody in the world knows that .web=IOD — fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:35 PM (0/0)
The Ignore It, Please — cambler, October 15 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)

Can of worms — pedro, October 15 @ 8:29 AM (1/2)

ICANN, please delete insulting messages — fabrcop, October 15 @ 8:38 AM (1/1)

language issue — pedro, October 15 @ 10:33 PM (0/0)

I am confident in ICANN's fairness — fabrcop, October 15 @ 7:21 AM (2/11)

probably .WEB will be irrelevant in just a few years — keith246, October 17 @ 5:02 AM (1/1)

Your Irrelevant Right Now — TheWebster2, October 17 @ 7:57 AM (0/0)

Powerful cartel led by NSI? — BrianC, October 15 @ 7:47 AM (2/8)

Pre-registrations or unfair name grabbing on day 1 by Big Companies. — Rebeka, October 15 @ 8:11 AM (1/6)

Evidence? — BrianC, October 15 @ 8:24 AM (3/5)

Random rush on day one — fabrcop, October 15 @ 8:48 AM (0/0)
Evidence Sir??? — RDM, October 15 @ 8:40 AM (0/0)
Procter and Gamble registered HUNDREDS of generic names ..... — Rebeka, October 15 @ 8:40 AM (1/2)

The round-robin system — BrianC, October 15 @ 8:51 AM (1/1)

Round Robin — For The People, October 15 @ 10:56 AM (0/0)

I believe that IODesign registrations would be considered 100% valid by a Court — fabrcop, October 15 @ 8:05 AM (0/0)

I waited almost 3 months for a NSI transfer! — first1, October 15 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)
Response delays — PHXbird, October 15 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)

PROTEST — pedro, October 15 @ 5:44 AM (2/9)

You've missed the point — anthony, October 15 @ 1:31 PM (1/1)

.com — For The People, October 15 @ 2:32 PM (0/0)

I STRONGLY disagree. — larreeee, October 15 @ 6:28 AM (2/6)

Say NO! to generic TLDS — korskarn, October 15 @ 5:24 PM (0/0)
you are off topic — pedro, October 15 @ 6:47 AM (3/4)

Pedro, don't think you are a mind-reader — For The People, October 15 @ 2:40 PM (0/0)
business.web — friedrich, October 15 @ 2:16 PM (1/1)

I support Freidrich and Business.web....from someone who has invested time in their .web business — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15 @ 10:53 PM (0/0)

Reversed logic — fabrcop, October 15 @ 8:20 AM (0/0)

Impropriety Not Likely — jranes, October 15 @ 2:57 AM (2/2)

Noble Thoughts, But... — TheWebster, October 15 @ 5:27 AM (0/0)
sounds good but.... — Ray, October 15 @ 3:30 AM (0/0)

TO THE MODERATOR: Can discussions be broken out by TLDs? — Robert_Jacobson, October 15 @ 2:49 AM (1/1)

I agree — pedro, October 15 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)

DO NOT ADD .XXX or .SEX CHOOSE MORE WISELY — Frank S., October 15 @ 2:34 AM (1/1)

You can't be more wrong! — korskarn, October 15 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -ATTENTION: ICANN — icann_, October 15 @ 2:20 AM (1/3)

simple question — pedro, October 15 @ 6:21 AM (2/2)

You can browse http://the.web with alternative root servers — fabrcop, October 15 @ 8:58 AM (0/0)
Simple answer — rik, October 15 @ 8:35 AM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs - CPA — TheWebster, October 15 @ 1:37 AM (0/0)
KEN STUBBS - SHAME ON YOU — Frank S., October 15 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)
Praise to IOD — q, October 15 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)
Keep NSI OUT! — kodo, October 15 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)
A Recommendation to Posters, A Call to ICANN — For The People, October 15 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
SPECULATION — friedrich, October 15 @ 12:19 AM (1/2)

Interesting Commentary — TheWebster, October 15 @ 5:51 AM (1/1)

Speculation — jandl, October 16 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)

a comment on the .web tld — economist, October 14 @ 11:57 PM (1/1)

Good common sense — vdfman, October 18 @ 9:23 PM (0/0)

This board is an embarassment — BrianC, October 14 @ 11:51 PM (5/11)

The board's fine, but this IOD, Aflias flame war has got to go. — lrfarny, October 17 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)
.WEB Tld — ianwil01, October 17 @ 2:06 AM (0/0)
We need a solution — Webster, October 15 @ 4:05 AM (0/0)
HAMMERING THE POINT HOME — pilot, October 15 @ 12:44 AM (1/6)

Hammering the wrong way — BrianC, October 15 @ 1:18 AM (3/5)

