ICANN Public Comments Forum | Forum on New TLD Applications

This Comment Forum is now closed.

ICANN Public Comment Forum

Forum on New TLD Applications

This Public Comment Forum is dedicated to discussion of New TLD Applications that have been submitted to ICANN. Please note that it is organized by top-level threads. Right below you will find a listing of specific threads, one for each application. If you have a comment about a particular TLD application, please comment in the thread for that application. To make a general comment, use the "General Comments" thread at the bottom of this forum page. You can go directly to the "General Comments" thread by clicking here.

Forum Closed Sunday, 5 November 2000.

.ads, etc. Application by Name.Space, Incorporated — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:39 PM (65/177)

Support for Name.Space and IOD — S. Hudgens, 11:44 PM (0/0)
Final Word To ICANN: Name-Space & IOD — Eliahu, 8:19 PM (1/1)

I support this comment — friedrich, 10:40 PM (0/0)

Say YES! to IOD and Name Space — first1, 3:43 PM (0/0)
I support .SHOP for Name.Space — netizen1, 5:41 AM (0/0)
I PROTEST AGAINST THAT FORUM SYSTEM — jefsey, 4:01 AM (1/1)

Each reload means reloading approx. 1 MB! — friedrich, 10:45 PM (0/0)

ICANN Bribery? — jtrade, 3:55 AM (0/0)
Domains already "registered" at Name.Space — zgyeo, 2:47 AM (2/4)

Name-Space has rights — Merlin, 2:56 AM (1/2)

CAS-COM = Commercial Connect, Inc — zgyeo, 3:08 AM (1/1)

Who are you? — Merlin, 3:23 AM (0/0)

And the people shouting for Name.Space must have registered great domains with Name.Space! — zgyeo, 2:54 AM (0/0)

"Dirt in The Domain Name Game" — jtrade, Sun 12:11 AM (0/0)
They are great — prissyfit, Sat 1:32 PM (0/0)
Name Space Inc. Application — The Walt Disney Company, Fri 11:29 PM (2/7)

Stability of the Internet? — S. Hudgens, Sat 3:48 AM (1/4)

Bumping Trademark Infringement — PHXbird, Sat 5:31 PM (2/3)

This is what the law says ... — friedrich, Sun 12:40 AM (1/1)

Registration-YES; lawsuits-NO — PHXbird, 9:45 PM (0/0)

TMs — World Thoughts, Sat 6:01 PM (0/0)

I Support Name-Space For .Shop TLD — shawn, Sat 1:25 AM (1/1)

Support .SHOP for NAME-SPACE. — choice, Sun 12:24 AM (0/0)

Top Level Domains — seanjason, Fri 8:53 PM (0/0)
Support for Name.Space and .shop — S. Hudgens, Fri 4:33 PM (0/0)
Support Name Space — daimonic, Fri 8:03 AM (0/0)
Do you know why NAME-SPACE'S .SHOP is best? — webcafe, Fri 1:47 AM (0/0)
Support for Name.Space application — URLMerchant, Fri 1:47 AM (1/1)

I support for Name-space application too!! — grimnaru, Fri 2:10 AM (0/0)

Let's hope the ICANN doesn't approve too many of these! — ipguy, Fri 12:38 AM (0/0)
.games tld — mevans, Thu 8:19 PM (0/0)
I DO NOT AGREE NAME.SPACE IS NOT BEST FOR .SHOP — Talmage, Thu 3:18 PM (0/0)
I support Name-Space — jtrade, Wed 10:02 PM (2/3)

Support .shop by name-spce! — webcafe, Fri 1:22 AM (0/0)
I support name-space's .shop too! — pasteltone, Thu 1:28 AM (1/1)

Also support .SHOP for Name.Space — netizen1, Thu 10:33 PM (0/0)

Unexplored, Inc. Urges Acceptance of .Shop Registrations by Name-Space — Unexplored, Wed 9:43 PM (0/0)
NAME-SPACE'S .SHOP IS NOT THE BEST .SHOP — Talmage, Wed 2:24 PM (1/1)

Name Space Has Only One Business Interest And Specialty — aaaswt, Thu 2:34 PM (0/0)

Yes to .SHOP by NAME-SPACE ! — arts Lee, Wed 6:58 AM (0/0)
VOTE to .SHOP by NAME-SPACE — net, Wed 6:45 AM (0/0)
New Tld's and ICANN Conflict of Interest? — jtrade, Wed 2:20 AM (0/0)
Yes to .ART by NameSpace — cello, Mon 6:45 AM (0/0)
Yes to Name Space: common sense, democracy, free market — Ivo, Mon 1:52 AM (0/0)
Preregistrations allowed with NSI!!!! — C.Bell, Mon 1:46 AM (0/0)
Hurray for Name Space — pdr, October 29 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)
ICANN say yes to Namespace — noisefactor, October 29 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
yes to Name.Space — fly, October 29 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)
I support name.space — patty, October 28 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
NEED FOT MORE AND MORE TLD'S — ajay, October 28 @ 8:49 AM (0/0)
"Beware the ICANN Board Squatters" — jtrade, October 27 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)
Beware of capitalist-speak — Melvin Q. Watchpocket, October 27 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)
fails completely — squish, October 26 @ 1:30 PM (2/6)

Name-Space isn't the "New Kid On The Block" — aaaswt, October 27 @ 2:03 PM (0/0)
ya, its not perfect... — xaero, October 26 @ 2:30 PM (1/4)

Right But Wrong — ChrisT, October 26 @ 6:21 PM (1/3)

Not many but a few — xaero, October 26 @ 10:09 PM (1/2)

Why Biased? — ChrisT, Mon 3:57 PM (1/1)

The usual.. — xaero, Wed 4:58 PM (0/0)

TO ICANN board members, staff, and applicants (including NAMESPACE)......WHERE ARE YOU???? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 4:22 AM (1/2)

Please... — DotIT, October 26 @ 7:01 AM (1/1)

Who are you... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 11:47 PM (0/0)

give pioneers a chance - vote for namespace and IOD - Interview about ICANN - president Ether Dyser — ted, October 25 @ 11:21 PM (1/3)

Generally, but Name space in particular — cojock, October 27 @ 10:57 PM (1/2)

Dot Travel — cojock, October 27 @ 11:23 PM (1/1)