A MATURE & RESPONSIBLE ATTITUDE — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 15 @ 2:32 PM (0/0)
SOME POSTS TERRIBLE, OTHERS REALLY RELEVANT — pilot, October 15 @ 2:02 AM (1/2)

I'm sure ICANN will consider ALL views. — larreeee, October 15 @ 3:34 AM (1/1)

Reading is not considering — BrianC, October 15 @ 5:27 AM (0/0)

You said it... — kodo, October 15 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)

I doubt it — friedrich, October 15 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)

Quotes from the Afilias fact sheet. — hoffy, October 14 @ 10:58 PM (1/1)

Afilias IS an illusion... — larreeee, October 15 @ 3:43 AM (0/0)

TO ICANN: — Merlin, October 14 @ 10:48 PM (1/1)

Big boys cry hardest — hoffy, October 14 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)

ICANN in an Attempt to Censor our Posts? — Merlin, October 14 @ 10:31 PM (1/1)

Don't be daft — anthony, October 15 @ 1:41 PM (0/0)

SMOKE & MIRRORS — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 14 @ 9:23 PM (3/3)

Smoke and Mirrors — first1, October 15 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
Your "Smoke & Mirrors" — PHXbird, October 14 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
MULTIPLE POSTINGS BY INDIVIDUALS — pilot, October 14 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs - Caught in the act? — joshwa, October 14 @ 9:13 PM (0/0)
I support Afilias and registered Afilias.web today! — Stoertebeker, October 14 @ 9:05 PM (2/2)

??? — cello, October 15 @ 8:04 AM (0/0)
Afilias.web — PHXbird, October 14 @ 9:59 PM (0/0)

NSI and Register.com in Bed Together — Merlin, October 14 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)

NSI lawsuit keeps chipping away — PHXbird, October 14 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)

Message from Saudi Arabia - TRUTH about NSI and IOD — rantawi, October 14 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)
.Web — phelix00, October 14 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)

I agree — liquidsilver, October 15 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)

KEN STUBBS - WHO IS HE ? (I THINK WE ALL KNOW) — lew, October 14 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)
TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot Web/IOD /Supporters are getting ORGANIZED..Building a Website! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:52 PM (6/9)

Wonderful Idea! — larreeee, October 15 @ 3:52 AM (1/1)

Getting out the word — PHXbird, October 15 @ 3:58 AM (0/0)

Please post the URL — kodo, October 15 @ 1:54 AM (0/0)
Big mistake — Shayne, October 14 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)
If you support .WEB then the reverse should also be supported — jandl, October 14 @ 8:28 PM (1/1)

I agree with JANDL — Merlin, October 14 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)

Cool.. I will try to help... — rantawi, October 14 @ 8:05 PM (0/0)
GO GREG! You have my support! — first1, October 14 @ 7:02 PM (1/1)

Same here — joshwa, October 14 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)

How can one comment when the apps are not posted? — jandl, October 14 @ 6:28 PM (1/2)

Applications are found here — Shayne, October 14 @ 11:25 PM (1/1)

not all are posted — jandl, October 16 @ 12:15 AM (0/0)

Http://www.Afilias.tv — Merlin, October 14 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)
Fragmenting the net — jandl, October 14 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
NO IMAGE ONLINE AS A .WEB contract — jtuttle, October 14 @ 5:48 PM (6/8)

Ignorance — liquidsilver, October 15 @ 3:41 PM (0/0)
IODesign NEVER spammed me! — larreeee, October 14 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)
Jtuttle, IO DESIGN IS THE BEST — Carlos, October 14 @ 8:07 PM (0/0)
Rip WHO off? — hoffy, October 14 @ 6:55 PM (0/0)
YOUR A LIAR! show proof of any spamming! — first1, October 14 @ 6:00 PM (1/2)

True — Infinity, October 14 @ 6:05 PM (1/1)

FURTHERMORE, JTUTTLE! — Infinity, October 14 @ 6:11 PM (0/0)

What the $%@#% are you talking about — Infinity, October 14 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)

URGENT: Please watch this video of Ken Stubbs proving his abusive self-interest — Infinity, October 14 @ 5:43 PM (2/4)

Ken Stubbs is Disrespectful — Merlin, October 14 @ 6:03 PM (1/2)

Not go quietly? — PHXbird, October 14 @ 8:40 PM (1/1)

Only BusinessWeek — TheWebster, October 15 @ 6:45 AM (0/0)

Why didn't Ken Stubbs answer mr. Amblers question? — first1, October 14 @ 5:55 PM (0/0)

.SEX, .XXX, .KIDS TLDs Restrict Freedom of Speech — ron10000, October 14 @ 5:10 PM (8/8)

Opportunity for WWW to set a global standard — iceberg, Tue 3:32 PM (0/0)
IT'S ABOUT OUR KIDS ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, October 18 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
Quit hair-splitting. That's not what these domains are for. — lrfarny, October 17 @ 3:32 AM (0/0)
Red-Light & Green Space TLD (fact v. fiction) — mpalage, October 17 @ 2:32 AM (0/0)
.XXX, .SEX, ect — kularski, October 14 @ 10:21 PM (0/0)
.sex and .xxx domains — sairanx, October 14 @ 10:00 PM (0/0)
"Restrictive" TLDs — PHXbird, October 14 @ 8:53 PM (0/0)
What??!! — americeo, October 14 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)

IMAGE ONLINE IS DESERVING OF .WEB contract — chicagoan, October 14 @ 5:07 PM (2/5)

non se dan cuenta de que afilias quiere crear un monopoli... — ciudad, October 16 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)
NSI : AFILIAS are Monopolies! Please ICANN Stop them!! — chicagoan, October 14 @ 5:15 PM (2/3)

"NSI : AFILIAS are Monopolies!" — BrianC, October 15 @ 5:53 AM (1/1)

BrianC, ICANN Should Expect Some Garbage ... — Mr. Lawrence, October 16 @ 12:58 AM (0/0)

"Future MicroSoft"? — PHXbird, October 14 @ 8:55 PM (0/0)

IOD the .web pioneer — first1, October 14 @ 5:06 PM (2/6)

Contact your Congressmen! Afilias must be stopped! — first1, October 14 @ 5:23 PM (1/1)

Contacting congressmen (and congresswomen) — PHXbird, October 14 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)

CONTACT your Congressmen! Stop Afilias and the Monopoly — chicagoan, October 14 @ 5:10 PM (1/3)

Potential anti-trust problems — PHXbird, October 14 @ 9:03 PM (1/2)

anti-trust — jandl, October 17 @ 2:17 AM (1/1)

Clarification — PHXbird, October 17 @ 2:57 AM (0/0)

Application by Image Online Design — sduncan, October 14 @ 5:04 PM (3/7)

YOU GOT WHAT YOU PAID FOR !!! — TRUTH BE TOLD, October 14 @ 10:23 PM (4/4)

Followup Question — RDM, October 17 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
FAQ from IODesign's site — sduncan, October 16 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
For *$@~$s sake would you turn off your caps lock!! — anthony, October 16 @ 1:36 AM (0/0)
??? — TheWebster, October 15 @ 7:04 AM (0/0)

Why IOD should be given the right to handle .WEB — DannyD, October 14 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)
Ken Stubbs Conflict of Interest! Please Resign from ICANN board! — chicagoan, October 14 @ 5:13 PM (0/0)

Permission granted! Permission NEVER revoked! — larreeee, October 14 @ 5:01 PM (1/4)

I guess you mean IANA's authorization about IOD's .web registry — fabrcop, October 14 @ 5:26 PM (1/3)

Fabrcop — Webster, October 14 @ 6:10 PM (1/2)

The Facts of the Meeting — jtrade, October 14 @ 6:23 PM (1/1)

Here Explain THIS? — Webster, October 14 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)

Why is this even happening... — bags, October 14 @ 4:56 PM (2/2)

Reply - bit by bit — anthony, October 14 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)
Trademark policy — fabrcop, October 14 @ 5:18 PM (0/0)

Separation of Registry and Registrar Functions — RobS, October 14 @ 4:56 PM (1/1)

Do you know the CORE system? — friedrich, October 14 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)

IOD has acted in Good Faith — Robert Garner, October 14 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)

Afilais , Net Sol, MONOPOLY Anti-Trust Laws — chicagoan, October 14 @ 4:56 PM (0/0)

Another Monopol ? — Killah, October 14 @ 3:55 PM (0/0)
ICANN SCAMMED OUT OF ( $950,000 ) BY AFILIAS CARTEL! — AdvantaTel, October 14 @ 3:53 PM (2/12)

More ill-informed claims — BrianC, October 15 @ 6:05 AM (2/10)

YOU MISSED THE POINT ! ! ! — AdvantaTel, October 17 @ 1:08 AM (0/0)
I don't think it's hurting IOD — hoffy, October 15 @ 6:21 AM (1/8)

The facts — BrianC, October 15 @ 7:24 AM (4/7)