.travel — herricktravel, Fri 2:07 PM (0/0)

NameSpace — peniel, October 25 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)
Can I register .web now — Anili, October 25 @ 2:15 PM (1/1)

Yes, but you must hope that IOD's application is accepted (as it would be fair) — fabrcop, October 25 @ 3:29 PM (0/0)

: ( — World Thoughts, October 25 @ 8:26 AM (0/0)
MSNBC Article about ICANN and .Web — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:49 AM (2/4)

msnbc-meeks-icann — webster, October 26 @ 5:45 PM (2/2)

PR flacks really need to restrain themselves :-) — pvos, October 27 @ 5:22 PM (0/0)
Right... — cambler, October 26 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)

NeuStar Bribing/Threatening ICANN? — pvos, October 25 @ 6:06 PM (0/0)

Comments Perios Must be Extended Even Longer! — jtrade, October 25 @ 3:29 AM (0/0)
YES to .magic by Name.Space — Igor, October 25 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)
More Than One — ChrisT, October 24 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)
Vote Yes to Name.Space — Joe Trip, October 24 @ 1:29 PM (0/0)
Where's the Competition? — jtrade, October 24 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)
YES to .lab — labdir, October 23 @ 2:38 PM (0/0)
What needs our future internet - pioneers like namespace or IOD - or monopolies ? whats your mind ? — ted, October 23 @ 6:39 AM (0/0)
Name-space Application for dot shop !! — grimnaru, October 23 @ 2:16 AM (4/17)

Why Name Space? — mgcarter, Fri 9:38 PM (0/0)
Vote to Name Space's dot shop: common sense! — sexy, Tue 6:41 AM (3/3)

Yes to name-space DOT SHOP!!!! — emails, Wed 6:03 AM (0/0)
I agree that Name.space's .shop is a good for a new gTLD. — asia, Wed 5:13 AM (0/0)
I vote to Name-space's .shop now! — dream, Tue 11:27 PM (0/0)

New gTLD - name-space's .shop domain are the peoples choice!! — bluecdm, October 23 @ 8:23 PM (6/6)

We likes name-space's .shop domain! — viohouse, Tue 3:48 AM (0/0)
ICANN say yes to name space's .shop domain too!! — homeshopping, Tue 3:32 AM (0/0)
I cann say "yes to namespace's dot shop" domain name! — ekorea, Mon 8:01 AM (0/0)
Can I register .shop domain name? — korea.shop, October 28 @ 5:37 PM (0/0)
Can I register .shop domain name? — shoppe, October 28 @ 5:21 PM (0/0)
Name-Space survey of the internet community-Give them .shop. — aaaswt, October 24 @ 1:14 PM (0/0)

I like name-spce .shop domain name! — eeuni, October 23 @ 8:02 PM (4/4)

I suport name-space's .shop too! — stockexchange, Tue 5:13 AM (0/0)
I suport name-space's .shop — dot shop, Mon 7:19 AM (0/0)
Yes to .shop by name-space !! — shops, Mon 7:10 AM (0/0)
I'd like register name-space .shop domain name too! — art korea, October 29 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)

Comments about ICANN New TLD process - Is anything being done about it? — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)
Pioneer Preference — cambler, October 22 @ 8:04 PM (4/22)

Mr Ambler, please can you answer my questions — wiredz, October 25 @ 1:03 PM (5/9)

WiredZ...why didn't you say you were from openSRS.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, Tue 3:54 AM (0/0)
Response — cambler, October 25 @ 7:40 PM (0/0)
wiredz misunderstands or misrepresents the ruling's significance — pvos, October 25 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)
This shows that IOD can't use .web as a trademark but does not deny IOD's rights on .web — fabrcop, October 25 @ 3:39 PM (2/4)

Image Online Design is the only proven regsitry for .web — johnnie, Fri 6:52 AM (0/0)
Let us first discuss what is the meaning of Rights & Trademarks — wiredz, October 27 @ 10:22 AM (2/2)

Wiredz reported ridicolously *wrong* facts and lost his credibility!!! — fabrcop, Sat 1:43 PM (0/0)
Response — cambler, October 27 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)

It's Hard To Take "WIREDZ" Seriously... — pilot2, October 25 @ 1:37 PM (0/0)

ICANN, PLEASE READ -- "The .Web Internet Domain Registry" - NOT !! — kcrash, October 25 @ 9:20 AM (1/1)

You might be right... — fagzal, Sun 12:16 AM (0/0)

FCC should have legal jurisdiction over the ICANN process — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 9:00 PM (2/8)

FCC should have legal jurisdiction over the ICANN process — kcrash, October 23 @ 8:04 AM (1/2)

You give readers a comical break — ALLDNS, October 23 @ 9:44 AM (1/1)

Who knows? — kcrash, October 25 @ 9:01 AM (0/0)

Can the political jokes — jmgraham, October 22 @ 10:02 PM (2/4)

Sir. . . — World Thoughts, October 23 @ 2:49 AM (0/0)
This is certainly no Joke! — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)

Think Again: Do You Really Want The FCC To Control ICANN? — pilot2, October 25 @ 4:18 PM (1/1)

ICANN is not a Government entity — ALLDNS, October 26 @ 8:15 AM (0/0)

hear hear! — anthony, October 22 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)

newbie: Please help - domain chanceled — Guaranie, October 22 @ 9:58 AM (0/0)
Moderator - Consider placing General Comments at top of Forum — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 3:22 AM (1/2)

YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT SIR. THAT'S WHY I POST A SIMILAR MESSASGE BELOW. MODERATOR-PLEASE NOTE! — Facilitator, October 22 @ 6:46 PM (1/1)

I agree — anthony, October 25 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)

Where is due process and the standards in all of this? — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 3:06 AM (1/1)

See below response — Hudgens, October 22 @ 5:11 PM (0/0)

Where are the rules? — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)
***GENERAL COMMENTS AT BOTTOM OF FORUM***GENERAL COMMENTS AT BOTTOM OF FORUM*** — Facilitator, October 22 @ 1:47 AM (1/1)

With all due respect sir.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 22 @ 1:40 PM (0/0)

.ads domains — kh, October 21 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
Namespace Application — sjk, October 19 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:40 PM (1/1)

I want to add my support to extend this forum — emc2, October 18 @ 6:24 PM (0/0)

Reservations about Name.Space — Korskarn, October 15 @ 1:39 PM (1/1)

Name space — Ange, October 17 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)

Greed by Name.Space — hoffy, October 14 @ 11:34 PM (3/6)

Greed, or Saints? — kcrash, October 23 @ 8:13 AM (0/0)
Name.Space is simply trying to help make the Internet what it should be. — Hudgens, October 22 @ 1:16 AM (1/2)

Who says Namespace will not get New TLDs? — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 2:28 AM (1/1)

ICANN rules regarding new TLD's — Hudgens, October 22 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)

You missed the mark. — cello, October 15 @ 2:16 AM (1/1)

I missed the mark? — hoffy, October 15 @ 5:30 AM (0/0)

TO THE ICANN BOARD MEMBERS: Dot/IOD Supporters are getting organized...We are building a website!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)
What is the Name.Space intent? — marshm, October 14 @ 3:06 AM (1/1)

LAND GRAB? — kcrash, October 23 @ 7:39 AM (0/0)

Name-Space Application for .Shop and IODesign Application for .Web — Attorney, October 14 @ 1:43 AM (5/12)

IOD and Namespace may be granted .Shop — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 2:41 AM (2/4)

Who is to say. . . — For The People, October 22 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
Before you risk making a fool of yourself you should read the applications. — anthony, October 22 @ 8:18 PM (2/2)

ALLDNS Will NEVER Get The Point! — Sarah, October 23 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
The point of my comment — ALLDNS, October 22 @ 9:47 PM (0/0)

IOD should run .web & Name.Space should get .shop — Hudgens, October 22 @ 1:07 AM (2/2)

Image Online Design is the best registry for .web — Johnnie, October 29 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)
IOD should run .web — johnnyshin, October 26 @ 2:21 PM (0/0)

IODesign and Name-Space new gtlds... — Tomkins.J, October 14 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
a couple of greatest pioneers — cello, October 14 @ 6:07 AM (1/1)

Concrete Name is more good for ASIA and Africa, East Europe, Latin America people. — JP Kim, October 18 @ 8:58 AM (0/0)

Namespace and Image Online Design — first1, October 14 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)

Moderator: Please correct error in TLD description. — Name.Space, October 14 @ 12:38 AM (2/14)

INFINITE/UNIVERSAL TLDs: Something to think about... uTLDs !!! — kcrash, October 23 @ 7:08 AM (1/2)

Agreed! - eTLD (extended Top Level Domains) — boris7, October 26 @ 10:44 AM (1/1)

Agreed! - eTLD (extended Top Level Domains) — kcrash, October 29 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)

Mr. Moderator clearly has .web on his / her mind! — anthony, October 14 @ 4:42 PM (1/10)

Name.Space knows who should get .web — Hudgens, October 22 @ 1:11 AM (2/9)

Important! Name Space did not have a .web registry just because... — fabrcop, October 23 @ 9:45 AM (0/0)
Let a hundred thousand flowers (NAMES!) bloom — Melvin Q. Watchpocket, October 22 @ 10:21 PM (2/7)

open up the space with name-space...-miba — miba, October 23 @ 10:21 PM (0/0)
Hmmm. . . some interesting notions you have there. . . — World Thoughts, October 23 @ 3:19 AM (1/5)

We should all have the right... — kcrash, October 23 @ 5:08 AM (1/4)

Clearly — For The People, October 23 @ 2:41 PM (1/3)

uTLD, uSRS, uDNS — kcrash, October 25 @ 8:35 AM (1/2)

Let's get back to praising name-space and iodesign... — Miba, October 25 @ 11:34 PM (1/1)

Name-Space and IOD Deserve More Than Our Praise — aaaswt, October 28 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)

.africa, etc. Application by Rathbawn Computers Limited — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:38 PM (5/8)

whats about .europe or .eu domain??? — reklov, 7:03 PM (1/1)

.eu & .eu.com — PHXbird, 9:53 PM (0/0)

What does Sansansan mean? — YankeeFan, Fri 3:32 AM (0/0)
AFRICA for AFRICANS — MikeX, Mon 3:38 PM (1/2)

I absolutely agree! — rolandg, Thu 8:20 AM (1/1)

Thoughts — For The People, Thu 10:03 AM (0/0)

Rathbawn's app — peniel, October 25 @ 10:52 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)

.air, etc. Application by Société Internationale de Télécommunications Aéronautiques — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:38 PM (45/49)

support for .air — Mansour DIOP, Fri 8:15 PM (0/0)
Support.air — ScottGR, Fri 8:11 PM (0/0)
33 African Airlines Support ".air" — RDelgado, Fri 3:20 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — James Munene, Fri 2:46 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — GN, Fri 2:46 PM (0/0)
support of .air creation — airburundi, Fri 2:13 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — Air Mauritius DIRIT, Fri 2:09 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — Air Namibia (Pty) Ltd, Fri 1:45 PM (0/0)
ICANN - Flughafen Frankfurt Main AG (Airport) — RDelgado, Fri 12:09 AM (0/0)
support for SITA ".air" initiative — air france, Fri 12:06 AM (0/0)
Support for .air - Ethiopian Airlines — RDelgado, Fri 11:39 AM (0/0)
Support for .air — AIR FRANCE DGIT, Fri 9:58 AM (0/0)
Support for .air — AmadeusDP, Thu 1:17 PM (0/0)
support for .air — jrahib, Thu 11:29 AM (0/0)
Support for SITA .air TLD Proposal — dcaseychelles, Thu 10:46 AM (0/0)
28 Middle East and North African airlines support dot-air — egyptair, Wed 12:30 AM (0/0)
Support for SITA .AIR proposal — qantas, October 29 @ 5:45 AM (0/0)
Support SITA for ".air" TLD Application — asasvithq, October 28 @ 6:09 AM (0/0)
Support of ".air" — Ecabezas, October 27 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
Support ".air" — Ecabezas, October 27 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)
support for .air — mirekb, October 27 @ 7:48 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — alitalia, October 27 @ 12:58 AM (0/0)
Support for .air — China Airlines, October 27 @ 6:15 AM (0/0)
too narrow — pedro, October 27 @ 5:37 AM (0/0)
Support of ".air" — GOAAIT, October 26 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)
Support for .air — aa, October 26 @ 4:52 PM (0/0)
Support — NForgeard, October 26 @ 10:16 AM (0/0)
Support — BobDFW, October 25 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)
Airport Support for the ".air" Proposal — sami, October 25 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
support for air applications — FdeCock, October 25 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)
Support to SITA — aaco, October 25 @ 8:28 AM (0/0)
Support for Air — KK, October 24 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)
Supporting SITA's .air TLD application — polyair, October 24 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
Yes for .air Application by SITA — lamyt, October 23 @ 3:29 PM (0/0)
Support for SITA's application for .air — jmornement, October 23 @ 7:16 AM (0/0)
Strong Support for the .air Application by SITA — salaskar, October 21 @ 4:12 PM (0/0)
Support fot ".air" Application by SITA — Evergreen, October 21 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
Support for .air Application by SITA — lhanlock, October 20 @ 11:47 PM (0/0)
Support for ".air" — NWA, October 20 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)
A very sound proposal — global view, October 19 @ 7:08 PM (0/0)
Good idea — sjk, October 19 @ 7:16 AM (0/0)
Support for the creation of .air — abugallo, October 18 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:43 PM (1/1)

Support for SITA — coair, October 23 @ 4:12 PM (0/0)

Comments — GeorgesL, October 17 @ 9:55 AM (2/3)

u eat apples and oranges — salaskar, October 21 @ 4:21 PM (1/1)

SITA - nonprofit - get a grip — georgesl, October 23 @ 7:01 AM (0/0)

Response to Comments — RDelgado, October 18 @ 10:41 AM (0/0)

Super proposal — huguesdb, October 16 @ 11:37 PM (0/0)

.biz, etc. Application by Abacus America, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:37 PM (49/99)

ABACUS - Great Concept — ak, 55 minutes ago (0/0)
USA families — mikes, 12:00 AM (0/0)
yes to FAM — henry, 11:52 PM (0/0)
.fam — andyG, 11:44 PM (0/0)
Out of 200 proposed TLDs only one is COOL — kevinY , 11:29 PM (0/0)
.cool — kevinY , 11:20 PM (0/0)
Family — JamesZ , 11:14 PM (0/0)
I Agree (.FAM and .XXX) — tw, 10:36 PM (0/0)
Families need .FAM — sl, 10:22 PM (0/0)
support for .COOL — tn, 9:29 PM (1/1)

Too limited — PHXbird, 10:00 PM (0/0)

.COOL great idea — AFree , 9:21 PM (1/1)

Not international enough — PHXbird, 9:58 PM (0/0)

This is the only application that can reach profitability within the first month - HOW? — griffiths, 6:07 PM (0/0)
IOD issue — useyourhead, 6:47 AM (0/0)
.cool will just be a fad — YankeeFan, Fri 3:31 AM (2/2)

just a fad ? — tn, 10:02 PM (0/0)
Faddish names — twosheds, Fri 5:14 PM (0/0)

.XXX a poor idea — ipguy, Fri 12:10 AM (0/0)
Does Pedro work for Abacus? — YankeeFan, Wed 8:03 AM (3/8)

No pressing need for .FAM ??? — JohnD, Thu 10:06 PM (0/0)
Sorry but you are not fully correct — nickl, Thu 7:12 PM (0/0)
Does it matter — pedro, Wed 8:14 PM (1/5)

Ready to go — cambler, Thu 2:18 AM (1/4)

A few words — useyourhead, Fri 11:27 PM (1/3)

Registry for Review — cambler, Sat 3:08 AM (1/2)

There is nothing there — useyourhead, 6:27 AM (1/1)

will review — useyourhead, 6:29 AM (0/0)

Abacus got it right — pedro, Wed 4:26 AM (0/0)
Yes to .FAM — AndrewK , Tue 9:42 PM (0/0)
Why Abacus for .biz — ChrisK , Tue 9:00 PM (0/0)
About dot .biz and .inc — dimitrov@mailcity.com, Tue 7:44 AM (0/0)
MSNBC.com Pole — domainking, Tue 12:38 AM (0/0)
.COOL — domainking, Mon 11:50 PM (0/0)
Trying to be cool — nickl, October 27 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)
cool — jamesh, October 27 @ 7:31 PM (1/1)

.FAM is the way to go — domainking, October 27 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)

.fam — mikeS, October 27 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
It is very important for ICANN to be fair to the public — alexj, October 26 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
To: saynotoabacus — useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)
EXPERIENCE WITH ABACUS, INC. — vldiaz, October 26 @ 3:07 AM (0/0)
Abacus App — peniel, October 25 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
I like .cool — ChrisK , October 25 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
Different policies for ".biz" portion — Josh Kyle, October 24 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)

ICANN decides not a competitor — Formal Response, October 25 @ 1:03 AM (0/0)

Anyone know who else has it ready to go? — useyourhead, October 23 @ 5:58 AM (1/9)

IOD has been online for over 4 years — cambler, October 23 @ 6:51 AM (3/8)

Image Online Design — Wisdom21, Tue 1:29 AM (0/0)
The technology by Abacus — Formal Response, October 25 @ 1:28 AM (0/0)
registry since 1996? — anonymous, October 24 @ 6:31 AM (2/5)

Refer to the updates ICANN just posted on their web site — wiredz, October 25 @ 10:56 AM (1/1)

This shows that IOD can't use .web as a trademark but does not deny IOD's rights on .web . — fabrcop, October 25 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)

Our support — cambler, October 24 @ 7:50 AM (1/2)

Mr Ambler used the word 'advised' — wiredz, October 25 @ 12:17 AM (1/1)

Response — cambler, October 25 @ 7:45 PM (0/0)

.xxx — MikeS, October 22 @ 10:31 PM (2/2)

.Sex TLD — Satori, October 25 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)
a voluntary association: ".kids" is ok, but a mandatory ".xxx" is not. — markusbaccus, October 24 @ 7:46 PM (0/0)

Young people — nickl, October 22 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)
I agree with jandl — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
BID SYSTEM UNFAIR to UNRICH — stokdoctor, October 21 @ 10:32 PM (2/2)

This is negotiable — Formal Response, October 25 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
I disagree — pedro, October 23 @ 4:49 AM (0/0)

Sorry for the excessive use of exclamation marks. My only intent was to draw your attention to — SayNoToAbacus, October 21 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)

Strong words — PHXbird, October 21 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)

WWW.NAMES4EVER.COM — Domainking, October 20 @ 7:35 PM (2/2)

I like Names4ever.com — Monya, October 24 @ 3:52 PM (0/0)
Names4ever are excellent. They are one of the BEST — fabiolg, October 24 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)

To saynotoabacus — use your head, October 20 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
.biz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:48 PM (1/1)

bz cannot be the business domain — b. adams, October 23 @ 11:58 PM (0/0)

Comments — sjk, October 19 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
Way to go Abacus! — use your head, October 19 @ 6:19 AM (1/4)

Sounds like you work for Abacus (or were paid to send that message)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 20 @ 12:10 AM (3/3)

where did all the good names go? — anonymous, October 24 @ 5:41 AM (0/0)
Abacus offers superior one on one customer service. — stevexplor, October 20 @ 6:22 AM (0/0)
Hey, enought with the !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — For The People, October 20 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
Abacus is trying to BUY your support!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)

Abacus buying support? — PHXbird, October 17 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)

We want to see your application — emc2, October 17 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)
.fam is needed — dconder, October 16 @ 9:11 PM (1/10)

.fam provided by .xxx -- Bad Idea. — bennionjd, October 16 @ 10:52 PM (4/9)

.fam and .xxx — Conway, October 24 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)
FAM is needed, but requests high responsability — Schultz-FAMtld, October 20 @ 8:17 AM (2/2)

Abacus is fit to operate .fam — pedro, October 23 @ 5:25 AM (0/0)
Sorry - Misspelling "Our Website" — Schultz-FAMtld, October 20 @ 8:25 AM (0/0)

your logic is flawed — dconder, October 19 @ 12:33 AM (0/0)
Bad idea is posting opinion without reading the application — pedro, October 17 @ 2:04 AM (1/3)

I've done my reading — bennionjd, October 20 @ 5:43 AM (1/2)

There are no other applicants — dconder, October 23 @ 6:00 PM (1/1)

Not a now-or-never. — bennionjd, October 24 @ 4:57 AM (0/0)

Simply unworkable — jandl, October 16 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)
.BIZ applications — korskarn, October 15 @ 4:43 PM (2/4)

missing the point — jandl, October 16 @ 12:13 AM (1/2)

i did not know that — b. adams, October 24 @ 12:10 AM (1/1)

re: I did not know that — jandl, October 29 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)

Strongly disagree — pedro, October 15 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)

Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)

.biz, etc. Application by Affinity Internet, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:30 PM (13/42)

Further Statement in Support of our Application — PhilBerent, 11:50 PM (0/0)
Affinity application — jehlers, October 28 @ 5:07 AM (0/0)
Proposal analysis - Affinity's NAME LOTTERY AND HIGH FEES — TLD Facts, October 26 @ 3:13 PM (1/1)

Identity and Affiliation Please? — PhilBerent, October 26 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)

Affinity App — peniel, October 25 @ 10:58 PM (1/1)

how come — mashala, October 26 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)

Reply — dd5166, October 24 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)
jandl is right. — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
Support for Affinity Proposal — SSattaur, October 21 @ 2:45 PM (0/0)
.biz and .ebiz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 5:09 PM (1/9)

The problem of confusion between Cameroon and ".com" — philberent, October 19 @ 8:06 PM (2/8)

.biz — shaoyi, October 20 @ 7:27 PM (0/0)
Confusion between ".bz" and ".biz" — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 9:58 PM (3/6)

You are mistaken — jandl, October 22 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
.BZ marketing — Phxbird, October 20 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
Belize etc — philberent, October 19 @ 11:46 PM (1/3)

.biz and .ebiz would result in confusion — A. Kinney, October 20 @ 4:28 AM (2/2)

.bz exists and so does .BIZ — jandl, October 21 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
Who ARE you? — PhilBerent, October 20 @ 8:14 AM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
.biz exists already people!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:03 AM (1/2)

Not all applications are in conflict — marshm, October 17 @ 4:11 AM (1/1)

True — jandl, October 19 @ 12:06 AM (0/0)

Why not simply say .BIZ will be a mega corp TLD? — jandl, October 16 @ 8:21 PM (1/4)

Mega dogwalkers — PhilBerent, October 16 @ 10:35 PM (3/3)

Leah is an ORSC person — wiredz, October 28 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
honesty? — jandl, October 17 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
Understanding a SOHO — jandl, October 17 @ 1:27 AM (0/0)

application materials page returns "forbidden" error in IE5 — jandl, October 14 @ 7:33 PM (0/0)
Our Application — PhilBerent, October 14 @ 1:18 PM (2/12)

Overcoming cybersquatting and domain name speculation — wiredz, October 28 @ 11:45 AM (0/0)
If you have to choose just one TLD what will it be? — anthony, October 14 @ 1:22 PM (1/10)

TLD string — PhilBerent, October 14 @ 6:57 PM (1/9)

Why would you choose a TLD which already exists? — jandl, October 14 @ 7:32 PM (2/8)

ORSC Root Zone Is ILLEGAL and NOT RECOGNIZED in the eyes of courts — wiredz, October 28 @ 11:30 AM (1/2)

Excuse me. . . — World Thoughts, October 28 @ 11:36 AM (1/1)

It's not even unofficial — jandl, October 29 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)

rootzone? — anthony, October 14 @ 9:38 PM (1/4)

Youcann.org — Ray, October 14 @ 10:09 PM (1/3)

Yawn, not another! — korskarn, October 15 @ 3:36 PM (2/2)

Let's understand the subject before making nonsensical comments — jandl, October 15 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
for your enlightenment — Ray, October 15 @ 7:02 PM (0/0)

.biz, etc. Application by iDomains, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:30 PM (10/19)

costs — may, 10 minutes ago (0/0)
Idomains has a well thought out plan.. — wehberf, 9:15 PM (1/1)

I was just thinking that.. — miles, 9:31 PM (0/0)

Critique of iDomains' Application — PhilBerent, 6:50 PM (1/2)

Somewhat confused?? — wehberf, 9:48 PM (1/1)

Reply and Request for Affiliation — PhilBerent, 11:53 PM (0/0)

iDomains app — peniel, October 25 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
It's called 'prior use.' — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:08 AM (1/4)

Proof Is Needed — wiredz, October 22 @ 1:11 PM (1/3)

who says a domain name has to be used for a website? — jandl, October 27 @ 10:59 PM (1/2)

Here is what is to be considered a "good" registry — wiredz, October 28 @ 12:05 AM (1/1)

ridiculous — jandl, October 29 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)

.biz and .ebiz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:44 PM (1/1)

How would it cause trouble?? I don't think you understand the issue.. — miles, 9:56 PM (0/0)

Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:48 PM (0/0)
Say No TO these .biz applicants. .biz already exists people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:06 AM (1/1)

.biz does not really exist... it's a joke.. — miles, 10:00 PM (0/0)

More CORE? — jandl, October 16 @ 7:27 AM (0/0)
Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)

.biz Application by JVTeam, LLC — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:29 PM (10/14)

Critique of JVTeam Application — Phil Berent, October 27 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
Single TLD extension proposals — peniel, October 25 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
Charter — PhilBerent, October 24 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
first use — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)
.biz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
and MORE CORE and more MONOPOLY and they also want .WEB — jandl, October 19 @ 12:25 AM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
YOU SHOULD KNOW BY NOW.....BIZ ALREADY EXISTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT IT ICANN!!!!!!!! — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:08 AM (1/4)

To Saynotoabacus: Why not just admit it? It's obvious. — useyourhead, October 26 @ 5:41 AM (1/3)

There is nothing underground about the ORSC rootzone — jandl, October 27 @ 10:52 PM (1/2)

ORSC Root Zone Is ILLEGAL and NOT RECOGNIZED in the eyes of courts — wiredz, October 28 @ 12:24 AM (1/1)

You just can't resist the ad hominems, can you? — jandl, October 29 @ 8:56 PM (0/0)

application materials same as biz3? — jandl, October 17 @ 2:33 AM (0/0)
Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)

.biz, etc. Application by KDD Internet Solutions Co., Ltd. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:29 PM (9/14)

KDD Internet Co. Ltd. Application — The Walt Disney Company, Fri 11:49 PM (1/1)

? — World Thoughts, Sat 1:44 AM (0/0)

Support to KDD — gbsobrevinas, October 27 @ 1:20 AM (0/0)
KDD app — peniel, October 25 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)
bizEXISTSalready. I agree with the people who say that there is an ORSC conflict. — bizEXISTSalready, October 22 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)
.biz — A. Kinney, October 19 @ 4:49 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:51 PM (0/0)
and no to KDD! and no to Affinity! and no to Idomains! DO YOU GET THE PICTURE???????????????????? — SayNoToAbacus, October 17 @ 4:10 AM (0/0)
.home is already in use — marshm, October 15 @ 3:49 AM (1/4)

ORSC is nothing but a bunch of lusers out to destroy the net.... — wiredz, October 22 @ 1:36 PM (2/3)

A note about wiredz... — marshm, October 22 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)
careful, wiredz — marshm, October 22 @ 3:24 PM (1/1)

Impact of Language — PHXbird, October 25 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)

Where is your application? — jandl, October 14 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)

.cash, etc. Application by Diebold Incorporated — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:28 PM (5/16)

Solid company, solid proposal — lapointe, October 27 @ 1:18 PM (0/0)
Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
Where's the Beef ! — global view, October 18 @ 12:49 AM (1/2)

Plenty of beef — marshm, October 18 @ 3:25 PM (1/1)

More information — marshm, October 18 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)

.CASH, .GLOBAL, .SECURE — marshm, October 17 @ 3:54 AM (1/6)

Lusers at Diebold have boldly attempted to create alternate root... — wiredz, October 22 @ 1:48 PM (3/5)

personal attacks have no business here — Ray, October 23 @ 1:42 AM (1/2)

Ray, I am just revealing the truths about Mr Marsh — wiredz, October 23 @ 4:40 PM (1/1)

Again, a note about wiredz... — marshm, October 23 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)

A note about wiredz... — marshm, October 22 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)
The facts obviously elude you, sir — marshm, October 22 @ 3:02 PM (0/0)

Diebold — Ray, October 13 @ 7:16 PM (1/3)

Diebold Application — marshm, October 13 @ 8:08 PM (1/2)

excuse me...? — tim, October 14 @ 12:32 AM (1/1)

still trying to delete but... — tim, October 14 @ 2:52 PM (0/0)

.co-op, etc. Application by Cooperative League of the USA — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:27 PM (273/317)

dot.co-op — Andrew Ferguson, 39 seconds ago (0/0)
support for .coop (and .co-op) — Tim Huet, Sat 11:59 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op! — chunter, Sat 11:14 PM (0/0)
Support .co-op — tsites, Sat 9:22 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — foodfront, Sat 8:04 PM (0/0)
I support .coop — nph, Sat 3:58 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — JSingh, Sat 2:12 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — daystar, Sat 2:39 AM (0/0)
Establish a .co-op TLD — gmoseley, Fri 10:02 PM (0/0)
Support for .coop — Manon Ress, Fri 9:11 PM (0/0)
Yes! to .co-op, says Whole Foods Co-op, Duluth — cvonrabe, Fri 8:22 PM (0/0)
Weaver Street Market Supports dot co-op — weaverst, Fri 5:58 PM (0/0)
.coop — pag, Fri 4:37 PM (0/0)
We need .co-op! — aerforcoops, Fri 3:26 PM (0/0)
.co-op — Chris Pyke, Fri 9:49 AM (0/0)
.co-op domain — pauld, Fri 1:17 AM (0/0)
.co-op designation — bread, Fri 12:59 AM (0/0)
NCGA wants .co-op! — NCGA, Fri 12:45 AM (1/1)

Affirm support for .coop — johneic3, Fri 3:20 PM (0/0)

support for .co-op — Rochelle Prunty, Thu 10:05 PM (1/1)

YES to .co-op - it will help create a more sustainable world — dschramm, Fri 3:39 AM (0/0)

support for ".co-op" — lmaisel, Thu 9:19 PM (0/0)
co-op support — Collision Centers, Thu 7:52 PM (0/0)
Co-op domain — Narci, Thu 6:41 PM (0/0)
.co-op — shane, Thu 5:57 PM (0/0)
coop domain — miguelito, Thu 4:46 PM (0/0)
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association Supports Dot Co-op — ndm0@nreca.org, Thu 3:55 PM (0/0)
CARS Cooperative supports "dot co-op" — CARS, Thu 3:41 PM (0/0)
dot.co-op — goNDdan, Thu 2:41 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — dallas, Thu 8:42 AM (0/0)
.co-op TDL — Mulle, Thu 7:31 AM (0/0)
dot co-op — liz, Thu 2:06 AM (0/0)
.coop — ligacoop, Wed 9:11 PM (0/0)
support — Allen, Wed 8:04 PM (0/0)
.co-op — jpadgham, Wed 8:00 PM (0/0)
support for .co-op — mapa, Wed 7:13 PM (0/0)
up with dot coop — lexcoop, Wed 6:52 PM (0/0)
coop.coop — pgilbertson, Wed 5:01 PM (1/1)

Support for .co-op tld application — elizwedge, Wed 6:43 PM (0/0)

co-op suffix — cps, Wed 4:31 PM (0/0)
Support .co-op — nsadawi, Wed 2:20 PM (0/0)
.co-op, please! — mhuddles, Wed 4:48 AM (0/0)
co-op domain — baggio, Wed 1:20 AM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — JimK, Tue 8:30 PM (0/0)
.co-op as new TLD — Co-op Housing Coalition, Tue 8:00 PM (0/0)
CCUC Support for the .co-op suffix — caldwelr, Tue 6:41 PM (0/0)
Co-operative Futures supports .co-op TLD — kluddecke, Tue 6:08 PM (0/0)
ICA Housing support .co-op tld — ICA Housing, Tue 9:53 AM (0/0)
support for .coop TLD — pazfamily, Tue 7:44 AM (0/0)
Support .co-op — kedberg, Mon 11:27 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op as domain name for co-operative organisations — inmaculada.buendia, Mon 4:35 PM (0/0)
ICA Global Women's Committee supports .co-op tld — ICA GWC, Mon 4:11 PM (0/0)
.co-op or .coop — Nancyr, Mon 3:33 PM (1/1)

Cooperative status requirement for use of .co-op or .coop — jbaugh, Mon 9:03 PM (0/0)

.co-op — lsherrmann, Mon 2:22 PM (0/0)
suffix .co-op supported — Binary, Mon 1:47 PM (0/0)
support for .co-op as domain name for co-operative organisations — ecrp, Mon 1:07 PM (0/0)
support for .co-op — Judith Hourston , Mon 9:42 AM (0/0)
support for co-op — rclendaniel, Mon 6:49 AM (0/0)
Yes for .co-op — NGagnat, Mon 4:58 AM (0/0)
Can you clarify... — huguesdb, October 30 @ 12:37 AM (1/2)

clarification — J Kenney, Mon 1:24 PM (1/1)

Thanks — huguesdb, Tue 1:30 AM (0/0)

In support of Co-op TLD — jnp, October 29 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)
co-op — cnmec_amy, October 29 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
.co-op — pmehnert, October 27 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)
Scottish Co-op support for .co-op TLD — martin.m, October 27 @ 8:08 PM (0/0)
.co-op — PGEC1, October 27 @ 7:08 PM (0/0)
co-op domain name — ronjc, October 27 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
.co-op — Co-Mo, October 27 @ 7:04 PM (0/0)
Coop TLD — caec, October 27 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)
Support for the .co-op TLD application — jbaugh, October 27 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)
Yes for top level domain, .co-op — conklin, October 27 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)
co-op — messmore, October 27 @ 6:01 PM (0/0)
Domain — cdcv, October 27 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
.co-op support — mat5, October 27 @ 5:25 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — gemcinfo, October 27 @ 4:47 PM (1/1)

.co-op — jct, Mon 4:00 PM (0/0)

Yes to .co-op domain — Tamara Mah, October 27 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)
Yes to .co-op — Jane Barnette, October 27 @ 4:09 PM (0/0)
co-op TLD — Michele, October 27 @ 3:33 PM (0/0)
.co-op TDL — broker, October 27 @ 3:28 PM (0/0)
Co-operative (.coop) - excellent — violetlight, October 27 @ 3:01 PM (0/0)
Vote Yes for .Co-op — ouachita, October 27 @ 3:01 PM (1/1)

Co-op TLD — LenBurch, Fri 9:02 PM (0/0)

co-op, etc. Application by Cooperative League of the USA — Luzzatti, October 27 @ 3:01 PM (1/1)

Proposal for a co-op top level domain — Shirley, October 27 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)

Everyone should know about cooperatives — RalphD, October 27 @ 2:59 PM (0/0)
support .co-op — jlowrey, October 27 @ 2:58 PM (0/0)
Caribbean Credit Unions Support .co-op! — dgrace2, October 27 @ 2:32 PM (0/0)
.co-op — isn, October 27 @ 2:25 PM (0/0)
British Credit Unions support .co-op! — dgrace2, October 27 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op and .coop from Adams Electric — adamsec, October 27 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)
coop — scout, October 27 @ 2:12 PM (0/0)
support .co-op — CRC, October 27 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
Welsh Co-operators support .co-op — Alex Bird, October 27 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)
Malaysian Support for .co-op — J Kenney, October 27 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)
Support for .co-op from the Philippines — J Kenney, October 27 @ 12:25 AM (0/0)
elabora, Italy - support for .co-op top level domain — elabora, October 27 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)
Promoting the co-operative advantage — nhomer, October 27 @ 8:43 AM (0/0)
Co-op principles set us apart — ethosetc, October 27 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)
Co-op Domain Name needed Worldwide — White-Cloud, October 27 @ 2:11 AM (0/0)
.coop — lbenander, October 27 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)
Wonderful support — huguesdb, October 27 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)
.co-op support — Franklin REC, October 26 @ 8:43 PM (0/0)
PREA and Allegheny EC Support .co-op! — JZimmerman, October 26 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)
Co-op Atlantic fully supports .co-op — doucdar, October 26 @ 7:15 PM (1/1)

.coop commonality — Karin, Wed 6:42 AM (0/0)

Help support an e-commerce identity for cooperatives — Michelle, October 26 @ 6:05 PM (0/0)
.coop : The Conseil Canadien de la Coopération supports — rltango, October 26 @ 4:04 PM (0/0)
Support for .coop or .co-op — robert.slade, October 26 @ 3:13 PM (0/0)
Support new domain name ".co-op" — RCEC, October 26 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)
We Support .CO-OP — RGEC, October 26 @ 2:30 PM (1/1)

support for .co-op — aitch, Mon 5:07 PM (0/0)

Co-op TLD — Julie Durick, October 26 @ 2:16 PM (0/0)
.co-op will benefit cooperatives, customers — meeker , October 26 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
There is a need for .co-op identity — Cathy, October 26 @ 1:35 PM (0/0)
Confcooperative, Italy - support for .co-op top level domain — confcoop, October 26 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
co-op has a dash and is too long — squish, October 26 @ 1:06 PM (1/1)

app includes .coop as well — J Kenney, October 26 @ 2:47 PM (0/0)

.co-op as top-level domain — Parke, October 26 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)
.co-op essential — Tantric, October 26 @ 11:29 AM (1/1)

yes co-op! not com — sez, October 27 @ 1:42 PM (0/0)

World's Consumer Co-ops supports new domain — cci, October 26 @ 9:59 AM (0/0)
Aussie Support for :dot co-op" — davidg, October 26 @ 5:39 AM (0/0)
.co-op — Richard R. Smith, October 26 @ 12:49 AM (0/0)
.coop extension — peniel, October 25 @ 11:12 PM (0/0)
.co-op — marywallace, October 25 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
Uruguayan cooperatives support the new tld coop — neticoop, October 25 @ 8:44 PM (0/0)
Strong support for co-op TLD — Schwettmann, October 25 @ 7:46 PM (0/0)
dot co-op — Patrice, October 25 @ 7:14 PM (1/1)

In support of .co-op .coop — kag7, October 27 @ 4:07 PM (0/0)

.co-op — checkers4, October 25 @ 7:03 PM (0/0)
.coop — darnholt, October 25 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)
.co-op — seiremc, October 25 @ 6:52 PM (0/0)
What comes after the dot is important — vmoulton, October 25 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)
.co-op — sheco, October 25 @ 4:08 PM (1/1)

.Co-op Support — alester, October 26 @ 7:57 PM (0/0)

dot co-op — OSCAprez, October 25 @ 4:02 PM (0/0)
.co-op top level domain — Tex114Concho, October 25 @ 3:04 PM (0/0)
.co-op — swcc, October 25 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)
COPAC supports .co-op or .coop TLD — COPAC, October 25 @ 2:00 PM (0/0)
Requesting new Internet suffix for electric co-ops — MAM, October 25 @ 1:25 PM (0/0)
.co-op tld -- all for it — alison, October 25 @ 1:03 PM (0/0)
co-op suffix for co-op domain names — jhath, October 25 @ 11:48 AM (0/0)
UK worker co-ops say yes to .CO-OP — bobcannell, October 25 @ 10:42 AM (0/0)
new TLD .co-op should be created — sukalac, October 25 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
ICAO strongly support for .co-op on behalf of World Farmer — ICAO, October 25 @ 6:16 AM (0/0)
Such a fine idea — NACF, October 25 @ 2:55 AM (0/0)
Yes, coop suffix would be useful — Mary , October 24 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)
.co-op domain name — The Fair World Project, October 24 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)
CHF supports .co-op — hbowen4, October 24 @ 7:33 PM (0/0)
CUNA Mutual Group Supports .co-op TLD — larryblanchard, October 24 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
.co-op — MAC, October 24 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)
dot co-op — David J. Thompson, October 24 @ 4:44 PM (1/1)

student housing co-op supports .co-op — stuart baker, October 26 @ 10:05 PM (0/0)

.coop — Jim Ashby, October 24 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)
Co-ops, not the ordinary .org — alleni, October 24 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)
need for .co-op suffix — grammysboy, October 24 @ 4:00 PM (0/0)
Consumer Federation of America and Consumers Union Endorse Internet Suffix for Co-ops — art jaeger, October 24 @ 3:49 PM (0/0)
support for .co-op — mmmelius, October 24 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)
.co-op — clara1, October 24 @ 3:39 PM (0/0)
Yes to co-op tld — gfountain, October 24 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)
YES to .co-op TLD — paulz, October 24 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — danros, October 24 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)
Legacoop, Italy -- support for .co-op — J Kenney, October 24 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD -- yes — wra5438, October 24 @ 1:11 PM (0/0)
Support for .co-op — jautry@flintemc.com, October 24 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)
coop — Ron Stack , October 24 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
The Brazilian Cooperative Organization Supports .co-op — J Kenney, October 24 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
Co-op designation — CGANE, October 24 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
Support for .co-op TLD — ICA President, October 24 @ 8:33 AM (2/2)

Singapore support .co-op TLD — Leow Peng Kui, Wed 3:22 AM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — peterhunt, Mon 11:51 AM (0/0)

Co-op domain — CFCBrad, October 24 @ 7:42 AM (0/0)
I support ".co-op" — Ionesco, October 24 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)
".co-op" domain name — WRECA, October 23 @ 11:49 PM (0/0)
.co-op — bbierstedt, October 23 @ 10:37 PM (0/0)
co-op suffix — Wilton 1, October 23 @ 9:59 PM (0/0)
yes to .co-op — dmaxwell, October 23 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
.co-op — john@sec, October 23 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)
.co-op — dhoefer, October 23 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
.co-op application — rbroady, October 23 @ 8:33 PM (0/0)
.co-op — Renee' Brown, October 23 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)
.co-op TLD — WCEC, October 23 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)
support of .co-op — shermajeane, October 23 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
e-commerce identity for cooperatives! — sarah a clark, October 23 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)
Supporting .co-op — randy, October 23 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
.co-op support — kos, October 23 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)
Support of Application of Cooperative Leave of USA — Emery Maez, October 23 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)
.co-op — WisFedCoop, October 23 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
Please accept the proposed .co-op TLD — gregm, October 23 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
In support of .co-op — lcline, October 23 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
Of Course! — gabenh, October 23 @ 5:05 PM (0/0)