NSI Would Get $$ No Matter Which Afilias Registrar Takes Registrations — pilot, October 16 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)
Representation of IOD supporters — For The People, October 15 @ 6:01 PM (0/0)
Registrars — cambler, October 15 @ 8:01 AM (2/3)

Why a new RRP now? It needs to be defined BEFORE a new Registry is proposed to use it. — mikel5, October 26 @ 2:24 PM (0/0)
Thanks — BrianC, October 15 @ 8:09 AM (1/1)

Testing RRP — cambler, October 15 @ 8:19 AM (0/0)

David and Goliath — hoffy, October 15 @ 8:00 AM (0/0)

Minus $50,000 — hoffy, October 14 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)

Vote for .Web / Vote for IOD — anthony, October 14 @ 3:25 PM (2/3)

.web and IOD the only choice! — first1, October 14 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)
The World Is Watching — jtrade, October 14 @ 3:40 PM (1/1)

IOD IS .web! — americeo, October 14 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)

.WEB — MDS, October 14 @ 2:33 PM (2/7)

.web support — support_dot_web, October 14 @ 3:13 PM (0/0)
.WEB, Stubbs & Afilias — PHXbird, October 14 @ 3:08 PM (1/5)

Contacted Illinois Senators and Congressman — chicagoan, October 14 @ 5:04 PM (3/4)

IOD for .web registry — JDean, October 15 @ 9:18 AM (0/0)
Contacting decision-makers — PHXbird, October 14 @ 9:23 PM (0/0)
I Contacted Nevada Senators and Congressman — jtrade, October 14 @ 5:31 PM (1/1)

I wrote Senator Daschle (Senate Minority Leader) and Senator Johnson-SD- — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)

Have you ever dealt with NSI? — mpayette, October 14 @ 2:23 PM (0/0)
A general question to ICANN — cgrady, October 14 @ 7:43 AM (2/6)

A monopoly monopoly WOW! — first1, October 14 @ 5:38 PM (0/0)
Do You Know How to Read? — Webster, October 14 @ 8:02 AM (1/4)

Yes, I do know how to read but I do not think that YOU know how to read between the lines. — cgrady, October 14 @ 10:07 AM (1/3)

Between The LINES IS? — Webster, October 14 @ 11:03 AM (1/2)

OK, you have proven to us that you can post out of context links. — cgrady, October 14 @ 11:55 AM (1/1)

Relevent/ Read Your Dates... — Webster, October 14 @ 5:51 PM (0/0)

Ken Stubbs & Conflicts of Interest Policy — RDM, October 14 @ 5:10 AM (2/3)

READ KEN STUBBS' SWORN TESTIMONY AGAINST NSI. WHAT, ME WORRY? — pilot, October 14 @ 11:31 AM (1/1)

Mr Stubs we can't trust you! — first1, October 14 @ 5:16 PM (0/0)

Lack of Internal Controls at ICANN? — TheWebster, October 14 @ 5:59 AM (0/0)

EOI #22...I'm throwing my support to the IOD's .web registry — USC, October 14 @ 4:57 AM (0/0)
Keep NSI out — cbk, October 14 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)
.SEX, .XXX, .KIDS TLDs Restrict Freedom of Speech — ron10000, October 14 @ 3:31 AM (0/0)
NSI monopoly! — first1, October 14 @ 1:48 AM (3/4)

I will be writing Senators Boxer and Feinsten on Monday. — larreeee, October 14 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
Keep Ken Stubbs, NSI and Aflias OUT and IOD in — Loeee, October 14 @ 2:35 PM (1/1)

Keep Ken Stubbs, NSI and Aflias OUT and IOD in — Mel, October 14 @ 3:12 PM (0/0)

nop! — cello, October 14 @ 3:00 AM (0/0)

Keep NSI Out — Attorney, October 14 @ 1:37 AM (1/2)

reply to keep NSI out — anthony, October 14 @ 11:56 AM (1/1)

I agree! KEEP NSI OUT! — first1, October 14 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)

Keep NSI out — pedro, October 14 @ 12:49 AM (0/0)
After having read most of the applications: .WEB and IOD are the obvious choices — saskia, October 13 @ 11:11 PM (3/3)

It is fair that ICANN accepts .web registry by IODesign — fabrcop, October 14 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)
.web and IOD the obvious choice — first1, October 14 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)
"Web" Means "Internet" — Eliahu, October 14 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)

Why applicants for a TLD should pay 50 000 $ — lpele, October 13 @ 10:28 PM (2/3)

$50,000 is not a barrier — korskarn, October 15 @ 4:24 PM (0/0)
Correction : everybody should be able to have a free STLD (Sub Top level domain) — lpele, October 13 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)

4113 Total Messages

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy